Asteroids-For-All

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Asteroids-For-All ASTEROIDS-FOR-ALL: BUILDING AN OPEN-SOURCE ASTEROID DETECTION LINKING SOFTWARE by Nicole Tan Jieyi Submitted to Wellesley College in Partial Fulfillment of the Prerequisite for Honors in Astrophysics under the advisement of Carrie Nugent and Kim McLeod May 2020 © Copyright by NICOLE TAN JIEYI, 2020 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I’d like to acknowledge that this work was partially written during the 2019-2020 coronavirus pandemic. My gratitude to everyone that I will mention below is infinitely greater because of it; despite the challenging conditions of countless back and forth emails, Zoom calls, scheduling conflicts with respect to a 12 hour time difference and the general state of the world, everyone has been immensely accommodating and kind in pushing me through the final stages of the thesis process. I’d like to express my deepest gratitude to my off-campus advisor, Professor Carrie Nu- gent at Olin College, for first taking me on as a summer student and then taking on the huge responsibility of becoming my thesis advisor over the academic year. Thank you for introducing me to the world (no pun intended) of asteroids and Solar System objects. I cannot begin to thank you enough for everything you’ve done for me, and I will miss our weekly thesis meetings. Thank you to my on-campus advisor, Professor Kim McLeod, for being incredibly sup- portive throughout the entire thesis process. Thank you for all your comments and advice through the different thesis drafts, and your continued faith in my abilities—not just during this thesis process, but throughout my four years at Wellesley. Many thanks to the rest of my thesis committee for not just their time in reviewing my thesis, but also for their individual contributions to my time here at Wellesley. Professor James Battat, for his role as my major advisor and a source of continued guidance; Professor Wes Watters, for his help in crafting my KNAC presentation on my initial summer work for this project; and Professor Lisa Rodensky, who deserves credit for any semblance of good writing I’ve done (and I am sorry for all the passive voice constructions). ii Thanks also to my friends and family. The Astro Squad, Maura Shea and Karisa Zdanky, for all the laughs (and tears) during our shared struggles through the astrophysics major. Laurel Stickney, my roommate of four years, for all the interesting conversations, both pro- found and nonsensical, that have acted as a sounding board for most of my ideas. My family for supporting me through this journey, and for leaving me (mostly) alone to write this. This work would not have been possible without Bill Gray’s wonderful software, Find_Orb. Thank you for putting it out there for all to use, and for your continuous updates, meticulous documentation and extremely helpful answers to all my questions, from software installation to orbital mechanics. This research has made use of data and services provided by the International Astronom- ical Union’s Minor Planet Center, and has made use of the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive, which is funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and oper- ated by the California Institute of Technology. The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys (PS1) and the PS1 public science archive have been made possible through contributions by the Institute for Astronomy, the University of Hawaii, the Pan-STARRS Project Office, the Max-Planck Society and its participating institutes, the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Heidelberg and the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching, The Johns Hopkins University, Durham University, the University of Edinburgh, the Queen’s University Belfast, the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, the Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network Incorporated, the National Central University of Taiwan, the Space Tele- scope Science Institute, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under Grant No. NNX08AR22G issued through the Planetary Science Division of the NASA Science Mission Directorate, the National Science Foundation Grant No. AST-1238877, the University of Maryland, Eotvos Lorand University (ELTE), the Los Alamos National Laboratory, and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. iii ASTEROIDS-FOR-ALL: BUILDING AN OPEN-SOURCE ASTEROID DETECTION LINKING SOFTWARE by Nicole Tan Jieyi, B.A. Wellesley College May 2020 ABSTRACT We developed the first free and open-source asteroid detection linking software for use with time-series sky survey data. It takes cleaned Source Extractor outputs of non-stationary de- tections from the images and finds tracklets representing asteroid motion within them. The linking software is a Python-based program that incorporates Find_Orb, an orbit determi- nation program by Bill Gray. The bulk of the program identifies candidate tracklets based on exposure-to-exposure object movement. The program runs through all possible combi- nations of observation linkages, feeds possible tracklets through Find_Orb, and identifies candidate tracklets based on user-defined criteria including angular speed, angle between detections and mean residuals from Find_Orb. We tested the software with data from the Near-Earth Asteroid Tracking (NEAT) survey and from the Palomar Transient Factory (PTF). For NEAT tests with artificial noise added, we found that the code performed ideally for noise levels up to 80%. In the PTF tests, we discovered a previously unreported asteroid position. Subsequently, we have submitted this tracklet to the Minor Planet Center. Our trials show that under ideal conditions, the linking software is able to perform on par with the linking capabilities of the NEAT and PTF systems, which have a more complex design. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................... ii ABSTRACT ....................................... iv LIST OF TABLES .................................... ix LIST OF FIGURES ................................... xi CHAPTER 1 Introduction .................................... 1 1.1 Project overview................................ 1 1.2 Overview of asteroids............................. 1 1.2.1 Small body taxonomy......................... 1 1.3 Asteroid significance ............................. 4 1.3.1 Clues to the past ........................... 4 1.3.2 Keys to further space exploration .................. 5 1.3.3 A potential hazard........................... 5 1.4 Detection method............................... 7 1.4.1 Introduction to asteroid surveys................... 7 1.4.2 Detection linking ........................... 9 1.5 Scope of work................................. 10 1.5.1 Expected inputs and outputs..................... 10 1.5.2 Purpose ................................ 11 CHAPTER 2 Methods ...................................... 13 2.1 Software overview............................... 13 v 2.2 Find_Orb................................... 13 2.2.1 Purpose ................................ 13 2.2.2 Find_Orb method........................... 14 2.2.3 Find_Orb limitations......................... 15 2.3 Tracklet Screening............................... 16 2.3.1 Data handling............................. 16 2.3.2 Software parameters.......................... 18 2.3.3 Recursion................................ 20 2.3.4 Screening passes............................ 22 CHAPTER 3 Code testing with NEAT ............................ 23 3.1 NEAT overview................................ 23 3.2 NEAT data .................................. 23 3.3 Code modifications for NEAT ........................ 24 3.4 Noise addition................................. 25 3.5 Findings.................................... 26 CHAPTER 4 Applications to PTF data ........................... 29 4.1 PTF overview................................. 29 4.2 Accessing PTF data.............................. 29 4.3 Star removal.................................. 30 4.3.1 Accessing Pan-STARRS data..................... 30 4.3.2 Code for star removal......................... 31 4.4 Trials...................................... 31 4.4.1 Testing on 20’ PTF data ....................... 32 CHAPTER 5 Conclusions .................................... 35 APPENDIX A ............................................ 41 A.1 Code...................................... 41 A.1.1 linking_library.py........................... 41 vi A.1.2 add_library.py............................. 55 A.1.3 FindPOTATOs.py........................... 66 vii LIST OF TABLES 1.1 Types of objects at hypothetical distances and their calculated orbital and angular speed, rounded to two significant figures. ............... 4 1.2 Specifications for the Near-Earth Asteroid Tracking (NEAT), Palomar Tran- sient Factory (PTF), and Outer Solar System Origins Survey (OSSOS) sur- veys, taken from Pravdo et al.(1999), Law et al.(2009) and Bannister et al. (2016). The streak limits for NEAT and PTF are calculated based on pixel size and exposure. For seeing-limited OSSOS, the streak limit is based on exposure and an assumed 2" seeing........................ 8 ix LIST OF FIGURES 1.1 MOID is a measure of the distance between the closest point of two orbits. This diagram shows the Earth MOID for a hypothetical NEO......... 6 1.2 An example of a tracklet found by the Catalina Sky Survey. These three images of asteroid 2010RX30 are of the same field of the sky. From exposure to exposure, most sources are stationary, except for detections of the asteroid (circled). This series of three detections is a tracklet. ............. 9 2.1 θ measurement in relation to the three detections ............... 19 2.2 Overview of the main
Recommended publications
  • Barrett Senate Confirmation Hearings Begin Republicans Praise Nominee As Democrats Cast Judge As a Threat to ‘Obamacare’ Page 7
    VIRUS OUTBREAK NBA FINALS Stuttgart steps up virus Scientists say virus may Lakers defeat Heat restrictions after spike stay on touch screens, in Game 6 to capture puts city on red alert banknotes for weeks record-tying 17th title Page 4 Page 5 Back page US hits Taliban with airstrikes in Afghanistan’s Helmand province » Page 3 stripes.com Volume 79, No. 127 ©SS 2020 TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2020 50¢/Free to Deployed Areas Barrett Senate confirmation hearings begin Republicans praise nominee as Democrats cast judge as a threat to ‘Obamacare’ Page 7 Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett is sworn in during a confirmation hearing Monday before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington. PATRICK SEMANSKY / AP First monument honoring military women at Arlington to be unveiled BY NIKKI WENTLING said Phyllis Wilson, president of ors all military women. Stars and Stripes the Women in Military Service The monument, titled The for America Memorial Founda- Pledge, will be unveiled during a WASHINGTON — The Women tion and a retired chief warrant ceremony Saturday. In bronze, it in Military Service for America officer. depicts a service woman outfitted Memorial, at the gateway to Ar- for combat, kneeling and staring lington National Cemetery, is The memorial has been closed for about seven months during face-to-face with a military work- regularly placed on lists of “hid- ing dog. The base of the monu- den gems” within the nation’s the coronavirus pandemic. It re- ment says it honors “all women capital — a perspective on the opens Oct. 18 with a new feature of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 1, #1 2021 May 14 Published on Behalf of the International Astronomical Union by the WG Small Bodies Nomenclature
    Volume 1, #1 2021 May 14 Published on behalf of the International Astronomical Union by the WG Small Bodies Nomenclature. ISSN <applied for> Cover image: Navigation image of (1) Ceres, obtained by the DAWN mission. Courtesy NASA/JPL-CALTECH. WGSBN Bull. 1, #1 Table of Contents Editorial Notice.....................................................................................................................8 New Names of Minor Planets...............................................................................................8 (3708) Socus = 1974 FV1...............................................................................................9 (4035) Thestor = 1986 WD1...........................................................................................9 (4489) Dracius = 1988 AK..............................................................................................9 (4715) Medesicaste = 1989 TS1.....................................................................................9 (5258) Rhoeo = 1989 AU1..............................................................................................9 (5311) Rutherford = 1981 GD1.......................................................................................9 (5346) Benedetti = 1981 QE3.........................................................................................9 (5648) Axius = 1990 VU1...............................................................................................9 (5766) Carmelofalco = 1986 QR3..................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Report
    2013 IAA Planetary Defense Conference Conference report Background The 2013 IAA Planetary Defense Conference: Gathering for Impact! was held in Flagstaff, Arizona, USA, on April 15-19, and included a special session on Sunday evening, April 14, on the Chelyabinsk Meteor event of February 15, 2013. The conference, which became part of the International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) conference series in 2009, was the fifth in the series of conferences that began in 2004. Pervious conference locations were in Anaheim, California (2004), Washington, D.C. (2007), Granada, Spain (2009), and Bucharest, Romania (2011). As was the case for previous conferences, the 2013 conference brought together world experts to discuss our current understanding of asteroids and comets that might pose an impact threat to our planet, techniques that might be used to deflect or disrupt an oncoming object, the design of deflection campaigns, consequences of an impact, and political and policy issues that might affect a decision to take action. A tabletop exercise on the last day of the conference asked attendees to consider deflection and disaster mitigation responses to a hypothetical asteroid impact threat. The Organizing Committee for the conference is provided in Attachment A. The Flagstaff conference was sponsored by 23 organizations that are listed in Attachment B and was attended by over 225 individuals (see Attachment C). Both the number of sponsoring organizations and the number of attendees have grown over time, as shown in Fig 1. This increase demonstrates the expanding recognition that defending Earth from asteroids and comets is an important issue for our time. Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Masiero Curriculum Vitae
    Joseph Masiero Curriculum Vitae Contact Caltech/IPAC Information 1200 E. California Blvd MC 100-22 E-mail: [email protected] Pasadena, CA 91125 USA Research Asteroid physical properties Interests Asteroid families Numerical simulations of Solar system evolution Imaging polarimetry Thermal models of Solar system objects Polarimetric instrumentation and characterization Education & public outreach Education University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI USA Ph.D., Institute for Astronomy, September 2009 • Thesis Topic: \Using rotation and polarization to probe the composition and surface properties of main belt asteroids" • Advisor: Dr. Robert Jedicke M.S., Institute for Astronomy, December 2006 The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA USA B.S., Astronomy & Astrophysics, June 2004 Employment Solar System Scientist Caltech/IPAC Oct 2020 to present Deputy Principal Investigator NEOWISE Jun 2017 to present Group Supervisor Small Bodies of the Solar System Group Mar 2019 to Sept 2020 Scientist Jet Propulsion Laboratory Oct 2012 to Sept 2020 NASA Postdoctoral Fellow Jet Propulsion Laboratory Oct 2009 to Sept 2012 Research Assistant Institute for Astronomy University of Hawaii May 2005 to Sept 2009 Teaching Assistant Dept of Physics and Astronomy University of Hawaii Aug 2004 to May 2005 Research Assistant Dept of Astronomy & Astrophysics Pennsylvania State University Jan 2001 to Aug 2004 1 Mission Team Memberships NEOCam/NEO Surveillance Misson Investigation Team Member NEOWISE Science Team Member Advising Jennifer Bragg, JPL
    [Show full text]
  • Goals and Objectives for the Exploration and Investigation of the Solar System’S Small Bodies
    Goals and Objectives for the Exploration and Investigation of the Solar System’s Small Bodies Small Bodies Assessment Group (SBAG) Version 1.2.2016 March 4, 2016 Recommended citation: SBAG (2016), Goals and Objectives for the Exploration and Investigation of the Solar System’s Small Bodies. ver. 1.2.2016, 41 p, at http://www.lpi.usra.edu/sbag/goals/ Goals and Objectives for the Exploration and Investigation of the Solar System’s Small Bodies Small Bodies Assessment Group (SBAG) Revision # Date Notes 1.0.2015 Nov. 20, 2015 Draft for review by committees 1.1.2016 Jan. 6, 2016 Draft for review by SBAG community 1.2.2016 March 4, 2016 Final version posted 2016 SBAG Chair and Goals Document Lead: Nancy L. Chabot, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Goal 1 – Small Bodies, Big Science: 2016 Lead: Tim Swindle, University of Arizona 2016 Committee: Kieran Carroll (Gedex); Julie Castillo-Rogez (JPL); Will Grundy (Lowell Observatory); Emily Kramer (JPL); Joe Nuth (NASA Goddard); Carol Raymond (JPL); Andy Rivkin (APL); Heather Smith (NASA Ames) Goal 2 – Defend Planet Earth: 2016 Lead: Tommy Grav, Planetary Science Institute 2016 Committee: James Arnold (NASA Ames); Brent Barbee (NASA Goddard); Steve Chesley (JPL); Paul Chodas (JPL); Leviticus A. Lewis (FEMA); Paul Miller (LLNL); Angela Stickle (APL); Timothy Titus (USGS) Goal 3 – Enable Human Exploration: 2016 Lead: Paul Abell, NASA Johnson Space Center 2016 Committee: Brent Barbee (NASA Goddard); Josh Hopkins (Lockheed Martin); Sam Lawrence (Arizona State University); Stan Love (NASA Johnson Space Center); Carrie Nugent (IPAC); Andy Rivkin (APL); Mark Sykes (PSI) Given the regularly occurring advancements that relate to our knowledge of the Solar System’s small bodies, updates and reviews to this document are planned on a yearly basis, with input solicited from the entire SBAG community.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Department Newsletter (PDF)
    EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCES 2009 NEWSLETTER 2009 EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCES NEWSLETTER 1 GREETINGS FROM THE CHAIR: The last year has been a busy time in the department. We welcomed four new In this issue: faculty members, with several more on the way. On top of exciting new research results out of the department, we’ve enjoyed visits from alumni at several events over the year. A number of our members received some of the highest honors in their fields. We also gave ourselves a facelift – please visit our new and improved Greetings from website at www.ess.ucla.edu. the Chair—2 ESS recently partnered with the Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences and the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics in the “Geosciences ESS in the News—3 Initiative”, which is bringing in new faculty with interests in planetary science, and in the surface envelopes of the Earth and planets. Starting in 2009, the new faculty hired under this initiative began to arrive, including David Jewitt, Welcome New Faculty— 4 Edward Rhodes, Jean-Luc Margot, and Jonathan Mitchell. You can read about their research and plans on pages 4-7. Meanwhile, after many years of valued service and research success, faculty member Margaret Kivelson retired on October ESS Events—8 31. Fortunately, she will continue her research and student mentoring here at UCLA. Visit our Facebook page (see page Donor Recognition—9 8) for photos of the retirement party, including replicas of Dorothy’s red slippers. 2009 was a banner year for recognition of ESS faculty. Awards and Accolades—10 Mark Harrison received the 2009 Arthur L.
    [Show full text]
  • Fake Asteroid? Nasa Expert Ids Mystery Object As Old
    Page 2 Wednesday, October 14, 2020 Wednesday, October 14, 2020 Page 19 Daily Court Review Daily Court Review Talking Points TalkingTalking PointsPoints A weekly section to spur conversation CIRCUS SCHOOL IN FULL SWING AGAIN, DESPITE COVID By Francisco Seco | The Associated Press The ropes are swinging. Chalk stains the mats anew. And stu- dents at the ESAC international circus school in Brussels are smiling again, even if it is through a mask sometimes. The pandemic forced the school to close in March, but with new measures in place to limit exposure the smell of sweat and the grunts of exertion are back again. "We are still training and working as hard as we always do," said second-year student Sidney Billings, 20, enjoying the oppor- tunity to hone her athletic talents again. Those who pick a circus career are so driven, they were quick to get rid of the rust. "The students were excited to come back to work on a regular basis and to regain contact with teachers or project managers" said Spanish dance teacher Silvia Ubieta, 49, who joined the school in 2007. For safety reasons amid the pandemic, Venezuelan school director Reynaldo Ramperssad had to cut the number of stu- dents by 25%, creating "bubbles" where only a few work together in a small group and do online theory classes. Only technical classes are face-to-face at the school facilities, where the use of masks depends on an official sports protocol. It creates scenes where one student is hanging upside down with a white mask on while others are swinging with only a smile to cover their face.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Spectral Clustering Analysis of the Surface Composition of a Known Asteroid
    52nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2021 (LPI Contrib. No. 2548) 1375.pdf Exploring the Spectral Clustering Analysis of the Surface Composition of a Known Asteroid. M. Fuentes-Quiñones1, X. Arvelo1, A.A. Ayala1, B. Rivera-Muñiz2, J. Colón2, and C. Mercado 1The Arecibo Observatory (STAR Academy) ([email protected]), 2The Arecibo Observatory (UAGM). Introduction: This project was completed as part and can be considered as prospects for future space of the requirements for graduation at STAR Academy at exploration and colonization. Understanding the surface The Arecibo Observatory as a high school level composition of asteroids is essential for the continuation investigation with the purpose of exposing students to of space exploration and the expansion of our real scientific research. The main goal for this project knowledge of the universe itself. was to explore the spectral clustering analysis of the surface of an asteroid. On September 8, 2016, NASA launched a space mission OSIRIS-Rex. The mission had the goal of sending and landing a spacecraft on the surface of near-Earth asteroid 101955 Bennu (formerly known as 1999 RQ36) to collect a sample of about 2.1 ounces and return it to Earth. On October 20, 2020, the spacecraft successfully landed on asteroid Bennu. The type of asteroid Bennu (B-Type, containing much carbon) was re-confirmed. The instrument also took a considerable sample from the surface. This undertaking Figure 1: Clustered image of Octavia and Oppia was a significant development for space exploration. Craters from Asteroid 4 Vesta The mission had an expected cost of $1.16 billion [1], being a high cost mission for NASA.
    [Show full text]
  • The NEO Surveys Don Yeomans Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California
    The NEO Surveys Don Yeomans Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive m/s 301‐121, Pasadena CA 91109‐8099, Phone: (818) 354‐2127, Email: [email protected] Keywords: Near‐Earth objects, discovery surveys Introduction Over the last 15 years, Near‐Earth Object (NEO) surveys have been extremely successful finding more than 90% of the Near‐Earth Asteroids (NEAs) larger than one kilometer and about 40% of the NEAs larger than 140 meters. The vast majority of NEO discoveries have been due to NASA‐supported ground‐based telescopic surveys including the Catalina Sky Survey (CSS) and Spacewatch near Tucson Arizona, the LINEAR project near Socorro New Mexico, Pans‐STARRS1 on Haleakala, Maui, Hawaii, LONEOS near Flagstaff Arizona and the NEAT project run by NASA/JPL. Using a near‐infrared space telescope in an Earth polar orbit, the NEOWISE project was actively discovering and characterizing NEOs for ten months in 2010 before its cryogens were exhausted. It continued another four months into early 2011 as a post‐cryogenic mission. The LONEOS and NEAT surveys have been terminated and Spacewatch is now primarily a follow‐up facility. The Discovery Surveys The Catalina Sky Survey (CSS), based at the University of Arizona, is the current frontrunner in terms of NEO discoveries, an achievement that is due, in large part, to their comprehensive sky coverage, human attention to potential discovery images and on site follow‐up observation capabilities. In 2012 alone, CSS discovered more than 625 NEOs. Some 20% of CSS observing time is devoted to the post‐discovery, follow‐up observations that allow the object’s orbit to become secure.
    [Show full text]
  • NEAT: the Next Generation
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 13, EPSC-DPS2019-998-1, 2019 EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC Attribution 4.0 license. NEAT: The Next Generation Carrie Nugent (1), Gerbs Bauer (2) (1) Olin College of Engineering, Massachusetts, USA ([email protected]) (2) University of Maryland, Maryland, USA Abstract moving objects. Follow-up observations of new dis- coveries were also conducted. The survey generally The Near-Earth Asteroid Tracking (NEAT) survey dis- covered more than six thousand square degrees each covered 41,227 minor planets [3, 5], and reported ob- month, avoiding the galactic plane, and prioritizing servations of 258 comets. It operated from 1995 to opposition. Weather permitting, NEAT operated in a 2007. It pioneered techniques used by major asteroid series of six-night runs. An example search pattern surveys today, along with Spacewatch [6]. from [5] is shown in Figure 1. Areas of the sky im- Although NEAT was highly successful, it operated aged during the first night were again imaged on the within the technological constraints of its time. In the sixth night so that slow moving objects could be de- intervening years, computer hardware and data analy- tected. sis tools have advanced significantly. We harness this new technology to reprocess these images. We expect our reprocessing of the NEAT data to in- 2 Benefits of Reprocessing crease NEAT near-Earth Object (NEO) detections by >150%. The reprocessing will produce accurate pho- Current technology enables many improvements in tometric measurements of NEOs, giving a long base- data processing. Dynamic source extraction software line of these observations, as well as observations over can determine the background of the image and divide different time scales (minutes, hours, days, weeks).
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal Aspects of Permanent Human Settlement on Celestial Bodies
    The Legal Aspects of Permanent Human Settlement on Celestial Bodies Aram Daniel Kerkonian Institute of Air and Space Law Faculty of Law, McGill University Montréal, Quebec October 2017 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Masters of Laws (LLM). © Aram Daniel Kerkonian 2017 Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... ii Chapter 1: Settling the Cosmos ............................................................................................ 2 Crawling Out of the Cradle of Civilization ........................................................................... 2 The Definition of Settlement ............................................................................................ 2 The Necessity of Settlement ............................................................................................. 5 The Human Species in Space and Time ................................................................................ 6 The Value of Species Survivability ...................................................................................... 7 Extinction Risks Associated with Single Settlements ................................................................ 8 Cosmological: Asteroid Collisions .................................................................................
    [Show full text]