A City Under Pressure

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A City Under Pressure September 10 2013 London & the World Part three: a city under pressure SUPPORTEDBY www.ft.com/london-world 2 FINANCIAL TIMES TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 10 2013 FINANCIAL TIMES TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 10 2013 3 London and the World | Overview London and the World | Overview CONTENTS The capital takes the strain in times of austerity London has fared better than much of the UK, but it is not immune to the impact of cutbacks – and also faces unique challenges. By James Pickford 2 OVERVIEW Despite its strengths, the capital is under Cuts to local authority budgets pressure in the wake of the financial crisis 4 POPULATION have left councillors facing Employers say attempts to cut migration could keep out the people London needs invidious choices on funding 6 HOUSING How much impact are foreign buyers having on the property market in the capital? benefit claimants decline since April 2011. But 7 AFFORDABLE HOMES Barnet’s claimant levels went up by 45 per cent, Traditional models of home ownership may and Newham and Haringey showed rises of 41 become a thing of the past, campaigners say per cent and 21 per cent. 8 EDUCATION Private rented property has become more The equivalent of 200 primary schools will be expensive over the period, and research by the needed by 2017 following a new baby boom Centre for London think-tank shows that rental 9 FREE SCHOOLS costs as a proportion of household income have Can the government’s new educational model increased from 21 per cent in 2001-02 to 27 per create places where they are most needed? cent in 2010-11. The proportion of people renting 10 OFFSHORE FINANCIAL CENTRES privately in the capital has risen to 25 per cent, The City’s relationship with overseas tax up from 18 per cent two years ago. havens is under ever-closer scrutiny The government says that London’s local 11 OPINION authorities received an extra £50m to help those Green party leader Natalie Bennett calls for affected by the housing benefit cap. But the a fundamental rethink on how London works councils would like to see the capital treated as a special case, with a higher cap to offset its greater housing costs. CONTRIBUTORS While councils have largely directed their NATALIE BENNETT is the leader of the criticism of public spending cuts at central Green party government rather than City Hall, Mr Johnson HANNAH KUCHLER is an FT journalist has not escaped the effects of tighter funding. FEARGUS O’SULLIVAN is a freelance Local authorities have attacked the mayor over journalist his plan to cut £28.8m from the fire service JAMES PICKFORD is the FT’s London and budget over two years, with the closure of 10 fire southeast correspondent stations and the loss of 14 fire engines and 552 HELEN WARRELL is the FT’s public policy firefighting jobs in the capital. correspondent (education and home affairs) Eight Labour-led councils have written to Eric Pickles, communities secretary, to try to overturn it, and said they would seek a judicial ILLUSTRATIONS review if the decision went ahead. It has even NICK LOWNDES prompted objections from Tory-run councils, such as Westminster and Kensington & Chelsea, where fire stations are to close. Special reports editor Michael Skapinker Londoners are not behind Mr Johnson: a Editor Hugo Greenhalgh YouGov poll in July showed 61 per cent against Lead editor Jerry Andrews the cuts, and 69 per cent believed they would Production editor George Kyriakos threaten public safety. Sub editors Richard Gibson, David Scholefield On infrastructure and spending – City Hall’s Picture editor Michael Crabtree biggest budgetary responsibility – the mayor has Art director Derek Westwood fared better. In its comprehensive spending Head of project delivery Rachel Harris review in June, the government cut Transport Head of strategic sales Patrick Collins for London’s grant by 12.5 per cent, to £1.6bn in Head of B2B & World Reports Robert Grange 2015-16. But fears of threats to Tube upgrades, road safety improvements and an ambitious cycle scheme proved false after ministers All editorial in this special report is produced by pledged to hold capital investment at the FT. Our advertisers have no influence over, or £1bn a year in 2015-21. prior sight of, the articles or online material. Tony Travers, a local government expert at the London School of Economics, OR ALL ITS RELIANCE ON greatest between boroughs and the government. Ravi Govindia, London Councils’ executive says: “Transport has not financial services, London’s Cuts to local authority budgets have left member for adult services, says: “While we The pioneer with the lamp been subject to anything economy has shown remarkable councillors facing invidious choices on funding, support the [Care] Bill, we are concerned that like the pressures imposed strength in the years following including that for activities they are statutorily councils will have to pick up the tab if it goes THE LIVES BEHIND THE BLUE PLAQUES on local government.” the banking crisis. It has put obliged to provide, such as rubbish collection and ahead as planned without first taking into COMMEMORATING SOME OF LONDON’S EMINENT These questions will be more distance between itself and adult social care. account London’s circumstances – particularly RESIDENTS. FIRST: FLORENCE NIGHTINGALE brought to the fore in two the other regions of the UK in London Councils, the umbrella organisation the high cost of residential care.” big tests of public opinion terms of output, and extended its for the city’s 33 local authorities, says a funding It is unclear whether Florence for London politics over the lead against the national average in household gap of £907m will open by 2018 because of the HE APPLICATION OF UK-WIDE Nightingale would have next two years: borough Fincome, employment rates and productivity. With rising cost of adult care. One-third of councils’ policies to London’s distinctive flourished in a National Health elections in 2014 and the general a broad-based economy and highly skilled labour funds are spent on adult social care, and this is economy creates other difficulties. Service tightening its belt. After election in 2015. Video force, the capital has cemented its status as the expected to grow as the population ages during The government is introducing being used by the government Mr Travers says the Labour party Gerard Lyons, chief engine of the UK economy. the next decade. The organisation has also changes to the benefits system, as a heroic figurehead for British efforts was likely to make “small gains” in the This has not left it unaffected by cuts in warned that the capital’s local authorities would Tcapping the total amount that a household can in the Crimean war, she raised the then borough elections, but questioned the view that economic adviser to the government spending designed to reduce a face further costs of £877m by 2019-20 to receive at £500 a week. Londoners pay about lavish sum of £45,000 to found a nurses’ London was a city that habitually votes Labour mayor, debates affordable daunting budget deficit. But the impact has accommodate government reforms to the care £1,400 a month for a two-bed property, against a training school at St Thomas’ Hospital, with in national polls. The party has seen big revealed itself in ways that reinforce the system. Under the plans, any care costs above a national average of £665, so more capital dwellers facilities that now seem spartan but were increases in its London vote share since 1997. housing with Toby Lloyd, contrasts between the capital’s economy and lifetime limit of £72,000 are expected to be will be caught by the cap. excellent for the time. She went on to But the “London Labour lead” is relatively new that of the regions. This has led to calls for carried by councils. Concerns have surfaced that the policy is revolutionise British nursing, despite being in historic terms, and by no means guaranteed. Shelter’s head of policy London to be treated differently by national But the costs of residential care are highest in pushing low-income groups out of central London confined to bed in her house in South Street, “The big challenge for Labour in 2015 is to hold www.ft.com/ policy makers – not least from its Conservative the capital. This means the proportion of people to the outer boroughs, which in turn puts Mayfair, almost crippled by an undiagnosed on to those people,” he says. mayor, Boris Johnson. paying for residential care in London could reach pressure on their provision of essential services. case of the bacterial disease brucellosis. Tensions over spending – and arguments over london-world If deficit reduction has exacerbated the 27 per cent, compared with 3 per cent in areas of Islington, Camden, Kensington & Chelsea and Feargus O’Sullivan the capital as a “special case” – are unlikely to PHOTOS: GETTY; BLOOMBERG; ANNA GORDON tensions in London politics, friction has been the UK where it is far cheaper, the report said. Westminster have seen the number of housing recede soon from London’s political debate. 4 FINANCIAL TIMES TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 10 2013 FINANCIAL TIMES TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 10 2013 5 London and the World | Migration An open or shut case Is the push to restrict immigration keeping out the very people the capital needs? By Helen Warrell ORE THAN ONE IN three Londoners were born outside the UK, and last year it emerged that white ethnic Britons are, for the first time, a minority in the capital. A decade-long surge in the numbers of Indian migrants, among Mothers, has contributed to London’s diversity.
Recommended publications
  • Governing England: Devolution and Funding 1 Governing England: Devolution and Funding About Governing England
    Governing England: Devolution and funding 1 Governing England: Devolution and funding About Governing England Contents Foreword 2 Akash Paun About Governing England 3 1. Funding England: a review of the issues 4 Iain McLean 2. How England is funded 11 Martin Rogers and Alun Evans 3. Equalisation, incentives and discretion in English local public service provision 35 David Phillips 4. An exploration of the issues raised by the move towards to 100% Business Rate Retention 53 Aileen Murphie 5. Funding combined authorities and city regions 63 Tony Travers About the authors 72 Acknowledgements 73 2 Governing England: Devolution and funding Foreword By Akash Paun Foreword The British Academy’s Governing England programme was established in 2016 to explore questions about England’s governance, institutions and identity. One central focus of this work has been the English devolution agenda, looking at how successive governments have tried (occasionally successfully) to devolve power to England’s cities, towns and regions. During the course of the programme, the Academy has hosted a series of events across England, which have informed the production of two previous reports. The first, Governing England: Devolution and mayors in England (2017), examined the ‘devolution deals’ negotiated between central government and local authorities since 2015, leading to the election of ‘metro mayors’ in seven English city-regions. The second, Governing England: Devolution and public services (2018), investigated the impact (actual and potential) of devolution in three important areas of public policy: health and social care, skills, and infrastructure. A common theme emerging from this past work is that devolution cannot achieve its full potential as a mechanism for transforming the governance of England so long as the system for funding public services and local government remains unreformed and highly centralised.
    [Show full text]
  • Devolution in England: the Case for Local Government
    House of Commons Communities and Local Government Committee Devolution in England: the case for local government First Report of Session 2014–15 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 30 June 2014 HC 503 Incorporating HC 1018, Session 2013–14 Published on 9 July 2014 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Communities and Local Government Committee The Communities and Local Government Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Communities and Local Government. Current membership Mr Clive Betts MP (Labour, Sheffield South-East) (Chair) Bob Blackman MP (Conservative, Harrow East) Simon Danczuk MP Rochdale (Labour, Rochdale) Mrs Mary Glindon MP (Labour, North Tyneside) David Heyes MP (Labour, Ashton under Lyne) Mark Pawsey MP (Conservative, Rugby) John Pugh MP (Liberal Democrat, Southport) Alec Shelbrooke MP (Conservative, Elmet and Rothwell) [member of the Committee from 23 June 2014] John Stevenson MP (Conservative, Carlisle) Heather Wheeler MP (Conservative, South Derbyshire) Chris Williamson MP (Labour, Derby North) The following member was also a member of the committee during the inquiry: James Morris MP (Conservative, Halesowen and Rowley Regis) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/clg and by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Psa Awards Winners 2000, 2003 - 2016
    PSA AWARDS WINNERS 2000, 2003 - 2016 AWARDS TO POLITICIANS Politician of the Year Sadiq Khan (2016) George Osborne (2015) Theresa May (2014) John Bercow (2012) Alex Salmond (2011) David Cameron and Nick Clegg (2010) Barack Obama (2009) Boris Johnson (2008) Alex Salmond (2007) David Cameron (2006) Tony Blair (2005) Gordon Brown (2004) Ken Livingstone (2003) Lifetime Achievement in Politics Gordon Brown (2016) Harriet Harman (2015) David Blunkett (2014) Jack Straw (2013) Sir Richard Leese (2012) Bill Morris (2012) Chris Patten (2012) David Steel (2011) Michael Heseltine (2011) Neil Kinnock (2010) Geoffrey Howe (2010) Rhodri Morgan (2009) Ian Paisley (2009) Paddy Ashdown (2007) Prof John Hume (2006) Lord David Trimble (2006) Sir Tam Dalyell (2005) Kenneth Clarke QC (2004) Baroness Williams of Crosby (2003) Dr Garrett Fitzgerald (2003) Roy Jenkins (2000) Denis Healey (2000) Edward Heath (2000) Special Award for Lifetime Achievement in Politics Aung San Suu Kyi (2007) 1 Opposition Politician of the Year Theresa May (2003) Parliamentarian of the Year Baroness Smith of Basildon (2016) Sarah Wollaston (2015) Nicola Sturgeon (2014) Natascha Engel (2013) Margaret Hodge (2012) Ed Balls (2011) Patrick Cormack (2010) Dennis Skinner (2010) Tony Wright (2009) Vince Cable (2008) John Denham (2007) Richard Bacon MP (2006) Sir Menzies Campbell (2005) Gwyneth Dunwoody (2005) Baroness Scotland of Asthal QC (2004) Robin Cook (2003) Tony Benn (2000) Political Turkey of the Year Veritas (2005) The Law Lords (2004) Folyrood - the Scottish Parliament building
    [Show full text]
  • Education and the Private Finance Initiative
    FORUM Volume 52, Number 2, 2010 www.wwwords.co.uk/FORUM Education and the Private Finance Initiative CLIVE GRIGGS ABSTRACT This article reviews the development of Private Finance Initiative schemes in the United Kingdom, and reflects on how profitable opportunitees for private financiers and construction companies were created at the expense of the public sector. Introduction The first Private Finance Initiative (PFI) scheme in Britain was introduced by John Major’s Conservative Government. It was the toll bridge linking the mainland to the Isle of Skye completed in 1995. It would illustrate characteristics which would be common to many such schemes. The initial funding by the private sector meant it did not show up on the public sector borrowing requirement and the financial details were kept secret under the plea of ‘commercial confidentiality’. The service would prove expensive both in the level of fees through tolls charged and the sum paid by taxpayers when the contract was bought out. Major was an enthusiastic supporter of PFI because it fitted in with his belief in widespread privatisation. Some Labour MPs had criticised the move for that very reason so when their Party swept to power in 1997 it was thought that the system would be ended. The reason given for its continuation initially was because the neglect of the infrastructure in much of the public sector, especially schools, was so parlous, as numerous reports from HMIs had made clear, that it was thought private as well as public finance would be needed to meet the high demand. Soon it was to become a preferred method for financing many large-scale capital projects for the public sector by Gordon Brown when Chancellor and later Prime Minister.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2017 Audit of UK Democracy
    The 2017 Audit of UK Democracy October 2017 Editors: Professor Patrick Dunleavy Ros Taylor Core-funded by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust With the assistance of the London School of Economics and Political Science i Contributors Andrew Blick King’s College London Sonali Campion London School of Economics and Political Science Colin Copus De Montfort University Patrick Dunleavy London School of Economics and Political Science Michael Gordon University of Liverpool Joelle Grogan Middlesex University Jac Larner Cardiff University Ewan McGaughey King’s College London James Downe Cardiff University Malcolm Harvey University of Aberdeen Toby S James University of East Anglia Sean Kippin University of the West of Scotland James Mitchell Edinburgh University James Pattison University of Nottingham Artemis Photiadou London School of Economics and Political Science James Pow Queen’s University Belfast Diana Stirbu London Metropolitan University Ros Taylor London School of Economics and Political Science Tony Travers London School of Economics and Political Science Tracey Warren University of Nottingham Alan Whysall University College London This report is Copyright 2017 by Democratic Audit. www.democraticaudit.com ii Contents 1. How democratically do the main electoral systems operate? ............................. 1 1.1 The ‘Westminster plurality rule’ electoral system ............................................... 2 1.2 The reformed electoral systems used in mayoral and devolved elections ......... 13 1.3 The UK’s two proportional electoral systems .................................................... 24 1.4 Are UK elections conducted with integrity, with sufficient turnout? ................ 32 2. How democratic are political input processes? .................................................. 45 2.1 The UK’s political parties and party system ...................................................... 46 2.2 The interest group process across the UK .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WHEN SMALLER IS BETTER JASON KRUPP with FOREWORD by MICHAEL BARNETT © the New Zealand Initiative 2016
    THE LOCAL BENCHMARK WHEN SMALLER IS BETTER JASON KRUPP with FOREWORD BY MICHAEL BARNETT © The New Zealand Initiative 2016 Published by: The New Zealand Initiative PO Box 10147 Wellington 6143 New Zealand www.nzinitiative.org.nz Views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of The New Zealand Initiative, its staff, advisors, members, directors or officers. ISBN: 978-0-9941365-0-3 • print 978-0-9941365-1-0 • online/pdf RR27 Typeset by The Little Design Company and cover design by Mollica Sokhom Printed by Wickliffe Solutions Cover images (clockwise from top left): Manchester, Zurich, Amsterdam, and Montreal. THE LOCAL BENCHMARK WHEN SMALLER IS BETTER JASON KRUPP with FOREWORD BY MICHAEL BARNETT 2016 The New Zealand Initiative is an independent public policy think tank supported by chief executives of major New Zealand businesses. We believe in evidence-based policy and are committed to developing policies that work for all New Zealanders. Our mission is to help build a better, stronger New Zealand. We are taking the initiative to promote a prosperous, free and fair society with a competitive, open and dynamic economy. We develop and contribute bold ideas that will have a profound, positive, long-term impact. TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD 3 INTRODUCTION 5 CHAPTER ONE: MANCHESTER 7 LINGERING MALAISE 8 GROWING PAINS 9 EVIDENCE BASE 11 WILLING PARTNER 12 WILL DEVOLUTION WORK? 13 DISTILLED WISDOM 14 WHAT IS BEING DEVOLVED TO GREATER MANCHESTER? 15 CHAPTER TWO: SWITZERLAND 17 THE BODY OF LOCALISM 18 THE SPIRIT OF LOCALISM 20 CONTEST IN CONTEXT 20 CONCLUSION 24 CHAPTER THREE: THE NETHERLANDS 25 ANATOMY OF THE LOWER COUNTRIES 26 ADAPTABILITY 27 PARTNERSHIPS 29 COMPLEX WORLD 30 CHAPTER FOUR: MONTREAL 33 PANCAKES, MAPLE SYRUP AND MERGERS 33 ONE ISLAND, ONE CITY 35 EFFICIENCY CHIMERA 36 FUSION, DE-FUSION, CONFUSION 37 BREAK-UP BLUES 39 LESSONS LEARNED 40 CONCLUSION 41 BIBLIOGRAPHY 42 ABOUT THE AUTHOR JASON KRUPP Jason is a Research Fellow at The New Zealand Initiative.
    [Show full text]
  • Psa Awards Recipients 2000, 2003 - 2018
    PSA AWARDS RECIPIENTS 2000, 2003 - 2018 AWARDS TO POLITICIANS POLITICIAN OF THE YEAR David Lammy (2018) Jeremy Corbyn (2017) Sadiq Khan (2016) George Osborne (2015) Theresa May (2014) John Bercow (2012) Alex Salmond (2011) David Cameron and Nick Clegg (2010) Barack Obama (2009) Boris Johnson (2008) Alex Salmond (2007) David Cameron (2006) Tony Blair (2005) Gordon Brown (2004) Ken Livingstone (2003) LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT IN POLITICS Baroness Jowell (2018) Gordon Brown (2016) Harriet Harman (2015) David Blunkett (2014) Jack Straw (2013) Sir Richard Leese (2012) Bill Morris (2012) Chris Patten (2012) David Steel (2011) Michael Heseltine (2011) Neil Kinnock (2010) Geoffrey Howe (2010) Rhodri Morgan (2009) Ian Paisley (2009) Paddy Ashdown (2007) Prof John Hume (2006) Lord David Trimble (2006) Sir Tam Dalyell (2005) Kenneth Clarke QC (2004) Baroness Williams of Crosby (2003) Dr Garrett Fitzgerald (2003) Roy Jenkins (2000) 1 Denis Healey (2000) Edward Heath (2000) SPECIAL AWARD FOR LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT IN POLITICS Aung San Suu Kyi (2007) OPPOSITION POLITICIAN OF THE YEAR Theresa May (2003) PARLIAMENTARIAN OF THE YEAR Dominic Grieve (2018) Ruth Davidson (2017) Baroness Smith of Basildon (2016) Sarah Wollaston (2015) Nicola Sturgeon (2014) Natascha Engel (2013) Margaret Hodge (2012) Ed Balls (2011) Patrick Cormack (2010) Dennis Skinner (2010) Tony Wright (2009) Vince Cable (2008) John Denham (2007) Richard Bacon MP (2006) Sir Menzies Campbell (2005) Gwyneth Dunwoody (2005) Baroness Scotland of Asthal QC (2004) Robin Cook (2003) Tony Benn (2000)
    [Show full text]
  • Liberal Lion: Jo Grimond: a Political Life
    LIBERAL LION JO GRIMOND: A POLITICAL LIFE PETER BARBERIS Published in 2004 by I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd 6 Salem Road, London W2 4BU 175 Fi�h Avenue, New York NY 10010 www.ibtauris.com In the United States of America and in Canada distributed by Palgrave Macmillan, a division of St Martin’s Press 175 Fi�h Avenue, New York NY 10010 Copyright © Peter Barberis, 2004 The right of Peter Barberis to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or any part thereof, may not be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmi�ed, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior wri�en permission of the publisher. ���� 1 85043 627 4 ��� 978 1 85043 627 0 A full CIP record for this book is available from the British Library A full CIP record for this book is available from the Library of Congress Library of Congress catalog card: available Typeset in Palatino Linotype by Steve Tribe, Andover Printed and bound in Great Britain by MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin Contents Preface and Acknowledgements iv Part I – L�������� 1. First Light 3 2. Into Parliament 17 3. Man for the Islands 33 4. Whip Hand 49 Part II – L�������� 5. Leader 67 6. Internationalist 81 7. Orpington Man 97 8. High Noon 111 9. A’Whoring 127 Part III – T������� 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Political Change Thatcherism and the Remaking of the Labour Party 1979-1997
    EXPLORING POLITICAL CHANGE THATCHERISM AND THE REMAKING OF THE LABOUR PARTY 1979-1997 RICHARD HEFFERNAN P hD THESIS LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF LONDON UMI Number: U61BB65 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U613365 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ~L Z £ ^Saujouoog Abstract. The politics of Thatcherism reflects a political and economic project rooted in the ideology of the New Right. While subject to the interplay of opportunity and circumstance, chance and fortune, the Thatcher and Major governments of 1979-1997 did pursue and largely enact a coherent political agenda. Thatcherism is best understood as a process enacted over time. At its very heart was an anti-statist commitment to roll back the frontiers not of the state per se but of the pre­ existing ‘social democratic’ state. As a project simultaneously informed by an ideological doctrine and constrained by the dictates of statecraft, Thatcherism was an agent of political change, one which reconfigurated state and society at the same time it was responsive to political realities and electoral pressures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of London
    THE FUTURE OF LONDON Edited by Ryan Shorthouse and Liam Booth-Smith Kindly supported by: The moral right of the authors has been asserted. All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher of this book. Bright Blue is an independent think tank and pressure group for liberal conservatism. Bright Blue takes complete responsibility for the views expressed in this publication, and these do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsor. Director: Ryan Shorthouse Chair: Matthew d’Ancona Members of the board: Diane Banks, Philip Clarke, Alexandra Jezeph, Rachel Johnson Localis is an independent think-tank, dedicated to issues related to devolution, local economic growth and public service reform. Chief Executive: Liam Booth-Smith Chair: Sir Merrick Cockell Members of the board: Sir Edward Lister, Cllr Paul Carter CBE, Cllr Paul Bettison, Cllr David Burbage MBE First published in Great Britain in 2016 by Bright Blue Campaign and Localis ISBN: 978-1-911128-34-2 www.brightblue.org.uk www.localis.org.uk Copyright © Bright Blue Campaign and Localis, 2016 Contents Acknowledgements 5 Foreword 6 Mark Boleat Introduction 8 Ryan Shorthouse and Liam Booth-Smith Growing London 1 Upwards, downwards and outwards 16 The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP
    [Show full text]
  • CRESC Working Paper Series Working Paper No.136
    CRESC Working Paper Series Working Paper No.136 Sukhdev Johal, John Law, Karel Williams May 2014 From Publics to Congregations? GDP and its Others1 Sukhdev Johal1, John Law2, and Karel Williams3 1 School of Business and Management, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS 2 ESRC Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change (CRESC), Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA 3 ESRC Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change (CRESC), Manchester Business School, Booth Street West, Manchester, M15 6PB, UK This Working Paper is available for download at: http://www.cresc.ac.uk/publications/from-publics-to-congregations-gdp-and-its-others Abstract In this working paper we explore the issue of economic framings and publics by talking about GDP, the narratives that go with this, and the location of its publics. We consider the necessarily arbitrary framing of statistics and narratives. Next we reflect on the public work done by GDP, and in particular the realities it renders difficult or impossible. Then we turn to possible alternatives, ask how dominant framings might be undone to generate substitute narratives which attend to economic inequalities, and discuss how different framings, issues and publics might be created around two-nation narratives. Finally we turn to praxis, and explore how these alternative framings might be used to move from publics to activist congregations in disadvantaged locations, and so to influence policy in those locations. 1 Free download is available from http://www.cresc.ac.uk/publications/from-publics-to-congregations-gdp-and- its-others Framing the Argument There is good news for the British economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Raising the Capital the Report of the London Finance Commission
    Raising the capital The report of the London Finance Commission MAY 2013 RAISING THE CAPITAL | THE REPORT OF THE LONDON FINANCE COMMISSION Raising the capital The report of the London Finance Commission MAY 2013 1 RAISING THE CAPITAL | THE REPORT OF THE LONDON FINANCE COMMISSION C opyright P ublished by London Finance Commission City Hall, The Queen’s Walk London SE1 2AA May 2013 www.london.gov.uk 020 7983 4564 ISBN 978 1 84781 479 1 Design: www.jwcreativedesign.co.uk © London Finance Commission, 2013 2 RAISING THE CAPITAL | THE REPORT OF THE LONDON FINANCE COMMISSION C ontents CHAIR’S FOREWORD 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 RECOMMENDATIONS 10 PART 1: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 13 1. Introduction and background to the Commission 14 2. UK devolution in context 17 3. Summary of previous reviews 21 4. Principles adopted in making recommendations 25 PART 2: EVIDENCE 27 1. Summary of evidence received 28 2. Academic and international evidence 34 PART 3: SUPPORTING LONDON AND UK GROWTH 37 1. London and UK cities 38 2. Funding and incentivising growth 47 PART 4: FISCAL POWERS 56 1. Introduction to fiscal devolution 57 2. Emerging concepts of devolution to cities 59 3. Property taxes 62 4. Radical tax reforms? 70 5. Fees and charges 73 PART 5: RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN AND OUTSIDE LONDON 75 1. Distributional and equalisation mechanisms 76 2. Implications for wider London government reform 78 3. London within England 80 4. Conclusion 81 ANNEXES 82 1. Biographies 83 2. Terms of Reference 86 3. London’s tax and spending 89 3 RAISING THE CAPITAL | THE REPORT OF THE LONDON FINANCE COMMISSION C hair’s foreword T he London Finance Commission provides an opportunity to improve the government of London.
    [Show full text]