Periodic Report - Second Cycle Section I-Hungary
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Periodic Report - Second Cycle Section I-Hungary 1. Introduction Aggtelek National Park Directorate Domain: natural 1.1 - State Party Puskás, Zoltán Hungary director Balaton Uplands National Park Directorate Domain: natural 1.2 - Date of ratification of the World Heritage Convention Horváth, Ákos dr. 15/07/1985 director Bükk National Park Directorate 1.3 - Entities involved in the preparation of Section I of the Domain: natural Periodic Reporting Závoczky, Szabolcs Governmental institutions responsible for cultural and natural heritage director ICOMOS national / regional Duna-Drava National Park Directorate IUCN national / regional Domain: natural Füri, András 1.4 - Primary government authorities responsible for the director implementation of the Convention Duna-Ipoly National Park Directorate Domain: natural Gabor Soos Secretariat of the Hungarian World Heritage Reischl, Gábor Commission director Fertő-Hanság National Park Directorate Department of International Cooperation; National Domain: natural Office of Cultural Heritage Szilágyi, Gábor Comment director Hortobágy National Park Directorate Mr. János Lázár, Minister Responsible for the Prime Minister’s Domain: natural Office. Prime Minister’s Office:H 1357 Budapest, Pf. 6, Tel.: +36-1-795 500, E-mail: [email protected] (details are Magyar, Gábor dr. expected later) National Focal Point Dr Gábor Soós, Head of interim director, general deputy director Division of World Heritage and International Relations Gyula Kiskunság National Park Directorate Forster National Centre for CH Management Táncsics u. 1. H Domain: natural 1014 Budapest Tel.: +36 12254873 Tirják, László [email protected] director Körös-Maros National Park Directorate 1.5 - Other key institutions responsible Domain: natural - Markovics, Tibor dr. - director - Őrség National Park Directorate Domain: - Domain: natural Cselovszki, Zoltán Szentmiklóssy, Zoltán dr. President, President of the Hungarian World Heritage interim director Commission, UNESCO Hungarian National National Inspectorate For Environment and Nature Commission Domain: natural Gyula Forster National Centre for Cultural Heritage Dolla, Eszter Management director Domain: cultural Mid-Danube Valley Inspectorate For Environment and Csonka-Takács, Eszter PhD Nature Director Domain: natural Department of Intangible Cultural Heritage of the Némethy, Tímea Hungarian Open Air Museum director Domain: national Lower Tisza Region Inspectorate For Environment and Horváth, Gergely Nature deputy CEO in charge of tourism Domain: natural Hungarian Tourism Ltd. Gulyás, Anita dr. Domain: tourism director Barkóczi, Zsolt South-Transdanubian Inspectorate For Environment manager and Nature Lechner Lajos Knowledge Centre Domain: natural Domain: cultural Németh, Zoltán director Minister of Agriculture North-Transdanubian Inspectorate For Environment and Ministry of Agriculture Nature Domain: natural Domain: natural Veress, Balázs Kopácsi, Éva director director Page 1 Friday, October 10, 2014 (5:56:04 PM CEST) Periodic Report - Section I-Hungary World Heritage Centre Periodic Report - Second Cycle Section I-Hungary North-Hungarian Inspectorate For Environment and Other (please provide details in 2.7) Not applicable Nature Domain: natural 2.3 - Are inventories/lists/registers adequate to capture Szentesi, Péter the diversity of cultural and natural heritage in the State director Party? Upper Tisza Region Inspectorate For Environment and Inventories/lists/registers capture some of the diversity of Nature cultural and natural heritage. Domain: natural Zay, Andrea dr. 2.4 - Are inventories / lists / registers used to protect the director identified cultural heritage? Mid-Transdanubian Inspectorate For Environment and Nature Inventories / lists / registers are frequently used for the Domain: natural protection of cultural heritage. Kónya, Károly director 2.5 - Are inventories / lists / registers used to protect the Mid-Tisza region Inspectorate For Environment and identified natural heritage? Nature Inventories / lists / registers are frequently used for the Domain: natural protection of natural heritage. Bencsics, Attila director 2.6 - Are inventories / lists / registers used for the West-Transdanubian Inspectorate For Environment and identification of properties for the Tentative List? Nature Inventories / lists / registers are frequently used for the Domain: natural identification of potential World Heritage Properties. Kelemen, Béla director 2.7 - Comments, conclusions and / or recommendations Trans-Tisza Inspectorate For Environment and Nature related to inventories / lists / registers of cultural and Domain: natural natural heritage (questions 2.1 to 2.6) Újlaki, Zsuzsánna Acting Head of Department 3. Tentative List Ministry of the Interior, Deputy State Secretariat for Area Management and Construction, Domain: cultural 3.1 - Potential future nominations (Property name / anticipated year of nomination) Caves of the Buda Thermal Karst System / 11/08/1993 / 1.6 - Comments Frontiers of the Roman Empire – Ripa Pannonica in Hungary / 22/06/2009 / According to our WH Law, the following members of Gov. bear shared responsibility and must cooperate for WH: Minister Le Château-fort médiéval d''Esztergom / 11/08/1993 / responsible for culture; supervising state assets; construction; Mediaeval Royal Seat and Parkland at Visegrád / 28/12/2000 / development policy; organising public administration; nature Ödön Lechner’s independent pre-modern architecture / 26/05/2008 / protection; spatial planning; settlement development and State Stud-Farm Estate of Mezöhegyes / 28/12/2000 / settlement planning; tourism; agrarian policy;protection of hist. System of Fortifications at the Confluence of the Rivers Danube and Váh in momuments and archeological heritage. Komárno - Komárom / 12/01/2007 / The Ipolytartnóc Fossils / 28/12/2000 / 2. Inventories / lists / registers for cultural and The Network of Rural Heritage Buildings in Hungary / 28/12/2000 / natural heritage The Tihany Peninsula / 11/08/1993 / The Wooden Churches of the Northern Part of the Carpathian Basin / 28/12/2000 / 2.1 - Cultural Heritage (Level and Status) National Process completed or 3.2 - Tools used for a preliminary assessment of the continually potential Outstanding Universal Value updated ICOMOS thematic studies Regional / provincial / state Not applicable IUCN thematic studies Local Process Filling the gaps – an action plan for the future by ICOMOS, Gaps analysis by commenced IUCN Other (please provide details in 2.7) Not applicable Meetings to harmonize Tentative Lists within your region UNESCO’s Global Strategy for a representative, balanced and credible World 2.2 - Natural Heritage (Level and Status) Heritage List National Process Others (please provide details in 3.7) completed or continually updated 3.3 - Level of involvement in the preparation of the Regional / provincial / state Process Tentative List completed or National government institution(s) Good continually updated Regional / provincial / state / government(s) Fair Local Process well- Local government(s) Fair advanced Other government departments Fair Page 2 Friday, October 10, 2014 (5:56:04 PM CEST) Periodic Report - Section I-Hungary World Heritage Centre Periodic Report - Second Cycle Section I-Hungary UNESCO National Commission Good Regional / provincial / state government(s) Fair Local authorities within or adjacent to the property Poor Local government(s) Not applicable Local communities / residents Poor Other government departments Fair Indigenous peoples Not applicable UNESCO National Commission No involvement Landowners Poor Local authorities within or adjacent to the property No Local industries Poor involvement Non Governmental Organization(s) Fair Local communities / residents No Consultants / experts Good involvement Site manager / coordinator(s) Fair Indigenous peoples Not applicable Landowners No involvement 3.4 - Was the authority(ies) listed in question 1.4 Local industries No responsible for the approval and submission of the involvement Tentative List? Non Governmental Organization(s) No Yes involvement Consultants / experts Good 3.5 - If not, what authority(ies) is responsible for the Site manager / coordinator Not applicable approval and submission of the Tentative List? 4.3 - Perceived benefits of inscribing properties on the World Heritage List 3.6 - Do you intend to update your Tentative List within Strengthened protection of sites (legislative, regulatory, High benefit the next six years? institutional and / or traditional) Yes Enhanced conservation practices Some benefit Catalyst for wider community appreciation of heritage High benefit 3.7 - Comments Improved presentation of sites Some benefit Revision of the Hungarian Tentative list is ongoing. The new Enhanced honour / prestige High benefit Tentative list will be declared on 1st January 2015. Upon this, Increased funding High benefit senior level decision is needed concerning possible future Additional tool for lobbying / political influence High benefit nomination. Stimulus for enhanced partnerships Some benefit Increased recognition for tourism and public use High benefit 4. Nominations Stimulus for economic development in surrounding Limited benefit communities Others (please provide details in 4.4) Not applicable 4.1 - Property Name Date of Status submission 4.4 - Comments Medicinal Baths of Szechnenyi, Budapest 1985-12-31 withdrawn Ad 4.3.1., 4.3.2.: Pursuant to Hungary’s World Heritage Act Budapest, 4 Synagogues 1986-04-24