DOCSLIB.ORG

2021 Agriculture Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

RULES and REGULATIONS The South Carolina State Fair General Rules and Regulations shall apply. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS 2021 Exhibitor must be a resident of South Carolina and entries must have been grown by the exhibitor in South Carolina. ENTRY REGISTRATION AGRICULTURE 1. Registration is required during the Entry Registration Periods. 2. ShoWorks Online entry system is the preferred method of registration. 3. Download Entry Form You may prefer to register using a current year South Carolina State Fair Official Agriculture Entry form. Mail completed entry form to the SC State Fair Entry Office, PO Box 393, EXHIBIT Columbia SC 29202 or also hand deliver a completed official entry form Monday - Friday during regular office hours between 7:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to Dowling Administration Building, 1200 Rosewood Drive, Columbia SC 29201. Mailed entry forms received after closing date will not be accepted. GUIDE 4. Late Entry registration must be accompanied by the $25 Late Fee. 5. Incomplete entry forms will not be processed. AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT Ellison Building ENTRY REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION 1. Online entry registrations are automatically confirmed by return email at SUPERINTENDENT time of submission. Frances Koon 2. Please print and bring your confirmation on Delivery Day. (c) 803.463.8872 3. Exhibitors who postal mail their entry registration and desire a [email protected] confirmation must include a self-addressed and stamped business size envelope with their entry form. 2021 IMPORTANT DATES 4. Please do not telephone the Fair or Entry Office. • Open Entry Registration: July 1 - Sept. 1 (entry registration forms must be received by this date to avoid Late Fee) LATE ENTRY REGISTRATIONS • Late Entry Registration: Sept 2 - Sept 18 ($25 Late Fee imposed) 1. Entry registration forms received during Late Registration Period must • NEW IN 2021 - Entry Tags will not be mailed as they will be be accompanied by the $25 Late Fee. provided at time of delivery of exhibit(s) to the fair. 2. Late Fees may be charged to a credit/debit card (MasterCard or Visa) • Delivery Days – Enter Gate 11 on Bluff Road or money order. ➢ Sunday, Oct. 10 – 12:00 pm to 5:00 pm 3. Checks will not be accepted during the Late Entry Registration Period. ➢ Monday, Oct. 11 – 8:00 am to 6:00 pm 4. Absolutely no entries will be accepted following the close of the Entry PLEASE NOTE: Exhibits must be delivered in person. Mailed or Registration Period. shipped exhibits will not be accepted. • Scarecrow Contest – Saturday, Oct 16 - 2:00 pm LIMITATIONS • Release of Exhibits – Monday, Oct 25 - 8:00 am to 6:00 pm 1. Exhibitor may register one (1) entry per class, with exception of Honey and Wine Divisions where multiple entries (from different FEES years/vintage years) may be placed in one class by same exhibitor. • No Entry Fee during Open Entry Registration Period 2. All entries not in accordance with the schedule will be disqualified. • Late Registration Fee: $25 ENTRY TAGS (NEW IN 2021) TOTAL PREMIUMS OFFERED 1. Entry tags will not be mailed. Entry tags will be provided at time of $13,348 (This figure does not include value of other awards, i.e. ribbons and delivery of exhibit(s) to the fair. rosettes). DELIVERY OF EXHIBITS TO FAIR PREMIUM CHECKS Agriculture exhibits will be received in the Ellison Building only during the 1. Exhibitors awarded over $599.00 must produce a valid, signed W-9 to dates and times listed under the Important Dates schedule. be awarded premium (prize) monies. 2. Premiums will be paid by check within thirty (30) days after the close of JUDGING the Fair. 1. Judging will take place on the Tuesday prior to Opening Day of Fair 3. Premium checks not cashed in ninety (90) days of issue date become and is closed to the public. void and will not be reissued. 2. Exhibitors are encouraged to visit the fair on Opening Day (admission 4. Lost or stolen premium checks will not be reissued past sixty (60) days $1.00 for everyone) of the fair or refer to the Judging Results web page. of original issue date. Please allow a few days following judging for the results to be posted. 5. No claim that a premium(s) has not been paid, or that there was a 3. Results will not be released by telephone or email. discrepancy in payment of the premium(s) won, will be considered when claim is made later than November 30 following the Fair. RESTRICTIONS Spanish moss, nor any other highly flammable substance, is NOT allowed in any building on the fairgrounds. 1 CARE OF EXHIBITS DURING FAIR 1. The Agriculture Superintendent reserves the right to maintain all DIVISIONS exhibits in show condition. 2. If an exhibit deteriorates to where it detracts from the entire exhibit, it Christmas Trees will be removed from the exhibition area. Field Crops RELEASE OF EXHIBITS Corn 1. The Fair will not be responsible for exhibits or ribbons left past this time Cotton (See above…Very Important Dates). Tobacco 2. Unclaimed exhibits become the property of the SC State Fair and will Small Grain, one (1) peck be disposed of or donated to charity. Peanuts, one (1) peck Soybeans, one (1) peck Other Farm Seeds, one (1) peck Fruit & Nuts Apples Pears Other Fruit Pecans, one (1) peck Other Nuts, one (1) peck Honey Light Honey Dark Honey Best Beekeeper Exhibit SCARECROW CONTEST Vegetables Saturday, Oct 16 at 2:00 pm Sweet Potatoes Home Garden Exhibit Online Registration Required Jul 1 – Sept 1 Cucumbers, any variety, in 1/2 Bushel Basket w/Handle Other Vegetables in 1/2 Bushel Basket w/Handle Scarecrows serve the purpose of scaring away crows and other Tray, Bunch, or Individual Specimens animals that might destroy farm crops. Some scarecrows are truly scary but some scarecrows are funny. We need a few scarecrows to protect the fruits and veggies in the Ellison Building during the South Wine Carolina State Fair in October. We are encouraging family teams of 2-5 Red Grape - Dry (less than 1.0% residual sugar) persons to come build a scarecrow on the Fair Family Farm. Red Grape, Semi-Dry (between 1.0%-3.0% residual sugars) White Grape - Dry (less than 1.0% residual sugar) The first 5 teams to register online beginning Aug 1 – Sept 1 will be White Grape - Semi-Dry (between 1.0%-3.0% residual sugars) eligible to build a scarecrow for Farmer Frances’ garden. The teams will Fruit - Sweet (more than 3.0% residual sugars) be contacted in mid-September. The fair will supply a bale of hay, a Dessert - Sweet (more than 6.0% residual sugars) shirt and a pair of pants for each team. Teams may bring other items, such as hat, scarf, tie, etc. to use in accessorizing their scarecrow. The Scarecrow Contest (Online Registration Only (Jul 1 – Sept 1) five teams will be given one hour to construct their scarecrow and the Agriculture staff will vote on the winner. Division: SC - 528 - Special Contest Class 2801: Scarecrow Contest Premiums: 1st - $30, 2nd - $25, 3rd - $20, 4th - $15, 5th - $10 Awards: A Rosette will be awarded to each team. Come join the fun and cheer on your favorite family team and scarecrow. 2 CHRISTMAS TREES DIVISION DIVISION 0505 – FIELD CROPS – SMALL GRAINS, (1) PECK Premiums DIVISION 0551 – CHRISTMAS TREES 1st – $20, 2nd – $15, 3rd – $12, 4th - $8 SWEEPSTAKES Classes Premium - $100 501. Barley, any variety Best of Show 502. Oats, any variety 503. Rye, any variety Premiums 504. Wheat, any variety 1st – $75, 2nd – $60, 3rd – $50, 4th - $40 505. Grain Sorghum Classes 101. Cedar, Red DIVISION 0506 – FIELD CROPS – PEANUTS, (1) PECK 102. Cypress, Leyland Premiums 103. Pine, Virginia 1st – $20, 2nd – $15, 3rd – $12, 4th - $8 104. Pine, White Classes 105. Any Other 601 - Runner Type 602 - Spanish Type 603 - Virginia Bunch FIELD CROPS DIVISIONS 604 - Any Other Variety Corn Cotton DIVISION 0507 – FIELD CROPS – SOYBEANS, (1) PECK Tobacco Premiums Small Grain, one (1) peck 1st – $20, 2nd – $15, 3rd – $12, 4th - $8 Peanuts, one (1) peck Classes Soybeans, one (1) peck 701 - Delta Pine 105 Other Farm Seeds, one (1) peck 702 - Delta Pine 417 703 - Hagood DIVISION 0502 – FIELD CROPS – CORN 704 - Hartz 7126 Sweepstakes $50 705 - Hutchenson Best of Show - Ten (10) Ear Exhibit 706 - Kirby 707 - LeFlore Premiums 708 - Maxcy 1st – $20, 2nd – $15, 3rd – $12, 4th - $8 709 - NK 583-30 Classes 710 - NK Coker 6738 201. Any White, ten (10) ears 711 - NK Coker 6847 202. Any Yellow, ten (10) ears 712 - Pioneer 9691 203. Any White, five (5) ears 713 - Any other variety 204. Any Yellow, five (5) ears 205. Any White, single (1) ear 0IVISION 508 – FIELD CROPS – OTHER FARM SEEDS, (1) PECK 206. Any Yellow, single (1) ear Premiums 1st – $20, 2nd – $15, 3rd – $12, 4th - $8 CORN JUDGING CRITERIA – 100 POINTS Classes 1. Type and Purity - 40 Points total 801 - Annual Lespedeza • Purity of type (25) 802 - Cotton Seed, fuzzy • Shape of ear and kernel (5) 803 - Cotton Seed, de-linted • Color of kernel and cob (5) 804 - Cowpeas, field • Uniformity of ear and kernel (5) 805 - Cowpeas, table 2. Quality - 40 Points total 806 - Fescue • Maturity (10) 807 - Sericea • Soundness (10) 808 - Sorghum • Freedom from disease damage (5) • Freedom from insect damage (5) SMALL GRAINS JUDGING CRITERIA For small grains, peanuts, soybeans, etc. • Tips and butts (10) Special Notice: Seed samples treated w/oil, wax or other additives will be 3. Shelling Percentage - 20 Points total disqualified. • Type and Purity DIVISION 0503 – FIELD CROPS – COTTON • Color Premiums • Uniformity st nd rd th 1 – $25, 2 – $20, 3 – $15, 4 - $10 • Standard weight Class • Quality 301.
Recommended publications
  • Powdery Mildew of Grapes

    Powdery Mildew of Grapes

    report on RPD No. 773 PLANT December 2019 DEPARTMENT OF CROP SCIENCES DISEASE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN POWDERY MILDEW OF GRAPE Powdery mildew is caused by the fungus Uncinula necator. This fungus was reported in North America in 1834. Powdery mildew occurs in most grape growing areas of the world. If not managed effectively on susceptible cultivars, the disease can reduce vine growth, yield, quality, and winter hardiness. Cultivars of Vitis vinifera and its hybrids (French hybrids) are generally much more susceptible to powdery mildew than are native American cultivars such a Concord. Symptoms Uncinula necator can infect all green tissues of the grapevines. The fungus penetrate only epidermal cells, sending haustoria into them to absorb nutrients. Although haustoria are found only in epidermal cells, neighboring noninvaded cells may become necrotic. The presence of mycelia with conidiophores and conidia on the surface of the host tissue gives it a whitish gray, dusty or powdery appearance. Both surfaces of leaves of any age are susceptible to infection (Figure 1). _____________________________________________________________________________ For further information concerning diseases of small fruits, contact Dr. Mohammad Babadoost, Extension Specialist in Fruit and Vegetable Pathology, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. University of Illinois Extension provides equal opportunities in programs and employment. - 2 - Young expanding leaves that are infected become distorted and stunted (Figure 2). Petioles and cluster stems are susceptible to infection throughout the growing season. Once infected, they become brittle and may break as the season progresses. When green shoots are infected, the affected tissues appear dark brown to black in feathery patches (Figure 3), which later appear reddish brown on the dormant canes.
  • Cold Hardy Grapes

    Cold Hardy Grapes

    Northern NY Agricultural Development Program 2009 Project Report Project Title: Cold Hardy Hybrid Wine Grapes: Cropping, Vigor Management, Wines. Project Leader: Kevin Iungerman, CCE Northeast NY Commercial Fruit Program. Collaborators. Dr. Justine Vanden Heuvel, Dept. of Horticultural Sciences, Grape Program. Dr.Wayne Wilcox, Cornell Department of Plant Pathology. Dr. Tim Martinson, Cornell Statewide Viticulture Extension Program. Dr. Anna Katherine Mansfield and Chris Gerling, Department of Food Science, Enology. Mike Davis, farm manager, Cornell Baker Farm, Willsboro. Steven Lerch, Cornell Grape Program, Geneva. Extension Associations and Fruit Growers of CCE’s NENY Commercial Fruit Program. Lake Champlain Grape Growers Association and Willsboro and NENYF volunteers. Cooperating Producers: County Producer Farm/Vineyard City/Town State Albany Mike DiCrescenzo Altamont Vineyard Altamont NY Clinton Phil Favreau Stone House Vineyard Mooers NY Clinton Mary and Gilles Fortin Amazing Grace Vnyrd. Chazy NY Clinton Erwin Kalmar (New 2009. Unnamed) Champlain Que. Clinton Richard Lamoy Hid-in-Pines Vineyard Morrisonville NY Clinton Rob McDowell Purple Gate Vineyard Plattsburgh NY Clinton N. Peck, C. Read North Star Vineyard Mooers NY Clinton Dan Vesco Vesco Ridge Vnyrd. Essex W. & K. Reinhardt Blue Stone Vineyards Willsboro NY Essex Peter Rowley Edgewater Farm Willsboro NY Essex Todd Trzaskos Vermont Logic (Essex Land) VT Saratoga Mike Spiak Kayaderosseras Vnyrd. Greenfield Cen. NY Washington Gerry Barnhart Victoryview Vineyard Schatigcoke NY Washington Ken Denberg Natural Selection Farm Cambridge NY Washington S. Knapp, D. Wilson Slyboro Ciderhouse Granville NY Orange Ed Lincoln Maple Gate Farm Randolph VT Background: The 300-vine Willsboro Wine Grape Trial was planted in 2005 to comparatively evaluate 25-hybrid cold-hardy-wine-grape-cultivars.
  • 2008 Maréchal Foch Signature

    2008 Maréchal Foch Signature

    2008 MARÉCHAL FOCH SIGNATURE Tasting Notes: We just love making this French-American hybrid grape into wine. Calling this a “Signature” vintage is our way of telling you that it is one of our very finest. This estate wine bursting with flavors of black current, plum & spice, ends with a complex lingering finish. It’s great with roasts in the winter and rich pasta dishes in the summer. Sue recommends pairing it with Sausage and Zucchini Lasagna from allrecipes.com. Winemaking: Maréchal Foch (MAHR-shahl FOHSH) or just Foch, is one of two hybrid grapes we have planted at the estate, Dunn Forest Vineyard. The fruit was gently de- stemmed by a Euro Select into 1.5-ton fermenters leaving a very high whole berry content. A three to four day cold soak proceeded inoculation done with a variety of yeasts designed to increase complexity and mouth-feel. Fermentations were punched down twice a day for ten days with temperatures peaking around 90°F. The wine was racked via gravity directly to barrel. The skins were shoveled into the press and allowed to drain before pressing creating both free run barrels and pressed wine barrels. After 9 months in American oak barrels the wines were racked to tank for blending and bottled in September 2009. Harvest Notes: 2008 started out a little scary with snow in April but ended with a beautiful Indian summer producing well-balanced wines. A cold dry spring seemed to have little effect on bloom, it occurred mid-June and we had beautiful fruit set. Timely August and September rains along with a warm October made for an excellent ripening season.
  • Growing Grapes in Missouri

    Growing Grapes in Missouri

    MS-29 June 2003 GrowingGrowing GrapesGrapes inin MissouriMissouri State Fruit Experiment Station Missouri State University-Mountain Grove Growing Grapes in Missouri Editors: Patrick Byers, et al. State Fruit Experiment Station Missouri State University Department of Fruit Science 9740 Red Spring Road Mountain Grove, Missouri 65711-2999 http://mtngrv.missouristate.edu/ The Authors John D. Avery Patrick L. Byers Susanne F. Howard Martin L. Kaps Laszlo G. Kovacs James F. Moore, Jr. Marilyn B. Odneal Wenping Qiu José L. Saenz Suzanne R. Teghtmeyer Howard G. Townsend Daniel E. Waldstein Manuscript Preparation and Layout Pamela A. Mayer The authors thank Sonny McMurtrey and Katie Gill, Missouri grape growers, for their critical reading of the manuscript. Cover photograph cv. Norton by Patrick Byers. The viticulture advisory program at the Missouri State University, Mid-America Viticulture and Enology Center offers a wide range of services to Missouri grape growers. For further informa- tion or to arrange a consultation, contact the Viticulture Advisor at the Mid-America Viticulture and Enology Center, 9740 Red Spring Road, Mountain Grove, Missouri 65711- 2999; telephone 417.547.7508; or email the Mid-America Viticulture and Enology Center at [email protected]. Information is also available at the website http://www.mvec-usa.org Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction.................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 2 Considerations in Planning a Vineyard ........................................................
  • Training Systems for Cold Climate Hybrid Grapes in Wisconsin

    Training Systems for Cold Climate Hybrid Grapes in Wisconsin

    A4157 Training systems for cold climate hybrid grapes in Wisconsin A. Atucha and M. Wimmer Cold climate hybrid grape cultivars (e.g., ‘Marquette’, ‘Frontenac’, ‘La Crescent’, ‘Brianna’, etc.) differ from European grape (Vitis vinifera) cultivars in several respects and require separate consideration with regard to the most appropriate training system. This publication focuses on aspects to consider when choosing a training system for cold climate hybrid grapes. Introduction Choosing a training system The training of grapevines refers to the physical action of The choice of an adequate training system will be influenced by manipulating a vine into a particular size, shape, and orientation. the following factors. The main objectives of training grapevines are to: 1. Maximize the interception of light by leaves and clusters, Cultivar growth habit Cold climate hybrids have a broad range of growth habits from leading to higher yield, improved fruit quality, and better procumbent (or downwards) to upright, and the choice of training disease control; system should adapt to the growth characteristic of the cultivar. 2. Facilitate pruning, canopy management, harvesting, and Cold climate hybrid cultivars with procumbent growth adapt well mechanization of the vineyard; to training systems that have downward shoot orientation such 3. Arrange trunks, cordon, and canes to avoid shading between as high wire cordon (HWC) (figure 1) or Geneva double curtain vines; and (GDC) (figure 2). 4. Promote light exposure in the renewal zone (i.e., spurs or heads) to maintain vine productivity. FIGURE 1. High wire cordon (HWC) is a downward FIGURE 2. Geneva double curtain (GDC) trained with two spur-pruned training system.
  • Kentucky Viticultural Regions and Suggested Cultivars S

    Kentucky Viticultural Regions and Suggested Cultivars S

    HO-88 Kentucky Viticultural Regions and Suggested Cultivars S. Kaan Kurtural and Patsy E. Wilson, Department of Horticulture, University of Kentucky; Imed E. Dami, Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University rapes grown in Kentucky are sub- usually more harmful to grapevines than Even in established fruit growing areas, ject to environmental stresses that steady cool temperatures. temperatures occasionally reach critical reduceG crop yield and quality, and injure Mesoclimate is the climate of the vine- levels and cause significant damage. The and kill grapevines. Damaging critical yard site affected by its local topography. moderate hardiness of grapes increases winter temperatures, late spring frosts, The topography of a given site, including the likelihood for damage since they are short growing seasons, and extreme the absolute elevation, slope, aspect, and the most cold-sensitive of the temperate summer temperatures all occur with soils, will greatly affect the suitability of fruit crops. regularity in regions of Kentucky. How- a proposed site. Mesoclimate is much Freezing injury, or winterkill, oc- ever, despite the challenging climate, smaller in area than macroclimate. curs as a result of permanent parts of certain species and cultivars of grapes Microclimate is the environment the grapevine being damaged by sub- are grown commercially in Kentucky. within and around the canopy of the freezing temperatures. This is different The aim of this bulletin is to describe the grapevine. It is described by the sunlight from spring freeze damage that kills macroclimatic features affecting grape exposure, air temperature, wind speed, emerged shoots and flower buds. Thus, production that should be evaluated in and wetness of leaves and clusters.
  • 2007 Ohio Wine Competition

    2007 Ohio Wine Competition

    Official Results 2007 OHIO WINE COMPETITION Date: May 14-16, 2007 Location: Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio Competition Coordinator: Todd Steiner, OARDC, Wooster, OH Asst. Comp. Coordinators: Taehyun Ji and Dave Scurlock, OARDC, Wooster, OH Judges Chairman: Todd Steiner, Brian Sugerman OARDC, Wooster, OH Judges: Ken Bement, Owner, Whet Your Whistle Wine Store, Madison, OH Peter Bell, Winemaker, Enologist, Fox Run Vineyards, Penn Yenn, NY Amy Butler, Tasting Room Manager, Butler Winery, Bloomington, IN Nancie Corum, Asst. Winemaker, St. Julian Wine Company, Paw Paw, MI Jim Mihaloew, Certified Wine Educator and AWS Judge, Strongsville, OH Johannes Reinhardt, Winemaker, Anthony Road Winery, Penn Yan, NY Sue-Ann Staff, Head of Winemaking Operations, Pillitteri Estates Winery, Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario, Canada Entries: 265 Awards: Gold: 25 Silver: 69 Bronze: 79 2007 Ohio Wine Competition Summary of Awards by Medal WINERY WINE NAME VINTAGE APPELLATION MEDAL Breitenbach Wine Cellars Apricot NV American G Breitenbach Wine Cellars ThreeBerry Blend NV American G Breitenbach Wine Cellars Blueberry NV American G Debonne Vineyards Riesling 2006 Grand River Valley G Debonne Vineyards Chambourcin 2005 Grand River Valley G Debonne Vineyards Vidal Blanc 2006 Grand River Valley G Ferrante Winery & Ristorante Vidal Blanc 2006 Grand River Valley G Ferrante Winery & Ristorante Pinot Grigio Signature Series 2006 Grand River Valley G Ferrante Winery & Ristorante Riesling Signature Series 2006 Grand River Valley G Firelands Winery Gewurztraminer 2006 Isle St. George G Grand River Cellars Vidal Blanc Ice Wine 2005 Grand River Valley G Hermes Vineyards Semillon 2006 Lake Erie G Klingshirn Winery, Inc. Niagara NV Lake Erie G Klingshirn Winery, Inc.
  • Matching Grape Varieties to Sites Are Hybrid Varieties Right for Oklahoma?

    Matching Grape Varieties to Sites Are Hybrid Varieties Right for Oklahoma?

    Matching Grape Varieties to Sites Are hybrid varieties right for Oklahoma? Bruce Bordelon Purdue University Wine Grape Team 2014 Oklahoma Grape Growers Workshop 2006 survey of grape varieties in Oklahoma: Vinifera 80%. Hybrids 15% American 7% Muscadines 1% Profiles and Challenges…continued… • V. vinifera cultivars are the most widely grown in Oklahoma…; however, observation and research has shown most European cultivars to be highly susceptible to cold damage. • More research needs to be conducted to elicit where European cultivars will do best in Oklahoma. • French-American hybrids are good alternatives due to their better cold tolerance, but have not been embraced by Oklahoma grape growers... Reasons for this bias likely include hybrid cultivars being perceived as lower quality than European cultivars, lack of knowledge of available hybrid cultivars, personal preference, and misinformation. Profiles and Challenges…continued… • The unpredictable continental climate of Oklahoma is one of the foremost obstacles for potential grape growers. • It is essential that appropriate site selection be done prior to planting. • Many locations in Oklahoma are unsuitable for most grapes, including hybrids and American grapes. • Growing grapes in Oklahoma is a risky endeavor and minimization of potential loss by consideration of cultivar and environmental interactions is paramount to ensure long-term success. • There are areas where some European cultivars may succeed. • Many hybrid and American grapes are better suited for most areas of Oklahoma than
  • 2014 Midwest Small Fruit and Grape Spray Guide Contents Foreword

    2014 Midwest Small Fruit and Grape Spray Guide Contents Foreword

    2 014 Midwest Small Fruit and Grape Arkansas Spray Guide University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service AG1281 Illinois University of Illinois Extension ICSG3-14 Indiana Purdue Extension ID-169 Iowa Iowa State University Extension and Outreach PM 1375 Kansas K-State Research and Extension Kentucky University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service ID-94 Missouri University of Missouri Missouri State University MX377 Nebraska University of Nebraska — Lincoln Extension Ohio Ohio State University Extension 506B2 Oklahoma Oklahoma State University Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service E-987 West Virginia West Virginia University Extension Service Publication 865 Wisconsin University of Wisconsin-Extension A3899 2014 Midwest Small Fruit and Grape Spray Guide Contents Foreword .......................................................................................................................................6 Tips on Using This Spray Guide .................................................................................................13 Grape Spray Schedule .................................................................................................................15 Blueberry Spray Schedule ...........................................................................................................37 Raspberry and Blackberry Spray Schedule .................................................................................42 Strawberry Spray Schedule .........................................................................................................49
  • Amateur Wine Show- 40

    Amateur Wine Show- 40

    AMATEUR WINE SHOW- 40 Co-Chairmen - Pat Strickland Premiums: $8.00, $6.00, $4.00 Premiums Offered: - $320.00 RULES 1. Entries must be entered between 2:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. Thursday August 19th, and remain on display until 1:00 p.m. Sunday, August 29th 2. This is an amateur contest. No entrant shall be involved in any way with commercial wine making or use the facilities of commercial wineries, other than obtaining grapes, juice, concentrates, etc. 3. Each entry must be entered in a glass container (preferably bottle with cork) and contain not less that 1/2 pint or more than 1 quart. Attach label with name of wine and date made. 4. "Best of Show" ribbon will be awarded to the wine considered by the judges to be the best wine in the wine competition. First place wines in each category will be eligible for this award. 5. All entries must be completed since fair 2016 6. Decisions of the judges will be final. The American Wine Society guidelines will be used in judging the wines. Judges’ decisions and placings are final. 40-01-01-00 ...........................................................................Red American These wines must be made from native or American hybrid grapes, still, and dry. (Examples: Concord, Ives, Muscadine, Cynthiana, etc.) 40-01-02-00 ........................................................................White American These wines must be made from native or American hybrid grapes, still, and dry. (Examples: Niagara, Duchess, Diamond, Carlos, Magnolia, Margeurite, etc.) 40-01-03-00 ................................................................................Red Hybrid These wines must be dry, be made from grapes crossed from more than one species, usually exhibiting some “vinifera” characteristics, and may exhibit tannin and/or oak character.
  • Utilization of Microsatellite Markers for a Comparative Assessment Of

    Utilization of Microsatellite Markers for a Comparative Assessment Of

    BearWorks MSU Graduate Theses Spring 2016 Utilization Of Microsatellite Markers For A Comparative Assessment Of Norton And Cynthiana, And The Linkage Map Construction Of A 'Chambourcin' X 'Cabernet Sauvignon' Population Mia Elizabeth Mann As with any intellectual project, the content and views expressed in this thesis may be considered objectionable by some readers. However, this student-scholar’s work has been judged to have academic value by the student’s thesis committee members trained in the discipline. The content and views expressed in this thesis are those of the student-scholar and are not endorsed by Missouri State University, its Graduate College, or its employees. Follow this and additional works at: https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses Part of the Plant Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Mann, Mia Elizabeth, "Utilization Of Microsatellite Markers For A Comparative Assessment Of Norton And Cynthiana, And The Linkage Map Construction Of A 'Chambourcin' X 'Cabernet Sauvignon' Population" (2016). MSU Graduate Theses. 2385. https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/2385 This article or document was made available through BearWorks, the institutional repository of Missouri State University. The work contained in it may be protected by copyright and require permission of the copyright holder for reuse or redistribution. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UTILIZATION OF MICROSATELLITE MARKERS FOR A COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF NORTON AND CYNTHIANA, AND THE LINKAGE MAP CONSTRUCTION OF
  • Research Focus 2016-3B

    Research Focus 2016-3B

    Research News from Cornell’s Viticulture and Enology Program Research Focus 2016-3b RESEARCH FOCUS Comparing Red Wine Color in V. vinifera and Hybrid Cultivars Claire Burtch and Anna Katharine Mansfield Department of Food Science, Cornell University, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, NY KEY CONCEPTS • The color of red wine comes from pigments called anthocyanins. • Wines produced from V. vinifera have antho- cyanin-3-monoglucosides, which polymerize with other wine compounds to form stable color. • Wine produced from interspecific hybrids usu- Bench-top anthocyanin kinetic experiments help researchers ally contain high concentrations of anthocyan- describe color formation in red hybrid wines. Photo by Claire Burtch in-3,5-diglucosides. Red hybrid grapes have a broader and more varied col- • Anthocyanin-3,5-diglucosides don't form poly- lection of phenolic compounds than their Vitis vinifera meric pigment as quickly as monoglucosides. counterparts, and consequently show greater diversity in wine color, structure, and mouthfeel. Hybrid red • Hybrid cultivars have less extractable tannins. wine quality, however, is often measured through com- parison to more familiar V. vinifera varietal wines, so • Interspecific hybrid wines will have low con- obvious color differences may detract from perceived centrations of stable color, polymeric pigment, quality. Winemakers complain that hybrid red wines due to high anthocyanin-3,5-diglucoside con- vary from V. vinifera in color density, hue, and develop- centration and low tannin concentration. ment during aging, but the reasons for these differences have not been extensively studied. To determine the nins. For this reason, understanding the rate and types source of the differences in hybrid and V.