Arachnologische Mitteilungen
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Checklist of the Non -Acarine Arachnids
Original Research A CHECKLIST OF THE NON -A C A RINE A R A CHNIDS (CHELICER A T A : AR A CHNID A ) OF THE DE HOOP NA TURE RESERVE , WESTERN CA PE PROVINCE , SOUTH AFRIC A Authors: ABSTRACT Charles R. Haddad1 As part of the South African National Survey of Arachnida (SANSA) in conserved areas, arachnids Ansie S. Dippenaar- were collected in the De Hoop Nature Reserve in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. The Schoeman2 survey was carried out between 1999 and 2007, and consisted of five intensive surveys between Affiliations: two and 12 days in duration. Arachnids were sampled in five broad habitat types, namely fynbos, 1Department of Zoology & wetlands, i.e. De Hoop Vlei, Eucalyptus plantations at Potberg and Cupido’s Kraal, coastal dunes Entomology University of near Koppie Alleen and the intertidal zone at Koppie Alleen. A total of 274 species representing the Free State, five orders, 65 families and 191 determined genera were collected, of which spiders (Araneae) South Africa were the dominant taxon (252 spp., 174 genera, 53 families). The most species rich families collected were the Salticidae (32 spp.), Thomisidae (26 spp.), Gnaphosidae (21 spp.), Araneidae (18 2 Biosystematics: spp.), Theridiidae (16 spp.) and Corinnidae (15 spp.). Notes are provided on the most commonly Arachnology collected arachnids in each habitat. ARC - Plant Protection Research Institute Conservation implications: This study provides valuable baseline data on arachnids conserved South Africa in De Hoop Nature Reserve, which can be used for future assessments of habitat transformation, 2Department of Zoology & alien invasive species and climate change on arachnid biodiversity. -
Oak Woodland Litter Spiders James Steffen Chicago Botanic Garden
Oak Woodland Litter Spiders James Steffen Chicago Botanic Garden George Retseck Objectives • Learn about Spiders as Animals • Learn to recognize common spiders to family • Learn about spider ecology • Learn to Collect and Preserve Spiders Kingdom - Animalia Phylum - Arthropoda Subphyla - Mandibulata Chelicerata Class - Arachnida Orders - Acari Opiliones Pseudoscorpiones Araneae Spiders Arachnids of Illinois • Order Acari: Mites and Ticks • Order Opiliones: Harvestmen • Order Pseudoscorpiones: Pseudoscorpions • Order Araneae: Spiders! Acari - Soil Mites Characteriscs of Spiders • Usually four pairs of simple eyes although some species may have less • Six pair of appendages: one pair of fangs (instead of mandibles), one pair of pedipalps, and four pair of walking legs • Spinnerets at the end of the abdomen, which are used for spinning silk threads for a variety of purposes, such as the construction of webs, snares, and retreats in which to live or to wrap prey • 1 pair of sensory palps (often much larger in males) between the first pair of legs and the chelicerae used for sperm transfer, prey manipulation, and detection of smells and vibrations • 1 to 2 pairs of book-lungs on the underside of abdomen • Primitively, 2 body regions: Cephalothorax, Abdomen Spider Life Cycle • Eggs in batches (egg sacs) • Hatch inside the egg sac • molt to spiderlings which leave from the egg sac • grows during several more molts (instars) • at final molt, becomes adult – Some long-lived mygalomorphs (tarantulas) molt after adulthood Phenology • Most temperate -
196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 a Revised Checklist of the Spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection Criteria and Lists
196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 A revised checklist of the spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection criteria and lists Alastair Lavery The checklist has two main sections; List A contains all Burach, Carnbo, species proved or suspected to be established and List B Kinross, KY13 0NX species recorded only in specific circumstances. email: [email protected] The criterion for inclusion in list A is evidence that self- sustaining populations of the species are established within Great Britain and Ireland. This is taken to include records Abstract from the same site over a number of years or from a number A revised checklist of spider species found in Great Britain and of sites. Species not recorded after 1919, one hundred years Ireland is presented together with their national distributions, before the publication of this list, are not included, though national and international conservation statuses and syn- this has not been applied strictly for Irish species because of onymies. The list allows users to access the sources most often substantially lower recording levels. used in studying spiders on the archipelago. The list does not differentiate between species naturally Keywords: Araneae • Europe occurring and those that have established with human assis- tance; in practice this can be very difficult to determine. Introduction List A: species established in natural or semi-natural A checklist can have multiple purposes. Its primary pur- habitats pose is to provide an up-to-date list of the species found in the geographical area and, as in this case, to major divisions The main species list, List A1, includes all species found within that area. -
SA Spider Checklist
REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 22(2): 2551-2597 CHECKLIST OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) OF SOUTH ASIA INCLUDING THE 2006 UPDATE OF INDIAN SPIDER CHECKLIST Manju Siliwal 1 and Sanjay Molur 2,3 1,2 Wildlife Information & Liaison Development (WILD) Society, 3 Zoo Outreach Organisation (ZOO) 29-1, Bharathi Colony, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT Thesaurus, (Vol. 1) in 1734 (Smith, 2001). Most of the spiders After one year since publication of the Indian Checklist, this is described during the British period from South Asia were by an attempt to provide a comprehensive checklist of spiders of foreigners based on the specimens deposited in different South Asia with eight countries - Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The European Museums. Indian checklist is also updated for 2006. The South Asian While the Indian checklist (Siliwal et al., 2005) is more spider list is also compiled following The World Spider Catalog accurate, the South Asian spider checklist is not critically by Platnick and other peer-reviewed publications since the last scrutinized due to lack of complete literature, but it gives an update. In total, 2299 species of spiders in 67 families have overview of species found in various South Asian countries, been reported from South Asia. There are 39 species included in this regions checklist that are not listed in the World Catalog gives the endemism of species and forms a basis for careful of Spiders. Taxonomic verification is recommended for 51 species. and participatory work by arachnologists in the region. -
Gattungen Arctosa, Tricca, Trochosa (Arachnida, Araneida: Lycosidae) - Faunistisch-Tiergeographische Übersicht Von Jan Buchar Und Konrad THALER Mit 6 Abbildungen
©Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein für Kärnten, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Carinthia II 185./1O5. Jahrgang S. 481-498 Klagenfurt 1995 Die Wolfspinnen von Österreich 2: Gattungen Arctosa, Tricca, Trochosa (Arachnida, Araneida: Lycosidae) - Faunistisch-tiergeographische Übersicht Von Jan BucHAR und Konrad THALER Mit 6 Abbildungen Kurzfassung: Mit der Darstellung der Gattungen Arctosa, Tricca und Trochosa setzen wir die Besprechung der Lycosidae von Österreich besonders auf Grund der seit 1955 erarbeiteten Befunde fort. Die 3 Gattungen sind mit insgesamt 12 (7+1+4) „sicher" nachgewiesenen Arten vertreten, dazu kommen eine Unterart (A. alpigena lamperti) und eine nur aus einer alten Aufsammlung unsicher beleg- te Spezies (A. variana). Anhangweise behandelt sind 5 weitere Arten von Arctosa, Hygrolycosa, Trochosa, die teils am N-Rand der Alpen, teils in den Südalpen vorkommen und deren Auftreten im Bundesge- biet verschiedene Wahrscheinlichkeit zukommt. Seit 1955 wurden für Österreich neu genannt: A. a. lamperti, A. renidescens n. sp. (= A. renidens auct., nee SIMON), A. stigmosa, A. variana. Die im Zusammen- hang mit A. a. lamperti und A. renidescens n. sp. stehenden taxonomischen Probleme werden besprochen. Arealschwankungen, Bestandessituation: Lediglich zwei weitverbreitete Trochosa-Arten (T. ruricola, T. terricola) sind in der Agrarlandschaft allgemein verbreitet, regional treten rezedent 4 weitere Formen hinzu. Arctosa-Arten sind mit 1 Ausnahme auf naturnahe Habitate beschränkt und überwiegend selten bis sehr selten, Habitate sind Flußufer (A. cinerea, A. stigmosa, A. variana), Moore (A. a. lamperti), Bachufer, Felsenheide, Zwergstrauchheide und die alpine Stufe. Folgende Verbreitungstypen sind ver- treten (in Klammern die jeweilige Artenzahl): alpin-endemisch (1), arktoalpin verbreitet (1), extrame- diterran (4+?2), mediterran-expansiv (1), paläarktisch (3), holarktisch (1). -
Ekologie Pavouků a Sekáčů Na Specifických Biotopech V Lesích
UNIVERZITA PALACKÉHO V OLOMOUCI Přírodovědecká fakulta Katedra ekologie a životního prostředí Ekologie pavouků a sekáčů na specifických biotopech v lesích Ondřej Machač DOKTORSKÁ DISERTAČNÍ PRÁCE Školitel: doc. RNDr. Mgr. Ivan Hadrián Tuf, Ph.D. Olomouc 2021 Prohlašuji, že jsem doktorskou práci sepsal sám s využitím mých vlastních či spoluautorských výsledků. ………………………………… © Ondřej Machač, 2021 Machač O. (2021): Ekologie pavouků a sekáčů na specifických biotopech v lesích s[doktorská di ertační práce]. Univerzita Palackého, Přírodovědecká fakulta, Katedra ekologie a životního prostředí, Olomouc, 35 s., v češtině. ABSTRAKT Pavoukovci jsou ekologicky velmi různorodou skupinou, obývají téměř všechny biotopy a často jsou specializovaní na specifický biotop nebo dokonce mikrobiotop. Mezi specifické biotopy patří také kmeny a dutiny stromů, ptačí budky a biotopy ovlivněné hnízděním kormoránů. Ve své dizertační práci jsem se zabýval ekologií společenstev pavouků a sekáčů na těchto specifických biotopech. V první studii jsme se zabývali společenstvy pavouků a sekáčů na kmenech stromů na dvou odlišných biotopech, v lužním lese a v městské zeleni. Zabývali jsme se také jednotlivými společenstvy na kmenech různých druhů stromů a srovnáním tří jednoduchých sběrných metod – upravené padací pasti, lepového a kartonového pásu. Ve druhé studii jsme se zabývali arachnofaunou dutin starých dubů za pomocí dvou sběrných metod (padací past v dutině a nárazová past u otvoru dutiny) na stromech v lužním lese a solitérních stromech na loukách a také srovnáním společenstev v dutinách na živých a odumřelých stromech. Ve třetí studii jsme se zabývali společenstvem pavouků zimujících v ptačích budkách v nížinném lužním lese a vlivem vybraných faktorů prostředí na jejich početnosti. Zabývali jsme se také znovuosídlováním ptačích budek pavouky v průběhu zimy v závislosti na teplotě a vlivem hnízdního materiálu v budce na početnosti a druhové spektrum pavouků. -
Nocturnal Activity of Trochosa Rvricola (Degeer) and T
Commun. Fac. Sci. üniv. Ank. Series C V. 13. pp. 1-11 (1995) NOCTURNAL ACTİVİTY OF TROCHOSA RVRICOLA (DEGEER) AND T. terricola THORELL (LYCOSİDAE, ARANEAE) SAMP- LED BY THE TIME-SORTING PİTFALL TRAP ABDULLAH BAYRAM Department of Biology^ Faculty of Art and Science^ University of Yüzüncü Yıl, Van, Turkey Received Dec. 28, 1994: Revised Feb. 7, 1995; Accepted March 1, 1995 ABSTRACT In this study, diel activity of Trochosa ruricola (Degeer) and T. terricola Thorell (Lycosidae Araneae) was determined using the time-sorting pitfall trap in grasslands and fields in northe- ast England. In spite of capture of Trochosa ruricola and T. terricola during day-time and night, most were caught during the dark periods. The ratio of adults of T. ruricola caught during the dark periods to the light periods was 1 / 0.28 in the field, and 1 / 0.23 in the grassland. For T. terricola, the same ratio was 1 / 0.17 in the field, and it was 11 0.26 lycosid in the grassland. Aınong the dark periods, much activity was recorded during the sunset and evening periods for the species. Littie activity was recorded during the sunrise and morning periods. While the adults were nocturnal, the immatures of Trochosa were found as diurnal. In addition, T. ruri cola was more active in the field while T. terricola was more active in the grassland. INTRODUCTION Wolf spiders are important predators of insects and some other arthropods in agricultural environments such as crop fields and grass- lands. In many ecological studies, wolf spiders formed a very important proportion of the fauna (Yeargan et al. -
Landscape-Scale Connections Between the Land Use, Habitat Quality and Ecosystem Goods and Services in the Mureç/Maros Valley
TISCIA monograph series Landscape-scale connections between the land use, habitat quality and ecosystem goods and services in the Mureç/Maros valley Edited by László Körmöczi Szeged-Arad 2012 Two countries, one goal, joint success! Hungary-Romania European Union Cross-Border Co-operation European Regional Development Fund Programme 2007-2013 Landscape-scale connections between the land use, habitat quality and ecosystem goods and services in the Mureç/Maros valley TISCIA monograph series 1. J. Hamar and A. Sárkány-Kiss (eds.): The Maros/Mure§ River Valley. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1995. 2. A. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): The Cri§/Kórós Rivers' Valleys. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1997. 3. A. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): The Some§/Szamos River Valleys. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1999. 4. J. Hamar and A. Sárkány-Kiss (eds.): The Upper Tisa Valley. Preparatory Proposal for Ramsar Site Designation and an Ecological Background, 1999. 5. L. Gallé and L. Kórmóczi (eds.): Ecology of River Valleys, 2000. 6. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): Ecological Aspects of the Tisa River Basin, 2002. 7. L. Gallé (ed.): Vegetation and Fauna of Tisza River Basin, I. 2005. 8. L. Gallé (ed.): Vegetation and Fauna of Tisza River Basin, II. 2008. 9. L. Kórmóczi (ed.): Ecological and socio-economic relations in the valleys of river K6ros/Cri§ and river Maros/Mure§, 2011. 10. L. Kórmóczi (ed.): Landscape-scale connections between the land use, habitat quality and ecosystem goods and services in the Mure§/Maros valley, 2012. -
Bemerkenswerte Spinnen Aus Südost-Österreich I (Arachnida: Araneae)
©Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein für Kärnten, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Carinthia II M 190/110. Jahrgang M Seiten 343-380 M Klagenfurt 2000 343 Bemerkenswerte Spinnen aus Südost-Österreich I (Arachnida: Araneae) Von Christian KOMPOSCH Zusammenfassung: Aus Kärnten und der Steiermark werden 85 bemerkenswerte oder selten gefundene Spinnenarten mitgeteilt und das Vorkommen kurz disku- tiert. Diplocephalus dentatus Tullgren, 1955 ist neu für Österreich. Neben Pityohyphantes phrygianus [C.l. Koch, 1836) und Scotophaeus quadripunc- tatus (Linne, 1758) werden für 45 Erstnachweise aus Kärnten, die bereits in der Checklist Kärntens (KOMPOSCH & STEINBERGER 1999) angeführt sind, die genauen Funddaten mitgeteilt: Scytodes thoracica (Latreille, 1802), Pholcus phalangioides (Fuesslin, 1775), Uloborus walckenaerius (Latreille, 1806), Achaearanea riparia (Blackwall, 1834), Dipoena prona (Menge, 1868), Robertus neglectus(Q. P.-Cambridge, 1871), Asthenargus paganus (Simon, 1884), Diplocephalus protuberans (0. P.-Cambridge, 1875), Donacochara Abb. 1: Die Kräuselradnetzspinne Uloborus walckenaerius, im Bild ein Weib- chen mit Kokon, ist durch ihre dich- te und filzige Behaarung zwischen den hellen Kalkfelsen perfekt getarnt; sie ist ein kryptischer Bewohner von trockenwarmen Blockhalden und Felsstandorten. Im Gegensatz zu allen übrigen Spinnen besitzen die Vertreter der Familie Uloboridae keine Giftdrüsen. (Foto: Ch. Komposch) ©Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein für Kärnten, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at 344 Komposch: Spinnen aus Südost-Österreich speciosa (Thoreil, 1875), Frontinellina frutetorum (C. L. Koch, 1834), Gongyli- diellum murcidum Simon, 1884, Hilaira excisa (0. P.-Cambridge, 1871), Labulla thoracica (Wider, 1834), Macrargus carpenteri (0. P.-Cambridge, 1894), Metopobactrus prominulus (0. P.-Cambridge, 1872), Micrargus alpi- nus Relys & Weiss, 1997, Microctenonyx subitaneus (0. P.-Cambridge, 1875), Oedothorax agrestis (Blackwall, 1853), Poeciloneta variegata (Black- wall, 1841), Porrhomma convexum (Westring, 1851), Scotinotylus evansi(0. -
Protection of Biodiversity in the Risk Management
TEXTE 76 /2015 Protection of Biodiversity in the Risk Assessment and Risk Management of Pesticides (Plant Protection Products & Biocides) with a Focus on Arthropods, Soil Organisms and Amphibians TEXTE 76/2015 Environmental Research of the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety Project No. (FKZ) 3709 65 421 Report No. (UBA-FB) 002175/E Protection of Biodiversity in the Risk Assessment and Risk Management of Pesticides (Plant Protection Products & Biocides) with a Focus on Arthropods, Soil Organisms and Amphibians by Carsten A. Brühl, Annika Alscher, Melanie Hahn Institut für Umweltwissenschaften , Universität Koblenz-Landau, Landau, Germany Gert Berger, Claudia Bethwell, Frieder Graef Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF) e.V., Müncheberg, Germany Thomas Schmidt, Brigitte Weber Harlan Laboratories, Ittingen, Switzerland On behalf of the Federal Environment Agency (Germany) Imprint Publisher: Umweltbundesamt Wörlitzer Platz 1 06844 Dessau-Roßlau Tel: +49 340-2103-0 Fax: +49 340-2103-2285 [email protected] Internet: www.umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt Study performed by: Institut für Umweltwissenschaften, Universität Koblenz-Landau Fortstr. 7 76829 Landau, Germany Study completed in: August 2013 Edited by: Section IV 1.3 Plant Protection Products Dr. Silvia Pieper Publication as pdf: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/protection-of-biodiversity-in-the-risk-assessment ISSN 1862-4804 Dessau-Roßlau, September 2015 The Project underlying this report was supported with funding from the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear safety under project number FKZ 3709 65 421. The responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the author(s). Table of Contents Table of Contents 1. -
Plants & Ecology
Beachcombers, landlubbers and able seemen Effects of marine subsidies on roles of arthropod predators in coastal food webs by Kajsa Mellbrand Plants & Ecology Plant Ecology 2007/7 Department of Botany Stockholm University Beachcombers, landlubbers and able seemen Effects of marine subsidies on roles of arthropod predators in coastal food webs Licentiate thesis by Kajsa Mellbrand Supervisor: Peter Hambäck Plants & Ecology Plant Ecology 2007/7 Department of Botany Stockholm University Plants & Ecology Plant Ecology Department of Botany Stockholm University S-106 91 Stockholm Sweden © Plant Ecology ISSN 1651-9248 Printed by Solna Printcenter Cover: A coastal orb web weaving spider, Larinioides cornutus. Photo by Kajsa Mellbrand Abstract This licentiate thesis is a part of a PhD project aimed at understanding how inflows of marine nutrients affect structure and function of receptor ecosystems in coastal areas of the Baltic Sea. This thesis examines which coastal arthropod predators utilize marine inflows and how inflows affect the roles of predators in the coastal food web. The marine inflows consist of marine algae (mainly green filamentous algae) and emerging phantom midges (Chironomidae) with marine larval stages. The predators included in the thesis are spiders (the most common and abundant predators in the study system) and predatory insects such as nabids, saldids, carabids and Staphylinids. The thesis includes two manuscripts. To examine to what extent coastal arthropods utilize nutrients of marine origin, analyses of carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratios (13C/12C and 15N/14N) were made of arthropods, plants and algae collected on shores.: In the first, a bottom-up food web is constructed based on carbon sources of coastal arthropods, in the second the possibility of top-down effects in the coastal food web is examined. -
Wsn 47(2) (2016) 298-317 Eissn 2392-2192
Available online at www.worldscientificnews.com WSN 47(2) (2016) 298-317 EISSN 2392-2192 Indian Lycosoidea Sundevall (Araneae: Opisthothelae: Araneomorphae) in Different States and Union Territories Including an Annotated Checklist Dhruba Chandra Dhali1,*, P. M. Sureshan1, Kailash Chandra2 1Zoological Survey of India, Western Ghat Regional Centre, Kozkhikore - 673006, India 2Zoological Survey of India, M- Block, New Alipore, Kolkata - 700053, India *E-mail address: [email protected] ABSTRACT Annotated checklist of Lycosoidea so far recorded from different states and union territories of India reveals a total of 251 species under 38 genera belonging five families. The review cleared that diversity of lycosoid spider fauna is maximum in West Bengal followed by Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and they are not distributed maximally in the states and union territories within Biodiversity hotspots. This fauna is distributed all over the country. There is nearly 69.35% endemism (in context of India). Keywords: Distribution; Lycosoidea; India; State; Union Territories; Annotated; checklist 1. INTRODUCTION Spiders, composing the order Araneae Clerck, 1757 is the largest group among arachnids and separated into two suborders: Mesothelae Pocock, 1892 (segmented spiders) World Scientific News 47(2) (2016) 298-317 and Opisthothelae Pocock, 1892 (includes all other spiders). Later one is further divided into two infraorders: Mygalomorphae Pocock, 1892 (ancient' spiders) and Araneomorphae Smith, 1902 (modern' spiders include the vast majority of spiders) (Coddington, 2005; WSC, 2015). Araneomorphae composed of 99 families and most of them can be divided into at least six clades and 11 super-families, though some are still unplaced in that system (Zhang, 2011).