Mutations in Dihydropteroate Synthase Are Responsible for Sulfone and Sulfonamide Resistance in Plasmodium Falciparum (Malaria͞sulfadoxine͞drug Resistance)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mutations in Dihydropteroate Synthase Are Responsible for Sulfone and Sulfonamide Resistance in Plasmodium Falciparum (Malaria͞sulfadoxine͞drug Resistance) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 94, pp. 13944–13949, December 1997 Medical Sciences Mutations in dihydropteroate synthase are responsible for sulfone and sulfonamide resistance in Plasmodium falciparum (malariaysulfadoxineydrug resistance) TONY TRIGLIA*†,JOHN G. T. MENTING*†,CRAIG WILSON‡, AND ALAN F. COWMAN*§ *The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Victoria, Australia 3050; and ‡Geographic Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294 Communicated by Gustav J. V. Nossal, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, September 18, 1997 (received for review May 16, 1997) ABSTRACT Plasmodium falciparum causes the most se- become less useful as the parasite develops resistance (6); vere form of malaria in humans. An important class of drugs however, despite this they are still used extensively in Africa in malaria treatment is the sulfoneysulfonamide group, of where resistance is not yet widespread. which sulfadoxine is the most commonly used. The target of The DHPS gene has been cloned from P. falciparum and sulfadoxine is the enzyme dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS), encodes a putative bifunctional enzyme with 7,8-dihydro-6- and sequencing of the DHPS gene has identified amino acid hydroxymethylpterin pyrophosphokinase (PPPK), the enzyme differences that may be involved in the mechanism of resis- before DHPS in the folate pathway (7, 8). All the protozoan tance to this drug. In this study we have sequenced the DHPS DHPS enzymes sequenced so far have been either bifunctional gene in 10 isolates from Thailand and identified a new allele with both PPPK and DHPS domains, as in P. falciparum (7, 8), of DHPS that has a previously unidentified amino acid or trifunctional as in Pneumocystis carinii with another enzyme difference. We have expressed eight alleles of P. falciparum from the folate pathway dihydroneopterin aldolase (DHNA), PPPK-DHPS in Escherichia coli and purified the functional PPPK, and DHPS activities (9). The Toxoplasma gondii DHPS enzymes to homogeneity. Strikingly, the Ki for sulfadoxine enzyme is also likely to be bifunctional (10). varies by almost three orders of magnitude from 0.14 mM for Identification of amino acid differences in DHPS between the DHPS allele from sensitive isolates to 112 mM for an sulfadoxine-sensitive and -resistant isolates of P. falciparum enzyme expressed in a highly resistant isolate. Comparison of has suggested that mutations of this enzyme may be involved the Ki of different sulfonamides and the sulfone dapsone has in the mechanism of resistance to this antimalarial drug (7, 8); suggested that the amino acid differences in DHPS would however, no direct evidence for this has yet been obtained. A confer cross-resistance to these compounds. These results point mutation in a highly conserved region of the DHPS gene show that the amino acid differences in the DHPS enzyme of of E. coli confers sulfonamide resistance (11), and a 2-aa sulfadoxine-resistant isolates of P. falciparum are central to insertion in DHPS of both Neisseria meningitidis and Strepto- the mechanism of resistance to sulfones and sulfonamides. coccus pneumoniae has also been shown to confer sulfonamide resistance (12, 13). However, in both N. meningitidis and The sulfonamideysulfone group of compounds is used exten- Streptococcus pyogenes, sulfonamide resistance may be a result sively in the treatment of bacterial diseases including infections of multiple mutations in DHPS genes, which suggests they have caused by Streptococcus spp., Neisseria spp., and Mycobacte- arisen not by mutation of the sensitive gene but by intraspecies rium spp as well as many parasitic infections involving Pneu- or interspecies transfer of genetic material (13, 14). mocystis, Toxoplasma, Cryptosporidium, and Plasmodium. To test whether the amino acid differences found in DHPS Members of this group of chemotherapeutic compounds, such between sulfadoxine-resistant and -sensitive isolates of P. as sulfadoxine and dapsone, inhibit the enzyme dihydrop- falciparum are important in the drug resistance phenotype, we teroate synthase (DHPS) (1), a component of the folate have expressed eight different PPPK-DHPS alleles in E. coli, biosynthetic pathway. The enzyme DHPS catalyzes the con- purified the active enzymes, and determined their kinetic densation of p-aminobenzoic acid (pABA) with 6-hydroxy- parameters. We show that mutations within the P. falciparum methyldihydropterin pyrophosphate to yield 7,8-dihydrop- DHPS gene are responsible for the mechanism of sulfadoxine teroate (1). Plasmodia generate the vast majority of their resistance in P. falciparum. folates de novo, and hence inhibition of DHPS by these drugs leads to depletion of dTTP and decreased DNA synthesis (2). MATERIALS AND METHODS However, there is also some evidence for folate salvage by the Parasites and DNA. The origin of P. falciparum clones and parasite (3). The human host lacks most of this biosynthetic strains is shown in Table 1. The PR145, 336, 338, 342, 345, 347, pathway, and consequently many effective chemotherapeutic 327, 343, 352, and 346 isolates were kindly provided by Sodsri agents have been developed that target some of the enzymes Thaithong of the WHO Collaborating Centre on the Biological involved in the synthesis of pyrimidines. Characterization of Malaria Parasites, Chulalongkorn Univer- In the case of Plasmodium falciparum, the causative agent of sity, Bangkok, Thailand. Parasites were maintained in asyn- the most lethal form of human malaria, sulfadoxine has been chronous cultures as described (15). used extensively for prophylaxis. Usually, this has been in Expression Constructs. The full-length PPPK-DHPS gene combination with the antifolate drug, pyrimethamine, which from P. falciparum was amplified from D10 cDNA in two inhibits the enzyme dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) (4), halves using a unique AccI restriction site at position 963 in the because the combination of these drugs shows a marked synergism in their antimalarial effect (5). These drugs have Abbreviations: DHFR, dihydrofolate reductase; DHNA, dihydrone- opterin aldolase; DHPS, 7,8-dihydropteroate synthetase; pABA, p- The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge aminobenzoic acid; PPPK, 7,8-dihydro-6-hydroxymethylpterin pyro- phosphokinase. payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked ‘‘advertisement’’ in †T.T. and J.G.T.M. contributed equally to this work. accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. §To whom reprint requests should be addressed at: Walter and Eliza © 1997 by The National Academy of Sciences 0027-8424y97y9413944-6$2.00y0 Hall Institute of Medical Research, P.O. Royal Melbourne Hospital, PNAS is available online at http:yywww.pnas.org. Melbourne, Australia 3050. e-mail: [email protected]. 13944 Downloaded by guest on September 29, 2021 Medical Sciences: Triglia et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94 (1997) 13945 Table 1. Genotypes and sulfadoxine sensitivity of P. falciparum lines and genotypes of DHPS constructs Amino acid Isolate Origin Sulfadoxine 436 437 540 581 613 Construct Reference D10, HB3, ItG2, M24, NF7 PNG, Africa, Brazil S S A K A A D10-C (7, 8) 3D7 Africa R S G K A A 3D7-C (7, 22) Tak9y96 SE Asia R A G K A A Tak9y96-C (22) K1 SE Asia R S G K G A K1-C (7) W2mef, Dd2 SE Asia R F G K A S W2mef-C (7) PR145, 336, 338, 342, 345, 347 Thailand ND A G E A A PR145-C This publication PR327, 343, 352 Thailand ND S G E G A This publication PR346 Thailand ND A G E G A This publication S A K G A D10-CyG581 S G E A A 3D7-CyE540 ND, not determined. cDNA sequence where the A of the start codon is position 1. exchange buffer (10 mM TriszHCly5mMDTTy0.1 mg/ml The four oligonucleotides were: P1 (59-ATATATATACCA- PMSFy1 mM leupeptiny1 mM pepstatin, pH 8.6) before load- TGGAAACTATACAAGAA) with the introduced NcoI site ing onto a Mono Q HR 5y5 column (Pharmacia). Proteins underlined, P2 (59-CTTTTAATACATATATCCTTTTAT), were eluted with a gradient of 0–0.35 M NaCl in anion- P3 (59-TTAGAGATCCACAAGAAATAATAAAC), and P4 exchange buffer. At this pH the addition of DTT was essential. (59-GTTGAATTCCATGTTTGCACTTTCC) with the intro- The purified protein was stored in gel filtration buffer by y duced EcoRI site underlined. The two halves of the PPPK- ultrafiltration buffer exchange as described above and finally DHPS gene were cloned into the NcoI and EcoRI sites of the concentrated to 0.3–0.5 ml. PPPK-DHPS was detected in fractions by activity assay, probing Western blotted protein pTrc expression vector (Invitrogen) to express the native y PPPK-DHPS enzyme. A region of instability, encompassing a with affinity-purified anti-DHPS antibody, or on SDS PAGE stretch of 12 nucleotides at position 1551–1562, was mutated stained for protein. to the sequence AAAGAAGAAGAA by PCR mutagenesis. For purification of the D10-C enzyme, the final recovery was 11.1%, which represented 0.04% of the initial protein. Rou- This did not change the encoded amino acids but stabilized the tinely, around 0.2 mg of pure enzyme was obtained from 400 sequence in E. coli. The PPPK-DHPS D10 construct (D10-C) mg of starting protein. was then used as the starting plasmid for all subsequent Enzyme Assays. The PPPK-DHPS enzymes were assayed constructs (Table 1). The 3D7 (3D7-C) and W2 mef (W2 using a modification of a published procedure (16). The assay mef-C) alleles of PPPK-DHPS were constructed by amplifying was dependent on the presence of both PPPK and DHPS DNA fragments, which contained the required mutations, activities, but the DHPS activity component was isolated by from genomic DNA and subcloning into the D10 construct by measurement of the conversion of [3H]pABA to [3H]dihy- using appropriate restriction enzymes. Similarly, the K1 (K1- dropteroate. Enzyme activity was found to be dependent on y y C), Tak 9 96 (Tak 9 96-C), and PR145 (PR145-C) PPPK- protein concentration; hence, BSA was included in assay DHPS alleles were made by substituting amplified fragments reaction mixtures.
Recommended publications
  • Folic Acid Antagonists: Antimicrobial and Immunomodulating Mechanisms and Applications
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Folic Acid Antagonists: Antimicrobial and Immunomodulating Mechanisms and Applications Daniel Fernández-Villa 1, Maria Rosa Aguilar 1,2 and Luis Rojo 1,2,* 1 Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología de Polímeros, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, CSIC, 28006 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] (D.F.-V.); [email protected] (M.R.A.) 2 Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina, 28029 Madrid, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-915-622-900 Received: 18 September 2019; Accepted: 7 October 2019; Published: 9 October 2019 Abstract: Bacterial, protozoan and other microbial infections share an accelerated metabolic rate. In order to ensure a proper functioning of cell replication and proteins and nucleic acids synthesis processes, folate metabolism rate is also increased in these cases. For this reason, folic acid antagonists have been used since their discovery to treat different kinds of microbial infections, taking advantage of this metabolic difference when compared with human cells. However, resistances to these compounds have emerged since then and only combined therapies are currently used in clinic. In addition, some of these compounds have been found to have an immunomodulatory behavior that allows clinicians using them as anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive drugs. Therefore, the aim of this review is to provide an updated state-of-the-art on the use of antifolates as antibacterial and immunomodulating agents in the clinical setting, as well as to present their action mechanisms and currently investigated biomedical applications. Keywords: folic acid antagonists; antifolates; antibiotics; antibacterials; immunomodulation; sulfonamides; antimalarial 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Rifampicin/Cotrimoxazole/Isoniazid Versus Mefloquine Or Quinine Þ Sulfadoxine- Pyrimethamine for Malaria: a Randomized Trial
    PLoS CLINICAL TRIALS Rifampicin/Cotrimoxazole/Isoniazid Versus Mefloquine or Quinine þ Sulfadoxine- Pyrimethamine for Malaria: A Randomized Trial Blaise Genton1,2*, Ivo Mueller2, Inoni Betuela2, Gerard Casey2, Meza Ginny2, Michael P. Alpers2¤, John C. Reeder2 1 Swiss Tropical Institute, Basel, Switzerland, 2 Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, Goroka, Papua New Guinea . ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................. Trial Registration: . Objectives: Previous studies of a fixed combination including cotrimoxazole, rifampicin, and ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00322907 . isoniazid (Cotrifazid) showed efficacy against resistant strains of Plasmodium falciparum in . Funding: The study received . animal models and in small-scale human studies. We conducted a multicentric noninferiority financial support from Fatol . trial to assess the safety and efficacy of Cotrifazid against drug-resistant malaria in Papua New Arzneimittel GmbH, Germany. The . maintenance of the study site in the . Guinea. East Sepik Province was funded by . the Australian Agency for . Design: The trial design was open-label, block-randomised, comparative, and multicentric. International Development (AusAID) . grant to the Papua New Guinea . Institute of Medical Research. Fatol . Setting: The trial was conducted in four primary care health facilities, two in urban and two in Arzneimittel GmbH was able to . review and comment on the . rural areas of Madang and East Sepik Province, Papua New Guinea. protocol, and to review the study . conduct. The funders had no role in . study design, data collection and . Participants: Patients of all ages with recurrent uncomplicated malaria were included. analysis, decision to publish, or . preparation of the manuscript. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive Cotrifazid, mefloquine, or the . Competing Interests: The authors . standard treatment of quinine with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine (SP).
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Delivery Systems on Leprosy Therapy: Moving Towards Eradication?
    pharmaceutics Review Drug Delivery Systems on Leprosy Therapy: Moving Towards Eradication? Luíse L. Chaves 1,2,*, Yuri Patriota 2, José L. Soares-Sobrinho 2 , Alexandre C. C. Vieira 1,3, Sofia A. Costa Lima 1,4 and Salette Reis 1,* 1 Laboratório Associado para a Química Verde, Rede de Química e Tecnologia, Departamento de Ciências Químicas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal; [email protected] (A.C.C.V.); slima@ff.up.pt (S.A.C.L.) 2 Núcleo de Controle de Qualidade de Medicamentos e Correlatos, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 50740-521, Brazil; [email protected] (Y.P.); [email protected] (J.L.S.-S.) 3 Laboratório de Tecnologia dos Medicamentos, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 50740-521, Brazil 4 Cooperativa de Ensino Superior Politécnico e Universitário, Instituto Universitário de Ciências da Saúde, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal * Correspondence: [email protected] (L.L.C.); shreis@ff.up.pt (S.R.) Received: 30 October 2020; Accepted: 4 December 2020; Published: 11 December 2020 Abstract: Leprosy disease remains an important public health issue as it is still endemic in several countries. Mycobacterium leprae, the causative agent of leprosy, presents tropism for cells of the reticuloendothelial and peripheral nervous system. Current multidrug therapy consists of clofazimine, dapsone and rifampicin. Despite significant improvements in leprosy treatment, in most programs, successful completion of the therapy is still sub-optimal. Drug resistance has emerged in some countries. This review discusses the status of leprosy disease worldwide, providing information regarding infectious agents, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, actual treatment and future perspectives and strategies on targets for an efficient targeted delivery therapy.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Purpose & Scope the Objective of This Work Instruction Is to Provide
    REVISION: 02 7DENVER LABORATORY WORK INSTRUCTION DOCUMENT NUMBER FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION DEN-LB-WI-C.009 PAGE 1 OF 47 TITLE: ANALYSIS OF SULFONAMIDES, TRIMETHOPRIM, FLUOROQUINOLONES, ORIGINAL EFFECTIVE DATE: QUINOLONES, TRIPHENYLMETHANE DYES (AND THEIR LEUCO METABOLITES) AND METHYL 03/15/17 TESTOSTERONE IN FISH AND SHRIMP USING LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY MASS SPECTROMETRY REVISED: 03 2018 1. Purpose & Scope The objective of this work instruction is to provide instruction on the routine multi-class, multi-residue LC-MS/MS screening of aquaculture samples using components of LIBs 4562 and 4614, and DEN-LAB validation package # 13-37, 15-12, 15-13, 15-15, 15-22, 15-32 & 16-16. 2. Procedure 2.1 Sample Preparation 2.1.1 Aquaculture sample matrices which are appropriate for analysis include but are not limited to: tilapia, eel, swai, pangasius, basa, pompano, red drum, bass, croaker, catfish, trout, salmon, sablefish, scallops, shrimp, and frog legs. 2.1.2 Preparation of homogeneous samples of fish depends on whether skin and/or bones are considered edible for the particular species and product. Skin is removed from species whose skin is considered inedible (e.g., catfish), as are other inedible portions, such as heads, tails, scales, fins, viscera, and inedible bones. 2.1.3 Remove at least 50 g of edible tissue from each of 12 subs. Combine the 600 g tissue in robot coupe with dry ice to homogenize into a fine powder. Note: It is effective to pulse the dry ice block in the robot coupe prior to adding the tissue. 2.1.4 Shrimp sample preparation 2.1.4.1 Thoroughly remove any breading before analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy of Sulphadoxine and Pyrimethamine, Doxycycline and Their Combination in the Treatment of Chloroquine Resistant Falciparum Malaria
    Efficacy of Sulphadoxine and Pyrimethamine, Doxycycline and their combination in the treatment of chloroquine resistant Falciparum Malaria Habab K. Elkheir, MPhar, El-Fatih I. Elkarim, MPhar, PhD, Idris B. Eltayeb, MPhar, PhD, Abd E. ElKadaru, MBBS, MD, Hamza A. Babiker, MSc, PhD, Adil M. Ibrahim, PhD, MIBiol. ABSTRACT Objective: The present in vivo study evaluates the 1996-1998. The study demonstrated that only 46% and efficacy of sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine, doxycycline and 78% of the patients were cured after 4 days of treatment their combination in the treatment of Sudanese patients by doxycycline and sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine. Patients infected by chloroquine resistant falciparum malaria. treated with sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine in combination Methods: Febrile patients with positive blood smears of with doxycycline had a cure rate of 90% and 100% after Plasmodium falciparum were given chloroquine 25mg- 3-4 days of treatment, a single recrudescent case was base/kg body weight and followed up for 3 days. Patients detected on day 6. No relapses occurred during the follow with recrudescence due to chloroquine resistance were up period. All patients were successfully treated by all readmitted for test treatment. Using simple number regimens with the exception of one case treated by randomization patients were divided into groups, A, B and doxycycline. All treatments were well tolerated but a few C. These were treated with doxycycline, sulphadoxine/ cases had complaints of nausea. pyrimethamine and a combination therapy of sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine plus doxycycline. Doxycycline was initially administered as a single dose of Conclusion: The combination therapy of doxycycline/ 200mg followed by 100mg daily for 6 days whereas sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine appeared to be significantly sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine was given as a single dose of effective in the treatment of patients with chloroquine sulphadoxine 1500mg and pyrimethamine 75mg.
    [Show full text]
  • Doxycycline/Minocycline Step Therapy Criteria Program Summary
    Doxycycline/Minocycline Step Therapy Criteria Program Summary This criteria applies to Commercial, NetResults F series and Health Insurance Marketplace formularies. OBJECTIVE The intent of the Doxycycline/Minocycline Step Therapy (ST) program is to encourage the use of both cost-effective preferred doxycycline and minocycline products prior to the use of nonpreferred brand or generic doxycycline or minocycline products and to accommodate for use of brand nonpreferred doxycycline or minocycline products when the generic products cannot be used due to previous trial, documented intolerance, FDA labeled contraindication, or hypersensitivity. Requests for nonpreferred doxycycline and minocycline products will be reviewed when patient-specific documentation has been provided. TARGET DRUGS Doxycycline Products: Acticlate™ (doxycycline hyclate tablet) Adoxa (doxycycline monohydrate tablet, capsule) Doryx, Doryx MPC® (doxycycline hyclate delayed-release tablet)a Doxycycline (doxycycline hyclate delayed-release capsulea, doxycycline hyclate tablet, doxycycline monohydrate delayed release capsule) Monodox (doxycycline monohydrate capsule) Oracea (doxycycline monohydrate delayed-release capsule) Vibramycin (doxycycline hyclate capsule, doxycycline monohydrate suspension, doxycycline calcium syrup Minocycline Products: Minocin (minocycline capsule) minocycline tablet Solodyn (minocycline extended-release tablet)a a - available as a generic; designated target PRIOR AUTHORIZATION CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL Brand and Nonpreferred generic doxycycline and minocycline products will be approved when BOTH of the following are met: 1. ONE of the following: a. The patient’s medication history includes use of a preferred generic doxycycline product OR b. The patient has a documented intolerance, FDA labeled contraindication, or hypersensitivity to a preferred generic doxycycline product AND 2. ONE of the following is met: a. The patient’s medication history includes use of a preferred generic minocycline product OR b.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydroxychloroquine Or Chloroquine for Treating Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) – a PROTOCOL for a Systematic Review of Individual Participant Data
    Hydroxychloroquine or Chloroquine for treating Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) – a PROTOCOL for a systematic review of Individual Participant Data Authors Fontes LE, Riera R, Miranda E, Oke J, Heneghan CJ, Aronson JK, Pacheco RL, Martimbianco ALC, Nunan D BACKGROUND In the face of the pandemic of SARS CoV2, urgent research is needed to test potential therapeutic agents against the disease. Reliable research shall inform clinical decision makers. Currently, there are several studies testing the efficacy and safety profiles of different pharmacological interventions. Among these drugs, we can cite antimalarial, antivirals, biological drugs, interferon, etc. As of 6 April 2020 there are three published reportsand 100 ongoing trials testing hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine alone or in association with other drugs for COVID-19. This prospective systematic review with Individual Participant data aims to assess the rigour of the best-available evidence for hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine as treatment for COVID-19 infection. The PICO framework is: P: adults with COVID-19 infection I: chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine (alone or in association) C: placebo, other active treatments, usual standard care without antimalarials O: efficacy and safety outcomes OBJECTIVES To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19 infection. METHODS Criteria for considering studies for this review Types of studies We shall include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a parallel design. We intend to include even small trials (<50 participants), facing the urgent need for evidence to respond to the current pandemic. Quasi-randomized, non-randomized, or observational studies will be excluded due to a higher risk of confounding and selection bias (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
    DRUG THERAPY TOPICS Oral Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Sanjay Bhambri, DO; James Q. Del Rosso, DO; Avani Desai, MD Oral trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is vulgaris.2 TMP-SMX may be advantageous because approved by the US Food and Drug Administration of the synergistic effects of its 2 antibacterial agents, for the treatment of urinary tract infections, the bactericidal activity, the drug’s potential ability shigellosis, acute otitis media in pediatric to decrease the emergence of resistance because of its patients, and Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. individual components, and the lack of widespread or TMP-SMX has been used off label in dermatology chronic use in the United States in the patient popu- to treat various skin conditions, including acne lation most commonly treated for acne vulgaris.2-10 vulgaris and other skin and soft tissue infections, especially those infections caused by methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus. What efficacy data is available on the use of Cutis. 2007;79:430-434. TMP-SMX for the treatment of acne vulgaris? The use of TMP-SMX (trimethoprim 80 mg/ sulfamethoxazole 400 mg) as monotherapy in the cne vulgaris is a common disorder of the treatment of acne vulgaris was first reported in 1971 pilosebaceous unit. Tetracycline has been by Cotterill et al2 who compared the drug’s effective- A used in the treatment of acne vulgaris since ness with that of oxytetracycline. The study included the mid to late 1950s, with doxycycline and minocy- 42 subjects aged 12 to 32 years who were randomly cline becoming available in 1967 and 1972, respec- selected to receive 250 mg of oxytetracycline or tively.1 Tetracycline antibiotics have been shown to TMP-SMX for 3 months.
    [Show full text]
  • The End of a Dogma: the Safety of Doxycycline Use in Young Children for Malaria Treatment
    Gaillard et al. Malar J (2017) 16:148 DOI 10.1186/s12936-017-1797-9 Malaria Journal REVIEW Open Access The end of a dogma: the safety of doxycycline use in young children for malaria treatment Tiphaine Gaillard1, Sébastien Briolant2,3, Marylin Madamet2,3,4 and Bruno Pradines2,3,4* Abstract Anti-malarial drug resistance to chloroquine and sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine has spread from Southeast Asia to Africa. Furthermore, the recent emergence of resistance to artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) in South- east Asia highlights the need to identify new anti-malarial drugs. Doxycycline is recommended for malaria chemo- prophylaxis for travel in endemic areas, or in combination with the use of quinine for malaria treatment when ACT is unavailable or when the treatment of severe malaria with artesunate fails. However, doxycycline is not used in young children under 8 years of age due to its contraindication due to the risk of yellow tooth discolouration and dental enamel hypoplasia. Doxycycline was developed after tetracycline and was labelled with the same side-efects as the earlier tetracyclines. However, recent studies report little or no efects of doxycycline on tooth staining or dental enamel hypoplasia in children under 8 years of age. In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Pre- vention have recommended the use of doxycycline for the treatment of acute and chronic Q fever and tick-borne rickettsial diseases in young children. It is time to rehabilitate doxycycline and to recommend it for malaria treatment in children under 8 years of age. Keywords: Antibiotics, Doxycycline, Malaria, Plasmodium falciparum, Anti-malarial drug, Resistance, Prophylaxis, Treatment, Children Background were estimated to have occurred in children aged under According to the latest World Health Organization 5 years, which is equivalent to 70% of the global total.
    [Show full text]
  • Malarial Dihydrofolate Reductase As a Paradigm for Drug Development Against a Resistance-Compromised Target
    Malarial dihydrofolate reductase as a paradigm for drug development against a resistance-compromised target Yongyuth Yuthavonga,1, Bongkoch Tarnchompooa, Tirayut Vilaivanb, Penchit Chitnumsuba, Sumalee Kamchonwongpaisana, Susan A. Charmanc, Danielle N. McLennanc, Karen L. Whitec, Livia Vivasd, Emily Bongardd, Chawanee Thongphanchanga, Supannee Taweechaia, Jarunee Vanichtanankula, Roonglawan Rattanajaka, Uthai Arwona, Pascal Fantauzzie, Jirundon Yuvaniyamaf, William N. Charmanc, and David Matthewse aBIOTEC, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Thailand Science Park, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand; bDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; cMonash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville 3052, Australia; dLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, London WC1E 7HT, England; eMedicines for Malaria Venture, 1215 Geneva, Switzerland; and fDepartment of Biochemistry and Center for Excellence in Protein Structure and Function, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand Edited by Wim Hol, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, and accepted by the Editorial Board September 8, 2012 (received for review March 16, 2012) Malarial dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) is the target of antifolate target is P. falciparum dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), which is antimalarial drugs such as pyrimethamine and cycloguanil, the inhibited by the antimalarials PYR and cycloguanil (CG) (Fig. 1). clinical efficacy of which have been
    [Show full text]
  • Sulfonamide Antibiotic Allergy
    Sulfonamide antibiotic allergy Note: This document uses spelling according to the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) approved terminology for medicines (1999) in which the terms sulfur, sulfite, sulfate, and sulfonamide replace sulphur, sulphite, sulphate and sulphonamide. Sulfonamide antibiotic allergy Sulfonamide antibiotics can cause allergic reactions, ranging from mild rash to severe blistering rash through to anaphylaxis, the most dangerous type of allergic reaction. If you are allergic to one sulfonamide antibiotic, there is a risk that you might also react to other sulfonamide antibiotics. Sulfonamide antibiotics available on prescription in Australia include: • Sulfamethoxazole used in combination with trimethoprim, available as Bactrim, Resprim or Septrin. • Less commonly used sulfonamide antibiotics include sulfadiazine (tablets, injection or cream), sulfadoxine (for malaria), and sulfacetamide antibiotic eye drops. • Sulfasalazine (Salazopyrin, Pyralin), used in inflammatory bowel disease or arthritis, is a combination sulfapyridine (a sulfonamide antibiotic) and a salicylate. If you have had an allergic reaction to Bactrim, Resprim or Septrin, there is no way of knowing whether the allergy was to sulfamethoxazole or to trimethoprim, therefore you should avoid trimethoprim (Alprim, Triprim) as well as sulfonamide antibiotics. Sometimes those who have had an allergic reaction to a sulfonamide antibiotic are labelled as “sulfur allergic” or allergic to sulfur, sulphur or sulfa. This wording should not be used since it is ambiguous and can cause confusion. Some people wrongly assume that they will be allergic to non-antibiotic sulfonamides or to other sulfur containing medicines or sulfite preservatives. It is important to know that sulfur is an element which occurs throughout our body as a building block of life, and it is not possible to be allergic to sulfur itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Estonian Statistics on Medicines 2016 1/41
    Estonian Statistics on Medicines 2016 ATC code ATC group / Active substance (rout of admin.) Quantity sold Unit DDD Unit DDD/1000/ day A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 167,8985 A01 STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 0,0738 A01A STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 0,0738 A01AB Antiinfectives and antiseptics for local oral treatment 0,0738 A01AB09 Miconazole (O) 7088 g 0,2 g 0,0738 A01AB12 Hexetidine (O) 1951200 ml A01AB81 Neomycin+ Benzocaine (dental) 30200 pieces A01AB82 Demeclocycline+ Triamcinolone (dental) 680 g A01AC Corticosteroids for local oral treatment A01AC81 Dexamethasone+ Thymol (dental) 3094 ml A01AD Other agents for local oral treatment A01AD80 Lidocaine+ Cetylpyridinium chloride (gingival) 227150 g A01AD81 Lidocaine+ Cetrimide (O) 30900 g A01AD82 Choline salicylate (O) 864720 pieces A01AD83 Lidocaine+ Chamomille extract (O) 370080 g A01AD90 Lidocaine+ Paraformaldehyde (dental) 405 g A02 DRUGS FOR ACID RELATED DISORDERS 47,1312 A02A ANTACIDS 1,0133 Combinations and complexes of aluminium, calcium and A02AD 1,0133 magnesium compounds A02AD81 Aluminium hydroxide+ Magnesium hydroxide (O) 811120 pieces 10 pieces 0,1689 A02AD81 Aluminium hydroxide+ Magnesium hydroxide (O) 3101974 ml 50 ml 0,1292 A02AD83 Calcium carbonate+ Magnesium carbonate (O) 3434232 pieces 10 pieces 0,7152 DRUGS FOR PEPTIC ULCER AND GASTRO- A02B 46,1179 OESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (GORD) A02BA H2-receptor antagonists 2,3855 A02BA02 Ranitidine (O) 340327,5 g 0,3 g 2,3624 A02BA02 Ranitidine (P) 3318,25 g 0,3 g 0,0230 A02BC Proton pump inhibitors 43,7324 A02BC01 Omeprazole
    [Show full text]