Chalgrove Airfield Feedback
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Chalgrove Airfield Feedback Q1 Homes (up to 3,000 homes, 20% of identified need in South Oxfordshire) Answered: 84 Skipped: 52 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Housing Affordab Housing Housing Housing Apartmen Opportun Opportun for le for for the for key ts & ities ities families housing young elderly workers housing for for (40%) people for rent self-... local... Essential High Priority Important Low Priority Unnecessary ESSENTIAL HIGH IMPORTANT LOW UNNECESSARY TOTAL WEIGHTED PRIORITY PRIORITY AVERAGE Housing for families 27.50% 16.25% 21.25% 5.00% 30.00% 22 13 17 4 24 80 2.94 Affordable housing (40%) 39.02% 12.20% 13.41% 3.66% 31.71% 32 10 11 3 26 82 2.77 Housing for young people 18.29% 15.85% 23.17% 12.20% 30.49% 15 13 19 10 25 82 3.21 Housing for the elderly 23.17% 13.41% 25.61% 7.32% 30.49% 19 11 21 6 25 82 3.09 Housing for key workers 30.49% 13.41% 20.73% 6.10% 29.27% 25 11 17 5 24 82 2.90 Apartments & housing for 6.33% 8.86% 17.72% 18.99% 48.10% rent 5 7 14 15 38 79 3.94 Opportunities for self-build & 20.51% 3.85% 12.82% 19.23% 43.59% custom-build housing 16 3 10 15 34 78 3.62 Opportunities for local 15.19% 15.19% 13.92% 18.99% 36.71% house-builders 12 12 11 15 29 79 3.47 1 / 1 Chalgrove Airfield Feedback Q2 Jobs (up to 1,000 within the offices, workshops, shops, schools and local services) Answered: 81 Skipped: 55 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% A range of Space for Houses that Supporting Providing local jobs small allow people the expansion land and a businesses to work from of Monument new runway house Business Park for the... Essential High Priority Important Low Priority Unnecessary ESSENTIAL HIGH IMPORTANT LOW UNNECESSARY TOTAL WEIGHTED PRIORITY PRIORITY AVERAGE A range of local jobs 36.84% 11.84% 21.05% 3.95% 26.32% 28 9 16 3 20 76 2.71 Space for small businesses 25.00% 21.05% 15.79% 11.84% 26.32% 19 16 12 9 20 76 2.93 Houses that allow people to 13.75% 7.50% 26.25% 22.50% 30.00% work from house 11 6 21 18 24 80 3.48 Supporting the expansion of 6.58% 11.84% 22.37% 28.95% 30.26% Monument Business Park 5 9 17 22 23 76 3.64 Providing land and a new 51.28% 6.41% 7.69% 7.69% 26.92% runway for the growth of 40 5 6 6 21 78 2.53 Martin-Baker 1 / 1 Chalgrove Airfield Feedback Q3 Shops and Services (we want to create a sustainable and attractive 21st Century Market Town) Answered: 79 Skipped: 57 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% A supermarket large Local shops and cafes A square for markets enough for weekly and events shopping Essential High Priority Important Low Priority Unnecessary ESSENTIAL HIGH IMPORTANT LOW UNNECESSARY TOTAL WEIGHTED PRIORITY PRIORITY AVERAGE A supermarket large enough 37.18% 5.13% 14.10% 11.54% 32.05% for weekly shopping 29 4 11 9 25 78 2.96 Local shops and cafes 30.77% 17.95% 14.10% 10.26% 26.92% 24 14 11 8 21 78 2.85 A square for markets and 28.21% 12.82% 8.97% 19.23% 30.77% events 22 10 7 15 24 78 3.12 1 / 1 Chalgrove Airfield Feedback Q5 Drainage Answered: 81 Skipped: 55 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Sustainable drainage (swales, Run-off (specific measures to ponds and wetlands to manage reduce existing surface water surface water and improve water run-off from the Airfield and quality) divert it away from Chalgrove... Essential High Priority Important Low Priority Unnecessary ESSENTIAL HIGH IMPORTANT LOW UNNECESSARY TOTAL WEIGHTED PRIORITY PRIORITY AVERAGE Sustainable drainage 70.37% 4.94% 2.47% 1.23% 20.99% (swales, ponds and wetlands 57 4 2 1 17 81 1.98 to manage surface water and improve water quality) Run-off (specific measures 70.13% 5.19% 2.60% 1.30% 20.78% to reduce existing surface 54 4 2 1 16 77 1.97 water run-off from the Airfield and divert it away from Chalgrove village) 1 / 1 Chalgrove Airfield Feedback Q6 Green Space (40ha/100acres) Answered: 81 Skipped: 55 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Playing Parks & open Allotments Ecological Woodland fields space/greens areas and walks and wetlands to green lanes improve... Essential High Priority Important Low Priority Unnecessary ESSENTIAL HIGH IMPORTANT LOW UNNECESSARY TOTAL WEIGHTED PRIORITY PRIORITY AVERAGE Playing fields 50.00% 11.25% 13.75% 2.50% 22.50% 40 9 11 2 18 80 2.36 Parks & open space/greens 56.25% 10.00% 8.75% 2.50% 22.50% 45 8 7 2 18 80 2.25 Allotments 38.75% 15.00% 11.25% 8.75% 26.25% 31 12 9 7 21 80 2.69 Ecological areas and 48.75% 11.25% 11.25% 6.25% 22.50% wetlands to improve 39 9 9 5 18 80 2.42 biodiversity Woodland walks and green 49.38% 9.88% 8.64% 7.41% 24.69% lanes 40 8 7 6 20 81 2.48 1 / 1 Chalgrove Airfield Feedback Q7 Movement Answered: 83 Skipped: 53 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Traffic-free A network of Improved bus Reducing Investment cycle routes safe, services and traffic to reduce and walkable traffic-free connections speeds on traffic neighbourh... routes to... to Oxford ... this stret... congestion... Essential High Priority Important Low Priority Unnecessary ESSENTIAL HIGH IMPORTANT LOW UNNECESSARY TOTAL WEIGHTED PRIORITY PRIORITY AVERAGE Traffic-free cycle routes and 24.36% 7.69% 11.54% 16.67% 39.74% walkable neighbourhoods 19 6 9 13 31 78 3.40 with 20mph areas to prioritise walking and cycling A network of safe, traffic-free 38.75% 16.25% 15.00% 1.25% 28.75% routes to schools 31 13 12 1 23 80 2.65 Improved bus services 55.00% 11.25% 8.75% 0.00% 25.00% and connections to Oxford 44 9 7 0 20 80 2.29 and Science Vale Reducing traffic speeds on 18.99% 7.59% 11.39% 10.13% 51.90% this stretch of the B480 15 6 9 8 41 79 3.68 Investment to reduce traffic 56.96% 6.33% 3.80% 3.80% 29.11% congestion in surrounding 45 5 3 3 23 79 2.42 communities 1 / 1 Chalgrove Airfield Feedback Q8 Other (please specify) and general comments Answered: 127 Skipped: 9 # RESPONSES DATE 1 HOMES ENGLAND “CONSULTATION” RE: CHALGROVE AIRFIELD, JULY 2018 This was in 8/13/2018 12:14 PM no way a consultation, since there was no wish to listen to concerns, discuss the basis of their plans, vis a vis the village, or answer any questions on which they had not been briefed, or had not yet done any research. I am completing it on line in an effort to control the input, since tick boxes are always designed to achieve the aims of the form commissioner. Para 1 – there has only been lip-service to ‘working with’ local stake-holders – suggestions were ignored, hazards dismissed, and plans presented as having been ‘agreed’ when they were not, even to the extent of printing a photo of people dissenting captioned as being co-operating. There are now stickers available so that all those who find themselves in the company of HE photographers can wear them back and front to prevent this occurring again. Para 2 – I tried to get responses out of your team – most of my questions apparently referred to matters which had not as yet been researched. Para 3 – could you please indicate where the on-line consultation option was been publicised, except verbally to those present. Homes - Chalgrove did a housing survey alongside the NDP questionnaire, which demonstrated that fewer than 40 homes affordable were needed locally. Currently, planning applications have been granted on 320 homes in the village of which one can only hope the statutory proportion of ‘affordable’ homes will be provided. I think even at 20% that should suffice. Key workers will not be able to afford the commuting cost into Oxford on their low wages, the elderly will not be able to access the Hospitals (the village has an overstretched volunteer force, which will be unable to service the town residents). I am unable to locate any local housebuilders, and any local competent tradesmen have 3-month waiting lists as it is. Previous promises to regarding entertainment facilities such as cinemas, pubs, bowling alleys have vanished, to be replaced with community-run film club and a field (first find your volunteers). Jobs – There would have to be a vast number of jobs created in this place, to prevent a huge commuting traffic problem. But none of this employment can need the use of articulated or similar large transport vehicles, as there is no road bigger than the B480, and the plan would seem to be to set up a lorry park in a non-specified place for transferring goods into and out of smaller vans. How very odd. There is no point in providing land and a new runway for Martin-Baker Ltd. Their explosions are loud and frequent. Ejected seats may land anywhere on the airfield, so they would not be permitted to continue their business on this site, and would have to take their essential defence and civil business abroad and that would lose Chalgrove itself 80 jobs.