DOCSLIB.ORG

United Nations Environment Programme

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United Nations Environment Programme EP United Nations Environment Programme UNEP(DEPI)/MED WG 331/6 11 May 2009 ENGLISH ORIGINAL: FRENCH MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN Ninth Meeting of Focal Points for SPAs Floriana, Malta, 3-6 June 2009 Proposals for amendment of Annexes II and III of the SPA/BD Protocol UNEP RAC/SPA - Tunis, 2009 Note : The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP concerning the legal status of any State, Territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of their frontiers or boundaries. © 2009 United Nations Environment Programme Mediterranean Action Plan Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA) Boulevard du leader Yasser Arafat B.P.337 –1080 Tunis CEDEX E-mail : [email protected] UNEP(DEPI)/MED WG.331/6 Page 1 Table of contents MODIFICATION OF THE LIST OF SPECIES OF ANNEX II .................................................. 5 PROPOSALS FOR ADDING NEW SPECIES ....................................................................... 9 Macrophytes Species ............................................................................................................ 9 Species concerned : Cymodocea nodosa (Ucria) Ascherson ........................................11 Species concerned : Cystoseira abies-marina (S.G. Gmelin) C. Agardh ......................14 Species concerned : Cystoseira algeriensis Feldmann ..................................................17 Species concerned : Cystoseira barbata (Stackhouse) C. Agardh var. barbata et var. tophuloidea (Ercegovic) Giaccone .................................................................................20 Species concerned : Cystoseira barbatula Kützing emend. Cormaci, G. Furnari et Giaccone .......................................................................................................................23 Species concerned : Cystoseira brachycarpa J. Agardh emend. Giaccone var. brachycarpa et var. claudiae (Giaccone) Giaccone .......................................................26 Species concerned : Cystoseira corniculata (Turner) Zanardini .....................................29 Species concerned : Cystoseira crinita Duby .................................................................32 Species concerned : Cystoseira crinitophylla Ercegovic ................................................35 Species concerned : Cystoseira dubia Valiante .............................................................38 Species concerned : Cystoseira elegans Sauvageau ....................................................41 Species concerned : Cystoseira foeniculacea (Linnaeus) Greville f. foeniculacea et f. latiramosa (Ercegovic) A. Gòmez Garreta et al. ; f. tenuiramosa (Ercegovic) A. Gòmez Garreta et al. ; f. schiffneri (Hamel) A. Gòmez Garreta et al. .........................................44 Species concerned : Cystoseira funkii Schiffner ex Gerloff et Nizamuddin ....................47 Species concerned: Cystoseira humilis Schousboe ex Kützing var. humilis et Cystoseira humilis var. myriophylloides (Sauvageau) J.H. Price & D.M. John .................................50 Species concerned : Cystoseira hyblaea Giaccone .......................................................53 Species concerned : Cystoseira jabukae Ercegovic ......................................................56 Species concerned : Cystoseira nodicaulis (Withering) M. Roberts ..............................59 Species concerned : Cystoseira pelagosae Ercegovic ..................................................62 Species concerned : Cystoseira rayssiae E. Ramon .....................................................65 Species concerned : Cystoseira sauvageauana Hamel var. sauvageauana & var. polyoedematis Sauvageau ............................................................................................68 Species concerned : Cystoseira squarrosa De Notaris ..................................................71 UNEP(DEPI)/MED WG.331/6 Page 2 Species concerned : Cystoseira susanensis Nizamuddin ..............................................74 Species concerned : Cystoseira tamariscifolia (Hudson) Papenfuss .............................77 Species concerned : Cystoseira usneoides (Linnaeus) M. Roberts ...............................80 Species concerned : Fucus virsoides J. Agardh ............................................................83 Species concerned : Gymnogongrus crenulatus (Turner) J. Agardh 1851 .....................86 Species concerned : Kallymenia spathulata (J. Agardh) Codomier ex P.G. Parkinson ..89 Species concerned : Sargassum acinarium (Linnaeus) Setchell ....................................92 Species concerned : Sargassum flavifolium Kützing ......................................................95 Species concerned : Sargassum hornschuchii C. Agardh .............................................98 Species concerned : Sargassum trichocarpum J. Agardh............................................ 101 Species concerned : Sphaerococcus rhizophylloides J.J. Rodríguez 1895 .................. 104 Species concerned : Tenarea tortuosa (Esper) Lemoine 1910 ................................... 107 Species concerned : Titanoderma trochanter (Bory) Benhissoune, Boudouresque, Perret-Boudouresque et Verlaque ............................................................................... 110 Cartilaginous Fish Species ................................................................................................. 114 Species concerned: Alopias vulpinus (Bonnaterre, 1788) ............................................ 116 Species concerned: Carcharhinus plumbeus (Nardo, 1827) ........................................ 122 Species concerned: Carcharias taurus (Rafinesque, 1810) ......................................... 128 Species concerned: Centrophorus granulosus (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) .................. 133 Species concerned: Dipturus batis (Linnaeus, 1758) ................................................... 138 Species concerned: Galeorhinus galeus (Linnaeus, 1758) .......................................... 144 Species concerned: Gymnura altavela (Linnaeus, 1758) ............................................. 150 Species concerned: Heptranchias perlo (Bonnaterre, 1788) ........................................ 154 Species concerned: Isurus oxyrinchus (Rafinesque, 1810) ......................................... 158 Species concerned: Lamna nasus (Bonnaterre, 1788) ................................................ 165 Species concerned: Leucoraja circularis (Couch, 1838) .............................................. 170 Species concerned: Leucoraja melitensis (Clark, 1926) .............................................. 174 Species concerned: Mustelus spp: Mustelus asterias (Cloquet, 1821), Mustelus mustelus (Linnaeus, 1758) Mustelus punctulatus (Risso, 1826) .................................. 178 Species concerned: Odontaspis ferox (Risso, 1810) ................................................... 184 Species concerned: Oxynotus centrina (Linnaeus, 1758) ............................................ 189 Species concerned: Pristis spp - Pristis pectinata (Latham, 1794); Pristis pristis (Linnaeus, 1758) ......................................................................................................... 193 Species concerned: Raja undulata (Lacepède, 1802) ................................................. 197 UNEP(DEPI)/MED WG.331/6 Page 3 Species concerned: Rhinobatos spp - Rhinobatos cemiculus (E. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1817); Rhinobatos rhinobatos (Linnaeus, 1758) .......................................................... 202 Species concerned: Rostroraja alba (Lacepède, 1803) ............................................... 208 Species concerned: Sphyrna spp: Sphyrna lewini (Griffith & Smith, 1834). Sphyrna mokarran (Rüppell, 1837) Sphyrna zygaena (Linnaeus 1758) ..................................... 213 Species concerned: Squalus acanthias (Linnaeus, 1758) ............................................ 219 Species concerned: Squatina spp: Squatina aculeata (Dumeril, in Cuvier, 1817), Squatina oculata (Bonaparte, 1840) Squatina squatina (Linnaeus, 1758), .................. 224 Marine and coastal Bird Species ........................................................................................ 230 Species concerned: Ceryle r. rudis (Linnaeus, 1758) .................................................. 231 Species concerned: Charadrius. alexandrinus (Linnaeus, 1758) ................................. 234 Species concerned: Charadrius leschenaultii columbines (Lesson, 1826) ................... 237 Species concerned: Halcyons. smyrnensis (Linnaeus, 1758) ...................................... 240 Species concerned: Larus armenicus (Buturlin,1934) .................................................. 243 Species concerned: Larus genei (Breme, 1839) .......................................................... 246 Species concerned: Larus melanocephalus (Temminck, 1820) ................................... 249 Species concerned : Puffinus mauretanicus (Lowe, PR, 1921).................................... 252 Species concerned: Sterna caspia (Pallas,1770) ........................................................ 256 Species concerned: Sterna nilotica (Gmelin, JF,1789) ................................................ 258 UNEP(DEPI)/MED WG.331/6 Page 4 UNEP(DEPI)/MED WG.331/6 Page 5 MODIFICATION OF THE LIST OF SPECIES OF ANNEX II In view of the taxonomic changes which occurred since the establishment of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • References Please Help Making This Preliminary List As Complete As Possible!
    Cypraeidae - important references Please help making this preliminary list as complete as possible! ABBOTT, R.T. (1965) Cypraea arenosa Gray, 1825. Hawaiian Shell News 14(2):8 ABREA, N.S. (1980) Strange goings on among the Cypraea ziczac. Hawaiian Shell News 28 (5):4 ADEGOKE, O.S. (1973) Paleocene mollusks from Ewekoro, southern Nigeria. Malacologia 14:19-27, figs. 1-2, pls. 1-2. ADEGOKE, O.S. (1977) Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Ewekoro Formation (Paleocene) of southeastern Nigeria. Bulletins of American Paleontology 71(295):1-379, figs. 1-6, pls. 1-50. AIKEN, R. P. (2016) Description of two undescribed subspecies and one fossil species of the Genus Cypraeovula Gray, 1824 from South Africa. Beautifulcowries Magazine 8: 14-22 AIKEN, R., JOOSTE, P. & ELS, M. (2010) Cypraeovula capensis - A specie of Diversity and Beauty. Strandloper 287 p. 16 ff AIKEN, R., JOOSTE, P. & ELS, M. (2014) Cypraeovula capensis. A species of diversity and beauty. Beautifulcowries Magazine 5: 38–44 ALLAN, J. (1956) Cowry Shells of World Seas. Georgian House, Melbourne, Australia, 170 p., pls. 1-15. AMANO, K. (1992) Cypraea ohiroi and its associated molluscan species from the Miocene Kadonosawa Formation, northeast Japan. Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum 19:405-411, figs. 1-2, pl. 57. ANCEY, C.F. (1901) Cypraea citrina Gray. The Nautilus 15(7):83. ANONOMOUS. (1971) Malacological news. La Conchiglia 13(146-147):19-20, 5 unnumbered figs. ANONYMOUS. (1925) Index and errata. The Zoological Journal. 1: [593]-[603] January. ANONYMOUS. (1889) Cypraea venusta Sowb. The Nautilus 3(5):60. ANONYMOUS. (1893) Remarks on a new species of Cypraea.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Rare Cystoseira Species Along the Montenegro Coast (South-Eastern Adriatic Sea)
    PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM UDC 57:61 VOL. 117, No 3, 441–447, 2015 CODEN PDBIAD DOI: 10.18054/pb.2015.117.3.2995 ISSN 0031-5362 short communication Distribution of rare Cystoseira species along the Montenegro coast (South-Eastern Adriatic Sea) Abstract VESNA MAČIĆ1 2 BORIS ANTOLIĆ Background and purpose: Multiple studies have shown that Cystoseira 1 Institute of marine biology, Dobrota b.b. species are sensitive to anthropogenic impact, and a decrease in their popula- 85330 Kotor, Montenegro tions was observed, especially close to urban areas. To better understand E-mail: [email protected] status of such endangered and protected species, we studied the distribution 2 Institut of oceanography and fisheries of six rare Cystoseira species along the Montenegro coast: C. compressa sub- [etali{te I. Me{trovi}a 63; 21000 Split, Croatia sp. pustulata, C. crinita, C. crinitophylla, C. sauvageauana, C. sqarrosa and C. tamariscifolia. Keywords: Adriatic Sea, biodiversity, Cystoseira, Materials and methods: The study is based on field researches con- regression ducted through snorkelling and scuba diving along the Montenegrin coast during the period 1998-2009. In addition to the field work, we examined the published data for these species and the unpublished data from prof. Boris Antolić’s field diary. Results: Based on our 12-year-long investigations, we concluded that C. compressa subsp. pustulata, C. crinita, C. crinitophylla and C. sqarrosa are rare and endangered species along the Montenegro coast. Conclusions: The published data for C. sauvageauana is likely mistaken due to incomplete and poorly conserved algal material, while regarding the reference for C. tamariscifolia should be checked if the collected sample was preserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Number of Living Species in Australia and the World
    Numbers of Living Species in Australia and the World 2nd edition Arthur D. Chapman Australian Biodiversity Information Services australia’s nature Toowoomba, Australia there is more still to be discovered… Report for the Australian Biological Resources Study Canberra, Australia September 2009 CONTENTS Foreword 1 Insecta (insects) 23 Plants 43 Viruses 59 Arachnida Magnoliophyta (flowering plants) 43 Protoctista (mainly Introduction 2 (spiders, scorpions, etc) 26 Gymnosperms (Coniferophyta, Protozoa—others included Executive Summary 6 Pycnogonida (sea spiders) 28 Cycadophyta, Gnetophyta under fungi, algae, Myriapoda and Ginkgophyta) 45 Chromista, etc) 60 Detailed discussion by Group 12 (millipedes, centipedes) 29 Ferns and Allies 46 Chordates 13 Acknowledgements 63 Crustacea (crabs, lobsters, etc) 31 Bryophyta Mammalia (mammals) 13 Onychophora (velvet worms) 32 (mosses, liverworts, hornworts) 47 References 66 Aves (birds) 14 Hexapoda (proturans, springtails) 33 Plant Algae (including green Reptilia (reptiles) 15 Mollusca (molluscs, shellfish) 34 algae, red algae, glaucophytes) 49 Amphibia (frogs, etc) 16 Annelida (segmented worms) 35 Fungi 51 Pisces (fishes including Nematoda Fungi (excluding taxa Chondrichthyes and (nematodes, roundworms) 36 treated under Chromista Osteichthyes) 17 and Protoctista) 51 Acanthocephala Agnatha (hagfish, (thorny-headed worms) 37 Lichen-forming fungi 53 lampreys, slime eels) 18 Platyhelminthes (flat worms) 38 Others 54 Cephalochordata (lancelets) 19 Cnidaria (jellyfish, Prokaryota (Bacteria Tunicata or Urochordata sea anenomes, corals) 39 [Monera] of previous report) 54 (sea squirts, doliolids, salps) 20 Porifera (sponges) 40 Cyanophyta (Cyanobacteria) 55 Invertebrates 21 Other Invertebrates 41 Chromista (including some Hemichordata (hemichordates) 21 species previously included Echinodermata (starfish, under either algae or fungi) 56 sea cucumbers, etc) 22 FOREWORD In Australia and around the world, biodiversity is under huge Harnessing core science and knowledge bases, like and growing pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild About Learning
    WILD ABOUT LEARNING An Interdisciplinary Unit Fostering Discovery Learning Written on a 4th grade reading level, Wild Discoveries: Wacky New Animals, is perfect for every kid who loves wacky animals! With engaging full-color photos throughout, the book draws readers right into the animal action! Wild Discoveries features newly discovered species from around the world--such as the Shocking Pink Dragon and the Green Bomber. These wacky species are organized by region with fun facts about each one's amazing abilities and traits. The book concludes with a special section featuring new species discovered by kids! Heather L. Montgomery writes about science and nature for kids. Her subject matter ranges from snake tongues to snail poop. Heather is an award-winning teacher who uses yuck appeal to engage young minds. During a typical school visit, petrified parts and tree guts inspire reluctant writers and encourage scientific thinking. Heather has a B.S. in Biology and a M.S. in Environmental Education. When she is not writing, you can find her painting her face with mud at the McDowell Environmental Center where she is the Education Coordinator. Heather resides on the Tennessee/Alabama border. Learn more about her ten books at www.HeatherLMontgomery.com. Dear Teachers, Photo by Sonya Sones As I wrote Wild Discoveries: Wacky New Animals, I was astounded by how much I learned. As expected, I learned amazing facts about animals and the process of scientifically describing new species, but my knowledge also grew in subjects such as geography, math and language arts. I have developed this unit to share that learning growth with children.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklists of Crustacea Decapoda from the Canary and Cape Verde Islands, with an Assessment of Macaronesian and Cape Verde Biogeographic Marine Ecoregions
    Zootaxa 4413 (3): 401–448 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4413.3.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2DF9255A-7C42-42DA-9F48-2BAA6DCEED7E Checklists of Crustacea Decapoda from the Canary and Cape Verde Islands, with an assessment of Macaronesian and Cape Verde biogeographic marine ecoregions JOSÉ A. GONZÁLEZ University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, i-UNAT, Campus de Tafira, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]. ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8584-6731. Abstract The complete list of Canarian marine decapods (last update by González & Quiles 2003, popular book) currently com- prises 374 species/subspecies, grouped in 198 genera and 82 families; whereas the Cape Verdean marine decapods (now fully listed for the first time) are represented by 343 species/subspecies with 201 genera and 80 families. Due to changing environmental conditions, in the last decades many subtropical/tropical taxa have reached the coasts of the Canary Islands. Comparing the carcinofaunal composition and their biogeographic components between the Canary and Cape Verde ar- chipelagos would aid in: validating the appropriateness in separating both archipelagos into different ecoregions (Spalding et al. 2007), and understanding faunal movements between areas of benthic habitat. The consistency of both ecoregions is here compared and validated by assembling their decapod crustacean checklists, analysing their taxa composition, gath- ering their bathymetric data, and comparing their biogeographic patterns. Four main evidences (i.e. different taxa; diver- gent taxa composition; different composition of biogeographic patterns; different endemicity rates) support that separation, especially in coastal benthic decapods; and these parametres combined would be used as a valuable tool at comparing biotas from oceanic archipelagos.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with Birds Observed Off-Campus During BIOL3400 Field Course
    Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with birds observed off-campus during BIOL3400 Field course Photo Credit: Talton Cooper Species Descriptions and Photos by students of BIOL3400 Edited by Troy A. Ladine Photo Credit: Kenneth Anding Links to Tables, Figures, and Species accounts for birds observed during May-term course or winter bird counts. Figure 1. Location of Environmental Studies Area Table. 1. Number of species and number of days observing birds during the field course from 2005 to 2016 and annual statistics. Table 2. Compilation of species observed during May 2005 - 2016 on campus and off-campus. Table 3. Number of days, by year, species have been observed on the campus of ETBU. Table 4. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during the off-campus trips. Table 5. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during a winter count of birds on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Table 6. Species observed from 1 September to 1 October 2009 on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Alphabetical Listing of Birds with authors of accounts and photographers . A Acadian Flycatcher B Anhinga B Belted Kingfisher Alder Flycatcher Bald Eagle Travis W. Sammons American Bittern Shane Kelehan Bewick's Wren Lynlea Hansen Rusty Collier Black Phoebe American Coot Leslie Fletcher Black-throated Blue Warbler Jordan Bartlett Jovana Nieto Jacob Stone American Crow Baltimore Oriole Black Vulture Zane Gruznina Pete Fitzsimmons Jeremy Alexander Darius Roberts George Plumlee Blair Brown Rachel Hastie Janae Wineland Brent Lewis American Goldfinch Barn Swallow Keely Schlabs Kathleen Santanello Katy Gifford Black-and-white Warbler Matthew Armendarez Jordan Brewer Sheridan A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marine Life Information Network® for Britain and Ireland (Marlin)
    The Marine Life Information Network® for Britain and Ireland (MarLIN) Description, temporal variation, sensitivity and monitoring of important marine biotopes in Wales. Volume 1. Background to biotope research. Report to Cyngor Cefn Gwlad Cymru / Countryside Council for Wales Contract no. FC 73-023-255G Dr Harvey Tyler-Walters, Charlotte Marshall, & Dr Keith Hiscock With contributions from: Georgina Budd, Jacqueline Hill, Will Rayment and Angus Jackson DRAFT / FINAL REPORT January 2005 Reference: Tyler-Walters, H., Marshall, C., Hiscock, K., Hill, J.M., Budd, G.C., Rayment, W.J. & Jackson, A., 2005. Description, temporal variation, sensitivity and monitoring of important marine biotopes in Wales. Report to Cyngor Cefn Gwlad Cymru / Countryside Council for Wales from the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN). Marine Biological Association of the UK, Plymouth. [CCW Contract no. FC 73-023-255G] Description, sensitivity and monitoring of important Welsh biotopes Background 2 Description, sensitivity and monitoring of important Welsh biotopes Background The Marine Life Information Network® for Britain and Ireland (MarLIN) Description, temporal variation, sensitivity and monitoring of important marine biotopes in Wales. Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................................................5 Crynodeb gweithredol ........................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Oxygenated Acyclic Diterpenes with Anticancer Activity from the Irish Brown Seaweed Bifurcaria Bifurcata
    marine drugs Article Oxygenated Acyclic Diterpenes with Anticancer Activity from the Irish Brown Seaweed Bifurcaria bifurcata Vangelis Smyrniotopoulos 1, Christian Merten 2, Daria Firsova 1, Howard Fearnhead 3 and Deniz Tasdemir 1,4,5,* 1 School of Chemistry, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland; [email protected] (V.S.); dashafi[email protected] (D.F.) 2 Organische Chemie 2, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany; [email protected] 3 Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, H91 W2TY Galway, Ireland; [email protected] 4 GEOMAR Centre for Marine Biotechnology (GEOMAR-Biotech), Research Unit Marine Natural Product Chemistry, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Am Kiel-Kanal 44, 24106 Kiel, Germany 5 Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Kiel University, Christian-Albrechts-Platz 4, 24118 Kiel, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-431-600-4430 Received: 28 October 2020; Accepted: 19 November 2020; Published: 23 November 2020 Abstract: Brown alga Bifurcaria bifurcata is a prolific source of bioactive acyclic (linear) diterpenes with high structural diversity. In the continuation of our investigations on Irish brown algae, we undertook an in-depth chemical study on the n-hexanes and chloroform subextracts of B. bifurcata that led to isolation of six new (1–6) and two known (7–8) acyclic diterpenes. Chemical structures of the compounds were elucidated by a combination of 1D and 2D NMR, HRMS, FT-IR, [α]D and vibrational circular dichroism (VCD) spectroscopy. Compounds 1–8, as well as three additional linear diterpenes (9–11), which we isolated from the same seaweed before, were tested against the human breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231).
    [Show full text]
  • Imported Food Risk Statement Hijiki Seaweed and Inorganic Arsenic
    Imported food risk statement Hijiki seaweed and inorganic arsenic Commodity: Hijiki seaweed Alternative names used for Hijiki include: Sargassum fusiforme (formerly Hizikia fusiforme, Hizikia fusiformis, Crystophyllum fusiforme, Turbinaria fusiformis), Hizikia, Hiziki, Cystophyllum fusiforme, deer-tail grass, sheep- nest grass, chiau tsai, gulfweed, gulf weed ,hai ti tun, hai toe din, hai tsao, hai tso, hai zao, Hijiki, me-hijiki, mehijiki, hijaki, naga-hijiki, hoi tsou, nongmichae. Analyte: Inorganic arsenic Recommendation and rationale Is inorganic arsenic in Hijiki seaweed a medium or high risk to public health? Yes No Uncertain, further scientific assessment required Rationale: Inorganic arsenic is genotoxic and is known to be carcinogenic in humans. Acute toxicity can result from high dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic. General description Nature of the analyte: Arsenic is a metalloid that occurs in inorganic and organic forms. It is routinely found in the environment as a result of natural occurrence and anthropogenic (human) activity (WHO 2011a). While individuals are often exposed to organic and inorganic arsenic through the diet, it is the inorganic species (which include arsenate V and arsenite III) that are more toxic to humans. Only inorganic arsenic is known to be carcinogenic in humans (WHO 2011a). Inorganic arsenic contamination of groundwater is common in certain parts of the world. Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic occurs predominantly from groundwater derived drinking-water, groundwater used in cooking and commonly consumed foods such as rice and other cereal grains and their flours (EFSA 2009; WHO 2011a; WHO 2011b). However fruits and vegetables have also been found to contain levels of inorganic arsenic in the range of parts per billion (FSA 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Unep/Med Wg.474/3 United
    UNITED NATIONS UNEP/MED WG.474/3 UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN 24 Avril 2019 Original: English Meeting of the Ecosystem Approach of Correspondence Group on Monitoring (CORMON), Biodiversity and Fisheries. Rome, Italy, 12-13 May 2019 Agenda item 3: Guidance on monitoring marine benthic habitats (Common Indicators 1 and 2) Monitoring protocols of the Ecosystem Approach Common Indicators 1 and 2 related to marine benthic habitats For environmental and economy reasons, this document is printed in a limited number and will not be distributed at the meeting. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copies to meetings and not to request additional copies. UNEP/MAP SPA/RAC - Tunis, 2019 Note by the Secretariat The 19th Meeting of the Contracting Parties to the Barcelona Convention (COP 19) agreed on the Integrated Monitoring and Assessment Programme (IMAP) of the Mediterranean Sea and Coast and Related Assessment Criteria which set, in its Decision IG.22/7, a specific list of 27 common indicators (CIs) and Good Environmental Status (GES) targets and principles of an integrated Mediterranean Monitoring and Assessment Programme. During the initial phase of the IMAP implementation (2016-2019), the Contracting parties to the Barcelona Convention updated the existing national monitoring and assessment programmes following the Decision requirements in order to provide all the data needed to assess whether ‘‘Good Environmental Status’’ defined through the Ecosystem Approach process has been achieved or maintained. In line with IMAP, Guidance Factsheets were developed, reviewed and agreed by the Meeting of the Ecosystem Approach Correspondence Group on Monitoring (CORMON) Biodiversity and Fisheries (Madrid, Spain, 28 February-1 March 2017) and the Meeting of the SPA/RAC Focal Points (Alexandria, Egypt, 9-12 May 2017) for the Common Indicators to ensure coherent monitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • Macroepiphytes on Cystoseira Species (Phaeophyceae) on the Coast of Montenegro
    © by PSP Volume 23 – No 1. 2014 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin MACROEPIPHYTES ON CYSTOSEIRA SPECIES (PHAEOPHYCEAE) ON THE COAST OF MONTENEGRO Vesna Mačić1,* and Zorica Svirčev2 1 Institute of Marine Biology, University of Montenegro; Dobrota b.b.; 85330 Kotor, Montenegro 2 Department of Biology and Ecology; University of Novi Sad; Trg D. Obradovica 2; Novi Sad 21000; Serbia ABSTRACT tion stress during low tide [1, 3]. Although an epiphytic life style requires specific adaptations like fast growing to The genus Cystoseira considerably supports epiphytic a small body size, early sexual or asexual reproduction, a assemblages on their thallus, but studies on their epiphytic short life span, it is also the strategy by which different species are rare. From the nine Cystoseira taxa from the organisms can avoid competition for substrate [4]. In the coast of Montenegro, 46 species of epiphytes were col- Mediterranean Sea Cystoseira (Phaeophyceae) species lected. Similarities of epiphytic assemblages on different have a dominant role on rocky substrate of coastal zone host algae were analyzed, as well as correlation between and although there are many information about this algae, epiphytes and complexicity of thallus for host Cysto- studies on their epiphytic species are rare [3, 5-8]. Be- seira species. These are the first data for epiphytes as- cause of all that, the aim of this work was to provide more semblages on Cystoseira species from the Montenegrin details on epiphyte species on Cystoseira algae on the coast and further research is needed for providing better Montenegrin coast (Adriatic Sea) and to provide a better data base for future monitoring and evaluating of envi- data base for future monitoring and evaluation of the ronmental changes on the hard-bottom communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Genetic Origin of Three Fucus Morphotypes Using Microsatellite Analysis
    Investigating the genetic origin of three Fucus morphotypes using microsatellite analysis Frida Catharina Skovereng Knoop Master of Marine Biology, June 2021 Supervisors: Inga Kjersti Sjøtun, Pedro Miguel de Azevedo Ribeiro, Geir Dahle Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen 1 Acknowledgements First, I would like to say thank you Kjersti, for shaping the thesis and for giving me the opportunity to participate in this project. Without exception, you have been so kind and supportive throughout the whole process. Although I only got to explore a small part of the vast world of algae, it surely has been an inspirational and interesting journey full of new learnings. Thank you for your guidance and patience in the field, the lab, and for always answering my questions. I could not ask for a better supervisor, and it has been a pleasure to work with you. Pedro, thank you for being an excellent co-supervisor. During this thesis, I very much appreciated your positive attitude and patience. Thank you for taking your time to explain the processes behind the molecular work and for guiding me through the statistical part, which I found particularly challenging. During stressful times, your support kept me calm and made sure I did not lose focus. Also, your feedback was very much appreciated. A special thank you to co-supervisor Geir Dahle at the Institute of Marine Science (IMR) for taking your time to help with the genetic analysis, the ABI Machine, and allele scoring, which was only possible at IMR. I also want to thank you for sharing your knowledge regarding microsatellite analysis, being helpful with the statistics, and providing good feedback.
    [Show full text]