Isinglass River Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Isinglass River Management Plan ISINGLASS RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared for the Isinglass River Local Advisory Committee by the Strafford Regional Planning Commission June 30, 2008 Revision 1 – March 2018 ISINGLASS RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN REVISION HISTORY Revision No. Date Revision Made By: 0 - original issuance June 2008 Strafford Regional Planning Commission 1 - revision March 2018 Isinglass River Local Advisory Committee Reviewed by Tracie Sale, Rivers and Lakes Programs Manager, NH Rivers & Lakes Management and Protection Programs ISINGLASS RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN Funding Source for Original Plan Development: This project was funded by a grant from the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Isinglass Local Advisory Committee (IRLAC) prepared the River Management Plan with assistance from the Strafford Regional Planning Commission and the NH Department of Environmental Services Rivers Management and Protection Program. The Plan was initially completed in June 2008. Members of the Isinglass River Local Advisory Committee have included: Allison Briggaman Strafford Wayne Donle Strafford Chair - Elizabeth Evans Strafford Maryalice Fischer Strafford Jim McCarty Strafford Bruce Smith Strafford Anne Melvin Barrington Ann Schulz Barrington Pam Skeffington Barrington Ted Walsh Barrington Alan Davis Rochester John Johnstone Rochester Elaine Lauterborn Rochester Jim McGranaghan Rochester Alan Davis Rochester Mike Zarenski Rochester Dean Peschel Dover The Isinglass River Local Advisory Committee recognizes the professional contributions to this plan of Steven Couture, NH Rivers Coordinator 2002 – 2011 (NHDES, Rivers Management and Protection Program), and the stakeholders and partners that provided technical and editorial assistance in development of this document. i ISINGLASS RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN MISSION STATEMENT The Isinglass River, the river corridor and the greater Isinglass watershed have experienced and continue to experience effects of increased development and population growth in the coastal watershed of southeast New Hampshire. Although development immediately adjacent to the river has been minimal, there remain a large number of undeveloped parcels within the river corridor. In addition, development adjacent to the river’s tributaries has resulted in construction of numerous road crossings, and loss of forested lands and open space within the watershed. The Isinglass River Management Plan (the Plan) proposes a management approach focused on protecting and conserving the rivers many resources, protecting riparian and aquatic habitat, advocating for water quality and quantity to sustain aquatic and recreational uses, and balancing the development of land and water uses for recreation with other public needs within the river corridor and watershed. The Isinglass River Local Advisory Committee (IRLAC) advocates for implementation of the Plan and supports integration of its goals and strategies by the corridor communities in their planning initiatives and land use decisions. The mission of the Isinglass River Local Advisory Committee is to carry out its duties and responsibilities established by the New Hampshire River Management and Protection Program (NH RSA Chapter 483) to protect and maintain the resources, values and characteristics of the Isinglass River. ii ISINGLASS RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................................... iv CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 A. Background, History and Accomplishments ................................................................................ 1 B. The River Management Plan ........................................................................................................ 3 CHAPTER II. THE ISINGLASS RIVER DESIGNATION .................................................................. 7 A. Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 7 B. River Corridor and Watershed Characteristics ............................................................................. 9 CHAPTER III. RESOURCE IDENTIFICATION ................................................................................ 11 A. Natural Resources ....................................................................................................................... 11 B. Managed Resources .................................................................................................................... 22 C. Cultural and Historic Resources ................................................................................................. 23 D. Recreational Resources ............................................................................................................... 24 CHAPTER IV. RESOURCE ASSESSMENT ....................................................................................... 29 A. Water Quality and Biological Monitoring .................................................................................. 29 B. Watershed Stream Assessments ................................................................................................. 30 D. Instream Flows ............................................................................................................................ 33 E. Water Quality .............................................................................................................................. 34 CHAPTER V. LAND USE ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................ 35 A. Assessment of Land Use in the River Corridor and Watershed ................................................. 35 B. Local Zoning Districts and Use Regulations .............................................................................. 36 C. State and Local Setback and Buffer Requirements .................................................................... 42 D. Effectiveness of Local Land Use Requirements ......................................................................... 44 CHAPTER VI. PRIORITY MANAGEMENT ISSUES AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN .............. 49 A. Original Plan Priorities ............................................................................................................... 49 B. Current Plan Priorities ................................................................................................................ 50 C. Evaluation of Progress ................................................................................................................ 61 D. Partners ....................................................................................................................................... 61 CHAPTER VII: SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 62 APPENDIX A. Survey Results of 2005 and 2007 .................................................................................. 63 APPENDIX B. Key Person Interview Results 2008 .............................................................................. 67 APPENDIX C. Summary of Discussion from June 2, 2008 Community Meeting ................................ 69 APPENDIX D. Map Set ......................................................................................................................... 71 iii ISINGLASS RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Watershed and Designated Segments Map ...............................................................................8 Figure 2. Geologic Formations of the Isinglass River Watershed ..........................................................11 Figure 3. Estimated Transmissivity of the Stratified Drift Aquifers of the Isinglass River Watershed .13 Figure 4. Designated Prime Wetlands Adjacent to the Isinglass River in Barrington ...........................18 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Location and Length of Designated River Segments ................................................................7 Table 2. River Corridor and Watershed Acreage by Community ...........................................................9 Table 3. Acreage of Stratified Drift Aquifers by Community ..............................................................12 Table 4. Habitat Types as Identified in the NH Wildlife Action Plan [2015] ......................................14 Table 5. Core Focus Area Habitat Types Identified in the NH Wildlife Action Plan [2015] ...............16 Table 6. Forest Cover by Acreage and Type [NLCD, 2011] ................................................................16 Table 7. Wetlands by Type and Acreage in the River Corridor and Watershed ...................................17 Table 8. Wetland Acreage in the River Corridor and Watershed by Community ................................18 Table 9. Miles of Tributary Streams and Rivers in the River Corridor and Watershed .......................19 Table 10. Permanently Protected Lands within the Isinglass River Corridor and Watershed ................22 Table 11. Recreational Areas in the Isinglass River Watershed .............................................................25 Table 12. Public and Privately Owned Access to the
Recommended publications
  • NH Trout Stocking - April 2018
    NH Trout Stocking - April 2018 Town WaterBody 3/26‐3/30 4/02‐4/06 4/9‐4/13 4/16‐4/20 4/23‐4/27 4/30‐5/04 ACWORTH COLD RIVER 111 ALBANY IONA LAKE 1 ALLENSTOWN ARCHERY POND 1 ALLENSTOWN BEAR BROOK 1 ALLENSTOWN CATAMOUNT POND 1 ALSTEAD COLD RIVER 1 ALSTEAD NEWELL POND 1 ALSTEAD WARREN LAKE 1 ALTON BEAVER BROOK 1 ALTON COFFIN BROOK 1 ALTON HURD BROOK 1 ALTON WATSON BROOK 1 ALTON WEST ALTON BROOK 1 AMHERST SOUHEGAN RIVER 11 ANDOVER BLACKWATER RIVER 11 ANDOVER HIGHLAND LAKE 11 ANDOVER HOPKINS POND 11 ANTRIM WILLARD POND 1 AUBURN MASSABESIC LAKE 1 1 1 1 BARNSTEAD SUNCOOK LAKE 1 BARRINGTON ISINGLASS RIVER 1 BARRINGTON STONEHOUSE POND 1 BARTLETT THORNE POND 1 BELMONT POUT POND 1 BELMONT TIOGA RIVER 1 BELMONT WHITCHER BROOK 1 BENNINGTON WHITTEMORE LAKE 11 BENTON OLIVERIAN POND 1 BERLIN ANDROSCOGGIN RIVER 11 BRENTWOOD EXETER RIVER 1 1 BRISTOL DANFORTH BROOK 11 BRISTOL NEWFOUND LAKE 1 BRISTOL NEWFOUND RIVER 11 BRISTOL PEMIGEWASSET RIVER 11 BRISTOL SMITH RIVER 11 BROOKFIELD CHURCHILL BROOK 1 BROOKFIELD PIKE BROOK 1 BROOKLINE NISSITISSIT RIVER 11 CAMBRIDGE ANDROSCOGGIN RIVER 1 CAMPTON BOG POND 1 CAMPTON PERCH POND 11 CANAAN CANAAN STREET LAKE 11 CANAAN INDIAN RIVER 11 NH Trout Stocking - April 2018 Town WaterBody 3/26‐3/30 4/02‐4/06 4/9‐4/13 4/16‐4/20 4/23‐4/27 4/30‐5/04 CANAAN MASCOMA RIVER, UPPER 11 CANDIA TOWER HILL POND 1 CANTERBURY SPEEDWAY POND 1 CARROLL AMMONOOSUC RIVER 1 CARROLL SACO LAKE 1 CENTER HARBOR WINONA LAKE 1 CHATHAM BASIN POND 1 CHATHAM LOWER KIMBALL POND 1 CHESTER EXETER RIVER 1 CHESTERFIELD SPOFFORD LAKE 1 CHICHESTER SANBORN BROOK
    [Show full text]
  • Official List of Public Waters
    Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area).
    [Show full text]
  • TYPICAL ROCKS and MINERALS in ILLINOIS By
    Illustrations Figure Page Massive dolomite in northwestern Illinois Frontispiece 1. Rugged topography in northwestern Illinois 12 2. Glacial till overlying bedrock 14 3. Till accumulating at the margin of a glacier 16 4. Glacial moraine in Illinois 17 5. Typical kame near Elgin 17 6. Bluff of loess in southwestern Illinois 18 7. Loess kindchen 20 8. Example of an unconformity 25 9. Copper nuggets found in Illinois 27 10. Group of calcite crystals 29 11. Group of feldspar crystals 30 12. Group of fluorite crystals 31 13. Group of galena crystals 33 14. Fibrous gypsum 31 15. Limonite 35 16. A sheet of mica 36 17. Pyrite and marcasite 38 18. Group of quartz crystals 39 19. Sphalerite crystals 40 20. A granite boulder near Kankakee, Illinois 42 21. A hand specimen of dolerite 43 22. Peridotite dike 44 23. A view of basalt in place 45 24. A hand specimen of i)()ri)hyry 46 25. A boulder of gneiss 47 26. Ouartzite in place 48 27. Thin-bedded limestone near Essex, Illinois 50 28 Cherty Shakopce dolomite 52 29. Thinly bedded shale in southern Illinois 55 30. Sandstone near Oregon, Illinois 56 31. Conglomerate from southern Illinois 57 32. Bands of white chert in limestone 58 33. Concretions of various types 61 34. Geode broken open to show quartz crystals 62 k^^H L 1 -= 1=^ U.S.A. -^^^H \ ^ r ^ ^1 1 L i ^H E «; -H iiTn 11 i|i|i i|i|i|i i| ;co. 1 u.s A. 2 •l A Gvdl tiu*».ot«u^ Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://archive.org/details/typicalrocksmine03ekbl CQ O ?: -5 ^ a be ^ STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M.
    [Show full text]
  • NP 2013.Docx
    LISTE INTERNATIONALE DES NOMS PROTÉGÉS (également disponible sur notre Site Internet : www.IFHAonline.org) INTERNATIONAL LIST OF PROTECTED NAMES (also available on our Web site : www.IFHAonline.org) Fédération Internationale des Autorités Hippiques de Courses au Galop International Federation of Horseracing Authorities 15/04/13 46 place Abel Gance, 92100 Boulogne, France Tel : + 33 1 49 10 20 15 ; Fax : + 33 1 47 61 93 32 E-mail : [email protected] Internet : www.IFHAonline.org La liste des Noms Protégés comprend les noms : The list of Protected Names includes the names of : F Avant 1996, des chevaux qui ont une renommée F Prior 1996, the horses who are internationally internationale, soit comme principaux renowned, either as main stallions and reproducteurs ou comme champions en courses broodmares or as champions in racing (flat or (en plat et en obstacles), jump) F de 1996 à 2004, des gagnants des neuf grandes F from 1996 to 2004, the winners of the nine épreuves internationales suivantes : following international races : Gran Premio Carlos Pellegrini, Grande Premio Brazil (Amérique du Sud/South America) Japan Cup, Melbourne Cup (Asie/Asia) Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe, King George VI and Queen Elizabeth Stakes, Queen Elizabeth II Stakes (Europe/Europa) Breeders’ Cup Classic, Breeders’ Cup Turf (Amérique du Nord/North America) F à partir de 2005, des gagnants des onze grandes F since 2005, the winners of the eleven famous épreuves internationales suivantes : following international races : Gran Premio Carlos Pellegrini, Grande Premio Brazil (Amérique du Sud/South America) Cox Plate (2005), Melbourne Cup (à partir de 2006 / from 2006 onwards), Dubai World Cup, Hong Kong Cup, Japan Cup (Asie/Asia) Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe, King George VI and Queen Elizabeth Stakes, Irish Champion (Europe/Europa) Breeders’ Cup Classic, Breeders’ Cup Turf (Amérique du Nord/North America) F des principaux reproducteurs, inscrits à la F the main stallions and broodmares, registered demande du Comité International des Stud on request of the International Stud Book Books.
    [Show full text]
  • Lady Eli Retired, to Be Bred to War Front
    WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 17, 2018 LADY ELI RETIRED, TO BE BREEDERS= CUP EYES FUTURE HOST SITES, POSSIBLE NEW RACE by Perry Lefko BRED TO WAR FRONT The Board of the Breeders' Cup World Championships will meet later this month to talk about tracks that could potentially host the event from 2019-22 and also discuss the possibility of adding another race. Fred Hertrich III, voted in as the Breeders' Cup Chairman last September, told the TDN that six tracks have expressed tentative interest in hosting the event after this year's Breeders' Cup World Championships at Churchill Downs, November 2-3. All six have been sent letters of tentative interest. Hertrich said when the Breeders' Cup Ltd. hears back from the tracks, it will send out contracts outlining all the details, dates and demands to be considered and see how many respond. Cont. p5 Lady Eli & Irad Ortiz, Jr. | Sarah K Andrew IN TDN EUROPE TODAY by Bill Finley After considering the possibility of racing their star mare this AN ENDURING DREAM FOR CHEVELEY PARK STUD year, co-owners Jay Hanley and Sol Kumin, partners in the Sheep Emma Berry speaks with Chris Richardson regarding Pond Partners stable, have decided to retire Lady Eli (Divine Cheveley Park Stud’s new stallion acquisition Ulysses (Ire) Park--Sacre Coeur, by Saint Ballado). She will be bred to War (Galileo {Ire}). Click or tap here to go straight to TDN Europe. Front and then sold at the 2018 Keeneland November Breeding Stock sale as part John Sikura=s Hill >n= Dale consignment. Following a seventh-place finish in the GI Breeders= Cup Filly & Mare Turf, Lady Eli was entered in the 2017 Keeneland sale, but had to be withdrawn when coming out of the race with lacerations and a puncture wound, which required rest and treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Scangate Document
    416 THE BADMINTON MAGAZINE The spring season at Randwick opens numerous races from 300 to 500 sovs. early in October, the autumn meeting in value. In such a district where being held towards the end of March or money is so plentiful enormous sums early in April. One potent factor in the go through the totalisator. Queensland big prize money which the A.J.C. is able and South Australian racing is of to give is the absence of any serious little importance ; Tasmania is even rivalry ; for, unlike Flemington, which less; and any owner in those States always has Caulfield to contend with, who has a good horse quickly sends him the A.J.C. has no competitors outside to Victoria or New South Wales. of proprietary clubs, the principal of I do not suppose that any country in which are Rosehill, Warwick Farm, the world is more indebted to St. Simon Moorefield, Rosebery, and Canterbury for its thoroughbred stock than Australia Park. Randwick does not possess the is. Malster, Soult, St. Alwyne, Simmer, natural advantages of Flemington, but Positano, San Francisco, Bobadil, St. the A.J.C. executive is quite the most Ambrose, and Haut Brion are a few I business-like body of men I have ever have in mind, and between them they come across, its main idea being to study have sired the winner of every good race the comfort of its patrons. As Sydney in Australia. With but few exceptions is the finest business city in Australia, all the above horses are the leading so does the Harbour City patronise the stallions in Australia to-day, Malster’s racing, and at Randwick I should record of £38,000 for 1910 being one that imagine the racegoer is better catered is hardly likely ever to be approached for than anywhere else in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Pur-Sang (BEL) Mâle,Alezan 1955 (XX=100.00%
    SCORE (Pur-Sang (BEL) Mâle,Alezan 1955 (XX=100.00% )) HAMPTON PS 1872 BAY RONALD PS 1893 DARK RONALD BLACK DUCHESS PS 1886 PS 1905 PRUNUS THURIO PS 1875 XX=100.00% - OX=0.00% DARKIE PS 1889 INSIGNIA PS 1882 PS 1915 SAINT SIMON (ST SIMON) PS 1881 POMEGRANATE PERSIMMON PS 1893 XX=100.00% - OX=0.00% PERDITA II PS 1881 PS 1901 © www.Webpedigrees.com OLEANDER SPRINGFIELD PS 1873 XX=100.00% - OX=0.00% BRIAR ROOT PS 1885 EGLENTYNE PS 1874 PS 1924 BEND OR PS 1877 GALTEE MORE KENDAL PS 1883 XX=100.00% - OX=0.00% WINDERMERE PS 1870 PS 1894 ORCHIDEE II SPRINGFIELD PS 1873 XX=100.00% - OX=0.00% MORGANETTE PS 1884 LADY MORGAN PS 1865 PS 1910 SAINT SIMON (ST SIMON) PS 1881 ORSEIS SAINT SERF (ST SERF) PS 1887 XX=100.00% - OX=0.00% FERONIA PS 1868 PS 1897 NUVOLARI BEND OR PS 1877 XX=100.00% - OX=0.00% ORSOVA PS 1888 FENELLA PS 1869 PS 1938 TRACHENBERG PS 1879 FELS HANNIBAL PS 1891 XX=100.00% - OX=0.00% ZAMA PS 1885 PS 1903 LALAND SAINT SIMON (ST SIMON) PS 1881 XX=100.00% - OX=0.00% FESTA PS 1893 L'ABESSE DE JOUARRE PS 1886 PS 1917 BEND OR PS 1877 LADYLAND KENDAL PS 1883 XX=100.00% - OX=0.00% WINDERMERE PS 1870 PS 1898 NEREIDE AYRSHIRE PS 1885 XX=100.00% - OX=0.00% GLARE PS 1891 FOOTLIGHT PS 1896 PS 1933 ORME PS 1889 GRAND PARADE ORBY PS 1904 XX=100.00% - OX=0.00% RHODA B PS 1895 PS 1916 NALLA DA GUBBIO(NELLA DA DESMOND PS 1896 XX=100.00% - OX=0.00% GRAND GERALDINE PS 1905 GUBBIO) GRAND MARNIER PS 1900 ROCK SAND PS 1900 PS 1924 TRACERY PS 1909 NERA DI BICCI TOPIARY PS 1901 XX=100.00% - OX=0.00% PS 1918 SPEARMINT PS 1903 XX=100.00% - OX=0.00% CATNIP PS
    [Show full text]
  • Dutch Art Garswood Kyllachy Lethal Force Mayson Medicean Pivotal Twilight Son Letter&People.2017 (2) Layout 2 07/11/2016 09:13 Page Ifc2
    Cover 2017(3)_Cover 07/11/2016 09:11 Page 2 Dutch Art Garswood Kyllachy Lethal Force Mayson Medicean Pivotal Twilight Son Letter&people.2017 (2)_Layout 2 07/11/2016 09:13 Page ifc2 John Marsh Senior Manager Andrew Snell Matthew Sigsworth Head of Nomination Department Stud Manager Bloodstock Manager Dale Clements John Hernon Noel Cullen, Stud Groom Stud Groom Cheveley Park Stud Stud Groom Sandwich Stud Warren Hill & Ashley Heath Studs John Rice Chris Dant Julie Rivers Head Stallion Man Financial Director Accounts Manager Left: The chesnut colt by FRANKEL out of PEERESS sold by Cheveley Park Stud for 1,300,000 guineas at Tattersalls October Yearling Sale Book 1 to M V Magnier, Mayfair Sharon Harper Laura Meade and P&R Doyle Office Manager Office Administrator Front cover: Twilight Son after winning the Gr.1 Diamond Jublilee Stakes at Royal Ascot. Letter&people.2017 (2)_Layout 2 07/11/2016 09:14 Page 1 November, 2016 STALLIONS FOR 2017 Dutch Art 4-5 Dear Breeder Garswood 6-7 With the stud’s homebreds having won more races than in any previous season, 2016 has been a memorable year for David and Patricia Thompson, culminating in the thrilling success of QUEEN’S TRUST in the Grade 1 Breeders’s Cup Filly & Mare Turf at Santa Anita. Kyllachy 8-9 In addition to those successes, our resident stallions have enjoyed another stellar year in so many departments. MEDICEAN has continued to have his winners this season and his son, DUTCH ART, responsible for 102 winners worldwide, has once again caught the imagination, with Dutch Lethal Force 10-11 Connection and Zonderland succeeding at the highest levels.
    [Show full text]
  • New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NHDES)
    Impacts of Proposed Elimination of Lake and River Water Quality Management & Monitoring at New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NHDES) General Fund Staffing Analysis When NHDES was created in 1987, six general-funded positions conducted lake and river water quality management and monitoring. Since then, the legislature created 5 new programs to meet the need for increased water quality monitoring and management, yet general funding staffing has only increased by three full time positions. The N.H. House budget for 2012-2013 would reduce the number of general funded positions in the watershed management bureau from eight to two. Impact of Proposed Budget Reductions If the budget adopted by the N.H. House budget were to become law, effective July 1, 2011 the following 5 water quality management and monitoring programs would cease in addition to other DES program reductions. Volunteer Lake & River Assessment Programs (VLAP RSA 487:31-33 & VRAP RSA 487:38-42) In recent years VLAP and VRAP have supported 215 groups with a total of 1,500 lake, river and stream stations being monitored and over 24,000 individual sample results generated annually. Over 700 volunteers participate in these programs representing over 4,300 hours of volunteer time annually. In 2010 the value of the volunteer time was $86,000. Since 1985, volunteers have contributed over $900,000 in in-kind services. Support for and coordination of volunteer monitors, who rely on DES to supply equipment, training, and reporting, would cease. Over 40% of the surface water quality assessments of lakes and rivers included in the EPA required 2010 303(b) surface water quality report were provided by VRAP and VLAP volunteers.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Assessment Report Application A490 Exemption
    1 October 2008 [17-08] DRAFT ASSESSMENT REPORT APPLICATION A490 EXEMPTION OF ALLERGEN DECLARATION FOR ISINGLASS DEADLINE FOR PUBLIC SUBMISSIONS: 6pm (Canberra time) 12 November 2008 SUBMISSIONS RECEIVED AFTER THIS DEADLINE WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED (See ‘Invitation for Public Submissions’ for details) For Information on matters relating to this Assessment Report or the assessment process generally, please refer to http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/standardsdevelopment/ Executive Summary Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) received an unpaid Application from the Beer, Wine and Spirits Council of New Zealand (BWSCNZ) in 2003 seeking to amend the Table to clause 4 of Standard 1.2.3 – Mandatory Warning and Advisory Statements and Declarations, of the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (the Code). Specifically, the Applicant is seeking an exemption from the requirement to declare isinglass (a processing aid commonly derived from dried swim bladders of certain tropical and subtropical fish) on the label, when present in beer and wine as a result of its use as a clarifying agent. The exemption was initially sought on the basis that isinglass has a long history of use as a fining agent in the production of beer and wine and has not been known to cause adverse reactions in susceptible individuals. The Applicant has now provided evidence that dietary exposure to isinglass through beer and wine consumption is extremely low. Results of oral challenge studies have also been provided indicating that isinglass does not cause an allergic reaction to fish sensitive individuals when consumed at levels substantially higher than the potential exposure levels that may be encountered through the consumption of beer and wine.
    [Show full text]
  • Elsie Venner by Oliver Wendell Holmes
    Elsie Venner by Oliver Wendell Holmes CHAPTER I. THE BRAHMIN CASTE OF NEW ENGLAND. There is nothing in New England corresponding at all to the feudal aristocracies of the Old World. Whether it be owing to the stock from which we were derived, or to the practical working of our institutions, or to the abrogation of the technical "law of honor," which draws a sharp line between the personally responsible class of "gentlemen" and the unnamed multitude of those who are not expected to risk their lives for an abstraction,—whatever be the cause, we have no such aristocracy here as that which grew up out of the military systems of the Middle Ages. What we mean by "aristocracy" is merely the richer part of the community, that live in the tallest houses, drive real carriages, (not "kerridges,") kidglove their hands, and French-bonnet their ladies' heads, give parties where the persons who call them by the above title are not invited, and have a provokingly easy way of dressing, walking, talking, and nodding to people, as if they felt entirely at home, and would not be embarrassed in the least, if they met the Governor, or even the President of the United States, face to face. Some of these great folks are really well-bred, some of them are only purse-proud and assuming,—but they form a class, and are named as above in the common speech. It is in the nature of large fortunes to diminish rapidly, when subdivided and distributed. A million is the unit of wealth, now and here in America.
    [Show full text]
  • To Relicense Five Dams on the Connecticut River
    River Management Society Supporting Professionals Who Study, Protect, and Manage RMS WINTER 2013 VOLUME 26, NO. 4 North America’s Rivers Northeast Chapter Focus Prepare to Launch! ............................... 4 RMS and Public Policy ......................... 5 Restoring a Log Driven Stream, ME ..... 6 Stream Restoration in Massachusetts .. 8 TU Leads Dam Removal in ME .......... 10 Clean-Drain-Dry for Paddlers Video ....11 Paddling the Canoemobile ................. 12 New National Rivers Database........... 13 River Protection in NH ........................ 15 Successful Restoration in NH ............. 16 Restoring the Souhegan in NH ........... 18 River Town Program - A Success! ...... 20 Delaware River Basin - Publication .... 27 RMS Training in Denver 2014 ............ 28 TransCanada’s Wilder Station. 10-22-12. Photo: Norman Sims, AMC Using The Integrated Licensing Process To Relicense Five Dams On The Connecticut River America’s First Designated National Penobscot, Rapid, and Magalloway Rivers more. Sometimes states withheld “401 Blueway & Heritage River in Maine provided millions of dollars for Water Quality Certificates” for political improved fish passage, improved water purposes that dragged on project licenses by Tom Christopher quality, increased base flows and extensive for multiple decades. There is a saying that “opportunity recreational enhancements for whitewater Even so, the best part of the ‘93 only knocks once” and when state and boaters and other river users. relicensing work was the emergence of federal agencies as well as multiple non- For those of us in the relicensing negotiated “settlement agreements” on governmental organizations (NGO’s) were game who worked on the earlier ‘93 the Deerfield, Kennebec and other New notified by the Federal Energy Regulatory projects and continued on in later work, England rivers.
    [Show full text]