DOCSLIB.ORG

Freeing Investor Capital for Small Business

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Freeing Investor Capital for Small Business CONTENTS Introduction 1 Crowdfunding 3 JOBS Act of 2012 4 Crowdfunding at the state level 5 Opening 401(k)s to intrastate crowdfunding 7 Conclusion 8 About the author 8 research or product development or seek out new customers. Enabling small businesses to access the capital they need is an urgent priority of public policy. Yet small businesses are R STREET POLICY STUDY NO. 36 having a harder time getting capital through the traditional June 2015 financial system. Banks are less willing to lend to small businesses than ever before, both because of deteriorating creditworthiness after the recent economic downturn and because small-business FREEING INVESTOR CAPITAL lending is simply no longer as profitable. More stringent banking regulations impose additional costs and the wave FOR SMALL BUSINESS of bank mergers (particularly, the decline of community banks)3 has diminished the local knowledge of community Oren Litwin businesses that used to be banks’ competitive advantage.4 Additionally, lacking a strong secondary market for small- INTRODUCTION business loans, in contrast to the market for conforming mortgage loans,5 banks are unwilling to carry small-business Something has gone wrong with small business in America. lending risks on their books. The business of banking instead For the first time since statistics were kept, the rate of busi- has turned disproportionately to providing consumer and ness failure now exceeds the rate of business creation.1 It housing loans.6 isn’t that businesses are failing more often than usual; rather, new business creation has slowed markedly and the rate con- 3. Institute for Local Self-Reliance, “Access to Capital for Local Businesses,” April 15, tinues to slow further. At a time when the labor-force par- 2014. http://ilsr.org/rule/financing-local-businesses/ ticipation rate is at multi-decade lows,2 the moribund state 4. Karen Gordon Mills and Brayden McCarthy, “The State of Small-Business Lending: of small business is alarming. Credit Access During the Recovery and How Technology May Change the Game,” Harvard Business School, July 22, 2014. http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20 Files/15-004_09b1bf8b-eb2a-4e63-9c4e-0374f770856f.pdf Summarized in Karen As with any large problem, there are many contributing fac- Mills, “Why Small-Business Lending Has Not Recovered,” Forbes, Aug. 4, 2014. http:// tors. A critical one has been the shortage of capital for busi- www.forbes.com/sites/hbsworkingknowledge/2014/08/04/why-small-business-lend- ing-has-not-recovered/; Robert Adams and Jacob Gramlich, “Where Are All the New ness investment, particularly for small businesses. Without Banks? The Role of Regulatory Burden in New Charter Creation,” Federal Reserve, sources of capital, new businesses with irregular cash flow 2014. http://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/feds/2014/files/2014113pap.pdf ; Rework America (Markle Economic Future Initiative), America’s Moment: Creating (or none at all) often are unable to meet payroll, invest in Opportunity in the Connected Age, W.W. Norton, 2015: pps. 97-100, 108; cf. Eugene Fama, “What’s Different About Banks?” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 15, 1985: 29-39; cf. Milton Marquis, “What’s Different About Banks—Still?” FRBSFEconomic Letter, April 6, 2001. <http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/letter/2001/ 1. Source: U.S. Census, Business Dynamics Statistics. See also Ian Hathaway and el2001-09.html> Robert E. Litan, “Declining Business Dynamism in the United States: A Look at States and Metros,” Brookings Institution, May 2014. http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/ 5. America’s Moment 93, 103 research/files/papers/2014/05/declining%20business%20dynamism%20litan/declin- ing_business_dynamism_hathaway_litan.pdf 6. America’s Moment 92-3. Of course, the supposed safety of housing loans became the foundation for a dizzying superstructure of derivatives, culminating in the 2008 2. Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Labor Force Participation Rate,” United States Depart- banking crisis. Perhaps a reasonable level of riskiness in banking would have been ment of Labor, June 2, 2015. http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000 healthier overall. R STREET POLICY STUDY: 2015 FREEING INVESTOR CAPITAL FOR SMALL BUSINESS 1 To some degree, loan-guarantee programs offered by the in investible assets, individual income of at least $200,000 Small Business Association mitigate the risks to banks and or household income of at least $300,000 per year).13 The make them more willing to lend to new businesses. Indeed, SEC’s Accredited Investor regulations have been justified SBA-guaranteed loans grew to more than $30 billion in the on grounds that investments not validated by national regu- 2011 fiscal year, compared to $17.9 billion in FY2009 and $22.6 lators are too risky for typical unsophisticated investors.14 billion in FY2010.7 After a slowdown, lending recovered to Instead, regular investors are generally told to invest in pur- almost $30 billion in FY2014. During that year, the SBA also portedly “safer” publicly traded securities. At a time when provided the bulk of the $5.5 billion loaned to small busi- many decry growing inequality, there is a certain irony that nesses by Small Business Investment Companies (SBICs).8 federal law reserves the most important class of investments to the wealthiest investors.15 However, SBA eligibility rules tend to require that poten- tial borrowers must be unable to secure financing from any Only about 8.5 million Americans meet today’s Accredited other source. Rather than supporting those startups with the Investor requirements. The SEC is considering revisions to best prospects, the SBA’s eligibility rules tend to select for the standard that may cut that number by at least half.16 And marginal businesses.9 Moreover, the volume of such loans few Accredited Investors actually are involved in venture is insufficient to meet the market’s needs. In the 2014 Small capital or angel investing,17 as such investments carry sub- Business Credit Survey, more than half of small and startup stantial risk and government regulations make them non- businesses reported they were unable to secure any bank transferrable before an initial public offering.18 They are thus credit at all.10 Many small businesses instead rely on business not suitable for many who desire predictable investments credit cards. About 37 percent of small businesses surveyed and liquid assets. All told, the American venture-capital in May 2012 reported they relied on credit cards, which car- sector invested more than $33 billion in private companies ried an average interest rate of 15.6 percent.11 in 201319 and $48 billion in 2014.20 By contrast, U.S. IPOs raised $55 billion21 and $85 billion22 the past two years, while Some types of small businesses draw outside investment defined-contribution retirement plans invested $133 billion from the venture capital community, but this is a very limited and $153 billion in the securities markets.23 Even state lotter- pool. Federal regulations on the securities industry restrict who can own investments not registered with the Securi- 13. Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, “Investor Bulletin: Accredited Inves- tors,” U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Sept. 23, 2013. http://www.investor. ties and Exchange Commission (SEC) and publicly traded on gov/news-alerts/investor-bulletins/investor-bulletin-accredited-investors the securities exchanges. For the most part, venture capital 14. See, for example, the attitudes expressed by SEC Commissioner Luis Aguilar in is carried out under the exemptions of Regulation D of the “Revising the ‘Accredited Investor’ Definition to Better Protect Investors,” U.S. Securi- Securities Act of 1933,12 which ensure that average investors ties and Exchange Commission, Dec. 17, 2014. http://www.sec.gov/news/statement/ spch121714laa.html are prohibited from participating. To be involved in ven- 15. Cf. America’s Moment 4. ture capital, you must either be an institutional investor, or an “Accredited Investor” (someone with at least $1 million 16. Luis Aguilar, ibid. http://www.sec.gov/news/statement/spch121714laa.html; GAO- 13-640, “Securities and Exchange Commission: Alternative Criteria for Qualifying as an Accredited Investor Should be Considered,” U.S. Government Accountability Office, July 2013. http://www.gao.gov/assets/660/655963.pdf 7. SBA News, “Jobs Act Loan Incentives Led to Record SBA Loan Approval Volume,” U.S. Small Business Administration, Oct. 5, 2011. https://www.sba.gov/content/jobs- 17. That is, investing in startups (often for friends and family) without going through a act-loan-incentives-led-record-sba-loan-approval-volume-supporting-over-30-bil- formal venture capital fund. lion-0 18. Some in the SEC support the idea of a “venture exchange” that would permit non- 8. SBICs are privately managed investment funds that are exempt from registering public shares to be traded. See Luis Aguilar, “The Need for Greater Secondary Market with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) provided that they invest speci- Liquidity for Small Businesses,” U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, March fied percentages of their portfolio in small business loans, per the Small Business 4, 2015. http://www.sec.gov/news/statement/need-for-greater-secondary-market- Investment Act of 1958. See “Agency Financial Report Fiscal Year 2014: Today’s SBA: liquidity-for-small-businesses.html Smart, Bold, Accessible,” U.S. Small Business Association, Nov. 17, 2014. https://www. 19. Wilmer Hale, “2014 Venture Capital Report.” http://www.wilmerhale.com/upload- sba.gov/sites/default/files/aboutsbaarticle/1-FY%202014%20Agency%20Finan- edFiles/Shared_Content/Editorial/Publications/Documents/2014-WilmerHale-VC- cial%20Report.pdf; Cf. “Investing in an SBIC,” U.S. Small Business Association, https:// Report.pdf www.sba.gov/content/investing-with-sbic 20. PricewaterhouseCoopers/National Venture Capital Association, “Annual Venture 9. America’s Moment, pg.104. Capital Investment Tops $48 Billion in 2014, Reaching Highest Level in Over a Decade, 10.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ppm Private Placement Memorandum Startup Examples
    Ppm Private Placement Memorandum Startup Examples Bioplasmic Alvin sometimes depictured any baseboards buddled ought. If unnoted or oozing King usually carbonados his coprosterol thatengirdles unavailableness. injunctively or laurel perplexedly and vocally, how upbeat is Fairfax? Tanner still blaspheme damn while jobless Barny misused As private placement memorandum details I accidentally started a business and lost nothing for business where ill start I study a. Growth company as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act. Include startup may not in the rest of your film finance the placement memorandum distributed to, in a company operating history, that is a venture capital markets in. Matlab builtin function rot90Ak can be used to rotate images in 90 degrees Here time an example using rot90 Assign K1 for 90 degree 2 for 10 3 for 270 and 4 for 360 The cut image card be rotated 90 degrees Another matlab builtin function flipudA can be used to retrospect the image 90 degrees. Early-stage company growth and look what past examples Facebook is a fruitless one. For readers unfamiliar with legitimate term while Private Placement Memorandum or PPM. To align private placement examples let's first purge that. Placement memorandum are private offerings made in reliance on Rule 506. INVESTOR QUALIFICATION STANDARDS PPM 31 SET FORTH with THIS. In 2016 the definition of an accredited investor was expanded to include. I achieve a lot when my securities law practice advising savvy startup owners. 1 Confidential Private Placement Offering Memorandum. Preemptive rights or protective provisions for example. A so called incubator fund staff is an alternative for green fund startups who made not.
    [Show full text]
  • Charitable Crowdfunding: Who Gives, to What, and Why?
    APRIL 2021 Charitable Crowdfunding: Who Gives, to What, and Why? RESEARCHED AND WRITTEN BY Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy RESEARCHED AND WRITTEN BY — Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy The Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy is dedicated to improving philanthropy to improve the world by training and empowering students and professionals to be innovators and leaders who create positive and lasting change. The school offers a comprehensive approach to philanthropy through its academic, research and international programs, and through The Fund Raising School, Lake Institute on Faith & Giving, Mays Family Institute on Diverse Philanthropy, and Women’s Philanthropy Institute. Learn more at www.philanthropy.iupui.edu INDIANA UNIVERSITY LILLY FAMILY SCHOOL OF PHILANTHROPY PROJECT TEAM — Una O. Osili, PhD Associate Dean for Research and International Programs Jonathan Bergdoll, MA Applied Statistician Andrea Pactor, MA Project Consultant Jacqueline Ackerman, MPA Associate Director of Research, Women’s Philanthropy Institute Peter Houston, MBA Visiting Research Associate With special thanks to Dr. Wendy Chen, Dr. Debra Mesch, and Dr. Pamala Wiepking for reviewing the survey questionnaire. The survey was fielded by AmeriSpeak at NORC. The report was designed by Luke Galambos at Galambos + Associates. This research was completed with funding from Facebook. The findings and conclusions contained within are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect official positions or policies of Facebook. INDIANA UNIVERSITY LILLY FAMILY SCHOOL OF PHILANTHROPY — 301 University Boulevard, Suite 3000, Indianapolis, IN 46202 317.278.8902 / [email protected] / @IUPhilanthropy / www.philanthropy.iupui.edu Contents Introduction ................................................... 02 Key Findings ................................................. 02 Background ................................................... 05 What is Crowdfunding? ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Guidance at Lexis Practice Advisor®
    Practical guidance at Lexis Practice Advisor® Lexis Practice Advisor® offers beginning-to-end practical guidance to support attorneys’ work in specific legal practice areas. Grounded in the real-world experience of expert practitioner-authors, our guidance ranges from practice notes and legal analysis to checklists and annotated forms. In addition, Lexis Practice Advisor provides everything you need to advise clients and draft your work product in 14 different practice areas. Douglas S. Ellenoff Market Trends: Crowdfunding by Douglas S. Ellenoff, Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP (all market data by Sherwood Neiss and Jason Best, Crowdfund Capital Advisors) Overview Unlike other provisions of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the JOBS Act), Regulation Crowdfunding securities-based crowdfunding, also known as Title III, had only slightly more than six months of results by the end of 2016, since this particular provision only went into effect May 16. Regulation Crowdfunding prescribes rules that permit securities-based crowdfunding by private companies without registering the offering with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pursuant to new Section 4(a)(6) (15 U.S.C.S. § 77d) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act). Consequently, pursuant to this provision, this statutorily permitted form of crowdfunding is only permissible in the United States, although there are versions of Regulation Crowdfunding in other jurisdictions. During the limited six-month initial period of Regulation Crowdfunding, there has been a slow but steady increase in all aspects of this emerging industry. On the day of implementation, there were fewer than 10 Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) approved crowdfunding portals and nearly 25 entrepreneurial campaigns posted to those same sites for investor consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Crowdfunding Schemes in Europe
    Crowdfunding Schemes in Europe by David Röthler and Karsten Wenzlaff EENC Report, September 2011 Crowdfunding Schemes in Europe by David Röthler and Karsten Wenzlaff EENC Report, September 2011 This document has been prepared by David Röthler and Karsten Wenzlaff on behalf of the European Expert Network on Culture (EENC). A draft was peer-reviewed by EENC member Aleksandra Uzelac. This paper reflects the views only of the EENC authors and the European Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. The EENC was set up in 2010 at the initiative of Directorate-General for Education and Culture of the European Commission (DG EAC), with the aim of contributing to the improvement of policy development in Europe. It provides advice and support to DG EAC in the analysis of cultural policies and their implications at national, regional and European levels. The EENC involves 17 independent experts and is coordinated by Interarts and Culture Action Europe. About the authors David Röthler, Master´s degree in Law, trainer, consultant and journalist in the fields of political communication, media and European funding. He teaches at journalism schools in Austria and Germany. His focus is on participatory journalism, social media and new funding schemes e.g. crowdfunding and social payment. Furthermore he has extensive experience with the management of international projects. He is founder of the consultancy PROJEKTkompetenz.eu GmbH. Personal Weblog: politik.netzkompetenz.at Karsten Wenzlaff is the founder of the Institute of Communications for Social Communication (ikosom), a Berlin-based research facility for new forms of electronic technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Resources for Startups and Entrepreneurs Microwork
    Resources for Startups and Entrepreneurs 1. Microwork 2. Sharing Economy 3. The Investment Cycle 4. EU SME and Startup Funds 5. Microlending, Microfinancing, and Microcredit 6. Crowdfunding (P2P Financing) 7. Alternative Lending 8. Vendor/PO Financing and Online Factoring 9. Other Sources of Financing 10 Resources Microwork (get paid for fulfilling tasks online) Amazon Mechanical Turk LiveOps InnoCentive Samasource Paid online survey sites Kindle Direct Publishing (self-publishing) Craiglist (classified ads) Monster (find a job) Newsy or CNN iReport (citizen journalism) YouTube Partner (share ad revenues) CCNow (accept credit cards and PayPal payments) Amazon Associates (get a commission on referred sales) EBay or Etsy or Alibaba (sell things, including handicrafts) Shareconomy (Sharing Economy) View introductory video AirBnB or Couchsurfing (share your home for a fee) Eatwith or Kitchensurfing (host a meal and get paid) Vayable (become a tour guide) Uber or Lyft or Sidecar (give rides in your car) BorrowedBling or Girl Meets Dress or Rent the Runway (lend your jewelry and haute couture for a fee) Yerdle or Snap Goods (Simplist) or Open Shed (swap, rent, or borrow things) Relay Rides or Getaround (rent out your car) Favor Delivery (get deliveries – or deliver) Task Rabbit (handyman services) Waze (community rides) The Investment Cycle Register firm in target market Doing Business Equity structure Common stock Stock options Convertible debt Series A Preferred Stock (convertible to common stock on IPO/sale) Investment Cycle - Overview Seed
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Management and Business Administration Central Europe Vol
    „Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe” Vol. 26, No. 1/2018, p. 49–78, ISSN 2450-7814; e-ISSN 2450-8829 © 2018 Authors. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) How do we study crowdfunding? An overview of methods and introduction to new research agenda1 Agata Stasik2, Ewa Wilczyńska3 Submitted: 19.07.2017. Final acceptance: 12.12.2017 Abstract Purpose: Crowdfunding is a global phenomenon of rising significance and impact on different areas of business and social life, investigated across many academic disciplines. The goal of the article is to present the variety of methods applied in crowdfunding research, assess their strengths and weaknesses, offer the typology of methodological approaches, and suggest the most promising direction for further studies. Design/methodology: The paper is based on the review of the most recent academic and industry lite­ rature on crowdfunding and own analysis of data presented by crowdfunding platforms’ operators. Findings: The article incorporates interrelations of methods, goals of inquiries, and types of results to propose a typology of methodological approaches that researchers currently apply to crowdfund­ ing: from platform­centred to multi­sited. The authors discuss the advantages and limitations of the identified approaches with the use of multiple examples of recent and most influential studies from the field and propose the most urgent direction of future inquiries. Research limitations/implications: The overview renders crowdfunding studies more accessible for potential newcomers to the field and strengthens transdisciplinary discussion on crowdfunding. Despite the broad variety of the analyzed articles that reflect the newest trends, the sample is not representative in the statistical meanings of the term.
    [Show full text]
  • Dare to Venture: Data Science Perspective on Crowdfunding Ruhaab Markas Southern Methodist University, [email protected]
    SMU Data Science Review Volume 2 | Number 1 Article 19 2019 Dare to Venture: Data Science Perspective on Crowdfunding Ruhaab Markas Southern Methodist University, [email protected] Yisha Wang Southern Methodist University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/datasciencereview Part of the Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations Commons Recommended Citation Markas, Ruhaab and Wang, Yisha (2019) "Dare to Venture: Data Science Perspective on Crowdfunding," SMU Data Science Review: Vol. 2 : No. 1 , Article 19. Available at: https://scholar.smu.edu/datasciencereview/vol2/iss1/19 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in SMU Data Science Review by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. Markas and Wang: Data Science Perspective on Crowdfunding Dare to Venture: Data Science Perspective on Crowdfunding Ruhaab Markas1, Yisha Wang1, John Tseng2 1Master of Science in Data Science, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275 USA 2Independant Consultant Dallas, TX 75275 USA {Rmarkas, YishaW}@smu.edu, [email protected] Abstract. Crowdfunding is an emerging segment of the financial sectors. Entrepreneurs are now able to seek funds from the online community through the use of online crowdfunding platforms. Entrepreneurs seek to understand attributes that play into a successful crowdfunding project (commonly known as campaign). In this paper we seek so understand the field of crowdfunding and various factors that contribute to the success of a campaign. We aim to use traditional modeling techniques to predict successful campaigns for Kickstarter.
    [Show full text]
  • Crowdfunding and Crowdsourcing
    Crowdfunding and Crowdsourcing Drew Tulchin July 13, 2016 Training Objec-ves • Understand possibili-es, limitaons of crowdfunding & crowdsourcing • Explore different types of crowdfunding models; when each appropriate • Gain familiarity with some online plaorms • Learn best prac-ces • Check out case studies Have fun! Please ask ques/ons at any /me About UpSpring www.upspringassociates.com Network of seasoned consultants for impact investment and development to help businesses, organizations, foundations and governments "Do well by doing good" • Certified HubZone Small Business • ‘B Corporation’ since 2010, the first in New Mexico • Honors: 2015, ‘14 & ‘11 “One of the Best for the World” One of 119 companies from 20 countries 2012 Honoree NM Sustainable Business of the Year Drew Tulchin, MBA, Managing Partner 16 years experience building start-ups and growing organizaons. Specializing in the 'triple boOom line,’ focus is market driven business success that generates social, community, and environmental value Consul-ng experience with numerous Nave American Tribes and in 40+ countries from A (Afghanistan) to Z (Zambia) Recent capital raises: Ohkay Owingeh Housing Authority in NM, US MFI from the U.S. Dept. of Treasury, Koolkids in Vietnam, Solar and Energy Loan Fund (SELF) in Florida, and Sea2Table in NY 100+ publicaons and presentaons on these topics 100+ strategic and business plans Efforts >$100 mil in socially mo-vated capital Biz plan winner, Global Social Venture Comp; Prisma Microfinance raised venture $1.2 mil Helped raise $2.7 mil
    [Show full text]
  • Signaling in Equity Crowdfunding
    Signaling in Equity Crowdfunding Gerrit K.C. Ahlers,* Douglas Cumming,† Christina Günther,‡ Denis Schweizer§ ABSTRACT This paper presents an empirical examination of which start-up signals will small investors to commit financial resources in an equity crowdfunding context. We examine the impact of firms’ financial roadmaps (e.g., preplanned exit strategies such as IPOs or acquisitions), external certification (awards, government grants and patents), internal governance (such as board structure), and risk factors (such as amount of equity offered and the presence of disclaimers) on fundraising success. Our data highlight the importance of financial roadmaps and risk factors, as well as internal governance, for successful equity crowdfunding. External certification, by contrast, has little or no impact on success. We also discuss the implications for successful policy design. JEL Classification: G21, G24, L26 Keywords: Entrepreneurial Finance, (Equity) Crowdfunding, Micro Lending, Internet, Signaling * A.T. Kearney GmbH, Charlottenstraße 57, 10117 Berlin, Germany, e-mail: [email protected]. † Professor and Ontario Research Chair, York University - Schulich School of Business, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada, Web: http://ssrn.com/author=75390, Phone: +1-416-736-2100 ext 77942, Fax: +1-416-736-5687, e-mail: [email protected]. ‡ Max Planck Institute of Economics, Kahlaische Str. 10, 07745 Jena, Germany & WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management, Assistant Professor of Industrial and Innovation Economics, Burgplatz 2, 56179 Vallendar, Germany, Phone: +49 3641 686 825, Fax: +49 3641 686 868, e-mail: [email protected]. § WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management, Assistant Professor of Alternative Investments, Burgplatz 2, 56179 Vallendar, Germany, Phone: +49 261 - 6509 724, Fax: +49 261 - 6509 729, e-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • THE VENTURE CROWD Crowdfunding Equity Investment Into Business
    1 THE VENTURE CROWD Crowdfunding equity investment into business THE VENTURE CROWD CROWDFUNDING EQUITY INVESTMENT INTO BUSINESS Liam Collins and Yannis Pierrakis July 2012 2 THE VENTURE CROWD Crowdfunding equity investment into business About Nesta Nesta is the UK’s innovation foundation. We help people and organisations bring great ideas to life. We do this by providing investments and grants and mobilising research, networks and skills. We are an independent charity and our work is enabled by an endowment from the National Lottery. Nesta Operating Company is a registered charity in England and Wales with a company number 7706036 and charity number 1144091. Registered as a charity in Scotland number SC042833. Registered office: 1 Plough Place, London, EC4A 1DE wwww.nesta.org.uk © Nesta 2012. 3 THE VENTURE CROWD Crowdfunding equity investment into business EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Crowdfunding is big business. The idea of financing projects or businesses with small contributions from large numbers of people is catching on in a big way and now accounts for significant amounts of money. In 2011 alone, $1.5 billion was raised through crowdfunding for projects and businesses in need of funds. Not only does the model provide finance but also access to a large number of people who can test and market an idea. Crowdfunding takes a number of different forms, the most successful of which has been the reward–based model where participants receive non–financial rewards in exchange for donating to a project. The model effectively harnesses not only the contributors’ desire for the reward but also the intrinsic or social motivations to back a project.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Supported Businesses, Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs
    Rural Research Report Community Supported Businesses: Grassroots Entrepreneurship Community supported businesses (CSB) are gaining popularity in rural areas for business startup ventures and expansions. This Rural Research Report describes CSBs, mainly based on experiences in rural Vermont, where this entrepreneurial phenomenon is well developed, and discusses issues and opportunities for wider application elsewhere. Community Supported Businesses Explained Winter 2015 Volume 25, Issue 1 CSBs are based on a closer relationship with customers than the simple commer- cial transaction involved in the sales of products or services. As the word supported implies, CSBs not only have a relational, but also a financial connection with their communities, either directly on a personal basis, through an intermediary, or some- times through a public agency. In addition to patronage, finance is typically in the by William Keyser form of advance payments for goods or services, with or without interest, as well as through loans, grants, or, less frequently, equity—frequently in place of or in addition to traditional bank loans. The author is The word community usually implies people in a specific location, but it can equally apply to people who share similar interests. Often, these two types of community overlap. In Vermont villages and small towns, for instance, many people share an interest in eating locally produced or organic food. There is also likely to be two- way support such that money recirculates within the community through businesses buying local products and services. The proximity of financing sources reinforces the sense of community. CSBs are frequently modeled on Community Supported Agriculture (CSA)—a widely known and understood way for farmers to sell their produce to subscribers ahead of production, thus helping to finance the cash flow for their activities early in the season when there is little or no revenue.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Equity Crowdfunding: New Evidence from US and UK Markets Alice
    Equity crowdfunding: New evidence from US and UK markets Alice Rossi [email protected] Department of Management, Information and Production Engineering University of Bergamo Viale Marconi, 5 - 24044 Dalmine (BG), Italy Tom Vanacker [email protected] Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Ghent University Sint-Pietersplein 7, 9000 Gent, Belgium [email protected] University of Exeter Business School University of Exeter Rennes Drive, Exeter, EX4 4ST, United Kingdom Silvio Vismara* [email protected] Department of Management University of Bergamo Via dei Caniana, 2 - 24127Bergamo, Italy Acknowledgements: We thank the editor (Chelsea Liu) and the reviewers of Review of Corporate Finance for their constructive feedback and comments. We further thank the participants and the discussant (Feng Zhan) at the Boca Corporate Finance and Governance Conference for their valuable comments. Alice Rossi acknowledges support from Ghent University in the form of a visiting period as incoming PhD student at the Faculty of Economics and Business Administration. * Contact author: Silvio Vismara, Department of Management, University of Bergamo, Italy; via dei Caniana 2, 24127 Bergamo, Italy. Ph. +39.035.2052352. Email: [email protected]. 1 Equity crowdfunding: New evidence from US and UK markets Abstract This paper offers insights into 3,576 initial equity crowdfunding offerings in the UK and US markets from 2012 to 2019. We investigate the factors influencing three outcomes: the success of the offering, the fundraising target, and matching between entrepreneurial ventures and crowdfunding platforms. In all markets, higher equity retention by original entrepreneurs positively affects the chances of success of the offerings and amount of capital raised.
    [Show full text]