United Arab Emirates

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

United Arab Emirates UNITED ARAB EMIRATES COUNTRY READER TABLE OF CONTENTS Brooks Wrampelmeier 1968-1974 Arabian Peninsula Affairs, Washington, DC William A. Stoltzfus 1972-1976 Ambassador to UAE, Kuwait François M. Dickman 1972-1976 Arabian Peninsula Country Director, Washington, DC Michael E. Sterner 1974-1976 Ambassador, United Arab Emirates François M. Dickman 1976-1979 Ambassador, United Arab Emirates Brooks Wrampelmeier 1977-1980 Deputy Chief of Mission, Abu Dhabi William D. Wolle 1979-1981 Ambassador, United Arab Emirates Brooks Wrampelmeier 1982-1984 Deputy Director/Office Director, Arabian Peninsula Affairs, Washington, DC George Quincey Lumsden 1982-1986 Ambassador, United Arab Emirates David M. Ransom 1983-1985 Deputy Chief of Mission, Abu Dhabi Marjorie Ransom 1983-1985 Public Affairs Officer, USIS, Abu Dhabi Andrea Farsakh 1983-1985 Political Officer, Abu Dhabi Michael J. Varga 1985-1987 Consular Officer, Dubai David L. Mack 1986-1989 Ambassador, United Arab Emirates William A. Rugh 1992-1995 Ambassador, United Arab Emirates George Quincey Lumsden 1994-1997 General Manager; Gulf South Asia Gas Project, United Arab Emirates BROOKS WRAMPELMEIER Arabian Peninsula Affairs Washington, DC (1968-1974) 1 Brooks Wrampelmeier was born in Ohio in 1934. He received his bachelor’s degree from Princeton University in 1956. His career has included positions in Beirut, Amman, Jeddah, Lusaka, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait, and Dhahran. Mr. Wrampelmeier was interviewed by Charles Stuart Kennedy in March 2000. Q: I would have thought there would have been a certain conflict from your perspective of Saudi Arabia and Iran, which was our major ally, on the Persian Gulf because the Iranians had claims or eyes, at least, on some of the Gulf states and off shore islands. WRAMPELMEIER: There was a problem. Some of it was worked out in a median line agreement at the end of the ‘60s between Saudi Arabia and Iran to settle conflicting claims to various islands and oil fields in the Gulf. The relationship between Iran and Saudi Arabia was at least officially friendly but not warm. The Saudis, being Wahhabis, don’t like Shia very much at all and there were some problems because of that but not serious state-to-state problems. I think the general thought was that the Shah is important and he is going to protect the Gulf to some extent from the Soviets and also counterbalance the Iraqis. We were concerned about what he might be trying to do on the Arab side of the Gulf. Certainly we were concerned about the Shah’s action in November 1971 in seizing for Iran the islands of the Tunbs and Abu Musa that were claimed by Ras Al-Khaimah and Sharjah, respectively. But, again, there were problems between Saudi Arabia, Oman, and Abu Dhabi, too, over borders. Q: Had the Buraimi crisis been solved? WRAMPELMEIER: Yes, long before. It hadn’t really been solved, but it was in abeyance. That is, the Saudis' effort to seize and hold parts of the Buraimi, or Al-Ain, oasis had been frustrated in the mid-‘50s when British-officered Omani Scouts came in and kicked a small force of Saudi policemen out of the oasis. But the border between Saudi Arabia and Abu Dhabi had not been resolved and when the smaller Gulf states became independent in 1971 there was a period of several years during which the Saudis did not recognize the United Arab Emirates (UAE) because they were holding their recognition hostage to get Abu Dhabi to agree to a border agreement on Saudi terms. A border agreement was reached in 1974, but it was never published. Q: Did we get involved in that? WRAMPELMEIER: We didn’t get involved in the border issue per se. I think we were concerned that the Saudis recognize the UAE and help stabilize the situation, but we didn’t get involved in the nitty gritty of the issue. Our focus in the early ‘70s was on the emergence of the nine Gulf states and Oman as independent actors and on the question of our diplomatic presence there. We started off with accrediting our ambassador in Kuwait, William Stoltzfus, also to Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE, and Oman. Up to that time, Consulate General Dhahran had been responsible for our consular affairs in these emirates. About 1972 we also established small diplomatic posts under chargés in Bahrain, Doha, Abu Dhabi and Muscat. That worked for maybe a year or so until it became obvious that each of these countries wanted to have a resident U.S. ambassador. By 1974 we 2 were appointing resident ambassadors to all the Gulf states. Mike Sterner was our first ambassador in Abu Dhabi. The late Joe Twinam, who had been desk officer for the Gulf states in ARP, went out to Bahrain as ambassador. Bob Paganelli was sent as ambassador to Qatar and Bill Wolle to Muscat. WILLIAM A. STOLTZFUS Ambassador to United Arab Emirates Kuwait (1972-1976) William A. Stoltzfus was born in Lebanon in 1924. He attended Princeton University and then entered the Naval Air Corps. He entered the Foreign Service in 1949 and his career included positions in Libya, Kuwait, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Ethiopia, Saudi Arabia, and an ambassadorship to Kuwait. Ambassador Stoltzfus was interviewed by Lillian P Mullin in May 1994. Q: And how long were you posted to Jeddah? STOLTZFUS: We were in Jeddah from July, 1968 to the tail end of 1971. And then we went back to the States on leave. I think we were there over the Christmas holidays of 1971. And in early 1972 we went out to Kuwait. That was when the British had left the Gulf area. They had Sir Jeffrey Arthur who was the British Resident in Bahrain. The British had a set up where they had the "Resident" in Bahrain who was the overall representative of Britain in the Gulf. And then they had Political Agents in each one of the countries along the pirate coast of Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Sharjah and so forth. There were seven principalities. I will get to those later. And Qatar and Kuwait. So the American Consul's counterpart in Kuwait when I was first there in the 1950's was the Political Agent. But by the time I got there as Ambassador in 1972, there was a British Ambassador in Kuwait. I think Kuwait independence came in 1961. So they had been independent for some time before I arrived as Ambassador. In the Gulf the British had tried to make a federation of those various principalities, nine of them. Qatar, which stands by itself as a kind of thumb pointing up on the western side of the Gulf, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) which consists of seven states, and Bahrain, an island. But it was not surprising that the Rulers were jealous of each other. The Qatari and Bahraini Rulers were not about to bow to Sheikh Zaid, the Ruler of Abu Dhabi. Because Abu Dhabi is the biggest and most important state in the UAE, if they had joined the UAE they no doubt would have had to play second fiddle. The Ruler of Dubai, who was of the Maktum family, also thought he should not be subservient, but Dubai is too small to be independent. Also, the Dubai Ruler does as he pleases anyway. It turned out that the UAE with the seven states formed one group.So I was Ambassador to Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE and Oman. Q: When did you learn that you were nominated to be Ambassador? 3 STOLTZFUS: I mentioned this letter or missive or whatever it was that came from Washington to the Ambassador after the Agnew visit to Jeddah. Thacher then told me that I was being recommended to be Ambassador to Kuwait. So when I was back on leave I was on consultation. I was nominated somewhere toward the end of 1971. It must have been November or December, 1971. It was either in December or very early the next year that I went before the Senate Foreign Relations committee. Everything worked out okay. And then I left. Q: You didn't have a long wait? STOLTZFUS: No, no. It went quickly. They wanted somebody there pretty quickly. Q: Do you recall any of the things that the Senate committee asked you or what they seemed to be looking for? Did they know what they were asking during your interview? STOLTZFUS: It was pretty proforma. There were some questions about the oil companies. Who were the oil companies and where they were and so forth. There was not a lot of cross examining there. I did have one irritating experience though. The State Department gives you various suggestions for whom you should call on in Washington before you leave for your post. One was calling on my Senator from New Jersey, who was Senator Case. I'd always voted for Case. When I got to his office he just stood up behind his desk with his arms akimbo, rocking on one foot and then the other, making it grossly clear that I was not to sit down. I could see that his secretary was quite embarrassed by this. She clearly was uncomfortable. Anyway, he said, "Glad to hear you are going out. And we have an important base in Bahrain." He acted or pretended that he knew something about it. I wasn't there for more than two or three minutes at most, so that was not very good. But anyway, he voted for me so I guess I could say I was happy about that. The questions by Senate committee members were basically designed to find out if I knew anything about the area.
Recommended publications
  • The Artists Professional
    CREATIVE PALESTINIAN ART COMPETITION | PUBLICATION | EXHIBITION THE ART SAWA AWARDS “This initiative is a very important one. Palestinian artists in the diaspora have participated in the growth of the Middle East art scene, but that Under the patronage of H.E Sheikh Nahyan Bin Mubarak Al Nahya, Minister of Higher Education and Scientific Research, and in partnership with the opportunity has so far been denied those living in the West Bank and Gaza. By bringing together such a number of artists and by engaging them in the Welfare Association, Art Sawa presents a juried, non-for-profit competition. The exhibition showcases contemporary art from Palestine, where 45 regional scene this competition has provided them a platform. established artists and 11 emerging artists participate, in hope to win – where there will be three winners in total. The selection is diverse. You will find among the works pathos, anger, humour, hope and, most importantly, potential. I was delighted by the range and The members of the jury consist of; Zaki Nusseibeh, Advisor at the Presidential Court and interpreter for the President of the United Arab Emirates; creativity of these artists in what, for most of them, is their first international exhibition.” William Laurie, Head of Sale at Christie’s Dubai and charge of the department of Modern and Contemporary Arab & Iranian Art worldwide; Ali Khadra, founder and publisher of Canvas Omar Donia, co-founder and publisher of Contemporary Practices Journal; Massimiliano Lodi, Manager for TDIC Cultural MR WILLIAM LAURIE Department. During this past year, there has been a multitude of events for contemporary arts from Palestine and the Diaspora, proving to be one of the Head of Sale at Christie’s Dubai and Head of Modern and Contemporary Arab & Iranian Art worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • World Stars Sharjah Online International Chess Championship 2020
    World Stars Sharjah Online International Chess Championship 2020 World Stars 2020 ● Tournament Book ® Efstratios Grivas 2020 1 Welcome Letter Sharjah Cultural & Chess Club President Sheikh Saud bin Abdulaziz Al Mualla Dear Participants of the World Stars Sharjah Online International Chess Championship 2020, On behalf of the Board of Directors of the Sharjah Cultural & Chess Club and the Organising Committee, I am delighted to welcome all our distinguished participants of the World Stars Sharjah Online International Chess Championship 2020! Unfortunately, due to the recent negative and unpleasant reality of the Corona-Virus, we had to cancel our annual live events in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. But we still decided to organise some other events online, like the World Stars Sharjah Online International Chess Championship 2020, in cooperation with the prestigious chess platform Internet Chess Club. The Sharjah Cultural & Chess Club was founded on June 1981 with the object of spreading and development of chess as mental and cultural sport across the Sharjah Emirate and in the United Arab Emirates territory in general. As on 2020 we are celebrating the 39th anniversary of our Club I can promise some extra-ordinary events in close cooperation with FIDE, the Asian Chess Federation and the Arab Chess Federation for the coming year 2021, which will mark our 40th anniversary! For the time being we welcome you in our online event and promise that we will do our best to ensure that the World Stars Sharjah Online International Chess Championship
    [Show full text]
  • United Arab Emirates (Uae)
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: United Arab Emirates, July 2007 COUNTRY PROFILE: UNITED ARAB EMIRATES (UAE) July 2007 COUNTRY اﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴّﺔ اﻟﻤﺘّﺤﺪة (Formal Name: United Arab Emirates (Al Imarat al Arabiyah al Muttahidah Dubai , أﺑﻮ ﻇﺒﻲ (The seven emirates, in order of size, are: Abu Dhabi (Abu Zaby .اﻹﻣﺎرات Al ,ﻋﺠﻤﺎن Ajman , أ مّ اﻟﻘﻴﻮﻳﻦ Umm al Qaywayn , اﻟﺸﺎرﻗﺔ (Sharjah (Ash Shariqah ,دﺑﻲّ (Dubayy) .رأس اﻟﺨﻴﻤﺔ and Ras al Khaymah ,اﻟﻔﺠﻴﺮة Fajayrah Short Form: UAE. اﻣﺮاﺗﻰ .(Term for Citizen(s): Emirati(s أﺑﻮ ﻇﺒﻲ .Capital: Abu Dhabi City Major Cities: Al Ayn, capital of the Eastern Region, and Madinat Zayid, capital of the Western Region, are located in Abu Dhabi Emirate, the largest and most populous emirate. Dubai City is located in Dubai Emirate, the second largest emirate. Sharjah City and Khawr Fakkan are the major cities of the third largest emirate—Sharjah. Independence: The United Kingdom announced in 1968 and reaffirmed in 1971 that it would end its treaty relationships with the seven Trucial Coast states, which had been under British protection since 1892. Following the termination of all existing treaties with Britain, on December 2, 1971, six of the seven sheikhdoms formed the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The seventh sheikhdom, Ras al Khaymah, joined the UAE in 1972. Public holidays: Public holidays other than New Year’s Day and UAE National Day are dependent on the Islamic calendar and vary from year to year. For 2007, the holidays are: New Year’s Day (January 1); Muharram, Islamic New Year (January 20); Mouloud, Birth of Muhammad (March 31); Accession of the Ruler of Abu Dhabi—observed only in Abu Dhabi (August 6); Leilat al Meiraj, Ascension of Muhammad (August 10); first day of Ramadan (September 13); Eid al Fitr, end of Ramadan (October 13); UAE National Day (December 2); Eid al Adha, Feast of the Sacrifice (December 20); and Christmas Day (December 25).
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli–Palestinian Peacemaking January 2019 Middle East and North the Role of the Arab States Africa Programme
    Briefing Israeli–Palestinian Peacemaking January 2019 Middle East and North The Role of the Arab States Africa Programme Yossi Mekelberg Summary and Greg Shapland • The positions of several Arab states towards Israel have evolved greatly in the past 50 years. Four of these states in particular – Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the UAE and (to a lesser extent) Jordan – could be influential in shaping the course of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. • In addition to Egypt and Jordan (which have signed peace treaties with Israel), Saudi Arabia and the UAE, among other Gulf states, now have extensive – albeit discreet – dealings with Israel. • This evolution has created a new situation in the region, with these Arab states now having considerable potential influence over the Israelis and Palestinians. It also has implications for US positions and policy. So far, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the UAE and Jordan have chosen not to test what this influence could achieve. • One reason for the inactivity to date may be disenchantment with the Palestinians and their cause, including the inability of Palestinian leaders to unite to promote it. However, ignoring Palestinian concerns will not bring about a resolution of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, which will continue to add to instability in the region. If Arab leaders see regional stability as being in their countries’ interests, they should be trying to shape any eventual peace plan advanced by the administration of US President Donald Trump in such a way that it forms a framework for negotiations that both Israeli and Palestinian leaderships can accept. Israeli–Palestinian Peacemaking: The Role of the Arab States Introduction This briefing forms part of the Chatham House project, ‘Israel–Palestine: Beyond the Stalemate’.
    [Show full text]
  • Context, Field and Landscape of Audiovisual Translation in the Arab World
    Context, Field and Landscape of Audiovisual Translation in the Arab World Doctor Muhammad Y. GAMAL Australian Federal Government AUSTRALIA [email protected] Abstract: Translation, as a cultural mediation, builds bridges between the Arab world and the outside world, particularly the west and continues to occupy a pivotal place in Arab society. Over the past two centuries, and since the establishment of the school of translation in Cairo in 1835, translation has been viewed as a vehicle of Nahda (progress) and Tanweer (enlightenment). Over the past two decades, however, translation in the Arab world has been radically transformed both at the practice and policy levels. The turn of the new millennium has brought about changes that have shaken the state of affairs and challenged old thinking and the ways of doing things. First, digital technology has changed the way things are done from work, play and study to the ways we socialise, shop and entertain ourselves. Second, a report on human development in the Arab world published in 2002 by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), revealed the unhealthy state of translation in most Arab countries. The paper examines the state of audiovisual study in Arabic and invites scholars to focus a lot more on their own local environment. It argues that a quarter of a century after the conference that launched the concept of AVT in Europe in 1995, the time has come for Arab academia to start developing its (own) theoretical frameworks for the localisation of audiovisual translation studies with the view of making translation studies not only relevant to society but also to play the role it was envisaged two centuries earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cultural Sites of Al Ain (United Arab Emirates) No 1343
    Background This is a new nomination. The cultural sites of Al Ain (United Arab Emirates) Consultations ICOMOS consulted its International Scientific No 1343 Committees on Archaeological Heritage Management and on Cultural Landscapes, and several independent experts. Literature consulted (selection) Official name as proposed by the State Party The Cultural Sites of Al Ain (Hafit, Hili, Bidaa Bint Saud Al-Jabir Al-Sabah, S., Les Émirats du Golfe, histoire d'un and Oases Areas) peuple, Paris, 1980. Location Cleuziou, S., “French Archaeological Mission, 1st mission…”, Abu Dhabi Archaeology in the United Arab Émirates, vol I, 1977. Regions and districts of: Al Ain Central District, Al Jimi, Al Mutaredh, Al Mutawa’a, Al Muwaiji, Al Qattara, Bidaa Bint Cleuziou, S., et al., Essays on the late prehistory of the Arabian peninsula, Rome, 2002. Saud, Falaj Hazza, Hili, Jebel Hafit, Sanaiya and Shiab Al Ashkar Méry, S., Fine Wadi Suq Ware from Hili and Shimal Sites United Arab Emirates (United Arab Emirates): A Technological and Provenience Analysis, 1987. Brief description The various sites of Al Ain and its neighbouring region Said Al-Jahwari, N., “The agricultural basis of Umm an-Nar provide testimony to very ancient sedentary human society in the northern Oman peninsula (2500–2000 BC)”, occupation in a desert region. Occupied continuously Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy, 20-2, 2009. since the Neolithic, the region presents vestiges of Technical Evaluation Mission numerous protohistoric cultures, notably from the Bronze An ICOMOS technical evaluation mission visited the Age and the Iron Age. Very diverse in nature, these property from 11 to 16 October 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovating Irrigation Technologies –
    Innovating irrigation technologies – Four communities in the Southeastern Arabian Iron Age II 1 Sources of pictures (clockwise): Picture 1: Al-Tikriti 2010, 231 Picture 2: Cordoba and Del Cerro 2018, 95 Picture 3 : Charbonnier et al. 2017, 18 Picture 4: Map created by Anna Lipp, © WAJAP (www.wajap.nl) Contact details: Anna Lipp Hoge Rijndijk 94L 2313 KL Leiden [email protected] 0049 172 762 9184 2 Innovating irrigation technologies - Four communities in the Southeastern Arabian Iron Age II Innovating irrigation technologies. Four communities in the Southeastern Arabian Iron Age II. Anna Lipp MA Thesis Course and course code: MA thesis Archaeology, 4ARX-0910ARCH Supervisor: Dr. Bleda S. Düring Archaeology of the Near East University of Leiden, Faculty of Archaeology Leiden, 12.6.2019 final version 3 Table of contents Acknowlegdements p.4 Glossary p.5 I. Introduction and research questions p.6 II. Region and cultural history p.9 II.1 Geology p.9 II.2 Paleoclimate on the Arabian Peninsula p.11 II.3 Early Arabian Archaeology p.12 II.4 Iron Age Chronologies p.12 II.5 Settlement boom p.15 II.6 Settlement outlines p.18 II.7 Houses p.19 II.8 Columned rooms p.20 II.9 Subsistence activities and trade p.22 II.10 Pottery p.24 III. Theory and examples of irrigation systems, debates in Arabian Archaeology and methodology p.28 III.1 Theoretical approaches to irrigation p.28 III.2 Groundwater irrigation: wells for irrigation purposes p.30 III.3 Qanat-type falaj systems p.34 III.4 Gharrag falaj p.35 III.5 Ground- or surface water irrigation: Runoff irrigation p.36 III.6 Transporting water: mills p.37 III.7 Collecting water: cisterns p.39 III.8 Debates in Arabian Archaeology p.40 III.9 Methodology p.44 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivalry in the Middle East: the History of Saudi-Iranian Relations and Its Implications on American Foreign Policy
    BearWorks MSU Graduate Theses Summer 2017 Rivalry in the Middle East: The History of Saudi-Iranian Relations and its Implications on American Foreign Policy Derika Weddington Missouri State University, [email protected] As with any intellectual project, the content and views expressed in this thesis may be considered objectionable by some readers. However, this student-scholar’s work has been judged to have academic value by the student’s thesis committee members trained in the discipline. The content and views expressed in this thesis are those of the student-scholar and are not endorsed by Missouri State University, its Graduate College, or its employees. Follow this and additional works at: https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses Part of the Defense and Security Studies Commons, International Relations Commons, and the Near and Middle Eastern Studies Commons Recommended Citation Weddington, Derika, "Rivalry in the Middle East: The History of Saudi-Iranian Relations and its Implications on American Foreign Policy" (2017). MSU Graduate Theses. 3129. https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/3129 This article or document was made available through BearWorks, the institutional repository of Missouri State University. The work contained in it may be protected by copyright and require permission of the copyright holder for reuse or redistribution. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RIVALRY IN THE MIDDLE EAST: THE HISTORY OF SAUDI-IRANIAN RELATIONS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY A Masters Thesis Presented to The Graduate College of Missouri State University TEMPLATE In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science, Defense and Strategic Studies By Derika Weddington August 2017 RIVALARY IN THE MIDDLE EAST: THE HISTORY OF SAUDI-IRANIAN RELATIONS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY Defense and Strategic Studies Missouri State University, August 2017 Master of Science Derika Weddington ABSTRACT The history of Saudi-Iranian relations has been fraught.
    [Show full text]
  • Archives This Page Lists the Approximately 1,900 Archival Items
    Archives This page lists the approximately 1,900 archival items that are held by the N.E.S.T. Special Collections. The majority of these items are from the Syria Mission of the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions (ABCFM), and later of the Board of Foreign Missions of the Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A. (PCUSA), as well as affiliated institutions, such as the American Mission Press, the Chouir Conference Center, the Gerard Institution, the Anglo-American Church and N.E.S.T. itself. Items range from personal diaries of missionaries, correspondences, institutional records, brochures, school yearbooks, newspapers, pamphlets and stamps. Photographs and maps are listed in separate indexes due to their size, location in the Special Collection Room and descriptive details. The archives of the Syria Mission were originally organized by missionary James Willoughby in 1966, the index of which is archival item 432. Willoughby's arrangement was not preserved during the transference of the N.E.S.T. library to its location on Ras Beirut in 1974. As such, in 2012 a project was initiated under the title Preserving Protestant Heritage in the Middle East (PPHME) with the aim of reorganizing N.E.S.T.’s Special Collections. During the first phase of the PPHME the archival items were indexed according to the order that they were found. As a result, only some items are grouped according to affiliated organization. Part of the next phase of the PPHME project is to organize the archival material into subject areas. As such, each archival item is given a temporary inventory number (as opposed to a more permanent shelf mark).
    [Show full text]
  • Just Below the Surface: Israel, the Arab Gulf States and the Limits of Cooperation
    Middle East Centre JUST BELOW THE SURFACE ISRAEL, THE ARAB GULF STATES AND THE LIMITS OF COOPERATION IAN BLACK LSE Middle East Centre Report | March 2019 About the Middle East Centre The Middle East Centre builds on LSE’s long engagement with the Middle East and provides a central hub for the wide range of research on the region carried out at LSE. The Middle East Centre aims to enhance understanding and develop rigorous research on the societies, economies, polities and international relations of the region. The Centre promotes both special- ised knowledge and public understanding of this crucial area, and has outstanding strengths in interdisciplinary research and in regional expertise. As one of the world’s leading social science institutions, LSE comprises departments covering all branches of the social sciences. The Middle East Centre harnesses this expertise to promote innova- tive research and training on the region. Middle East Centre Just Below the Surface: Israel, the Arab Gulf States and the Limits of Cooperation Ian Black LSE Middle East Centre Report March 2019 About the Author Ian Black is a former Middle East editor, diplomatic editor and European editor for the Guardian newspaper. He is currently Visiting Senior Fellow at the LSE Middle East Centre. His latest book is entitled Enemies and Neighbours: Arabs and Jews in Palestine and Israel, 1917–2017. Abstract For over a decade Israel has been strengthening links with Arab Gulf states with which it has no diplomatic relations. Evidence of a convergence of Israel’s stra- tegic views with those of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Bahrain has accumulated as all displayed hostility to Iran’s regional ambitions and to United States President Barack Obama’s policies during the Arab Spring.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Annual Report 2007 by the Numbers
    Middle East Institute 2007 Annual Report 2007 By The Numbers MEI Adjunct Scholar 200 million George Harris the potential global speaks to a radio audience reached by audience in Raleigh, North Carolina. MEI through TV ap- pearances and print and online citations. A panel discussion at MEI’s 2007 Annual 600 Conference. record attendance at MEI’s 2007 Annual Conference. Department of Lan- guages and Regional Studies Chairman Over 900 Shukri Abed teaches an Arabic course at students registered for MEI’s MEI. languages and regional studies classes. The Middle East Journal staff works on an issue Every 10 minutes of MEJ. someone in the world down- loaded and read an article from MEJ. MEI Librarian Simon Braune mans the 4x circulation desk at in-house usage of the George the George Camp Camp Keiser Library quadru- Keiser Library. pled. Letter from the President Since its founding in 1946, the Middle East Institute (MEI) has pursued its mission to “promote knowledge of the Middle East in America and strengthen understanding of the United States by the peoples and govern- ments of the region.” The need for MEI is greater than ever. And, so is our impact. MEI strives to promote mutual respect through knowledge and under- standing. MEI’s goal is to expand the dialogue and expose Washington- based opinion leaders to authentic voices from the region itself. To accom- plish this, we brought newsmakers and prominent experts from the region and Europe. This successful formula has become the model for future MEI events. Embracing new technologies helps broaden our “vir- tual” audience.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oakland County Aclu Collection
    THE OAKLAND COUNTY ACLU COLLECTION Papers, 1970-1984 (Predominantly, 1978-1983) 4 ½ linear feet Accession Number 1170 L.C. Number The papers of the Oakland County American Civil Liberties Union (OCACLU) were placed in the Archives of Labor and Urban Affairs in April of 1984 by James Lafferty and were opened for research in April of 1990. James Lafferty began his work in the area of civil rights when he served as executive secretary for the National Lawyer's Guild in Detroit from 1964-67 and later as legal supervisor for a group of storefront lawyers operations. In his private practice he worked with other attorneys opposing American involvement in Vietnam, counseling young men of draft age. He also ran as a peace candidate in 1966 for Congress in the 17th District against Martha Griffiths. In 1975 Lafferty moved his firm Lafferty & Van Dyke to Birmingham, MI. He became interested in the issue of senior housing (PRIDE) after the initial two ballot defeats. He was elected as a permanent co-chairman to PRIDE and organized its steering committee. Eventually the activities of PRIDE (People Rallying in Defense of Equality) vs. the City of Birmingham lead to the city being sued by the United States government based on racially discriminatory practices. The timing of the PRIDE activities coincided with the formation of the Oakland County ACLU, a process begun in 1970 and finally consummated in December of 1979, based on the recommendation of the Metropolitan Detroit Branch of the ACLU to the Michigan State ACLU Board. The 1979 petition stated as some of the pressing civil liberty issues for the new organization to address as: over 1000 active Oakland County members of the ACLU, the Oakland County jail situation, the policy of giving lie detector tests to rape victims, housing rights of the elderly and retarded in Oakland County, the Oakland County prosecutor's attempts to reinstate the death penalty in Michigan.
    [Show full text]