DOCSLIB.ORG

Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology-Okmulgee - OK - Assurance Argument - Exported on 2/17/2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology-Okmulgee - OK - Assurance Argument - Exported on 2/17/2020 Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology-Okmulgee - OK - Assurance Argument - Exported on 2/17/2020 Assurance Argument Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology-Okmulgee - OK Review date: 3/9/2020 Introduction 2 Criterion 1 - Mission: The institution’s mission is clear and articulated publicly; it guides the institution’s operations. 3 1.A - Core Component 1.A: The institution’s mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. 3 Argument 3 Sources 7 1.B - Core Component 1.B: The mission is articulated publicly. 9 Argument 9 Sources 11 1.C - Core Component 1.C: The institution understands the relationship between its mission and the diversity of society. 12 Argument 12 Sources 14 1.D - Core Component 1.D: The institution’s mission demonstrates commitment to the public good. 15 Argument 15 Sources 16 1.S - Criterion 1 - Summary: The institution’s mission is clear and articulated publicly; it guides the institution’s operations. 18 Summary 18 Criterion 2 - Integrity: Ethical and Responsible Conduct: The institution acts with integrity; its conduct is ethical and responsible. 19 2.A - Core Component 2.A: The institution operates with integrity in its financial, academic, personnel, and auxiliary functions; it establishes and follows policies and processes for fair and ethical behavior on the part of its governing board, administration, faculty, and staff. 19 Argument 19 Sources 22 2.B - Core Component 2.B: The institution presents itself clearly and completely to its students and to the public with regard to its programs, requirements, faculty and staff, costs to students, control, and accreditation relationships. 25 Argument 25 Sources 27 2.C - Core Component 2.C: The governing board of the institution is sufficiently autonomous to make decisions in the best interest of the institution and to assure its integrity. 29 Argument 29 Sources 31 2.D - Core Component 2.D: The institution is committed to freedom of expression and the pursuit of truth in teaching and learning. 33 Argument 33 Sources 34 2.E - Core Component 2.E: The institution’s policies and procedures call for responsible acquisition, discovery and application of knowledge by its faculty, students and staff. 35 Argument 35 Sources 36 2.S - Criterion 2 - Summary: The institution acts with integrity; its conduct is ethical and responsible. 37 Summary 37 Criterion 3 - Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support: The institution provides high quality education, wherever and however its offerings are delivered. 38 3.A - Core Component 3.A: The institution’s degree programs are appropriate to higher education. 38 Argument 38 Sources 44 3.B - Core Component 3.B: The institution demonstrates that the exercise of intellectual inquiry and the acquisition, application, and integration of broad learning and skills are integral to its educational programs. 48 Argument 48 Sources 52 3.C - Core Component 3.C: The institution has the faculty and staff needed for effective, high-quality programs and student services. 55 Argument 55 Sources 61 3.D - Core Component 3.D: The institution provides support for student learning and effective teaching. 64 Argument 64 Sources 70 3.E - Core Component 3.E: The institution fulfills the claims it makes for an enriched educational environment. 74 Argument 74 Sources 76 3.S - Criterion 3 - Summary: The institution provides high quality education, wherever and however its offerings are delivered. 78 Summary 78 Criterion 4 - Teaching and Learning: Evaluation and Improvement: The institution demonstrates responsibility for the quality of its educational programs, learning environments, and support services, and it evaluates their effectiveness for student learning through processes designed to promote continuous improvement. 79 4.A - Core Component 4.A: The institution demonstrates responsibility for the quality of its educational programs. 79 Argument 79 Sources 84 4.B - Core Component 4.B: The institution demonstrates a commitment to educational achievement and improvement through ongoing assessment of student learning. 88 Argument 88 Sources 93 4.C - Core Component 4.C: The institution demonstrates a commitment to educational improvement through ongoing attention to retention, persistence, and completion rates in its degree and certificate programs. 97 Argument 97 Sources 102 4.S - Criterion 4 - Summary: The institution demonstrates responsibility for the quality of its educational programs, learning environments, and support services, and it evaluates their effectiveness for student learning through processes designed to promote continuous improvement. 104 Summary 104 Criterion 5 - Resources, Planning, and Institutional Effectiveness: The institution’s resources, structures, and processes are sufficient to fulfill its mission, improve the quality of its educational offerings, and respond to future challenges and opportunities. The institution plans for the future. 105 5.A - Core Component 5.A: The institution’s resource base supports its current educational programs and its plans for maintaining and strengthening their quality in the future. 105 Argument 105 Sources 110 5.B - Core Component 5.B: The institution’s governance and administrative structures promote effective leadership and support collaborative processes that enable the institution to fulfill its mission. 113 Argument 113 Sources 115 5.C - Core Component 5.C: The institution engages in systematic and integrated planning. 117 Argument 117 Sources 120 5.D - Core Component 5.D: The institution works systematically to improve its performance. 122 Argument 122 Sources 124 5.S - Criterion 5 - Summary: The institution’s resources, structures, and processes are sufficient to fulfill its mission, improve the quality of its educational offerings, and respond to future challenges and opportunities. The institution plans for the future. 127 Summary 127 Introduction OSU Institute of Technology (OSUIT) was established as a technical branch campus by the Oklahoma State University (OSU) system in 1946. OSUIT is a public higher education institution located in Okmulgee, OK. The campus is in rural, eastern Oklahoma, located 40 miles south of Tulsa, OK, and 107 miles east of Oklahoma City, OK. The university is also an Oklahoma state agency. It is governed by the OSU/A&M Board of Regents with oversight from the Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education. The university is an associate and baccalaureate degree-granting institution that offers degrees in cybersecurity, engineering, nursing, and many other technology-related degrees. The stakeholders of OSUIT include students, parents, alumni, advisory committee members, faculty, sponsors, employees, community, business partners, grant-giving organizations, and the employers that hire its graduates. OSUIT provides a variety of services to the public. Most notably, OSUIT provides education to its students. It provides assurance to the students’ future employers that the students have met the requirements of graduation. OSUIT also offers custom employee training to industry as specialized continuing education for their employees. OSUIT is a full-service institution supporting students through the complete educational lifecycle with effective enrollment management, academic advisement, financial aid counseling, bookstore services, dining services, payment planning, technical support, learning management support, and housing. Coursework can be completed using multiple modalities including face-to- face, blended, and fully-online. This allows our students the flexibility they need to work and still earn a degree, from virtually anywhere in the world. Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology-Okmulgee - OK - Assurance Argument - Exported on 2/17/2020 1 - Mission The institution’s mission is clear and articulated publicly; it guides the institution’s operations. 1.A - Core Component 1.A The institution’s mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. 1. The mission statement is developed through a process suited to the nature and culture of the institution and is adopted by the governing board. 2. The institution’s academic programs, student support services, and enrollment profile are consistent with its stated mission. 3. The institution’s planning and budgeting priorities align with and support the mission. (This sub-component may be addressed by reference to the response to Criterion 5.C.1.) Argument Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology (OSUIT) was established in 1946 to uniquely focus on the vocational and technical education needs of post-WWII Oklahoma. Since then, the institution’s purpose has evolved just as industry and technology have continued to advance. Our current mission reflects a determined focus on student outcomes, response to the state’s economic development, and the demand for a technologically-sophisticated workforce. The mission statement, articulated and reiterated in various official documents and publications, is the foundation for the campus’s vision, curricular development, services provided, outreach efforts, and budgeting priorities. The Mission OSU Institute of Technology’s mission is to serve as the lead institution of higher education in Oklahoma and the region providing comprehensive, high-quality, advancing technology programs and services to prepare and sustain a diverse student body as competitive members of a world-class workforce and contributing members of society. 1.A.1 The OSUIT mission statement is developed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Integrating Technology with Student-Centered Learning
    integrating technology with student-centered learning A REPORT TO THE NELLIE MAE EDUCATION FOUNDATION Prepared by Babette Moeller & Tim Reitzes | July 2011 www.nmefdn.org 1 acknowledgements We thank the Nellie Mae Education Foundation (NMEF) for the grant that supported the preparation of this report. Special thanks to Eve Goldberg for her guidance and support, and to Beth Miller for comments on an earlier draft of this report. We thank Ilene Kantrov for her contributions to shaping and editing this report, and Loulou Bangura for her help with building and managing a wiki site, which contains many of the papers and other resources that we reviewed (the site can be accessed at: http://nmef.wikispaces.com). We are very grateful for the comments and suggestions from Daniel Light, Shelley Pasnik, and Bill Tally on earlier drafts of this report. And we thank our colleagues from EDC’s Learning and Teaching Division who shared their work, experiences, and insights at a meeting on technology and student-centered learning: Harouna Ba, Carissa Baquarian, Kristen Bjork, Amy Brodesky, June Foster, Vivian Gilfroy, Ilene Kantrov, Daniel Light, Brian Lord, Joyce Malyn-Smith, Sarita Pillai, Suzanne Reynolds-Alpert, Deirdra Searcy, Bob Spielvogel, Tony Streit, Bill Tally, and Barbara Treacy. Babette Moeller & Tim Reitzes (2011) Education Development Center, Inc. (EDC). Integrating Technology with Student-Centered Learning. Quincy, MA: Nellie Mae Education Foundation. ©2011 by The Nellie Mae Education Foundation. All rights reserved. The Nellie Mae Education Foundation 1250 Hancock Street, Suite 205N, Quincy, MA 02169 www.nmefdn.org 3 Not surprising, 43 percent of students feel unprepared to use technology as they look ahead to higher education or their work life.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 12-682 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- BILL SCHUETTE, MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL, Petitioner, v. COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, INTEGRATION AND IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND FIGHT FOR EQUALITY BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY (BAMN), ET AL., Respondents. --------------------------------- --------------------------------- On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Sixth Circuit --------------------------------- --------------------------------- BRIEF FOR RESPONDENTS THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY, MARY SUE COLEMAN, AND LOU ANNA K. SIMON --------------------------------- --------------------------------- LEONARD M. NIEHOFF HONIGMAN MILLER SCHWARTZ AND COHN, LLP 130 S. First Street 4th Floor Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 [email protected] (734) 418-4246 Attorney for University Respondents ================================================================ COCKLE LEGAL BRIEFS (800) 225-6964 WWW.COCKLELEGALBRIEFS.COM i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ................................................ 1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE .............................. 4 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .............................. 8 ARGUMENT ........................................................ 11 I. Petitioning the elected public officials who constitute the governing boards of the University Respondents is a political process ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Tax-Exempt) Commercial Paper General Revenue Pledge Notes, Series B
    Amended Commercial Paper Memorandum Ratings Moody's: P-1 S&P: A-1+ Fitch: F1+ $300,000,000 The Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia Commercial Paper General Revenue Pledge Notes consisting of: Commercial Paper General Revenue Pledge Notes, Series A (Tax-Exempt) Commercial Paper General Revenue Pledge Notes, Series B (Taxable) Offering This Amended Commercial Paper Memorandum provides information concerning two series of commercial paper notes (collectively, the "Notes") issued by The Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia (the "University"). The Notes consist of (i) a tax-exempt series (the "Series A Notes") and (ii) a taxable series (the "Series B Notes"). The first Notes were issued in 2003 and are issued from time to time to finance and refinance certain capital projects and cash requirements of the University. Currently, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Goldman, Sachs & Co. are serving as dealers for the Notes (the "Dealers") and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company is serving as Issuing and Paying Agent for the Notes. Liquidity support for the Notes is provided solely by the University. See "APPENDIX A — THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA" and the audited financial statements of the University in APPENDIX B. The Notes The Notes are issued in denominations of $100,000 and integral multiples of $1,000 in excess of $100,000. The Notes are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to Section 3(a)(2) in the case of the Series A Notes and Section 3(a)(4) in the case of the Series B Notes.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020/21 Forsyth Facts Brochure
    2020/21 FORSYTH FACTS AGE 2–GRADE 6 Welcome Home! WE PROVIDE CHILDREN WITH A SUPPORTIVE ATMOSPHERE AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR SUCCESS IN ORDER THAT THEY MAY DEVELOP SELF-CONFIDENCE AND A LOVE OF LEARNING 2020 WE EMPOWER STUDENTS TO EMBRACE CHALLENGE AS THEY FIND JOY IN LEARNING 2016 2019 ABOUT US Forsyth School is a leading independent, co-educational elementary school for children age 2 through Grade 6. Located across the street from Washington University and Forest Park in the Wydown-Forsyth Historic District, Forsyth provides an unforgettable experience on a one-of-a-kind campus with classrooms in six repurposed, historic homes. The challenging and engaging curriculum fosters independence and prepares students to thrive in secondary school and beyond. An Unforgettable Experience With neighbors including Washington University and Forest Park, many of the city’s best cultural institutions are walkable resources for Forsyth students. Science classes track biodiversity and study birds in Forest Park. Art classes visit the Mildred Lane Kemper Art Museum and the Saint Louis Art Museum. Physical Education holds the annual all-school mile run at Francis Field at Washington University, and sports teams run in Forest Park. Classes often walk to the Missouri History Museum and the Saint Louis Zoo. The core of Forsyth’s unique campus consists of six historic homes, acquired one by one over five decades since 1965. All six houses were built in the 40+ 1920s and are listed on the National Register of Historic Places; each has HOUSEHOLD ZIP CODES been repurposed and renovated to provide spacious classrooms, a library, and FROM MISSOURI lunchroom spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy and Procedure No: HCIT-CS-SS-2.0 Topic: Student Services Category: Client Services Issue Date: February 2017 Version: 2.0
    HEART College of Innovation & Technology (Formerly Caribbean Institute of Technology) Policy and Procedure No: HCIT-CS-SS-2.0 Topic: Student Services Category: Client Services Issue Date: February 2017 Version: 2.0 This policy replaces all versions of the HCIT/CIT Student Welfare Policy. Purpose To clearly identify and communicate the services that caters to the personal development and wellbeing of students by the HEART College of Innovation & Technology (HCIT) while they pursue their studies in a selected vocation towards certification. Policy The organization provides student welfare services to assist clients/ students transition from orientation through to graduation by coordinating their College experience an impacting the students socially, mentally, physically and financially while completing their training. Scope To acquaint all new clients/students with the policies, rules, regulations and opportunities at the College that will enhance the possibility of them entering and functioning successfully within the workforce (technical & employability skills). Responsibilities Registrar: Has overarching responsibility for Student Welfare/ Affairs Registrar/ Guidance Counsellor/ Student Affairs Officer: Collaboratively plans orientation for new students/ clients. Student Affairs Officer: Has oversight for the Student Union Guidance Counsellor: Provides counselling services HEART College of Innovation & Technology Policy HCIT-CS- SS-2.0: Student Services Version 2.0 – February 2017 Policy Guidelines HCIT Recruitment Process Interview Process At HCIT, prospective students who meet the programmes requirements are selected and contacted via telephone using a formulated schedule to which they are given the option of choosing an interview time and date that is convenient to them. An HCIT interview instrument is administered which allows the interviewer to analyse and evaluate the interviewees thought processes and his/her suitability for the programme applied for.
    [Show full text]
  • Technology in Early Childhood Programs 1
    Draft Technology in Early Childhood Programs 1 Technology in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through Age 8 A joint position statement of the National Association for the Education of Young Children and the Fred Rogers Center for Early Learning and Children’s Media at Saint Vincent College Proposed 2011 It is the position of NAEYC and the Fred Rogers Center that technology and interactive media are learning tools that, when used in intentional and developmentally appropriate ways and in conjunction with other traditional tools and materials, can support the development and learning of young children. In this position statement, the word “technology” is used broadly, referring to interactive digital and electronic devices, software, multi-touch tablets, technology-based toys, apps, video games and interactive (nonlinear) screen- based media. Technology is continuously evolving. As a result, this statement focuses on the principles and practices that address the technologies of today, while acknowledging that in the future new and emerging technologies will require continual revisions and adaptation. The most effective use of technology in an early childhood setting involves the application of tools and materials to enhance children’s learning and development, interactions, communication, and collaboration. As technology increasingly finds its way into mainstream culture, the types and uses of technology in early childhood programs have also expanded dramatically to include computers, tablets, e-books, mobile devices, handheld gaming devices, digital cameras and video camcorders, electronic toys, multimedia players for music and videos, digital audio recorders, interactive whiteboards, software applications, the Internet, streaming media, and more. These technologies are increasingly expanding the tools and materials to which young children have access both in their homes and in their classrooms, affecting the ways in which young children interact with the world and with others.
    [Show full text]
  • The Robotic Preschool of the Future: New Technologies for Learning and Play
    The Robotic Preschool of the Future: New Technologies for Learning and Play Walter Dan Stiehl, Angela Chang, Ryan Wistort, and Cynthia Breazeal MIT Media Lab 20 Ames St, E15-468 Cambridge, MA 02139 USA +1 617 452 5605 [email protected], ABSTRACT enhance the magic of play. Technology can add elements of magic to play and learning BACKGROUND and improve communication between students in and out of Unfortunately, in many of today’s educational reading toys the classroom. Robots, as a powerful, multi-modal, the child is simply a passive listener and not an active embodied technology pose a unique benefit to enhancing participant. Such systems lack the ability to sense if the collaborative play and storytelling. In this paper we child does not pay attention and there is no feedback to the present three technologies currently in development in the device to encourage the child’s active participation. Personal Robots Group at the MIT Media Lab and describe scenarios in which these systems can be combined to Recently, robotic devices, such as Lego Mindstorms, have enhance the preschool experience. been created based upon Papert’s Constructionism idea. While these systems have been shown to be beneficial to Keywords young children [3], the form factor of blocks lends itself Robotic companion, pre-school, education more to vehicles than soft characters. Additionally, the INTRODUCTION focus of the interaction is more to teach the foundations of Fantasy play and storytelling have been shown to be vitally programming to accomplish a task as opposed to free form important to learning, especially in young children [1].
    [Show full text]
  • A Top-Notch, Cost-Free Education for Children Pre-K Through Grade 12 Expert Teaching
    A top-notch, cost-free education for children Pre-K through Grade 12 Expert teaching. Technology- enabled learning. World-class facilities. A Milton Hershey School education is one of the nation’s finest. MHS students are well prepared for college and careers. They pursue life- changing opportunities in this safe and supportive community of mentors and friends. MHS is cost-free — from food and housing to sports equipment, healthcare, and more. Students even have the opportunity to accrue up to $95,000 in scholarship support. classEs Teaching, resources wHat we offer and results • Technology-enhanced classrooms and instruction in a one-to-one environment • Small classes that foster personalized learning How it works • Hands-on Learning, from STEAM ElEmEntary Pre-K – Grade 4 (science, technology, engineering, arts, middlE Grades 5 – 8 and math) and problem-based learning sEnior Grades 9 – 12 to field trips to co-op and internship opportunities • Career Training, beginning in middle school and resulting in two or more students make life-cHanging industry-recognized certifications by progress at mHs – Achievement graduation consistently outperforms PA state averages; academic growth consistently • College Preparatory Education, exceeds PA growth average. including honors and AP courses, the Our programming is top-notch, opportunity to earn college credits, and our students are the proof.* dual-enrollment and partnerships with higher education * Measured by Pennsylvania standardized assessments • Skills for Life, from social and emotional learning to character and leadership development to health and wellness homE lifE Safe and wHat we offer supportive • Guidance and structure from attentive and caring adults • Character development and a focus on respect, integrity and accountability How it works • Everything students need, from games Students live in safe and supportive and computers to sports equipment and homes with 8 to 12 other students quiet places to study of the same gender and similar age.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HUMBER COLLEGE INSTITUTE of TECHNOLOGY and ADVANCED LEARNING 205 Humber College Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M9W 5L7
    AGREEMENT FOR OUTBOUND ARTICULATION B E T W E E N: THE HUMBER COLLEGE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND ADVANCED LEARNING 205 Humber College Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M9W 5L7 hereinafter referred to as "Humber" of the first part. -and- FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY 1201 S. State Street, Big Rapids, Michigan, USA 49307 hereinafter referred to as "Ferris", of the second part; THIS AGREEMENT made this June 1, 2019 THIS AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) dated June 1, 2019 (the “Effective Date”) B E T W E E N: THE HUMBER COLLEGE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND ADVANCED LEARNING (hereinafter referred to as the “Humber”) -and- FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY (hereinafter referred to as the “Ferris”) RECITALS: A. The Humber College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning (“Humber”) is a Post- Secondary Institution as governed by the Ontario Colleges of Applied Arts and Technology Act, 2002 (Ontario). B. Ferris State University (“Ferris”), a constitutional body corporate of the State of Michigan, located at 1201 S. State, CSS-310, Big Rapids, Michigan, United States. C. Humber and Ferris desire to collaborate on the development of an Outbound Articulation agreement to facilitate educational opportunities in applied higher education. D. Humber and Ferris (together, the “Parties” and each a “Party”) wish to enter into Agreement to meet growing demands for student mobility and shall be arranged from time to time in accordance with this Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual promises hereinafter contained, it is agreed by and between the Parties: 1.0 Intent of the Agreement a) To facilitate the transfer of students from Humber with appropriate prerequisite qualifications and grades for advanced standing into the HVACR Engineering Technology and Energy Management Bachelor of Science Program at Ferris (the “Program”).
    [Show full text]
  • Educators' Insights on Utilizing Ipads to Meet Kindergarten Goals
    Educators’ insights on utilizing iPads to meet kindergarten goals by Lisa Tsumura A Master’s research project submitted in conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Master of Education Graduate Department of Education in the University of Ontario Institute of Technology © Copyright by Lisa Tsumura, 2017 i Abstract This study investigates how educators plan and review the integration of iPads to meet Early Learning Kindergarten curriculum goals across the four newly-established domains of the Ontario Kindergarten Curriculum. The literature reviewed for this study indicates that earlier studies on iPads have primarily focused on measuring literacy and mathematics learning outcomes and little research has been done on how technology can be used in a play-based learning environment. This study explores other domains of Kindergarten iPad use which are less documented in the literature. The study captures teacher planning for iPad integration to help students meet outcomes in other domains (such as Problem-Solving and Innovating; and Self-Regulation and Well- being). This study follows an action research model and captures the conversations of two educators implementing iPads who set goals (plan) and document their reflective practice through recorded conversations at regular intervals. Results of this study suggest that iPads can be used to develop skills in all four domains of the curriculum and that iPads can be used as a tool by teachers to document learning in a play-based environment. Our findings indicate that when teachers engage in action research, they are able to reflect and improve upon their own practices. As teachers develop new pedagogical understandings about the relationship between iPads and play, they are then able to support students’ digital play.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019 of Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
    THE RESEARCH UNIVERSITY IN THE HELMHOLTZ ASSOCIATION Annual Report 2019 of Karlsruhe Institute of Technology KIT – The Research University in the Helmholtz Association www.kit.edu AT A GLANCE KIT – The Research University in the Helmholtz Association Mission We create and impart knowledge for the society and the environment. From fundamental research to applications, we excel in a broad range of disciplines, i.e. in natural sciences, engineering sciences, economics, and the humanities and social sciences. We make significant contributions to the global challenges of humankind in the fields of energy, mobility, and information. Being a big science institution, we take part in international competition and hold a leading position in Europe. We offer research-based study programs to prepare our students for responsible positions in society, industry, and science. Our innovation efforts build a bridge between important scientific findings and their application for the benefit of society, economic prosperity, and the preservation of our natural basis of life. Our working together and our management culture are characterized by respect, cooperation, confidence, and subsidiarity. An inspiring work environment as well as cultural diversity characterize and enrich the life and work at KIT. Employees 2019 Total: 9,398 Teaching and research: 5,183 Professors: 368 Foreign scientists and researchers: 1,178 Infrastructure and services: 4,215 Trainees: 371 Students Winter semester 2019/2020: 24,381 Budget 2019 in Million Euros Total: 951.3 Federal funds: 310.2 State funds: 271.4 Third-party funds: 369.7 EDITORIAL 3 Karlsruhe Institute of Technology – The Research University in the Helmholtz Association – stands for excellent research and outstanding academic ed- ucation.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Oregon Community College to Oregon Institute of Technology Bachelor of Applied Science in Technology and Management
    Central Oregon Community College to Oregon Institute of Technology Bachelor of Applied Science in Technology and Management Articulation Agreement 2020 - 2021 Catalog It is agreed that students transferring with an Associate of Applied Science (AAS) or Associate of Science (AS) from Central Oregon Community College (COCC) to Oregon Institute of Technology’s (Oregon Tech) Bachelor of Applied Science in Technology and Management (BTM) will be given full credit for up to 60 credits of Career Technical Electives and additional listed courses as completed. This agreement is based on the evaluation of the rigor and content of the general education and technical courses at both COCC and Oregon Tech, and is subject to a reevaluation every year by both schools for continuance. This agreement is dated August 25, 2020. Baccalaureate students must complete a minimum of 60 credits of upper-division work before a degree will be awarded. Upper-division is defined as 300-and 400-level classes at a bachelor’s degree granting institution. Baccalaureate students at Oregon Tech must complete 45 credits from Oregon Tech before a degree will be awarded. Admission to Oregon Tech is not guaranteed. Students must apply for admission to Oregon Tech in accordance with the then-existing rules, policies and procedures of Oregon Tech. Students are responsible for notifying the Oregon Tech Admissions and Registrar’s Office when operating under an articulation agreement to ensure their credits transfer as outlined in this agreement. In order to utilize this agreement students must be attending COCC during the above catalog year. Students must enroll at Oregon Tech within three years of this approval.
    [Show full text]