DOCSLIB.ORG

Modoc National Wildlife Refuge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modoc National Wildlife Refuge U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Modoc National Wildlife Refuge Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment December 2009 Vision Statement “Located near the confluence of the north and south forks of the Pit River, Modoc National Wildlife Refuge will conserve, restore, protect, and manage a mosaic of seasonal wetlands, semi- permanent wetlands, wet meadows, riparian, and sagebrush-steppe habitats. These habitats will provide important resting, feeding, and nesting areas for ducks, geese, and other migratory birds. Modoc Refuge’s high- quality habitat will play a key role in the long-term recovery of Central Valley greater sandhill cranes. As an integral part of the surrounding community, Modoc Refuge will provide high quality wildlife-dependent recreation including hunting, fishing, wildlife observation, photography, and interpretation. The Refuge will continue to be known for its high-quality environmental education program offered to generations of students. Visitors will develop a greater understanding and appreciation for the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System and refuge management programs and for the importance of protecting lands for wildlife conservation.” Disclaimer CCPs provide long term guidance for management decisions and set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes and identify the Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute a commitment for staffing increases, operational and maintenance increases, or funding for future land acquisition. Modoc National Wildlife Refuge Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan Prepared by: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 8 2800 Cottage Way, W-1832 Sacramento, CA 95825 Modoc National Wildlife Refuge PO Box 1610 Alturas, CA 96101 December 2009 -- Date: J ~ -/ S--o ? egional Director, Pacific Southwest Region Implementation of this Comprehensive Conservation Plan and alternative management actions/programs have been assessed consistent with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 USC 4321 et seq.) Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction and Background ............................................................................. 1 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 2. Purpose of and Need for Plan .................................................................................... 3 3. Legal and Policy Guidance ......................................................................................... 3 3.1 National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act ..................................... 3 3.2 Appropriate Use Policy ..................................................................................... 4 3.3 Compatibility Policy ........................................................................................... 5 3.4 Biological Integrity, Diversity, and Environmental Health Policy .............. 6 4. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ........................................................................... 6 5. The National Wildlife Refuge System ...................................................................... 7 6. Modoc Refuge .............................................................................................................. 9 6.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 9 6.2 Refuge History ................................................................................................... 9 7. Refuge Purposes........................................................................................................ 10 8. The Refuge Vision ..................................................................................................... 11 9. Existing and New Partnerships .............................................................................. 11 10. Wilderness Review .................................................................................................... 12 Chapter 2. The Planning Process .......................................................................................... 13 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 13 2. The Planning Process ............................................................................................... 13 3. Planning Hierarchy ................................................................................................... 14 4. The Planning Team ................................................................................................... 15 5. Pre-Planning .............................................................................................................. 16 6. Public Involvement in Planning ............................................................................... 17 7. Public Outreach ......................................................................................................... 18 8. Issues, Concerns, and Opportunities ...................................................................... 18 9. Development of the Refuge Vision .......................................................................... 19 10. Determining the Refuge Goals, Objectives, and Strategies ................................. 19 10.1 Goals .................................................................................................................. 19 10.2 Refuge Management Goals ............................................................................. 19 10.3 Objectives, Rationale, and Strategies ............................................................ 20 - i - 11. Development of the Refuge Management Alternatives ........................................ 20 11.1 Alternative A: No Action ................................................................................. 21 11.2 Alternative B: Habitat Emphasis ................................................................... 21 11.3 Alternative C: Proposed Action ...................................................................... 21 11.4 Alternative D: Visitor Services Emphasis ..................................................... 22 12. Selection of the Refuge Proposed Action ............................................................... 22 13. Plan Implementation................................................................................................. 22 Chapter 3. The Refuge Environment ..................................................................................... 23 1. Refuge Description ................................................................................................... 23 2. Geographic/Ecosystem Setting ............................................................................... 23 3. Physical Environment............................................................................................... 28 3.1 Climate and Air Quality ................................................................................... 28 3.2 Water Supply and Water Quality ................................................................... 30 3.3 Geology and Soils ............................................................................................. 33 4. Habitat ........................................................................................................................ 33 4.1 Wetlands ............................................................................................................ 36 4.1.1 Seasonal wetlands ................................................................................. 37 4.1.2 Semi-permanent wetlands .................................................................... 37 4.1.3 Wet meadows ......................................................................................... 37 4.2 Riverine ............................................................................................................. 38 4.3 Reservoir ........................................................................................................... 38 4.4 Riparian ............................................................................................................. 39 4.5 Sagebrush-steppe ............................................................................................. 40 4.6 Croplands .......................................................................................................... 40 5. Habitat Management ................................................................................................ 41 5.1 Water Management ......................................................................................... 41 5.1.1 Seasonal wetlands ................................................................................. 41 5.1.2 Semi-permanent wetlands .................................................................... 41 5.1.3 Wet Meadows ........................................................................................ 41 5.2 Vegetation Management ................................................................................. 42 5.2.1 Sagebrush-steppe .................................................................................. 42 5.2.2 Croplands ..............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT and BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION Lassen
    BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT and BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION FOR THE Lassen 15 Restoration Project Modoc National Forest Prepared by: Mary Flores /s/ Mary Flores 28 October 2017 John Clark /s/ John Clark 28 October 2017 I. INTRODUCTION This Biological Assessment/Evaluation (BA/BE) documents the potential effects to terrestrial USDA Forest Service Region 5 wildlife species by the implementation of activities considered in the Lassen 15 Restoration Project (Lassen 15 Project) Environmental Analysis. The Lassen 15 project area is located on the Warner Mountain Ranger District roughly five air miles northeast of Davis Creek, California. The proposed project area is 25,276 acres, although only 8,004 acres are targeted for treatment. Biological Assessments and Evaluations document the analysis necessary to ensure proposed management actions would not jeopardize the continued existence of, or cause adverse modification of habitat for federally listed or Forest Service sensitive species as described in the Forest Service Manual (FSM section 2672.43) (USFS 2005). This BA/BE was prepared in accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, and follows standards established in Forest Service Manual direction (FSM 2671.2 and 2672.42) for threatened, endangered and sensitive (TES) wildlife species. The determination of whether to include wildlife species in this analysis was based on review of (1) the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service IPAC data (website accessed on 22 October 2015) and (2) Forest Service Region 5 sensitive species list (October 2013). Table 1 displays whether the project is within the range of the species, whether suitable habitat is contained within or adjacent to the project, and whether the species has been previously detected within the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Where to Walk in Klamath County
    Where to Walk in City Parks City parks are open dawn to dusk but use is limited. •CLOSED: Picnic tables, playground equipment and Klamath County restrooms. County Parks •Limited Use: Lawns and fields are open to groups of 10 All county parks* are open for day use only provided social distancing people or less. Games can be played provided there is regulations are adhered to. However, all campsites, restrooms and the appropriate 6 feet of social distancing. other hard equipment are closed. *Except Hagelstein Park National Parks Oregon Department of The National Park Service is modifying its operations on a park-by- park basis in accordance with the latest guidance from the Centers for Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and state and local public health ODFW lands are open for hiking. authorities. While most facilities and events are closed or canceled, many There are no public restrooms available. of the outdoor spaces remain accessible to the public. Before visiting, The closest hiking area to Oregon Tech is the Miller Island road please check with individual parks regarding changes to park operations. access. www.nps.gov/coronavirus The dog training area is open year round and is the only place that you can legally walk your dog off leash in Klamath County. Lava Beds National Monument (40 miles from K- Falls) Permits are required to park in ODFW lots - Costs: $10/day pass The Lava Beds Visitor Center, campground, Cave Loop Road, and all park and $30/annual pass. restrooms are closed. Trails and most park roads will remain open.
    [Show full text]
  • 68. Raider Basin (Raider Creek) (Jensen and Schierenbeck 1989) Location This Recommended RNA (Rrna) Is Located About 1.6 Miles (2.5 Km) NW
    68. Raider Basin (Raider Creek) (Jensen and Schierenbeck 1989) Location This recommended RNA (rRNA) is located about 1.6 miles (2.5 km) NW. of Eagleville. It is in the South Warner Wilderness within the Modoc National Forest, Modoc County. Its boundaries include section 33 of T41N, R16E and sections 3, 4, 7-10, and 15-22 of T40N, R16E HBM (41°20'N., 120°09'W.), USGS Eagle Peak quad (fig. 137). Ecological subsection – Warner Mountains (M261Gf) and Surprise Valley (342Ba). Target Element White Fir Forest (Abies concolor) Distinctive Features Two major varieties of white fir have been recognized within its distribution range: Abies concolor var. lowiana (in the Sierra Nevada and NE. California) and A. concolor var. concolor (in the Rocky Mountain region). The rRNA contains large populations of relatively undisturbed examples of old-growth Abies concolor var. lowiana at the NE. extreme of its range. Figure 137—Raider Rare Fauna: Following the recommendation of an environmental assessment Basin rRNA (Camilleri 1979), six rams and eight ewes of California bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis californiana) were reintroduced into the Raider Creek Basin in 1980. However, due to an outbreak of bacterial pneumonia (Pasteurella sp.), transmitted from domestic livestock in 1987, all individuals are thought to have died. There have been no sightings of bighorn sheep since early 1988. The Modoc/Washoe Experiment Stewardship Committee is currently addressing another plan to reintroduce the bighorn sheep into the area. Rare birds known to frequent the area include golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos, State-listed species of special concern), bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus, Federally- and Stated-listed endangered species), prairie falcon (Falco mexicanus, Stated-listed species of special concern), and northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis, Stated-listed species of special concern).
    [Show full text]
  • DIXIE FIRE INCIDENT UPDATE Date: 08/30/2021 Time: 7:00 A.M
    DIXIE FIRE INCIDENT UPDATE Date: 08/30/2021 Time: 7:00 a.m. @USFSPlumas @USFSPlumas West Zone Information Line: (530) 592-0838 @LassenNF @LassenNF East Zone Information Line: (530) 289-6735 @LassenNPS @LassenNPS Media Line: (530) 588-0845 ddd @BLMNational @BLMNational Incident Website: www.fire.ca.gov @cal_fire @calfire Email Sign-Up: tinyurl.com/dbdhsfd3 INCIDENT FACTS Incident Start Date: 7/13/2021 Incident Start Time: 5:15 p.m. Incident Type: Vegetation Cause: Under Investigation Incident Location: Feather River Canyon near Cresta Powerhouse CAL FIRE Unit: Butte, Lassen-Modoc, Tehama Unified Command Agencies: CAL FIRE, United States Forest Service, National Park Service Size: 771,183 acres Containment: 48% Expected Full Containment: TBD First Responder Fatalities: 0 First Responder Injuries: 3 Civilian Fatalities: 0 Civilian Injuries: 0 Structures Single Residences Destroyed: 685 Single Residences Damaged: 52 Threatened: 11,489 Multiple Residences Destroyed: 8 Multiple Residences Damaged: 4 Non-residential Commercial Non-residential Commercial Total Destroyed: 139 Damaged: 10 Destroyed: 1,277 Other Minor Structures Other Minor Structures Destroyed: 437 Damaged: 26 Total Mixed Commercial/Residential Mixed Commercial/Residential Damaged: 92 Destroyed: 8 Damaged: 0 CURRENT SITUATION Current Situation Dixie Fire West Zone: Firefighters continue to aggressively fight active fire, as winds increase into the beginning of the week, bringing red flag conditions in some areas, and extreme fire behavior is expected. Firefighters continue to patrol fire lines, reinforce primary control lines, and establish secondary and contingency lines. Fire continues to burn in steep and rugged terrain. Cooperating agencies continue to work for the safety of crews, including scouting for roadway repairs, infrastructure needs and removal of dangerous trees and vegetation.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Wildflowers of the Modoc National Forest Selected Wildflowers of the Modoc National Forest
    United States Department of Agriculture Selected Wildflowers Forest Service of the Modoc National Forest An introduction to the flora of the Modoc Plateau U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region i Cover image: Spotted Mission-Bells (Fritillaria atropurpurea) ii Selected Wildflowers of the Modoc National Forest Selected Wildflowers of the Modoc National Forest Modoc National Forest, Pacific Southwest Region U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region iii Introduction Dear Visitor, e in the Modoc National Forest Botany program thank you for your interest in Wour local flora. This booklet was prepared with funds from the Forest Service Celebrating Wildflowers program, whose goals are to serve our nation by introducing the American public to the aesthetic, recreational, biological, ecological, medicinal, and economic values of our native botanical resources. By becoming more thoroughly acquainted with local plants and their multiple values, we hope to consequently in- crease awareness and understanding of the Forest Service’s management undertakings regarding plants, including our rare plant conservation programs, invasive plant man- agement programs, native plant materials programs, and botanical research initiatives. This booklet is a trial booklet whose purpose, as part of the Celebrating Wildflowers program (as above explained), is to increase awareness of local plants. The Modoc NF Botany program earnestly welcomes your feedback; whether you found the book help- ful or not, if there were too many plants represented or too few, if the information was useful to you or if there is more useful information that could be added, or any other comments or concerns. Thank you. Forest J. R. Gauna Asst.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Description--White Fir (WFR)
    California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Game California Interagency Wildlife Task Group White Fir Karen Shimamoto Vegetation Structure-- The White Fir (WFR) habitat is characterized by nearly monotypic even- aged overstory (Cheatham and Haller 1975, Paysen et al, 1980, Riegel 1982, Rundel et al. 1977). Overlapping crowns that cast deep shade are characteristic, although open stands are common (Cheatham and Haller 1975, Eyre 1980, Riegel 1982). Northern California specimens grow to about 70 m (230 ft) in height. Southern California specimens grow to about 30 m (100 ft) (Cheatham and Haller 1975). The understory may consist of sparsely scattered grasses, forbs, and shrubs, or white fir seedlings and saplings (Cheatham and Haller 1975, Eyre 1980, Paysen et al. 1980). However, on moist swales or drainage bottoms, herbaceous cover may approach 100 percent (Rundel et al. 1977). Downed material usually consists of logs, branches and needle litter (Cheatham and Haller 1975). Fire influences the white fir habitat by causing a mosaic of even-aged stands in different successional stages. Composition-- Mature white fir stands, normally monotypic, with more than 80 percent occurring as white fir, are found throughout California; from the Klamath Mountains along the north coast to the south coast mountain ranges, and in interior ranges from the Warner Mountains in the Great Basin to the Clark, Kingston, and New York mountain ranges in interior southern California (Rundel et al. 1977, Parker and Matyas 1981). Shade and downed woody material tend to inhibit understory species (Parker and Matyas 1981). In the Klamath Mountains, for example, canyon live oak and chinquapin are the predominant understory species and open stands usually include squawcarpet and barberry.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Emerency Operations Directory Chapter 50 Table of Contents NATIONAL ................................................................................................................................48 US Forest Service ............................................................................................................................................. 48 National Interagency Coordination Center (NICC) ..................................................................................... 49 Aviation Management Directorate ................................................................................................................. 50 FOREST SERVICE ...................................................................................................................51 Pacific Southwest Regional Office (FS5) ....................................................................................................... 51 Regional Office - McClellan............................................................................................................................ 52 Regional Office - Law Enforcement ............................................................................................................... 53 Regional Aviation Group - McClellan ........................................................................................................... 54 Regional Aviation Group - Fox Field ............................................................................................................. 55 Regional Aviation Group - Redding
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Order No. 21-07 Emergency Forest Closures
    Regional Order No. 21-07 USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region Emergency Forest Closure Pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 551 and 36 C.F.R. § 261.50(a) and (b), and to provide for public safety and protect natural resources, the following acts are prohibited on National Forest System lands within the Pacific Southwest Region. This Order supersedes Regional Order No. 21-04 and is effective from August 31, 2021, at 11:59 p.m. through September 17, 2021, at 11:59 p.m. 1. Going into or being upon National Forest System lands within the National Forests listed below. a. Tahoe National Forest b. Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit c. Plumas National Forest d. Lassen National Forest e. Mendocino National Forest f. Klamath National Forest g. Six Rivers National Forest h. Shasta-Trinity National Forest i. Modoc National Forest j. Cleveland National Forest k. San Bernardino National Forest l. Angeles National Forest m. Los Padres National Forest n. Sequoia National Forest o. Sierra National Forest p. Stanislaus National Forest q. Inyo National Forest 36 C.F.R. § 261.52(e). 2. Being on a National Forest System road within the National Forests listed below. a. Tahoe National Forest b. Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit c. Plumas National Forest d. Lassen National Forest e. Mendocino National Forest f. Klamath National Forest g. Six Rivers National Forest h. Shasta-Trinity National Forest i. Modoc National Forest j. Cleveland National Forest k. San Bernardino National Forest l. Angeles National Forest m. Los Padres National Forest n. Sequoia National Forest o. Sierra National Forest p.
    [Show full text]
  • Barrel Springs Backcountry Byway
    U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management Surprise Valley Barrel Springs Back Country Byway A Self-Guided Tour Welcome to the road less traveled! Few people get to experience the beautiful mountains and valley you see on the front cover. This brochure and map will tell you how to find and explore Surprise Valley- how it got its name, the history of the emigrants who ventured west in 1849, and the geological wonders that have shaped this landscape. A map showing the location of Cedarville and major highways in the area Getting There: From U.S. Hwy. 395 in California, five miles north of Alturas, Modoc County, take California Hwy. 299 east to Cedarville, California. From Interstate 80 at Wadsworth in Nevada, 30 miles east of Reno, take Nevada Hwy. 447 north through Gerlach, 141 miles to Cedarville, California. 2 SURPRISE VALLEY-BARREL SPRINGS BACK COUNTRY BYWAY A SELF-GUIDED TOUR Pronghorn antelope with Mount Bidwell in the background 3 CONTENTS 1. THE SECRET VALLEY…...……..1 2. BYWAY LOOP MAP……………..10 3. BYWAY DRIVING TOUR……....12 4. VISITOR TIPS……………………....28 5. WILDFLOWER GUIDE…….......30 Lake City Flouring Mill circa 1900 4 THE SECRET VALLEY The Warner Mountains soar up from the valley floor like a scene from an Ansel Adams photograph. In the valley, coveys of quail trickle across the quiet streets in little towns. At twilight, herds of mule deer join cattle and sheep in the green fields. There are no stoplights, no traffic, and no sirens. This is where the paved road ends. This place, Surprise Valley, is so removed, so distinct from the rest of California, that you, like others, may come to find that it is the Golden State’s best kept secret.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 98-425 An
    PUBLIC LAW 98-425-SEPT. 28, 1984 98 STAT. 1619 Public Law 98-425 98th Congress An Act Sept. 28, 1984 Entitled the "California Wilderness Act of 1984". [H.R. 1437] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That this title may California Wilderness Act be cited as the "California Wilderness Act of 1984". of 1984. National TITLE I Wilderness Preservation System. DESIGNATION OF WILDERNESS National Forest System. SEC. 101. (a) In furtherance of the purposes of the Wilderness Act, National parks, the following lands, as generally depicted on maps, appropriately monuments, etc. referenced, dated July 1980 (except as otherwise dated) are hereby 16 USC 1131 designated as wilderness, and therefore, as components of the Na­ note. tional Wilderness Preservation System- (1)scertain lands in the Lassen National Forest, California,s which comprise approximately one thousand eight hundred acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled "Caribou Wilder­ ness Additions-Proposed", and which are hereby incorporated in, and which shall be deemed to be a part of the Caribou Wilderness as designated by Public Law 88-577; 16 USC 1131 (2)s certain lands in the Stanislaus and Toiyabe Nationals note. 16 USC 1132 Forests, California, which comprise approximately one hundred note. sixty thousand acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled "Carson-Iceberg Wilderness-Proposed", dated July 1984, and which shall be known as the Carson-Iceberg Wilderness: Pro­ vided, however, That the designation of the Carson-Iceberg Wil­ derness shall not preclude continued motorized access to those previously existing facilities which are directly related to per­ mitted livestock grazing activities in the Wolf Creek Drainage on the Toiyabe National Forest in the same manner and degree in which such access was occurring as of the date of enactment of this title; (3)scertain lands in the Shasta-Trinity National Forest, Cali­ 16 USC 1132 fornia, which comprise approximately seven thousand three note.
    [Show full text]
  • Lassen National Forest Over-Snow Vehicle Use Designation Draft Environmental Impact Statement
    United States Department of Agriculture Lassen National Forest Over-snow Vehicle Use Designation Draft Environmental Impact Statement Forest Lassen January 2016 Service National Forest In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding Northeast California
    BIRDING NORTHEAST CALIFORNIA 24 June – 1 July 2013 A birding and ornithological research trip to raise funds for Western Field Ornithologists nevadensis Sage Sparrow, © Bob Lewis Dates: Monday, June 24 through Monday, July 1, 2013 Locale: Northeast California, beginning and ending in Reno, NV Leaders: Ken Able, Jon Dunn, Lena Yee Hayashi, and Dave Quady ( Price: $ 1,950 for double-occupancy lodging from June 24 through July 1. This price includes all breakfasts, lunches, and snacks; one picnic dinner, and the farewell dinner in Reno. Price also includes non-alcoholic beverages, guide services, and van transportation throughout the trip. We require at least ten participants to ensure that the trip will run. If you have a roommate, please indicate this when you register. If you do not have a roommate but are willing to share, please indicate this, and we will try to pair you with someone. If you prefer a single room or if we cannot pair you with a roommate, there will be a surcharge of $200 for the trip. You will receive an email notice when registration is open. The date when Western Field Ornithologists will first accept your registration depends upon your membership level: January 24 for Patrons or Life members, January 31 for other membership levels, and February 7 for non-members. Register on-line with a $500 deposit, which will be returned less $100 if you cancel prior to April 1. Your deposit will be forfeited if you cancel after April 1 and we are unable to fill your place on the trip. The balance of the trip cost is due by May 1 and you will receive a notice in mid-April.
    [Show full text]