Electoral Area Directors Committee Agenda October 11, 2005, 10:00 AM SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster St., Pemberton, BC
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info
1 Call to Order
2 Approval of Agenda 9
3 Minutes
3.1 Minutes of September 12, 2005 4 9 For approval as circulated or as corrected.
4 Business arising from the Minutes
4.1 UBCM New Deal Update for Tier 2 Local Government 11 9 (Forwarded from Sept Agenda for Discussion)
5 Delegations/Petitions
5.1 School District No. 74 – Trustee David Watkins (Potential for New Schools)
6 Reports
6.1 Building Department Monthly Report 14 9 THAT the Building Department monthly report be received.
6.2 Manger of Planning and Development - Bylaw 948 - 22 9 Raven’s Crest Developments, Electoral Area C
1. THAT the Planning Department report on the Ravens Crest rezoning application be received for information;
2. THAT the referral responses from the Agricultural Land Commission, Ministry of Transportation, Pemberton Valley Trails Association, Vancouver Coastal Health Authority and Village of Pemberton be received;
3. THAT the applicants be requested to complete the following items prior to consideration of second reading and
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 1 of 93 SLRD Electoral Area Directors - 2 - October 11, 2005 Committee Agenda
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info
scheduling of a public hearing for zoning amendment bylaw No.948, 2005:
(1) Proof of adequate water supply (quantity and quality) to serve the proposed development through completion of a hydrology study and on-site testing by a qualified professional engineer to the written satisfaction of the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority; (2) Confirmation of adequate soils and slope conditions to permit on-site sewage disposal to the written satisfaction of the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority; (3) Proof of adequate access to the site through completion of an intersection design on Highway 99, to the satisfaction of the Ministry of Transportation; (4) Written support of access across the railway right-of- way from CN Rail; (5) Written support for the subdivision and access from the Agricultural Land Commission;
4. THAT staff process the ALR application concurrently with the above items.
6.3 Community Planner - Subdivision in the ALR John & 41 9 Kathy Barr – Electoral Area C THAT the Regional District forward the application for a subdivision within the ALR of that part of D.L. 170, 1538 and 5673, shown on Plan B 5182, Lillooet Land District to the Agricultural Land Commission with the following comment:
1. The SLRD recommends approval of this application.
6.4 Planner - DVP #053 for DL 8011, LLD, (Longley) Electoral 48 9 Area A THAT Development Variance Permit #053 to increase the permitted height of an accessory building under section 9.2 of Zoning Bylaw No. 670 from 4.00 m (13.12 ft) to 5.30 m (21.50 ft) on DL 8011, Except Plan KAP 72883 (2585 Lakeview Road, Gun Lake, Electoral Area ‘A’), be issued.
6.5 Planner - Temporary Commercial use Permit Authorization 55 9 By-law No. 965-2005, (Backcountry Snowcats Ltd.) Electoral Area C
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 2 of 93 SLRD Electoral Area Directors - 3 - October 11, 2005 Committee Agenda
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info
THAT Bylaw 965-2005 cited as “Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Temporary Use Permit Authorization Bylaw No. 965-2005 be read a first time and referred to provincial agencies and First Nations for comment.
6.6 Planner - Rezoning Application: Lot 15, DL 165, Plan 883, 61 9 LLD, Arthur Moody, Electoral Area C THAT Bylaw 964 cited as, “Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 964-2005,” be introduced and read a first time, and referred to affected provincial agencies and the Area C Agricultural Advisory Committee for comment.
6.7 Planner - Temporary Use Permit # 5 Renewal – Doug 67 9 O’Mara, Whistler-Heli Skiing THAT Temporary Use Permit #5 for Whistler-Heli Skiing be renewed for a period of one year until January 24, 2007.
AND THAT the security provided in conjunction with Temporary Use Permit #5 be extended for a further year in conjunction with the permit renewal.
7 Correspondence
7.1 Correspondence Requesting Action
7.1.2 Pemberton & District Chamber of Commerce – Letter of 76 9 Support Requested
7.2 Correspondence for Information
7.1.2 Community Tourism Program – Calculating Error 82 9
8 Directors’ Reports
9 Late Items
10 Termination
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 3 of 93 SQUAMISH-LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT
Minutes of an Electoral Area Directors Committee Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District held in the SLRD Boardroom on September 12, 2005 at 11:00 AM.
In attendance:
Committee: Chair R. Oakley (Area A), Directors M. Macri (Area B), S. Gimse (Area C), J. Turner (Area D)
Staff: Administrator P. Edgington, Community Planner L. Griffith, Planner J. Leung, Recording Secretary A. Larsen
Other: None
1 Call to Order
Chair Oakley called the meeting to order at 10:59AM.
2 Approval of Agenda
The following additions were made to the Agenda:
8.1(a)Director Gimse - Crystal Meth Program Funding (b)Director Gimse - Canada Week Committee Funding 8.2 Director Turner - Northern Development Initiative 8.3 Director Macri - Hwy 99 Paving and Improvements
9.4 Director Oakley - Sewage Disposal Line Diversion (Outstanding Invoice) 9.5 Director Turner - Sea to Sky Trails Meeting Update
It was moved by Director Marci and seconded by Director Gimse:
THAT the Agenda be approved as amended.
CARRIED
3 Minutes
3.1 Minutes of July 11, 2005
It was moved by Director Turner and seconded Director Gimse:
THAT the minutes of the Electoral Area Directors Committee meeting held July 11, 2005 be approved.
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 4 of 93 This is page 2 of the minutes of a meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area Directors Committee, held on September 12, 2005.
CARRIED
4 Business arising from the Minutes
5 Delegations/Petitions
6 Reports
6.1 Building Department Monthly Report
It was moved by Director Gimse and seconded by Director Turner:
THAT the Building Department monthly report be received.
CARRIED
6.2 Bylaw 955 – Unsightly Premises Bylaw within the limits of Electoral Area D
It was moved by Director Turner and seconded by Director Gimse:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT Bylaw 955, cited as SLRD Electoral Area D unsightly premise Bylaw No. 955, 2005, be read a third time and adopted.
CARRIED
6.3 Administrator – Emergency Management Program – Preliminary Budget and Tax Implications
It was moved by Director Gimse and seconded by Director Turner:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT the Strategic Plan and the Emergency Response and Recovery Plan of the SLRD be distributed by CD to all Board Members for review and discussion and placed on the September Board Agenda.
CARRIED
6.4 Manager of Planning and Development – GVRD Draft Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw 1028
It was moved by Director Gimse and seconded by Director Macri :
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 5 of 93 This is page 3 of the minutes of a meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area Directors Committee, held on September 12, 2005.
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT the Greater Vancouver Regional District be advised that SLRD interests are unaffected by draft Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw 1028, 2005.
CARRIED
6.5 Manager of Planning and Development - Furry Creek Golf Course: Liquor Primary Licence Application; Electoral Area D
It was moved by Director Turner and seconded by Director Macri:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch be advised that the Squamish- Lillooet Regional District Board recommends the issuance of the liquor primary licence for Furry Creek Golf Course with an occupant load of 74 persons for the following reasons:
(a) It does not involve expansion of the Club House; (b) The licence could improve the economic viability and success of the Golf Club; (c) There is adequate separation of the licensed facilities from the residential uses;
AND THAT the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch be requested to have the applicant gather the views of the public regarding this application;
AND THAT, if approved, the liquor license for the Furry Creek Golf Course allow for year round operations of the licensed facilities;
AND THAT the SLRD Regional Board advise the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch that the Board does not wish to provide further comments or input on this application.
CARRIED
6.6 Community Planner – Non-farm use in the ALR/ P. Staehli, Pemberton Fringe; Electoral Area C
It was moved by Director Turner and seconded by Director Oakley:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 6 of 93 This is page 4 of the minutes of a meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area Directors Committee, held on September 12, 2005.
THAT the Regional Board not support the application for non-farm use in the ALR to allow for a second dwelling as it is not consistent with SLRD bylaws.
CARRIED
6.7 Planning Clerk - Development Variance Permit; Lot 1, Plan 35075, DL 5637; Electoral Area A, J. Roger
It was moved by Director Gimse and seconded by Director Turner:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT the application for a Development Variance Permit on Lot 1, Plan 35075, DL 5637, LLD, to increase the height provision for an auxiliary building from 4.0 metres to 6.0 metres be approved and the DVP issued.
CARRIED
7 Correspondence
7.1 Correspondence Requesting Action
7.1.2 District of Lillooet – CN Rail Derailment
It was moved by Director Gimse and seconded by Director Turner:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT the Board forward a letter of support regarding the CN Rail derailment of August 5, 2005 to the District of Lillooet with copies sent to the Ministry of Transportation, CN, and the Minister’s office.
AND THAT the District of Lillooet’s letter be attached to the letter of support sent to the above agencies.
CARRIED
7.1.3 Seton Portage/Shalalth & District Chamber of Commerce – Funding for Quick Attack Wildfire System
It was moved by Director Macri and seconded by Director Gimse:
THAT funding be given to the Seton Portage/Shalalth & District Chamber of Commerce in the amount of $15,500 from Area B Select Funds for the Quick
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 7 of 93 This is page 5 of the minutes of a meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area Directors Committee, held on September 12, 2005.
Attack Wildfire System.
CARRIED
7.2 Correspondence for Information
7.2.1 School District No. 48 - Meeting Request
It was moved by Director Gimse and seconded by Director Macri:
THAT the letter from School District No. 48 be received for information.
CARRIED
8 Directors’ Reports
8.1(a) Director Gimse – Crystal Meth Program Funding
It was moved by Director Gimse and seconded by Director Macri:
THAT 1,500.00 from Area C Select Funds be granted to the Crystal Meth Program in partnership with the Village of Pemberton and Mt. Currie.
CARRIED
8.1(b) Director Gimse – Canada Week Committee
It was moved by Director Gimse and seconded by Director Turner:
THAT $400.00 from Area C Select Funds be forwarded to the Canada Week Committee to aid in remaining costs.
CARRIED
8.2 Director Turner – Northern Development Trust
It was moved by Director Gimse and seconded by Director Macri:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT submission of a grant application by the Chair to the Northern Development Trust be requested in support of the 911 Emergency Call System.
CARRIED
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 8 of 93 This is page 6 of the minutes of a meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area Directors Committee, held on September 12, 2005.
8.3 Director Macri – Highway 99 Paving and Improvements
It was moved by Director Macri and seconded by Director Turner:
THAT It be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT a letter be sent to the Ministry of Transportation expressing concern over the delay of promised improvements to Highway 99 north and east of Lillooet.
CARRIED
It was moved by Director Macri and seconded by Director Turner:
THAT the letter include a request for rumble strips to be installed along Highway 99 during this planned upgrade.
CARRIED
Recess and Reconvene
The meeting was recessed for lunch at 12:25 PM and reconvened at 1:06 PM.
9 Late Items
9.1 UBCM New Deal Update for Tier 2 Local Government
This item will be forwarded to the October Electoral Area Directors Committee meeting, possibly to be scheduled at 10:00AM to allow time for consideration.
9.2 UBCM Tourism Funding Now Available
It was moved by Director Gimse and seconded by Director Macri:
It be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT the Board support the eligible projects, based on an equal four-way split of funds between the four electoral areas, provided the program criteria is met.
CARRIED
9.3 Gold Bridge Community Club – Request for Funding
It was moved by Director Gimse and seconded by Director Macri:
THAT $1400.00 from Area A Select Funds be granted to the Gold Bridge
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 9 of 93 This is page 7 of the minutes of a meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area Directors Committee, held on September 12, 2005.
Community Club for painting materials and labour.
CARRIED
9.4 Director Oakley – Sewage Disposal Line Diversion (Outstanding Invoice)
It was moved by Director Gimse and Seconded by Director Macri:
THAT the amount of $5414.31 for repair work done on the sewage disposal line diversion be transferred from Area A Select Funds to the Bralorne Sewer System.
CARRIED
9.5 Director Turner – Sea to Sky Trails Update
Director Turner gave a brief verbal update of activity at the last Sea to Sky Trails meeting.
10 Termination
The meeting was terminated at 2:07 PM.
Russ Oakley Paul R. Edgington Chair Administrator
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 10 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 11 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 12 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 13 of 93
To: Electoral Area Directors Committee
From: Arlene McClean, Building/Planning Clerk
Date: October 3, 2005
Monthly Report for September 2005 REPORT Re:
Courses/Meetings
The Building Inspector did not attend any meetings in September.
Non-Building By-law Enforcement
There was no non-building by-law enforcement in September.
Stop Work Orders
There were three Stop Work Orders posted in the month of September.
SWO # Construction/Address Date Details 130 9390 Pemberton 30/08/2005 • Stop Work Order #130 posted for building Portage Road, a 9’ x 13’ shed too close to Highway R/W Pemberton without a valid building permit. 131 7753 Pemberton 30/08/2005 • Stop Work Order #131 posted for Portage Road, construction of a shelter without building Pemberton permit. BP Application submitted September 1, 2005. 132 Pemberton Portage 13/09/2005 • Stop Work Order #132 posted for removal Road of a derelict structure without a valid demolition permit. Demolition Permit issued September 22, 2005.
Update on Outstanding Stop Work Orders (New details appear in italics)
SWO # Construction/Address Date Details 105 Ring Creek Road 19/08/2004 • Stop Work Order #105 posted for construction of a 9’ x 16’ accessory building without a valid building permit. 01/11/2004 • Property Owner to be located. Building Inspector to follow up with GPS reading on site. 30/11/2004 • Due to time constraints, Building Inspector
L:\Building Dept\reports\2005\09 September mf report.doc SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 14 of 93 Building Inspectors Report to the Regional Board Page 2 September 2005
will follow up with Planning Department for closure prior to the end of the year. 30/12/2004 • Building Inspector returned to site with GPS unit. Property owner will be determined and Registered Letter to be sent out. 04/07/2005 • Incorrect Property Owner identified. Correspondence forwarded to correct property owner. We are awaiting submission of application. 29/07/2005 • Follow up letter requesting application sent. Staff to continue to monitor. 01/09/2005 • Building Permit Application given to property owner by Building Inspector August 28th, 2005. We are awaiting submission. 13/09/2005 • Building Clerk spoke with property owner. Application to be submitted in October. 120 9842 Anderson Place, 21/06/2005 • Stop Work Order #120 posted for Pemberton, BC construction of an outbuilding without a valid building permit. 29/07/2005 • No response to date. Building Inspector to re-inspect and photo. Report to Board to be submitted for the September 26, 2005 Board Meeting. 01/09/2005 • Building Permit Application given to property owner by Building Inspector August 30th, 2005. We are awaiting submission. 03/10/2005 • No application received to date. Notice on Title recommended. • Notice on Title Report to be considered at the November Regular Meeting of the Regional Board. 124 #16 Britannia Crescent 04/08/2005 • Stop Work Order #124 posted for building covered deck without a valid building permit. • Owner has removed structure. 125 Lot 6, Dog Haven 11/08/2005 • Stop Work Order #125 posted for Lane, Upper Squamish construction of a 38’ x 41’ garage without a building permit. • Building Permit Issued. 126 Lot 6, Dog Haven 11/08/2005 • Stop Work Order #126 posted for Lane, Upper Squamish placement of an 8’ x 40‘ container without a building permit • Owner has advised that this “tool crib”
L:\Building Dept\reports\2005\09 September mf report.doc SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 15 of 93 Building Inspectors Report to the Regional Board Page 3 September 2005
will be removed once the garage is completed. 127 161 Furry Creek Drive 18/08/2005 • Stop Work Order #127 posted for construction of a detached sundeck & gazebo without a building permit • Building Permit Issued. 128 Collins Road, 23/08/2005 • Stop Work Order #128 posted for Pemberton placement of an 8’ x 40’ container without a building permit • Property Owner will be submitting plans for Single Family Dwelling – Container on property as a temporary measure. 129 Collins Road, 23/08/2005 • Stop Work Order #129 posted for Pemberton placement of a 10’4” x 14’4” accessory building without a building permit. • We are awaiting plans for submission.
General
There were 26 applications received and 14 permits issued in the month of September. Please see attached Statistics report for details.
Respectfully submitted,
Arlene McClean Building/Planning Clerk
L:\Building Dept\reports\2005\09 September mf report.doc SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 16 of 93 Building Department Monthly Report
Building Statistics Summary For September 2005
Type of Permit No. Permit Value Application Fee Permit Fee
Residence Mobile/Modular Home 1$ 92,400.00 $ 100.00 $ 340.50 Duplex Multi Family Commercial Building Industrial Building Institutional Building Garages/Carports 1$ 73,350.00 $ 100.00 $ 677.00 Sheds/Workshops Alt./Add to Dwelling 7$ 121,700.00 $ 700.00 $ 1,056.00 Alt./Add to Commercial Alt./Add to Industrial Alt./Add to Institutional Wood Stoves 4$ 8,000.00 $ 400.00 $ 20.00 Farm Buildings & Misc. Demolition Permits 1$ 10,000.00 $ 100.00 $ 5.00 Retaining Wall Moving Permit -All Bldgs Ex.Fm
TOTAL 14$ 305,450.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 2,098.50
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 17 of 93 Permit Totals
September-05 Permit Totals to Date
Permit Value Permit Fees # Permit Value Permit Fees # 2005 $ 305,450.00 $ 2,098.50 14$ 7,139,408.00 $ 67,013.53 92 2004 $ 1,185,743.00 $ 8,104.30 18$ 8,600,423.50 $ 78,676.40 98 2003 $ 2,054,918.00 $ 16,276.70 15$ 9,819,961.00 $ 86,751.58 85 2002 $ 1,594,220.00 $ 16,646.90 16$ 7,136,544.00 $ 70,448.40 73 2001 $ 656,440.00 $ 5,026.50 9$ 7,891,410.00 $ 77,660.10 78 2000 $ 857,260.00 $ 5,797.00 6$ 13,409,350.00 $ 134,639.00 62 1999 $ 1,519,800.00 $ 15,907.40 12$ 5,552,030.00 $ 60,126.55 75 1998 $ 777,920.00 $ 8,946.20 17$ 8,623,020.00 $ 92,060.43 94 1997 $ 1,183,270.00 $ 12,243.50 13$ 9,677,560.00 $ 82,285.25 84 1996 $ 584,102.00 $ 4,810.50 17$ 5,509,546.00 $ 40,917.03 93 1995 $ 301,105.00 $ 2,478.20 9$ 5,775,535.00 $ 42,230.60 94 1994 $ 552,420.00 $ 4,251.20 16$ 5,095,600.00 $ 35,847.22 102 1993 $ 591,695.00 $ 3,509.00 18$ 7,428,459.00 $ 35,432.75 113
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 18 of 93 Year to Date Statistics
Year to Date Building Statistics - January 1, 2005 - September 30, 2005
Yearly Number of Permits AREA A 20 AREA B 3 AREA C 43 AREA A AREA D 22% AREA D 26 28% AREA A AREA B AREA B 3% TOTAL: 92 AREA C AREA D AREA C 47%
Yearly Permit Values AREA A $ 1,643,008.00 AREA B $ 188,580.00 AREA A AREA C $ 4,252,610.00 AREA D 15% 23% AREA D $ 1,055,210.00 AREA A AREA B 3% AREA B TOTAL: $ 7,139,408.00 AREA C AREA C AREA D 59%
Yearly Permit Fees AREA A $16,466.10 AREA B $1,602.50 AREA C $39,634.93 AREA D 14% AREA A AREA D $9,310.00 25% AREA A TOTAL: $67,013.53 AREA B AREA C AREA B AREA D AREA C 2% 59%
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 19 of 93 Monthly Statistics
Monthly Building Statistics for September 2005
Monthly Number of Permits AREA A 7 AREA B 0 AREA C 4 AREA D AREA D 3 21% AREA A AREA A AREA B 50% TOTAL: 14 AREA C AREA C AREA D 29% AREA B 0%
Monthly Permit Values AREA C AREA A $ 220,250.00 23% AREA B $ - AREA B AREA D 0% AREA C $ 70,600.00 5% AREA D $ 14,600.00 AREA A AREA B TOTAL: $ 305,450.00 AREA C AREA A AREA D 72%
Monthly Permit Fees AREA A $ 1,452.00 AREA B $ - AREA D AREA C $ 631.50 1% AREA D $ 15.00 AREA C AREA A 30% 69% AREA A AREA B TOTAL: $ 2,098.50 AREA C AREA D AREA B 0%
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 20 of 93 Building Permit Application Summary Application # Legal Area Construction Date Details Lot 4, Plan 13941, DL 5637, LLD - 85 1081 Young Road, Gun Lake A Foundation 04/07/05 plan check Lot B, DL 164, Plan 19640, LLD - 7569 1082 Oberson Road C woodstove 05/07/05 issued That part of DL 2674 shown on Plan 1083 B15928 LLD C SFD - A 06/07/05 zone check That part of DL 2674 shown on Plan 1084 B15928 LLD C SFD - B 06/07/05 zone check That part of DL 2674 shown on Plan 1085 B15928 LLD C SFD - C 06/07/05 zone check That part of DL 2674 shown on Plan 1086 B15928 LLD C SFD - D 06/07/05 zone check That part of DL 2675 shown on Plan 1087 B12676 LLD C SFD - A 06/07/05 zone check That part of DL 2675 shown on Plan 1088 B12676 LLD C SFD - B 06/07/05 zone check That part of DL 2675 shown on Plan 1089 B12676 LLD C SFD - C 06/07/05 zone check That part of DL 2675 shown on Plan 1090 B12676 LLD C SFD - D 06/07/05 zone check Lot 36, Plan 14038, DL 2299, NWD - 1091 Garibaldi Park Road, Ring Creek D Foundation SFD 07/06/05 issued
1092 DL8011, LLD - Gun Lake Road A Garage 14/07/05 zone check DL 1897, NWD - 233 Minaty Lane, 1093 Britannia Beach D Garage 14/07/05 zone check DL 891, Plan 19960, NWD - 234 Upper 1094 Crescent,p D Renovation 14/07/05 zone checkg KAP74127, DL 1534, LLD - 8937 Old Plot Plan - In Zone/Plan 1095 Portage Road, Poole Creek C Addition 15/07/05 Files to be checked Lot 161, DL 4901, LLD - Lillooet Lake 1096 Estates C Woodstove 22/07/05 issued DL 8031, Except Plan H18072, LLD - 1097 11388 Gun Lake Road West A Deck Addition 27/07/05 zone check Plan 19960, DL 891, NWD - 131 1098 Creekside Road, Britannia Beach D Deck Addtion 29/06/05 zone check Lot 8, DL 1249, Plan 27927, LLD - 3092 1099 Sutherland Road C Renovation 08/08/05 issued Lot A, Plan 20157, DL 210, LLD - 1865 1100 Pem. Portage Road C Repair and Addition 08/08/05 issued Lot 74, DL 891, Plan 19960, NWD - 25 A 1101 Britannia Crescent, Britannia Beach D Addition 09/08/05 issued Lot A, DL 4823, Plan KAP 58098, LLD - 1102 228 Sunshine Dr. Gun Lake A Mobile Home 11/08/05 zone check Lot 52, Plan 883, DL 164, LLD - 1427 1103 Collins Road C DBL Car Garage 11/08/05 zone check Block 6, Plan 3825, DL 989, LLD - Dog 1104 Haven Lane, Upper Squamish Rd. D Garage 15/08/05 issued Lot 4, Plan 12062, DL 1094, LLD - 7753 1106 Pemberton Portage Road C Out Building 01/09/05 zone check Lot 1, DL 1094 & 955, Plan KAP50904, 1107 LLD - 7746 Pemberton Portage Road C Garage 02/09/05 zone check DL 1897, NWD - 233 Minaty Lane, 1108 Britannia Beach D Woodstove 07/09/05 issued Block B, DL 2656, LLD - 5745 Gun Lake 1109 Road A Mobile Home 07/09/05 issued Lot 5, DL 1659, Plan LMP24805, NWD - 1110 161 Furry Creek Drive D Deck 08/09/05 issued Lot B, Plan KAP74127, DL 1542, LLD - 1111 8961 Old Pemberton Portage Road C Addition 12/09/05 issued Lot 65, Plan VR559, DL 2668 & 5589, 1112 NWD - 65 Tusk Lane, Pinecrest D Garage Addition 13/09/05 zone check Lot 21, Plan 33675, DL 2679, LLD - 1838 1113 Reid Road C Renovation 13/09/05 issued Lot A, DL 164, Plan 22933, LLD - 1428 1114 Collins Road C woodstove 14/09/05 plan check Lot 29, Plan 33674, DL 2679, LLD - Reid 1115 Road, Ivey Lake C SFD 14/09/05 plan check Lot 45, Plan 33675, DL 4100, LLD - 1648 1116 Rodgers Road, Ivey Lake C Garage with Suite 14/09/05 awaiting information DL 588, LLD - 851 Chipmunk Place, 1117 Bralorne A Deck Addition 14/09/05 issued DL 897, LLD - 9835 Pioneer Rd., Gold 1118 Bridge A SFD 19/09/05 plan check Lot 2, Plan 16609, DL 4824, LLD - 64 Lee 1119 Road, Gun Lake C Garage 21/09/05 zone check Lot B, DL 171 & 2299, Plan B12676, LLD - 1120 Pemberton Meadows Road C SFD 21/09/05 awaiting plans Lot 2, DL 166, Plan 23735, LLD - #4 - 1121 7617 Pemberton Meadows Road C Woodstove 21/09/05 issued Lot 1, Plan KAP52349, DL 7450, LLD - 1122 9225 Pemberton Portage Road C Demolition 22/09/05 issued
1123 Pemberton Airport Road C Addition & Renovation 23/09/05 zone check DL 891, Plan 19960, NWD - 169 Copper 1124 Drive D Replacing Deck 23/09/05 issued Lot 2, DL 461 & 7488, Plan KAP52945, 1125 LLD - 755 Weaver Rd., Gun Lake A Woodstove 26/09/05 issued Lot 2, DL 461 & 7488, Plan KAP52945, 1126 LLD - 755 Weaver Rd., Gun Lake A Woodstove 26/09/05 issued Lot A, Plan 20993, DL 204, LLD - 1647 1127 Hwy. #99 C Garage 23/09/05 zone check Portion SL 8, DL 2248, NWD - Upper 1128 Squamish Valley D Garage 23/09/05 zone check Lot 12, Block 3, Plan LMP 11960, DL show home covenant to 1129 1296, NWD - Eagles Nest, Furry Creek D SFD 28/09/05 be enacted Lot 32, Plan 33675, DL 2679, LLD - Reid 1130 Road C Outbuilding 29/09/05 zone check Lot B, DL 6958, Gr 1, NWD - Lot B Tunnel 1131 Station D Renovation 30/09/05 zone check
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 21 of 93
Electoral Area Directors Committee To:
Susan Stratis, Planning Consultant From: Steven Olmstead, Manager of Planning and Development
REPORT September 29, 2005 Date:
Bylaw 948 - Rezoning Application for 1 Re: hectare lots – Raven’s Crest Developments,
Electoral Area C
Recommendation:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
1. THAT the Planning Department report on the Ravens Crest rezoning application be received for information;
2. THAT the referral responses from the Agricultural Land Commission, Ministry of Transportation, Pemberton Valley Trails Association, Vancouver Coastal Health Authority and Village of Pemberton be received;
3. THAT the applicants be requested to complete the following items prior to consideration of second reading and scheduling of a public hearing for zoning amendment bylaw No.948, 2005:
(1) Proof of adequate water supply (quantity and quality) to serve the proposed development through completion of a hydrology study and on-site testing by a qualified professional engineer to the written satisfaction of the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority; (2) Confirmation of adequate soils and slope conditions to permit on-site sewage disposal to the written satisfaction of the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority; (3) Proof of adequate access to the site through completion of an intersection design on Highway 99, to the satisfaction of the Ministry of Transportation; (4) Written support of access across the railway right-of-way from CN Rail; (5) Written support for the subdivision and access from the Agricultural Land Commission;
4. THAT staff process the ALR application concurrently with the above items.
Voting Rules Who Votes: All; Count: Directors; Decision: Majority
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 22 of 93 Administrator’s Comments:
Unavailable for comment.
Background:
The application for rezoning to the Rural Residential sub-zone to permit 50 1-hectare “estate” lots was re-submitted to the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District on March 16, 2004. The applicants are Senga Lindsay/Cam McIvor of Ravens Crest Development Inc. on behalf of the owners (Fotsch). This application involves the hillside, non-ALR portion of District Lot 211 (65.5 hectares of the total 116.15 hectare site). A staff report outlining several options for this application was reviewed by the Electoral Area Director’s Committee on May 9, 2005. The recommendation of the EAD Committee was endorsed by the Regional Board on May 19, 2005 as follows:
“THAT the application from Ravenscrest to rezone a portion of D.L. 211 from Rural 1 (RR1) to Rural Residential Sub-zone (RR1res) based on 1 hectare lots be supported and staff proceed with preparing requisite bylaws based on 1 hectare lots.”
The rezoning bylaw was prepared, and a staff report was received by the EAD Committee on June, 2005. The EAD Committee recommendation and the June 27, 2005 Board resolution was:
“THAT zoning amendment Bylaw No.948, 2005 be given first reading and referred to agencies for comment”.
The bylaw was referred to agencies on June 29, 2005.
Proposed Development
The north portion of DL 211 is proposed to be rezoned and subdivided into approximately 50 1-hectare lots as indicated on the attached plans. Lots are proposed to be serviced on-site with well water and septic fields. The application does not provide any detailed information regarding proven and approved water supply or sewage disposal systems, or slope/geotechnical conditions, issues which will require additional information as the rezoning application proceeds. The preliminary plan also does not indicate any proposed park or trail locations, which would also be a requirement at the time of subdivision.
Access is proposed from Highway 99, which requires a rail crossing at grade, Ministry of Transportation and ALC approval. Typically, MOT would require a minimum 20m road right to access the site, so some loss of ALR land would occur to accommodate subdivision access from Highway 99.
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 23 of 93 Existing Policy
The Area C Official Community Plan designates this property as Rural Residential (upper portion) and Agricultural (lower ALR portion). The current zoning of the property is Rural 1 (RR1) north of the CN right-of-way and Agricultural south of the CN right-of-way.
The Area C Official Community Plan allows for implementation of 1 hectare zoning on a site-specific basis in accordance with the following policies. Other rezonings to allow subdivision to 1 hectare lots have occurred under these policies (i.e. the “Biro” property and individual lots on Reid Road):
Policy 2.1: Existing small-lot residential land uses are recognized. Further development of residential lots smaller than 2 hectares may occur only when there is a proven and approved water supply and sewage disposal system.
Policy 2.4: To preserve the rural character of the area while recognizing the need to make efficient use of developable land, a 1 hectare minimum lot size is supported in areas designated Rural Residential. The 1 hectare minimum lot size will be implemented on a site specific basis on application by the property owner and be subject to conformance with suitability criteria such as soil conditions, slope, potential hazards, water supply, etc.
Regional Growth Strategy – Memorandum of Understanding
A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was endorsed by the Regional Board on July 25, 2005 to guide decision-making on key regional issues until the Regional Growth Strategy is adopted. The Land Use Principles of the MOU are relevant to the Ravenscrest application as follows:
i) Urban settlements should be located within existing Urban communities. Settlements outside existing urban communities should be considered where there is clear support for such development in adopted OCP’s. ii) Existing Non-Urban communities should retain their Non-Urban character. iv) Within existing communities, Smart Growth shall be practiced to conserve open space regionally addressing the need for sustainable land use that will protect the region’s natural environment and cultural heritage.
The Planning Department notes that the Ravenscrest proposal is not an Urban settlement. The proposed 1 hectare subdivision is consistent with the rural land use policies of the Area C OCP, and the proposal conforms to the intent of the MOU. However, it could be argued that a development of 50 lots does create a new settlement area that does not conform to Smart Growth principles of compact settlement. The proposal also does not conserve open space in its current form – an alternative development approach such as clustering of housing on less steep portions of the site would allow greater retention of open space.
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 24 of 93 Referral Agency Comments
The referral agency comments are attached to this report, and are summarized as follows:
Agricultural Land Commission (June 28, 2005) – The ALC response indicates that the Commission’s interests are directly affected by the proposed road access through the ALR. The letter indicates that while the Commission does not object to the holding of a public hearing on the proposal, an ALR application must be submitted and the Commission must rule on the application before the bylaw receives further readings (or is adopted). The ALC also notes potential conflicts between farm activities and residential use may require special “edge planning” techniques and a covenant registered on title of new properties regarding the rights of farm activities. The letter further notes the need for more coordinated planning of non-ALR land, both to minimize impacts on farming, and to ensure that low-density residential development does not preclude more intensive use of these lands.
Planning Comments: The applicants did initiate an ALR application on December 2004, at the time the previous rezoning application (to 250 units) was under consideration. The Planning Department did not process that application, as staff were awaiting direction from the Board and Village of Pemberton regarding servicing and other issues. The applicants will be requested to update the ALR application to reflect the new 1-hectare proposal, and to provide more specific information related to the proposed road access. With respect to coordinated planning of the non-ALR lands, this issue will be an important consideration in the Area C OCP review.
Ministry of Transportation (August 22, 2005) – The Ministry concurs with the previous SLRD planning recommendation that detailed geotechnical assessment and hydro geological study be completed to prove the viability of the subdivision prior to public hearing. MOT also notes that a detailed intersection design is required to demonstrate that an intersection, with left turn lanes and deceleration/acceleration lanes can be constructed.
Planning Comments: The letter is not specific whether the intersection design is needed prior to rezoning, and confirmation on this point will be sought from the Ministry. Discussions with Ministry staff indicated concerns that the road geometry will not allow adequate site distances for an intersection, and access from the west (Pemberton Farm Road) may be needed, rather than access from Highway 99,
Vancouver Coastal Health Authority – the letter dated July 5, 2005 from Coast Garibaldi Health Services indicates the agency does not support the proposed use of the property, based on information provided to date. The VCHA letter notes concerns with groundwater sources and recommends that a groundwater supply/hydro geological study be conducted to address water quantity, water quality, and potential cumulative impacts on of-site sewage disposal systems on water supply sources. The letter further notes that the steep slopes and soil conditions may not be suitable for on-site sewage disposal, and that the VCHA Subdivision Standard does not recommend on-site disposal on slopes over 30%.
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 25 of 93 Planning Comments: These are significant concerns, and both the water supply/quality and on-site sewage disposal should be proven prior to public hearing, consistent with OCP policy 2.1.
Village of Pemberton, August 10, 2005 – The Village of Pemberton Council received a report from the Village Planner at the Regular Council Meeting on August 9, 2005. The letter dated August 10, 2005 contains four recommendations made by the Council, that (1) the proposed subdivision should take into account future long term land use, road network and infrastructure requirements; (2) the proposal should be assessed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding for the Regional Growth Strategy; (3) the technical issues listed in the SLRD staff report should be addressed prior to public hearing, and (4) the Village should be included in discussions with the SLRD and applicant regarding future land use and servicing.
Planning Comments: The need to allow for more intensive use in the long term was recommended by the SLRD in the May EAD report, and staff agree with that concern. The Village will be included in future discussions on servicing and land use.
Pemberton Valley Trails Association (email dated July 6, 2005) – A referral was sent to the PVTA to obtain input on trail use and potential future trail dedications on the site. The referral response indicates the need to initiate a Trails Master Plan to review trail corridors in the rural Pemberton Area, including private, Crown and Lil’wat Nation lands.
Planning Comments: No program is currently in place to review trail options in rural Pemberton. The Sea-to Sky Trail Master Plan will not be dealing with specific issues related to trails and park dedications in this area. It is recommended that this issue be included as part of the Area C OCP review.
B.C. Parks (Ministry of Environment) – BC Parks indicated “No comment” by email response on June 30, 2005.
Summary
The following key issues have been raised in previous planning reports, and require detailed assessment and resolution before Bylaw 948 proceeds to public hearing or further readings. The Area C Official Community Plan also requires that specific information be provided on soil conditions, slope, potential hazards, water supply, and sewage disposal prior to rezoning properties to the 1 hectare lot size. Minimal information has been provided on these technical aspects to date. The referral agency comments have also confirmed that detailed work on these issues must be completed before the bylaw can be supported. The outstanding issues are:
(a) Access – Subdivision of this property will require dedication of an access road to Highway 99, and approval from the Ministry of Transportation and the Agricultural Land Commission. A rail crossing will also require approval from CN Rail. The subdivision should also be required to provide for future connection to the west.
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 26 of 93 (b) Impacts on ALR land – The Agricultural Advisory Committee reviewed the previous application for more intensive residential use of this site, and supported the proposal subject to a number of recommendations to mitigate impacts on the agricultural land on the lower part of the site. The proposed subdivision, including 20m access road, will require approval from the Agricultural Land Commission.
(c) Rail Crossing – CN Rail will be requested to comment on the bylaw to determine their requirements for a future rail crossing to access the upper portion of the site.
(d) Water Supply – No information has been submitted by the applicants regarding water supply except to note that properties will be serviced with individual wells. It is unknown whether adequate water supply and water quality exists in this upper area to support the 50 lot subdivision. In the nearby Ivey Lake/Reid Road area, water supply has become a significant concern, and the regional board passed a resolution on September 27, 2004 to defer the processing of rezoning applications in that area until a groundwater supply study was completed.
(e) Slope conditions (soil stability, hazard) – No information has been submitted on the slope and soil conditions, or potential hazards associated with the development as per OCP policy. The site consists of relatively steep slopes ranging, with an average of 30% as indicated in the submission. A detailed geotechnical assessment will be required to assess the on-site conditions and proposed road grades and construction methods.
(f) Sewage disposal – The applicants have indicated that sewage disposal will be managed through on-site septic disposal. As noted in the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority comments, the steep slopes of this site and associated soil conditions may not support on-site septic disposal. Confirmation of sewage disposal conditions is required.
(g) Park dedication and trail linkages – No information has been provided regarding the minimum 5% park dedication required at the time of subdivision, or on trail/right-of- way dedications to ensure continuation of current bike trails through the area.
Recommendations
It is recommended that the applicants complete the necessary studies to address the preceding issues, and that a follow up report be brought to the EAD committee once this work is complete, and referral agencies are generally supportive of the proposed development. At that time, a recommendation for second reading of the bylaw and public hearing will be made.
Respectfully submitted,
______Susan Stratis Steven Olmstead, Planning Consultant Manager, Planning and Development
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 27 of 93 Referral Response – Agricultural Land Commission
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 28 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 29 of 93
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 30 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 31 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 32 of 93 SQUAMISH-LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT
BY-LAW NO. 948-2005
A by-law of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District to amend Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002
The Board of Directors of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows:
1. This by-law may be cited for all purposes as the "Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment By-law No. 948-2005".
2. The Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, is hereby amended as follows:
(a) That the Official Zoning Map, Schedule B, Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002 is hereby amended by:
(i) rezoning the easterly 310 acres more or less of District Lot 211 Lillooet district except Plans 9479, A21 and 39509, Lillooet District as outlined on Schedule A, which is attached to and forms part of this bylaw, from Rural 1 (RR1) zone to Rural 1 - Rural Residential sub- zone.
READ A FIRST TIME this 27th day of June 2005.
READ A SECOND TIME this day of 2005
PUBLIC HEARING held on the day of 2005.
READ A THIRD TIME this day of 2005.
APPROVED pursuant to Sec.54(2) of the Highway Act this day of 2005
ADOPTED this day of 2005.
John Turner Paul R. Edgington Chair Secretary
I hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and correct copy of By-law No. 948 cited as “Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment By-law No. 948-2005” as read a first time June 27, 2005.
Allison Macdonald Deputy Secretary
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 33 of 93
SCHEDULE A TO BYLAW 948
Note: Northern portion of D.L. 211 only proposed for rezoning
FROM: Rural 1 Chair TO: Rural 1 – Rural Residential sub-zone (RR1-RES) ______Secretary
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 34 of 93
March 16, 2005
Mr. Steve Olmstead Squamish-Lillooet Regional District P.O. Box 219 Pemberton, B.C. V0N 2L0
Delivered by hand
Re: Raven’s Crest Developments Inc. Application for Rezoning D.L. 211, Lillooet District, except plans 9479, A21and 39509
Enclosed please find a completed application to amend Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002 to permit a proposed residential development for lands within Electoral C. This application
APPLICATION FOR REZONING
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Parcel Identifier: 010-309-306
The Easterly 310 Acres more or less of District Lot 211 Lillooet District Except Plans 9479, A21 and 39509
The rezoning application only considers the lands north of the CN right of way.
ZONING AMENDMENT REQUESTED
Rezone from the RR1 and RR1 Residential zoning
The subject lands are currently regulated by the RR1 (Rural One) zoning regulations and it is requested that the zoning map be amended to designate the lands north of the CN right of way RR1 Residential. The revised zoning would permit a minimum lot area of 1.0 hectare for single family dwellings.
Development Permit Area Designation Required
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 35 of 93
REZONING INFORMATION
APPLICANT
Ravens Crest Development Inc. P.O. Box 494 Pemberton, B.C. V0N 2L0
604-894-5008 [email protected]
APPLICANT’S AGENT
SLA Inc. Senga Lindsay 4866 Montebello Pl. Whistler, B.C. V0N 1B4
604-948-1083 [email protected]
REGISTERED OWNER
Rusty Rainer Jacob Fotsch Box 5400 Squamish B.C, V0N 3G0
250-564-0490
Klaus Fotsch Box 283 Pemberton, B.C.
Aaron Albert Fotsch 2380 Ospika Blvd. Prince George, B.C. V2N 3N5
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 36 of 93
SUBJECT SITE
A. GENERAL
Location (general description):
The lands subject to this rezoning application identified in Appendix A – Location Plan, are situated approximately 3 kilometers east of the Village of Pemberton and approximately 1.5 kilometers west of Mount Currie.
The lands have an 800 metre frontage along Highway 99 and are bisected (north to south) by a CN Rail right of way. The lands offer both valley bottom lands and rocky hillside slopes. The lands north of the railway are not within the floodplain, although there are limited areas south of the tracks within the flood plain (primarily the low-lying agricultural areas).
The property rises approximately 265 metres from the valley bottom, with average slopes at 30% varying from bluffy terrain to rock bluffs. The upper lands offer mature forest dominated by Douglas fir and understory, while the lower slopes contain immature second growth forest. There are no streams or waterbodies identified in the study area, although the upper Ivey Lake outlet creek flows to the west of the property while an unnamed creek flows to the east.
Size of Entire Property (acres/hectares)
The entire property comprises approximately 287 acres or 116.15 hectares, however this rezoning application considers only the northern half of the property (as bisected by the CNR line). The northern portion of the property comprises 161.7 acres or 65.5 hectares.
Description of Existing Use
There is currently no formal use on the northern lands; except for unauthorized recreational mountain biking that has become an extension to the Mosquito Lake trail system.
Proposed Use
The development program proposes 50 lots with an area of at least 1.0 hectare. The Subdivision Plan is attached as Appendix A.
The residential development north of the CNR line will include estate lots .The following provides a detailed overview of the development:
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 37 of 93
LAND USE NUMBER GROSS GROSS NET AREA NET MINIMUM MAXIMUM OF LOTS AREA DENSITY DENSITY PARCEL PARCEL AREA AREA
ESTATE 50 65.1 ha 0.77-lots/ha 59.0-ha 0.85-lots/ha 1.0 ha 2.2 ha LOT
Approximate Commencement Date
If it is determined by the SLRD that the lands will not be considered as part of a future extension of the Village of Pemberton’s boundaries (through the proposed Boundary Expansion Study and OCP Review), it is anticipated that the approximate commencement date for construction of the residential subdivision would be late fall 2005 or spring of 2006.
B. SEWAGE DISPOSAL AND WATER SUPPLY
Individual wells and septic fields are proposed on each parcel for water supply and sewage disposal. The storm drainage system will consist of roadside ditches and culverts. Ditches will be lined with rip- rap where required to prevent erosion. There are no water courses on site that have to be accommodated. Poles and overhead wires will provide power and telephone services. No streetlights are proposed. No propane or natural gas service is proposed.
C. ROADS AND ACCESS
Roads will conform to Ministry of Transportation standards for subdivisions. A 7-m paved width with 0.5-m wide gravel shoulders will be provided. The SLRD has indicated that they prefer access to the site to be north of the railway, through the adjacent property. Since that property has not yet been subdivided, and no road right-of-ways exist at this time, the access to the site will need to be from Highway 99. Provision will be made for future road connection to lands beyond the site. North of the railway, road grades will generally be kept under 10%. Further discussions with CN Rail will be necessary to verify the grade crossing.
D. OTHER SERVICING ISSUES
Hazard Rating
Preliminary investigations indicated that it does not appear that there are any severe rock-fall hazards associated with the site. The geotechnical investigation to be undertaken during design will identify any localized or overall hazards
Fire and Emergency Services
There will not be any water system at the proposed development sufficient for fire protection purposes.
E. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
A Preliminary Environmental Review (PER) and archeological investigations for the subject lands have been initiated.
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 38 of 93
JUSTIFICATION
REASON AND COMMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE REZONING APPLICATION
Background
In June 2004 Raven’s Crest Developments submitted a request for rezoning of the subject property from RR1 to R1 to permit 50 estate lots. This rezoning application was subsequently withdrawn following a meeting with SLRD staff, as they indicated a desire to increase the residential density on the lands given its proximity to Pemberton and the potential for connection to an approved water and sewage disposal system.
In the Fall of 2004 Raven’s Crest Developments submitted a formal application for a mixed use residential development 347 residential units consisting of 51 estate lots, 82 single-family lots and 214 multifamily units. The application also proposed the dedication of funds and/or a 32 acre parcel of land for recreational facilities to service the Pemberton Valley. This application was put on hold by the Regional District early in 2005 pending the review of their Official Community Plan. The Village of Pemberton also deferred consideration of the application pending their Boundary Expansion study.
Raven’s Crest Developments to date have expended considerable management and consulting fees in an effort to address issues raised by the SLRD Board. And although the proponent acknowledges that the Board was not comfortable in further considering the application until they have completed their OCP review and the Village has completed their boundary expansion study, this situation has resulted in a “rock and a hard place” for the proponent. Staff have indicated that they believe that the lands are not appropriate for large lot single family development at this time while the Board has indicated that they will not support increased density without further study and public consultation. Ravens Crest can not move forward with some certainty of the minimum value of the lands, whether it be in its current state, as 1 hectare lots (since this was previously approved on the adjacent property) or as a mixed residential development that was previously proposed.
Raven’s Crest Developments is therefore submitting this application to establish the highest and best density for the lands at this time. The rural residential (1 hectare lot) zoning has the ability to provide some certainty for the proponent, and allow the possibility of the mixed density development to effectively be put in a holding zone (rather than permanently withdrawn) pending the results of the OCP Review and Boundary Expansion Study. If the SLRD and Village initiatives indicate: 1. That the lands are inappropriate for more intensive development, then the proponent will not have lost 6-8 months but rather could proceed immediately with developing the 1 hectare lot subdivision. 2. That the land is appropriate for more intensive development, then the mixed density development together with the proposed $2.1 million contribution and/or 32 acre land dedication can be reintroduced into the municipal review process.
General OCP Policy Review
The proposed development falls within the Electoral Area C Official Community Plan and more specifically “The Pemberton Fringe”. The OCP describes the area as follows: “Whether on farms, large lots subdivisions, or in small communities, the landscape is predominantly one of rural character. Yet in spite of the area’s rural character, or perhaps because of it, there is pressure for development, particularly residential development. This is illustrated by recent large lot subdivisions and by residential construction on farmland. Clearly the natural beauty and rural character of the Plan Area has created significant development pressure. The challenge lies in creating appropriate development locations that avoid the natural hazards and jurisdictional restrictions (Agricultural Land Reserves, Indian Reserves, and Crown Land) that are found throughout the Plan Area and the rest of the Province of BC.”
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 39 of 93
Further the Plan Objectives indicates “the need to strike a balance between rural preservation and development to accommodate some population growth”.
Rural Residential Policy Review
The proposed subdivision is consistent with subdivisions such as Owl Ridge, Ivey Lake and Walkerville as well as the approval of the rural residential zoning on lands immediately adjacent to this property. The Plan states that “Rural residential in the Mount Currie/D’Arcy corridor … may provide some potential for additional residential development while maintaining an overall rural character for the area. Rural residential in this corridor could provide development which: • Is within reasonable proximity to urban amenities • Offers rural lifestyle choice • Supports a more viable commercial area in Mount Currie • Is outside the Lillooet River floodplain • Is outside the Agricultural Land Reserve”
The residential development is proposed partially on land that has been previously logged and is also not designated in the ALR (except for the access road widening). The increased residential will complement the Mount Currie commercial area while proposed home construction will further enhance local job opportunities and the local economy (spin-offs).
Site Specific Development Rationale
The following provides the rationale for the site specific development, considering density and land use issues.
Density and Housing Supply – The proposed development plan balances the environmental and physical capacity of the lands together with building housing capacity in the region.
Environmental Protection – In addition to the site plan design, and the trail and park dedications, additional investigations with the environmental consulting team will ensure that any features of importance will be retained (both site servicing and house construction will attempt to preserve tree stands and other natural features) . This includes habitat areas and view corridors. The site is not encumbered by riparian constraints, making this a more favourable development site. The developer will work with the SLRD and other interests to ensure minimal environmental impacts during construction.
Environmental Sustainability – The proposed development offers south facing slopes that provide passive solar heating. Additional sustainable design and green building initiatives will be incorporated into design guidelines.
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 40 of 93
To: Electoral Area Director’s Committee
From: Lisa Griffith, Community Planner
Date: September 29, 2005 REPORT Re: Application for Subdivision in the ALR John & Kathy Barr – Electoral Area C
Recommendation:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT the Regional District forward the application for a subdivision within the ALR of that part of D.L. 170, 1538 and 5673, shown on Plan B 5182, Lillooet Land District to the Agricultural Land Commission with the following comment:
1. The SLRD recommends approval of this application.
Administrator’s Comments: Not available for comment.
Purpose:
To provide comments to the Agricultural Land Commission regarding the application for subdivision (boundary adjustment) to create two lots within the ALR.
Background:
The subject property is located at 9216 Pemberton Meadows Road, a few km before the turn-off to the Lillooet River FSR. The applicants have applied for a subdivision (boundary adjustment) in the ALR to consolidate six existing holdings into two lots. It is the applicants’ intention to consolidate all holdings on the west side of Pemberton Meadows Road into Lot A measuring 30.0 ha, and amalgamate all holdings on the east side of the road into Lot B measuring 9.79 ha. Three of the original lots are 15 m wide, thinly shaped lots that run the length of the southern boundary of the subject property.
The subject property is designated Agriculture in the Electoral Area C Official Community Plan and zoned Agriculture (AGR) under Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw 765, 2002. The OCP generally does not support subdivision of ALR land (Policy 1.3), although the plan states “All uses and subdivision of land within the Agricultural Land Reserve shall be in accordance with
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 41 of 93 the ALC Act” (Policy 1.2). Thus, if a subdivision is approved by the Agricultural Land Commission, it would be considered consistent with the OCP.
Land use in the vicinity of the subject property is characterized by active agricultural operations (hay, pasture, potatoes, and grazing to the north and south) and the Lillooet River to the east, and steep mountain grades to the west. Both proposed lots are well above the minimum parcel size of 2 ha permitted in the AGR Zone.
The SLRD Agricultural Advisory Committee members were forwarded a copy of the application for preliminary review and comment, and no objections have been received to date.
Planning staff believe there is a strong reason to support the subdivision (boundary adjustment) in the ALR as it will result in a more efficient configuration which lends itself well for farm operations. A copy of the AAC comments, along with a staff recommendation, will be forwarded to the ALC once the Regional Board has had the opportunity to consider this application.
Respectfully submitted,
Lisa Griffith, Community Planner
Attachments: -Maps, application form
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 42 of 93 Location Map
R S F
r e v i R
t e o o l l i L
Subject Property: 9216 Pemberton Meadows Rd
Dill Rd
Rd Lois
P e m b e r to n M e a d o w s R d
d
R
n
o
s
l
i
W
Legend
0 315 630 1,260 Meters Cadastral-Legals SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 1 centimeter equals 172 meters Page 43 of 93 SLRD-ROADS-06-07-04 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 44 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 45 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 46 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 47 of 93
To: Electoral Area Directors Committee
From: Janette Leung, Planner
REPORT Date: September 7, 2005
Re: Development Variance Permit #053 for District Lot 8011, Lillooet District Except Plan KAP 72883, Electoral Area ‘A’.
Recommendation:
That it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT Development Variance Permit #053 to increase the permitted height of an accessory building under section 9.2 of Zoning Bylaw No. 670 from 4.00 m (13.12 ft) to 5.30 m (21.50 ft) on DL 8011, Except Plan KAP 72883 (2585 Lakeview Road, Gun Lake, Electoral Area ‘A’), be issued.
Administrator’s Comments: Unavailable for comment
Purpose:
To vary the height requirement for accessory buildings from a maximum of 4.00 m (13.12 ft) to 5.30 m (17.39 ft) to allow for the construction of a garage.
Background:
The applicants wish to build a new log storage garage on the lot for the purpose of storing their travel trailer which is 3.40 m high (or 11.17 ft). The length and width of the garage will be 6.07 m (20.00 ft) by 12.19 m (40.00 ft). This results in a building coverage well below the 33% maximum as required by the zoning by-law. The garage will include one 4.27 m (14.00 ft) by 3.51 m (11.50 ft) overhead door, and the applicant is requesting headroom of 0.45 m (1.50) ft. The remaining height allowance for the roof which will be approximately 1.30 m (or 4.27 ft). (See Appendix ‘A’)
The lot is zoned Residential 2 (R2) under Zoning Bylaw 670 and is located adjacent to Gun Lake on the northwest side. A surveyed lot is adjacent on the east side and the remaining two sides are unsurveyed Crown lands. Lakeview Road is the closest road and is accessible by a driveway (See Appendix ‘B’).
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 1 Page 48 of 93
The proposed garage is well within the required minimum setbacks for an accessory building. The required setbacks on the property are a minimum of 7.50 m (24.61 ft) from the front parcel line, 3.00 m (9.82 ft) from the rear parcel line, 1.50 m (4.92 ft) from the interior side parcel lines, and a minimum of 7.5 m (24.61 ft) from Gun Lake’s boundary. The proposed setbacks, as shown on the attached sketch plan and shown in Appendix ‘C’ are: 27 m (88.58 ft) and 65 m (213.25 ft) on the two sides, 50 m (164.04 ft) from Gun Lake, and 37 m (121.39 ft) from the south from Crown Land. Thus there should be no impact on views from adjacent lands due to the height increase requested.
Adjacent Neighbours Comments:
Letters of notification were sent to adjacent neighbours. William B. Calbick, Marilyn A. Hampton, and Robert G. Calbick, have jointly submitted a letter to staff indicating they have reviewed the plans for the storage garage and have no objection to the height variance. In addition, there were no negative comments submitted to SLRD staff.
Submitted by:
Janette Leung Planner
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 2 Page 49 of 93
SQUAMISH-LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT Development Variance Permit # 53
File No. 3090 20 053
Issued to: Michael and Grace Longley
(Registered owners according to Land Title Office, hereinafter referred to as the Permittee)
Address: 1325 Lynnwood Lane Omaha, Nebraska USA 68152
1) This Development Variance permit is issued subject to compliance with all of the By-laws of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District applicable thereto, except as specifically varied or supplemented by this permit.
2) This Development Variance Permit applies to and only to those lands within the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District described below, and any and all buildings, structure and other development thereon:
Parcel Identifier: 013-496-972 Legal Description: DL 8011 LLD Except Plan KAP 72883 Civic Address: 2585 Lakeview Road, Gun Lake, BC
3) The maximum allowable height for an accessory building in the Residential Zone II (R2), Section 9.2 of Bylaw 670 is varied as follows:
Increase the height provision for an accessory building from 4.0 m (13.12 ft) to 5.3 m (17.39 ft), only as identified on the site plan shown on Appendix 1 which is attached to and forms a part of this permit.
4) The following conditions and requirements are imposed:
None
5) This Permit shall not have the effect of varying the use or density of the Land specified in Zoning By-law No. 670, or a flood plain specification under s. 910 of the Local Government Act.
6) This Permit prevails over the provisions of the By-law in the event of conflict.
7) Security Requirements: No
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 50 of 93
8) The land described herein shall be developed strictly in accordance with the terms and conditions and provisions of this permit and any plans and specifications attached to this permit shall form a part hereof.
9) This permit is not a building permit.
10) Notice of this Permit shall be filed in the Land Title Office at Kamloops under Section 927 of the Local Government Act, and upon such filing, the terms of this Permit or any amendment hereto shall be binding upon all persons who acquire an interest in the land affected by the Permit.
AUTHORIZED BY RESOLUTION PASSED BY THE REGIONAL BOARD THE DAY OF , 2005.
______John Turner Paul R. Edgington Chair Administrator
END OF DOCUMENT
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 51 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 52 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 53 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 54 of 93
To: Electoral Area Directors Committee
From: Janette Leung, Planner
REPORT Date: September 26, 2005
Re: Temporary Commercial use Permit Authorization By-law No. 965-2005 (Backcountry Snowcats Ltd. – Reg and Kathy Milne)
Recommendation:
THAT Bylaw 965-2005 cited as “Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Temporary Use Permit Authorization Bylaw No. 965-2005 be read a first time and referred to provincial agencies and First Nations for comment.
Voting Rules
Who Votes: All; Count: Directors; Decision: Majority
Administrator’s Comments: Unavailable for comment
Background:
Backcountry Snowcats Ltd is applying for two-year temporary commercial use permit for the purpose of improving their operation of recreational services in the region. They have located a one acre parcel near Hope Creek Forest Service Road (FSR), 10 km south of Hurley Road FSR, and east of Grouty Peak (See location map Appendix ‘A’). This will be used for accommodating tourists overnight for the purpose of skiing on Grouty Peak during the day. A helicopter landing area is also applied for under this permit application. The applicant currently holds tenure rights with Land Water British Columbia (LWBC) (See tenures map Appendix ‘B’). If successful, the applicants plan to apply to the SLRD for rezoning of the site after the temporary use permit expires.
Regional District Bylaws:
The site is zoned Rural 1 Resource Management subzone (RR1RM) in SLRD’s Zoning bylaw 765-2002 for Electoral Area ‘C’. Under S.5.2 (d), motorized open land
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 55 of 93 commercial recreation is allowed, but a permit is required for structures (tourist/commercial trailers), as well as for aircraft landing facilities. Campgrounds are also allowed on the site up to a maximum number of 20 vehicles. Given that the applicant has chosen to use up to two (2) large trailers with a capacity of accommodating 24 persons, campground provisions may need to be referred to in the permit.
As it is on Crown Land, SLRD staff should consult with agencies and provincial ministries involved, including LWBC, Ministry of Forests, Ministry of Transportation, Department of Fisheries, etc., as per proper procedure.
Planning Department Comments:
Site specific issues including water, waste, and septic services appear to be planned for sufficiently though the applicant’s corporate plan, “Backcountry Snowcats Ltd: Management Plan for Commercial Recreation License in the Hurley River Drainage – Grouty Peak”. As the area is relatively isolated, potential noise complaints are not expected to be an issue. Staff accommodations will be on site.
However, there are other concerns including: public access on forest lands, impact on wildlife habitat, aboriginal interests, and mining claims (this being minimal in impact). Specifically, grizzly bears, mountain goat, and owls have habitats areas situated nearby. Wild animal habitat conflicts with tourist use; as well, helicopter noises may become issues requiring greater address. The Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management’s Lillooet LRMP applies to the area. Their policy supports a variety of wide range of high quality, well-managed, ecologically sustainable recreation and tourist activities.
Staff recommends that early consultation be initiated with the aforementioned authorities, and that coordination and communication be continuous throughout the process to ensure all concerns are dealt with on Crown Land. Standard public notification procedures for issuing a TUP will be required.
Respectfully submitted,
Janette Leung, Planner Encl.
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 56 of 93
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT TP NO. 6
ISSUED TO: Reg and Kathy Milne Backcountry Snowcats Ltd. 9615 Emerald Place Whistler, BC V0M 1B9
For authorized use by: Backcountry Snowcats Ltd. 9615 Emerald Place Whistler, BC V0M 1B9
1. This Temporary Use Permit is issued subject to compliance with all of the Bylaws of the Squamish - Lillooet Regional District applicable thereto, except those specifically varied or supplemented by this Permit.
2. This Temporary Use Permit applies to those "lands" within the Squamish - Lillooet Regional District described below and any and all buildings, structures and other development thereon:
(a) One acre square parcel at the approximate location of Hope Creek Forest Service Road (FSR), approximately 10km S of Hurley River FSR junction (east side of Grouty Mountain, as shown on maps attached hereto as Schedules "A”).
3. In addition to the existing provisions of Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Zoning Bylaw No. 765-2002 (or any bylaw replacing Bylaw No. 765-2002) the following uses are permitted:
(a) staging area for commercial ‘helicopter’ operations including helicopter landing area, fuel storage, and vehicle parking; (b) up to two tourist accommodation trailers with a maximum capacity of 24 campers; (c) parking for up to two snowcat vehicles.
4. Uses permitted under section 3(a) of this permit shall be subject to the following conditions: (a) The staging area shall only be used during the helicopter skiing operating season, November to March; (b) The model of helicopter used from this staging area shall only be an ‘A- star”, or similar medium-sized’ (5 passenger or less) model; (c) Fuel storage for the helicopter is not allowed on the site.
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 57 of 93
5. Uses permitted under section 3(c) of this permit shall be subject to the following conditions:
(a) Fuel storage for snowcats are allowed but must be stored in a double wall tank.
6. As a condition of the issuance of this Temporary Commercial Use Permit, the Regional District is holding security set out below to ensure that development is carried out in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Permit. Should any interest be earned upon the security, it shall accrue to the Permittee and be paid to the Permittee if the security is returned. The condition of posting of the security is that should the Permittee fail to carry out development hereby authorized according to the terms and conditions of this Temporary Commercial Use Permit, the Regional District may use the security to carry out the development permitted by this Temporary Commercial Use Permit. There is filed accordingly:
a) An Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $10,000.00.
7. The land described herein shall be developed in strict accordance with the terms and conditions and provisions of this Temporary Commercial Use Permit.
8. This Temporary Use Permit expires on , 2007.
9. Any application to amend this Temporary Commercial Use Permit shall be considered a new application.
10. This Temporary Commercial Use Permit is not a building permit.
AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION PASSED BY THE BOARD
THIS DAY OF , 2005
ISSUED THIS DAY OF , 2005.
Paul.R. Edgington Secretary
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 58 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 59 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 60 of 93
To: Electoral Area Director’s Committee
From: Janette Leung, Planner
REPORT Date: September 26, 2005
Re: Rezoning Application: Lot 15, DL 165, Plan 883, Lillooet Land District, Arthur Moody (aka. Jade Investment Ltd.)
Recommendation:
THAT Bylaw 964 cited as, “Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 964-2005,” be introduced and read a first time, and referred to affected provincial agencies and the Area C Agricultural Advisory Committee for comment.
Administrator’s Comments: Unavailable for comment
Purpose:
To inform the EAD and Board of a rezoning application and an application for a non-farm use in the Agricultural Land Reserve to allow for a group daycare/ preschool on a property in the Pemberton Fringe.
Background:
The subject property is 6.68 acres, located at 1537 Fraser Road and entirely in the ALR. Sea to Sky Community Services Society have submitted an application on behalf of the owners, Ilse Morris, John Hall and Arthur Murray, to rezone the property to allow for a group day-care facility for toddlers and preschoolers, a pre-school and an early childhood development office.
The property is designated Agriculture in the Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 689, 1999 and is zoned Agriculture-Pemberton Fringe (AGR PF) sub-zone in the Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002. Presently, the owners may use the property for a day care for up to than 8 children as permitted in Section 4.2 of the Area C Zoning Bylaw. However, the applicants have informed staff they wish to renovate the existing house (see plans in Appendix ‘A’) so it is suitable for a daycare and can be licensed under Coast Garibaldi Health Authority’s Child Care Licensing Regulations. The daycare will be enrolling and providing services for a maximum of 44 children: 16 day care spaces, 8 toddlers, and 20 preschool children (three mornings a week).
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 61 of 93 The anticipated hours would be Monday to Friday, 7:00am to 6:00pm, with no use in the evenings or weekends.
The applicants have submitted the attached site plan (see Appendix ‘B’) for the day care and have indicated they intend to have a fenced playground in the backyard. The current use of the property is residential, and has been a rental home. The applicants have advised that minor renovations to the rental are currently needed, and if the proposed use is approved, all renovations will be completed and the outside of the house will be cleaned and repaired as needed which will enhance the property. The proposed method of sewage disposal will be septic tank and field and the method of water supply will be from a well. Adjacent uses include residential and business, such as bed and breakfast, horse stables, and other minor agricultural uses.
In addition to the rezoning application, the applicants have also submitted an application pursuant to the Agricultural Land Commission Act for a non-farm use in the ALR.
Planning Department Comments:
It is anticipated that noise and traffic will increase in the area due to the increase in day care service. Therefore, adjacent neighbors’ concerns need be addressed, especially during the public hearing. Fraser Road, which is immediately adjacent, is usually a quiet road. The expected users of the road, besides pedestrians are cars, horse trailers, and trucks.
There has been a recognized need for additional licensed day care in the Pemberton Valley and given the poor condition of the existing day care in the old Pemberton High School. The proposal does not involve the construction of any new buildings. All of the proposed renovations are to be contained within the footprint of existing building. In regards to parking, there are spaces for three cars, but more can be accommodated on the site. The proposed scope of the facility is very significantly larger than presently exists and can be anticipated to be of concern in the neighbourhood.
Planning staff recommend that his application be referred to affected provincial agencies, including the Agricultural Land Commission and the Area C Agricultural Advisory Committee (AAC) for comment. A draft bylaw for this application is attached.
Respectfully submitted,
Janette Leung, Planner
Encl.
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 62 of 93 SQUAMISH-LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT
BY-LAW NO. 964-2005
SLRD Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment By-law No. 964, 2005
The Board of Directors of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows:
1. This by-law may be cited for all purposes as the "SLRD Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment By-law No. 964-2005".
2. The Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Zoning By-law No. 765-2002, is hereby amended as follows:
a) Amend the Agriculture – Pemberton Fringe sub-zone section 6.4, Site Specific Uses, by inserting immediately following clause (4), the following:
(5) In addition to uses permitted in section 6.1, a licensed children’s day- care facility for a maximum of 44 children at peak hours is a permitted use on Lot 15, District Lot 165, Lillooet District, Plan 883.
READ A FIRST TIME this day of , 2005.
READ A SECOND TIME this day of , 2005.
A PUBLIC HEARING WAS HELD, pursuant to Sec 890 of the Local Government Act, on the day of , 2005.
READ A THIRD TIME this day of , 2005.
APPROVED pursuant to Sec.54(2) of the Highway Act this day of , 2005.
APPROVED BY THE MINISTER OF COMMUNITY SERVICES this day of , 2005.
APPROVAL NO.
ADOPTED this day of , 2005.
John Turner Paul R. Edgington Chair Administrator
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 63 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 64 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 65 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 66 of 93
To: Electoral Area Directors Committee
From: Janette Leung, Planner
REPORT Date: September 28, 2005
Re: Temporary Use Permit # 5 Renewal – Doug O’Mara, Whistler-Heli Skiing
Recommendation:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT Temporary Use Permit #5 for Whister-Heli Skiing be renewed for a period of one year until January 24, 2007.
AND THAT the security provided in conjunction with Temporary Use Permit #5 be extended for a further year in conjunction with the permit renewal.
Administrator’s Comments: Unavailable for comment
Purpose: To consider renewal of TUP #5 for Whistler-Heli Skiing
Background:
A temporary use permit (Appendix ‘A’) was issued to Whistler-Heli Skiing to create a staging area for their helicopter, including storage, fuel storage, and vehicle parking area. Attached is a copy of a letter from Whistler-Heli Skiing requesting renewal of the permit for one year (Appendix ‘B’).
The applicant wishes to use the one year renewal opportunity to operate in the same mode as the previous year, as well as to refine operations and determine optimal locations to mitigate impacts on the neighbours and wildlife. The applicant has also informed staff that he may commit to a rezoning of a small portion of the site for helicopter use in the future.
Section 921(14) of the Local Government Act allows a temporary permit to be renewed once. In the absence of any problems with the temporary use permit by staff, it is recommended that the permit be renewed with the same $10,000 security be retained until project completion and remediation.
Respectfully submitted,
Janette Leung, Planner Encl.
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 1 Page 67 of 93 TEMPORARY USE PERMIT #5 – RENEWAL
TO: Whistler-Heli Skiing
ADDRESS: #3-4241 Village Stroll, Crystal Lodge, Whistler, BC, V0N 1B0
1. The Squamish-Lillooet Regional District issued a renewal of a Temporary Use Permit (a copy of which is attached as Schedule A to this Renewal) applying to those lands within the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District described below:
Parcel Identifier: 005-200-539 That Block A, DL 1158, Lillooet Land District (As shown on Schedule A to the Temporary Use Permit)
Civic Address: Black’s Farm
By this Renewal, the Temporary Use Permit #5 is renewed, on the same terms and conditions, effective January 24, 2006.
2. The renewed Temporary Use Permit shall expire on January 24, 2007.
3. The Temporary Use Permit may not be further renewed.
RESOLUTION TO RENEW PASSED BY THE BOARD
The 25th of October 2005.
Paul R. Edgington, Secretary SQUAMISH-LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT
K:\Temporary Use Permits\Whistler Heli-Skiing\RenewalSLRD EAD Application Agenda, Docu Octoberments\050927 11, T2005UP #5 Renewal Document.Doc Page 68 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 69 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 70 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 71 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 72 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 73 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 74 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 75 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 76 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 77 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 78 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 79 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 80 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 81 of 93 SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 82 of 93
COMMUNITY TOURISM PROGRAM Program and Access Guide
Contents 1. Introduction 2. Eligible Applicants 3. Eligible Projects 4. Eligible Costs 5. Selection Process 6. Payments 7. Application Process
1. Introduction The Program and Access Guide lays out the purpose of the Community Tourism Program and how to make an application.
1.1 Purpose and Objective The Community Tourism Program was initiated by the Premier when program funding was originally announced at the 2004 UBCM Convention. I want you to be able to tell your stories. I want you to be able to show off your communities wherever you live in the province. The province will make a one-time grant of $25 million to the UBCM to allow you to tell your stories of tourism across B.C. I want you to understand this is going to be your money. You can use it how you see fit, whether it’s for marketing or building products or connecting with other people. Since the UBCM Convention, work was undertaken a set of goals and principles for the program were proposed by UBCM Executive and confirmed by the Premier:
Program Goals:
Primary: Assist local governments in increasing tourism activity that, in turn, will build stronger economies.
Indirect: • help ensure that the Province achieves its goal of doubling tourism in the next ten years and supports the Province's Spirit of 2010 Tourism Strategy; • enhance the program management capacity of UBCM; and • increase industry’s awareness of the role of local government.
SLRD EAD Agenda, October 11, 2005 Page 83 of 93 Guiding Principles:
1. Fair and equitable access to program activities by local governments. 2. Recognize and accommodate the relative capacity of smaller communities. 3. Avoid duplication of existing tourism initiatives (particularly in marketing); should encourage innovative partnerships; and where appropriate, complement initiatives of other agencies. 4. Recognize the diversity of readiness and tourism development needs of different communities. 5. An open and transparent participation process. 6. Fill the gaps in sectors not being marketed or areas that have yet to identify their potential. 7. Communities should have wide latitude to determine which activities would be of greatest assistance to increasing tourism activities; the program should not be overly prescriptive in terms of eligible activities. 8. Recognize the variety of roles played by local government. 9. Funding is not to be used to replace existing local programs or activities and should result in new, increased activities. Funding was then released to UBCM in April 2005 and a funding program developed on the basis of those principles. Thus, phase 1 of the Community Tourism Program was initiated.
2. Eligible Applicants All local governments are eligible for funding under this program. Other agencies can be delegated responsibility to undertake projects, but receipt of funds and all application and reporting functions must be undertaken by the local government.
3. Eligible Projects Eligible projects are those that support the program goals and enhance tourism development: Eligible activities include but are not restricted to: • the development or upgrading of tourism plans • the implementation of initiatives identified by tourism planning activities • development or enhancement of tourism marketing promotional tools such as signage, brochures, and websites • Visitor information centre improvements • development or enhancement of festivals and events • capital projects directly related to tourism promotion
Joint initiatives with other funding partners are encouraged. As regional district funding formulas reflect electoral area populations, the funds are intended to serve those areas. Funding can be combined at regional or other scales for joint initiatives.
2005 Community TouriSLRDsm Pr EADogra mAgenda, Guide Octoberlines 11, 2005 Page 2of 11 Page 84 of 93 3.1 Conditions of application
Applications must demonstrate a business case or other planning process has been undertaken, or will be undertaken, to support the intended use of the funds. Evidence may include:
• A current tourism plan; • Minutes/summary of a community forum or stakeholders meeting; • Proven review of other informational resources; or • Other market research.
Those without existing or updated tourism plans for their community or region are encouraged to undertake this planning with part of the funds and to indicate this in the application. Information regarding the development of a Community Tourism Plan will be made available on the UBCM website in August 2005.
4. Eligible Project Costs Eligible costs means direct costs properly and reasonably incurred and paid by the local government in the development or implementation of an eligible program. A local government is eligible to be funded at 100% of the total program costs, to a maximum contribution as determined by the per-capita funding formula (see Schedule 1, Funding Breakdown with Maximum Entitlements). Applicants may apply for a portion or all of the funding allocated. Any unused portion will remain available for application in support of another project at a later date. Cost sharing is not a requirement, but local governments are strongly encouraged to identify other potential funding sources to better leverage the funds. Additional information on possible funding sources will be made available on the UBCM web site.
4.1 Ineligible Project Costs
• Any project that directly duplicates an existing tourism initiative. • Subsidies to existing programs. • Any activity that does not support the provincial objectives and is not directly related to: o tourism planning and/or promotion. o implementation of tourism initiatives. o development or enhancement of tourism promotional tools including visitor information centres. o development or enhancement of festivals and events. o tourism related capital projects.
2005 Community TouriSLRDsm Pr EADogra mAgenda, Guide Octoberlines 11, 2005 Page 3of 11 Page 85 of 93 4.2 Examples of Eligible Costs and Ineligible Costs Eligible costs include: • Direct costs for program development or implementation • Contractors wages • Capital expenditures
Ineligible costs: • Operational costs for existing programs
5. Selection Process 5.1 Screening Criteria All applications must meet the following criteria. • Application must be submitted by an "eligible applicant". • Application must be for an "eligible program". • Application must be complete and include the information outlined in section 7. • Application should demonstrate clear and measurable outcomes.
6. Payments, Records and Accounts for Approved Projects The Program Manager will inform successful applicants by letter. 75% of the approved grant amount will be forwarded on approval. The balance will be paid on satisfactory completion of the project and the receipt of a satisfactory final report and financial summary. A progress report is due 12 months after funding received if project is not complete. The Program Manager may require applicants to provide details of the types and amounts of expenses incurred. Significant changes to the project scope must be approved in advance by the Program Manager.
6.1 Payments 75% of the approved funding will be issued when the application is approved. A report on what was achieved must be completed before final payment and demonstrate that the funding was used to improve tourism activity in the community. This report may contain but not be limited to the following: Statistical data around number of visits Anticipated visitor traffic based on enhanced services or available activities Projected revenues Quantity of products produced Anecdotal information/media clippings A statement from the Chief Financial Officer verifying the total cost of the project is also required. Where applicable, this statement should also identify other contributions such as “in-kind”, matching funding, and other revenue sources required to complete the project. The balance of funding will be paid on receipt of a satisfactory reporting package.
2005 Community TouriSLRDsm Pr EADogra mAgenda, Guide Octoberlines 11, 2005 Page 4of 11 Page 86 of 93
6.2 Changes or Variations to an Approved Project Local governments need to advise, in writing, of any variation from the approved project (e.g. changes to milestones and deliverables). Program Manager’s approval may be required for such changes.
6.3 Accounting Records Chief Financial Officers must maintain acceptable accounting records that clearly disclose the nature and amounts of the different items of cost pertaining to the program activities. It will also attest that funding was for new activities and was not used to fund an existing program.
6.4 Terms and Conditions.
In applying for the Community Tourism Program grant administered by the UBCM, the following terms and conditions must be agreed to by the local government and will form part of the funding agreement.
1. That, as the applicant, local government is responsible for receipt of funds, application and reporting functions, even when other agencies have been delegated responsibility for undertaking the project.
2. That all projects funded under this program must support the program goals of enhanced tourism development in British Columbia.
3. That funding will not be used to duplicate or subsidize existing programs.
4. That, where a funded project is not completed within a 12-month time frame, a progress report including funds expended to date will be provided to the Program Manager.
5. That a final report detailing what was achieved will be prepared and submitted to the Program Manager on project completion.
6. That any unused funds will be returned to the UBCM on expiry of the program.
2005 Community TouriSLRDsm Pr EADogra mAgenda, Guide Octoberlines 11, 2005 Page 5of 11 Page 87 of 93 7. Application Process
7.1 Where to Apply Local Government Program Services UBCM/Municipal House 545 Superior Street Victoria, BC V8V 1X4
7.2 Contact Information Program Manager: Sue Clark, Executive Coordinator – LGPS Phone: 250-356-5134 Fax: 250-356-5119 E-mail: [email protected]
7.3 Application Contents Applications must include the following components: 1. A description of the project to be undertaken. 2. Evidence that a business plan or other planning process has been undertaken or will be undertaken to support the intended use of the funds and that the project will increase tourism in your community or region. 3. In the case of regional district programs, a description of how the project will increase tourism potential in the electoral areas or add value region wide. 4. Performance measures that will be used to determine the success of the undertaking 5. General cost estimates of the activities to be undertaken. 6. The date when a final report with accompanying financial statements will be submitted. 7. A resolution from board or council approving the application and accepting the terms and conditions of the program as set out in section 6.4. 8. Contact information for the staff member responsible for the application.
7.4 When to Apply The first intake for applications is open now and will close on March 30, 2007. Final reports must be received my February 1, 2008. This is the first phase of the Community Tourism Program funding. A supplementary allocation to phase 1 to reflect the amount of current tourism activity will be announced by September 30, 2005. A second phase will be developed and announced at a later date.
Attachments: Schedule 1. Community Tourism Program Funding Breakdown with Maximum Funding Entitlements Information on the funding formula is available on Civicnet.
2005 Community TouriSLRDsm Pr EADogra mAgenda, Guide Octoberlines 11, 2005 Page 6of 11 Page 88 of 93
SCHEDULE 1: COMMUNITY TOURISM PROGRAM Funding Breakdown with Maximum Entitlements - Sorted by Population
"No Hotel Base Population Tax" Local Government Population Grant Component Supplement ENTITLEMENT Northern Rockies RD 1,245 $5,000 $3,361.50 $1,023.73 $15,000.00 Central Coast RD 1,598 $5,000 $4,314.60 $1,313.99 $15,000.00 Islands Trust RD 1,598 $5,000 $4,314.60 $1,313.99 $15,000.00 Skeena-Queen Charlotte RD 2,509 $5,000 $6,774.30 $2,063.08 $15,000.00 Mount Waddington RD 2,586 $5,000 $6,982.20 $2,126.39 $15,000.00 Squamish-Lillooet RD 3,750 $5,000 $10,125.00 $3,083.51 $18,208.51 Powell River RD 6,419 $5,000 $16,565.04 $5,278.15 $26,843.19 Alberni-Clayoquot RD 8,378 $5,000 $20,796.48 $6,888.98 $32,685.46 Greater Vancouver RD 9,244 $5,000 $22,667.04 $7,601.06 $35,268.10 Kootenay Boundary RD 10,884 $5,000 $26,209.44 $8,949.59 $40,159.03 Fraser Valley RD 11,537 $5,000 $27,619.92 $9,486.53 $42,106.45 Kitimat-Stikine RD 12,528 $5,000 $29,760.48 $10,301.40 $45,061.88 Sunshine Coast RD 14,122 $5,000 $33,203.52 $11,612.10 $49,815.62 North Okanagan RD 16,118 $5,000 $36,911.16 $13,253.35 $55,164.51 Fraser-Fort George RD 16,719 $5,000 $37,884.78 $13,747.53 $56,632.31 East Kootenay RD 17,402 $5,000 $38,991.24 $14,309.14 $58,300.38 Bulkley-Nechako RD 19,399 $5,000 $42,226.38 $15,951.22 $63,177.60 Capital RD 19,499 $5,000 $42,388.38 $16,033.44 $63,421.82 Columbia Shuswap RD 19,737 $5,000 $42,773.94 $16,229.14 $64,003.08 Peace River RD 22,014 $5,000 $46,462.68 $18,101.45 $69,564.13 Okanagan- Similkameen RD 22,673 $5,000 $47,530.26 $18,643.33 $71,173.59 Thompson-Nicola RD 23,957 $5,000 $49,610.34 $19,699.12 $74,309.46 Cowichan Valley RD 31,632 $5,000 $60,281.82 $26,010.04 $91,291.86 Central Kootenay RD 31,889 $5,000 $60,420.60 $26,221.37 $91,641.97 Comox-Strathcona RD 32,558 $5,000 $60,781.86 $26,771.47 $92,553.33 Central Okanagan RD 33,936 $5,000 $61,525.98 $27,904.55 $94,430.53 Nanaimo RD 36,191 $5,000 $62,743.68 $29,758.77 $97,502.45 Cariboo RD 42,258 $5,000 $66,019.86 $34,747.49 $105,767.35
Silverton 230 $5,000 $621.00 $189.12 $15,000.00 Zeballos 232 $5,000 $626.40 $190.77 $15,000.00
2005 Community TouriSLRDsm Pr EADogra mAgenda, Guide Octoberlines 11, 2005 Page 7of 11 Page 89 of 93 Wells 261 $5,000 $704.70 $0.00 $15,000.00 Lytton 331 $5,000 $893.70 $272.17 $15,000.00 Slocan 357 $5,000 $963.90 $293.55 $15,000.00 Granisle 366 $5,000 $988.20 $300.95 $15,000.00 Sayward 403 $5,000 $1,088.10 $331.37 $15,000.00 Port Clements 533 $5,000 $1,439.10 $438.27 $15,000.00 New Denver 549 $5,000 $1,482.30 $451.43 $15,000.00 Tahsis 593 $5,000 $1,601.10 $487.61 $15,000.00 Alert Bay 611 $5,000 $1,649.70 $502.41 $15,000.00 Midway 639 $5,000 $1,725.30 $525.43 $15,000.00 Port Edward 658 $5,000 $1,776.60 $541.05 $15,000.00 Greenwood 665 $5,000 $1,795.50 $546.81 $15,000.00 Clinton 670 $5,000 $1,809.00 $550.92 $15,000.00 Canal Flats 673 $5,000 $1,817.10 $553.39 $15,000.00 Stewart 715 $5,000 $1,930.50 $587.92 $15,000.00 Belcarra 740 $5,000 $1,998.00 $608.48 $15,000.00 McBride 741 $5,000 $2,000.70 $609.30 $15,000.00 Radium Hot Springs 747 $5,000 $2,016.90 $614.24 $15,000.00 New Hazelton 763 $5,000 $2,060.10 $627.39 $15,000.00 Pouce Coupe 862 $5,000 $2,327.40 $708.80 $15,000.00 Sechelt Indian Gov't. 866 $5,000 $2,338.20 $712.09 $15,000.00 Masset 965 $5,000 $2,605.50 $793.49 $15,000.00 Hazelton 1,047 $5,000 $2,826.90 $860.92 $15,000.00 Kaslo 1,068 $5,000 $2,883.60 $878.18 $15,000.00 Montrose 1,087 $5,000 $2,934.90 $893.81 $15,000.00 Salmo 1,137 $5,000 $3,069.90 $934.92 $15,000.00 Cache Creek 1,142 $5,000 $3,083.40 $939.03 $15,000.00 Hudson's Hope 1,156 $5,000 $3,121.20 $950.54 $15,000.00 Port Alice 1,203 $5,000 $3,248.10 $989.19 $15,000.00 Valemount 1,244 $5,000 $3,358.80 $1,022.90 $15,000.00 Keremeos 1,271 $5,000 $3,431.70 $1,045.11 $15,000.00 Taylor 1,287 $5,000 $3,474.90 $1,058.26 $15,000.00 Fraser Lake 1,366 $5,000 $3,688.20 $1,123.22 $15,000.00 Telkwa 1,417 $5,000 $3,825.90 $1,165.16 $15,000.00 Lions Bay 1,417 $5,000 $3,825.90 $1,165.16 $15,000.00 Gold River 1,429 $5,000 $3,858.30 $1,175.02 $15,000.00 Harrison Hot Springs 1,533 $5,000 $4,139.10 $1,260.54 $15,000.00 Anmore 1,549 $5,000 $4,182.30 $1,273.70 $15,000.00 Lumby 1,699 $5,000 $4,587.30 $1,397.04 $15,000.00 Tofino 1,711 $5,000 $4,619.70 $1,406.90 $15,000.00 Warfield 1,746 $5,000 $4,714.20 $1,435.68 $15,000.00 Nakusp 1,785 $5,000 $4,819.50 $1,467.75 $15,000.00 100 Mile House 1,823 $5,000 $4,922.10 $1,499.00 $15,000.00 Ucluelet 1,847 $5,000 $4,986.90 $1,518.73 $15,000.00 Ashcroft 1,864 $5,000 $5,032.80 $1,532.71 $15,000.00 Highlands 1,962 $5,000 $5,297.40 $1,613.29 $15,000.00 Fort St. James 1,999 $5,000 $5,397.30 $1,643.72 $15,000.00
2005 Community TouriSLRDsm Pr EADogra mAgenda, Guide Octoberlines 11, 2005 Page 8of 11 Page 90 of 93 Fruitvale 2,056 $5,000 $5,551.20 $1,690.59 $15,000.00 Pemberton 2,204 $5,000 $5,950.80 $1,812.28 $15,000.00 Logan Lake 2,314 $5,000 $6,247.80 $1,902.73 $15,000.00 Tumbler Ridge 2,461 $5,000 $6,644.70 $2,023.61 $15,000.00 Chase 2,546 $5,000 $6,874.20 $2,093.50 $15,000.00 Burns Lake 2,649 $5,000 $7,152.30 $2,178.19 $15,000.00 Elkford 2,676 $5,000 $7,225.20 $2,200.39 $15,000.00 Princeton 2,684 $5,000 $7,246.80 $2,206.97 $15,000.00 Chetwynd 2,722 $5,000 $7,349.40 $2,238.22 $15,000.00 Cumberland 2,760 $5,000 $7,452.00 $2,269.47 $15,000.00 Lillooet 2,814 $5,000 $7,597.80 $2,313.87 $15,000.00 Port McNeill 2,900 $5,000 $7,830.00 $2,384.58 $15,214.58 Lake Cowichan 2,978 $5,000 $8,040.60 $2,448.72 $15,489.32 Sicamous 3,014 $5,000 $8,137.80 $2,478.32 $15,616.12 Enderby 3,015 $5,000 $8,140.50 $2,479.14 $15,619.64 Invermere 3,140 $5,000 $8,478.00 $2,581.93 $16,059.93 Bowen Island 3,344 $5,000 $9,028.80 $2,749.67 $16,778.47 Houston 3,666 $5,000 $9,898.20 $3,014.44 $17,912.64 Rossland 3,680 $5,000 $9,936.00 $3,025.95 $17,961.95 Lantzville 3,763 $5,000 $10,160.10 $3,094.20 $18,254.30 Sparwood 3,988 $5,000 $10,767.60 $3,279.21 $19,046.81 Grand Forks 4,173 $5,000 $11,267.10 $3,431.33 $19,698.43 Gibsons 4,205 $5,000 $11,353.50 $3,457.65 $19,811.15 Oliver 4,367 $5,000 $11,790.90 $3,590.85 $20,381.75 Golden 4,373 $5,000 $11,807.10 $3,595.79 $20,402.89 Armstrong 4,492 $5,000 $12,128.40 $3,693.64 $20,822.04 Port Hardy 4,581 $5,000 $12,368.70 $3,766.82 $21,135.52 Osoyoos 4,599 $5,000 $12,417.30 $3,781.62 $21,198.92 Vanderhoof 4,649 $5,000 $12,552.30 $3,822.73 $21,375.03 Fort Nelson 4,694 $5,000 $12,673.80 $3,859.74 $21,533.54 Duncan 4,871 $5,000 $13,151.70 $4,005.28 $22,156.98 Creston 5,039 $5,000 $13,584.24 $4,143.42 $22,727.66 Fernie 5,040 $5,000 $13,586.40 $4,144.24 $22,730.64 Peachland 5,077 $5,000 $13,666.32 $4,174.66 $22,840.98 Metchosin 5,272 $5,000 $14,087.52 $4,335.01 $23,422.53 Mackenzie 5,444 $5,000 $14,459.04 $4,476.44 $23,935.48 Spallumcheen 5,633 $5,000 $14,867.28 $4,631.85 $24,499.13 Smithers 5,637 $5,000 $14,875.92 $4,635.14 $24,511.06 Kent 6,077 $5,000 $15,826.32 $4,996.93 $25,823.25 Hope 6,558 $5,000 $16,865.28 $5,392.45 $27,257.73 Kimberley 6,927 $5,000 $17,662.32 $5,695.86 $28,358.18 Ladysmith 7,111 $5,000 $18,059.76 $5,847.16 $28,906.92 Qualicum Beach 7,383 $5,000 $18,647.28 $0.00 $23,647.28 Merritt 7,496 $5,000 $18,891.36 $0.00 $23,891.36 Castlegar 7,755 $5,000 $19,450.80 $6,376.70 $30,827.50 Trail 7,816 $5,000 $19,582.56 $6,426.86 $31,009.42 Revelstoke 7,911 $5,000 $19,787.76 $6,504.98 $31,292.74
2005 Community TouriSLRDsm Pr EADogra mAgenda, Guide Octoberlines 11, 2005 Page 9of 11 Page 91 of 93 View Royal 8,045 $5,000 $20,077.20 $6,615.16 $31,692.36 Sechelt 8,488 $5,000 $21,034.08 $6,979.43 $33,013.51 Sooke 9,730 $5,000 $23,716.80 $8,000.69 $36,717.49 Whistler 9,754 $5,000 $23,768.64 $0.00 $28,768.64 Nelson 9,784 $5,000 $23,833.44 $8,045.09 $36,878.53 Coldstream 9,896 $5,000 $24,075.36 $8,137.18 $37,212.54 Lake Country 10,064 $5,000 $24,438.24 $8,275.33 $37,713.57 Quesnel 10,417 $5,000 $25,200.72 $8,565.59 $38,766.31 Kitimat 10,449 $5,000 $25,269.84 $0.00 $30,269.84 North Saanich 11,103 $5,000 $26,682.48 $9,129.66 $40,812.14 Parksville 11,245 $5,000 $26,989.20 $9,246.43 $41,235.63 Dawson Creek 11,290 $5,000 $27,086.40 $9,283.43 $41,369.83 Sidney 11,495 $5,000 $27,529.20 $9,451.99 $41,981.19 Summerland 11,776 $5,000 $28,136.16 $9,683.05 $42,819.21 Williams Lake 11,833 $5,000 $28,259.28 $9,729.92 $42,989.20 Comox 12,394 $5,000 $29,471.04 $10,191.21 $44,662.25 Terrace 12,565 $5,000 $29,840.40 $10,331.82 $45,172.22 Powell River 13,680 $5,000 $32,248.80 $11,248.65 $48,497.45 Colwood 14,825 $5,000 $34,722.00 $12,190.15 $51,912.15 Prince Rupert 15,020 $5,000 $35,132.40 $0.00 $40,132.40 Squamish 15,623 $5,000 $36,109.26 $12,846.32 $53,955.58 Pitt Meadows 16,225 $5,000 $37,084.50 $13,341.33 $55,425.83 Salmon Arm 16,644 $5,000 $37,763.28 $13,685.86 $56,449.14 Esquimalt 17,038 $5,000 $38,401.56 $14,009.84 $57,411.40 Fort St. John 17,280 $5,000 $38,793.60 $14,208.83 $58,002.43 Oak Bay 18,357 $5,000 $40,538.34 $0.00 $45,538.34 Central Saanich 18,466 $5,000 $40,714.92 $15,184.04 $60,898.96 Port Alberni 18,490 $5,000 $40,753.80 $15,203.77 $60,957.57 Cranbrook 19,608 $5,000 $42,564.96 $16,123.07 $63,688.03 White Rock 19,735 $5,000 $42,770.70 $16,227.50 $63,998.20 Langford 20,901 $5,000 $44,659.62 $17,186.27 $66,845.89 Courtenay 21,068 $5,000 $44,930.16 $17,323.58 $67,253.74 Langley City 24,915 $5,000 $51,162.30 $20,486.86 $76,649.16 Port Moody 26,613 $5,000 $53,913.06 $21,883.07 $80,796.13 North Cowichan 28,065 $5,000 $56,265.30 $23,077.01 $84,342.31 Campbell River 30,666 $5,000 $59,759.64 $25,215.73 $89,975.37 Penticton 32,880 $5,000 $60,955.20 $27,036.24 $92,991.44 Mission 33,970 $5,000 $61,543.80 $27,932.51 $94,476.31 Vernon 35,548 $5,000 $62,395.92 $29,230.05 $96,625.97 West Vancouver 45,740 $5,000 $67,899.60 $37,610.63 $110,510.23 North Vancouver City 47,413 $5,000 $68,803.02 $0.00 $73,803.02 Port Coquitlam 56,119 $5,000 $73,504.26 $46,144.97 $124,649.23 New Westminster 58,286 $5,000 $74,674.44 $47,926.83 $127,601.27 Maple Ridge 70,416 $5,000 $81,224.64 $57,900.96 $144,125.60 Chilliwack 70,980 $5,000 $81,529.20 $0.00 $86,529.20 Victoria 77,538 $5,000 $85,070.52 $0.00 $90,070.52 Prince George 77,721 $5,000 $85,169.34 $63,907.65 $154,076.99
2005 Community TourismSLRD Progr EADam Agenda, Guide lOctoberines 11, 2005 Page 10of 11 Page 92 of 93 Nanaimo 78,271 $5,000 $85,466.34 $64,359.90 $154,826.24 Kamloops 81,699 $5,000 $87,317.46 $0.00 $92,317.46 North Vancouver Dist. 87,948 $5,000 $90,691.92 $72,317.00 $168,008.92 Langley Township 95,031 $5,000 $94,516.74 $78,141.14 $177,657.88 Delta 102,322 $5,000 $98,453.88 $84,136.31 $187,590.19 Kelowna 107,600 $5,000 $101,304.00 $0.00 $106,304.00 Saanich 109,639 $5,000 $102,405.06 $0.00 $107,405.06 Coquitlam 121,478 $5,000 $108,798.12 $99,887.72 $213,685.84 Abbotsford 126,882 $5,000 $111,716.28 $0.00 $116,716.28 Richmond 172,714 $5,000 $136,465.56 $0.00 $141,465.56 Burnaby 202,966 $5,000 $152,801.64 $0.00 $157,801.64 Surrey 383,962 $5,000 $250,539.48 $0.00 $255,539.48 Vancouver 584,601 $5,000 $358,884.54 $0.00 $363,884.54 TOTALS $920,000 $5,483,784.78 $1,737,004.26 $8,479,701.91
2005 Community TourismSLRD Progr EADam Agenda, Guide lOctoberines 11, 2005 Page 11of 11 Page 93 of 93