DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Workshop on Health-Care Waste Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Workshop on Health-Care Waste Management Regional Workshop on Health-care Waste Management Kathmandu, Nepal, 7-9 December 2011 Regional Office for South-East Asia SEA-EH-579 Distribution: General Regional Workshop on Health-care Waste Management Kathmandu, Nepal, 7-9 December 2011 Regional Office for South-East Asia © World Health Organization 2012 All rights reserved. Requests for publications, or for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – can be obtained from Publishing and Sales, World Health Organization, Regional Office for South- East Asia, Indraprastha Estate, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, New Delhi 110 002, India (fax: +91 11 23370197; e-mail: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. This publication does not necessarily represent the decisions or policies of the World Health Organization. Printed in India Contents Page Abbreviations .........................................................................................................v 1. Background ...................................................................................................1 2. Objectives of the workshop ...........................................................................2 3. Inaugural session............................................................................................2 4. Global and regional overview of management of HCW.................................4 4.1 Essential environmental health standards in health care – Yves Chartier, Public Health Engineer, WHO-HQ, Geneva....................4 4.2 HCWM in the SEA Region – Ms Payden ................................................7 4.3 HCWM: Issues and challenges – Ruth Stringer, Health Care Without Harm...................................................................................................10 4.4 Indian legislation on HCWM: Issues and challenges – Dr Geeta Mehta, MD, MPH ...............................................................................13 5. Panel discussions .........................................................................................16 5.1 Country-level initiatives in HCWM: Case studies from Nepal, India and Indonesia – Moderated by Terrence Thompson............................16 5.2 Best practices and approaches on management of HCW and phasing out mercury equipment in health-care services – Moderated by Yves Chartier ................................................................22 6. Field visit to model waste management systems ...........................................30 6.1 HCW water treatment at Dhulikhel .....................................................30 6.2 HCWM System at Bir Hospital, Kathmandu.........................................30 7. Group work: development of country-level action plans ..............................31 7.1 Bangladesh..........................................................................................32 7.2 Bhutan ................................................................................................33 iii 7.3 Democratic People’s Republic of Korea...............................................35 7.4 India....................................................................................................36 7.5 Indonesia ............................................................................................39 7.6 Maldives..............................................................................................41 7.7 Myanmar.............................................................................................43 7.8 Nepal ..................................................................................................44 7.9 Sri Lanka .............................................................................................45 7.10 Thailand..............................................................................................48 7.11 Timor-Leste .........................................................................................49 8. Recommendations.......................................................................................50 8.1 Recommendations for Member States .................................................51 8.2 Recommendations for WHO...............................................................52 9. Closing.........................................................................................................53 Annexes 1. Message from Dr Samlee Plianbangchang, Regional Director, World Health Organization, South-East Asia Region.....................................54 2. Agenda ........................................................................................................57 3. List of participants........................................................................................59 4. Field visit sites – detailed information...........................................................64 iv Abbreviations AIDS acquired immune deficiency syndrome BMW biomedical waste CBWTF centralized [or common] biomedical waste treatment facility CEPHED Centre for Public Health and Environmental Development CFL compact fluorescent lamp CHC community health centre CPCB Central Pollution Control Board GEF Global Environment Facility HBV hepatitis B virus HCAI health-care associated infections HCF health-care facilities HCV hepatitis C virus HCW health-care waste HCWH health care without harm HCWM health-care waste management HECAF Healthcare Foundation, Nepal HIV human immunodeficiency virus IEC information, education and communication v IGNOU Indira Gandhi Open University INGO international nongovernmental organization MoEF Ministry of Environment and Forests MoH Ministry of Health MoHFW Ministry of Health and Family Welfare MoPH Ministry of Public Health MT megatonnes NGO nongovernmental organization PCC Pollution Control Committee PPE personal protective equipment SEA South-East Asia SPCB State Pollution Control Board UN United Nations UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNEP United Nations Environment Programme WHO World Health Organization vi 1. Background Health-care waste (HCW) is generated in the process of providing medical services. HCW is a by-product of health care that includes sharps, non- sharps, blood, body parts, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, medical devices and radioactive materials. These waste products are hazardous by nature and are basically classified as infectious and non-infectious wastes. They can be solid or liquid, but gas emissions from medical waste incineration are also considered as HCW. Outdated pharmaceuticals also contribute to stocks of hazardous waste generated by the health sector. The daily amount of HCW generated in health facilities of countries belonging to the World Health Organization (WHO) South-East Asia (SEA) Region is estimated to be over 1000 metric tonnes. The improper management of wastes generated in health-care facilities (HCF) can severely affect the health of caregivers, patients and individual members of the community. Additional health hazards occur from scavenging on waste disposal sites and from manual sorting of waste at health-care facilities. These practices are common in many regions of the world. The waste handlers are at immediate risk of needle-stick injuries and other exposures to toxic or infectious materials. The safe disposal of used needles and syringes and other infectious sharps should, therefore, be seen as a critical component of any HCW management programme, if infection is to be prevented. In the past several years, WHO has been supporting Member countries to develop policies, guidelines and laws on health-care waste management (HCWM) and capacity-building in this area. In 1997, the WHO SEA Regional Office initiated a regional consultation which drew attention to the need for sound management of HCW in Member countries and led to the framing of an action plan for the same. In 2001, the Government of India and WHO launched a pilot project on HCWM in 11 states in that country. National guidelines supporting the new legislation were developed with WHO assistance. WHO, jointly with Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU) in New Delhi, developed a distance learning course on HCWM in 2005. Since then hundreds of health workers from Member countries have enrolled in the course. The WHO SEA 1 Regional Workshop on Health-care Waste Management Regional Office in collaboration with
Load more

Recommended publications
  • USAID Sector Environmental Guidelines Healthcare Waste
    SECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES HEALTHCARE WASTE Partial Update 2015 | Last Full Update: Prior to 2003 1 This document was prepared by The Cadmus Group, Inc. under USAID’s Global Environmental Management Support Program, Contract Number GS-10F-0105J. The contents are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Cover Photo: USAID/Honduras Health Service Improvement: A mother and child in a clinic in Taulabé, Honduras. For the past five years, USAID has helped local governments in Copán take over the management of area health care systems through a process called decentralization, which transfers health care management responsibilities and resources from the central government to the local government. The central government continues to finance health care services, while local governments implement and manage them. Photographer: Hector Medrano About this document and the Sector Environmental Guidelines This document presents one sector of the Sector Environmental Guidelines prepared for USAID under the Agency’s Global Environmental Management Support Project (GEMS). All sectors are accessible at www.usaidgems.org/bestPractice.htm. Purpose. The purpose of this document and the Sector Environmental Guidelines overall is to support environmentally sound design and management (ESDM) of common USAID sectoral development activities by providing concise, plain-language information regarding: • the typical, potential adverse impacts of activities in these sectors; • how to prevent or otherwise mitigate these impacts, both in the form of general activity design guidance and specific design, construction and operating measures; • how to minimize vulnerability of activities to climate change; and • more detailed resources for further exploration of these issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Inherent Resolve
    Lead Inspector General for Overseas Contingency Operations OPERATION INHERENT RESOLVE DoD DoS USAID OFFICE OF OFFICE OF OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL INSPECTOR GENERAL INSPECTOR GENERAL Quarterly Report and Biannual Report to the United States Congress September 30, 2015 LEAD INSPECTOR GENERAL MISSION The Lead Inspector General for Overseas Contingency Operations will coordinate among the Inspectors General specified under the law to: • develop a joint strategic plan to conduct comprehensive oversight over all aspects of the contingency operation • ensure independent and effective oversight of all programs and operations of the federal government in support of the contingency operation through either joint or individual audits, inspections, and investigations • promote economy, efficiency, and effectiveness and prevent, detect, and deter fraud, waste, and abuse • perform analyses to ascertain the accuracy of information provided by federal agencies relating to obligations and expenditures, costs of programs and projects, accountability of funds, and the award and execution of major contracts, grants, and agreements • report quarterly and biannually to the Congress on the contingency operation and activities of the Lead Inspector General (Pursuant to section 8L of the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended) FOREWORD We are pleased to submit our combined Lead Inspector General (Lead IG) biannual and quarterly report to Congress on Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR). This is our third quarterly report on the overseas contingency operation (OCO), discharging our individual and collective agency oversight responsibilities pursuant to section 8L of the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended. The OCO is dedicated to countering the terrorist threat posed by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) in Iraq, Syria, the region, and the broader international community.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2016
    www.rbs0.com/syria37.pdf 1 Oct 2016 Page 1 of 234 Syria & Iraq: September 2016 Copyright 2016 by Ronald B. Standler No copyright claimed for quotations. No copyright claimed for works of the U.S. Government. Table of Contents 1. Chemical Weapons U.N. Security Council begins to ask who used chemical weapons in Syria? ISIL used mustard in Iraq (11 Aug 2015) 2. Syria United Nations Diverted from Syria death toll in Syria now over 301,000 (30 Sep) Free Syrian Army is Leaderless since June 2015 Turkey is an ally from Hell U.S. troops in Syria Recognition that Assad is Winning the Civil War Peace Negotiations for Syria Future of Assad must be decided by Syrians Planning for Peace Negotiations in Geneva New Russia/USA Agreements (9 Sep) U.N. Security Council meeting (21 Sep) Syrian speech to U.N. General Assembly (24 Sep) more meetings and negotiations 22-30 Sep 2016 Friends of Syria meeting in London (7 Sep) ISSG meetings (20, 22 Sep 2016) occasional reports of violations of the Cessation of Hostilities agreement proposed 48-hour ceasefires in Aleppo siege of Aleppo (1-12 Sep} Violations of new agreements in Syria (12-19 Sep) continuing civil war in Syria (20-30 Sep) bombing hospitals in Syria surrender of Moadamiyeh U.N. Reports war crimes prosecution? 3. Iraq Atrocities in Iraq No Criminal Prosecution of Iraqi Army Officers No Prosecution for Fall of Mosul No Prosecution for Rout at Ramadi No Criminal Prosecution for Employing "Ghost Soldiers" www.rbs0.com/syria37.pdf 1 Oct 2016 Page 2 of 234 Iraq is a failed nation U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole-Of-Syria DONOR UPDATE: January-June 2019 5 1
    Whole-of-Syria DONOR UPDATE January - June 2019 A WHO staff member greets a mother and her child outside the Paediatric Hospital in Damascus. Credit: WHO CONTENT 04 FOREWORD 06 1. OVERVIEW 10 2. GEOGRAPHICAL AREAS OF FOCUS 10 North-west Syria 13 North-east Syria 18 Al-Hol camp 20 South-west Syria 21 Rukban settlement 22 3. SHIFTING TO A HEALTH RESPONSE BASED ON THE SEVERITY SCALE 25 4. ATTACKS ON HEALTH CARE 25 Background 25 Attacks on health care from a global perspective 26 Attacks in Syria in 2019 28 The consequences of attacks on health care 29 Impact of attacks on health care delivery in Syria 32 5. ACTIVITIES JANUARY-JUNE 2019 32 Trauma care 33 Secondary health care and referral 35 Primary health care 38 Immunization and polio eradication 38 Mental health and psychosocial support WHO Country Office (Damascus – Syrian Arab Republic) 40 Health information Dr Ni’ma Abid, WHO Representative a.i 41 Health sector coordination [email protected] 42 Nutrition 43 Water, sanitation and hygiene 43 Working with partners WHO Country Office (Damascus – Syrian Arab Republic) Noha Alarabi, Donor Relations 6. MAIN DISEASES OF CONCERN [email protected] 45 45 Measles WHO Headquarters (Geneva, Switzerland) 46 Polio Laila Milad, Manager, Resource Mobilization 47 Cutaneous leishmaniasis [email protected] 47 Tuberculosis 49 7. WHOLE-OF-SYRIA INTERNAL COORDINATION © World Health Organization 2019 8. FUNDS RECEIVED AS OF END JUNE 2019 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution- 49 NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement of the Assyrians of Iraq
    J,?r— of % LÏÏS] ° ^ ‘ N°-C. 352. M. 179. , 935. VII. Geneva, September 12th, 1935. LEAGUE OF NATIONS SETTLEMENT OF THE ASSYRIANS OF IRAQ Report of the Committee of the Council on the Settlem ent of the A ssyrians of Iraq in the Region of the Ghab. (French Mandated Territories of the Levant) Series of League of Nations Publications VII. POLITICAL 1935. VII. 12. — 3 — CONTENTS. Page R eport b y th e Com m ittee of th e Co un c il .................................................................... 5 Annex i. — R e po r t b y t h e Ch airm a n of th e Com m ittee of th e Co unc il on h is M issio n to Sy r ia a n d I raq ............................................................................................................................................. 8 Annex 2. — D e t a il e d S t u d y of t h e P l a n for t h e S et t l e m en t of th e A ssy r ia n s in t h e P l a in o f th e G h a b : I. Note by the Secretary-G eneral..................................................................... n II. Letter from the French G overnm ent............................................................. n III. Report on the Settlement of the Assyrians in the Plain of the Ghab, prepared by the High Commission of the Territories of the Levant under French Mandate in Co-operation with Two Experts of the League of Nations . it Appendix I. — Position at June 30th, 1935, of the Accounts concerning the Cost of the Settlement on the Khabur of the Assyrians of Ira q .................
    [Show full text]
  • Leveraging Urbanization in South Asia
    Leveraging Urbanization in South Asia Leveraging Urbanization in South Asia Managing Spatial Transformation for Prosperity and Livability Peter Ellis and Mark Roberts © 2016 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved 1 2 3 4 18 17 16 15 This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The fi ndings, interpre- tations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily refl ect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifi cally reserved. Rights and Permissions This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo. Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, you are free to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt this work, including for commercial purposes, under the following conditions: Attribution—Please cite the work as follows: Ellis, Peter, and Mark Roberts. 2016. Leveraging Urban- ization in South Asia: Managing Spatial Transformation for Prosperity and Livability.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments Xxx (2017) Xxx–Xxx
    Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments xxx (2017) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/seta Original article A review of sustainable energy access and technologies for healthcare facilities in the Global South ⇑ ⇑ Andrea Franco ,1, Marjan Shaker ,1, Dikolela Kalubi, Silvia Hostettler Cooperation & Development Center (CODEV), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Station 10, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland article info abstract Article history: Access to reliable, affordable and sustainable energy is essential for improving living standards, develop- Received 15 October 2016 ment and economic growth. From a healthcare perspective, energy is a critical parameter for delivering Revised 6 February 2017 and improving healthcare services and life-saving interventions in the Global South. This review provides Accepted 28 February 2017 an estimation of the energy needs of different healthcare facilities as a function of patient capacity and Available online xxxx services provided. It also presents the strengths and limitations of several energy sources that can be used to meet these needs. The review focuses on energy provision in off-grid scenarios and for satisfying peak Keywords: demands of grid-connected hospitals. Energy access The initial key observations are that fossil-fuel generators are the main energy source because of their Healthcare facilities Global South low investment costs. However, this technology can no longer compete with the energy produced from Sustainability renewable sources in terms of levelized cost of electricity (LCOE). Photovoltaics (PV) has an LCOE of Renewable energy 0.09 USD/kWh, versus an average 0.25 USD/kWh for diesel generators.
    [Show full text]
  • National Programme for Food Security in the Syrian Arab Republic
    National Programme for Food Security in the Syrian Arab Republic Damascus, August 2010 National Programme for Food Security in the Syrian Arab Republic Acknowledgment The formulation of the National Programme for Food Security in Syria (NPFS) was carried out by a National Team under the coordination of the National Agricultural Policy Center (NAPC) and was funded by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO.)AO The formulation team consisted of the following: Steering Committee, Programme Coordinator, Formulation Committee, Translation Team, National Multidisciplinary Team, and individual consultants. The Steering Committee (SC) is chaired by H.E Dr. Nabi Rasheed Mohamad, Deputy Minister of Agriculture and Agrarian Reform, and is composed of 14 representatives from related Ministries and Directorates. The coordinator of the programme is Mr. Atieh El Hindi, Diretor, NAPC. The Formulation Committee members consists of Mr. Haitham Al Ashkar, Deputy Director-Studies, NAPC and Mr. Usama Al Saadi, Info-Com Division Chief, NAPC. The Translation Team members consists of Mrs. Nawal Nehme, Mr. Hassan Al Mojahed, and Mr. Mahmoud Babili. The National Multidisciplinary Team was composed of six working groups for the NPFS implementation. The Groups include: (i) Safety Nets, headed by Dr. Akram Al-Khouri; (ii) Water Management, headed by Mr. Hussein Makhlouf; (iii) Household Food Security, Livelihood and Nutrition, headed by Mr. Mohamed Zain Al-Din and Dr. Majd Ayoub; (iv) Rural and Agricultural Institutions, headed by Mr. Mohamed Khazma; (v) Crops and Agricultural Production of Small Farmers, headed Mr. Hassan Katana; and (vi) Livestock Production of Small Farmers, headed by Dr. Mohamed Rabie Murstani.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Management Acquires Medical Waste Processing Facility and Business in Phoenix
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Carrie Griffiths (603) 929-3350 [email protected] Waste Management Acquires Medical Waste Processing Facility and Business in Phoenix PHOENIX – June 4, 2010 – WM Healthcare Solutions, Inc., a subsidiary of Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM), today announced that it has acquired a medical waste processing facility and certain other medical waste business assets located in Phoenix, Arizona, from Milum Textile Services Co., a provider of linen services and medical waste collection and treatment services. Terms of the deal were not disclosed. The purchase of the medical waste autoclave facility fits into Waste Management’s strategy to manage solid waste, medical, recycling and pharmaceutical waste for the healthcare industry. The 35,000 square-feet facility today serves approximately 250 licensed healthcare facility customers, employs six people and has the capacity to process 30 tons of medical waste per day. “Our acquisition of Milum’s medical waste autoclave facility is another step forward in growing our medical waste business,” said Mike Archer, general manager of WMHS. “This investment represents an important strategic opportunity to offer disposal options, consulting and cost savings for hospitals, clinics, laboratories, doctors’ offices and a variety of other healthcare businesses in Arizona. Our integrated solutions approach allows us to not only provide safe medical waste treatment and disposal services, but also solid waste, recycling, and construction and demolition materials collection, processing and disposal services to the healthcare industry. The acquisition also adds to our capacity and geographic presence to treat and manage waste from healthcare customers,” Archer said. About Waste Management and WM Healthcare Solutions Waste Management, Inc., based in Houston, Texas, is the leading provider of comprehensive waste management services in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Permanent Mandates Commission
    WSJIAKT [Distributed to the Council C. 144. M. 58. 1926. V. a n d /Ae Members of the League.] G e n e v a , March 8th, 1926. LEAGUE OF NATIONS PERMANENT MANDATES COMMISSION r epo r t t o t h e c o u n c il o f t h e l e a g u e o f n a t io n s ON THE WORK OF THE EIGHTH (EXTRAORDINARY) SESSION OF THE COMMISSION Held in Borne, February 16th-March 6th, 1926. During the course of its extraordinary session held in Rome from February 16th to March 6th, 1926, to consider the situation in Syria, the Permanent Mandates Commission examined the annual report of the mandatory Power for the year 1924 and a provisional report for 1925 (“Rapport provisoire à la Société des Nations sur la situation de la Syrie et du Liban (Année 1925)”), as well as certain petitions, in the presence of the accredited representative of the French Government, M. Robert de Caix, former Secretary-General of the French High Commissariat for Syria and the Lebanon. All the members of the Commission, as well as Mr. H. A. Grimshaw, representative of the International Labour Organisation, were present except M. Beau. At its meeting on the 18th, the Commission heard with great regret of his death on February 16th and desires to pay a tribute to his competence and great ability, expressing at the same time their sorrow and regret at the loss of a dear friend and a valuable collaborator. As the Members of the Council are aware, at M.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex Iii Infection Control and Waste Management Plan
    ANNEX III INFECTION CONTROL AND WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN (ICWMP) FOR KENYA COVID-19 EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROJECT (P173820) UNDER THE COVID-19 STRATEGIC PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE PROGRAM AUGUST, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATION / ACRONYMS............................................................................................ iv 1.0 Introduction........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Context and Components..............................................................................................2 1.2 Targeted Healthcare Facility per project Component............................................................... 2 1.2.1 Component 1. Medical Supplies and Equipment [US$8,472,500 equivalent]......................2 1.2.2 Under Component 3: Quarantine, Isolation and Treatment Centers [US$12,676,400 equivalent].........................................................................................................................................3 1.2.3 Component 4. Medical Waste Management [US$3,387,600 equivalent].............................3 1.2.4 Component 6: Availability of Safe Blood & Blood Products [US$10,000,000 equivalent] 3 1.3 Design Requirement..................................................................................................................4 1.3.1 Laboratory Facilities............................................................................................................. 4 1.3.2 Quarantine / Isolation Rooms
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical & Biological Hygiene Program
    Chemical & Biological Hygiene Program Environmental, Health & Safety Office January 2018 Contents 1. PURPOSE ................................................................................................................................................................... ‐ 1 ‐ 2. OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................................................. ‐ 1 ‐ 3. RESPONSIBILITIES.................................................................................................................................................. ‐ 1 ‐ 4. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES ............................................................................................................ ‐ 2 ‐ 5. LABORATORY CHEMICALS ................................................................................................................................. ‐ 7 ‐ 6. LABORATORY FUME HOODS ............................................................................................................................ ‐ 12 ‐ 7. ELECTRICALLY POWERED LABORATORY APPARATUS ............................................................................ ‐ 13 ‐ 8. SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR PARTICULARLY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES .............................................. ‐ 16 ‐ 9. CHEMICAL DISPOSAL .......................................................................................................................................... ‐ 17 ‐ 10. BIOLOGICAL WASTE ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]