Background and Rationale

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Background and Rationale Regulation of ABCG2 Expression in the Lactating Mammary Gland by Alex Man Lai Wu A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology University of Toronto © Copyright by Alex Man Lai Wu (2014) ABSTRACT Regulation of ABCG2 Expression in the Lactating Mammary Gland Alex Man Lai Wu, Doctor of Philosophy (2014) Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology University of Toronto The Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (ABCG2) is a multidrug efflux transporter that is upregulated in certain drug-resistant cancer cells and in the mammary gland during lactation. It is unclear how ABCG2 is regulated in the lactating mammary gland. This thesis sought to understand the role of prolactin (PRL) and its downstream signalling cascades, and epigenetic mechanisms, in the regulation of ABCG2 expression in the mammary gland during lactation. Using T-47D human breast cancer cells, I showed that PRL upregulated ABCG2, in part, by inducing the recruitment of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription-5 (STAT5) to an interferon-γ activation sequence (GAS) motif in the human ABCG2 gene. Pharmacological inhibition of phosphoinositide 3-kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling further demonstrated the involvement of these pathways in the induction of ABCG2 by prolactin. To further investigate whether STAT5 regulates ABCG2 in vivo, I performed a series of experiments using mammary glands from non-lactating (virgin and forced involution) and lactating mice. These experiments revealed that the E1b alternative mouse Abcg2 mRNA isoform was predominantly expressed and induced in the mouse mammary gland during lactation. Using published STAT5 ChIP-seq datasets and ChIP-qPCR, I showed that STAT5 was bound to multiple regions along the mouse Abcg2 gene during lactation. In particular, one of these STAT5 binding regions, which contains a GAS motif, showed functional activity in luciferase reporter assays. I further investigated epigenetic mechanisms that may regulate Abcg2 in the mouse mammary gland. Despite the presence of a CpG island at the E1b ii promoter, which when hypermethylated in vitro dramatically reduced promoter activity, the E1b promoter was already hypomethylated in the virgin mammary gland and continued to be hypomethylated during lactation. Analysis of published ChIP-seq data revealed that the E1b promoter region in virgin mouse mammary epithelial cells was already enriched with the open chromatin histone mark H3K4me2 but that there was further accumulation of H3K4me2 during lactation. Collectively, these results suggest that ABCG2 is already poised for expression in the virgin mammary gland and that lactation-associated activation of STAT5, perhaps by prolactin, induces its expression. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I must thank a long list of people who have made it possible for me to endure both the challenges and triumphs of graduate studies: I must first thank my mentor and supervisor Dr. Shinya Ito for providing me with the opportunitity to work with him. Dr. Ito was always open to new ideas, new experiments, some of which may have failed whereas others succeeded, but it was this openness that has afforded me the opportunity to develop my scientific curiosity – to ‘think outside the box’. I must also thank members of my PhD supervisory committee (Drs. Patricia A Harper, David S. Riddick, and Jason Matthews) for having the foresight at the first year and most criticial time of my PhD training that my thesis was a viable PhD project. I must thank each of them individually: Dr. Harper for going beyond the role of the committee member, often acting as a teacher, mentor, and above all, a listener of all the difficulties of graduate school and life-in-general; Dr. Riddick for being the one to introduce me to Professors at international conferences and for acting as ‘thesis reader’; and Dr. Matthews for generously allowing me to work in his lab for part of my PhD work. I would also like to thank past and present members of the Ito Lab: most notably Hendrick Tan, Mingdong Yang, Pooja Dalvi, Liana Dedina, Reo Tanoshima, Tohru Kobayashi, Andrew Chuang, Marie-Caroline Delebecque, Hisaki Fujii, and John Leon-Cheon. Some of them have contributed scientifically to this thesis but all of them have made it fun to work in the Ito Lab. Other people who I must sincerely acknowledge for contributing to this thesis are: Dr. Andrei Turinsky (Centre for Computational Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children) for running the ChIP-Seq data pipeline/analysis; Kelvin Wang and Dr. Sean Egan (Developmental and Stem Cell Biology Program, Hospital for Sick Children) for helping with the virgin mammary epithelial cell isolation; Youliang Lou and Drs. Rosanna Weksberg, Darci Butcher, Sanaa Choufani (Genetics and Genome Biology Program, Hospital for Sick Children) for pyrosequencing services and discussing about epigenetics and data interpretation; Dr. Charles V Clevenger (Department of Pathology, Northwestern University) for acting as a resource to learn about PRL signalling and treatment protocols. iv Most importantly, I must thank my parents Henry and Lilian, siblings Cecilia and Brian, for being great listeners and providing often well-needed encouragement thoughout my studies. I must thank all my friends who have stayed by me, even when I’m too tired or not in the right mood to socialize. Lastly, I must thank the taxpayers and others who still believe in the importance of training new PhD scientists. It is a constant reminder that graduate school is a privilege. v Table of Contents ABSTRACT ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv List of Figures x List of Tables xi List of Appendices xiii List of Abbreviations xiv 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Statement of Research Problem 1 1.2 ABCG2 expression and function 2 1.2.1 Discovery (BCRP/MXR/ABCP/ABCG2) 2 1.2.2 Expression, localization, and function 3 1.2.2.1 Placenta 4 1.2.2.2 Gastrointestinal tract 5 1.2.2.3 Liver 6 1.2.2.4 Kidney 7 1.2.2.5 Brain 8 1.2.2.6 Testis 9 1.2.2.7 Mammary Gland 10 1.2.2.8 Stem Cells 11 1.2.2.9 Cancer 13 1.2.2.10 ABCG2 Substrates and Inhibitors 14 1.3 Promoter Organization of the Human and Mouse ABCG2 gene 18 1.3.1 Human ABCG2 gene promoter 18 1.3.2 Mouse Abcg2 gene promoter 19 1.4 Regulatory control of ABCG2 expression 20 1.4.1 Hormones and inflammatory cytokines 20 1.4.1.1 Estrogen 20 1.4.1.2 Progesterone 21 1.4.1.3 Testosterone 21 1.4.1.4 Glucocorticoids 22 1.4.1.5 Proinflammatory Cytokines 23 vi 1.4.1.6 Other Growth factors 24 1.4.2 Stress and xenobiotics 27 1.4.2.1 Hypoxia 27 1.4.2.2 Aryl hydrocarbon receptor 27 1.4.2.3 Peroxisome-proliferator activated receptor 28 1.4.2.4 Pregnane X Receptor 28 1.4.2.5 Constitutive Androstane Receptor 29 1.4.2.6 Nuclear factor-erythroid 2 p45-related factor 2 29 1.4.2.7 Retinoic acid receptor/retinoid X receptor 29 1.4.2.8 Cyclooxygenase 2 30 1.4.2.9 Extracellular milieu: folate status 30 1.4.3 miRNA and Epigenetics 31 1.4.3.1 Micro-RNA (miRNA) 31 1.4.3.2 Promoter Methylation 32 1.4.3.3 Histone Modification 33 1.4.4 Cell signalling 34 1.4.4.1 PI3K/AKT signalling 34 1.4.4.2 MAPK signalling 36 1.4.5 Species 37 1.5 Mammary Gland Biology 39 1.5.1 General Anatomy 39 1.5.2 Development 39 1.5.2.1 Embryonic 39 1.5.2.2 Prepubertal 40 1.5.2.3 Puberty 40 1.5.2.4 Pregnancy 40 1.5.2.5 Lactation 41 1.5.2.6 Involution 42 1.6 Prolactin and Prolactin Receptors 44 1.6.1 The ligand 44 1.6.2 Prolactin receptor 44 1.6.3 Prolactin receptor signalling 45 vii 1.6.3.1 JAK2/STAT5 pathway 46 1.6.3.2 Mitogen Activated Kinase Pathway 47 1.6.3.3 PI3K/AKT pathway 48 1.6.3.4 Other pathways 48 1.7 Epigenetics 50 1.7.1 CpG Islands 50 1.7.2 Histone Modifications 51 1.8 Research Rationale 52 2. METHODS 54 2.1 Reagents 54 2.2 Animals 54 2.3 Cell Culture and serum starvation 55 2.4 Treatment with hormones or TCDD 56 2.5 Small molecule inhibitors of STAT5, MAPK and PI3K signalling 56 2.6 Isolation of mouse mammary epithelial cells (MEC) 56 2.7 RNA isolation from cells and tissues 58 2.8 cDNA synthesis - reverse transcription 58 2.9 Real-time RT-PCR to assess gene expression 59 2.10 Crude membrane fraction and whole cell lysate from human-derived cells 59 2.11 Preparation of mouse mammary gland tissue lysate 60 2.12 Immunodetection of protein by gel electrophoresis/western blot 60 2.13 Immunohistochemistry 61 2.14 Short-interfering RNA 62 2.15 Plasmid constructs 63 2.15.1 Activity of the human ABCG2 gene promoter and GAS element 63 2.15.2 Activity of the mouse E1b promoter and GAS elements 64 2.16 In vitro methylation of plasmid DNA 65 2.17 Transient transfection and luciferase assay 65 2.17.1 Human ABCG2 gene promoter and GAS element activity 65 2.17.2 Mouse Abcg2 gene promoter and GAS element(s) activity 66 2.18 Genomic DNA isolation, bisulfite treatment, and pyrosequencing 67 2.19 Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) 67 viii 2.19.1 T-47D cells 67 2.19.2 Mouse mammary gland tissue 68 2.20 ChIP-seq data analysis 69 2.21 Statistical Analysis 70 3.
Recommended publications
  • Advances and Limitations of Antibody Drug Conjugates for Cancer
    biomedicines Review Advances and Limitations of Antibody Drug Conjugates for Cancer Candice Maria Mckertish and Veysel Kayser * Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-2-9351-3391 Abstract: The popularity of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) has increased in recent years, mainly due to their unrivalled efficacy and specificity over chemotherapy agents. The success of the ADC is partly based on the stability and successful cleavage of selective linkers for the delivery of the payload. The current research focuses on overcoming intrinsic shortcomings that impact the successful devel- opment of ADCs. This review summarizes marketed and recently approved ADCs, compares the features of various linker designs and payloads commonly used for ADC conjugation, and outlines cancer specific ADCs that are currently in late-stage clinical trials for the treatment of cancer. In addition, it addresses the issues surrounding drug resistance and strategies to overcome resistance, the impact of a narrow therapeutic index on treatment outcomes, the impact of drug–antibody ratio (DAR) and hydrophobicity on ADC clearance and protein aggregation. Keywords: antibody drug conjugates; drug resistance; linkers; payloads; therapeutic index; target specific; ADC clearance; protein aggregation Citation: Mckertish, C.M.; Kayser, V. Advances and Limitations of Antibody Drug Conjugates for 1. Introduction Cancer. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 872. Conventional cancer therapy often entails a low therapeutic window and non-specificity https://doi.org/10.3390/ of chemotherapeutic agents that consequently affects normal cells with high mitotic rates biomedicines9080872 and provokes an array of adverse effects, and in some cases leads to drug resistance [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Genomics Approaches to Elucidate Vulnerabilities of Intrinsic and Acquired Chemotherapy Resistance
    cells Review Functional Genomics Approaches to Elucidate Vulnerabilities of Intrinsic and Acquired Chemotherapy Resistance Ronay Cetin 1,† , Eva Quandt 2,† and Manuel Kaulich 1,3,4,* 1 Institute of Biochemistry II, Goethe University Frankfurt-Medical Faculty, University Hospital, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, 08195 Barcelona, Spain; [email protected] 3 Frankfurt Cancer Institute, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany 4 Cardio-Pulmonary Institute, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-(0)-69-6301-5450 † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Drug resistance is a commonly unavoidable consequence of cancer treatment that results in therapy failure and disease relapse. Intrinsic (pre-existing) or acquired resistance mechanisms can be drug-specific or be applicable to multiple drugs, resulting in multidrug resistance. The presence of drug resistance is, however, tightly coupled to changes in cellular homeostasis, which can lead to resistance-coupled vulnerabilities. Unbiased gene perturbations through RNAi and CRISPR technologies are invaluable tools to establish genotype-to-phenotype relationships at the genome scale. Moreover, their application to cancer cell lines can uncover new vulnerabilities that are associated with resistance mechanisms. Here, we discuss targeted and unbiased RNAi and CRISPR efforts in the discovery of drug resistance mechanisms by focusing on first-in-line chemotherapy and their enforced vulnerabilities, and we present a view forward on which measures should be taken to accelerate their clinical translation. Citation: Cetin, R.; Quandt, E.; Kaulich, M. Functional Genomics Keywords: chemotherapy resistance; cancer and drug vulnerabilities; functional genomics; RNAi Approaches to Elucidate Vulnerabilities of Intrinsic and and CRISPR screens Acquired Chemotherapy Resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Ep 2569287 B1
    (19) TZZ _T (11) EP 2 569 287 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: C07D 413/04 (2006.01) C07D 239/46 (2006.01) 09.07.2014 Bulletin 2014/28 (86) International application number: (21) Application number: 11731562.2 PCT/US2011/036245 (22) Date of filing: 12.05.2011 (87) International publication number: WO 2011/143425 (17.11.2011 Gazette 2011/46) (54) COMPOUNDS USEFUL AS INHIBITORS OF ATR KINASE VERBINDUNGEN ALS HEMMER DER ATR-KINASE COMPOSÉS UTILISABLES EN TANT QU’INHIBITEURS DE LA KINASE ATR (84) Designated Contracting States: • VIRANI, Aniza, Nizarali AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB Abingdon GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO Oxfordshire OX144RY (GB) PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR • REAPER, Philip, Michael Abingdon (30) Priority: 12.05.2010 US 333869 P Oxfordshire OX144RY (GB) (43) Date of publication of application: (74) Representative: Coles, Andrea Birgit et al 20.03.2013 Bulletin 2013/12 Kilburn & Strode LLP 20 Red Lion Street (73) Proprietor: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. London WC1R 4PJ (GB) Boston, MA 02210 (US) (56) References cited: (72) Inventors: WO-A1-2010/054398 WO-A1-2010/071837 • CHARRIER, Jean-Damien Abingdon • C. A. HALL-JACKSON: "ATR is a caffeine- Oxfordshire OX144RY (GB) sensitive, DNA-activated protein kinase with a • DURRANT, Steven, John substrate specificity distinct from DNA-PK", Abingdon ONCOGENE, vol. 18, 1999, pages 6707-6713, Oxfordshire OX144RY (GB) XP002665425, cited in the application • KNEGTEL, Ronald, Marcellus Alphonsus Abingdon Oxfordshire OX144RY (GB) Note: Within nine months of the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent in the European Patent Bulletin, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to that patent, in accordance with the Implementing Regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Cell Cycle Regulation on Chemotherapy
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review The Influence of Cell Cycle Regulation on Chemotherapy Ying Sun 1, Yang Liu 1, Xiaoli Ma 2 and Hao Hu 1,* 1 Institute of Biomedical Materials and Engineering, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China; [email protected] (Y.S.); [email protected] (Y.L.) 2 Qingdao Institute of Measurement Technology, Qingdao 266000, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Cell cycle regulation is orchestrated by a complex network of interactions between proteins, enzymes, cytokines, and cell cycle signaling pathways, and is vital for cell proliferation, growth, and repair. The occurrence, development, and metastasis of tumors are closely related to the cell cycle. Cell cycle regulation can be synergistic with chemotherapy in two aspects: inhibition or promotion. The sensitivity of tumor cells to chemotherapeutic drugs can be improved with the cooperation of cell cycle regulation strategies. This review presented the mechanism of the commonly used chemotherapeutic drugs and the effect of the cell cycle on tumorigenesis and development, and the interaction between chemotherapy and cell cycle regulation in cancer treatment was briefly introduced. The current collaborative strategies of chemotherapy and cell cycle regulation are discussed in detail. Finally, we outline the challenges and perspectives about the improvement of combination strategies for cancer therapy. Keywords: chemotherapy; cell cycle regulation; drug delivery systems; combination chemotherapy; cancer therapy Citation: Sun, Y.; Liu, Y.; Ma, X.; Hu, H. The Influence of Cell Cycle Regulation on Chemotherapy. Int. J. 1. Introduction Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6923. https:// Chemotherapy is currently one of the main methods of tumor treatment [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy and Toxicity of Belotecan for Relapsed Or Refractory Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Original Article Efficacy and Toxicity of Belotecan for Relapsed or Refractory Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Gun Min Kim, MD,*† Young Sam Kim, MD, PhD,† Young Ae Kang, MD, PhD,† Jae-Heon Jeong, MD,‡ Sun Mi Kim, PhD,§ Yun Kyoung Hong, MS,|| Ji Hee Sung, MS,|| Seung Taek Lim, MD,† Joo Hang Kim, MD, PhD,*† Se Kyu Kim, MD, PhD,† and Byoung Chul Cho, MD, PhD,*† mall cell lung cancer (SCLC) comprises approximately Introduction: Belotecan (Camtobell, CKD602) is a new camp- 15% of all lung cancers and is strongly associated with tothecin-derivative antitumor agent that belongs to the topoi- S smoking.1 SCLC is highly responsive to initial chemotherapy somerase inhibitors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the or radiotherapy. However, approximately 80% of the limited- efficacy and safety of belotecan monotherapy as a second-line stage and nearly all extensive-stage patients develop recur- therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory small cell lung can- rence. The patients who relapse after initial chemotherapy cer (SCLC). have a poor prognosis. The median survival is 2 to 3 months Methods: Between June 2008 and August 2011, a total of 50 patients for the patients who do not receive salvage therapy.2 The with relapsed or refractory SCLC were treated with belotecan 0.5mg/ 2 results of second-line chemotherapy are also disappointing, m for 5 consecutive days, every 3 weeks. We evaluated the overall with low response rates and short survival times.3 response rate (ORR), the progression-free survival (PFS), and the The efficacy of salvage chemotherapy depends on the overall survival (OS), and toxicity according to sensitivity to initial response and the duration of the response to initial chemo- chemotherapy.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Management of Small-Cell Lung Cancer (Limited- and Extensive-Stage) and the Role of Thoracic Radiotherapy and First-Line Chemotherapy: a Systematic Review
    FIRST-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY AND RADIOTHERAPY FOR SCLC, Sun et al. REVIEW ARTICLE Initial management of small-cell lung cancer (limited- and extensive-stage) and the role of thoracic radiotherapy and first-line chemotherapy: a systematic review † ‡§ || ‡ A. Sun MD,* L.D. Durocher-Allen MSc, P.M. Ellis MBBS PhD, Y.C. Ung MD, J.R. Goffin MD, K. Ramchandar MD,# and G. Darling MD** ABSTRACT Background Patients with limited-stage (ls) or extensive-stage (es) small-cell lung cancer (sclc) are commonly given platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment. Standard chemotherapy for patients with ls sclc includes a platinum agent such as cisplatin combined with the non-platinum agent etoposide. The objective of the present systematic review was to investigate the efficacy of adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy in patients with es sclc and to determine the appropriate timing, dose, and schedule of chemotherapy or radiation for patients with sclc. Methods The medline and embase databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (rcts) comparing treatment with radiotherapy plus chemotherapy against treatment with chemotherapy alone in patients with es sclc. Identifiedrct s were also included if they compared various timings, doses, and schedules of treatment for patients with es sclc or ls sclc. Results Sixty-four rcts were included. In patients with ls sclc, overall survival was greatest with platinum– etoposide compared with other chemotherapy regimens. In patients with es sclc, overall survival was greatest with chemotherapy containing platinum–irinotecan than with chemotherapy containing platinum–etoposide (hazard ratio: 0.84; 95% confidence interval: 0.74 to 0.95; p = 0.006).
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article
    REVIEW ARTICLE Chemotherapy advances in small-cell lung cancer Bryan A. Chan1,2, Jermaine I. G. Coward1,2,3 1Mater Adult Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Raymond Terrace, Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia; 2School of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; 3Inflammation & Cancer Therapeutics Group, Mater Research, Level 4, Translational Research Institute, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia ABSTRACT Although chemotherapeutic advances have recently been heralded in lung adenocarcinomas, such success with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has been ominously absent. Indeed, the dismal outlook of this disease is exemplified by the failure of any significant advances in first line therapy since the introduction of the current standard platinum-etoposide doublet over 30 years ago. Moreover, such sluggish progress is compounded by the dearth of FDA-approved agents for patients with relapsed disease. However, over the past decade, novel formulations of drug classes commonly used in SCLC (e.g. topoisomerase inhibitors, anthracyclines, alkylating and platinum agents) are emerging as potential alternatives that could effectively add to the armamentarium of agents currently at our disposal. This review is introduced with an overview on the historical development of chemotherapeutic regimens used in this disease and followed by the recent encouraging advances witnessed in clinical trials with drugs such as amrubicin and belotecan which are forging new horizons for future treatment algorithms. KEY WORDS Small cell lung cancer (SCLC); amrubicin; belotecan; picoplatin; relapsed SCLC J Thorac Dis 2013;5(S5):S565-S578. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.07.43 Introduction cigarette smoking 20 years prior, but is now slowly decreasing due to changing smoking patterns (2).
    [Show full text]
  • Exploiting DNA Replication Stress for Cancer Treatment Tajinder Ubhi1,2 and Grant W
    Published OnlineFirst April 9, 2019; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3631 Cancer Review Research Exploiting DNA Replication Stress for Cancer Treatment Tajinder Ubhi1,2 and Grant W. Brown1,2 Abstract Complete and accurate DNA replication is fundamental to associated with such therapies. We discuss how replication cellular proliferation and genome stability. Obstacles that stress modulates the cell-intrinsic innate immune response delay, prevent, or terminate DNA replication cause the phe- and highlight the integration of replication stress with immu- nomena termed DNA replication stress. Cancer cells exhibit notherapies. Together, exploiting replication stress for cancer chronic replication stress due to the loss of proteins that treatment seems to be a promising strategy as it provides a protect or repair stressed replication forks and due to the selective means of eliminating tumors, and with continuous continuous proliferative signaling, providing an exploitable advances in our knowledge of the replication stress response therapeutic vulnerability in tumors. Here, we outline current and lessons learned from current therapies in use, we are and pending therapeutic approaches leveraging tumor-specific moving toward honing the potential of targeting replication replication stress as a target, in addition to the challenges stress in the clinic. Introduction mental. In this review, we provide a summary of the therapies centered on enhancing both endogenous and drug-induced rep- The DNA replication machinery successfully carries out accu- lication stress and discuss the rationales associated with them. We rate genome duplication in the face of numerous obstacles, many also highlight the potential of using replication stress to stimulate of which cause DNA replication stress.
    [Show full text]
  • Ep 3067054 A1
    (19) TZZ¥ZZ_T (11) EP 3 067 054 A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION (43) Date of publication: (51) Int Cl.: 14.09.2016 Bulletin 2016/37 A61K 31/505 (2006.01) A61K 31/55 (2006.01) A61K 38/17 (2006.01) A61P 35/00 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 16156278.0 (22) Date of filing: 10.09.2008 (84) Designated Contracting States: • MIKULE, Keith AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR Cambridge, MA Massachusetts 02139 (US) HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT • LI, Youzhi RO SE SI SK TR Westwood, MA 02090 (US) (30) Priority: 10.09.2007 US 971144 P (74) Representative: Finnie, Isobel Lara 13.12.2007 US 13372 Haseltine Lake LLP Lincoln House, 5th Floor (62) Document number(s) of the earlier application(s) in 300 High Holborn accordance with Art. 76 EPC: London WC1V 7JH (GB) 08830633.7 / 2 200 431 Remarks: (71) Applicant: Boston Biomedical, Inc. This application was filed on 18-02-2016 as a Cambridge, MA 02139 (US) divisional application to the application mentioned under INID code 62. (72) Inventors: • LI, Chiang, Jia Cambridge, MA Massachusetts 02141 (US) (54) NOVEL COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR CANCER TREATMENT (57) The present invention relates to the composition and methods of use of Stat3 pathway inhibitors or cancer stem cell inhibitors in combination treatment of cancer. EP 3 067 054 A1 Printed by Jouve, 75001 PARIS (FR) EP 3 067 054 A1 Description REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 5 [0001] This application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Antigen Binding Protein and Its Use As Addressing Product for the Treatment of Cancer
    (19) TZZ 58Z9A_T (11) EP 2 589 609 A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION (43) Date of publication: (51) Int Cl.: 08.05.2013 Bulletin 2013/19 C07K 16/28 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 11306416.6 (22) Date of filing: 03.11.2011 (84) Designated Contracting States: (72) Inventors: AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB •Beau-Larvor, Charlotte GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO 74520 Jonzier Epagny (FR) PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR • Goetsch, Liliane Designated Extension States: 74130 Ayze (FR) BA ME (74) Representative: Regimbeau (83) Declaration under Rule 32(1) EPC (expert 20, rue de Chazelles solution) 75847 Paris Cedex 17 (FR) (71) Applicant: PIERRE FABRE MEDICAMENT 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt (FR) (54) Antigen binding protein and its use as addressing product for the treatment of cancer (57) The present invention relates to an antigen bind- of Axl, being internalized into the cell. The invention also ing protein, in particular a monoclonal antibody, capable comprises the use of said antigen binding protein as an of binding specifically to the protein Axl as well as the addressing product in conjugation with other anti- cancer amino and nucleic acid sequences coding for said pro- compounds,such as toxins, radio- elements ordrugs, and tein. From one aspect, the invention relates to an antigen the use of same for the treatment of certain cancers. binding protein, or antigen binding fragments, capable of binding specifically to Axl and, by inducing internalization EP 2 589 609 A1 Printed by Jouve, 75001 PARIS (FR) EP 2 589 609 A1 Description [0001] The present invention relates to a novel antigen binding protein, in particular a monoclonal antibody, capable of binding specifically to the protein Axl as well as the amino and nucleic acid sequences coding for said protein.
    [Show full text]
  • Antibody–Drug Conjugates for Cancer Therapy
    molecules Review Antibody–Drug Conjugates for Cancer Therapy Umbreen Hafeez 1,2,3, Sagun Parakh 1,2,3 , Hui K. Gan 1,2,3,4 and Andrew M. Scott 1,3,4,5,* 1 Tumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3084, Australia; [email protected] (U.H.); [email protected] (S.P.); [email protected] (H.K.G.) 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC 3084, Australia 3 School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3084, Australia 4 Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3084, Australia 5 Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC 3084, Australia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-39496-5000 Academic Editor: João Paulo C. Tomé Received: 14 August 2020; Accepted: 13 October 2020; Published: 16 October 2020 Abstract: Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel drugs that exploit the specificity of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) to reach target antigens expressed on cancer cells for the delivery of a potent cytotoxic payload. ADCs provide a unique opportunity to deliver drugs to tumor cells while minimizing toxicity to normal tissue, achieving wider therapeutic windows and enhanced pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties. To date, nine ADCs have been approved by the FDA and more than 80 ADCs are under clinical development worldwide. In this paper, we provide an overview of the biology and chemistry of each component of ADC design. We briefly discuss the clinical experience with approved ADCs and the various pathways involved in ADC resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Belotecan and Cisplatin Combination Chemotherapy for Previously Untreated Extensive-Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
    J Lung Cancer 2010;9(1):15-19 Belotecan and Cisplatin Combination Chemotherapy for Previously Untreated Extensive-Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer Ⓡ Purpose: Belotecan (Camtobell ; Chong Keun Dang Co., Seoul, Korea) is a Jeong Eun Lee, M.D.1, 2 new camptothecin analog that inhibits topoisomerase I. We evaluated the efficacy Kye Young Lee, M.D. , 1 and toxicity of belotecan combined with cisplatin in patients with previously Hee Sun Park, M.D. , Sung Soo Jung, M.D.1, untreated extensive-disease small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) and who were Ju Ock Kim, M.D.1 and without evidence of brain metastases. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients Sun Young Kim, M.D.1 with previously untreated ED-SCLC were treated with belotecan (0.5 mg/m2/day) on days 1∼4 and with cisplatin (60 mg/m2/day) on day 1 of a 3-week cycle. Department of Internal Medicine, 1Chungnam National University Hos- Results: Of the 19 assessable patients, 16 had an objective tumor response, pital & Cancer Research Institute, including two complete responses, for an overall response rate of 84.2%. Toxicity Chungnam National University College was evaluated in all 20 patients who received a total of 106 cycles (median of Medicine, Daejon, 2Konkuk Univer- cycles/patient, 5.5; range, 1∼9). The major grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were sity School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea neutropenia (67.9% of cycles), anemia (19.8% of cycles) and thrombocytopenia Received: March 15, 2010 (33.9% of cycles). No grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities were observed. No Revised: April 19, 2010 treatment-related deaths occurred.
    [Show full text]