2010 Markham Budget

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2010 Markham Budget 2010 BUDGET Town of Markham Ontario, Canada Cover photo Canadian fl ag collage: Cover images represent the four pillars of the Town of Markham’s Community Sustainability Plan — • Healthy Environment • Economic Vitatilty • Social Equity • Vibrant Culture EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We are pleased to present the 2010 Operating, Capital, Building Standards, Engineering, Planning & Design and Waterworks Budgets for the Town of Markham. After extensive discussion and planning involving residents, community and business groups, Council and staff have produced a balanced budget which addresses the social needs of the community, and maintains service levels with a zero percent net tax rate increase in the municipal portion for the second consecutive year. Vital Markham services such as fire protection, waste management and roads services have been supported at 2009 levels. The Town of Markham approved the following 2010 Budgets, totalling $316.2 million: Operating $ 153.8 million Capital $ 77.9 million Building Standards $ 7.2 million Engineering $ 5.1 million Planning & Design $ 4.9 million Waterworks $ 67.3 million Operating Budget The table below reconciles the 2009 Approved Operating Budget (revised to exclude Planning & Design and Engineering along with Building and Waterworks to match 2010) to the 2010 Operating Budget from $151,268,685 to $153,807,527 (figures exclude prior years surplus/deficit): REVENUES Approved 2009 Budget Revenues 151,268,685 2010 Assessment Growth - Tax Revenue 2,105,491 2010 Increase in Investment Income 1,000,000 2010 Adjustments in Other Revenues -566,649 Total 2010 Budget Revenues (excluding prior year surplus/deficit) 153,807,527 EXPENDITURES Approved 2009 Budget Expenditures 151,268,685 2010 Increase in Expenditures 4,276,977 2010 Additional Transfer to the Capital Programs 500,000 HST Provision for Operating and Capital Budgets 355,000 Reduction in Tax-Funded Capital -2,593,135 Total 2010 Budget Expenditures (excluding prior year surplus/defic 153,807,527 At a high level, a lot of work, meetings and inputs are considered in developing the Town’s budget. The preliminary budget was developed with information from a forecast of 2010 economic pressures. All Town departments prepared business plans that were i incorporated into the preliminary budget. The Town of Markham continues to face inflationary pressures in many aspects of its operations. General inflation, waste collection and winter maintenance contracts, other contract renewals, and wage settlements have resulted in increased operating expenditures. Further, the Budget Sub-Committee approved the continuation of the Town's practice of phasing-in future personnel costs related to facility openings and funds have been allocated towards the Cornell Fire Station, the next Library/Recreation facility and a future sports facility. In addition to inflationary pressures, Markham continues to add to its inventory of parks, streetlights, and roads each year, thereby requiring additional resources for the maintenance and replacement of these assets. These pressures increased expenditures in 2010 by $6.1M. Staff continued the Excellence through Efficiency and Effectiveness initiative (E3) that focuses on corporate wide business transformation. This initiative has become an integral part of the annual business planning process and through this process many processes have been reviewed to find expenditure reductions as well increased revenues. To mitigate the increased expenditures, Staff reviewed and identified the following expenditure reductions: $0.5M by reduction in the utility budget through lower consumption resulting from Town-initiated energy efficient programs $0.2M reduction in the Town’s fuel budget due to lower consumption and a price analysis $0.3M from a phase-in of winter maintenance requirements Further, $2.6M reduction in tax-funded capital budget was achieved through the following measures: $1.0M was saved through the development of a pavement preservation strategy. This strategic initiative preserves the roads by proactively treating the surface early in its life to prolong its state of good repair. In fact, this method strengthens the roads during the rehabilitation for longer life and it employs green technologies to reduce emissions, save energy and recycle aggregates and asphalt $0.8M by deferring and/or sustainable reductions in the capital program $0.5M use of alternative funding source (gas tax) $0.3M by extending the life cycle of Town owned fleet The total impact of the above described pressures, totalling $6.1M, and listed reductions, totalling $3.6M, on expenditures is $2.5M. Also, the revenues were reviewed and increased by $2.5M in the areas of assessment growth and investment income along with adjustments to other revenues. ii The net of the expenditures and revenues is a balanced budget and, thus, a zero percent tax rate increase for the second consecutive year. Capital Budget The 2010 Capital Budget of $77.9M includes funding from various sources. The 2010 Capital budget includes $4.2M from the Federal Gas Tax grant, which will fund capital projects in the following areas: Facility Energy Retrofits Curb & Sidewalk Repairs Green Print Community Sustainability Plan Culvert Replacement Civic Centre Conversion to MDE Connection, and Storm Sewers Upgrades In addition, the Town received funding from the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund in the amount of $8.8M and the Recreation Infrastructure Fund in the amount of $5.1M. The Infrastructure Stimulus Fund is being used to fund the following projects: Facility Accessibility Retrofits ($2.1M) Facility Energy Retrofits ($2.0M) Emergency Operations Centre Retrofit ($0.7M) Thornhill Community Centre & Library Renovations/Additions ($4.0M) The Recreation Stimulus Fund is being used to fund the following projects; Saint Roberts Artificial Turf and Bubble ($2.0M) Tennis Court Facility at Angus Glen Community Centre & Library ($1.1M) Outdoor Civic Centre Skating Rink ($2.0M) Other significant Capital projects include the continuation of the tree planting initiative, construction of the Cornell Fire Station, erosion protection and stormwater management projects, waste management initiatives (including new and continuing recycling programs), continuation of Travel Demand Management, design & construction of 6 new parks, town-wide illumination & sidewalk requests, rehabilitation of bridges & culverts, road rehabilitation across the Town, watermain and sanitary sewer construction & replacement, facility improvements at town-owned buildings, permanent washrooms on Markham Main Street, a pool sanitization upgrade at Milliken Mills pool, and the continuation of the facility accessibility program. The 2010 Budget reflects the Town’s commitment to maintain service levels to the community and balances social needs with fiscal prudence. This is a reflection of the Town’s commitment towards fiscal stewardship. Further, consistent with existing Town policies, one-time funding is not used to balance the operating budget and the Town's iii commitment to increase contribution to the capital program by $0.5M is maintained. The Town has also continued to ramp-up the operating budget for future expenditures related to new community centres, libraries and fire Stations. In addition, the Town will be contributing a total of $0.75M to the Land Acquisition and Environmental Land Acquisition Reserve Funds. Building Markham’s Future Together and Strategic Focus Markham has experienced dramatic growth and change during the past decade – and the Town needs to prepare for and manage this change in the years ahead. In 2007, recognizing that we must take the right steps today to prepare for the future, Markham Council and senior staff identified six strategic priorities for Markham. The Town’s goal is to ensure that Markham continues to be a vibrant, successful and sustainable community. First, to check that the Town was on the right track, the Town launched Click with Markham, an innovative award-winning program. The Town asked residents, people who work in Markham and other stakeholders, to share their thoughts on the Town’s strategic priorities, the action plans associated with each priority, and any concerns the Town may have overlooked. More than 5,000 people responded, making Click with Markham one of the most successful programs of its kind in Ontario. Based on this feedback, Council developed Markham’s official strategic direction for the coming years. The Town’s top six strategic priorities include: Growth Management: Design and construction of new parks, the continuation of a Town Directed Growth Strategy, and supporting the development of a Markham Centre Open Space Plan design guideline. Transportation/Transit: New road constructions and road improvements, more street lighting and sidewalks, a Markham Cycling and Pathways system, and the continued implementation of Markham Transportation Demand Management (TDM) initiatives. Environment: Development of a Markham GreenPrint strategy that will further protect the Town’s air, land, water, vegetation, wildlife and all living species and funding for a major tree planting initiative. Investments are also made for additional Stormwater Management Ponds, installing geothermal heating at the Town Civic Centre supplied by Markham District Energy, and the continuation of the Markham Trees for Tomorrow initiative. Municipal Services: Investments are made on various Road Resurfacing & Improvement projects, maintenance and repair at municipal buildings
Recommended publications
  • Affordability, Transit, and Housing: a Case Study of Vivanext on Yonge Street in Richmond
    Affordability, Transit, and Housing: A case study of Vivanext on Yonge Street in Richmond Hill and Newmarket by Goretti Maria Mpaka supervised by Dr. Jennifer Foster A Major Paper submitted to the Faculty of Environmental Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Environmental Studies York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Date November 30, 2016 1 Abstract The GTA has experienced population growth in the past decade, and the majority of this growth is attributed to immigration. As municipalities push for more sustainable ways to travel, it is crucial that it is done in a just and equitable manner that caters to the diversity in cities. This includes cost effective means of travel for children, the elderly, families, low income communities, people with disabilities, and also the working population. There are many overlaps in these groups and they should not be considered as separate groups, for instance a working woman may have low income or high income. To fully harness the benefits of transit systems, walkable, compact and mixed use developments in proximity to transit stations have been suggested in the form of Transit-oriented Development (TOD). Transit and housing are big indicators of affordable neighborhoods. TOD has added to the equation of affordability in YR because of the low numbers of affordable housing along major transit corridors and Stations. York Region is becoming highly unaffordable, especially for low and moderate income earner. Policy solutions should not only cater for low income families but also alleviate the challenges of moderate income earners who spend more than 50% of their household income on housing.
    [Show full text]
  • Accessible Transit Services in Ontario
    Accessible transit services in Ontario Discussion paper ISBN – 0-7794-0652-4 Approved by the Commission: January 16, 2001 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 5 BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................. 5 PART I. TRANSIT AND HUMAN RIGHTS...................................................................... 7 1.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 7 1.2 THE ONTARIO HUMAN RIGHTS CODE.......................................................... 8 1.3 THE PROPOSED "ONTARIANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT" AND OTHER LEGISLATION ........................................................................................................... 10 1.4 CASE LAW ..................................................................................................... 11 1.5 THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, 1990 (ADA)............................ 12 1.5.1 The ADA: Title II ...................................................................................... 13 PART II. METHODS OF ACHIEVING ACCESSIBILITY ............................................ 14 2.1 COMMUNITY BUSES AND SERVICE ROUTES............................................ 15 2.2 LOW FLOOR BUSES ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • This Month in Rail and Transit
    THIS MONTH IN RAIL AND TRANSIT 3 VIA TRAINS IN NORTHERN MANITOBA Come and ramble with David Hales, on VIA's threatened trains to Churchill. 4 THE YORK-DURHAM HERITAGE RAILV7AY S.I. Westland gives the details of Southern NUMBER 536 - AUGUST 1994 Ontario's newest tourist railway. PUBLISHED BY 6 WORLD SPEED REVIEW '94 Upper Canada Railway Society Richard Carroll updates our annual survey of RO. Box 122, Station A fast trains around the world. Toronto, Ontario M5W IA2 8 MERGERS, NAMES, IDENTITIES DIRECTORY OF RAILWAYS It is again a time of mergers, consolidations, and new corporate identities in the railway EDITOR IN CANADA, 1994 Pat Scrlmgeour A complete listing of railways in Canada industry. America's largest railroad, Burling• ton Northern, plans to merge with perhaps 250 Queens Quay West #1607 10 the best-known, the Atchison, Topeka and Toronto, Ontario M5J 2N2 RESEARCH AND REVIEWS Santa Fe Railway. Further combinations may E-Mail: 731 [email protected] RAILWAY ARCHAEOLOGY . happen - Conrail and Norfolk Southern, ... The "Valley Railway" Union Pacific and Chicago & North Western, CONTRIBUTING EDITORS INFORMATION NETWORK . even (don't hold your breath) selected parts John Carter, Art Clowes, . CN's Panorama vs. VIA's Canadian of CP and CN. Scott Haskill, Don McQueen, 13 New railways need new names, and here, Sean Robltaille, Gray Scrimgeour, TRANSCONTINENTAL extracted from the many helpful, even frivol• Chris Spinney, Gordon Webster THE RAPIDO ... The W&H begins operations ous, suggestions from a railfan electronic . HH-US strike update forum, are possible identities for the com• . CN derailments Please send news and short contributions to bined BN and ATSF: THE PANORAMA Rail passengers in B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Ordinated Street Furniture Urban Design Guidelines
    Co-ordinated Street Furniture Urban Design Guidelines Endorsed by Regional Council on June 25, 2009 PREPARED FOR> THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK PREPARED BY> STLA DESIGN STRATEGIES Design Strategies IN CONSULTATION WITH R.E. MILLWARD & ASSOCIATES Co-ordinated Street Furniture Urban Design Guidelines YRT York Region Transit TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0> INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Context .................................................................... 2 1.2 Regional Policies Related to Public Realm .................... 4 1.3 Purpose of Design Guidelines ..................................... 5 1.4 Street Furniture Best Practices ................................... 6 2.0> DESIGN VISION / OBJECTIVES 7 2.1 Design Principles ....................................................... 8 3.0> STREET FURNITURE 9 3.1 Transit Shelters ....................................................... 10 3.2 Stand-alone Benches ............................................... 13 3.3 Bicycle Racks ......................................................... 14 3.4 Waste / Recycling Receptacles ................................. 15 3.5 Newspaper Box Organizers ...................................... 16 3.6 Multi-Publication Units .............................................. 17 3.7 Schedule Display Cases ........................................... 18 3.8 Community Information Kiosks ................................. 19 3.9 Advertising ............................................................. 20 4.0> HERITAGE / SPECIAL CHARACTER AREAS 21 5.0> TRANSIT STOP SITE DESIGN 22 Site
    [Show full text]
  • Report 7, September 4, 2002
    1 Report No. 7 of the Transit Committee THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK REPORT NO. 7 OF THE REGIONAL TRANSIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 4, 2002 For Consideration by The Council of The Regional Municipality of York on September 19, 2002 Chair: Regional Councillor Diane Humeniuk, Chair Members: Regional Councillor Barrow Regional Councillor Joyce Frustaglio Mayor Tim Jones Regional Councillor Scarpitti Regional Chair B. Fisch Also Present: Mayor Wayne Emmerson Regional Councillor B. O'Donnell Staff Present: J. Barnes, P. Carlyle, S. Cartwright, M. Garrett, D. Gordon, P. May, E. Stevenson, K. Schipper, E. Wilson The Transit Committee began its meeting at 11:05 a.m. on September 4, 2002. 2 Report No. 7 of the Transit Committee TABLE OF CONTENTS Clause Page 1 YORK REGION TRANSIT 3 PERFORMANCE BASED OPERATING CONTRACTS 2 YORK REGION TRANSIT MOBILITY PLUS SERVICE 8 2001 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REVIEW 3 YORK REGION TRANSIT 20 ONTARIO TRANSIT RENEWAL PROGRAM – REQUEST FOR ALLOCATION OF RENEWAL FUNDS 4 YORK REGION TRANSIT 24 BUS ADVERTISING CONTRACTS FOR MARKHAM AND RICHMOND HILL AREAS 5 YORK REGION TRANSIT MOBILITY PLUS SERVICE 26 AMENDMENT TO VAUGHAN SERVICE AREA CONTRACT 6 YORK REGION TRANSIT MOBILITY PLUS SERVICE 28 WHITCHURCH-STOUFFVILLE SERVICE AREA CONTRACT 7 YORK REGION TRANSIT MOBILITY PLUS SERVICE 30 KING AND EAST GWILLIMBURY SERVICE AREA CONTRACTS 8 UPDATE – COMMITTEE PROCEEDINGS 32 3 Report No. 7 of the Transit Committee 1 YORK REGION TRANSIT PERFORMANCE BASED OPERATING CONTRACTS The Transit Committee recommends: 1. The presentation by Rick Takagi, Manager, Operations, be received; and 2. The recommendations contained in the following report, August 26, 2002, from the Commissioner of Transportation and Works be adopted, subject to: (a) inserting the word "enhanced" before "principles of performance" in Recommendation 1; and (b) amending the figures in the presentation document under "Financial Impact", bullet points 3 and 4, to read $65,000 and $59,000 respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Master Plan
    TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN Policy Papers CANSULT/MARSHALL MACKLIN MONAGHAN JOINT VENTURE in association with Cumming + Company Hemson Consulting Dalton Consulting R.M. Soberman CONSULTING ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS YORK REGION TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN POLICY PAPERS Table of Contents No. 1 Public Transit Tranplan October 2000 No. 2 Transportation System Marshall, Macklin, October 2000 Management & Intelligent Transportation Monaghan Systems No. 3 Transportation Demand Cansult October 2000 Management & Telecommuting No. 4 Air Quality & the Environment Cansult October 2000 No. 5 Goods Movement & the Economy Cansult October 2000 No. 6 Pedestrians & Cycling Marshall, Macklin, October 2000 Monaghan No. 7 Asset Management Marshall, Macklin, November 2000 Monaghan No. 8 Funding Hemson October 2000 Key Issues, Challenges and Strategic Options Cansult December 2000 A Transportation Vision for York Region Cansult April 2001 TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN Policy Paper No. 1 PUBLIC TRANSIT For Discussion Purposes Only October 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND......................................................................1 2.0 TRANSIT PLANNING & POLICY INITIATIVES .....................................................1 2.1 York Region Official Plan Policies...........................................................................1 2.2 Subsequent Transit Planning & Policy Initiatives ....................................................2 2.3 Progress to Date ....................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Data Validation Transportation Tomorrow Survey
    TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY 1996 DATA VALIDATION TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY 1996 DATA VALIDATION Prepared for the Toronto Area Transportation Planning Data Collection Steering Committee by the Data Management Group Joint Program in Transportation University of Toronto December 1997 Participating Agencies: Ministry of Transportation, Ontario · GO Transit · Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Toronto Transit Commission · Regional Municipality of Durham Regional Municipality of Halton · Regional Municipality of Hamilton-Wentworth Regional Municipality of Niagara · Regional Municipality of Peel Regional Municipality of Waterloo · Regional Municipality of York · Town of Orangeville Peterborough County · Simcoe County · Victoria County · Wellington County City of Barrie · City of Guelph · City of Peterborough CONTENTS SUMMARY 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 3 2.0 POTENTIAL SOURCES OF ERROR AND BIAS 3 2.1 Sample Frame 3 2.2 Timing of Sample Selection 4 2.3 Bias Due to Non Response 4 2.4 Under Reporting of Trips 4 2.5 Incorrect Information 5 3.0 DATA VALIDATION 5 3.1 Dwelling Units and Population 5 3.2 Age and Gender 9 3.3 School Enrollment 12 3.4 Traffic Volumes 15 3.5 Municipal Transit Ridership 18 3.6 GO Transit Ridership 27 TABLES AND CHARTS Table 1 - Comparison Of Expanded Totals By Municipality ..........................................................................6 Table 2 - Difference In Population Relative To The Census........................................................................11 Table 3 - Population Aged 18-27 ..................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Emerging Technologies in Public Transit in Greater Toronto Area Zaiem Haider Ryerson University
    Ryerson University Digital Commons @ Ryerson Theses and dissertations 1-1-2003 The future of emerging technologies in public transit in Greater Toronto Area Zaiem Haider Ryerson University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ryerson.ca/dissertations Part of the Mechanical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Haider, Zaiem, "The future of emerging technologies in public transit in Greater Toronto Area" (2003). Theses and dissertations. Paper 140. This Thesis Project is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Ryerson. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Ryerson. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTE TO USERS This reproduction is the best copy available. ® UMI THE FUTURE OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN PUBLIC TRANSIT IN GREATER TORONTO AREA by Zaiem Haider B.Sc. Eng., University of Engineering and Technology Lahore, Pakistan, 1993 A project presented to Ryerson University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Engineering in the Program of Civil Engineering Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2003 © Zaiem Haider, 2003 m~ i. ......, ~ I 1 .,.., 'f"O ,. D" P,\\ ~'.. :~I~ i'~ ~ \,;' i J ';.,., 'i,--,:. t ~ i~: ...'~.~J'-.J ~ 7 UMI Number: EC52882 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Towards Prosperity: How Transit Affects the Educational Trajectories of Students
    Planning Towards Prosperity: How Transit Affects the Educational Trajectories of Students Justine Nortey Date Submitted: July 28th, 2017 Supervisor: Dr. Roger Keil A Major Paper submitted to the Faculty of Environmental Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Environmental Studies. York University Toronto, Ontario, Canada I This page is intentionally left blank. II L I S T OF F I G U R E S Figure 1. Map of the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area……………………………………………………………3 Figure 2. Mayor David Miller’s Transit City Plan………………………………………………………………………….18 Figure 3. Toronto’s transit deserts and the three cities………………………………………………………………21 Figure 4. Transit Scores of the three cities………..……………………………………………………………………….22 Figure 5 Local Toronto and GTHA school trips by mode from 1986 to 2011……………………..……….47 Figure 6. GTHA Universities along rapid transit line……………………………………………………………………50 Figure 7. The Potential of Bike Share at the York University Keele Campus Area………………………..56 Figure 8 Chart of Mode Share of travel by campus ……………………………………………………………………64 Figure 9. Map of the distribution of transit pass ownership within the GTHA…………………………….65 Figure 10 Map of the home locations of student respondents within the GTHA………………………..68 Figure 11. Graph of the percentage of students commuting to campus daily…………………………….69 L I S T OF T A B L E S Table 1. Mode share percentage information………………………………………………………………..……………63 Table 2. Mobility tool ownership information………………………………………………………………………….….63 Table 3. Transit mode change
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Tomorrow Survey 2001 Data Validation
    TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY 2001 DATA VALIDATION TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY 2001 A Telephone Interview Survey on Household Travel Behaviour in Greater Toronto and the Surrounding Areas Conducted in the Fall of 2000, Fall of 2001 and Spring of 2002 DATA VALIDATION Prepared for the Transportation Information Steering Committee by the Data Management Group University of Toronto Joint Program in Transportation February 2003 Participating Agencies: Ministry of Transportation, Ontario • City of Barrie • City of Guelph City of Hamilton • City of Kawartha Lakes • City of Orillia • City of Peterborough City of Toronto • County of Peterborough • County of Simcoe • County of Wellington GO Transit • Regional Municipality of Durham • Regional Municipality of Halton Regional Municipality of Niagara • Regional Municipality of Peel Regional Municipality of York • Toronto Transit Commission • Town of Orangeville Table of Contents Summary .......................................................................................................................................1 1 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................3 2 Potential Sources of Error and Bias....................................................................................3 2.1 Sample Frame ................................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Timing of Sample Selection ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]