DOCSLIB.ORG

PAPER Federalistthe MAGAZINE of the FEDERALIST SOCIETY • FEDSOC.ORG

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PAPER Federalistthe MAGAZINE of the FEDERALIST SOCIETY • FEDSOC.ORG THE Federalist PAPER FederalistTHE MAGAZINE OF THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY • FEDSOC.ORG Fall 2015 THE FEATURES Federalist PAPER THE MAGAZINE OF THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY • FEDSOC.ORG DIRECTORS/OFFICERS Steven G. Calabresi, Chairman 6 Student Division Hon. David M. McIntosh, Vice Chairman Gary Lawson, Secretary 8 Lawyers Chapters Brent O. Hatch, Treasurer T. Kenneth Cribb, Counselor 10 Faculty Division C. Boyden Gray Leonard A. Leo, Executive Vice President 12 Practice Groups Edwin Meese, III Eugene B. Meyer, President 14 Membership Michael B. Mukasey Lee Liberman Otis, Senior Vice President 15 Blog Prof. Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz BOARD OF VISITORS Mr. Christopher DeMuth, Co-Chairman THE FEDERALIST Hon. Orrin G. Hatch, Co-Chairman NO. 78 Prof. Lillian BeVier Hon. Elaine L. Chao Mr. George T. Conway Hon. Lois Haight Herrington The courts must declare Hon. Donald Paul Hodel Hon. Frank Keating, II “ Hon. Gale Norton Hon. Theodore B. Olson the sense of the law; and Mr. Andrew J. Redleaf Hon. Wm. Bradford Reynolds Ms. Diana Davis Spencer Theodore W. Ullyot if they should be disposed Hon. Gerald Walpin to excercise WILL instead of JUDGMENT, the consequence STAFF would equally be the President Eugene B. Meyer substitution of their Executive Vice President Senior Vice President & Director of pleasure to that of the Leonard A. Leo Faculty Division Lee Liberman Otis legislative body. Lawyers Chapters ” Lisa Budzynski Ezell, Vice President, Faculty Division Director Anthony Deardurff, Deputy Director Maria Marshall, Associate Director Christopher Goffos, Assistant Director Sarah Landeene, Assistant Director Gianna Burkhardt, Assistant Director Student Division Peter Redpath, Vice President, Director Practice Groups Austin Lipari, Deputy Director Dean Reuter, Vice President, Director Kate Alcantara, Associate Director C. William Courtney, Assistant Director Caroline Moore, Assistant Director, Jack Neblett, Assistant Director Director of Alumni Relations Timothy Courtney, Assistant Director Administration & Technology External Relations Douglas C. Ubben, Vice President, Jonathan Bunch, Vice President, Director Director of Finance THE FEDERALIST PAPER • FALL 2015 • FEDSOC.ORG 2015 • FALL PAPER THE FEDERALIST Zach Mayo, Deputy Director Amy Harper, Assistant Director of Finance Development C. David Smith, Vice President, Director Cynthia Searcy, Vice President, Director of Information Technology Katelynd Mahoney, Associate Director Tyler Lowe, Director of Online Brigid Hasson, Grants Administrator Education Daniel T. Richards, Digital Strategist International Affairs Joanmarie Davoli, Digital Education James P. Kelly, III, Director Specialist Paul Zimmerman, Deputy Director Rhonda Moaland, Office Manager Juli Nix, Director of Conferences Membership Katie McClendon, Director of Publications Peter Bisbee, Director Peggy Little, Director of Pro-Bono Center Maureen Collins, Coordinator 2 EDITOR’S LETTER Dear Friend of the Society, We are pleased to bring you the fall issue of The Federalist Paper, just in time for our National Lawyers Convention. We hope you enjoy the new look. Inside, we highlight some of our most exciting programs and publications from the past few months. You will also find a book review by a Supreme Court Justice and member profiles. 2015 • FEDSOC.ORG • FALL PAPER THE FEDERALIST Our Student Chapters have been busy recruiting new members and bringing in speakers for exciting debates. In this issue, we profile an outstanding student chapter leader—Dr. Riddhi Sohan Dasgupta, Co-President of the Berkeley Chapter—in an interview you won’t want to miss. Lawyers Chapters around the country have been very active this summer and fall, wrapping up a season of Supreme Court Round-Ups just in time for the new term. The Texas Chapters just held their state convention, and don’t miss upcoming regional conventions of the Florida Chapters and the Western Chapters. The Faculty Division is looking forward to the upcoming Annual Faculty Conference. It has also been keeping busy hosting faculty colloquiums and the brand new James Kent Academy for aspiring academics. The big story in Practice Groups is the explosion of interest in our Teleforum NATIONAL LAWYERS 18TH ANNUAL FACULTY Conference Calls and in the podcasts that CONVENTION CONFERENCE come from them. Learn more in this issue, Thursday–Saturday, Friday–Saturday, and see some pictures from recent practice November 12–14, 2015 January 8–9, 2016 group-sponsored events. Keep checking in with fedsoc.org (and like The Mayflower Hotel Sheraton New York and follow us on Facebook and Twitter) 1127 Connecticut Ave. NW Times Square Hotel to stay updated on our Teleforums, Washington, DC 20036 811 7th Ave. at 53rd St. SCOTUScasts, Practice Group Podcasts, New York, NY 10019 Engage articles, white papers, and more. We hope you plan to join us at our annual National Our annual faculty Please send your comments and suggestions Lawyers Convention. This conference is coming my way at [email protected]. I year’s theme is The Role soon. Register online at look forward to hearing from you! of Congress. Register fedsoc.org, and flip to Katie McClendon online now at fedsoc.org. page 10 for more details. 3 The Federalist Society is On this site, constitutional experts interact the most important civic with each other to explore the Constitution’s organization formed in history and what it means today. For each the last forty years. Even provision of the Constitution, scholars of academics are coming around different perspectives discuss what they agree to the conclusion. [I]deas upon, and what they disagree about. These refined at the Federalist experts were selected with the guidance of Society conferences have leaders of two prominent constitutional law made their way into Supreme organizations—The American Constitution Court opinions, in such areas as the Second Amendment, Society and The Federalist Society. federalism, and campaign • National Constitution Center finance regulation. Interactive Constitution • John O. McGinnis The Most Influential Legal Organization Library of Law & Liberty Blog A visit to a law school decades ago and a visit today would reveal strikingly different campuses. Before the 1980s, legal ideas generally considered conservative or libertarian were rare, and their defenders were regarded as borderline eccentric. Today, the environment is far more hospitable. Perhaps THE FEDERALIST PAPER • FALL 2015 • FEDSOC.ORG 2015 • FALL PAPER THE FEDERALIST the biggest spur for this transformation has been the Federalist Society. • Andrew Buttaro Join the Argument: The Irresistible Rise of the Federalist Society The Weekly Standard 4 THE Federalist PAPER THE MAGAZINE OF THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY • FEDSOC.ORG THE FEDERALIST PAPER • FALL 2015 • FEDSOC.ORG • FALL PAPER THE FEDERALIST The Federalist Society has a new headquarters Fed Soc’s national office moved from its old building to a brand new office space at 18th and I in northwest DC. The office is decorated with the unique artwork of Daniel Mahdavian. Visit our Facebook page to see pictures of the art and our website to see a video of the artist—or just flip through these pages for a sampling! 1776 I ST. NW 5 STUDENT DIVISION Left: Former U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey speaking at the Columbia Student Chapter’s Financial Enforcement seminar. The National Student Symposium is coming Above: Columbia students helping soon! Mark your calendars for February 26th at the seminar. and 27th, and join us at UVA Law to hear a slate of superior scholars talk about poverty, inequality, and the law. From the UVA Fed Soc facebook event page: On the topic of poverty, liberals claim to have the definitive response. That response includes paternalism, entitlements, higher taxes, and a generally bigger and more active government. Despite liberals’ insistence to the contrary, conservatives and libertarians also care about the poor, but they have their own ideas about how to lift people out of poverty. This symposium will explore these ideas. The Florida Student Chapter’s unofficial logo. SPOTLIGHT Recruitment season has already come and gone for our student chapters, and we have seen great success across the board. We look forward as always to a great year of bringing in conservative and libertarian speakers to offer alternatives to the reigning orthodoxy on law school campuses. THE FEDERALIST PAPER • FALL 2015 • FEDSOC.ORG 2015 • FALL PAPER THE FEDERALIST The lack of political diversity on campuses—including law school campuses—has been getting some attention lately, particularly through the work of scholars like those at the new Heterodox Academy blog. The Federalist Society, which has long been committed to combating this one-sidedness on law school campuses, continues its efforts by sponsoring events that present dissenting viewpoints, often in debate formats that allow professors to present their contrary views in response. Texas Student Chapter members at the 2015 Texas We believe this is important work and will continue to support Chapters Conference in September. diversity of viewpoint in law school and the legal profession. 6 Student Leader Profile Research and History. The jewel of Columbia is the CORE cur- Dr. Riddhi Sohan Dasgupta, riculum, which focuses on the President of the Berkeley Law classics and cultural literacy. Student Chapter But Columbia was special for another reason: I was asked to serve as assistant coach of We are thrilled to have the oppor- a moot court team at that law tunity to profile an outstanding school. Subsequently, I
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ted Cruz Promoted Himself and Conservative Causes As Texas’ Solicito
    FORMER STATE SOLICITORS GENERAL AND OTHER STATE AG OFFICE ATTORNEYS WHO ARE ACTIVE JUDGES by Dan Schweitzer, Director and Chief Counsel, Center for Supreme Court Advocacy, National Association of Attorneys General March 18, 2021 Former State Solicitors General (and Deputy Solicitors General) Federal Courts of Appeals (11) Jeffrey Sutton – Sixth Circuit (Ohio SG) Timothy Tymkovich – Tenth Circuit (Colorado SG) Kevin Newsom – Eleventh Circuit (Alabama SG) Allison Eid – Tenth Circuit (Colorado SG) James Ho – Fifth Circuit (Texas SG) S. Kyle Duncan – Fifth Circuit (Louisiana SG) Andrew Oldham – Fifth Circuit (Texas Deputy SG) Britt Grant – Eleventh Circuit (Georgia SG) Eric Murphy – Sixth Circuit (Ohio SG) Lawrence VanDyke – Ninth Circuit (Montana and Nevada SG) Andrew Brasher – Eleventh Circuit (Alabama SG) State High Courts (6) Stephen McCullough – Virginia Supreme Court Nels Peterson – Georgia Supreme Court Gregory D’Auria – Connecticut Supreme Court John Lopez – Arizona Supreme Court Sarah Warren – Georgia Supreme Court Monica Marquez – Colorado Supreme Court (Deputy SG) State Intermediate Appellate Courts (8) Kent Cattani – Arizona Court of Appeals Karen King Mitchell – Missouri Court of Appeals Kent Wetherell – Florida Court of Appeals (Deputy SG) Scott Makar – Florida Court of Appeals Timothy Osterhaus – Florida Court of Appeals Peter Sacks – Massachusetts Court of Appeals Clyde Wadsworth – Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals Gordon Burns – California Court of Appeal (Deputy SG) Federal District Court (11) Gary Feinerman – Northern
    [Show full text]
  • {PDF EPUB} Supreme Disorder Judicial Nominations and The
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Supreme Disorder Judicial Nominations and the Politics of America's Highest Court by Ilya Shapiro Trump Should Add These People to His Supreme Court List | Opinion. Four years ago, one of the ways that then-presidential candidate Donald Trump disrupted the campaign was by publicly revealing a list of potential Supreme Court nominees, which he later expanded and pledged to pick from. Justice Antonin Scalia's passing in February 2016 had elevated the political potency of the Supreme Court in the election even more directly than would the usual debates over abortion, guns and other legal controversies. If Hillary Clinton had been able to appoint Scalia's successor, so many policy areas would be headed in substantially different directions. Instead, Trump produced a list of judges that held the Republican coalition together and, ultimately, attracted swing voters in key states. Now, having appointed two justices from that list, the president heads into a re-election campaign where the Supreme Court, and judicial appointments more broadly, is no less of an issue than it was four years ago. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's recent cancer treatment is just the latest health concern this 87-year-old progressive icon has faced. She's obviously trying to outlive the Trump presidency, but another come-from-behind win this November would make that hard. And don't forget that Justice Stephen Breyer just turned 82—while Justice Clarence Thomas is 72, after serving nearly 30 years on the Court, and Justice Samuel Alito is 70 and may be getting restless after 15 years of his own service.
    [Show full text]
  • Senator Chuck Grassley and Judicial Confirmations
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Law Faculty Publications School of Law 2019 Senator Chuck Grassley and Judicial Confirmations Carl Tobias University of Richmond - School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.richmond.edu/law-faculty-publications Part of the Courts Commons, and the Judges Commons Recommended Citation Carl Tobias, Senator Chuck Grassley and Judicial Confirmations, 104 Iowa L. Rev. Online 31 (2019). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CARL_PDF PROOF FINAL 12.1.2019 FONT FIX (DO NOT DELETE) 12/4/2019 2:15 PM Senator Chuck Grassley and Judicial Confirmations Carl Tobias* I. 2015–16 PROCESSES ....................................................................... 33 A. THE 2015–16 DISTRICT COURT PROCESSES ............................... 34 1. The Nomination Process ................................................ 34 2. The Confirmation Process .............................................. 36 i. Committee Hearings ..................................................... 36 ii. Committee Votes ........................................................... 37 iii. Floor Votes ................................................................... 38 B. THE 2015–16 APPELLATE COURT PROCESSES ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • 13 Troubling Judicial Nominees You Missed This Year by Tony Hanna and Abbey Meller December 20, 2018
    13 Troubling Judicial Nominees You Missed This Year By Tony Hanna and Abbey Meller December 20, 2018 The bitter nomination process involving now-U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, which culminated in a contested confirmation vote on October 6, brought the importance of the federal judiciary to the forefront of American politi- cal consciousness. Around the country, tens of thousands of people rallied to protest the influence and effects of the judicial system on issues affecting everyone: health care reproductive rights, civil rights, disability justice, gun violence prevention, and more.1 Although Senate Republican leaders worked hard to shield Kavanaugh’s record from public oversight, hundreds of brave people risked arrest to protest both outside and inside Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing and, later, at the sham hear- ing2 to investigate the legitimate claim of sexual assault made against Kavanaugh by Christine Blasey Ford. Yet, while concerned citizens were rightfully paying attention to the important debate taking place over the future of the U.S. Supreme Court, the Trump administration and its allies in the Senate were also busy reshaping the lower federal courts. This year, the Senate confirmed a record 65 lower court judges3 to lifetime seats on the federal judiciary. An additional 67 judicial nominees are currently pending Senate action;4 the Senate could still vote on these nominations before the end of the year. In short, the Trump administration and its allies in the Senate are working at a breakneck pace to turn the federal courts into a hyper-conservative body that will implement a partisan political agenda from the bench.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Judiciary Tracker
    Federal Judiciary Tracker An up-to-date look at the federal judiciary and the status of President Trump’s judicial nominations October 23, 2020 Trump has had 225 federal judges confirmed while 25 seats remain vacant without a nominee Status of key positions 25 President Trump inherited 108 federal requiring Senate 41 judge vacancies confirmation As of October 22, 2020: ■ No nominee ■ Awaiting confirmation 157 judiciary positions have opened up ■ Confirmed during Trump’s presidency and either remain vacant or have been filled Total: 265 potential Trump nominations 225 Source: United States Courts Trump has had more circuit judges confirmed than the average of recent presidents at this point Number of Federal Judges Nominated and Confirmed Trump 161 53 2 ■ District court judge ■ Circuit court judge ■ Supreme Court judge Obama 128 30 2 Source: Federal Judicial Center Bush 165 35 Clinton 169 30 2 HW Bush 148 42 2 In three and a half years, Trump has confirmed a higher number of circuit judges as prior presidents in four years Number of Federal Judges Nominated and Confirmed Trump 161 53 2 ■ District court judge ■ Circuit court judge Obama 141 30 2 ■ Supreme Court judge Source: Federal Judicial Center Bush 168 35 Clinton 169 30 2 HW Bush 148 42 2 An overview of the Article III courts US District Courts US Court of Appeals Supreme Court Organization: Organization: Organization: • The nation is split into 94 • Federal judicial districts • The Supreme Court is the federal judicial districts are organized into 12 highest court in the US • The District of Columbia circuits, which each have a • There are nine justices on and four US territories court of appeals.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics of Judicial Elections 2015 16
    THE POLITICS OF JUDICIAL ELECTIONS 201516 Who Pays for Judicial Races? By Alicia Bannon, Cathleen Lisk, and Peter Hardin With Douglas Keith, Laila Robbins, Eric Velasco, Denise Roth Barber, and Linda Casey Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law National Institute on Money and State Politics CONTENTS Introduction 1 Chapter One: Supreme Court Election Spending Reaches New Heights 4 Spending Overview: 2015-16 Supreme Court Election Cycle 4 Notable Trends: Secret Money and Record Outside Spending 7 Profiled Races: What Factors Contribute to High-Cost Elections? 12 The Bigger Picture: Big Money Races Leave A Mark On A Majority of Elected Courts 15 State Courts as Political Targets 19 Chapter Two: A Closer Look at Interest Groups 21 Overview 21 The Transparency Problem 22 Wisconsin’s Weak Recusal Standards Undermine Fair Courts 26 The Major Players 27 A Parallel Problem: Dark Money and Judicial Nominations 30 Chapter 3: Television Ads and the Politicization of Supreme Court Races 32 Overview 32 A More Pervasive Negative Tone 33 Ad Themes 36 Ad Spotlight 38 Conclusion 40 Appendix 42 IV CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES Introduction Chapter One Estimated Spending on State Supreme Court Races, 2015-16 5 Number of Judges Elected in $1 Million-Plus Elections by Cycle 6 State Supreme Court Election Spending by Cycle (2016 Dollars) 8 Outside Spending by Interest Groups (2016 Dollars) 9 Spending Breakdown for 2015-16 Supreme Court Races 9 Contributions to Candidates by Sector, 2015-16 11 Top 10 Candidate Fundraisers, 2015-16 11 The Rise of Million Dollar Courts 16 Million Dollar Courts in 2016 17 Chapter Two Top 10 Outside Spenders and Secret Money, 2015-16 23 Outside Group Spending: Dark, Gray, and Transparent Money, 2015-16 24 States with Unreported Outside Spending, 2015-16 25 Chapter 3 Total TV Spending, 2015-16 33 Number of Television Ad Spots by Cycle 34 Total TV Spending by Cycle (2016 Dollars) 34 Ad Tone Analysis: Groups vs.
    [Show full text]
  • President Donald Trump's War on Federal Judicial Diversity
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Law Faculty Publications School of Law 2019 President Donald Trump's War on Federal Judicial Diversity Carl Tobias University of Richmond - School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.richmond.edu/law-faculty-publications Part of the Courts Commons Recommended Citation Carl Tobias, President Donald Trump's War on Federal Judicial Diversity, 54 Wake Forest L. Rev. 531 (2019). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP'S WAR ON FEDERAL JUDICIAL DIVERSITY Carl Tobias• In Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign, the candidate promised to nominate and confirm federal judges who would possess ideologically conservative perspectives. Across President Trump's first twenty-seven months, the chief executive implemented numerous actions to effectuate his campaign pledge. Indeed, federal judicial selection may be the area in which President Trump has achieved the most substantial success throughout his first twenty-seven months in office, as many of Trump's supporters within and outside the government recognize. Nevertheless, the chief executive's achievements, principally when nominating and confirming stalwart conservatives to the appellate court bench, have imposed numerous critical detrimental effects. Most important for the purposes of this Article, a disturbing pattern that implicates a stunning paucity of minority nominees materialized rather quickly. Moreover, in the apparent rush to install staunch conservative ideologues in the maximum possible number of appeals court vacancies, the Republican White House and Senate majority have eviscerated numerous invaluable, longstanding federal judicial selection conventions.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump's Judicial Assault on Lgbt Protections
    SPECIAL REPORT 2019 TRUMP’S JUDICIAL ASSAULT ON LGBT PROTECTIONS AFTER THREE YEARS OF TRUMP NOMINEES, BIAS AND BIGOTRY REMAIN THE NORM INTRODUCTION AS WE NEAR THE END OF THE THIRD YEAR OF THE TRUMP-PENCE ADMINISTRATION, THE PROMISE OF A FAIR AND INDEPENDENT JUDICIARY HAS COME UNDER INCREASING THREAT. The Trump Administration, enabled by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, and advised by a powerful but shrouded network of right wing organizations, has worked tirelessly to confirm ideologically driven judges to lifetime appointments in order to further their ultra- conservative policy objectives through the Federal courts. As an organization that has defended the rights of LGBT people in the courts for over 40 years, Lambda Legal believes that it has an obligation to the communities that we serve to sound the alarm about the impact that these nominees will have on the ability of LGBT people to receive fair and impartial justice. THREE KEY TAKEAWAYS FROM OUR ANALYSIS 1 After three years, the overall story remains the same; over 1 in 3 of Trump’s circuit court nominees (36%) have a demonstrated history of anti-LGBT bias. This year they included: Steven Menashi, who supported banning LGB people from the military and denigrated the marriage equality ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges. Lawrence Van Dyke who claimed that marriage equality harms children and society. Eric Murphy, who argued the opposing side in Obergefell v. Hodges. Chad Readler, who had his fingerprints on almost every Trump-Pence initiative seeking to undermine LGBT protections while serving in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Federalist Paper Template
    THE Federalist PAPER THE MAGAZINE OF THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY • FEDSOC.ORG Winter 2019 THE FEATURES PAPER FederalistTHE MAGAZINE OF THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY • FEDSOC.ORG BOARD OF DIRECTORS BOARD OF VISITORS Prof. Steven G. Calabresi, Chairman Mr. Christopher DeMuth, Co-Chairman Hon. David M. McIntosh, Vice Chairman Hon. Orrin G. Hatch, Co-Chairman Prof. Gary Lawson, Secretary Prof. Lillian BeVier 4 National Lawyers Mr. Brent O. Hatch, Treasurer Mr. George T. Conway Convention Hon. T. Kenneth Cribb Ms. Kimberly O. Dennis Hon. C. Boyden Gray Mr. Michael W. Gleba Mr. Leonard A. Leo, Executive VP Hon. Lois Haight Herrington 6 Student Division Hon. Edwin Meese, III Hon. Donald Paul Hodel Mr. Eugene B. Meyer, President Hon. Frank Keating, II 8 Lawyers Chapters Hon. Michael B. Mukasey Hon. Gale Norton Hon. Lee Liberman Otis, Senior VP Hon. Theodore B. Olson Prof. Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz Mr. Andrew J. Redleaf 10 Faculty Division Hon. William Bradford Reynolds Ms. Diana Davis Spencer 12 Practice Groups Mr. Theodore W. Ullyot 14 Article I & STAFF International President Executive Vice President Senior Vice President Eugene B. Meyer Leonard A. Leo Lee Liberman Otis 15 Digital Student Division Lawyers Chapters Peter Redpath, VP & Director Lisa Budzynski Ezell, VP & Director 16 State Courts Kamron Kompani, Deputy Director Sarah Landeene, Deputy Director Kate Alcantara, Deputy Director Katherine Fugate, Associate Director 17 RTP Faculty Division Practice Groups Lee Liberman Otis, Director Dean Reuter, VP & General Counsel 18 Membership Anthony Deardurff,
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Report
    Trump’s Attacks on Our Justice System: 2017 - 2019 1 Contents Executive Summary 3 President Trump’s Impact on the Courts 5 Trump’s Impact by the Numbers 12 Undermining Democracy: Siding with the Wealthy and Powerful Over Everyday Americans 15 Thwarting Public Protections for Health and Safety 15 Access to Affordable Health Care 17 Worker Protections 18 Environmental Protections 19 Gun Violence 19 Education 20 Consumer Rights 21 Eroding Civil Rights and Equality Protections 22 People of Color 22 Women’s Equality and Reproductive Justice 24 LGBTQ Equality 26 Persons with Disabilities 27 Immigrant Rights 29 Native American Rights 30 Undermining Our Democracy 31 Executive Power 33 Degrading of the Senate’s Advice and Consent Duty 35 Changing Senate Rules to Confirm Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh 35 ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE 2 Contents Sullying the Process to Confirm Kavanaugh 35 Changing Senate Rules and Norms to Confirm Lower Court Nominees 37 Hiding and Obscuring Key Data 39 Misleading the Senate 40 Hearings Stacked to Minimize Vetting 42 Condoning Nominees who Lack Basic Qualifications 42 Future Outlook 44 Progressives are Increasingly Galvanized 44 Progressives Will Be Ready On January 1, 2021 45 Progress Was Made on Supreme Court Ethics Reform 46 Appendix 47 Appendices current as of January 13, 2020. Updated appendices available on our website. Alliance for Justice is a national association of over 120 organizations, representing a broad array of groups committed to progressive values and the creation of an equitable, just, and free society. Since 1979, AFJ has been the leader in advocating for a fair and independent justice system, preserving access to the courts, and empowering others to stand up and fight for their causes.
    [Show full text]
  • Opinions of Trump Appellate Judges on Trump Supreme Court Short List
    Opinions of Trump Appellate Judges on Trump Supreme Court Short List Eight of the 37 Trump judges on the federal courts of appeals are also on Trump’s “short list” from which, he has stated, he will select any future Supreme Court justices. The opinions written or joined by these eight Trump judges are very troubling, and it would raise serious concerns if any of these judges receive a Supreme Court nomination. Each such opinion is discussed briefly below, with a link to the more detailed explanation in the relevant PFAW Confirmed Judges, Confirmed Fears report. Don Willett (5th Circuit) Along with Trump judges Ho, Engelhardt, and Oldham, Willett voted to allow a devastating Louisiana anti-choice law to take effect, a decision that was temporarily reversed by a 5-4 Supreme Court vote in which Gorsuch and Kavanaugh dissented. Willett cast the deciding vote to give Trump the power to fire the head of an independent housing finance agency set up by Congress. Willett cast the deciding vote to affirm a longer prison term for an immigrant, despite a finding of plain error and a dissent by a Bush appointee. Along with Trump judges Ho, Duncan, and Engelhardt, Willett strongly urged reconsideration of a ruling that upheld a federal gun safety law. Along with Trump judge Ho, Willett voted to excuse a police department’s decision to conceal evidence and to reverse a damages verdict for a falsely imprisoned innocent man. Amul Thapar and Joan Larsen (6th Circuit) Along with Trump judges Bush and Nalbandian, Judges Thapar and Larsen cast deciding votes to uphold Ohio’s law barring funding to Planned Parenthood for health care because it provides abortions with non-state funds.
    [Show full text]
  • Courts, Confirmations, & Consequences
    Courts, Confirmations, & Consequences: How Trump Restructured the Federal Judiciary and Ushered in a Climate of Unprecedented Hostility toward LGBTQ+ People and Civil Rights An Analysis by Lambda Legal January 2021 OVERVIEW The Trump-Pence Administration has caused for more than 40 years, Lambda Legal has fought this unprecedented harm to the promise of a fair and harm at every turn. We have repeatedly sounded the alarm independent federal judiciary. Enabled and abetted by about these dangerous nominees and have continually Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Senate warned about the impact that they will have on the ability Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, and of LGBTQ+ people and people living with HIV to receive advised by a powerful but shrouded network of far-right fair and impartial justice. The Trump-Pence wing organizations, the Trump-Pence Administration has Administration will soon no longer be in the White been laser-focused on confirming ideologically-driven House, but the lifetime tenure of the over two hundred judges to lifetime appointments in order to further their Trump-appointed judges will have only just begun. ultra-conservative policy objectives through the federal Since Trump’s inauguration in January 2017, Lambda courts. After nearly four years of pushing through a Legal’s team of legal experts mounted an aggressive and judicial nominations at breakneck speed, the actions of painstaking four-year effort to meticulously monitor, Senate Republicans during the waning hours of this track, document, and analyze the extent to which Trump’s administration – from a rushed confirmation of a Supreme influence over the federal judiciary would impact the lives Court justice while a national election was already of LGBTQ+ people and people living with HIV.
    [Show full text]