DOCSLIB.ORG

1 TULALIP Tribeаннаexhibits Before the Magistrate Date Exhibit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 TULALIP Tribeаннаexhibits Before the Magistrate Date Exhibit TULALIP TRIBE ­­ Exhibits Before the Magistrate Date Exhibit # Description Admitted 1 T­M­1 Booklet ­ 1928 Bylaws of the 12/18/74 Snohomish Tribe T­M­2 Minutes of first meeting of 12/18/74 Snohomish Tribe T­M­3A Letter of 7/9/35 by Harriet 12/18/74 Williams T­M­3B Letter of 8/20/34 by Harriet 12/18/74 Williams T­M­4 Snohomish membership list 12/18/74 T­M­5 State certificate of Snohomish 12/18/74 incorporation 8/8/27 T­M­6 Snohomish 1927 Bylaws 12/18/74 T­M­7 Questionnaire; enrollment 12/18/74 application T­M­8 Senate Report #91­1144 12/18/74 T­M­9 Portion of affidavit by Harriet 1/3/75 Dover T­M­10 FAB­79­57, Report re: Tulalip 11/27/79 Tribes Coho fishery T­M­11 Wash. Dept. of Fisheries 11/27/79 Emergency Orders 79­22, 25, 31, 32, 33, 34, 52, 65, 71, 72, 74, 83, 95, 96, 105, 108, 110, 115 T­M­12 "Identity, Treaty Status and 7/11/83 Fisheries of the Tulalip Not Admitted Tribes," by Barbara Lane, Ph.D., 5/3/94 (89­ 7/18/75 (USA­92?) 3) T­M­13 "Identity, Treaty Status and 7/11/83 Fisheries of the Snoqualmie Not Admitted Tribe of Indians," by Barbara 5/3/94 (89­ Lane, Ph.D. 10/15/75 (USA­104) 3) 2 T­M­14 "Identity, Treaty Status and 7/11/83 Fisheries of the Snohomish Tribe Not Admitted of Indians," by Barbara Lane, 5/3/94 (89­ Ph.D. 10/15/75 (USA 103) 3) T­M­15 Fryberg, Raymond, form letter to 7/11/83 all case area tribal chairmen and fisheries managers re: settlement negotiations T­M­16 Tweddel, Colin Ellidge, A WITHDRAWN Historical and Ethnological Study of the Snohomish Indian People: Report Specifically Covering Their Aboriginal and Continued Existence and Their Effective Occupation of a Definable Territory, August 1953, submitted by claimant in Snohomish Tribe v. United States, 7 Ind. Cl. Comm. 768 (1959), Dkt. #125 T­M­17 Lane, Dr. Barbara, "Duwamish and WITHDRAWN Samish Ancestry of Tulalip Tribal Members as Reflected in Records and Correspondence of the BIA" (undated), plus census rolls T­M­18 Lane, Dr. Barbara, "Further WITHDRAWN Report on Duwamish Ancestry of Tulalip Tribal Members" (undated) plus letter of April 31, 1980, from Dr. Lane to Mason Morisset and Moshe Genauer. T­M­19 Taylor, June. Expert testimony WITHDRAWN submitted by the U. S. in Upper 7/12/83 Skagit Tribe v. United States, 8 Ind. Cl. Comm. 475 (1960) Dkt. #92 T­M­20 Bagley, Clarence. Excerpts from 7/12/83 In the Beginning, Seattle, Not Admitted Lowman & Hanford Stationery & 5/3/94 (89­ Printing Co. (1905) 3) 3 T­M­21 Bagley, Clarence. Excerpt from 7/14/83 "Journal of Occurrences at 5/3/94 (89­ Nisqually House," Wash. Hist. 3) Quarterly, Vol. VI 4 T­M­22 Menzie, Excerpts from Menzie's 7/14/83 Journal (1972) 5/3/94 (89­ 3) T­M­23 Farrar, Victor, "The Nisqually 7/15/83 Journal," Wash. Hist. Quarterly, 5/3/94 (89­ Vol. 10, #1, Wash. Univ. State 3) Historical Society, Seattle, Univ. of Wash. Dept of Printing, April, 1849. T­M­24 Vancouver, Excerpt from Journal REJECTED (1792) 7/14/83 T­M­25 Rice, Chuck, Article from 7/14/83 Snohomish Tribune entitled 5/3/94 (89­ "Hudson's Bay Co. Journal Cited 3) Snohomish Indians" (undated) T­M­26 MacMillan, James, McDonald, 7/14/83 Archibald, Fort Langley Journal, 5/3/94 (89­ Hudson's Bay Co. (6/27/1827 ­ 3) 7/30/1830) T­M­27 Work, John. "Journal," Wash. 7/14/83 Hist. Quarterly Vol. III, #2, 5/3/94 (89­ April 1912, Seattle (1834 ­ 35) 3) T­M­28 Work, John. Excerpt from Journal 7/14/83 (Jan. ­ Oct., 1835), Archives of 5/3/94 (89­ British Columbia Memoir #X, 3) printed by Charles F. Banfield, 1945, Victoria, B.C. T­M­29 Huggins, E., Memoirs of 7/14/83 Nisqually 107 (excerpt) 5/3/94 (89­ 3) T­M­30 Excerpt, Journal of Father 7/14/83 Blanchet (map) 5/3/94 (89­ 3) T­M­31 Handwritten letter to Tulalip 7/14/83 Agency, 10/6/1867 (excerpt), 5/3/94 (89­ Sand Point Federal Archives and 3) Record Center, MR­7, Roll 2. 5 T­M­32 Handwritten letter from Olympia 7/15/83 Indian Agency Agent to 5/3/94 (89­ Superintendent of Indian Affairs 3) (7/1/1860) T­M­33 Chirouse, E. C., Excerpt of 7/15/83 Annual Report to Commissioner 5/3/94 (89­ (9/23/1874) 3) T­M­34 Denny, Arthur. Pioneer Days on 7/15/83 Puget Sound, (excerpt) (Seattle, Not Admitted C. B. Bagley) 1888 5/3/94 (89­ 3) T­M­35 DeMofras, Duflot, Travels on the 7/11/83 Pacific Coast (excerpts) 5/3/94 (89­ (undated) 3) T­M­36 Gibbs, George. "Tribes of 7/14/83 Western Washington and 5/3/94 (89­ Northwestern Oregon" (excerpts), 3) Contributions to North American Ethnology Vol. I, Part II, Dept. of Interior, Washington Government Printing Office (1877) T­M­37 Duff, Wilson. The Upper Stalo NOT ADMITTED Indians of the Fraser Valley, British Columbia, British Columbia Provincial Museum, Dept. of Education Victoria, British Columbia (1952) T­M­38 Suttles, Wayne, Katzie 7/14/83 Ethnographic Notes, British 5/4/94 (89­ Columbia Provincial Museum, 3) Anthropology in British Columbia, Memoirs #2, 3 (1955) T­M­39 Troxel, Kathryn Marie, Fort 7/15/83 Nisqually and the Puget Sound Not Admitted Agricultural Co. (1950) 5/3/94 (89­ (excerpts), doctoral thesis, 3) Dept. of History, Indiana University 6 T­M­40 Ind. Cl. Comm., Dkt #109, REJECTED Duwamish Tribe vs. United 7/12/83 States, Defendants' Request for Findings of Fact, Objections to Findings of Fact Requested by Petitioner, and brief (1976) (excerpts) T­M­41 McDowell, Malcolm, Report on the WITHDRAWN Indians of Western Washington 7/11/83 (excerpts) (1920) T­M­42 Ind. Cl. Comm., Dkt. #109, 7/12/83 Duwamish Tribe vs. United Not Admitted States, Transcript of 5/4/94 (89­ proceedings, Vol. 3, (8/18/1955) 3) (excerpts) 7 T­M­43 Ind. Cl. Comm., Dkt. #s 109, WITHDRAWN 125, 132 Duwamish, Snohomish, 7/11/83 and Suquamish vs. United States, Not Admitted Transcript of proceedings, Vol. 5/4/94 (89­ 4, (1/6/1959) (excerpts) 3) T­M­44 Heath, Joseph, Memoirs of 7/15/83 Nisqually (1979) (excerpts) 5/4/94 (89­ 3) T­M­45 Annual Report of the 7/15/83 Commissioner of Indian Affairs 5/3/94 (89­ for the Year 1850, Transmitted 3) with the Message of the President at the Opening of the Second Session of the 32d Congress (excerpts) T­M­46 Message of the President of the 7/15/83 United States Transmitted to 5/3/94 (89­ Congress at the Commencement of 3) the First Session of the 35th Congress, Vol. I (1858) (excerpts) T­M­47 Stevens, Governor I. I., Report 7/15/83 of Exploration of a Route for 5/3/94 (89­ the Pacific Railroad from St. 3) Paul to Puget Sound (1854) (excerpts) T­M­48 Rugg, Charles B., Letter to the WITHDRAWN Secretary of the Interior re: 7/11/83 Siuattle Indian Tribe vs. United States, Ct. Cl. #L­33 (7/15/1932) T­M­49 Ind. Col. Comm., Dkt #109 7/12/83 Duwamish Tribe vs. United States, Transcript of proceedings (June 9, 10, & 13, 1952) T­M­50 Fort Nisqually Sales Journal 7/18/83 (Puget Sound Agricultural 5/3/94 (89­ Company) ledger page (July, 3) 1948) (excerpts) 8 T­M­51 Ware & Vavaseur, Papers Relative 7/15/83 to the Expedition of Lieut.'s 5/3/94 (89­ Ware and Vavaseur to the Oregon 3) Territory (1846) (excerpts) T­M­52 Haeberlin, Dr. H. K., Notebooks WITHDRAWN on Puget Sound Indian Ethnology, 7/11/83 Vol. 28 (1927) (excerpts) T­M­53 Fort Nisqually Journal, March 7/15/83 10, 1849 ­ August 6, 1850 5/3/94 (89­ (excerpts) 3) T­M­54 Ind. Cl. Comm., Dkt. #125, WITHDRAWN Snohomish Tribe vs. United 7/11/83 States, Transcript of proceedings (Tweddell redirect) (August 10, 11, & 12, 1953)(excerpts) T­M­55 Ind. Cl. Comm., Dkt #125, 7/12/83 Snohomish Tribe vs. United Not Admitted States, transcript of 5/4/94 (89­ proceedings (8/15/1955) 3) (excerpt) T­M­56 Eels, M., "The Indians of Puget WITHDRAWN Sound," The American 7/11/83 Antiquarian, Vol. IX, #1, (1/18/1887) (excerpt) T­M­57 Deposition of William Kanim WITHDRAWN (2/25/1927) (excerpt) 7/11/83 T­M­58 Annual Report of the 7/15/83 Commissioner of Indian Affairs 5/3/94 (89­ for the Year 1854, Transmitted 3) with the Message of the President at the Opening of the 2d Session of the 33rd Congress (excerpts) T­M­59 Ind. Cl. Comm., Dkt. #92, Skagit 7/12/83 Tribe vs. United States, Not Admitted Examination of June Collins 5/4/94 (89­ (Sept. 11, 1958) (excerpts) 3) 9 T­M­60 H. R. Exec. Docs., 34th Cong. 3d 7/15/83 Sess. (1856 ­ 57) "Estimates for 5/3/94 (89­ Indian Services" (excerpts) 3) T­M­61 Ind. Cl. Comm., Dkt. #92 Upper 7/15/83 Skagit Tribe vs. United States, Not Admitted Findings of Fact (1960) 5/4/94 (89­ (excerpts) 3) T­M­62 Two photographs of Snohomish 7/12/83 canoes 5/4/94 (89­ 3) T­M­63 Ind.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • North: Lummi, Nooksack, Samish, Sauk-Suiattle, Stillaguamish
    Policy 7.01 Implementation Plan Region 2 North (R2N) Community Services Division (CSD) Serving the following Tribes: Lummi Nation, Nooksack Indian Tribe, Samish Indian Nation, Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe, Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians, Swinomish Tribal Community, Tulalip Tribes, & Upper Skagit Indian Tribe Biennium Timeframe: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Revised 04/2021 Annual Key Due Dates: April 1st - CSD Regional Administrators submit 7.01 Plan and Progress Reports (PPRs) to CSD HQ Coordinator. April 13th – CSD HQ Coordinator will submit Executive Summary & 7.01 PPRs to the ESA Office of Assistant Secretary for final review. April 23rd - ESA Office of the Assistant Secretary will send all 7.01 PPRs to Office of Indian Policy (OIP). 7.01 Meetings: January 17th- Cancelled due to inclement weather Next scheduled meeting April 17th, hosted by the Nooksack Indian Tribe. 07/07/20 Virtual 7.01 meeting. 10/16/20 7.01 Virtual meeting 01/15/21 7.01 Virtual 04/16/21 7.01 Virtual 07/16/21 7.01 Virtual Implementation Plan Progress Report Status Update for the Fiscal Year Goals/Objectives Activities Expected Outcome Lead Staff and Target Date Starting Last July 1 Revised 04/2021 Page 1 of 27 1. Work with tribes Lead Staff: to develop Denise Kelly 08/16/2019 North 7.01 Meeting hosted by services, local [email protected] , Tulalip Tribes agreements, and DSHS/CSD Tribal Liaison Memorandums of 10/18/2019 North 7.01 Meeting hosted by Understanding Dan Story, DSHS- Everett (MOUs) that best [email protected] meet the needs of Community Relations 01/17/2020 North 7.01 Meeting Region 2’s Administrator/CSD/ESA scheduled to be hosted by Upper Skagit American Indians.
    [Show full text]
  • Section II Community Profile
    Section II: Community Profile Section II Community Profile Hazard Mitigation Plan 2010 Update 9 [this page intentionally left blank] 10 Hazard Mitigation Plan 2010 Update Section II: Community Profile Community Profile Disclaimer: The Tulalip Tribes Tribal/State Hazard Mitigation Plan covers all the people, property, infrastructure and natural environment within the exterior boundaries of the Tulalip Reservation as established by the Point Elliott Treaty of January 22, 1855 and by Executive Order of December 23, 1873, as well as any property owned by the Tulalip Tribes outside of this area. Furthermore the Plan covers the Tulalip Tribes Usual and Accustom Fishing areas (U&A) as determined by Judge Walter E. Craig in United States of America et. al., plaintiffs v. State of Washington et. al., defendant, Civil 9213 Phase I, Sub Proceeding 80-1, “In Re: Tulalip Tribes’ Request for Determination of Usual and Accustom Fishing Places.” This planning scope does not limit in any way the Tulalip Tribes’ hazard mitigation and emergency management planning concerns or influence. This section will provide detailed information on the history, geography, climate, land use, population and economy of the Tulalip Tribes and its Reservation. Tulalip Reservation History Archaeologists and historians estimate that Native Americans arrived from Siberia via the Bering Sea land bridge beginning 17,000 to 11,000 years ago in a series of migratory waves during the end of the last Ice Age. Indians in the region share a similar cultural heritage based on a life focused on the bays and rivers of Puget Sound. Throughout the Puget Sound region, While seafood was a mainstay of the native diet, cedar trees were the most important building material.there were Cedar numerous was used small to tribesbuild both that subsistedlonghouses on and salmon, large halibut,canoes.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 H.R. 2961 Response of Brian Cladoosby, Chairman of the Senate
    H.R. 2961 Response of Brian Cladoosby, Chairman of the Senate, Swinomish Indian Tribal Community, to Additional Questions Questions from Representative Paul Cook 1. At the hearing, you indicated that as the Chairman of the Swinomish Indian Tribal Community (SITC) you do not support H.R. 375. Could you explain why the SITC does not support H.R. 375? The premise of this question is factually inaccurate. I testified that the Swinomish Indian Tribal Community neither supports nor opposes H.R. 375 because SITC does not have a Carcieri problem. This exchange can be viewed at the 54 minute, 56 second mark of the hearing webcast as maintained on the Committee’s webpage. As retrieved on June 17, 2019, the URL for this exchange is https://youtu.be/I9COgMJj86U?t=3236. 2. Do you agree that Samish is a federally recognized Indian tribe? If not, please explain the basis for your response. I agree that the Samish Indian Nation is a federally recognized Indian tribe by virtue of the Final Determination to Acknowledge the Samish Tribal Organization as a Tribe made by Assistant Secretary – Indian Affairs Ada Deer on November 8, 1995.1 However, it is important to note that the Samish Indian Nation was not recognized as a successor to the historic Samish Tribe. To the contrary, its claim to be a successor to the historic Samish Tribe was specifically rejected in the recognition proceedings. See: - Greene v. Lujan, Order Granting Federal Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment at 10 (No. C89-645Z, W.D. Wash. Sept. 19, 1990) (Samish Indian Nation, then known as the Samish Indian Tribe of Washington, is precluded by United States v.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Ceded Areas in Washington State
    Blaine Lynden Sumas Fern- Nooksack Oroville Metaline dale Northport Everson Falls Lummi Nation Metaline Ione Tribal Ceded Areas Bellingham Nooksack Tribe Tonasket by Treaty or Executive Order Marcus Samish Upper Kettle Republic Falls Indian Skagit Sedro- Friday Woolley Hamilton Conconully Harbor Nation Tribe Lyman Concrete Makah Colville Anacortes Riverside Burlington Tribe Winthrop Kalispel Mount Vernon Cusick Tribe La Omak Swinomish Conner Twisp Tribe Okanogan Colville Chewelah Oak Stan- Harbor wood Confederated Lower Elwha Coupeville Darrington Sauk-Suiattle Newport Arlington Tribes Klallam Port Angeles The Tulalip Tribe Stillaguamish Nespelem Tribe Tribes Port Tribe Brewster Townsend Granite Marysville Falls Springdale Quileute Sequim Jamestown Langley Forks Pateros Tribe S'Klallam Lake Stevens Spokane Bridgeport Elmer City Deer Everett Tribe Tribe Park Mukilteo Snohomish Grand Hoh Monroe Sultan Coulee Port Mill Chelan Creek Tribe Edmonds Gold Bothell + This map does not depict + Gamble Bar tribally asserted Index Mansfield Wilbur Creston S'Klallam Tribe Woodinville traditional hunting areas. Poulsbo Suquamish Millwood Duvall Skykomish Kirk- Hartline Almira Reardan Airway Tribe land Redmond Carnation Entiat Heights Spokane Medical Bainbridge Davenport Tribal Related Boundaries Lake Island Seattle Sammamish Waterville Leavenworth Coulee City Snoqualmie Duwamish Waterway Bellevue Bremerton Port Orchard Issaquah North Cheney Harrington Quinault Renton Bend Cashmere Rockford Burien Wilson Nation
    [Show full text]
  • 1855 Treaty of Point Elliott
    Treaty of Point Elliott, 1855 Articles of agreement and convention made and concluded at Muckl-te-oh, or Point Elliott, in the territory of Washington, this twenty-second day of January, eighteen hundred and fifty-five, by Isaac I. Stevens, governor and superintendent of Indian affairs for the saidTerritory, on the part of the United States, and the undersigned chiefs, head-men and delegates of the Dwamish, Suquamish, Sk-kahl-mish, Sam-ahmish, Smalh-kamish, Skope-ahmish, St-kah-mish, Snoqualmoo, Skai-wha-mish, N'Quentl-ma-mish, Sk-tah-le-jum, Stoluck-wha-mish, Sno-ho-mish, Skagit, Kik-i-allus, Swin-a-mish, Squin-ah-mish, Sah-ku- mehu, Noo-wha-ha, Nook-wa-chah-mish, Mee-see-qua-guilch, Cho-bah-ah-bish, and othe allied and subordinate tribes and bands of Indians occupying certain lands situated in said Territory of Washington, on behalf of said tribes, and duly authorized by them. ARTICLE 1. The said tribes and bands of Indians hereby cede, relinquish, and convey to the United States all their right, title, and interest in and to the lands and country occupied by them, bounded and described as follows: Commencing at a point on the eastern side of Admiralty Inlet, known as Point Pully, about midway between Commencement and Elliott Bays; thence eastwardly, running along the north line of lands heretofore ceded to the United States by the Nisqually, Puyallup, and other Indians, to the summit of the Cascade range of mountains; thence northwardly, following the summit of said range to the 49th parallel of north latitude; thence west, along said
    [Show full text]
  • TULALIP SERVICES DIRECTORY Winter 2018
    TULALIP SERVICES DIRECTORY Winter 2018 About Us The Tulalip Tribes is a federally recognized enclose a land-base of 22,000 acres, more Treaty of Point Elliott of January 22, 1855. MISSION Indian tribe located on the Tulalip than 50 percent of which is in federal trust Its boundaries were established by the 1855 Together we create a healthy and culturally Reservation in the mid-Puget Sound area status. The Reservation is rich with natural Treaty and by Executive Order of President vibrant community. bordered on the east by Interstate 5 and resources: marine waters, tidelands, fresh Ulysses S. Grant dated December 23, 1873. It the city of Marysville, Washington; on the water creeks and lakes, wetlands, forests and was created to provide a permanent home for VISION south by the Snohomish River; on the north developable land. The Tulalip Reservation the Snohomish, Snoqualmie, Skagit, Suiattle, We gathered at Tulalip are one people. We by the Fire Trail Road (140th St.); and on was reserved for the use and benefit of Samish and Stillaguamish Tribes and allied govern ourselves. We will arrive at a time the west by the waters of Puget Sound. The Indian tribes and bands signatory to the bands living in the region. when each and every person has become Tulalip Reservation exterior boundaries most capable. Introduction Table of Contents The Tulalip Tribes Services Directory aims to provide information on our departments’ Adult and Family Mental Wellness........... 3 Family Haven ............................ 24 programs and services, and eligibility requirements. The tribe provides many services to its members including early learning/Montessori, higher education assistance, health Asset Management .......................
    [Show full text]
  • Muckleshoot Library 2006 Community Study
    Engage. Muckleshoot Library 2006 Community Study Turn to us. The choices will surprise you. CONTENTS COMMUNITY OVERVIEW Executive Summary ......................................................................................... 1 Muckleshoot Tribe ............................................................................................ 1 Muckleshoot Library Service Area: Past and Present.............................................. 3 Geography ............................................................................................ 4 Transportation ....................................................................................... 5 Education and Schools ............................................................................ 5 Demographics ....................................................................................... 4 Business ............................................................................................... 4 History of the Muckleshoot Library: Past, Present & Future..................................... 6 COMMUNITY STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................... 8 BOARD PRESENTATION SLIDES MAPS • Muckleshoot Aerial Overview • Muckleshoot Library Circulation APPENDICES • Demographic Summary • School Statistics • School Test Scores • Race in Service Area • Age in Service Area • Languages Spoken at Home • Occupational Profile • Home Sales in Service Area • Tribes COMMUNITY OVERVIEW EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study encompasses the southeast sector of Auburn, Tribal Reservation lands and parts
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 STATE OF WASHINGTON; STATE OF NO. 10 OREGON; CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE CHEHALIS RESERVATION; COMPLAINT 11 CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE COOS, LOWER UMPQUA AND 12 SIUSLAW INDIANS; COW CREEK BAND OF UMPQUA TRIBE OF 13 INDIANS; DOYON, LTD.; DUWAMISH TRIBE; 14 CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE GRAND RONDE COMMUNITY OF 15 OREGON; HOH INDIAN TRIBE; JAMESTOWN S’KLALLAM TRIBE; 16 KALISPEL TRIBE OF INDIANS; THE KLAMATH TRIBES; MUCKLESHOOT 17 INDIAN TRIBE; NEZ PERCE TRIBE; NOOKSACK INDIAN TRIBE; PORT 18 GAMBLE S’KLALLAM TRIBE; PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS; 19 QUILEUTE TRIBE OF THE QUILEUTE RESERVATION; 20 QUINAULT INDIAN NATION; SAMISH INDIAN NATION; 21 CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF SILETZ INDIANS; SKOKOMISH INDIAN 22 TRIBE; SNOQUALMIE INDIAN TRIBE; SPOKANE TRIBE OF 23 INDIANS; SQUAXIN ISLAND TRIBE; SUQUAMISH TRIBE; SWINOMISH 24 INDIAN TRIBAL COMMUNITY; TANANA CHIEFS CONFERENCE; 25 CENTRAL COUNCIL OF THE TLINGIT & HAIDA INDIAN TRIBES 26 OF ALASKA; UPPER SKAGIT COMPLAINT 1 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON Complex Litigation Division 800 5th Avenue, Suite 2000 Seattle, WA 98104-3188 (206) 464-7744 1 INDIAN TRIBE; CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE 2 YAKAMA NATION; AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION; 3 ASSOCIATION OF KING COUNTY HISTORICAL ORGANIZATIONS; 4 CHINESE AMERICAN CITIZENS ALLIANCE; HISTORIC SEATTLE; 5 HISTORYLINK; MUSEUM OF HISTORY AND INDUSTRY; OCA 6 ASIAN PACIFIC ADVOCATES – GREATER SEATTLE; WASHINGTON 7 TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION; and WING LUKE 8 MEMORIAL FOUNDATION D/B/A WING LUKE MUSEUM, 9 Plaintiffs, 10 v. 11 RUSSELL VOUGHT, in his capacity as 12 Director of the OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET; 13 DAVID S.
    [Show full text]
  • Nooksack Indian Tribe Climate Change Adaptation Plan for Key Species and Habitats
    NOOKSACK INDIAN TRIBE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION PLAN FOR KEY SPECIES AND HABITATS Prepared by University of Washington Climate Impacts Group In Partnership with Nooksack Indian Tribe Natural and Cultural Resources Department Acknowledgments The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to the project partners who participated in workshops and document review. Nooksack Natural and Cultural Resources Project Lead: Oliver Grah, Water Resources Program Manager Participating stakeholders from Nooksack watershed: Nooksack Indian Tribe Natural Resource Department Oliver Grah Jezra Beaulieu Ross Cline Jr. Jeramiah Johnny George Swanaset Jr. Tom Cline Trevor Delgado Eric Stover Richard Auguston Tricia Cline Treva Coe Whatcom County Chris Elder Washington Department of Natural Resources Chris Hankey Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Wendy Cole U.S. Forest Service Jeremy Gilman Andrew Montgomery Sierra Pacific Industries John Gold Whatcom Land Trust Jennifer Mackey Gabe Epperson Evergreen Land Trust Holly O’Neil Ian Smith Alex Harris Natural Systems Design Susan Dickerson-Lange Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians Kip Killibrew University of Washington Climate Impacts Group Harriet Morgan Meade Krosby Funding Funding for this effort was provided by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Recommended citation: Morgan, H., and M. Krosby. 2020. Nooksack Indian Tribe Climate Change Adaptation Plan. A collaboration of University of Washington Climate Impacts Group and Nooksack Indian Tribe Natural and Cultural Resource Department. NOOKSACK TRIBE’S CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION PLAN 2 Image Citations Cover page image: Shuksan and Wildflowers, Sean Munson, licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0 Section header images: Executive Summary | Image Source: Wendy Cole, WA Department of Fish and Wildlife Section 1 | Image Source: 215.
    [Show full text]
  • For Publication United States Court Of
    FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE, No. 99-36224 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CV-99-00001-BJR LUMMI INDIAN NATION, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Barbara J. Rothstein, Chief District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted September 12, 2000--Seattle, Washington Filed December 13, 2000 Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge, Robert R. Beezer, and Michael Daly Hawkins, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Chief Judge Schroeder 16027 south to the present environs of Seattle, and particularly Bel- 16028 COUNSEL Harry L. Johnsen and Daniel A. Raas, Raas, Johnsen & Stuen, Bellingham, Washington for the defendant-appellant. Gregory M. O'Leary, Seattle Washington for the plaintiff- appellee. _________________________________________________________________ OPINION SCHROEDER, Chief Judge: This appeal represents one of a number of supplemental proceedings in the ongoing litigation concerning Indian fish- ing rights in the Pacific Northwest. All of these supplemental proceedings require the interpretation of Judge Boldt's opin- ion in United States v. Washington, 384 F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Wash. 1974), aff'd 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975). This proceeding concerns the interpretation of Judge Boldt's Finding of Fact Number 46, that describes the fishing grounds of the Lummi. It provides: In addition to the reef net locations listed above, the usual and accustomed fishing places of the Lummi Indians at treaty times included the marine areas of 16029 Northern Puget Sound from the Fraser River south to the present environs of Seattle, and particularly Bel- lingham Bay. Id.
    [Show full text]
  • 72 Muckleshoot Response
    Case 2:17-sp-00003-RSM Document 72 Filed 11/14/18 Page 1 of 2 1 The Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 AT SEATTLE 8 9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. C70-9213 RSM 10 Plaintiffs, Subproceeding No. 17-03 11 vs. MUCKLESHOOT TRIBE’S RESPONSE 12 STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., IN OPPOSTION TO TULALIP MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 13 Defendants. 14 15 The Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, as an intervenor-plaintiff in this case and as an interested 16 party in this subproceeding, opposes the Tulalip Tribe’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 17 18 (Dkt. 65) for the reasons set forth in Part I page 4, line 18 to page 7, line 11of the Port Gamble 19 and Jamestown S’Klallam Response to the Tulalip, Swinomish, and Upper Skagit Motions (Dkt. 20 70). The Tulalip Motion for Partial Summary Judgment should be denied. 21 Respectfully submitted this 14th day of November, 2018. 22 __/s/ Richard Reich __ ___ 23 Richard Reich, WSBA No. 8178 24 Ann Tweedy, WSBA No. 32957 Robert L. Otsea, Jr., WSBA No. 9367 25 Laura D. Weeks, WSBA No. 26992 Office of the Tribal Attorney 26 nd 39015-B 172 Avenue SE 27 Auburn, WA 98092 Telephone: (253) 876-3123 28 [email protected] Office of the Tribal Attorney MUCKLESHOOT TRIBE’S RESPONSE Muckleshoot Indian Tribe IN OPPOSTION TO TULALIP MOTION 39015-B 172nd Avenue SE FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY Auburn, WA 98092 (253) 939-3311 JUDGMENT – PAGE 1 Case 2:17-sp-00003-RSM Document 72 Filed 11/14/18 Page 2 of 2 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 3 4 I hereby certify that on November 14, 2018, I electronically filed the foregoing 5 MUCKLESHOOT TRIBE’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSTION TO TULALIP MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT.
    [Show full text]
  • Samish Reply
    Case: 20-35353, 11/06/2020, ID: 11884670, DktEntry: 48, Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SNOQUALMIE INDIAN TRIBE, a federally recognized No. 20-35346 Indian tribe on its own behalf and as parens patriae on behalf of its members, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON; et al., Defendants-Appellees, SAMISH INDIAN NATION, Intervenor. SNOQUALMIE INDIAN TRIBE, a federally recognized No. 20-35353 Indian tribe on its own behalf and as parens patriae on behalf of its members, Plaintiff, and SAMISH INDIAN NATION, Intervenor-Appellant, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON; et al., Defendants-Appellees. ON APPEAL FROM THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA, No. 3:19-cv-06227-RBL The Honorable Ronald B. Leighton, U.S. District Court Judge REPLY BRIEF OF INTERVENOR - APPELLANT SAMISH INDIAN NATION Case: 20-35353, 11/06/2020, ID: 11884670, DktEntry: 48, Page 2 of 34 Craig J. Dorsay, WSBA #9245 Lea Ann Easton, WSBA #38685 Kathleen M. Gargan, WSBA #56452 DORSAY & EASTON LLP 1737 NE Alberta St Suite 208 Portland, OR 97211-5890 Phone: (503) 790-9060 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Samish Indian Nation Case: 20-35353, 11/06/2020, ID: 11884670, DktEntry: 48, Page 3 of 34 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................................................................................... ii INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1 ARGUMENT ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]