DOCSLIB.ORG

Brotherhood & Unity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Brotherhood & Unity Brotherhood & Unity La Guerra en Bosnia y Herzegovina 1992-1995 Un Juego de Tomislav Čipčić Una traducción de Manuel Suffo 1.0 Introducción 3 cartas de ayuda del jugador 1 manual de reglas Brotherhood & Unity: La Guerra en Bosnia y Herzego- 3 dados de diez caras vina 1992-1995 es un juego de guerra dirigido por car- ta para 2-3 jugadores. Representa la guerra más re- 1 caja y su tapa. ciente y sangrienta en Europa desde la IIGM. 1.2 Mapa Brotherhood & Unity (Fraternidad y Unidad: Bratstvo 1.2.1 Geografía: el mapa muestra Bosnia y Herzego- i jedinstvo) era una doctrina yugoslava con el vina en el estallido de la guerra. Es un país en Europa propósito de crear una fuerte unión entre las suroriental, fronteriza con Croacia al oeste y con Yu- naciones de Yugoslavia. Puesto que Yugoslavia era goslavia al este. Sarajevo es la capital y la ciudad más un país étnicamente diverso (con 7 naciones grande, mientras que las otras ciudades importantes principales, y muchos pequeños grupos étnicos) – son Banja Luka, Bijeljina, Tuzla, Zenica y Mostar. era una manera de crear una identidad unitaria yugoslava y socialista. “Protege la fraternidad y la unidad como la niña de tus ojos” – Josip Broz Tito, Mariscal de Yugoslavia. Bosnia y Herzegovina (Bosna i Hercegovina, o BiH en abrevio) es un país multiétnico, que consta de tres grupos étnicos principales: bosnios, serbios y croatas. Ninguno de ellos tiene una mayoría abrumadoras, por eso la historia del país es una historia de conflictos y compromisos. La guerra duró desde 1992 a 1995, y fue principalmente una guerra civil entre los tres grupos étnicos locales. Pero también incluyó a varias fuerzas 1.2.2 Símbolos y Colores: cada bando está repre- extranjeras: formaciones paramilitares serbias desde sentado por sus símbolos y colores. Son estos: Yugoslavia y Krajina, fuerzas armadas de Croacia, y la OTAN. En el juego, los jugadores usarán unidades militares, y diferentes eventos políticos, diplomáticos y estratégicos para lograr la victoria. Para ganar, 1.2.3 Espacios: los espacios son tendrán que equilibrar satisfactoriamente las ubicaciones en el mapa que represen- acciones militares con las potencias extranjeras, y la tas ciudades, pueblos, y puntos estra- voluntad de su pueblo para luchar. tégicos. Estos espacios se usan para poner unidades y marcadores. Cada Las reglas son principalmente las mismas para las espacio está bajo control de uno de partidas de 2 y 3 jugadores. Para las partidas de 2 los jugadores, y se considera “amigo” jugadores se añaden las reglas de 14.0 Partidas de a ese jugador. Dos Jugadores. 1.2.4 Espacios Clave: éstos represen- tan las importantes áreas estratégicas 1.1 Componentes del Juego dentro de una región. Deben ser captu- 1 mapa de 56 x 86 cm radas para ganar el control de una re- 260 fichas gión, y también sirven como Fuentes de 96 cartas de estrategia (en 3 mazos: serbio, croata Abastecimiento limitado y ubicaciones y bosnio) de refuerzo. Brotherhood & Unity 2 1.2.5 Espacios Extranjeros: los espacios en los países y regiones ve- cinas (Croacia, Yugoslavia, y Kraji- na) son Espacios Extranjeros. Se usan como puntos de entrada para las Unidades Extranjeras, como Fuentes de Abastecimiento, y rutas de suministros. Las Unidades Domésticas no pueden entrar en esos espacios, excepto cuando necesiten re- tirarse. Las unidades croatas y bosnias pueden usar los espacios de Croacia (CRO), mientras que las uni- dades serbias pueden usar los espacios de Krajina (KRA) y Yugoslavia (YUG). Sólo los espacios con la misma designación están relacionados como conec- tados (EJEMPLO: los espacios de Krajina están conec- tados a otros espacios de Krajina). NOTA DEL DISEÑADOR: se mantuvieron fuerzas significativas en el área de Sarajevo durante la gue- 1.2.6 Marcadores de Colocación rra. Las fuerzas bosnias intentaron continuamente Inicial de Unidades: algunos símbo- acabar con el asedio de su capital, mientras que los los de espacio. Éstos son ubicaciones de serbios la usaron como una ficha de canje durante colocación inicial de unidades. Cuando las negociaciones de paz. Por eso la ciudad y sus ba- se hace la preparación inicial del juego, rrios están representados en detalle dentro del juego. los jugadores ponen sus unidades en estos espacios. 1.2.7 Carreteras: los espacios están conectados 1.2.10 Recuadros de Región: por carreteras, que se muestran como líneas en el el mapa está dividido en regiones mapa. Las unidades usan las carreteras cuando mue- por las que luchan los jugadores. ven de espacio a espacio, y como rutas de suminis- Cada región está controlada por tros. Dos espacios conectados por una carretera se uno de los jugadores, que se indica consideran “adyacentes”. con la colocación de un marcador en un Recuadro de Región (véase 1.2.8 Terreno: cada espacio tiene uno de estos ti- 13.5.4 Chequeo de Control de Región). pos de terreno: Despejado, Montaña, Pantano, Ciu- dad o Río. El terreno afecta al combate como sigue 1.2.11 Registros y Recuadros: el juego tiene varios (véase 13.4 Ataque): registros utilizados para mostrar información impor- tante del juego. Éstos son: DRM – Modificador de penalización (atacante o defensor) Registro de Turno/Secuencia de Juego – mues- No Ret – Opción de No Retirarse (defensor) tra los detalles del turno, y la secuencia de juego. Detener – Detiene el avance después del ataque Registro de Actitud Extranjera – muestra los (atacante) puntos de la Actitud Extranjera para cada jugador. Def 1º/f - Defensor es primero en abrir fuego. Registro de Voluntad Estratégica – muestra los puntos de Voluntad Estratégica para cada jugador. TIPO DRM No Ret. Det. Unidades Bosnias Eliminadas – recuadro para poner las unidades bosnias eliminadas. Despejado - - - Unidades Croatas Eliminadas – recuadro para Montaña Atq-2 poner las unidades croatas eliminadas. Unidades Serbias Eliminadas – recuadro para Pantano Atq-2 poner las unidades serbias eliminadas Ciudad Atq-4 - Unidades Croatas Extranjeras – recuadro para poner las Unidades Croatas Extranjeras (en reserva Trinchera Atq-2, Def+2 - y eliminadas). Río Def 1º/f, Atq-4 - Unidades Serbias Extranjeras – recuadro para poner las Unidades Serbias Extranjeras (en reserva 1.2.9 Mapa de Sarajevo: la ciudad de Sarajevo es y eliminadas). la capital y el área urbana más grande dentro de BiH, con una población de más de medio millón de habi- 1.3 Unidades tantes. Está representada en detalle con un mapa in- 1.3.1 Tipos de Unidades: las unidades son piezas serto que muestra las áreas y barrios clave dentro de del juego que representan unidades militares de tama- la ciudad. ño brigada (unos 1500-2000 soldados). Se dividen en: Brotherhood & Unity 3 Unidades: (estándar/domésticas) – unidades de Bajas del defensor para dañar a la unidad defensora. principales, nativos de BiH. Factor de Movimiento (FM): el número de espacios unidades de países y re- Unidades Extranjeras – que una unidad puede mover. giones extranjeras. Unidades de Élite: este símbolo señala a las unidades 1.3.2 Unidades: éstas son Unidades Domésticas de de élite. Tienen mayores valores de unidad, y avanzan Bosnia y Herzegovina. Sólo pueden moverse dentro después del ataque 1 espacio extra (Avance d/a +1 es- de BiH. Pueden atacar a Espacios Extranjeros, pero pacio). no tienen permitido avanzar a ellos. Sin embargo, tienen permitido atravesar, con Recolocación Estra- NOTA DEL DISEÑADOR: en esta guerra hubo 2 ti- tégica, y retirarse a Espacios Extranjeros amigos. Es- pos básicos de unidades: regular (creadas por reser- tas unidades son: vistas civiles), y profesionales (formadas por solda- ARBIH Bosnias – Ejército de la República de BiH dos profesionales). Las profesionales estaban equi- padas con el mejor equipo, tanques, transporte mo- HVO Croatas – Consejo de Defensa Croata torizado y apoyo logístico. De hecho, eran unidades VRS Serbias – Ejército de la República de Srpska mecanizadas utilizadas como puntas de lanza de 1.3.3 Unidades Extranjeras: éstas son Unidades ofensivas, y como bastiones defensivos. Estas unida- Extranjeras de países y regiones vecinas: Yugoslavia, des eran denominadas principalmente “Oklopne” y Croacia, Krajina y la Provincia Autónoma de Bosnia “Gardijske” (que significa brigadas Acorazadas y Occidental. Tienen permitido operar dentro de Es- Guardias), y están representadas como Unidades de pacios Extranjeros y espacios dentro de BiH, donde Élite en este juego. pueden realizar Operaciones y Recolocación Estraté- gica, pero no Reemplazos. Las Unidades Extranjeras Unidad a Unidad de son desplegadas vía Cartas de Estrategia, y su impli- Plena Potencia Élite Reducida cación reduce la Actitud Extranjera de un jugador. Ejército Estas unidades son: Factor de Factor de Combate Movimiento MUJ Bosnias – El Mujahid, voluntarios musul- (FC) (FM) manes Factor de Bajas (FB) Élite Reducida HV Croata – Ejército Croata SDG Serbio – Guardia de Voluntarios Serbios Unidades Estándar/Domésticas SVK Serbio – Ejército Serbio de Krajina Serbia Croata Bosnia NOZB Serbia – Defensa Popular de Bosnia Occi- dental. 1.3.4 Limitaciones de Unidad: algunas unidades tienen limitaciones en sus posibilidades de Combate o Movimiento. Están indicadas en la ficha de la uni- Unidades Extranjeras (se despliegan desde) dad con un número FC o FM a la inversa (EJEMPLO: Serbia (YUG) Serbia (KRA) las unidades NOZB serbias tienen un número blanco con un subrayado negro). HV Croatas – sólo pueden atacar y capturar uni- dades/espacios serbios. No pierde FA Cazinska Krajina solamente NOZB Serbios – sólo pueden mover, atacar y capturar espacios en Cazinska Krajina, el jugador Croata (CRO) Bosnia (CRO) pierde “0” FA cuando captura Espacios Claves. Sólo 1.3.5 Propiedades de Unidad: las Unidades Do- ataca a mésticas y Extranjeras pueden ejecutar las siguientes serbios Operaciones: Movimiento, Ataque y Atrincherar. Las unidades están definidas por las siguientes carac- terísticas: 1.4 Marcadores del Juego Factor de Combate (FC): la fuerza de combate de 1.4.1 Marcador de Actitud Extranjera “FA”: usa- una unidad.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina Joint Opinion on the Legal
    Strasbourg, Warsaw, 9 December 2019 CDL-AD(2019)026 Opinion No. 951/2019 Or. Engl. ODIHR Opinion Nr.:FoA-BiH/360/2019 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OSCE OFFICE FOR DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS (OSCE/ODIHR) BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA JOINT OPINION ON THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK GOVERNING THE FREEDOM OF PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, IN ITS TWO ENTITIES AND IN BRČKO DISTRICT Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 121st Plenary Session (Venice, 6-7 December 2019) On the basis of comments by Ms Claire BAZY-MALAURIE (Member, France) Mr Paolo CAROZZA (Member, United States of America) Mr Nicolae ESANU (Substitute member, Moldova) Mr Jean-Claude SCHOLSEM (substitute member, Belgium) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2019)026 - 2 - Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3 II. Background and Scope of the Opinion ...................................................................... 4 III. International Standards .............................................................................................. 5 IV. Legal context and legislative competence .................................................................. 6 V. Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 8 A. Definitions of public assembly ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from Bosnia and Herzegovina
    184 THE NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA VOL. 12, NO.4, 1999 Letter from Bosnia and Herzegovina HEALTH CARE AND THE WAR Before the war The war in Bosnia and Herzegovina started in November 1991 Until 1991, under the communist regime, the health care system with Serb attacks on the Croatian village of Ravno in south-east- of Bosnia and Herzegovina was centrally based, led and finan- ern Herzegovina and lasted until the Dayton Peace Agreement in ced, and was ineffective relative to comprehensive availability of 1 November 1995. The United Nations Security Council wrote 51 health personnel. 5,6 All resources (personnel, premises and tech- resolutions, one of which declared Serbia and Montenegro as nological equipment) were mainly in urban centres, with only a aggressors to the rest of the Yugoslavian Federation.' The country few situated in the remote rural areas, The health care system had suffered heavy damages, including that to the health care facilities three levels: primary, secondary, and tertiary care. 6 The total num- (hospitals, health centres, and pharmacies). 3 The damage to health ber of highly educated personnel-physicians and pharmacists care facilities is estimated to be US$ 13.85 million.' The Dayton with their associated specialties (1701 )-was high. In 1991, there Peace Agreement virtually preserved Bosnia and Herzegovina as were 23 medical personnel teams per 10000 inhabitants. 6 In 1991, an intact, internationally recognized state. However, it became there was recession with enormous inflation, which resulted in the divided into two entities-the Republic of Srpska, mainly popu- breakdown of the health care system and cessation of functioning lated by Serbs, and the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina of financial institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Consultative Visit in Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Strasbourg, 29 May 2012 EPAS (2012) 26 ENLARGED PARTIAL AGREEMENT ON SPORT (EPAS) Report of the Consultative visit in Bosnia and Herzegovina on the European Sports Charter, as well as the implementation of the Recommendation Rec(2001)6 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the prevention of racism, xenophobia and racial intolerance in sport EPAS (2012) 26 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Auto-evaluation reports by the authorities of Bosnia and Herzegovina Overview of the organisation and state structures Report on European Sport Charter Report on Rec (2001) 6 B. Report of the evaluation team C. Comments from Bosnia and Herzegovina Appendices: Final programme The Law on Sport in Bosnia and Herzegovina EPAS (2012) 26 A. Auto-evaluation reports by the authorities of Bosnia and Herzegovina BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA MINISTRY OF CIVIL AFFAIRS Summary Report Overview of sports organizations and state structures Sarajevo, October 2010 1. INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE 1.1. The Council of Ministers of Bosnia and Herzegovina – The Ministry of Civil Affairs of Bosnia and Herzegovina The BiH Sports Law regulates the sport in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the public interest and objectives of the competence of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Republic of Srpska and the Federation of BiH and the Brčko District of BiH and other levels of the administrative organization. The Sports Department operates within the Ministry and was established on 1 January 2009. The responsibilities of the Sports Department are defined by Article 60 of the BiH Sports Law ("Official Gazette of
    [Show full text]
  • THE POSAVINA BORDER REGION of CROATIA and BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA: DEVELOPMENT up to 1918 (With Special Reference to Changes in Ethnic Composition)
    THE POSAVINA BORDER REGION OF CROATIA AND BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA: DEVELOPMENT UP TO 1918 (with special reference to changes in ethnic composition) Ivan CRKVEN^I] Zagreb UDK: 94(497.5-3 Posavina)''15/19'':323.1 Izvorni znanstveni rad Primljeno: 9. 9. 2003. After dealing with the natural features and social importance of the Posavina region in the past, presented is the importance of this region as a unique Croatian ethnic territory during the Mid- dle Ages. With the appearance of the Ottomans and especially at the beginning of the 16th century, great ethnic changes oc- cured, primarily due to the expulsion of Croats and arrival of new ethnic groups, mostly Orthodox Vlachs and later Muslims and ethnic Serbs. With the withdrawal of the Ottomans from the Pannonian basin to the areas south of the Sava River and the Danube, the Sava becomes the dividing line creating in its border areas two socially and politically different environments: the Slavonian Military Frontier on the Slavonian side and the Otto- man military-frontier system of kapitanates on the Bosnian side. Both systems had a special influence on the change of ethnic composition in this region. With the withdrawal of the Ottomans further towards the southeast of Europe and the Austrian occu- pation of Bosnia and Herzegovina the Sava River remains the border along which, especially on the Bosnian side, further changes of ethnic structure occured. Ivan Crkven~i}, Ilo~ka 34, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia. E-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The research subject in this work is the border region Posavi- na between the Republic of Croatia and the Republic Bosnia- 293 -Herzegovina.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina: Attitudes on Violent Extremism and Foreign Influence
    Bosnia and Herzegovina: Attitudes on Violent Extremism and Foreign Influence January 4 - February 3, 2017 Detailed Methodology • The survey was conducted by Ipsos in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) on behalf of the International Republican Institute’s Center for Insights and Survey Research, and was funded by the National Endowment for Democracy. • Data was collected between January 4 and February 3, 2017 through face-to-face interviews at the respondents’ homes using the CAPI method (computer assisted personal interviewing). • A total of 1,537 interviews were completed, with an overall margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 percent at the midrange of the 95 percent confidence level. A nationally-representative sample was assembled based on a multistage stratification proportionate to population sample distribution, through the random selection of households and respondents. • The sample is composed of citizens of BiH, aged 18 and older and was based on the 2013 Census; Vital Statistics 2012 and Ipsos estimations derived from the Central Election Commission database; Agency for Identification Documents; and the Registers and Data Exchange of Bosnia and Herzegovina database. • The sampling frame consisted of polling station territories (approximate size of census units) within strata defined by municipalities and type of settlements (urban and rural). Polling station territories enable the most reliable sample selection, due to the fact that these units represent the most comprehensive and up-to-date data available. • Households were selected according to the random route technique. Starting from a given address, interviewers selected the third house down the same side of the street or the next available house for an interview from the starting point.
    [Show full text]
  • GENS VLACHORUM in HISTORIA SERBORUMQUE SLAVORUM (Vlachs in the History of the Serbs and Slavs)
    ПЕТАР Б. БОГУНОВИЋ УДК 94(497.11) Нови Сад Оригиналан научни рад Република Србија Примљен: 21.01.2018 Одобрен: 23.02.2018 Страна: 577-600 GENS VLACHORUM IN HISTORIA SERBORUMQUE SLAVORUM (Vlachs in the History of the Serbs and Slavs) Part 1 Summary: This article deals with the issue of the term Vlach, that is, its genesis, dis- persion through history and geographical distribution. Also, the article tries to throw a little more light on this notion, through a multidisciplinary view on the part of the population that has been named Vlachs in the past or present. The goal is to create an image of what they really are, and what they have never been, through a specific chronological historical overview of data related to the Vlachs. Thus, it allows the reader to understand, through the facts presented here, the misconceptions that are related to this term in the historiographic literature. Key words: Vlachs, Morlachs, Serbs, Slavs, Wallachia, Moldavia, Romanian Orthodox Church The terms »Vlach«1, or later, »Morlach«2, does not represent the nationality, that is, they have never represented it throughout the history, because both of this terms exclusively refer to the members of Serbian nation, in the Serbian ethnic area. –––––––––––– [email protected] 1 Serbian (Cyrillic script): влах. »Now in answer to all these frivolous assertions, it is sufficient to observe, that our Morlacchi are called Vlassi, that is, noble or potent, for the same reason that the body of the nation is called Slavi, which means glorious; that the word Vlah has nothing
    [Show full text]
  • Reunifying Mostar: Opportunities for Progress
    REUNIFYING MOSTAR: OPPORTUNITIES FOR PROGRESS 19 April 2000 ICG Balkans Report N° 90 Sarajevo/Washington/Brussels, 19 April 2000 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................i I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................1 A. HDZ Obstruction...................................................................................................2 B. International Community Disarray..........................................................................3 II. BROKEN PROMISES: 1994-1999 .........................................................................4 A. The 1994 Geneva MOU .........................................................................................4 B. Towards Ethnic Apartheid......................................................................................4 C. EU Aid Reinforces Ethnic Apartheid ........................................................................6 D. Madrid and Dayton: defining the local administration of Mostar ................................7 E. Koschnick’s Decree and the Rome Agreement: EU Caves in to the HDZ.....................9 F. Mostar’s First Elections and the Myth of the Interim Statute ...................................12 G. The Liska Street Incident and Unified Police..........................................................18 H. No Progress, New Elections .................................................................................24 I. No progress,
    [Show full text]
  • Aquaculture Development in Bosnia and Herzegovina
    27 Aquaculture development in Bosnia and Herzegovina Jasmin Omeragić Veterinary Faculty Veterinary Faculty of the University of Sarajevo Zmaja od Bosne 90, 71000 Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina [email protected] Omeragić, J. 2009. Aquaculture development in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In M.G. Bondad-Reantaso, J.R. Arthur and R.P. Subasinghe (eds). Strengthening aquaculture health management in Bosnia and Herzegovina. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. No. 524. Rome, FAO. pp 27–33. ABSTRACT Bosnia and Herzegovina has a very long and rich tradition in aquaculture. Important advantages that the country possesses for the development of aquaculture include abundant clean water, high-quality, educated and cheap labour, high capability of fish processing factories, and the high quality of its hatcheries. Thanks to these and other factors, Bosnia and Herzegovina has a great potential for increasing national aquaculture production. During the war period of 1991–1995, the majority of the fish farms were destroyed along with their entire infrastructure. After the war, the process of privatization started, leading to an increase in fish production. The privatization of the fish farms, which since 1995 were in the possession of the State, has broadened the possibilities for aquaculture development in the country, including the use of new technologies, the expansion of capacity and the production of high-quality feeds. The export of fish and fish products from Bosnia and Herzegovina to European Union markets as officially permitted by EU Decision 2008/156/EC is the most important success of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s agriculture sector in the post-war period. INTRODUCTION Bosnia and Herzegovina is located in the Western Balkans region and has a total surface area of 51 209.2 km2, of which land accounts for 51 197 km2 and sea accounts for 12.2 km2.
    [Show full text]
  • STREAMS of INCOME and JOBS: the Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins
    STREAMS OF INCOME AND JOBS: The Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Highlights – The Value of Water for Electricity 5 Highlights – The Value of Water for Agriculture 8 Highlights – The Value of Public Water Supplie 11 Highlights – The Value of Water for Tourism 12 Conclusion: 13 BACKGROUND OF THE BASINS 15 METHODOLOGY 19 LAND USE 21 GENERAL CONTEXT 23 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR ELECTRICITY 29 Background of the Trebišnjica and Neretva hydropower systems 30 Croatia 33 Republika Srpska 35 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 37 Montenegro 40 Case study – Calculating electricity or revenue sharing in the Trebišnjica basin 41 Gap Analysis – Water for Electricity 43 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR AGRICULTURE 45 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 46 Croatia 51 Case study – Water for Tangerines 55 Case study – Wine in Dubrovnik-Neretva County 56 Case study – Wine in Eastern Herzegovina 57 Republika Srpska 57 Gap Analysis – Water for Agriculture 59 Montenegro 59 THE VALUE OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES 63 Republika Srpska 64 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 66 Montenegro 68 Croatia 69 Gap Analysis – Public Water 70 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR TOURISM 71 Croatia 72 CONCLUSION 75 REFERENCES 77 1st edition Author/data analysis: Hilary Drew With contributions from: Zoran Mateljak Data collection, research, and/or translation support: Dr. Nusret Dresković, Nebojša Jerković, Zdravko Mrkonja, Dragutin Sekulović, Petra Remeta, Zoran Šeremet, and Veronika Vlasić Design: Ivan Cigić Published by WWF Adria Supported by the
    [Show full text]
  • The Croats Under the Rulers of the Croatian National Dynasty
    THE CROATS Fourteen Centuries of Perseverance Publisher Croatian World Congress (CWC) Editor: Šimun Šito Ćorić Text and Selection of Illustrations Anđelko Mijatović Ivan Bekavac Cover Illustration The History of the Croats, sculpture by Ivan Meštrović Copyright Croatian World Congress (CWC), 2018 Print ITG d.o.o. Zagreb Zagreb, 2018 This book has been published with the support of the Croatian Ministry of culture Cataloguing-in-Publication data available in the Online Catalogue of the National and University Library in Zagreb under CIP record 001012762 ISBN 978-953-48326-2-2 (print) 1 The Croats under the Rulers of the Croatian National Dynasty The Croats are one of the oldest European peoples. They arrived in an organized manner to the eastern Adriatic coast and the re- gion bordered by the Drina, Drava and Danube rivers in the first half of the seventh century, during the time of major Avar-Byzan- tine Wars and general upheavals in Europe. In the territory where they settled, they organized During the reign of Prince themselves into three political entities, based on the previ­ Branimir, Pope John VIII, ous Roman administrative organizations: White (western) the universal authority at Croatia, commonly referred to as Dalmatian Croatia, and Red the time, granted (southern) Croatia, both of which were under Byzantine su­ Croatia international premacy, and Pannonian Croatia, which was under Avar su­ recognition. premacy. The Croats in Pannonian Croatia became Frankish vassals at the end of the eighth century, while those in Dalmatia came under Frankish rule at the beginning of the ninth century, and those in Red Croatia remained under Byzantine supremacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB)
    E1468 Consulting Services for Environment Impact Assessment Public Disclosure Authorized in the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB) No. TF052845/GE-P084608 Public Disclosure Authorized F I N A L EIA R E P O R T Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Sarajevo/Banja Luka, August 2006 Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia Proposed Integrated Ecosystem Management of the Nerteva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB) Project Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms EXECUTIVE SUMMARY List of Tables List of Pictures List of Annexes References 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .....................................................................................14 1.1. Background .............................................................................................. 14 1.2. Project objectives..................................................................................... 15 1.3. Project components ................................................................................. 16 2. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ......................................21 2.1. Overall Project Implementation Arrangements....................................... 21 2.2. Requirements of the WB .......................................................................... 22 2.3. Bosnia and Herzegovina environmental policy ........................................ 23 2.4. Legislation of Republic of Croatia ............................................................ 26 2.5. Evaluation of project environmental aspects .................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • 2014Savremenapoljoprivreda45.Pdf
    ISSN: 0350-1205 UDC: 63(497.1)(051)-„540.2“ „CONTEMPORARY AGRICULTURE” The Serbian Journal of Agricultural Sciences „SAVREMENA POLJOPRIVREDA” Srpski časopis za poljoprivredne nauke Editor-in-Chief / Glavni i odgovorni urednik Prof. dr Milan Popović, dekan fakulteta. Editor / Urednik Prof. dr Blagoje Stančić Assistant Editors / Pomoćnici urednika: Prof. dr Vesna Rodić Prof. dr Đorđe Malenčić Prof. dr Niko Milošević Doc. dr Ivan Stančić Lectors for the English Language / Lektori za engleski jezik Bojana Šobot, dipl. filolog Aleksandar Jagrović, dipl. filolog Editorship / Uredništvo Prof. dr Petar Erić (Serbia), Prof. dr Branko Konstantinović (Serbia), Prof. dr Milenko Jovanović (Serbia), Prof. dr Zoran Keserović (Serbia), Prof. dr Milan Popović (Serbia), Prof. dr Stanimir Kovčin (Serbia), Prof. dr Jelena Ninić-Todorović (Serbia), Doc. dr Radovan Savić (Serbia), Prof. dr Paul Pirsan (Romania), Prof. dr Vera Stojšin (Serbia), Robin C. Anderson, PhD (USA), Prof. dr Karaoglanidis George (Greece), Prof. dr Norbert Lukač (Slovakia). Editorial council / Izdavački savet Prof. dr Radovan Pejanović (Serbia), Prof. dr Miroslav Malešević (Serbia), Dipl. ecc. Gordana Radović (Serbia), Prof. dr Vitomir Vidović (Serbia), Prof. dr Branka Gološin (Serbia), Prof. dr Saša Orlović (Serbia), Prof. dr Nedeljko Tica (Serbia), Prof. dr Nikola Đukić (Serbia), Prof. dr Dragan Glamočić (Serbia), Prof. dr Nada Korać (Serbia), Prof. dr Jovan Crnobarac (Serbia), Prof. dr Stanko Boboš (Serbia), Prof. dr Ljiljana Nešić (Serbia), Prof. dr Petar Sekulić (Novi Sad), Prof. dr Mirjana Milošević (Serbia), Prof. dr Cvijan Mekić (Serbia), Prof. MVD Juraj Pivko, DSc. (Slovakia), Prof. dr Šandor Šomođi (Hungary), Prof. dr Sava Bunčić (UK), Prof. dr Boris Stegny (Ukraina), Prof. dr Kole Popovski (Macedonia), Prof.
    [Show full text]