M&A Review 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

M&A Review 2017 M&A Review 2017 1 M&A REVIEW 2017 Contents Foreword 6 Overview 8 Economic and financing climate 9 Mid-market reign 9 Sector watch 10 The continued rise of Fintech 13 FDI as a driving force 14 In-depth: Private equity - a key player 16 In-depth: Brexit focus 17 In-depth: Outbound dealmaking 18 Outlook for 2018 20 About William Fry 22 Contacts 23 3 Against a backdrop of significant macroeconomic and political uncertainty, 2017 saw a return to very healthy levels of transactional activity M&A REVIEW 2017 Key Trends in Irish M&A M&A Deal Volume Inbound Activity Private Equity Mid-market Activity Deal volume reached its Highest annual volume Highest year on record by highest total on volume Mergermarket record in 2017 OF TOTAL DEALS DEALS DISCLOSED VOLUME* WORTH WORTH UP FROM IN 2016 Key Sectors by Deal Volume A number of key sectors saw strong activity by volume, including: BUSINESS SERVICES TELECOMS, MEDIA AND FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSUMER TECHNOLOGY *figure represents deals with a disclosed value 5 WILLIAM FRY Foreword Welcome to the seventh edition of William Fry's The stellar performance in 2017 is renewed Irish M&A Review, published in association evidence of Ireland's strong economic growth, its with Mergermarket. business-friendly environment and ready access to capital for businesses. Early in February, the In last year's review, we commented on the European Commission announced that GDP muted Irish and global M&A landscape in late growth for Ireland was 7.3% in 2017. This is the Shane O'Donnell 2016. We further noted that while the volatile fastest growth rate in the EU. Indeed, Ireland has Head of Corporate/M&A global macroeconomic picture would have a outpaced all other eurozone economies for four T. +353 1 639 5112 strong bearing on the pace of M&A in 2017, we successive years. A relatively low corporate tax E. [email protected] expected Irish deal activity to rise as a result of rate, a flexible and multi-lingual workforce and Ireland's growth predictions and strong business a transparent legal system continue to underpin fundamentals. Ireland's attractiveness to overseas buyers – both strategic and private equity (PE). PE players were Against a backdrop of significant macroeconomic particularly active in the Irish market in 2017 and and political uncertainty, 2017 saw a return to very we expect to see this trend continue in 2018. healthy levels of transactional activity. Indeed, the number of deals targeting Irish assets actually Inbound dealmaking increased in 2017 to 93 reached its highest annual total on Mergermarket deals. Although the UK and US have traditionally record (since 2001), with the announcement of been the most dominant international acquirers, 143 transactions valued at €14.9bn. Mid-market Irish companies drew interest from a wide array businesses, the engine of the Irish economy, of jurisdictions in 2017 including Japan, Australia attracted significant M&A attention in 2017, and South Africa. This inbound activity also cementing their position as consistent drivers spanned a variety of sectors, highlighting the of M&A activity in Ireland. diverse range of growth-oriented businesses coming to market in Ireland. 6 M&A REVIEW 2017 Foreword While there was plenty of interest from foreign Ireland is proving to be an attractive option for players in the Irish market throughout 2017, large many such businesses and there is evidence and domestic corporates such as Kerry Group of some companies using the M&A market to plc, ICON plc, DCC plc and CRH plc also sought establish a first foothold. to enter new markets and diversify their portfolios abroad. Low interest rates and an abundance of We hope you find reading this year's edition of funding (in some part facilitated by the European the Irish M&A Review informative and as always Central Bank (ECB)'s continued quantitative we welcome your feedback. easing (QE) program) supported this growth. Outbound M&A increased its share in overall volume, from 39% to 42% year-on-year, reflecting good financing conditions and healthy balance sheets among Ireland's leading corporates. Shane O'Donnell In 2018, we expect that the ongoing Brexit Head of Corporate/M&A negotiations may have an influence on the level of inbound transactions. The UK was the biggest net source of professionals moving to Ireland in 2017 accounting for 21% of the net migration to Ireland during the period to October 2017. UK and international businesses concerned about marketing and distributing their products and services in the EU following the triggering of Article 50 are in increasing numbers considering relocation to mitigate the fallout from Brexit. 7 WILLIAM FRY Overview In M&A terms, Ireland performed well in 2017 in Irish M&A Quarterly Trends, 2011-2017 Volume Value (€m) the face of uncertainty in the foreign markets driven by factors such as Brexit and the divisive 60 40,000 new US administration. While 2017 saw fewer 35,000 megadeals than previous years resulting in the 50 drop in overall value year-on-year, a total of 143 30,000 deals worth €14.9bn were announced over the 40 25,000 year, representing a 5.9% increase in volume. €m Deal Value 30 20,000 As highlighted in earlier reports, the mid-market 15,000 which is traditionally a cornerstone for Irish 20 Number of deals M&A continues to draw interest from domestic 10,000 and international bidders alike. 2017 was no 10 5,000 exception, with dealmaking in the mid-market accounting for 93.5% of total volume (up from 0 0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 82.4% in 2016). Factors such as strong valuations 12 12 12 12 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 15 15 15 15 16 16 16 16 17 17 17 17 and growth focussed businesses are driving the high levels of activity. The total of 49 deals announced in the second quarter in particular between Ireland and the global investment of international players diverting their attention reflected strong mid-market growth. community. The bill represents a move towards away from the UK. However, uncertainty ensuring that Ireland retains a sound regulatory surrounding the nature of the Irish border would PE dealmaking experienced impressive growth environment in accordance with international hamper crucial trade relations with the UK and last year, perhaps proving itself to be an area standards. The change brought about by this could negatively affect M&A deals between the to watch in 2018. A total of 37 deals worth legislation should increase the options available two countries. €12.2bn were announced, more than double in Ireland for fund promoters (including venture the value of all announced PE deals in 2016. We capital and PE) which may have a knock-on-effect Further, the ECB's winding down of its QE are now starting to see the first signs of exits on M&A activity. program over the coming months may constrain for domestic PE funds, such as Carlyle Cardinal. dealmakers' ability to access capital and cause The Government approval of the drafting of the Looking forward, dealmakers will be watching the financing climate for Irish M&A to become Investment Limited Partnership (Amendment) Bill the Brexit negotiations closely this year. Brexit less liquid in 2018. 2017 will, it is hoped, strengthen the relationship holds potential benefits for Irish M&A in terms 8 M&A REVIEW 2017 Overview Further afield, the US government has legislated These economic indicators are above average The mid-market, which is for the most fundamental overhaul of US compared to the Eurozone and substantially corporate tax policy in decades, reducing the higher than what was predicted in the spring traditionally a main driver for Irish tax rate from 35% to 21%. The impact this will 2017 forecast. By comparison, the UK economy M&A, continues to draw interest have on Ireland's ability to continue to attract grew just 1.5%, according to the Office of from domestic and international significant levels of investment from American National Statistics, with growth expected to be companies is yet to be seen. limited over the next few years amid ongoing bidders alike. 2017 was no Brexit negotiations. exception, with dealmaking in the Despite an unpredictable macroeconomic climate, it is expected that Ireland's strong Ireland's economy has been given a significant mid-market accounting for 93.5% economic fundamentals will continue to boost over recent years due to the ECB's €1tn of total volume, up from 82.4% outweigh external destabilising factors, 2018 QE programme which began in 2015. The will follow on from the strong finish to 2017 program served to reduce borrowing costs to in 2016. Factors such as strong and we will continue to see healthy levels of a record low and stimulate economic growth. valuations and growth-hungry Irish M&A activity. The ECB has recently decided to wind down businesses are driving the high this programme and plans to cut the amount Economic and financing climate of bonds it purchases on a monthly basis from levels of activity. In a climate of widespread political uncertainty, €60bn to €30bn for a nine-month period. and with many currencies across the globe Although the announcement is broadly in line experiencing considerable volatility, the Irish with market expectations, it will likely affect 2020 given below-target inflation and continuing economy performed well in 2017. The European the levels of liquidity in the M&A financing slack in local labour markets, signalling a Commission predicted 4.8% growth for the environment in 2018.
Recommended publications
  • HSBC Became Aware of Online Accounts Being Accessed by Unauthorized Users Between October 4, 2018 and October 14, 2018
    <<Field_36>> <<Field_37>> <<Field_38>> <<Field_39>>, <<Field_40>> <<Field_41>><<Field_42>> <<First Name>> << Middle Name>> <<Last Name>> Date: November 2, 2018 <<Address 1>> <<Address 2>> <<Address 3>> <<City>>, <<State>> <<Zip>><<4 Digit Zip>> Notice of Data Breach What Happened? HSBC became aware of online accounts being accessed by unauthorized users between October 4, 2018 and October 14, 2018. When HSBC discovered your online account was impacted, we suspended online access to prevent further unauthorized entry of your account. You may have received a call or email from us so we could help you change your online banking credentials and access your account. If you need help accessing your account, please call <<Field_47>>. We apologize for this inconvenience. HSBC takes this very seriously and the security of your information is very important to us. What Information The information that may have been accessed includes your full name, mailing Was Involved? address, phone number, email address, date of birth, account numbers, account types, account balances, transaction history, payee account information, and statement history where available. What We Are We have enhanced our authentication process for HSBC Personal Internet Doing. Banking, adding an extra layer of security. Out of an abundance of caution and at our expense, HSBC is offering you a complimentary <<Field_43>>-year subscription to Identity Guard®, a credit monitoring and identity theft protection service. Identity Guard not only provides essential monitoring and protection of credit data, but also alerts you to certain activities that could indicate potential identity theft. This program is provided by Intersections Inc. (NASDAQ: INTX), a leading provider of consumer and corporate identity risk management services.
    [Show full text]
  • Top Trends Shaping Identity Verification (IDV) in 2018
    NOT LICENSED FOR DISTRIBUTION Top Trends Shaping Identity Verification (IDV) In 2018 Post-Equifax Breach, IDV Aggregators Will Cater To Multifaceted IDV Requirements by Andras Cser and Merritt Maxim March 29, 2018 Why Read This Report Key Takeaways In the face of increasing identity theft, stricter IDV Based On Credit Header Data Will Become compliance regulations, and the push for online Weaker — Get Ready To Fight Back customer acquisition, reliable, accurate, cost- After the 2017 Equifax breach, we entered a new effective, and easy-to-use identity verification era in which credit header data for IDV solutions (IDV) is becoming a core building block of any and knowledge-based authentication (KBA) customer or employee identity and access are inadequate for reliable identity verification. management (IAM) system. This document Firms will have to adopt new lower cost and less highlights the key trends shaping the IDV market intrusive IDV technologies, such as those based in 2018 and beyond and helps security and risk on device reputation or phone number. pros adapt their strategies, vendor selection, and Social And Behavioral IDV Will Lower Costs implementation. And Improve Accuracy Social IDV, based on comparing identity attributes to profiles on social media, and behavioral biometrics, verifying identities based on how a user moves the mouse or touches the screen, will lower the cost and improve the accuracy of day- to-day IDV across all verticals. FORRESTER.COM FOR SECURITY & RISK PROFESSIONALS Top Trends Shaping Identity Verification
    [Show full text]
  • Parker Review
    Ethnic Diversity Enriching Business Leadership An update report from The Parker Review Sir John Parker The Parker Review Committee 5 February 2020 Principal Sponsor Members of the Steering Committee Chair: Sir John Parker GBE, FREng Co-Chair: David Tyler Contents Members: Dr Doyin Atewologun Sanjay Bhandari Helen Mahy CBE Foreword by Sir John Parker 2 Sir Kenneth Olisa OBE Foreword by the Secretary of State 6 Trevor Phillips OBE Message from EY 8 Tom Shropshire Vision and Mission Statement 10 Yvonne Thompson CBE Professor Susan Vinnicombe CBE Current Profile of FTSE 350 Boards 14 Matthew Percival FRC/Cranfield Research on Ethnic Diversity Reporting 36 Arun Batra OBE Parker Review Recommendations 58 Bilal Raja Kirstie Wright Company Success Stories 62 Closing Word from Sir Jon Thompson 65 Observers Biographies 66 Sanu de Lima, Itiola Durojaiye, Katie Leinweber Appendix — The Directors’ Resource Toolkit 72 Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Thanks to our contributors during the year and to this report Oliver Cover Alex Diggins Neil Golborne Orla Pettigrew Sonam Patel Zaheer Ahmad MBE Rachel Sadka Simon Feeke Key advisors and contributors to this report: Simon Manterfield Dr Manjari Prashar Dr Fatima Tresh Latika Shah ® At the heart of our success lies the performance 2. Recognising the changes and growing talent of our many great companies, many of them listed pool of ethnically diverse candidates in our in the FTSE 100 and FTSE 250. There is no doubt home and overseas markets which will influence that one reason we have been able to punch recruitment patterns for years to come above our weight as a medium-sized country is the talent and inventiveness of our business leaders Whilst we have made great strides in bringing and our skilled people.
    [Show full text]
  • Licensed By: TABLE of CONTENTS
    Licensed by: TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Recommendations .......................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Toward a New Model of Identity Proofing ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Designing a Robust ID Proofing Workflow ................................................................................................................................... 12 Introducing Javelin’s FIT Model .................................................................................................................................................... 13 Overall ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Functional ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Innovative ....................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wolters Kluwer Governance Roadshow
    Wolters Kluwer Governance Roadshow Selection & Remuneration Committee of the Supervisory Board of Wolters Kluwer September, 2020 Governance Roadshow, September 2020 1 Forward-looking statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements. These statements may be identified by words such as "expect", "should", "could", "shall", and similar expressions. Wolters Kluwer cautions that such forward-looking statements are qualified by certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from what is contemplated by the forward-looking statements. Factors which could cause actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements may include, without limitation, general economic conditions, conditions in the markets in which Wolters Kluwer is engaged, behavior of customers, suppliers and competitors, technological developments, the implementation and execution of new ICT systems or outsourcing, legal, tax, and regulatory rules affecting Wolters Kluwer's businesses, as well as risks related to mergers, acquisitions and divestments. In addition, financial risks, such as currency movements, interest rate fluctuations, liquidity and credit risks could influence future results. The foregoing list of factors should not be construed as exhaustive. Wolters Kluwer disclaims any intention or obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Growth rates are cited in constant currencies unless otherwise noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Workers' Compensation Payer List (PDF)
    WORKERS' COMPENSATION / AUTO PAYER LIST 09/10/2021 All WORK * Provider must be contracted with Carisk Payer ID TX MN CA IL LA NJ NY OR WI NC NM OK TN VA States 837P 837I COMP AUTO 835 *Carisk Imaging to Allstate Insurance - Auto Only E1069 x x x x Rejects Only *Carisk Imaging to Geico (Auto Only) GEICO x x x x Rejects Only *Carisk Imaging to Nationwide (Auto Only) A0002 x x x x Rejects Only *Carisk Imaging to New York City Law Department NYCL001 x x x x Rejects Only *Carisk Imaging to NJ-PLIGA E3926 x x x x Rejects Only *Carisk Imaging to North Dakota WSI NDWSI x x x x *Carisk Imaging to NYSIF NYSIF1510 x x x x Rejects Only *Carisk Imaging to Progressive Insurance (Auto Only) E1139 x x x x Rejects Only *Carisk Imaging to Pure (Auto Only) PURE01 x x x x Rejects Only *Carisk Imaging to Safeco Insurance (Auto Only) E0602 x x x x Rejects Only *Carisk Imaging to SafeTPA, LLC (NY Only) SAFE01 x x x x Rejects Only *Carisk Imaging to Selective Insurance (Auto Only) E1077 x x x x Rejects Only *Carisk Imaging to USAA (Auto Only) A0001 x x x x Rejects Only 1st Auto & Casualty J1585 x x x x x 21st Century Insurance 41556 x x x x Rejects Only 22125 Roscoe Corp. 41556 x x x x Rejects Only AAA Minnesota/Iowa 11983 x x x x x AAA Northern California, Nevada & Utah Insurance Exchange 41556 x x x x Rejects Only ABC Const.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 1: Parker Review Survey Results As at 2 November 2020
    Annex 1: Parker Review survey results as at 2 November 2020 The data included in this table is a representation of the survey results as at 2 November 2020, which were self-declared by the FTSE 100 companies. As at March 2021, a further seven FTSE 100 companies have appointed directors from a minority ethnic group, effective in the early months of this year. These companies have been identified through an * in the table below. 3 3 4 4 2 2 Company Company 1 1 (source: BoardEx) Met Not Met Did Not Submit Data Respond Not Did Met Not Met Did Not Submit Data Respond Not Did 1 Admiral Group PLC a 27 Hargreaves Lansdown PLC a 2 Anglo American PLC a 28 Hikma Pharmaceuticals PLC a 3 Antofagasta PLC a 29 HSBC Holdings PLC a InterContinental Hotels 30 a 4 AstraZeneca PLC a Group PLC 5 Avast PLC a 31 Intermediate Capital Group PLC a 6 Aveva PLC a 32 Intertek Group PLC a 7 B&M European Value Retail S.A. a 33 J Sainsbury PLC a 8 Barclays PLC a 34 Johnson Matthey PLC a 9 Barratt Developments PLC a 35 Kingfisher PLC a 10 Berkeley Group Holdings PLC a 36 Legal & General Group PLC a 11 BHP Group PLC a 37 Lloyds Banking Group PLC a 12 BP PLC a 38 Melrose Industries PLC a 13 British American Tobacco PLC a 39 Mondi PLC a 14 British Land Company PLC a 40 National Grid PLC a 15 BT Group PLC a 41 NatWest Group PLC a 16 Bunzl PLC a 42 Ocado Group PLC a 17 Burberry Group PLC a 43 Pearson PLC a 18 Coca-Cola HBC AG a 44 Pennon Group PLC a 19 Compass Group PLC a 45 Phoenix Group Holdings PLC a 20 Diageo PLC a 46 Polymetal International PLC a 21 Experian PLC a 47
    [Show full text]
  • Ftse4good UK 50
    2 FTSE Russell Publications 19 August 2021 FTSE4Good UK 50 Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Index weight Index weight Index weight Constituent Country Constituent Country Constituent Country (%) (%) (%) 3i Group 0.81 UNITED GlaxoSmithKline 5.08 UNITED Rentokil Initial 0.67 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Anglo American 2.56 UNITED Halma 0.74 UNITED Rio Tinto 4.68 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Antofagasta 0.36 UNITED HSBC Hldgs 6.17 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell A 4.3 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Associated British Foods 0.56 UNITED InterContinental Hotels Group 0.64 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell B 3.75 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM AstraZeneca 8.25 UNITED International Consolidated Airlines 0.47 UNITED Schroders 0.28 UNITED KINGDOM Group KINGDOM KINGDOM Aviva 1.15 UNITED Intertek Group 0.65 UNITED Segro 0.95 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Barclays 2.1 UNITED Legal & General Group 1.1 UNITED Smith & Nephew 0.99 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM BHP Group Plc 3.2 UNITED Lloyds Banking Group 2.39 UNITED Smurfit Kappa Group 0.74 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM BT Group 1.23 UNITED London Stock Exchange Group 2.09 UNITED Spirax-Sarco Engineering 0.72 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Burberry Group 0.6 UNITED Mondi 0.67 UNITED SSE 1.13 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Coca-Cola HBC AG 0.37 UNITED National Grid 2.37 UNITED Standard Chartered 0.85 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Compass Group 1.96 UNITED Natwest Group 0.77 UNITED Tesco 1.23 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM CRH 2.08 UNITED Next 0.72 UNITED Unilever 7.99 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM
    [Show full text]
  • Constituents & Weights
    2 FTSE Russell Publications 19 August 2021 FTSE 100 Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Index weight Index weight Index weight Constituent Country Constituent Country Constituent Country (%) (%) (%) 3i Group 0.59 UNITED GlaxoSmithKline 3.7 UNITED RELX 1.88 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Admiral Group 0.35 UNITED Glencore 1.97 UNITED Rentokil Initial 0.49 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Anglo American 1.86 UNITED Halma 0.54 UNITED Rightmove 0.29 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Antofagasta 0.26 UNITED Hargreaves Lansdown 0.32 UNITED Rio Tinto 3.41 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Ashtead Group 1.26 UNITED Hikma Pharmaceuticals 0.22 UNITED Rolls-Royce Holdings 0.39 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Associated British Foods 0.41 UNITED HSBC Hldgs 4.5 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell A 3.13 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM AstraZeneca 6.02 UNITED Imperial Brands 0.77 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell B 2.74 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Auto Trader Group 0.32 UNITED Informa 0.4 UNITED Royal Mail 0.28 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Avast 0.14 UNITED InterContinental Hotels Group 0.46 UNITED Sage Group 0.39 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Aveva Group 0.23 UNITED Intermediate Capital Group 0.31 UNITED Sainsbury (J) 0.24 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Aviva 0.84 UNITED International Consolidated Airlines 0.34 UNITED Schroders 0.21 UNITED KINGDOM Group KINGDOM KINGDOM B&M European Value Retail 0.27 UNITED Intertek Group 0.47 UNITED Scottish Mortgage Inv Tst 1 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM BAE Systems 0.89 UNITED ITV 0.25 UNITED Segro 0.69 UNITED KINGDOM
    [Show full text]
  • Copy of Draft Customer Privacy Policy July 2021 V3.0 CLEAN
    Privacy Policy Version number: 4.0 Date published: 27/09/2021 The Registered Office of Shell Energy Retail Limited is Shell Energy House, Westwood Business Park, Westwood Way, Coventry CV4 8HS, UK. Registered in England and Wales. Company number 05070887. 1 Privacy Policy Version number: 4.0 Policy date: 27/09/2021 Shell Energy is committed to ensuring the privacy and security of your personal data. This Privacy Policy explains what personal data are processed about you, why we are processing your personal data and for which purposes, how long we hold your personal data for, how to access and update your personal data, as well as the options you have regarding your personal data and where to go for further information. In this Privacy Policy, when we refer to "personal data", we mean information which could directly identify you (for example, your name or national insurance number) and information which could indirectly identify you, meaning that it could identify you when combined with other information which we hold about you (for example, your gender or date of birth). "Process" or "processing" means just about any conceivable use of personal data, including recording, storing, viewing or disclosing personal data. Shell Energy Retail Limited (company number 05070887) is the data controller of your personal data (referred to in this Policy as “Shell Energy” or “we”). If you have any questions about your personal data which are not answered by this Policy, please contact our Data Protection Officer: By post: Data Protection Officer Shell Energy, Shell Energy House, Westwood Business Park, Westwood Way Coventry, CV4 8HS.
    [Show full text]
  • The People Who Matter Your Vote on European Private Equity’S Most Influential
    olympic opportunitiEs > vEndor financing > partEch’s parting RealDeals 14 august 2008 For Europe’s private equity professional » E u r o p E The people who matter Your vote on European private equity’s most influential www.rEaldEals.Eu.com 20 MOST influential A tumultuous 12 months on from the onset of the credit crunch, we asked 500 of the industry’s biggest hitters to name the most powerful people in European private equity. 1: GUY HANDS (8) Guy Hands, chief executive of Terra Firma, The man who holds the future of embattled is embroiled in the most highly publicised music business EMI in his hands has shot to the private equity deal of recent times. But while top of the 20 most influential list this year as he all about him appear to doubt, he has remained attempts to drag the company’s creative prima committed to bringing uncompromising donnas into economic reality in the full glare of leveraged buyout efficiency to the extravagant the public spotlight. muso world. Despite frequent spats with pop idols – Robbie Williams’ manager accused Hands of running the business like a plantation owner – and a string of celebrity departures, including the Rolling Stones and Radiohead, as well as the painful fall-out of 2,000 job losses and the impact of the credit crunch on the deal itself, this unlikely rock and roll legend has managed to swing a company, hitherto spouting losses, into profit over recent months. There is still a long way to go before Hands can be declared a hit, of course, but what is clear is that the impact of the £3.2bn (¤4bn) deal will spread way beyond EMI’s walls.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Equity's Broken Pension Promises
    ANNUAL CONGRESS SUNDAY 3RD JUNE–THURSDAY 7TH JUNE 2007 PRIVATE EQUITY’S BROKEN PENSION PROMISES PRIVATE EQUITY COMPANIES’ LINKS TO INSOLVENT PENSION FUNDS A CEC SPECIAL REPORT 2007 contents was only when the same private equity companies made an £8billion bid for Insolvent pension schemes Sainsbury’s that the growing role of private equity in the economy became a Chapter 1 2 public issue. Insolvent pension The private equity companies and the multi-millionaire elite that run them schemes and the link and the link to private equity are desperate to portray themselves as growers of jobs,of innovation and of to private equity being vital to the well being of the economy.They are most anxious to shed their companies companies asset stripping image,to shed the impression that they enjoy favourable tax advantages and to shed the notion that the whole industry is simply a Chapter 2 5 mechanism for the multi-millionaire elite to enrich themselves at the expense Some of the In the spring of 2007 the GMB Central Executive Council (CEC)asked that a of GMB members and the general public. multimillionaire detailed study be undertaken to establish the links between insolvent pension elite who have The Treasury Select Committee has set up an enquiry into the role of private funds and private equity companies.At that time there was much controversy amassed a fortune equity and GMB has submitted evidence to it.This report forms part of the GMB in the media about the role of private equity companies in the UK economy. from the private supplementary evidence
    [Show full text]