DOCSLIB.ORG

Pacific Southwest Region Ecology Program Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PACIFIC SOUTHWEST REGION ECOLOGY PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT FY 2012 http://fsweb.r5.fs.fed.us/pr ogram/ecology/ 2 CONTENTS Photos: R5 Ecology Program in action ………………….. 3 Program overview …………………………………............ 6 Program staff ………………………………………………. 9 Program publications and reports, fy 2012……………… 12 Program major accomplishments and links to USDA and USFS Strategic Goals, and R5 Strategic Priorities, fy 2012…………………………………………… 15 Current external partners …………………………………. 48 Dedicated to the memory of Howard Kuljian 3 3-yr resample of tree regeneration plots, Fire management field trip, Long Fire, Showers Fire, LTBMU Eldorado NF UC -Davis Ecology Graduate Group field Fen monitoring, Lassen NF course, Inyo NF Postfire tree regeneration inventory, 2012 Ecology Program field crew “boot Zaca Fire, Los Padres NF camp” 4 Postfire vegetation inventory, Rich Fire, Ecology Program statistics training, Davis Plumas NF Forest management field trip to Sagehen Dinkey Project CFLRP field day, Sierra NF Field Station, Tahoe NF Monitoring of fire effects on Shasta Interagency old -growth forest snowwreath, Shasta-Trinity NFs management discussion, Emerald Bay State Park, Lake Tahoe Basin 5 Giant sequoia seedling survi val Fuel treatment effectiveness moni - study, Sequoia NF toring, Cougar Fire, Modoc NF International Work Climate change monitoring, Serra dos Reviewin g fuel treatment network in the Órgãos National Park, Brazil Jerusalem Hills, Israel 3rd International Climate Change and Mediterranean shrubland restoration field Natural Resource Management Seminar, visit, Valencia, Spain participants from 25 countries 6 R-5 Regional Ecology Program Ecology Program Mission Statement assist in development of Regional ecological priorities as they pertain to the “To provide leadership and program direction that USDA and USFS Strategic Plan goals and R5 Strategic Priorities incorporates ecological science in the Agency's act as the principal ecological liaison multiple-scale approach to managing natural between USFS Region 5 and other federal resources for sustainability and diverse human and state agencies, research institutions, needs. NGOs, the public and media provide assistance to the Province To facilitate understanding, development and Ecologists in the form of funding, technical appropriate use of ecological principles for Agency expertise, and logistical support activities such as landscape analysis and provide assistance and ecological input to bioregional and forest assessments for assessment, land management planning, inventory Forest Plan processes and monitoring, and project implementation.” develop and steward applicable Regional and National standards R5 Program Overview review Ecology Program work plans and The Region 5 Ecology Program provides products aid in the recruitment of qualified products and expertise fundamental to candidates for ecology positions sustainable, science-based, multiple-use land Regionwide management in the Pacific Southwest. The represent Region 5 and the Regional Program’s principal purpose is to ensure and Ecology Program at local, Regional, and enable the application of current ecological National functions and events science to land and resource management on support Region 5 Forests in their the National Forests in California. The Regional interpretation and implementation of the Regional Ecological Restoration initiative Program is headed by a GS-13 Ecologist in the support Region 5 efforts to manage for Regional Office, a GS-11/12 Assistant Regional climate change mitigation and adaptation Ecologist is also stationed in the Regional to coordinate Fire Return Interval office, a GS-12 Province Ecologist is stationed Departure mapping in Region 5 on each of five Provinces (zones of three to serve on the executive committee for the four National Forests), and a cost-share California Fire Science Consortium manage the Research Natural Area (RNA) ecological analyst at the Regional level is co- Program managed with the University of California- manage the Regional Aspen Delineation Davis. Project serve as a technical advisor to bodies such Primary functions at the Regional level as the Regional Forest Planning core include: team, Regional Climate Change Integration Team, and the Sierra Nevada provide expert ecological input and advice Forest Carnivore Conservation Assessment to the Regional Forester, Regional Office staff, and Region 5 Forests and Districts 7 Primary functions at the Province-and Program had fallen continuously since the early Forest-level include: 1990’s, when funding reached or exceeded $1,000,000 per year in 2011 dollars (Fig. 1). provision of expert vegetation & fire Staffing has also dropped significantly, from a ecology input to ecosystem management high of 16 in the mid 1990’s, to six in late and planning (e.g. pre-NEPA consultation, monitoring, ID-Teams) 2011, and 7½ (due to partial funding of Forest training and technology transfer employees) in late 2012. By contrast, the ecological support to restoration planning National Park Service in California increased and implementation the size of its ecology workforce from six in climate change interpretation 1994 to over 35 in 2009 (Fig. 1). The Regional support to fuels treatment planning Ecology Program is a national leader in monitoring design, implementation and analysis attracting funding from external sources (Fig. fire and fire regime modeling and mapping 2). Between 2006 and 2012, the REP more determination of site potentials and than doubled its effective budget by way of ecosystem suitability partner funding, project funding, and grants. development of desired future conditions vegetation classification and mapping The Regional Ecology Program staff (and development of management affiliated Forest and District staff) meet at least interpretations once annually to discuss programs of work, development of state & transition and funding, standards and guidelines, future other stand-dynamics models planning, and topics of current interest. habitat modeling, mapping, and prediction involvement with the California Fire Trainings are held periodically. Annual program Science Consortium at the subregional reviews and annual program of work meetings scale are also held on each Province. Province interaction and collaboration with Forest Ecologists operate under a shared services and District resource staff agreement between the Region and the RNA program coordination for the host Province Forests. Province Ecologists prepare, Forest with assistance of the Regional Ecologist and The Regional Ecology Program (REP) is forest Resource staff, an annual Program of partially supported by a Regional earmark. In Work describing objectives, activities, and fy 2012 total earmark funding came to assistance needed to complete the planned $700,000. Regional funds came from the work; the annual POW is tied to National, following sources: NFIM (33%), WFHF (30%), Regional, and Forest goals and priorities. An NFVW (26%), and NFWF (11%). Province annual meeting (1) to review the previous Ecologists supplement their Regional allocation fiscal year’s accomplishments, and (2) to with Forest-level funding and funding derived negotiate the upcoming fiscal year’s POW, is elsewhere (examples include the California held with the attendance of the Province Energy Commission, USFS State and Private Ecologist, the Regional Ecologist, Resource Forestry, the Tahoe Science Program, Staff officers, and any other interested parties. California Dept. of Fish and Game, the National The final program of work is agreed to by the Fire Plan, and the Joint Fire Sciences Program). Forest Supervisors and RO Director of Until 2010, Regional funding for the Ecology Ecosystem Management. 8 Region 5 Ecology Program Budget and Staffing, 1984-2012 1200 40 35 1000 30 800 25 Budget (2011 $s) 600 20 Ecol Prog Staff Staff NPS ecol staff 15 400 10 200 Thousands of $ (2011 dollars) $ (2011 of Thousands 5 0 0 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 Fiscal year Figure 1. Ecology Program (REP) earmark funding, and number of REP staff, 1984-2012. Number of National Park Service ecologists in California provided for comparison. Ecology Program budget and funding support from external sources, 2006-2012 $4,500,000 Ecol. Prog. earmark $4,000,000 External funds $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total Figure 2. REP earmark funding and funding secured from external sources by the REP, 2006-2012. The REP has more than doubled its effective budget over the last 7 fiscal years through external funding. 9 R5 Regional Ecology Program Staff REGIONAL OFFICE Hugh Safford, Ph.D. Regional Ecologist Pacific Southwest Region 1323 Club Drive Vallejo, CA 94592 Phone: 707-562-8934 Fax: 707-562-9050 Email: [email protected] Department of Environmental Science and Policy University of California Davis, CA 95616 Phone: 530-219-0898 Fax: 530-752-3350 Email: [email protected] Sarah Sawyer, Ph.D. Assistant Regional Ecologist Pacific Southwest Region 1323 Club Drive Vallejo, CA 94592 Phone: 707-562-8924 Fax: 707-562-9050 Email: [email protected] NORTHERN PROVINCE Serving Klamath, Shasta-Trinity, Mendocino and Six Rivers National Forests Ramona Butz, Ph.D. Province Ecologist Six Rivers National Forest 1330 Bayshore Avenue Eureka, CA 95501 Phone: 707-441-3584 Email: [email protected] 10 SIERRA-CASCADE PROVINCE Serving Lassen, Modoc and Plumas National Forests Kyle Merriam Province Ecologist Plumas National Forest P.O.
Recommended publications
  • Appendix C - Response to Science

    Appendix C - Response to Science

    Ringo EIS Appendix C - Response to Science Appendix C – RESPONSE TO SCIENCE The following table summarizes the Forest Service consideration of publications that were provided during the comment period and which were directly referenced in the comments, or determined to either have some relevance to the analysis or indicate there is a difference of opinion within the body of the science. NEPA states that comments on the EIS shall be as specific as possible (40 CFR 1503.3 Specificity of Comments). Some of the following documents are considered non-substantive comments that do not warrant further response. In either case, the following table explains the consideration given by the Forest Service. Referenced Document Forest Service Consideration/Response Cited Science by Dick Artley Mr. Artleys Attachment #1- Scientists Reveal the Natural Resources in the Forest are Harmed (and some destroyed) by Timber Harvest Activities Al-jabber, Jabber M. “Habitat Fragmentation:: Effects and The picture in the Cascadia Wildlands Project publication shows clearcuts and talks Implications” about fragmentation and edge effects which results in crowding of the ark (Meffe et Clearcuts and forest fragmentation, Willamette NF, Oregon. al. 1997) where after logging, species all try to exist in the remaining patches of From: Cascadia Wildland Project, Spring 2003 unlogged forest. Clear cuts are not proposed for the Ringo project. There are http://faculty.ksu.edu.sa/a/Documents/Habitat%20Fragmentation%20Eff openings that will be created that are consistent with gaps and openings of at least 0.5 ects%20and%20Implication.pdf acres described in the Old Growth Definitions (USDA FS 1993, Region 6 interim Old Growth Definitions).
  • Original Draft CWPP

    Original Draft CWPP

    DRAFT CITY OF SANTA BARBARA May 2020 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Table of Contents SECTIONS Acronyms and Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................................................v Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................................... vii 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Development Team ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Community Involvement ................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.3.1 Stakeholders ................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3.2 Public Outreach and Engagement Plan ........................................................................................................ 4 1.3.3 Public Outreach Meetings .............................................................................................................................
  • The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity

    The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity

    fire The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity s is evidenced year after year, the na- ture of the “fire problem” in south- Jon E. Keeley, Hugh Safford, C.J. Fotheringham, A ern California differs from most of Janet Franklin, and Max Moritz the rest of the United States, both by nature and degree. Nationally, the highest losses in ϳ The 2007 wildfire season in southern California burned over 1,000,000 ac ( 400,000 ha) and property and life caused by wildfire occur in included several megafires. We use the 2007 fires as a case study to draw three major lessons about southern California, but, at the same time, wildfires and wildfire complexity in southern California. First, the great majority of large fires in expansion of housing into these fire-prone southern California occur in the autumn under the influence of Santa Ana windstorms. These fires also wildlands continues at an enormous pace cost the most to contain and cause the most damage to life and property, and the October 2007 fires (Safford 2007). Although modest areas of were no exception because thousands of homes were lost and seven people were killed. Being pushed conifer forest in the southern California by wind gusts over 100 kph, young fuels presented little barrier to their spread as the 2007 fires mountains experience the same negative ef- reburned considerable portions of the area burned in the historic 2003 fire season. Adding to the size fects of long-term fire suppression that are of these fires was the historic 2006–2007 drought that contributed to high dead fuel loads and long evident in other western forests (e.g., high distance spotting.
  • BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT and BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION Lassen

    BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT and BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION Lassen

    BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT and BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION FOR THE Lassen 15 Restoration Project Modoc National Forest Prepared by: Mary Flores /s/ Mary Flores 28 October 2017 John Clark /s/ John Clark 28 October 2017 I. INTRODUCTION This Biological Assessment/Evaluation (BA/BE) documents the potential effects to terrestrial USDA Forest Service Region 5 wildlife species by the implementation of activities considered in the Lassen 15 Restoration Project (Lassen 15 Project) Environmental Analysis. The Lassen 15 project area is located on the Warner Mountain Ranger District roughly five air miles northeast of Davis Creek, California. The proposed project area is 25,276 acres, although only 8,004 acres are targeted for treatment. Biological Assessments and Evaluations document the analysis necessary to ensure proposed management actions would not jeopardize the continued existence of, or cause adverse modification of habitat for federally listed or Forest Service sensitive species as described in the Forest Service Manual (FSM section 2672.43) (USFS 2005). This BA/BE was prepared in accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, and follows standards established in Forest Service Manual direction (FSM 2671.2 and 2672.42) for threatened, endangered and sensitive (TES) wildlife species. The determination of whether to include wildlife species in this analysis was based on review of (1) the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service IPAC data (website accessed on 22 October 2015) and (2) Forest Service Region 5 sensitive species list (October 2013). Table 1 displays whether the project is within the range of the species, whether suitable habitat is contained within or adjacent to the project, and whether the species has been previously detected within the area.
  • Where to Walk in Klamath County

    Where to Walk in Klamath County

    Where to Walk in City Parks City parks are open dawn to dusk but use is limited. •CLOSED: Picnic tables, playground equipment and Klamath County restrooms. County Parks •Limited Use: Lawns and fields are open to groups of 10 All county parks* are open for day use only provided social distancing people or less. Games can be played provided there is regulations are adhered to. However, all campsites, restrooms and the appropriate 6 feet of social distancing. other hard equipment are closed. *Except Hagelstein Park National Parks Oregon Department of The National Park Service is modifying its operations on a park-by- park basis in accordance with the latest guidance from the Centers for Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and state and local public health ODFW lands are open for hiking. authorities. While most facilities and events are closed or canceled, many There are no public restrooms available. of the outdoor spaces remain accessible to the public. Before visiting, The closest hiking area to Oregon Tech is the Miller Island road please check with individual parks regarding changes to park operations. access. www.nps.gov/coronavirus The dog training area is open year round and is the only place that you can legally walk your dog off leash in Klamath County. Lava Beds National Monument (40 miles from K- Falls) Permits are required to park in ODFW lots - Costs: $10/day pass The Lava Beds Visitor Center, campground, Cave Loop Road, and all park and $30/annual pass. restrooms are closed. Trails and most park roads will remain open.
  • Full Agenda Packet

    Full Agenda Packet

    NOTICE AND AGENDA FOR REGULAR MEETING DATE/TIME: Wednesday, February 13, 2019, 1:30 PM PLACE: Board of Supervisors Chambers 651 Pine Street, Martinez, CA 94553 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Commission will hear and consider oral or written testimony presented by any affected agency or any interested person who wishes to appear. Proponents and opponents, or their representatives, are expected to attend the hearings. From time to time, the Chair may announce time limits and direct the focus of public comment for any given proposal. Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by LAFCO to a majority of the members of the Commission less than 72 hours prior to that meeting will be available for public inspection in the office at 651 Pine Street, Six Floor, Martinez, CA, during normal business hours as well as at the LAFCO meeting. All matters listed under CONSENT ITEMS are considered by the Commission to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless requested by a member of the Commission or a member of the public prior to the time the Commission votes on the motion to adopt. For agenda items not requiring a formal public hearing, the Chair will ask for public comments. For formal public hearings the Chair will announce the opening and closing of the public hearing. If you wish to speak, please complete a speaker’s card and approach the podium; speak clearly into the microphone, start by stating your name and address for the record.
  • Water Supply Management Report 2018-2019 Water Year

    Water Supply Management Report 2018-2019 Water Year

    FINAL January 28, 2020 City of Santa Barbara Water Supply Management Report 2018-2019 Water Year Prepared by Water Resources Division, Public Works Department City of Santa Barbara Water Supply Management Report 2019 Water Year (October 1, 2018 – September 30, 2019) Water Resources Division, Public Works Department January 28, 2020 INTRODUCTION The City of Santa Barbara operates the water utility to provide water for its citizens, certain out-of-City areas, and visitors. Santa Barbara is an arid area, so providing an adequate water supply requires careful management of water resources. The City has a diverse water supply including local reservoirs (Lake Cachuma and Gibraltar Reservoir), groundwater, State Water, desalination, and recycled water. The City also considers water conservation an important tool for balancing water supply and demand. The City's current Long-Term Water Supply Plan (LTWSP) was adopted by City Council on June 14, 2011. This annual report summarizes the following information: The status of water supplies at the end of the water year (September 30, 2019) Drought outlook Water conservation and demand Major capital projects that affect the City’s ability to provide safe clean water Significant issues that affect the security and reliability of the City’s water supplies Appendix A provides supplemental detail. Additional information about the City's water supply can be found on-line at: www.SantaBarbaraCA.gov/Water. WATER SUPPLIES The City has developed five different water supplies: local surface water; local groundwater (which includes water that seeps into Mission Tunnel); State Water; desalinated seawater; and recycled water. Typically, most of the City’s demand is met by local surface water reservoirs and recycled water and augmented as necessary by local groundwater, State Water, and desalination.
  • DIXIE FIRE INCIDENT UPDATE Date: 08/30/2021 Time: 7:00 A.M

    DIXIE FIRE INCIDENT UPDATE Date: 08/30/2021 Time: 7:00 A.M

    DIXIE FIRE INCIDENT UPDATE Date: 08/30/2021 Time: 7:00 a.m. @USFSPlumas @USFSPlumas West Zone Information Line: (530) 592-0838 @LassenNF @LassenNF East Zone Information Line: (530) 289-6735 @LassenNPS @LassenNPS Media Line: (530) 588-0845 ddd @BLMNational @BLMNational Incident Website: www.fire.ca.gov @cal_fire @calfire Email Sign-Up: tinyurl.com/dbdhsfd3 INCIDENT FACTS Incident Start Date: 7/13/2021 Incident Start Time: 5:15 p.m. Incident Type: Vegetation Cause: Under Investigation Incident Location: Feather River Canyon near Cresta Powerhouse CAL FIRE Unit: Butte, Lassen-Modoc, Tehama Unified Command Agencies: CAL FIRE, United States Forest Service, National Park Service Size: 771,183 acres Containment: 48% Expected Full Containment: TBD First Responder Fatalities: 0 First Responder Injuries: 3 Civilian Fatalities: 0 Civilian Injuries: 0 Structures Single Residences Destroyed: 685 Single Residences Damaged: 52 Threatened: 11,489 Multiple Residences Destroyed: 8 Multiple Residences Damaged: 4 Non-residential Commercial Non-residential Commercial Total Destroyed: 139 Damaged: 10 Destroyed: 1,277 Other Minor Structures Other Minor Structures Destroyed: 437 Damaged: 26 Total Mixed Commercial/Residential Mixed Commercial/Residential Damaged: 92 Destroyed: 8 Damaged: 0 CURRENT SITUATION Current Situation Dixie Fire West Zone: Firefighters continue to aggressively fight active fire, as winds increase into the beginning of the week, bringing red flag conditions in some areas, and extreme fire behavior is expected. Firefighters continue to patrol fire lines, reinforce primary control lines, and establish secondary and contingency lines. Fire continues to burn in steep and rugged terrain. Cooperating agencies continue to work for the safety of crews, including scouting for roadway repairs, infrastructure needs and removal of dangerous trees and vegetation.
  • Selected Wildflowers of the Modoc National Forest Selected Wildflowers of the Modoc National Forest

    Selected Wildflowers of the Modoc National Forest Selected Wildflowers of the Modoc National Forest

    United States Department of Agriculture Selected Wildflowers Forest Service of the Modoc National Forest An introduction to the flora of the Modoc Plateau U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region i Cover image: Spotted Mission-Bells (Fritillaria atropurpurea) ii Selected Wildflowers of the Modoc National Forest Selected Wildflowers of the Modoc National Forest Modoc National Forest, Pacific Southwest Region U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region iii Introduction Dear Visitor, e in the Modoc National Forest Botany program thank you for your interest in Wour local flora. This booklet was prepared with funds from the Forest Service Celebrating Wildflowers program, whose goals are to serve our nation by introducing the American public to the aesthetic, recreational, biological, ecological, medicinal, and economic values of our native botanical resources. By becoming more thoroughly acquainted with local plants and their multiple values, we hope to consequently in- crease awareness and understanding of the Forest Service’s management undertakings regarding plants, including our rare plant conservation programs, invasive plant man- agement programs, native plant materials programs, and botanical research initiatives. This booklet is a trial booklet whose purpose, as part of the Celebrating Wildflowers program (as above explained), is to increase awareness of local plants. The Modoc NF Botany program earnestly welcomes your feedback; whether you found the book help- ful or not, if there were too many plants represented or too few, if the information was useful to you or if there is more useful information that could be added, or any other comments or concerns. Thank you. Forest J. R. Gauna Asst.
  • Copyrighted Material

    Copyrighted Material

    INDEX See also Accommodations and Restaurant indexes, below. GENERAL INDEX American Express emergency Battery Chamberlain (San number, 246 Francisco), 36 America the Beautiful- Bayleaf Trail, 142 AA (American Automobile A National Parks and Federal Bayporter Express (San Fran- Association), 13, 14, 243 Recreational Lands Pass, 19 cisco Bay area), 34 Abalone Point, 115, 117 Amtrak, 14, 15 Beaches. See also specific Abbotts Lagoon, 255 to San Francisco, 34 beaches Access America, 246 Andrew Molera State Park, Lake Tahoe, 212 Accommodations. See also 6, 92–95 north of San Francisco, Accommodations Index Angel Island, 3 102–104, 107, 109, 111, best, 8 Angel Island State Park, 117, 118, 120–122, 126 the coast north of San 46–49 Redwood National and Francisco, 128–129 Ano Nuevo Island, 85 State Parks, 256–257 the coast south of San Ano Nuevo Point, 84, 87 San Francisco Bay area, Francisco, 97–98 Ano Nuevo Point Trail, 85 36, 56, 59, 74, 77 Death Valley National Park, Ano Nuevo State Reserve, south of San Francisco, 240–241 3, 84–87 87, 93 green-friendly, 18 Arch Rock, 68, 70 Bear Valley, 2–3, 68–70 Lake Tahoe, 221–222 Area codes, 243 Bear Valley Trail, 68, 70, 72 San Francisco Bay area, Ash Mountain Entrance Bear Valley Visitor Center, 78–79 (Sequoia National 35, 68 Sequoia & Kings Canyon Park), 186 Beaver Creek, 145 National Parks, 203–204 The Association of British Belgum Trail, 49 tipping, 248–249 Insurers, 245 Ben Johnson Trail, 59–60 toll-free numbers & web- Atwell Mill Campground, 204 Bennett Peak, 240 sites for, 253–254 Australia Berry
  • RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile

    RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile

    RV sites in the United States This GPS POI file is available here: https://poidirectory.com/poifiles/united_states/accommodation/RV_MH-US.html Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile Camp Map 370 Lakeside Park Map 5 Star RV Map 566 Piney Creek Horse Camp Map 7 Oaks RV Park Map 8th and Bridge RV Map A AAA RV Map A and A Mesa Verde RV Map A H Hogue Map A H Stephens Historic Park Map A J Jolly County Park Map A Mountain Top RV Map A-Bar-A RV/CG Map A. W. Jack Morgan County Par Map A.W. Marion State Park Map Abbeville RV Park Map Abbott Map Abbott Creek (Abbott Butte) Map Abilene State Park Map Abita Springs RV Resort (Oce Map Abram Rutt City Park Map Acadia National Parks Map Acadiana Park Map Ace RV Park Map Ackerman Map Ackley Creek Co Park Map Ackley Lake State Park Map Acorn East Map Acorn Valley Map Acorn West Map Ada Lake Map Adam County Fairgrounds Map Adams City CG Map Adams County Regional Park Map Adams Fork Map Page 1 Location Map Adams Grove Map Adelaide Map Adirondack Gateway Campgroun Map Admiralty RV and Resort Map Adolph Thomae Jr. County Par Map Adrian City CG Map Aerie Crag Map Aeroplane Mesa Map Afton Canyon Map Afton Landing Map Agate Beach Map Agnew Meadows Map Agricenter RV Park Map Agua Caliente County Park Map Agua Piedra Map Aguirre Spring Map Ahart Map Ahtanum State Forest Map Aiken State Park Map Aikens Creek West Map Ainsworth State Park Map Airplane Flat Map Airport Flat Map Airport Lake Park Map Airport Park Map Aitkin Co Campground Map Ajax Country Livin' I-49 RV Map Ajo Arena Map Ajo Community Golf Course Map
  • Fabuleux Parcs De La Californie: Déserts, Montagnes Et

    Fabuleux Parcs De La Californie: Déserts, Montagnes Et

    Index Les numéros en bleu renvoient aux cartes. Le texte en vert renvoie aux parcs et réserves. A D Abbots Lagoon Trail 40 Dante’s View 17 Ahwahnee, The 28 Dead Giant 30 Alcatraz, île d’ 37 Death Valley National Park 14, 15 Arbres de Josué 13 Death Valley Scotty 14 Artist’s Palette 18 Del Norte Coast Redwoods Auto Log 24 State Park 41 Avenue of the Giants 41 Devastated Area 43 Drake Beach 39 B Badwater Basin 17 E Balconies Cave 35 Earthquake Trail 39 Barker Dam 8 El Capitan 30 Bear Gulch Cave 35 Elephant Seal Overlook 40 Big Tree Wayside Walk 42 Emerald Bay State Park 43 Borax Museum 16 Enderts Beach Road 42 Bridalveil Fall 30 F C Faille de San Andreas 39 California Tunnel Tree 32 Five Brooks Ranch 40 Californie 4, 5 Furnace Creek 16 Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary 33 G Channel Islands National Park 33 Channel Islands National Park Visitor General Grant Tree 26 Center 35 General Sherman Tree 24 Chimney Rock 39 Geology Tour Road 7 Cholla Cactus Garden 7 Giant Forest 24 Cima Dome 13 Giant Forest Museum 24 Cinder Cones 10 Glacier Point 30 Coast Trail 40 Golden Gate National Cottonwood Spring 7 Recreation Area 37 Crystal Cave 24 Grizzly Giant 32 http://www.guidesulysse.com/catalogue/FicheProduit.aspx?isbn=9782765875406 H Lower Yosemite Fall Trail 28 Half Dome 30 Happy Isles 31 M Happy Isles Nature Center 31 Marin Headlands 37 Hetch Hetchy Valley 32 Mariposa Grove 32 Hidden Valley 8 Mesquite Flat Sand Dunes 18 High Peaks 35 Miner’s Ridge Trail 42 Historic Stovepipe Well 18 Mist Trail 31 Hole-in-the-Wall 11 Mitchell Caverns 13 Hospital Rock 24 Mojave National Preserve 8, 9 Humboldt Redwoods State Park 40 Moro Rock 24 Moro Rock/Crescent Meadow Road 24 I Mosaic Canyon 18 Mount Tamalpais State Park 38 Indian Beach Loop 40 Mount Vision Road 40 Inn at Death Valley 16 Muir Beach 38 Muir Beach Overlook 38 J Muir, John 32 Jedediah Smith Redwoods Muir Woods National Monument 38 State Park 41 John Muir 32 N Joshua Tree National Park 6 Nation’s Christmas Tree Ceremony 26 Jumbo Rocks 7 Newton B.