LOK SABHA ___ SYNOPSIS of DEBATES (Proceedings Other Than
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
LOK SABHA ___ SYNOPSIS OF DEBATES (Proceedings other than Questions & Answers) ______ Wednesday, July 27, 2016 / Shravana 5, 1938 (Saka) ______ SUBMISSION BY MEMBER Re: Dope testing in sports THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FARMERS WELFARE AND MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS(SHRI S.S. AHLUWALIA) replying to the issue raised by several hon. Members said: I will apprise the Government regarding the question raised by the hon. Member to make a statement. *MATTERS UNDER RULE 377 (i) SHRI SHARAD TRIPATHI laid a statement regarding need to undertake repair of Khalilabad-Bakhira-Mehdawal road in Sant Kabir Nagar parliamentary constituency, Uttar Pradesh. * Laid on the Table as directed by the hon. Speaker. (ii) SHRI KAMAKHYA PRASAD TASA laid a statement regarding need to provide adequate funds to the Tocklai Tea Research Institute at Jorhat in Assam. (iii) SHRIMATI DARSHANA VIKRAM JARDOSH laid a statement regarding need to conduct proceedings of cases in High Courts in regional languages. (iv) SHRIMATI RAKSHATAI KHADSE laid a statement regarding need to curb illegal sand mining by having a National Policy. (v) SHRI DEVENDRA SINGH BHOLE laid a statement regarding need to probe the shoddy construction work of sewerage and pipe line system under Jawahar Lal Nehru National Urban Renewal System in Kanpur Nagar, Uttar Pradesh. (vi) SHRI RAOSAHEB PATIL DANVE laid a statement regarding need to construct a railway line between Jalgaon and Solapur in Maharashtra. (vii) SHRI JUGAL KISHORE laid a statement regarding need to provide compensation to farmers in Jammu and Kashmir who lost their land due to fencing along the border. (viii) SHRI RAM SWAROOP SHARMA laid a statement regarding need to set up a special group to report on the problems afflicting the hydel sector in Himachal Pradesh. (ix) SHRI BHAIRON PRASAD MISHRA laid a statement regarding need to construct school building for Kendriya Vidyalaya at Chitrakoot, Uttar Pradesh. (x) SHRI SATISH CHANDRA DUBEY laid a statement regarding need to facilitate environmental clearance for construction/development of stretch of National Highway No. 28B passing through Valmiki Nagar parliamentary constituency, Bihar. (xi) SHRI LAXMI NARAYAN YADAV laid a statement regarding need to bring civilian areas of various Cantonments under nearby Corporation or Municipality. (xii) SHRI BHANU PRATAP SINGH VERMA laid a statement regarding need to set up an Agriculture Engineering Institute in Jalaun district of Uttar Pradesh. (xiii) SHRI BHARAT SINGH laid a statement regarding need to provide clean and safe drinking water to people in Ballia parliamentary constituency, Uttar Pradesh. (xiv) DR. KIRIT SOMAIYA laid a statement regarding need to provide land for setting up of a Cancer Research Centre & Hospital at Bhandup in Mumbai. (xv) SHRI SUBHASH CHANDRA BAHERIA laid a statement regarding need to provide broadband connectivity to Post Office, Suwana in Bhilwara parliamentary constituency, Rajasthan. (xvi) SHRI MULLAPPALLY RAMACHANDRAN laid a statement regarding need to provide assistance to Kerala for completing the seawall along its coastline. (xvii) SHRI C. MAHENDRAN laid a statement regarding rejuvenation and replanting of coconut palms in Tamil Nadu. (xviii) SHRI V. PANNEERSELVAM laid a statement regarding expansion of Salem Steel Plant in Tamil Nadu. (xix) SHRI MUTHAMSETTI SRINIVASA RAO laid a statement regarding need to release funds to Government of Andhra Pradesh for the Panchayati Raj Department of the State. (xx) SHRI P. K. BIJU laid a statement regarding need to include Saudi Arabia among those countries which are exempted from bio-metric visas. (xxi) SHRI KAUSHALENDRA KUMAR laid a statement regarding need to grant special category status to Bihar. (xxii) SHRI BADRUDDIN AJMAL laid a statement regarding need to review the decision to handover 12 oilfields to private parties in Assam. (xxiii) SHRI NABA KUMAR SARNIA laid a statement regarding need to address the problems faced by people belonging to Kachari community in Assam to get ST certificate. LOKPAL AND LOKAYUKTAS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2016 THE MINISTER OF STATE OF THE MINISTRY OF DEVELOPMENT OF NORTH EASTERN REGION, MINISTER OF STATE IN THE PRIME MINISTER'S OFFICE, MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS, MINISTER OF STATE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF ATOMIC ENERGY AND MINISTER OF STATE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF SPACE (DR. JITENDRA SINGH) moving the motion for consideration of the Bill said: The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Bill, 2013 became an Act from January 2014. Amendment to the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Bill was brought in the Lok Sabha in December, 2014. Some of the provisions of this Act have created certain issues. This is the declaration of assets by several persons connected with non-government organizations which receive funding from foreign sources or get direct or indirect funding from the State. I propose an amendment in Parliament today in order to substitute the provision of section 44 which precisely deals with the declaration of assets and the provision of making the assets public. This is not the only amendment but the urgency of bringing an amendment pertaining to Section 44 arises from the fact that this has put a binding on us to stick to the deadline of July 31st for filling your assets, including the assets of the spouses and children and also making them public, and, not only the assets of the public servants but also assets of the NGOs. So, in order to overcome that technicality this amendment is being brought in. Of course, there are other amendments which can be taken up later on. SHRI MOHAMMAD SALIM: This is an important Bill and is being discussed in entirety in the standing committee. The government is expecting that the report would come in the next session. How did the government arrive at the conclusion that immediately this one section has to be amended. But it seems that the government is attempting to exempt the public servants from its provisions. Why is the government in a hurry to pass this bill without discussion by keeping the public servants and the members of Parliament out of its purview. SHRI KALYAN BANERJEE: In the Business Advisory Committee meeting we agreed for listing it on Tuesday. But we said we want to have a discussion. But we are not getting opportunity here to discuss it. Only in a very few places there are educational institutions which are doing this charity. It is all right the Bill is being passed without discussion. But for the benefit of the country please do not make any attempt to dilute the Act itself. Simply because an NGO is running a media house and therefore they should be kept beyond the scope of this Act is something which we are opposing. SHRI MALLIKARJUN KHARGE: There can be no two opinions that it is very urgent piece of legislation. The government has brought an amendment but the bill should not be diluted. Hence our request from the government is for clarification on this Bill. DR. JITENDRA SINGH : The Government is not against the Lokpal Bill. The Government is committed to work against corruption and to implement the Lokpal as it is approved by the House. The Government is ready to make it even more stringent if that is the recommendation given to us. The Bill was passed. BENAMI TRANSACTIONS (PROHIBITION) AMENDMENT BILL, 2015 THE MINISTER OF FINANCE AND MINISTER OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS (SHRI ARUN JAITLEY) moving the motion for consideration of the Bill said: Originally the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act was enacted in 1988 and had only nine Sections and any person who wishes to acquire an asset or a property must do it in his own name, with his money. If he acquires it in the name of somebody else, then, it is deemed to be a benami property. Even though two judgements of the Supreme Court came, this law has not been updated and put into effect. Benami transactions are prohibited and the State will have the power to acquire the benami property and that the person who enters into this benami transaction is liable to be prosecuted. When this law was framed, it was thought that everything else would take place by virtue of rules. This Act had to be operationalised through rules, and the rules were never framed. The reason why we want to amend the 1988 Bill because it was considered necessary that the old law be allowed to remain, and the new amendments be inserted into the old law itself. The amendment Bill has 71 Sections because we want the Bill to be operationalised from 1988 onwards. The Standing Committee among others gave a recommendation to lay down as to what are the exceptions to the benami principles. One exception which the law provided for was, properties held within an Undivided Hindu Family. The second amendment was in the event of a Trust, Trustee can hold the property as a fiduciary of the principal Trust. So, those would be exempted. We also considered the issue of properties acquired through power of attorney and that key amendment has been accepted by the Government. The principal object behind this Bill is to discourage benami transactions. It is predominantly an anti-black money measure that any transaction which is benami is illegal and the property is liable to be confiscated. I commend this Bill for discussion and acceptance of the hon. House. SHRI S.P. MUDDAHANUME GOWDA initiating said: Benami transactions are detrimental to the interest of this nation and benami transactions constitute a serious offence against the State also. So, prohibition is needed and prevention is also required equally. We have been hearing much about Indian Black Money in foreign countries. But to our surprise, we have got enormous and sufficient black money on our Indian oil itself.