DOCSLIB.ORG

EARED OWL &Lpar;<I>ASIO OTUS</I>

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EARED OWL &Lpar;<I>ASIO OTUS</I> j. RaptorRes. 31(2):175-186 ¸ 1997 The Raptor ResearchFoundation, Inc. THE LONG-EARED OWL (ASIO OTUS) AND FOREST MANAGEMENT: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE DENVER W. HOLT Owl ResearchInstitute, P.O. Box 8335, Missoula, MT 59807 U.S.A. ABSTRACT.--InNorth America, 13 of 20 breeding seasonstudies reporting on Long-earedOwl (Asio otus)reproduction were conductedin open country habitats,four in woodland or edge habitatsand three in predominantlywoodland habitat. Sixteenof 22 nonbreedingseason studies that reported com- munal roost siteswere located in forest/edge habitats,five reported locationsin open spaceand one wasfound within forest habitat.There is currentlylittle data to indicate either a negativeor positive effect of forest-managementpractices on this species.Although there appearsto be someevidence of population declinesin specificgeographic areas, these impactshave been attributed to lossof riparian vegetation,conversion of foraging areasto agriculturalfields and reforestationof open habitats.The Long-eared Owl's ecomorphologyis suggestiveof a speciesthat inhabits open country.Additionally, its primary food is small mammals (e.g., microtine and heteromyid rodents) which inhabit open country. Shouldthe Long-earedOwl be considereda forestowl? Research data would suggestno; however,studies from extensive deciduous and coniferous woodlands are needed. KEYWORDS: Long-earedOwl; forestry; habitat;, diet;, ecomorphology; Asio otus. El bfiho (Asiootus) y administracitn forestal:un revisode la literatura RESUMEN.-•Ennorte amtrica, 13 de 20 estudiosde tiempos de cria reportadasen el bfiho Asio otus fueron evaluadosen hfbitat del campo amplio, cuatro en bosqueso orillas de hfbitat, y tres en mayoria de hfbitat de bosque.Diecistis de 22 estudiosen tiempossin crla que reportaronsitios de percha comunalfueron 1ocalizadasen bosque/hfbitat de orilla, cinco lugaresreportados en espacioabierto, y uno fue encontradodentro de un hfbitat de bosque.Actualmente poca informacitn indica si los afectos de la administraci6nde bosquesson negativoo positivoen el especie.Aunque parece que un poco de pruebascon reduccitn de poblacionesen fireasespecificas geogrfficamente, estos impactos estrin atri- buido a la falta de vegetaci6ncerca de los rios, conversi6nde fireasde forraje a parcela agricolas,y repoblacitn forestalde hfbitat abiertos.La eco-morfologiadel buho evocauna especieque ocupa el campo abierto. Tambitn, su cornidaprincipipal es mamiferospequefios (i.e. microfine y roedor het- eronmyid) que ocupan camposabiertos. •Debe ser el bfiho consideradoun bfiho del bosque?Infor- maci6n investigadasugieren que no, sin embargo,estudios de bosqueconifero y de hoja caducaextensa es necesaria. [Traducci6n de Rafil De La Garza, Jr.] The Long-eared Owl (Asio otus)is a widely dis- Long-eared Owl has been considered an open tributed Holarctic species,with six recognizedsub- country species, inhabiting areas such as grass- species (Cramp 1985). In the Northern Hemi- lands, shrubsteppe,marshes and woodland patches sphere, it ranges from approximately30-65 ø lati- near open areas.Most studiesseem to support this. tude, with isolated populationsoccurring in North To my knowledge,there have been no attemptsto and East Africa, the Azores and Canary Islands evaluatethe affectsof forestrypractices on this spe- (Mikkola 1983, Marks et al. 1994). Someaspects of cies. Herein, I review the literature and use some Long-eared Owl natural history have been well inferencesfrom my ongoing 10 yrs of study to ad- studied in the U.S. and some European countries, dress some of the questions concerning the im- but most studies have been short in duration, av- pacts of forest management on Long-eared Owls. eraging about two seasons. POPULATION TRENDS In North America, two subspeciesare currently recognized (A. o. wilsonianusand A. o. tuftsi;see Few data exist for population trends of Long- Marks et al. 1994 for further discussion). The cared Owls in North America over the past 10, 25, 175 176 HOLT VOL. 31, No. 2 Table 1. Statusof the Long-eared Owl in North America. PROVINCE/REGION OR STATE STATUS POPULATION TREND a CANADA (Fyfe 1976) British Columbia Low Unknown Maritime Low/Medium Fluctuating NorthwestTerritory/Yukon Unknown Unknown Ontario/Quebec Low/Medium Fluctuating Prairie Low/Medium Fluctuating NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES (Melvin et al. 1989) Connecticut Special Concern Delaware Unknown Massachusetts Special Concern Maryland Decreased Maine Unknown New Hampshire Special Concern New Jersey Unknown New York Unknown Pennsylvania Decreased Rhode Island Special Concern Vermont Special Concern MIDWEST (Petersen 1991) Illinois Endangered Unknown Indiana Uncommon Declining Iowa Threatened Unknown Kansas Uncommon Stable Michigan Special Concern Unknown Minnesota Regular Unknown Missouri Special Concern Unknown Nebraska Unknown Unknown North Dakota SpecialConcern Unknown Ohio Unknown Unknown South Dakota Rare Declining Wisconsin Special Concern Unknown WEST (Marti and Marks 1989) California SpecialConcern Declining Colorado Common Stable Idaho Common Unknown Montana Special Concern Unknown Nevada Common Stable Oregon Common Stable Utah Common Unknown Washington Unknown Unknown Wyoming Common Unknown Trend data not known tbr northeastern U.S. 50 or 100 yrs, but there are some regional data. ada; or 50 detections in the U.S. and Canada The Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) does not include (Droege pers. comm.). the Long-eared Owl in its data set from 1966-89. In Canada, Fyfe (1976) reported population For inclusion, a speciesmust have been detected trends and relative abundanceof raptorsfor prov- on >10 BBS routes in a physiographicregion; 25 incesor specificgeographic areas (Table 1). There or more detections in the three biomes (Eastern, were no data to support these designations.Also Central, Western); 35 or more detections in Can- in Canada, Christmas Bird Count (CBC) results Ju•E 1997 LO•O-EAR•DOW• CO•$ERV^q:•O• 177 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15, 10. 5 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 YEARS Figure 1. Summary of winter counts of Long-eared Owls from Christmas Bird Counts in the northeastern U.S., 1963-87 (after Melvin et al. 1989). showed a significant decline in Long-eared Owl ern states, Melvin et al. (1989) concluded that no numbers,but thesedata shouldbe interpreted cau- clear population trend could be detectedfor Long- tiously (Kirk et al. 1994). eared Owls, although numbers seemedto fluctuate In the northeastern U.S., Melvin et al. (1989) about every three to six yr (Fig. 1). In New Jersey, reported that the Long-earedOwl was listed as a Bosakowskiet al. (1989, 1989a) analyzed 31 yr speciesof special concern in all the New England (1956-86) of Long-eared Owl Christmas Count states except Maine and decreasingin Maryland Data reporting one or more Long-eared Owls and and Pennsylvania(Table 1). Within the northeast- concludedthat the specieswas declining (Fig. 2). 30- 10- -- = Owls/I,000 party hrs 0 ø Total Owls 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 8'8 Year Figure 2. Long-earedOwls reported on New JerseyChristmas Bird Counts (dotted line) and per 1000 party hours (solid line). Regressionline (dashed), Y = -0.70x + 25.5, P < 0.0001, r -- 0.67 for party hours is significant. Regressionline, Y = -0.629x + 31.9, P = 0.005, for total owls had a lower correlation (r = 0.50) (after Bosakowski et al. 1989a). 178 HOLT VOL. 31, NO. 2 In the midwestern U.S., Petersen (1991) report- pairs intensively monitored for 9 consecutiveyr, ed that Long-eared Owls have declined in Indiana only 11 males and two females have returned to and South Dakota, are stable in Kansas and are of the same breeding site more than once. Addition- unknown status elsewhere (Table 1). This was ally, no mate fidelity has been recorded. These based on state and regional birding publications data buttressthe argument for highly migratory and raptor surveyforms. In Minnesota, however, and nomadic tendencies in Long-eared Owls. Evans (in Marks et al. 1994) noted a decline in mi- grant Long-earedOwls in his studyarea from 1976- PRIMARY FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG-EARED OWL POPULATION TRENDS 93 (Fig. 3). In the western U.S., White (1994) reported the In most cases, there were insufficient data to Long-eared Owl as stable, but with some local convincingly conclude which /hctors influence lossesin the far west. He did not report how these population trends. Population declines have been speciesdesignations were assigned.Marfi and Marks attributed to habitat alteration, forest succession, (1989) reported a Long-earedOwl population de- urbanization, competition with Great Horned Owls cline in California and a stable or unknown popu- (Bubovirginianus), loss of habitat for prey species, lation status in the rest of the west (Table 1). In rodenticides (Bosakowskiet al. 1989a), shooting coastal southern California, Bloom (1994) has and habitat loss (Marks et al. 1994) and loss of shown the Long-eared Owl to have been extirpated riparian habitats and grasslands(Bloom 1994). in some areas,with small remnant populations still Some forestry practicesare also thought to have occurring inland. The number of historic nesting affected Long-eared Owls. In New Jersey, Bosa- areas have declined by 55% (Bloom 1994). In kowskiet al. (1989a) suggestedthat forest removal Montana, Long-eared Owls were listed as a species and thinning affected wintering Long-eared Owls of specialconcern (Marti and Marks 1989). I have and caused them to abandon the area. shown yearly fluctuationsin numbers during CBC On the contrary, many of the nonbreeding
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Diet of Three Sympatric Owls in Steppe Habitats of Eastern Kazakhstan
    256 SHORT COMMUNICATIONS VOL. 37, NO. 3 Comfin en Espafia y Portugal (I Censo Coordinado). (Oypaetusbarbaras) en Catalufia (NE Espafia) e imph- Afio 2000. Monograf/a nø 8. SEO/BirdLife, Madrid, caciones sobre su conservacitn. Do•ana Acta Vertebr Spain. 24:235-243. DONAZAR,J.A. 1993. Los buitres ib•ricos. Biologla y con- PAm½ER,P.G., T.A. WAITE, AND M.D. DECKER. 1995. Kin- servacitn. J.M. Reyero, Madrid, Spain. ship and associationin communally roosting black --, O. CEBALLOS,AND J.L. TELLA. 1996. Communal vultures. Anita. Behar. 49:395-401. roostsof EgyptianVultures (Neophronpercnopterus): dy- RABENOLD, P.P. 1983. The communal roost in Black and namics and implicationsfor the speciesconservation. Turkey Vultures:an Information Center?Pages 303- Pages 189-201 in J. Muntaner and J. Mayol [EDS.], 321 in S.R. Wilbur and J.A. Jackson [EDS.], Vulture Biologia y Conservaci0n de las Rapaces Mediterr•- biology and management. Univ. of California Press, neas. Monografias No. 4 de la SEO, Madrid, Spain. Berkeley, CA U.S.A. ß 1987. Recruitment to food in black vultures: ev- --, c.J. PAI,ACIOS,L. GANOOSO,O. CEBALLOS,M.J. GONZ./•LEZ,AND F. HIRALDO. 2002. Conservation status idence for following from communal roosts.Anita. Be- hay. 35:1775-1785. and limiting factorsin the endangeredpopulation of TELLA,J.L. 1991. Dormideros de alimoches en el Valle EgyptianVulture (Neophronpercnopterus) in the Canary Islands. Bid. Conserv. 107:89-98. Medio del Ebro. ActasI CongresoInternacional sobre Aves Carrofieras: 69-74. AEDENAT-CODA, Madrid, MAROAL•D^,A. 1997. Aparici6n de un dormidero comu- Spain. nal de Alimoche (Neophronpercnopterus) en Catalufia ß 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • A Type of Owl Called Asio Flammeus
    ADW: Asio flammeus: Information Page I of 8 -i - • Structured Inquiry Searct Home > Kingdom Animalia Phylum Chordata A Subphylum Vertebrata 0 Class Aves > Order Strigiformes P Family Strigidae > Species Asio flammeus Asio flammeus short-eared owl Information Pictures Classification 2008/0/20 02 :22:23. 076 IJS/Eastern By Nathan Doan Geographic Range Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Subphylum: Vertebrata Class: Aves Order: Strigiformes Family: Strigidae IGenus: Asio Species: Asio flammeus Short-eared owls are one of the world's most. widely distributed owls. They inhabit all of North and South America; this area includes the coast of the Arctic Ocean to Pantagonia. Short-eared owls can also be found on every continent except Australia and Antarctica. (Granlund et al., 1994; Welty, 1975;' Pearson, 1936) Biogeographic Regions: nearctic k (native CL); palearctic CL (native q); oriental Q. (native Q,); ethiopian CL (native k); neotropical q (native CL). Other Geographic Terms: cosmopolitan Q. Habitat One of the world's most widely distributed owls, Asio flammeus 'can be found throughout much of North America and Eurasia. These owls prefer to live inI marshes and bogs; they inhabit open, treeless areas. Their hunting and nesting habits Make them well suited to relatively flat land. This species is migratory but uses relativelY similar habitats during summer and winter. Short-eared owls have specialized eating habits and tend to stay http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich. edu/site/accounts/informationlAsio-flammeus.html 1/23/2008 ADW: Asio flammeus: Information Page 2 of 8 where they can find ample food. They will leave an area to find preferred prey rather than eat other animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Indicators of Biodiversity for Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management
    Essays Indicators of Biodiversity for Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management DAVID B. LINDENMAYER,* CHRIS R. MARGULES,† AND DANIEL B. BOTKIN‡ *Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies & Department of Geography, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia, email [email protected] †CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology, GPO Box 284, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia, email [email protected] ‡George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22202, and The Center for the Study of the Environment, P.O. Box 6945, Santa Barbara, CA 93160, U.S.A., email [email protected] Abstract: The conservation of biological diversity has become one of the important goals of managing for- ests in an ecologically sustainable way. Ecologists and forest resource managers need measures to judge the success or failure of management regimes designed to sustain biological diversity. The relationships between potential indicator species and total biodiversity are not well established. Carefully designed studies are re- quired to test relationships between the presence and abundance of potential indicator species and other taxa and the maintenance of critical ecosystem processes in forests. Other indicators of biological diversity in forests, in addition or as alternatives to indicator species, include what we call structure-based indicators. These are stand-level and landscape-level (spatial) features of forests such as stand structural complexity and plant species composition, connectivity, and heterogeneity. Although the adoption of practices to sustain (or recreate) key characteristics of forest ecosystems appear intuitively sensible and broadly consistent with cur- rent knowledge, information is lacking to determine whether such stand- and landscape-level features of for- ests will serve as successful indices of (and help conserve) biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Character Taxonomic Review, Systematics, and Biogeography of the Black- Capped/Tawny-Bellied Screech Owl (Megascops Atricapilla-M
    Zootaxa 4949 (3): 401–444 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4949.3.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2CAB47C9-2109-45DA-8F02-50D74D593DF2 Multi-character taxonomic review, systematics, and biogeography of the Black- capped/Tawny-bellied Screech Owl (Megascops atricapilla-M. watsonii) complex (Aves: Strigidae) SIDNEI M. DANTAS1,2, JASON D. WECKSTEIN3,4, JOHN BATES5, JOICIANE N. OLIVEIRA2,6, THERESE A. CATANACH4 & ALEXANDRE ALEIXO2,7* 1Zoology Graduate Program, Universidade Federal do Pará/Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Belém-PA, Brazil. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2281-0819 2Department of Zoology, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Belém-PA, Brazil. 3Department of Ornithology, Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University, 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, PA, USA 19096. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3850-1196 4Department of Biodiversity, Earth and Environmental Science, Drexel University, 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, PA, USA 19096. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7941-5724 5Negaunee Integrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 S Lake Shore Drive Chicago, IL, USA 60605. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5809-5941 6Graduate Program in Environmental Biology, Universidade Federal do Pará, Bragança-PA, Brazil. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0496-7510 7Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. *Corresponding author. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7816-9725 Abstract Megascops is the most species-rich owl genus in the New World, with 21 species currently recognized.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Birds of Cuba
    ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE BIRDS OF CUBA Number 3 2020 Nils Navarro Pacheco www.EdicionesNuevosMundos.com 1 Senior Editor: Nils Navarro Pacheco Editors: Soledad Pagliuca, Kathleen Hennessey and Sharyn Thompson Cover Design: Scott Schiller Cover: Bee Hummingbird/Zunzuncito (Mellisuga helenae), Zapata Swamp, Matanzas, Cuba. Photo courtesy Aslam I. Castellón Maure Back cover Illustrations: Nils Navarro, © Endemic Birds of Cuba. A Comprehensive Field Guide, 2015 Published by Ediciones Nuevos Mundos www.EdicionesNuevosMundos.com [email protected] Annotated Checklist of the Birds of Cuba ©Nils Navarro Pacheco, 2020 ©Ediciones Nuevos Mundos, 2020 ISBN: 978-09909419-6-5 Recommended citation Navarro, N. 2020. Annotated Checklist of the Birds of Cuba. Ediciones Nuevos Mundos 3. 2 To the memory of Jim Wiley, a great friend, extraordinary person and scientist, a guiding light of Caribbean ornithology. He crossed many troubled waters in pursuit of expanding our knowledge of Cuban birds. 3 About the Author Nils Navarro Pacheco was born in Holguín, Cuba. by his own illustrations, creates a personalized He is a freelance naturalist, author and an field guide style that is both practical and useful, internationally acclaimed wildlife artist and with icons as substitutes for texts. It also includes scientific illustrator. A graduate of the Academy of other important features based on his personal Fine Arts with a major in painting, he served as experience and understanding of the needs of field curator of the herpetological collection of the guide users. Nils continues to contribute his Holguín Museum of Natural History, where he artwork and copyrights to BirdsCaribbean, other described several new species of lizards and frogs NGOs, and national and international institutions in for Cuba.
    [Show full text]
  • (Tyto Alba) and Long-Eared Owl (Asio Otus) Mortality Along Motorways in Bourgogne-Champagne: Report and Suggestions
    Barn Owl (Tyto alba) and Long-Eared Owl (Asio otus) Mortality Along Motorways in Bourgogne-Champagne: Report and Suggestions Hugues Baudvin1 The purpose of the study was to find where 305 km of motorways, from Dijon (Burgundy) and why two species of owls were killed by to Toul (Lorraine) and from Dijon to Saint- traffic along motorways. Three different factors Thibault (Champagne). Because of lack of have an important influence on the mortality of data, 46.1 km of road were not evaluated the two owl species: the biotops crossed by (discontinuous line figure 2). The distance motorways, the road elevation and the presence of small rodents, the Common Vole (Microtus arvalis) being most numerous. In order to limit the mortality caused by motorways, it is proposed to let the bordering vegetation grow naturally. Roadway-caused mortality of wildlife is a significant issue worldwide. Often, the impacts to wildlife occur along specific portions of roadways. Surveys along the roadways can identify these portions and identify the wildlife species being the most greatly impacted. Then, the management of roadside vegetation can help to reduce this negative impact. STUDY AREA AND METHODS The study area is located in the northeast of France, over the regions of Burgundy, Champagne, and Lorraine (fig. 1). It concerns Figure 2.—Owl mortality on motorways studied in northeastern France. studied is exactly 517.8 km (258.9 x 2 sides of the motorway). The study was conducted from November 1991 to December 1995. Dead animals were collected systematically along the motorway three times daily. The animals were placed in plastic bags and frozen for positive identification.
    [Show full text]
  • Acoustic Location of Prey by Barn Owls {Tyto Alba) by Roger S
    J. Exp. Biol. (1971), 54. S3S-573 535 With 5 plates and 5 text-figures Printed in Great Britain ACOUSTIC LOCATION OF PREY BY BARN OWLS {TYTO ALBA) BY ROGER S. PAYNE Rockefeller University and New York Zoological Society (Received 20 January 1970) INTRODUCTION The external ears of many species of owls are asymmetrical (Ridgeway, 1914; Stell- bogen, 1930). Although the asymmetry may involve the modification of different structures in different species (Stellbogen, 1930) the result is usually the same: one ear has its opening above the horizontal plane, the other below it. Though Pumphrey (1948), Southern (1955) and others have suggested that the asymmetrical ears of owls may be useful in hunting, prey location by hearing was first demonstrated by Payne & Drury (1958). Work prior to that time had suggested that, in the wild, light levels must often fall below that at which owls can see their prey, thus forcing them to rely upon some non-visual sense in hunting. Dice (1945) calculated the minimum intensi- ties of light required by the barn owl (Tyto alba), the long-eared owl (Asio otus), the barred owl (Strix varia), and the burrowing owl (Speotyto cunicularia) to see a dead mouse from a distance of 6 ft. His rough calculations of the reduction of light due to the absence of the moon, the shade of trees and shrubs, and various degrees of cloud cover led him to conclude that '.. .in the natural habitat of owls the intensity of illumination must often fall below the minimum at which the birds can see their prey'.
    [Show full text]
  • Short-Eared Owl (Asio Flammeus) Joseph Youngman Status: State Endangered
    Short-eared Owl (Asio flammeus) Joseph Youngman Status: State Endangered Washtenaw Co., MI 12/21/2007 © Bruce Bowman (ClickHU to view a comparison of Atlas I to II) U Once seen flying low over open fields or During the MBBA I period, breeding was wetlands, the unique flight and appearance of confirmed in Chippewa County and probable the Short-eared Owl are not soon forgotten. One breeding was recorded in Isabella, Gratiot and of the most widespread owls in the world, its Lapeer. Between atlases there were midsummer North American breeding range extends from reports of Short-eared Owl from Osceola, northern Alaska and Canada south to California, Chippewa, Menominee (Whaley 1993), Huron Illinois, Indiana and Ohio. Individuals in the (Kielb 1996), Houghton (Byrne 2001), and northern part of its range are short to medium Benzie Counties (Byrne 2002) and confirmed distance migrants. It has been a rare breeder breeding records from Hillsdale County in 1996 and an uncommon migrant in Michigan. (Reinoehl 1997) and Monroe in 2000 (McWhirter 2001). The Monroe County record Distribution was a report of a Short-eared Owl nest with In a heavily forested state like Michigan, warm eggs on 15 February at Pt. Mouillee SGA, suitable breeding areas for the Short-eared Owl a very early nest date after an unusually warm are generally scarce. Extensive forest clearing winter. In Chippewa County throughout the state in the 1800s and early breeding/summering was noted in 2000 and 1900s may have provided some increased 2001 (Corace 2007) with an adult seen carrying breeding habitat, but more intensive modern food both years (Greg Corace pers.
    [Show full text]
  • SHORT-EARED OWL (Asio Flammeus) Don Roberson
    II SPECIES ACCOUNTS Andy Birch PDF of Short-eared Owl account from: Shuford, W. D., and Gardali, T., editors. 2008. California Bird Species of Special Concern: A ranked assessment of species, subspecies, and distinct populations of birds of immediate conservation concern in California. Studies of Western Birds 1. Western Field Ornithologists, Camarillo, California, and California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento. Studies of Western Birds No. 1 SHORT-EARED OWL (Asio flammeus) Don Roberson Criteria Scores Population Trend 10 Range Trend 5 Population Size 7.5 Range Size 5 Endemism 0 Population Concentration 0 Threats 10 + ? + ? ? Current Breeding Range Historic Breeding Range + + Recent Extralimital Breeding ? Status Uncertain County Boundaries Water Bodies Kilometers 100 50 0 100 Current and historic (ca. 1944) breeding range of the Short-eared Owl in California. Breeding is most regular in northeastern California and in Suisun Marsh, and mainly irregular or extralimital elsewhere, particularly on the immediate southern coast. Breeding numbers have declined at least moderately, but sparse historical information on the species’ distributional limits, and cyclic or episodic breeding in many areas, make it difficult to assess changes in the overall breeding range. Although fluctuating greatly annually, numbers are generally greatest during migration and winter, when birds occur more widely in lowland areas of the state. 242 Studies of Western Birds 1:242–248, 2008 Species Accounts California Bird Species of Special Concern SPECIAL CONCERN PRIORITY coast is a 2 July 1920 record for the “Estero” in Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara County (Lehman Currently considered a Bird Species of Special 1994), and observations by J.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Owls Oz Horine
    Israel's Owls Oz Horine Israel is at the junction of three continents: Europe, Asia & Africa. Many birds' migration paths pass straight though Israel twice a year: each spring about half a billion birds migrate through the country northwards to the breeding areas, and each autumn they move to their wintering areas to the south. The continental bridge effect also means that Israel has more birds than expected - about 540 species. Hume's Tawny Owl For some of these, Israel is the northern distribution boundary; for others the southern. Pallid Scops Owl Owls trip to Israel can be combined with other fascinating birding sights such as thethousands of migratory raptors soaring and gliding, a mix of many other passing-by birds in different habitats, a morning drinking ritual of sandgrouses (several species) as well as other desert birds, seabirds in the Red and Mediterranean Seas, Nightjars (Egyptian, Nubian and Eurasian) and lots more. Some birds are resident but many need specific timing. Most of Israel’s owls can be found throughout the year, although in different months some are easier to be found. Out of Israel's TEN owl species, the "desert" ones are the most interesting to overseas visitors: Hume's Tawny Owl ( Strix butleri ), Pharaoh Eagle Owl (Bubo ascalaphus ) and Pallid Scops Owl ( Otus brucei ). Long Eared Owl Hume’s Tawny Owl & Pharoah Eagle Owl are resident, while PSO is a rare winter visitor. So if you are interested in seeing all three of these unique owls, then December, January or February are the best months for your Israeli Owling tour.
    [Show full text]
  • Short-Eared Owl (Asio Flammeus): a Technical Conservation Assessment
    Short-eared Owl (Asio flammeus): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project September 22, 2004 David A. Wiggins, Ph.D. Strix Ecological Research 1515 Classen Drive Oklahoma City, OK 73106 Peer Review Administered by Society for Conservation Biology Wiggins, D. (2004, September 22). Short-eared Owl (Asio flammeus): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/ shortearedowl.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank Denver Holt for sending (on short notice) a number of critical publications on short-eared owls, and Karen Wiebe for providing a copy of her unpublished, undergraduate research report. Greg Hayward, Jeff Marks, Carl Marti, and Gary Patton read the entire manuscript and gave many useful tips for enhancing the structure and quality of this assessment. AUTHOR’S BIOGRAPHY David Wiggins developed an early interest in ornithology. During his high school years, he worked as a museum assistant under George Sutton at the University of Oklahoma. He later earned degrees from the University of Oklahoma (B.Sc. in Zoology), Brock University (M.Sc.- Parental care in Common Terns, under the supervision of Ralph Morris), and Simon Fraser University (Ph.D. – Selection on life history traits in Tree Swallows, under the supervision of Nico Verbeek). This was followed by a U. S. National Science Foundation Post-doctoral fellowship at Uppsala University in Sweden, where he studied life history evolution in Collared Flycatchers, and later a Fulbright Fellowship working on the reproductive ecology of tits (Paridae) in Namibia and Zimbabwe.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Diet of the Long-Eared Owl Asio Otus (Strigiformes: Strigidae) in the Grasslands of Janos, Chihuahua, Mexico José I
    González-Rojas et al. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural (2017) 90:1 Revista Chilena de DOI 10.1186/s40693-017-0064-3 Historia Natural SHORTREPORT Open Access Winter diet of the long-eared owl Asio otus (Strigiformes: Strigidae) in the grasslands of Janos, Chihuahua, Mexico José I. González-Rojas*, Hernaldo Padilla-Rangel, Irene Ruvalcaba-Ortega, Miguel A. Cruz-Nieto, Ricardo Canales-del-Castillo and Antonio Guzmán-Velasco Abstract Background: The long-eared owl (Asio otus) has a Holarctic distribution, including much of North America. This nocturnal species is considered to be extremely secretive, and poorly known in the Great Plains of the United States and Canada, as well as to México, where no previous studies on its diet have been conducted. Findings: We analyzed 120 pellets collected during January 2007 in roosts in a 2–3 m height mesquite scrub within a grassland area of Reserva Ecológica El Uno, located in the Natural Protected Area Janos. We registered and identified three orders, four families, eight genera and ten species of mammals and two orders and one family of insects. Winter diet is dominated by mammals, especially rodents in both frequency and biomass. Cricetidae and Perognathus flavus were the most frequent family and species, respectively. On the other hand, when analyzing biomass, Sigmodon species were dominant, achieving almost 70% of the consumed biomass. Levin's standardized niche breath based on frequency was calculated as 0.40, while based on biomass was 0.38. Also, two previously unrecorded rodent species were identified as long-eared owl prey. Conclusion: Although 18 different types of items were identified, the long-eared owl tends to be selective, with a single genera (Sigmodon) comprising almost 70% of its consumed biomass during winter.
    [Show full text]