Chiropractors, Concussions, and Return to Play: Myth's and Facts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chiropractors, Concussions, and Return to Play: Myth's and Facts Ohio Chapter Chiropractors, Concussions, and Return to Play: Myth’s and Facts Last month the Ohio House of Representatives added language to House Bill 59, the State Operating Budget, to allow chiropractors to clear youth athletes to return to practice or play following a concussion. This amendment was in direct opposition to House Bill 143, which passed the General Assembly with near unanimous last year. It dangerously expands the scope of practice for chiropractors, is in conflict with established standards of care for concussion management, and puts youth athletes at risk. MYTH: Concussion Management is within the chiropractic scope of practice FACT: A review of chapter 4734 of the revised code and applicable administrative rules pertaining to the scope of practice for chiropractors finds no references to concussions and other traumatic brain injuries. In fact, a simple keyword search of terms like ‘brain’, ‘concussion’, ‘neurology’, and ‘neurologic’ returns no results. ORC 4734.01 defines the chiropractic scope of practice as the following: As used in this chapter, the "practice of chiropractic" means utilization of the relationship between the musculo-skeletal structures of the body, the spinal column, and the nervous system in the restoration and maintenance of health, in connection with which patient care is conducted with due regard for first aid, hygienic, nutritional, and rehabilitative procedures and the specific vertebral adjustment and manipulation of the articulations and adjacent tissues of the body.1 It is clear from ORC 4734.01 that chiropractors have never had the authority in their scope of practice to treat concussions and other neurologic injuries. Additionally, the American Chiropractic Association offers the following definition of chiropractic: Chiropractic is a health care profession that focuses on disorders of the musculoskeletal system and the nervous system, and the effects of these disorders on general health. Chiropractic care is used most often to treat neuromusculoskeletal complaints, including but not limited to back pain, neck pain, pain in the joints of the arms or legs, and headaches.2 Chiropractors have never been authorized in the revised code to evaluate and clear athletes who have a concussion. Chiropractors are an important part of the healthcare system, but they must consult with a physician before clearing a youth athlete—it is the medically appropriate course of action. MYTH: Prior to House Bill 143, chiropractors could clear youth athletes to return to play FACT: As referenced above, there is simply no section of the Ohio Revised Code or the Ohio Administrative Code that ever authorized chiropractors to clear athletes to return to the field of play. When organizations like the Ohio High School Athletic Association adopted their own concussion management programs, they required chiropractors to consult or collaborate with a physician since they have the necessary education and expertise to clear an athlete following a concussion. National standards adopted by the American Academy of Neurology and endorsed by the NFL and other leading organizations recommend that the return to play process by managed by health care providers who are both knowledgeable about sports concussion and practicing within the scope of their training and experience.3 Chiropractors simply do not meet this standard. 1 ORC 4734.01 2 http://www.acatoday.org/level1_css.cfm?T1ID=42 3 Evaluation and management of concussion in sports: report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, May 2013 MYTH: Many professional and youth sports leagues allow chiropractors to clear athletes in their own concussion management programs FACT: Youth league and high school sports concussion management programs require non-physician clinicians to consult with a physician before clearing players to return following a concussion. In Ohio, the Ohio High School Athletic Association was the first entity to adopt a concussion management program—for return to play, the OHSAA adopted the following requirement: Once a concussion has been diagnosed …..only an MD, DO or LAT can authorize subsequent return to play, and such authorization shall be in writing to the administration of the school.4 The OHSAA guidelines have been in place for 3 years and no problems have been reported. Allowing chiropractors to clear athletes undermines these programs and contradicts medical standards of care. MYTH: Chiropractors have the necessary education to evaluate and clear concussions FACT: Documentation from the Council on Chiropractic Education shows the core competencies that chiropractors should have—the CCE is designated by the U.S. Department of Education as the accrediting body for any institution offering the doctor of chiropractic degree. CCE offers the following definition for clinical competencies related to chiropractors: The neuromusculoskeletal examination is the foundation of the chiropractic approach toward evaluating the patient. Doctors of chiropractic commonly provide care to patients with complaints or health problems associated with the spine and extremities. The spine and its relationship to nervous system function is also viewed as an important factor in the patient's general health. Because the traditional model of chiropractic care involves spinal adjustment, evaluating the spine and nervous system is a crucial component of the patient examination.5 CCE accreditation standards published earlier this year require chiropractors to be ‘proficient in neuromusculoskeletal evaluation, treatment, and management’ and to ‘communicate effectively with patients, doctors of chiropractic, and other health care professionals, regulatory agencies, third party payers, and others as appropriate’.6 The written examination offered by the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners offers a comprehensive review of chiropractic medicine, with no testing on concussions, brain injuries, and neurology; below is a test summary from the NBCE7: Part I: Includes subject examinations in each of six basic science areas: general anatomy, spinal anatomy, physiology, chemistry, pathology, and microbiology. Each subject examination contains 110 standard multiple-choice questions and is allotted 90 minutes of testing time. Part II: Consists of 110 multiple-choice questions in each of six clinical science areas, including general diagnosis, neuromusculoskeletal diagnosis, diagnostic imaging, principles of chiropractic, chiropractic practice, and associated clinical sciences. Each Part II subject is allotted 90 minutes of testing time, with a 20-minute break between subjects. Part III: Addresses nine clinical areas: case history, physical examination, neuromusculoskeletal examination, diagnostic imaging, clinical laboratory and special studies, diagnosis or clinical impression, chiropractic techniques, supportive interventions, and case management. The Part III Examination consists of two books, with a total of 110 standard multiple-choice questions and 10 case vignettes. In the case of concussion management, it is not only appropriate, but medically necessary for chiropractors to consult a physician before authorizing a youth athlete to return to play. 4 OHSAA: Implementation of NFHS playing rules changes related to concussion and return to play protocol, 2011 5 CCE Standards for Doctor of Chiropractic Programs and Requirements for Institutional Status, January 2007 6 CCE Accreditation Standards, January 2013 Principles, Processes & Requirements for Accreditation 7 https://www.nbce.org/written/overview.html MYTH: Chiropractors suffered an unintended consequence in House Bill 143 by having their ability to treat athletes with concussions limited FACT: Language in House Bill 143 required chiropractors and other non-physician practitioners to work in consultation with a physician, pursuant to the referral of a physician, in collaboration with a physician, or under the supervision of a physician when giving an athlete authorization to return to play.8 As has been demonstrated above, this provision is in absolute agreement with current standards of care and the scope of education and expertise of MD’s, DO’s, chiropractors, athletic trainers, and other licensed healthcare providers. There was no unintended consequence. There is no prohibition against chiropractors being on the sidelines at a sporting event or being the first person on the scene when a player is injured. If a coach, referee, parent, chiropractor, or other healthcare provider notices signs of a concussion the player is removed from the field of play and cannot return. There is no requirement that a physician be present during practice or a game as the youth athlete cannot return for at least 24 hours, and only after being cleared by a physician or other healthcare professional working with a physician. Chiropractors can coordinate care and be the primary point of contact throughout the return to play timeline. As was stated in testimony before the Senate Finance Medicaid Subcommittee, chiropractors can order CT scans and other diagnostic exams. All of this is in agreement with the chiropractic scope of practice and is unchanged as a result of House Bill 143. When it comes time to evaluate a player to see if they are ready to return to the field of play, a chiropractor must consult or work with a physician. This is in the best interest of the athlete and in alignment with national standards of care. MYTH: Not all patients and school districts have access to physicians, so
Recommended publications
  • Chiropractic & Osteopathy
    Chiropractic & Osteopathy BioMed Central Debate Open Access Subluxation: dogma or science? Joseph C Keating Jr*1, Keith H Charlton2, Jaroslaw P Grod3, Stephen M Perle4, David Sikorski5 and James F Winterstein6 Address: 16135 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, AZ, 85012, USA, 2School of Medicine, Mayne Medical School, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia, 3Department of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto ON, M2H 3J1, Canada, 4Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Chiropractic, University of Bridgeport, 225 Myrtle Ave., Bridgeport, CT 06604, USA, 5Department of Chiropractic Procedures, Southern California University of Health Sciences, 16200 E. Amber Valley Drive, Whittier, CA 90604, USA and 6President, National University of Health Sciences, 200 East Roosevelt Road, Lombard, IL 60148, USA Email: Joseph C Keating* - [email protected]; Keith H Charlton - [email protected]; Jaroslaw P Grod - [email protected]; Stephen M Perle - [email protected]; David Sikorski - [email protected]; James F Winterstein - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 10 August 2005 Received: 25 May 2005 Accepted: 10 August 2005 Chiropractic & Osteopathy 2005, 13:17 doi:10.1186/1746-1340-13-17 This article is available from: http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/13/1/17 © 2005 Keating et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Subluxation syndrome is a legitimate, potentially testable, theoretical construct for which there is little experimental evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Chiropractic Spinal Manipulation on Central
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN The efects of chiropractic spinal manipulation on central processing of tonic pain - a pilot study using Received: 10 September 2018 Accepted: 8 April 2019 standardized low-resolution brain Published: xx xx xxxx electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) Muhammad Samran Navid 1,2,3, Dina Lelic1, Imran Khan Niazi 3,4,5, Kelly Holt3, Esben Bolvig Mark1, Asbjørn Mohr Drewes1,2 & Heidi Haavik3 The objectives of the study were to investigate changes in pain perception and neural activity during tonic pain due to altered sensory input from the spine following chiropractic spinal adjustments. Fifteen participants with subclinical pain (recurrent spinal dysfunction such as mild pain, ache or stifness but with no pain on the day of the experiment) participated in this randomized cross-over study involving a chiropractic spinal adjustment and a sham session, separated by 4.0 ± 4.2 days. Before and after each intervention, 61-channel electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded at rest and during 80 seconds of tonic pain evoked by the cold-pressor test (left hand immersed in 2 °C water). Participants rated the pain and unpleasantness to the cold-pressor test on two separate numerical rating scales. To study brain sources, sLORETA was performed on four EEG frequency bands: delta (1–4 Hz), theta (4–8 Hz), alpha (8–12 Hz) and beta (12–32 Hz). The pain scores decreased by 9% after the sham intervention (p < 0.05), whereas the unpleasantness scores decreased by 7% after both interventions (p < 0.05). sLORETA showed decreased brain activity following tonic pain in all frequency bands after the sham intervention, whereas no change in activity was seen after the chiropractic spinal adjustment session.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Chiropractic
    THE EVOLUTION OF CHIROPRACTIC ITS DISCOVERY AND DEVELOPMENT BY A. AUG. DYE, D.C. (P.S.C., 1912) COPYRIGHTED 1939 Published by A. AUG. DYE, D.C. 1421 ARCH STREET PHILADELPHIA, PENNA. Printed in U. S. A. C O N T E N T S Chapter Title Page 1 Introduction—Discoverer of Chiropractic............................ 9 2 The Discovery of Chiropractic............................................. 31 3 “With Malice Aforethought” ............................................... 47 4 Early Development; Early School........................................ 61 5 Early Controversies; The Universal Chiropractors’ Asso- ciation; Morris and Hartwell; The Chiropractic Health Bureau; Lay Organization ................................................ 81 6 Medicine vs. Chiropractic.................................................... 103 7 The Straight vs. the Mixer ................................................... 113 8 The Straight vs. the Mixer ................................................... 127 9 The Straight vs. the Mixer; the Final Outcome .................... 145 10 The Chiropractic Adjustment; Its Development ................... 157 11 Chiropractic Office Equipment; Its Development ................ 175 12 The Spinograph; Its Development........................................ 189 13 Chiropractic Spinal Analyses; Nerve, Tracing; Retracing; the Neurocalometer .......................................................... 203 14 The Educational Development of Chiropractic; Basic Science Acts....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bagnaro N. Improvement in Subjective, Academic and TOVA Measures in a Child with ADHD Following Upper
    CASE STUDY Improvement in Subjective, Academic and TOVA Measures in a Child with ADHD Following Upper Cervical Chiropractic Management Nick Bagnaro D.C.1 ABSTRACT Purpose of study: The case study is to report the improvement of an 11 year old boy with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and neck pain utilizing the NUCCA Upper Cervical Chiropractic Technique, neurological exercises and nutritional support. Clinical Features: An 11 year old male presented with primary health concerns of ADHD with noted difficulties in concentration, completion of schoolwork, preparation for tests and reading comprehension. The patient also presented with daily neck pain for 3 years since having his head physically twisted by a teacher attempting to get him to pay attention in class. Intervention and Outcomes: The patient was treated for 3 months with the NUCCA upper cervical technique being monitored with 2 office visits per week for 3 months. Daily nutritional supplementation, dietary changes and chiropractic neurological exercises 6 days per week were also utilized. ADHD symptoms reduced, Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) and academic performance improved. Conclusion: In this case study NUCCA chiropractic care, dietary changes, and neurological exercises improved the parameters of attention and quality of life for this child suffering with ADHD. Key Words: ADHD, NUCCA , upper cervical chiropractic, vertebral subluxation, TOVA, nutritional supplementation, chiropractic neurology Introduction Attention deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD) is a condition alarm that the medical community maybe over diagnosing and known to cause bouts of inattention, hyperactivity, thereby over medicating children.2 impulsivity, poor academic performance and disruptive social behavior. It is has been shown to effect 5% of children and Although medication has been shown to help in the 1 4% of adults.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chiropractic Adjuster (1921)
    THE CHIROPRACTIC ADJUSTER A Compilation of the Writings of D. D. PALMER by his son B. J. PALMER. D. C., Ph. C. President THE PALMER SCHOOL OF CHIROPRACTIC Davenport, Iowa, U. S. A. The Palmer School of Chiropractic Publishers Davenport, Iowa Copyright, 1921 B. J. PALMER, D. C., Ph. C. Davenport, Iowa, U. S. A. PREFACE My father was a prolific writer. He wrote much on many subjects. Some were directly apropos to chiropractic, many of them were foreign to it. He was very versatile in thinking, writing and speaking. He was a broad reader and a radical thinker. Away back in the years past, when I was but a boy, I recall going to his waste-basket each night, picking out the many sheets of long-hand, hand-written copies of his writings. I saved them. I saved them through the years, as much as I could. The compilation of these constituted my first step towards a scrapbook. Although chiropractic was not so named until 1895, yet the naming of “chiropractic” was much like the naming of a baby; it was nine months old before it was named. Chiropractic, in the beginning of the thoughts upon which it was named, dates back at least five years previous to 1895. During those five years, as I review many of these writings, I find they talk about various phases of that which now constitutes some of the phases of our present day philosophy, showing that my father was thinking along and towards those lines which eventually, suddenly crystallized in the accidental case of Harvey Lillard, after which it sprung suddenly into fire and produced the white hot blaze.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiropractic Scope of Practice Sunrise Review
    Information Summary and Recommendations Chiropractic Scope of Practice Sunrise Review December 2013 Publication Number 631-046 For more information or additional copies of this report contact: Health Systems Quality Assurance Office of the Assistant Secretary PO Box 47850 Olympia, WA 98504-7850 360-236-4612 John Wiesman, DrPH, MPH Secretary of Health This page left intentionally blank. Page Contents 1 The Sunrise Review Process 3 Executive Summary 7 Summary of Information 19 Review of Proposal Using Sunrise Criteria 21 Detailed Recommendations 23 Summary of Rebuttals to Draft Recommendations Appendix A: Applicant Report Appendix B: Proposed Bill Appendix C: Applicant Follow-Up Appendix D: Public Hearing Transcript and Participant List Appendix E: Written Comments Appendix F: Pre-participation Physical Evaluation Form Recommended by the Washington Interscholastic Activities Association (WIAA) Appendix G: Medical Examination Report for Commercial Driver Fitness Determination Appendix H: Rebuttals to Draft Recommendations This page left intentionally blank. THE SUNRISE REVIEW PROCESS A sunrise review is an evaluation of a proposal to change the laws regulating health professions in Washington. The Washington State Legislature’s intent, as stated in chapter 18.120 RCW, is to permit all qualified people to provide health services unless there is an overwhelming need for the state to protect the interests of the public by restricting entry into the profession. Changes to the scope of practice should benefit the public. The Sunrise Act (RCW 18.120.010) says a health care profession should be regulated or scope of practice expanded only when: Unregulated practice can clearly harm or endanger the health, safety or welfare of the public, and the potential for the harm is easily recognizable and not remote or dependent upon tenuous argument; The public needs and can reasonably be expected to benefit from an assurance of initial and continuing professional ability; and The public cannot be effectively protected by other means in a more cost-beneficial manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiropractic History: a Primer
    PracticeMakers_504474 3/21/05 3:35 AM Page 1 Chiropractic History: a Primer Joseph C. Keating, Jr., Ph.D. Secretary & Historian, National Institute of Chiropractic Research Director, Association for the History of Chiropractic Carl S. Cleveland III, D.C. President, Cleveland Chiropractic Colleges Director, Association for the History of Chiropractic Michael Menke, M.A., D.C. Faculty Member, National University of Health Sciences Faculty Member, University of Arizona 1 PracticeMakers_504474 3/21/05 3:35 AM Page 2 The NCMIC Insurance Company is proud to make this primer of chiropractic history possible through a grant to the Association for the History of Chiropractic. NCMIC recognizes the importance of preserving the rich history of our profession. This primer will hopefully stimulate your interest in this saga, help you to understand the trials and tribula- tions our pioneers endured, and give you a sense of pride and identity. Lee Iacocca, in his book about LIBERTY said: I know that liberty brings with it some obligations. I know we have it today because others fought for it, nourished it, protected it, and then passed it on to us. That is a debt we owe. We owe it to our parents, if they are alive, and to their memory if they are not. But mostly we have an obligation to our own kids. An obligation to pass on this incredible gift to them. This is how civilization works... whatever debt you owe to those who came before you, you pay to those who follow. That is essentially the same responsibility each of us has to preserve and protect the extraordinary history of this great profession.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mechanism of the Chiropractic Spinal Adjustment/Manipulation: Chiropractic Vs
    3/7/2018 The Mechanism of the Chiropractic Spinal Adjustment/Manipulation: Chiropractic vs. Physical Therapy for Spine Part 5 of a 5 Part Series - US C… Monday, 11 December 2017 22:38 The Mechanism of the Chiropractic Spinal Adjustment/Manipulation: Chiropractic vs. Physical Therapy for Spine Part 5 of a 5 Part Series Written by admin The Mechanism of the Chiropractic Spinal Adjustment/Manipulation: Chiropractic vs. Physical Therapy for Spine Part 5 of a 5 Part Series By: Mark Studin William J. Owens Reference: Studin M., Owens W., (2017) The Mechanism of the Chiropractic Spinal Adjustment/Manipulation: Chiropractic vs. Physical Therapy for Spine, Part 5 of 5, American Chiropractor 39 (12) pgs. 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 31 A report on the scientific literature According to the Cleveland Clinic (2017): The Cleveland Clinic Spine Care Path is a process-based tool designed for integration in the electronic medical record (EMR) to guide clinical work flow and help providers make evidence-based guidelines operational. The care path was developed by Cleveland Clinic’s Center for Spine Health with input from Department of Pain Management staff like Dr. Berenger. One goal was to match appropriate treatments and providers to patients at various points along the care continuum for low back pain. “We know acute back pain is common and often resolves with simple therapy or even no therapy,” Dr. Berenger says. “For patients without red flags, imaging is rarely required.” These patients may be best served through prompt access to care from physical therapists or nurse practitioners as entry-level providers.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix J Glossary of Terms Or References
    Appendix J Glossary of Terms or References ACA APA American Chiropractic Association American Psychological Association activator technique applied kinesiology A system of adjustment using a hand held, manu­ The dynamics of smooth and striated muscle and ally assisted, spring activated device which deliv­ the impact of these tissues on body structure, ers a controlled thrust. healing processes, and disease processes. In particular, applied kinesiology focuses on the acupressure/Meridian therapy identification and correction of proprioceptive The practice of applying digital pressure to stimu­ dysfunction of ligaments and of the muscle spindle late certain sites on the skin to affect distant cells and golgi tendons. In addition, applied functional mechanisms of the body. This therapy kinesiology is concerned with the vascular, lym­ is based on the belief that these sites are organized phatic, and othersystems supportingpropermuscle along meridians which carry the life force that dynamics. innervates the body. arterial aneurysm acupuncture An enlargement of one aspect of an artery caused The practice of insertion of needles into specific by weakness in the arterial wall. exterior body locations to relieve pain, to induce surgical anesthesia, and for therapeutic purposes. aseptic necrosis A condition which is not a specific disease entity adjustment but caused by disruption in normal circulation to A forceful thrust which is meticulously con­ the involved bone. It can result in pain, loss of trolled as to its direction, amount of force em­ bone density, bone collapse or fracture. Some ployed, and the quickness with which it is ap­ possible areas of involvement include the hip, plied. shoulder, elbow, wrist, knee, or heel.
    [Show full text]
  • Manipulative Therapy – Commercial Medical Policy
    UnitedHealthcare® Commercial Medical Policy Manipulative Therapy Policy Number: 2021T0541N Effective Date: July 1, 2021 Instructions for Use Table of Contents Page Related Commercial Policies Coverage Rationale ........................................................................... 1 • Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain and Definitions ........................................................................................... 2 Muscle Rehabilitation Applicable Codes .............................................................................. 2 • Home Traction Therapy Description of Services ..................................................................... 2 • Manipulation Under Anesthesia Clinical Evidence ............................................................................... 3 • Motorized Spinal Traction U.S. Food and Drug Administration ..............................................17 • References .......................................................................................17 Neuropsychological Testing Under the Medical Policy History/Revision Information..............................................23 Benefit Instructions for Use .........................................................................23 • Spinal Ultrasonography • Temporomandibular Joint Disorders Community Plan Policy • Manipulative Therapy Medicare Advantage Coverage Summary • Chiropractic Services Coverage Rationale Manipulative therapy is proven and medically necessary for treating Musculoskeletal Disorders, except as
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanism of Action of Spinal Manipulative Therapy
    Joint Bone Spine 70 (2003) 336–341 www.elsevier.com/locate/bonsoi Review Mechanism of action of spinal manipulative therapy Jean-Yves Maigne a,*, Philippe Vautravers b a Physical Medicine Department, Hôtel-Dieu Teaching Hospital, Place du Parvis de Notre-Dame, 75004 Paris, France b Physical Medicine Department, Hautepierre Teaching Hospital, Strasbourg, France Received 9 April 2002; accepted 15 November 2002 Abstract Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) acts on the various components of the vertebral motion segment. SMT distracts the facet joints, with faster separation when a cracking sound is heard. Intradiscal pressure may decrease briefly. Forceful stretching of the paraspinal muscles occurs, which induces relaxation via mechanisms that remain to be fully elucidated. Finally, SMT probably has an inherent analgesic effect independent from effects on the spinal lesion. These changes induced by SMT are beneficial in the treatment of spinal pain but short-lived. To explain a long-term therapeutic effect, one must postulate a reflex mechanism, for instance the disruption of a pain–spasm–pain cycle or improvement of a specific manipulation-sensitive lesion, whose existence has not been established to date. © 2003 Éditions scientifiques et médicales Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved. Keywords: Spinal manipulative therapy; Low back pain; Manual medicine; Chiropractics; Osteopathy 1. Introduction vertebral motion segment. The conclusions call into question a number of widely held beliefs about SMT. Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) has been proved ef- fective in alleviating acute low back pain and may help to improve neck pain, sciatica, and chronic low back pain [1,2]. 2. Effects on the vertebral motion segment The definition of SMT is not agreed on and varies across specialties (osteopathy, chiropractic, and medicine).
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of 4 Weeks of Chiropractic Spinal Adjustments on Motor Function in People with Stroke: a Randomized Controlled Trial
    brain sciences Article The Effects of 4 Weeks of Chiropractic Spinal Adjustments on Motor Function in People with Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial Kelly Holt 1 , Imran Khan Niazi 1,2,3,* , Imran Amjad 1,4 , Nitika Kumari 1,2 , Usman Rashid 2 , Jens Duehr 1, Muhammad Samran Navid 1,3 , Muhammad Shafique 4 and Heidi Haavik 1 1 Centre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland 1060, New Zealand; [email protected] (K.H.); [email protected] (I.A.); [email protected] (N.K.); [email protected] (J.D.); [email protected] (M.S.N.); [email protected] (H.H.) 2 Faculty of Health & Environmental Sciences, Health & Rehabilitation Research Institute, AUT University, Auckland 0627, New Zealand; [email protected] 3 Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark 4 Faculty of Rehabilitation and Allied Health Sciences and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Riphah International University, Islamabad 46000, Pakistan; muhammad.shafi[email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Chiropractic spinal adjustments have been shown to result in short-term increases in muscle strength in chronic stroke patients, however, the effect of longer-term chiropractic spinal adjustments on people with chronic stroke is unknown. This exploratory study assessed whether 4 weeks of chiropractic spinal adjustments, combined with physical therapy (chiro + PT), had a greater impact than sham chiropractic with physical therapy (sham + PT) did on motor function (Fugl Citation: Holt, K.; Niazi, I.K.; Amjad, Meyer Assessment, FMA) in 63 subacute or chronic stroke patients.
    [Show full text]