DOCSLIB.ORG

Staff Report: Amendment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Staff Report: Amendment STATE OF CALIFORNIA -- THE NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SAN DIEGO AREA 7575 METROPOLITAN DRIVE, SUITE 103 SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-4421 (619) 767-2370 W13b Filed: 8/10/19 180th Day: 1/6/20 Staff: C. Hitchens-SD Staff Report: 10/1/19 Hearing Date: 10/16/19 STAFF REPORT: AMENDMENT Application No.: 6-08-110-A3 Applicant: City of Encinitas Agent: Brian Leslie, GHD Location: On the sandy beach at Batiquitos, Beacon’s/Leucadia, Moonlight, and Cardiff Beaches, Encinitas, San Diego County. Original Project Description: Opportunistic Beach Fill Program to capitalize on opportunities to obtain beach-quality sand from upland or dredging projects in the region for placement on Batiquitos and Moonlight Beach. Proposed Amendment: Extend existing program by five years and allow placement activities into spring. Staff Recommendation: Approval with Conditions SUMMARY OF STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of the proposed development with conditions. The primary coastal issues involved with the proposal are potential impacts to public beach access and surfing resources, potential impacts to biological resources, including indirect sedimentation of offshore sensitive marine habitats, direct burial of organisms on the beach and in the nearshore environment, impacts to grunion and shorebirds, and increased turbidity. 6-08-110-A3 (City of Encinitas) The City of Encinitas’ original opportunistic beach replenishment program was approved in August 2009 and allowed for placement of sand for a five year period at two receiver sites within the City - Batiquitos and Moonlight Beaches. The program is designed to capitalize on opportunities to obtain surplus sand from upland construction, development, or dredging projects as they arise, and to place the sand at specific locations on the Encinitas shoreline instead of depositing the material to an inland disposal site. Projects that fall within the program parameters, which include maximum amounts of sand, deposition methods, seasonal placement restrictions, and grain size criteria, can proceed without additional approval from the Commission. Projects which do not meet the standards of the program or projects that raise any additional potential for impacts to coastal resources would require further review and approval by the Commission through a separate CDP or amendment. During the initial five year period of the beach replenishment program (August 2009 through August 2014) the City completed two opportunistic replenishment projects. In August 2014, the permit was amended to extend the permit term for an additional five year period from August 2014 through August 2019, add two additional receiver sites, (Beacon’s Beach and Cardiff Beach), limit the amount and location of material that could be placed at each site, and shorten the time period in which sand could be placed from 8.5 months to 5.5 months (September 15th to February 28th) to avoid prime beach use time and to avoid nesting/spawning of grunion and shore birds and replicate the natural process of sediment delivery to the coast during the fall and winter. The City’s Opportunistic Beach Fill Program was used to approve one project during the prior five- year permit period. The City of Encinitas is now proposing a third five-year time extension of the existing permit, and an extension of placement activities into the spring with the addition of biological monitoring plans. The existing permit allows placement activities between September 15th and February 28th of a given year. The City is requesting to extend the placement period to May 28th to allow for additional flexibility in the receipt of sand sources from construction projects. Because the extended time period would potentially allow some placement during the grunion spawning season, (March 1 to August 31), the western snowy plover breeding season (March 1 to August 31), and California least tern breeding season (April 1 to September 15) the project includes detailed monitoring requirements for grunion and avian monitoring and avoidance. Special Condition 8 requires that for grunion counts, each 300-foot segment be memorialized through multiple GPS coordinates and be marked with irrigation flags. Additionally, Special Condition 8 requires areas of high concentration of grunion and grunion eggs to be avoided, and clarifies that sand placement activities must halt in these highly concentrated areas until and unless a 100-foot buffer on either side of the highly concentrated areas is marked, no work may occur within the 100-foot buffer; and that every individual fish (males and females) shall be counted to determine the Walker Scale value. The condition allows work to commence in areas where grunion haven’t spawned, while avoiding areas where the fish have spawned.. The proposed avian monitoring plan requires monitoring and stopping work are avoiding nesting areas when sensitive bird species are identified. The proposed monitoring plans and requirements have been reviewed by the 2 6-08-110-A3 (City of Encinitas) Commission’s staff ecologist, and recommendations and revisions have been incorporated into the required monitoring plans. Therefore, as conditioned, the proposed project will avoid and minimize impacts to sensitive habitat. 3 6-08-110-A3 (City of Encinitas) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. MOTION AND RESOLUTION ...................................................................... 5 II. SPECIAL CONDITIONS ................................................................................ 5 III. FINDINGS AND DECLARATIONS ............................................................ 10 A. PROJECT HISTORY/ AMENDMENT DESCRIPTION .......................................................... 10 B. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES AND WATER QUALITY ......................................................... 16 C. PUBLIC ACCESS AND RECREATION ............................................................................... 32 D. HAZARDS ..................................................................................................................... 39 E. LOCAL COASTAL PLANNING......................................................................................... 40 F. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ............................................................. 41 APPENDICES Appendix B – Substantive File Documents EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 – Project Location/Receiver Beaches Exhibit 2 – Batiquitos Receiver Site & Access Point Exhibit 3 – Moonlight Receiver Site & Access Point Exhibit 4 – Beacon’s/Leucadia Receiver Site & Access Point Exhibit 5 – Cardiff Receiver Site & Access Point Exhibit 6 – Swami’s State Marine Conservation Area (SMCA) Exhibit 7 – Placement Methods Diagram Exhibit 8 – Dredge Pipeline Corridors Exhibit 9 – Surf Monitoring Camera Locations Exhibit 10 –Walker Scale Graphic 4 6-08-110-A3 (City of Encinitas) I. MOTION AND RESOLUTION Motion: I move that the Commission approve the proposed amendment to Coastal Development Permit Application No. 6-08-110-A3 subject to the conditions set forth in the staff recommendation. Staff recommends a YES vote on the foregoing motion. Passage of this motion will result in conditional approval of the amendment and adoption of the following resolution and findings. The motion passes only by affirmative vote of a majority of the Commissioners present. Resolution: The Commission hereby approves coastal development permit amendment 6-08- 110-A3 and adopts the findings set forth below on grounds that the development as amended and conditioned will be in conformity with the policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act and will not prejudice the ability of the local government having jurisdiction over the area to prepare a Local Coastal Program conforming to the provisions of Chapter 3. Approval of the permit complies with the California Environmental Quality Act because either 1) feasible mitigation measures and/or alternatives have been incorporated to substantially lessen any significant adverse effects of the development on the environment, or 2) there are no further feasible mitigation measures or alternatives that would substantially lessen any significant adverse impacts of the development on the environment. II. SPECIAL CONDITIONS This permit is granted subject to the following special conditions: The following shall be added as new Special Condition 9 to the permit: 9. Grunion Monitoring & Avoidance Plan. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMENDMENT, the applicant shall submit to the Executive Director for review and written approval, a Grunion Monitoring and Avoidance Plan that provides for the following: (a) Should sand placement activities be necessary below the high tide line between March 1 and May 28, the City shall avoid impacts to mature and/or spawning grunion and to grunion eggs. The applicant shall retain the services of a biologist with appropriate qualifications. The annually published California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) expected grunion runs shall be used to determine possible grunion spawning periods. The plan shall, at a minimum, include: 5 6-08-110-A3 (City of Encinitas) i. Sand placement sites shall be monitored for grunion runs beginning at least two weeks prior to commencement of sand placement activities, and throughout the period of planned sand placement work from March 1 through May 28. Monitoring is not necessary in areas where there is no sand, such as areas supporting 100% cobble or bluff backed beaches with no sand exposed during high tide. ii. Grunion monitoring
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Doggin' America's Beaches
    Doggin’ America’s Beaches A Traveler’s Guide To Dog-Friendly Beaches - (and those that aren’t) Doug Gelbert illustrations by Andrew Chesworth Cruden Bay Books There is always something for an active dog to look forward to at the beach... DOGGIN’ AMERICA’S BEACHES Copyright 2007 by Cruden Bay Books All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the Publisher. Cruden Bay Books PO Box 467 Montchanin, DE 19710 www.hikewithyourdog.com International Standard Book Number 978-0-9797074-4-5 “Dogs are our link to paradise...to sit with a dog on a hillside on a glorious afternoon is to be back in Eden, where doing nothing was not boring - it was peace.” - Milan Kundera Ahead On The Trail Your Dog On The Atlantic Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Gulf Of Mexico Beaches 6 Your Dog On The Pacific Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Great Lakes Beaches 0 Also... Tips For Taking Your Dog To The Beach 6 Doggin’ The Chesapeake Bay 4 Introduction It is hard to imagine any place a dog is happier than at a beach. Whether running around on the sand, jumping in the water or just lying in the sun, every dog deserves a day at the beach. But all too often dog owners stopping at a sandy stretch of beach are met with signs designed to make hearts - human and canine alike - droop: NO DOGS ON BEACH.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Encinitas Sea Level Rise Workshop
    City of Encinitas Sea Level Rise Workshop Climate Action Plan May 8, 2018 Crystal Najera, CAP Program Administrator 1 PRESENTATION OVERVIEW How does the City’s Climate Action Plan address Sea Level Rise? 2 Global Climate Change 3 GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE 4 GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE Industrial activities have raised global atmospheric carbon dioxide levels from 280 parts per million to 400 parts per million in the last 150 years. 5 GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE Temperatures will More droughts and continue to rise heat waves The frost-free season (growing season) will Sea level will rise lengthen 1-4 feet by 2100 Change in precipitation Hurricanes will become patterns stronger and more intense 6 Local Climate Change 7 ENCINITAS CLIMATE ACTION PLAN • Mitigation • Adaptation 8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS (2012) 9 LOCAL CLIMATE CHANGE 85 Average Temperature 80 80 78 Average Temperature 75 74 (Avg) Degrees Fahrenheit Degrees 80 70 1950 2005 2050 2099 50 74 Extreme Heat Events 37 40 93F + 30 20 Days per yearper Days 10 4 12 10 Source: Cal-Adapt 0 1960-2005 2090-2099 LOCAL CLIMATE CHANGE Extreme Heat Days (93.3 F or more) 37 12 4 11 Source: Cal-Adapt LOCAL CLIMATE CHANGE 20 18 Annual Rainfall 16 14 14.5 12 10.9 (Avg) 11.1 11.6 10 10.8 Inches 8 6 4 2 0 1950-2005 2050 2099 Fire Risk 12 Source: Cal-Adapt 6 5.5 Sea Level Rise High Emissions Scenario 5 4 3 Feet 2.0 2 Low Emissions Scenario 1.0 1 1.4 0.2 0.4 0 2000 2030 2050 2100 Source: Encinitas Climate Action Plan, 2018; San Diego Coastal Resilience Assessment, 2012 LOCAL CLIMATE CHANGE Sea Level Rise 167 cm (SD high)
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment Iii: Baseline Status and Cumulative Effects for the San Francisco Bay Listed Species
    ATTACHMENT III: BASELINE STATUS AND CUMULATIVE EFFECTS FOR THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY LISTED SPECIES 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1: ALAMEDAWHIPSNAKE ............................................................................................ 6 1.1 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ...................................................................................... 6 1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE........................................................................... 6 1.2.1 Factors affecting species within the action area ............................................... 6 1.2.1.1 Urban development .................................................................................... 7 1.2.1.2 Fire suppression ......................................................................................... 9 1.2.1.3 Predation .................................................................................................... 9 1.2.1.4 Grazing practices ..................................................................................... 10 1.2.1.5 Non-native species ................................................................................... 10 1.2.2 Baseline Status ................................................................................................ 11 1.3 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................... 13 2: BAY CHECKERSPOT BUTTERFLY ....................................................................... 14 2.1 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Pacific Coast Winter Window Survey Results
    2020 Winter Window Survey for Snowy Plovers on U.S. Pacific Coast with 2013-2020 Results for Comparison. Note: blanks indicate no survey was conducted. REGION SITE OWNER 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020 Date Primary Observer(s) Gray's Harbor Copalis Spit State Parks 0 0 0 0 28-Jan C. Sundstrum Conner Creek State Parks 0 0 0 0 28-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis Damon Point WDNR 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum Oyhut Spit WDNR 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum Ocean Shores to Ocean City 4 10 0 9 28-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis County Total 4 10 0 9 Pacific Midway Beach Private, State Parks 22 28 58 66 27-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis Graveyard Spit Shoalwater Indian Tribe 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum, R. Ashley Leadbetter Point NWR USFWS, State Parks 34 3 15 0 11-Feb W. Ritchie South Long Beach Private 6 0 7 0 10-Feb W. Ritchie Benson Beach State Parks 0 0 0 0 20-Jan W. Ritchie County Total 62 31 80 66 Washington Total 66 41 80 75 Clatsop Fort Stevens State Park (Clatsop Spit) ACOE, OPRD 10 19 21 20-Jan T. Pyle, D. Osis DeLaura Beach OPRD No survey Camp Rilea DOD 0 0 0 No survey Sunset Beach OPRD 0 No survey Del Rio Beach OPRD 0 No survey Necanicum Spit OPRD 0 0 0 20-Jan J. Everett, S. Everett Gearhart Beach OPRD 0 No survey Columbia R-Necanicum R. OPRD No survey County Total 0 10 19 21 Tillamook Nehalem Spit OPRD 0 17 26 19-Jan D.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.0 Potential Coastal Receiver Areas
    4.0 POTENTIAL COASTAL RECEIVER AREAS The San Diego shoreline, including the beaches, bluffs, bays, and estuaries, is a significant environmental and recreational resource. It is an integral component of the area’s ecosystem and is interconnected with the nearshore ocean environment, coastal lagoons, wetland habitats, and upstream watersheds. The beaches are also a valuable economic resource and key part of the region’s positive image and overall quality of life. The shoreline consists primarily of narrow beaches backed by steep sea cliffs. In present times, the coastline is erosional except for localized and short-lived accretion due to historic nourishment activities. The beaches and cliffs have been eroding for thousands of years caused by ocean waves and rising sea levels which continue to aggravate this erosion. Episodic and site- specific coastal retreat, such as bluff collapse, is inevitable, although some coastal areas have remained stable for many years. In recent times, this erosion has been accelerated by urban development. The natural supply of sand to the region’s beaches has been significantly diminished by flood control structures, dams, siltation basins, removal of sand and gravel through mining operations, harbor construction, increased wave energy since the late 1970s, and the creation of impervious surfaces associated with urbanization and development. With more development, the region’s beaches will continue to lose more sand and suffer increased erosion, thereby reducing, and possibly eliminating their physical, resource and economic benefits. The State of the Coast Report, San Diego Region (USACE 1991) evaluated the natural and man- made coastal processes within the region. This document stated that during the next 50 years, the San Diego region “…is on a collision course.
    [Show full text]
  • P.L. 94-171 COUNTY BLOCK MAP (2010 CENSUS): San Diego County, CA 117.270098W
    33.107128N 33.105876N 117.34042W P.L. 94-171 COUNTY BLOCK MAP (2010 CENSUS): San Diego County, CA 117.270098W 2040* Avena Ct W C t 2002* 2023 C Seascape Dr Towhee Ln Avena Ct E i 2059* S 3008* n 2004* a n r r T 2056* Butt H Cattail Pl d e a e r n Ponto Dr 3006* cu e e p d R F Ca a 3001* m r a 2022* s t d on l R R i ras W t p Cir 3004* r LEGEND a 4004* 4006* l 3005* urina Ct g i u t o Breakwater Rd al Macadamia Dr o rc e a e S S w h R d n R Strand St n te e n 3001* r Q R Sandbar Way i t r t D t a a u T o u e D t B a u Ave e 2055* k P s l i c h P s e 2050 r c B c a l e a u C t t a d l a t r p l l y Sandcastle Dr e R C us e 3008 P C 3012* P S h r B r l SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL LABEL STYLE m D y C 2025* Coral o m s t i 3009* Waters End Dr u n Lobelia Ct v P r t l s e Conosa 2024 a r e s r ll e ly t i F C n id St Mallee 178.11 W Reef Ave D A o e 4013* s E Way Sweetwater St s Ct l r l 3011 h r 3005* 2012* e B t 3000* a D Federal American Indian s r C e t r r t A l Pso del Norte g T r viara t u i t a Catamaran Dr d P C e e e r u Crane Ct C e L'ANSE RES 1880 S l l M f i Pkwy Reservation o S o 2010 s f a d Tradewinds Dr h i d in R r t O o Brookside C R k i o 2060 4001* V Sage Ct Dr Snapdragon P Blac r r r 2049* r l fb c t 2009 2001 d h R e r C e Raintree l l li Wimbrel Ct i t u id n o Co e a S r L M W m 2017* Dr s T n S o D a e r c l 2054 r gu o r Off-Reservation Trust Land, e Ivy St a 4001* t P g rit e e D r Pl n e L n A r h t m T1880 s m Pl Goldfinch D t Hawaiian Home Land u Way b r r u r e h r N Boxthorn Way Ter o 4012* D v 2008 T A 2051* s
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Coast SNPL 2012 Breeding Survey with WA OR CA
    2012 Summer Window Survey for Snowy Plovers on U.S. Pacific Coast with 2005-2011 Results for Comparison. Note: blanks indicate no survey was conducted. Total Adults 2012 Adult Breakdown REGION SITE OWNER 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 male fem. sex? Grays Harbor Copalis Spit State Parks 00000 00 00 0 Conner Creek State Parks 00000 00 00 0 Damon Point/Oyhut S. Parks, D. Nat R. F & W 500000 00 00 0 County Total 500000 00 00 0 Pacific Midway Beach Private, State Parks 23 25 22 12 16 18 22 11 65 0 Graveyard Shoalwater Indian Tribe 10 0 0 2 11 0 Leadbetter Point NWR USFWS, State Parks 9 42282926201215 10 4 1 South Long Beach Private 00000 County Total 32 67 50 42 42 38 34 28 17 10 1 Washington Total 37 67 50 42 42 38 34 28 17 10 1 Clatsop Fort Stevens State Park (Clatsop Spit) ACOE, OPRD 0 0 0 0 1 00 1 Necanicum Spit OPRD 0000 0 01 00 1 County Total 000000 02 00 2 Tillamook Nehalem Spit OPRD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 Bayocean Spit ACOE 00000 00 00 0 Netarts Spit OPRD 000000 00 00 0 Sand Lake Spit (S) USFS 000000 00 00 0 Nestucca Spit OPRD 0000 0 0 00 0 County Total 000000 00 00 0 Lane Baker Beach/Sutton Creek USFS 0200 1 00 00 0 Sutton Cr./Siuslaw River N Jetty USFS 0 0 0 0 00 0 Siuslaw River S Jetty to Siltcoos USFS 4 40 0 Siltcoos Spits N & S USFS 11 18 16 11 17 18 18 22 11 10 1 County Total 11 20 16 11 17 19 18 26 15 10 1 Douglas Siltcoos-Tahkenitch (Dunes Overlook) USFS 9 2 19 7 6 19 39 42 22 20 0 Tahkenitch Spit N & S USFS 515035132716 11 0 Umpqua River S Jetty to Tenmile Spit USFS 0 11 10 12 57 0 County Total 14 3 24 7 20 24 62 81 43 38 0 Coos Tenmile Spits USFS 13 15 27 24 24 36 13 16 88 0 Coos Bay N Spit BLM, ACOE 27 27 26 30 41 38 39 52 35 17 0 Whiskey Run to Coquille River OPRD 0000 00 00 0 Bandon State Park to New River OPRD, Private, BLM 22 12 15 8 14 40 16 14 95 0 County Total 62 54 68 62 79 114 68 82 52 30 0 Curry New River to Floras Lake BLM, Private, County 13 14 17 25 24 1 20 15 96 0 Blacklock Point to Sixes River (C.
    [Show full text]
  • Tidal Marsh Recovery Plan Habitat Creation Or Enhancement Project Within 5 Miles of OAK
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California California clapper rail Suaeda californica Cirsium hydrophilum Chloropyron molle Salt marsh harvest mouse (Rallus longirostris (California sea-blite) var. hydrophilum ssp. molle (Reithrodontomys obsoletus) (Suisun thistle) (soft bird’s-beak) raviventris) Volume II Appendices Tidal marsh at China Camp State Park. VII. APPENDICES Appendix A Species referred to in this recovery plan……………....…………………….3 Appendix B Recovery Priority Ranking System for Endangered and Threatened Species..........................................................................................................11 Appendix C Species of Concern or Regional Conservation Significance in Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California….......................................13 Appendix D Agencies, organizations, and websites involved with tidal marsh Recovery.................................................................................................... 189 Appendix E Environmental contaminants in San Francisco Bay...................................193 Appendix F Population Persistence Modeling for Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California with Intial Application to California clapper rail …............................................................................209 Appendix G Glossary……………......................................................................………229 Appendix H Summary of Major Public Comments and Service
    [Show full text]
  • Light-Footed Ridgway's (Clapper) Rail in California
    Light-footed Ridgway’s (Clapper) Rail in California 2018 Season By Richard Zembal, Susan M. Hoffman, John Konecny, and Beth Sabiston Final Report to US Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Wildlife Light-footed Ridgway’s (Clapper) Rail in California 2018 Season Richard Zembal, Susan M. Hoffman, John Konecny, and Beth Sabiston Clapper Rail Recovery Fund Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy 24821 Buckboard Lane Laguna Hills, CA 92653 December 21, 2018 Table of Contents ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................... 2 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Population Monitoring .........................................................................................................4 Nest Monitoring ...................................................................................................................5 Breeding in Zoological Facilities .........................................................................................6 Banding and Tracking ..........................................................................................................8 STUDY AREAS ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Declining Biodiversity: Why Species Matter and How Their Functions Might Be Restored in Californian Tidal Marshes
    Features Declining Biodiversity: Why Species Matter and How Their Functions Might Be Restored in Californian Tidal Marshes JOY B. ZEDLER, JOHN C. CALLAWAY, AND GARY SULLIVAN pecies diversity is being lost in habitats that are Sincreasingly diminished by development, fragmenta- BIODIVERSITY WAS DECLINING BEFORE tion, and urban runoff; the sensitive species drop out and a few aggressive ones persist, at the expense of others. Alarmed OUR EYES, BUT IT TOOK REGIONAL by declining biodiversity, many conservationists and re- CENSUSES TO RECOGNIZE THE PROBLEM, searchers are asking what happens to ecosystem functioning if we lose species, how diverse communities can be restored, LONG-TERM MONITORING TO IDENTIFY which (if any) particular species are critical for performing ecosystem services, and which functions are most critical to THE CAUSES, AND EXPERIMENTAL ecosystem sustainability. In southern California, 90% of the coastal wetland area has been destroyed, and remaining wet- PLANTINGS TO SHOW WHY THE LOSS OF lands continue to be damaged; even the region’s protected re- SPECIES MATTERS AND WHICH RESTORA- serves are threatened by highway and utility-expansion pro- jects. The fate of biodiversity in these diminished wetlands TION STRATEGIES MIGHT REESTABLISH serves to warn other regions of the need for continual as- sessment of the status and function of both common and rare SPECIES species, as well as the need for experimental tests of their importance—before they are lost. This article synthesizes data for tidal marshes of the Cali- fornian biogeographic region, which stretches from Point Conception near Santa Barbara south to Bahía San Quintín Joy B. Zedler, Aldo Leopold Chair of Restoration Ecology, Botany De- in Baja California.
    [Show full text]
  • California Rare & Endagered Birds
    California brown pelican Pelecanus occidentalis californicus State Endangered 1971 Fully Protected Federal Endangered 1970 General Habitat: The California brown pelican uses a variety of natural and human-created sites, including offshore islands and rocks, sand spits, sand bars, jetties, and piers, for daytime loafing and nocturnal roosting. Preferred nesting sites provide protection from mammalian predators and sufficient elevation to prevent flooding of nests. The pelican builds a nest of sticks on the ground, typically on islands or offshore rocks. Their nesting range extends from West Anacapa Island and Santa Barbara Island in Channel Islands National Park to Islas Los Coronados, immediately south of and offshore from San Diego, and Isla San Martín in Baja California Norte, Mexico. Description: The brown pelican is one of two species of pelican in North America; the other is the white pelican. The California brown pelican is a large, grayish-brown bird with a long, pouched bill. The adult has a white head and dark body, but immature birds are dark with a white belly. The brown pelican weighs up to eight pounds and may have a wingspan of seven feet. Brown pelicans dive from flight to capture surface-schooling marine fishes. Status: The California brown pelican currently nests on West Anacapa Island and Santa Barbara Island in Channel Islands National Park. West Anacapa Island is the largest breeding population of California. In Mexico, the pelicans nest on Islas Los Coronados and Isla San Martín. Historically, the brown pelican colony on Islas Los Coronados was as large as, or larger than, that of recent years on Anacapa Island.
    [Show full text]
  • From British Columbia to Baja California Restoring the Olympia Oyster (Ostrea Lurida)
    From British Columbia to Baja California Restoring The Olympia Oyster (Ostrea lurida) Report of a Forum Sponsored by American Honda Motor Corporation Aquarium of the Pacific Bren School of the University of California, Santa Barbara 16-17 March 2017 Acknowledgements We thank the Bren Oyster Group, all of the other presenters, and those who authored sections of this report. We thank the Bren students for acting as rapporteurs and for their excellent notes. We also thank Linda Brown for handling the logistics from start to finish and for helping assemble the sections of this report. We also thank Linda Brown and Claire Atkinson for editing the report. Jerry R. Schubel, Aquarium of the Pacific Steven Center, American Honda Motor Co., Inc. Hunter Lenihan, UC Santa Barbara This report can be found at: http://www.aquariumofpacific.org/mcri/info/restoring_the_olympia_oyster/forums 2 Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 5 Insights from the forum ......................................................................................................... 9 Action Items ....................................................................................................................... 11 Planning and Incentivizing Native Olympia Oyster Restoration in SoCal ........................... 13 Restoration of Native Oysters in San Francisco Bay .......................................................... 21 Restoration of Native Oysters in
    [Show full text]