DOCSLIB.ORG

Competition for Water: International Case Studies of River Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Competition for Water: International Case Studies of River Management -~ ,,-, Verh. Internat. Verein. Lirnnol. 1581-1587 StUttgart,October 2002 Competition for water: international casestudies of river management and conflict resolution P. J. Boon, G. M. Gislason, P. S. Lake, B. K. Ellis, C. Frank and A. J. Boulton Introduction natural flow regime and to river ecology (e.g. E al . h d d c. HENRIQUES 1987). In this sense, the issue of sc atmg uman eman s ror rIver water m most . ... parts of the world are intensifying, resulting in competition for water is p:mcipally related to reducedor severelyaltered flows, hydrological alter- the need to protect or remstate natural flow ations of groundwater and surfacewater drainage regimes. It also calls for diversions of rivers to patterns, alienation of floodplain habitats and vary- other channels and submersion of land under ing degreesof water pollution. In competition with reservoirs. humans for this water is the 'environment', whose . water requirements are difficult to measure (e.g. In Ap~li 19~9, the M!~ister for Industry, m RICHTERet al. 1997) and, in many cases,even harder cooperation With the Mmister for the Environ- to defendagainst the pressuresof economicrational- ment in Iceland, set up a Master Plan for Hydro ism and social desires (PAlMERet al. 2000). Thereare and Geothermal Energy Resourcesand estab- innume.rable~xamples. of this competitio.nfor wat~r lished a steering committee. In February 2000, ,,:,orldwlde,with ,:,arym~degrees, of .SOCI~recogm- four working groups were established to evalu- tlon of the aquatic environment s rIghts to water .al h d I . d h al and its necessityfor the long-term survival of adja- ate potenti y roe ectnc an geot er~ cent ecosystems. developments. Th~ members. of each worki?g The SIL Working Group on the Conservationand group were appomted by mterested parties Managementof Running Watersbelieves that much (power companies, municipalities, farmers and can be learnt from eachother's experiences by com- tourist services) as well as educational and paring casestudies from different parts of the world, research institutes. The role of each group seeki~gparallels in successfulconflict resol';1tionor (com risin 5-13 ex erts) is to assessall sites aquatic ecosystem management methods m areas p g . p . I' where competition for water is intense.This paper that have potential for generatmg hydroe ectnc reviewssuch examples,varying in success,from Ice- and geothermal energy and to rank them land, eastern Australia, Montana, and Germany. according to their importance within each cate- Eachcontributor wasasked to briefly describea river gory. The groups deal with (1) nature conserva- syste~, the key competitorsfor water,the impact~of tion, landscape, history, and archaeology; (2) excessivewater use, and th~ ~urrent srtateFiYbeIng recreation, tourism, land use (especially graz- adopted to resolve competition.h. Information was . g) d c h fi h . (3) .al d also sought on the degree to w ICh rIver. water was m '..an rres water is enes'. ' . SOCi. an being allocatedback to the environmentby the other econ~~ic issues; and .(4) the identification ~d competitors,and the way in which the successof this defimtion of specific energy generation allocationwas being monitored. projects. The chairs of each group, in addition to experts in management, form a steering Hydroelectric and geothermal competition group chaired by a senior research director of for water in Icelandic rivers the National Energy Authority (LANOVERNO In Iceland, one of the main human require- 2001). ments for river water is for hydropower genera- In some cases,additional information will be tion. Whilst this consumes minimal amounts of obtained (e.g. vegetation maps, groundwater water, there may be substantial changes to the maps and species lists and relative abundance). 0368-0770/02/0028-1581 $1.75 @2002 E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 0-70176 Srurrgarr 1582 Verb.Internat. Verein. Limnol. 28 (2002) For very important areas(e.g. Ramsar sites), Rehabilitation of a river by an environmen- 'red flags'are applied to ensurethat they will be tal flow programme: the Snowy River, Aus- excluded from hydroelectric or geothermal tralia development. Finally, the steering committee The Snowy River risesnear the summit of Mt. will categorisethe proposals,identifying those Kosciuszko in the Snowy Mountains, south- that appearto be feasibleboth in terms of eco- easternAustralia, and flows south for approxi- nomic implications and environmental conse- mately 380 km to enter the seanear Orbost in quencesversus those that, for economicreasons Victoria. The river was a national icon, with and/or environmental consequences,should dramatic scenery,excellent cold- and warm- not be carried out. The result of this work will water fishing and a diversebiota varying from be a proposedmaster plan for the utilisation of that of a high montaneriver to that of a coastal hydro- and geothermalenergy resources.It is lowland river. In 1949, construction beganon expectedthat ca. 100 project proposalswill be the SnowyMountains Scheme,aiming to 'tame' evaluated.The steeringgroup expectsto finalise the rivers to generatehydropower and to divert the evaluationof the first 25 project proposals water inland to meet the insistent demandsof by the end of 2002 (LANDVERND2001). large-scaleirrigation. The schemetook 25 years .. to build and consists of 16 dams storing 7000 The method of ranking sItes accordmg to GL 145 km of trans-mountaintunnels, 80 km four key c~tegoriesaims to establisha consensus of diversion aqueducts,and sevenpower sta- on thosesItes or areasthat should undergoEIA tions. The schemelies almost entirely in the and those that should be left undevelopedand KosciuszkoNational Park so that nearly all of possiblyprotected under the Nature Conserva- the rivers in the park have been dammed or tion Act. In the past,a singleproposal would be diverted. Water ftom the Snowy River is stored made for hydroelectricor geothermaldevelop- in Lake Jindabynebehind the JindabyneDam ment that then underwent EIA without any and is diverted to the inland-flowing Murray alternativesbeing considered.Predictably, this River. The averagenet flow (ANF) of the river often causedlengthy disputesbetween environ- downstreamfrom JindabyneDam was reduced mentalistsand official environmentagencies on by 99% with a 'riparian release'of constant the one hand and the National Power Com- flow of only 10 GL year-I. Flow at the river pany and the Ministry for Industry on the mouth fell by 47% and the largesnowmelt-fed other. It also intensified political pressureon spring floods were eliminated. Consequently, the government'splanning agency,which evalu- the condition of the river habitatsand biota has atesthe EIA reports. deteriorateddownstream (BANKS et al. 1996). Th I I d. d I. "1 d I In 1993, the Council of Australian Govern- e. ce an lC m~ e IS slml ar to one eve - ments allowed corporatisation of the Snowy oped m Norway m the 1970s (NoRWE~IAN Mountains Hydro-Electric Authority, includ- ~INISTRYFOR THE E~RONME~ ~984), revIsed ing the setting of environmentalflow regimes. m t.he1990s, ~d stIll ~nder revIsIon.T~e eval- The Snowy Genoa Catchment Management uatlon sys.t~~IS dyn~lc. ~or example,If ~ new Committee commissionedan expert panel in way of utlhsmg a specIficrIver were to be Iden- 1995 to recommend an environmental flow tified .by a.voiding.a large reservoirin wetlands regime for the Snowy River below Jindabyne and dlvertmg the rIver through tunnels to other Dam. The panel comprisedexperts in hydrol- lessimportant areas,the river site can be con- ogy,fluvial geomorphology,riparian vegetation, sideredagain and reclassified.In this way, it is fish biology, and stream ecology (BANKSet al. hoped that a consensuswill be reachedbetween 1996). The panel'sapproach differed ftom pre- landowners,environmentalists and power com- vious methods of environmental flow assess- panieson which sitesand areasshould be con- ment. Instead of concentratingon setting sus- sidered for the development of hydropower tainable minimum flows, the recommended production. regime was set to maintain the critical flow P.J. Boonet al.,Aquatic ecosystem management systems 1583 componentsthat allowed survival in summer, spectacularscenery in the world, with views of the movement of biota (predominantly fish), the high peaksof GNP, a pristine trout river, the recruitment of riparian vegetation and, herdsof elk and frequent visits by grizzly bears, most importantly, the reshapingand replenish- and thus the potential for large commercial ment of habitat. Thus, a minimum summer development (hotels, condominiums) was flow, variable seasonalflows and an annual looming on the horiwn. Such development flood flow event were all set, giving a total would constitute intensifying human competi- regimeof 28% ANF (BANKSet al. 1996). It was tion for water in this otherwiseuntegulated and made clear that if the recommended flow 'wild' river. regimewere implemented, rigorous monitoring D h d d b th U . Th 1 f h 1, l:'-esearc con ucte y e nIVersity 0 f was necessary, e re ease 0 t e expert pane s M Fl h d Lak B. 1 .cal S ' al ( al 6) d d ' d ontana at ea e 10 Ogi tation propos s BANKS et ,199 pro uce conSI - h d h th . bl ' h N S h s owe t at e InteractIon zone between the era '_I e controversy, promptIng t e ew out, d h 'fi . d G ' . .. rIver an t e aqui er was extensIve an Wales overnment to commIssIon an InquIry ". ' 1998 d' ANF f 15O! dynamIc, BIogeochemIcal processes In the In recommen Ing an 0 70 . (SNOWYWATER INQUIRY 1998). Further negoti- hyporheI~ w?e ~ay naturally load ground ation resulted in a long-term target of 28% waters wIt~ bioavallable solutes that appear to ANF fi th S Ri exert proxImal controls on productIon and or e nowy ver, d. f . d . , .. Iversity 0 rIver COmmUnItIes an rIparIan veg- The responses of the rIver and ItS bIota to the etation (STANFORD& WARD 1988, STANFORDet new flow re.gi~e are now under scrutiny. In al. 1994). Over 80 invertebratetaxa (approxi- 1,999.' monItorIng, of chan?el ~orphology, mately one-third new to science)were discov- rIparIan and aq~at~c,:egetatIon, Inverte~rates ered in the shallowalluvial aquifer of this flood and fish beganwIthIn eI~t geomorph?logically plain.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Submission: Inquiry Into Climate Change and the Australian
    September 2008 NSW Submission to the Senate Standing Committee on Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Inquiry into water management in the Coorong and Lower Lakes NSW Water Legislation The management of the surface water and groundwater resources of NSW, including the allocation of water entitlements, is undertaken under the Water Act, 1912 and the Water Management Act 2000. The NSW Government is progressively transitioning water management from the Water Act 1912 to the Water Management Act 2000. The vast majority of water extraction in the NSW portion of the Murray-Darling Basin is covered by statutory water sharing plans under the Water Management Act 2000. The legislation and rules in the water sharing plans provide the framework for the implementation of the COAG-agreed water reforms, including: • the provision of water entitlements specifically for the environment; • the separation of water entitlements from land; and • clearly identified tradeable water entitlements. The priority for water sharing under the legislation is: Priority 1 Water for the environment and basic landholder rights (e.g. domestic and stock rights); Priority 2 Town water supply, domestic and stock and major utility licences (e.g. power generation, major urban water supply); Priority 3 High security licences (e.g. for permanent plantings); Priority 4 General security or unregulated river licences (e.g. for irrigation of annual crops); and Priority 5 Supplementary licences (e.g. to access high flows). However, in times of severe water shortage the priority of water for domestic purposes (i.e. either under a basic landholder right or licence) is elevated above the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Development, Options and Alternatives
    C PROJECT DEVELOPMENT, OPTIONS AND ALTERNATIVES Snowy 2.0 Main Works Project development, options and alternatives Snowy 2.0 Main Works Document Information Title Snowy 2.0 Main Works project development, options and alternatives Number Revision 1 Revision Information Revision Date Description Author Reviewer Approver 1 11/09/2019 Final Snowy Hydro Paul Smith Kieran Cusack SMEC EMM Consulting Snowy 2.0 Main Works Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Purpose of this report ............................................................................................... 2 2 Developing Snowy 2.0 ..................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Snowy 2.0 inception ................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Key design phases ................................................................................................... 3 2.3.1 Historical investigations ..................................................................................... 4 2.3.2 Feasibility design ............................................................................................... 7 2.3.3 Reference design .............................................................................................. 7 2.3.4 Contractor
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Snowy Water Licence Schedule 4 Amendments to River Murray Increased Flows (RMIF) Call out Provisions 2
    Amendment date: 28 June 2017 1. Title of measure 2011 Snowy Water Licence Schedule 4 Amendments to River Murray Increased Flows (RMIF) Call Out Provisions 2. Proponent undertaking the measure NSW and Victoria 3. Type of measure Supply 4. Requirements for notification a) Date by which the measure entered The rule changes proposed for this measure will be into or will enter into operation operational by 30 June 2024. Must be before 30 June 2024 b) Confirmation that the measure is not Yes an ‘anticipated measure’ It is a new measure (not already included in the benchmark ‘Anticipated measure’ is defined in section conditions). 7.02 of the Basin Plan to mean ‘a measure that is part of the benchmark conditions of development’. c) NSW agrees with the notification Yes d) Victoria agrees with the notification Yes 5. Surface water SDL resource units affected by the measure This measure identifies all surface water resource units in the Southern Basin region as affected units for the purposes of notifying supply measures. The identification of affected units does not constitute an agreement between jurisdictions on apportioning the supply contribution, which will be required in coming months. 6. Details of relevant constraint measures Not directly linked to constraint measures, implementing the Hume to Yarrawonga, Yarrawonga to Wakool and South Australian Murray Key Focus Area constraints proposals for the Murray River (see separate supply measure notifications) will provide outcomes that are complimentary to this supply measure. 7. Date on which the measure will enter into operation The date by which the measure will enter into operation is 30 June 2024.
    [Show full text]
  • Rehabilitation of Former Snowy Scheme Sites in Kosciuszko National Park by Elizabeth Macphee and Gabriel Wilks
    doi: 10.1111/emr.12067 FEATURE Rehabilitation of former Snowy Scheme sites in Kosciuszko National Park By Elizabeth MacPhee and Gabriel Wilks Ten years of restoration work at 200 sites within Kosciuszko National Park – sites damaged during the construction of Australias most iconic hydroelectric scheme – is showing substantial progress and is contributing to the protection of the parks internationally significant ecosystems. Key words: alpine ecosystem restoration, conservation management, industrial site remediation, soil stabilisation. Figure 1. Summer view in Kosciuszko National Park looking from about 1750 m (subalpine zone) to Geehi Dam (at 1100 m). The Snowy Mountains Hydro-Electric Scheme left high historic value, but a legacy of environmental damage at about 400 sites in the park, of which about half have been rehabilitated to date through this ambitious restoration project (The Alpine zone, includ- ing Mt Kosciuszko is in the far distance.) (Photograph G. Little). Heritage List and recognised as an Introduction International Biosphere Reserve Elizabeth MacPhee is Rehabilitation Officer osciuszko National Park (Fig. 1), (UNESCO 2010). with National Parks and Wildlife Service, Office Klocated in the south-eastern corner The Snowy Mountains Hydro-Elec- of Environment and Heritage NSW (PO Box 472, of New South Wales (NSW), contains tric Authority (SMHEA) Scheme, Aus- Tumut, NSW 2720, Australia); Email: elizabeth. alpine and subalpine flora and fauna tralia’s largest industrial project, was [email protected]; Tel: +61 2 communities (Box 1), the continents’ carried out from 1949 to 1974 in the 6947 7076). Gabriel Wilks is Environmental highest mountains, unique glacial area now gazetted as national park.
    [Show full text]
  • Snowy 2.0 Doesn't Stack Up
    This Paper, prepared by the National Parks Association of NSW, contends that the case for Snowy 2.0 does SNOWY 2.0 not stack up on either economic or DOESN’T STACK UP environmental grounds Copyright © 2019 National Parks Association of NSW Inc. 15 October 2019 All information contained within this Paper has been prepared by National Parks Association of NSW from available public sources. NPA has endeavoured to ensure that all assertions are factually correct in the absence of key information including the Business Case and financial data. Cover Photo: Thredbo River in Winter. © Gary Dunnett National Parks Association of NSW is a non-profit organisation that seeks to protect, connect and restore the integrity and diversity of natural systems in NSW. ABN 67 694 961 955 Suite 1.07, 55 Miller Street, PYRMONT NSW 2009| PO Box 528, PYRMONT NSW 2009 Phone: 02 9299 0000 | Email: [email protected] | Website: www.npansw.org.au Contents SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... 5 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................................................... 19 DETAILS ................................................................................................................................................. 20 Snowy 2.0 in a nutshell ......................................................................................................................... 21 Timeline................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Power for the People
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Creative Arts - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences & Humanities 16-8-2009 Power for the People S. A. McHugh University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/creartspapers Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation McHugh, S. A.: Power for the People 2009. https://ro.uow.edu.au/creartspapers/44 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Power for the People Siobhan McHugh As part of the Speakers Corner lecture series, award-winning author Siobhan McHugh spoke at the National Archives on 16 August 2009 about her research into the Snowy Mountains Hydro-Electric Scheme. Through the personal stories of the workers and their families, and drawing on her book, The Snowy: The People Behind the Power , Siobhan shared her insights into the lives of the multinational workforce that built the ‘Snowy’ in post-war Australia. Siobhan McHugh: It’s lovely to be here. Thank you all very much for coming. I feel a bit humbled because I know some of you have worked on the scheme. I spotted a few on the way in and you’re probably thinking, ‘What does she know about working on the Snowy? I was there.’ But I suppose my job has been the privileged one of gathering the stories and trying to collate them into some unified tapestry that could make sense of what was such an epoch-making scheme for Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Most Significant Engineering Development Something Old and Something New(Er): Two Dams Honoured
    On 22 April 2005, Hume and Dartmouth dams Something old were recognised as National Engineering Landmarks at a ceremony arranged by the and something Murray-Darling Basin Commission (MDBC) at Hume. The Commission also provided an new(er): Two inspection of Dartmouth by bus. The National Deputy President Peter Cockbain spoke about the dams honoured Plaquing Program and the heritage significance of the dams, before presenting the plaques to the President of the MDBC, the Rt Hon. Ian Sinclair AC. In 1915 the River Murray Waters Agreement was signed between the Commonwealth and New South Wales, Victoria, and South Australia, with the National Deputy President, Peter Cockbain and legislation also establishing the River Murray the President of the MDBC, the Rt Hon Ian Commission (now the Murray-Darling Basin Sinclair AC Commission) as the implementing authority. Hume Dam is the largest of the Murray River works with the first sod being turned on 28th November 1919. The intended reservoir capacity was 2 million acre-feet (2467 gigalitres - GL), but financial problems of the Great Depression caused its temporary reduction to 1.25 million acre-feet (1542 GL). The reduced-scale works were opened by Governor-General Lord Gowrie on 21st November 1936. Continued on page 4 Cooma’s Lambie Gorge is a site of cultural significance to the Ngarigo Aboriginal community. ‘ … the most The local Reconciliation Group received an Environmental Trust grant in 2004 to develop a walking trail in the Gorge so its significance could be shared with the wider community. significant The Gorge is also of historical and technological significance in the European settlement of engineering Cooma and in the development of the Snowy Mountains Scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Modular Pumped Hydro Energy Storage (MPHES)
    Modular Pumped Hydro Energy Storage (MPHES): Relevance, concept design, economics and future prospect. By Dane Fernandez Masters of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Dissertation School of Engineering and Science, Murdoch University Supervisor: Dr Manickam Minakshi Sundaram May 2019 Declaration I declare that all work undertaken in this research topic, and presented in this dissertation is my own work, and that where data, research and conclusions from others have been used to support my findings, that these have been fairly referenced and acknowledged. Abstract This project gives an overview and literature review of Pumped Hydro Energy Storage (PHES) technology detailing the present context and future prospects with particular focus on Australia’s National Electricity Market (NEM). Discussion that addresses present challenges and requirements to move forward with sustainable hydro power development electricity supply is explored. An overview of the fundamental system components and a technical design base for a Modular PHES (MPHES) is presented. A cost base is given for the MPHES and subsequently compared with other technologies. A concept design is proposed for a deployable, scalable MPHES system and is applied to two Case Studies. Discussion is given with respect to the relevance of such a scheme in Australia and the potential scalability and costs. The MPHES was found the be technically feasible and economically comparable to recent solar developments. Table of Contents Modular Pumped Hydro Energy Storage (MPHES): Relevance, concept
    [Show full text]
  • Water Storages in NSW
    PO Box R1437 NSWIC Royal Exchange NSW 1225 NEW SOUTH WALES Tel: 02 9251 8466 Fax: 02 9251 8477 IRRIGATORS’ [email protected] COUNCIL www.nswic.org.au ABN: 49 087 281 746 Submission to the Standing Committee on State Development Adequacy of Water Storages in NSW 120831 Mark Moore Policy Analyst Member Organisations: Bega Cheese Limited, Border Rivers Food & Fibre, Coleambally Irrigation Co-Op Ltd, Cotton Australia, Gwydir Valley Irrigators’ Association Inc., High Security Irrigators Inc, Hunter Valley Water Users’ Association, Lachlan Valley Water, Macquarie River Food & Fibre, Mid Coast Dairy Advancement Group, Mungindi-Menindee Advisory Council, Murray Irrigation Limited, Murray Valley Water Diverters’ Association, Murrumbidgee Groundwater Inc., Murrumbidgee Irrigation Ltd, Murrumbidgee Private Irrigators’ Inc., Murrumbidgee Valley Food and Fibre Association, Namoi Water, NSW Farmers’ Association, Ricegrowers’ Association of Australia, Richmond Wilson Combined Water Users Association, Riverina Citrus, Southern Riverina Irrigators, South Western Water Users’, West Corurgan Private Irrigation District, Western Murray Irrigation, Wine Grapes Marketing Board. Introduction NSW Irrigators’ Council (NSWIC) represents more than 12,000 irrigation farmers across NSW. These irrigators access regulated, unregulated and groundwater systems. Our members include valley water user associations, food and fibre groups, irrigation corporations and commodity groups from the rice, cotton, dairy and horticultural industries. This document represents the views of the members of NSWIC. However each member reserves the right to independent policy on issues that directly relate to their areas of operation, or expertise, or any other issues that they may deem relevant. 1 | P a g e Background NSWIC, being the peak body for irrigators in NSW, appreciates the opportunity to make a submission to this Inquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrology and Scaling Relationships of Snowy Mountain Rivers
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection 1954-2016 University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2016 Hydrology and scaling relationships of Snowy Mountain Rivers Sander van Tol University of Wollongong Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses University of Wollongong Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorise you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this work may be reproduced by any process, nor may any other exclusive right be exercised, without the permission of the author. Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the University of Wollongong. Recommended Citation van Tol, Sander, Hydrology and scaling relationships of Snowy Mountain Rivers, Master of Philosophy thesis, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Wollongong, 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Snowy Hydro Acquires Lumo Energy! RED50403-C in This Edition
    November 2014 RED IS GREEN & GOLD Snowy Hydro acquires Lumo Energy! RED50403-C In this edition: Red Energy gives New South Wales, the power to choose an electricity That means the community and economy benefit from keeping Aussie jobs retailer that is 100% Australian. here, and our customers benefit by having locally based, award-winning Snowy Hydro acquires Lumo Energy service and great value electricity. Not only are we 100% owned by the mighty Snowy Hydro, we’re based Farewell winter, hello summer: the forecast right here in Australia. You have the power to switch to an electricity retailer that is 100% Aussie. Snowy Ride 2014 raises over of $250,000 Spiritual connection to 2014 flushing flows Call 131 806 Recap of successful 65th Reunion Weekend redenergy.com.au ISSUE 27 Lumo Energy acquisition helps Snowy reach major milestone... CEO, Paul Broad, fills us in on exciting developments for Snowy Hydro of late as well as outlining some key events in the Snowy Mountains... In September, Snowy Hydro achieved a major in Victoria, South Australia, NSW and Queensland. milestone in our proud and successful history, Lumo consistently demonstrates outstanding results becoming the fourth pillar in the National Electricity in customer satisfaction and like Red Energy, they Market with the goal of securing our long term have won multiple customer service awards. We are future. excited to have Lumo join the team. In a deal worth $605 million, Snowy Hydro has This acquisition marked a very significant moment acquired Infratil’s Australian Energy Market Assets. for Snowy Hydro. We are starting a new chapter This purchase includes energy retailer Lumo Energy, in our iconic history and there are exciting times utility connection service company Direct Connect ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Snowy Mountains Scheme
    Episode 29 Teacher Resource 25th October 2016 Snowy Mountains Scheme 1. What was the main point of the BtN Snowy Mountains Students will investigate the Snowy Mountains Scheme in more detail. They Scheme story? will explore the impact migrant groups 2. Which list has the Snowy Mountains Scheme been added to? working on the scheme had on Australian 3. In which year did construction of the Snowy Mountains society. Scheme begin? 4. Briefly explain the scheme. 5. What were some concerns people had about the scheme? 6. How long did it take to complete? 7. Many of the people working on the scheme were __________________. History – Year 5 8. Why did the workers come from Europe? The reasons people migrated to Australia and the experiences and contributions of 9. What were the working and living conditions like? a particular migrant group within a 10. What impact did the scheme have on Australia? colony (ACHASSK109) History – Year 6 The contribution of individuals and groups to the development of Australian society since Federation (ACHASSK137) Stories of groups of people who migrated Class Discussion to Australia since Federation (including from ONE country of the Asia region) and Discuss the BtN Snowy Mountains Scheme story as a class. What reasons they migrated (ACHASSK136) questions were raised in the discussion (what are the gaps in their knowledge)? The following KWLH organiser provides students with a Geography – Year 7 framework to explore their knowledge on this topic and consider what The way that flows of water connect they would like
    [Show full text]