Board Members Ron Roberts, Chair Chair, County of San Diego Terry Sinnott, First Vice Chair Deputy Mayor, Del Mar Matt Hall Mayor, Carlsbad Mary Salas Mayor, Chula Vista BOARD OF DIRECTORS Carrie Downey Councilmember, Coronado Bill Wells AGENDA Mayor, El Cajon Lisa Shaffer Deputy Mayor, Encinitas Friday, November 18, 2016 Sam Abed 9 a.m. to 12 noon Mayor, Escondido Serge Dedina SANDAG Board Room Mayor, Imperial Beach 401 B Street, 7th Floor Kristine Alessio Councilmember, La Mesa San Diego Mary Teresa Sessom Mayor, Lemon Grove Ron Morrison Mayor, National City Jim Wood AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS Mayor, Oceanside Steve Vaus Mayor, Poway • ELECTION OF 2017 SANDAG BOARD OFFICERS Kevin Faulconer Mayor, City of San Diego • PROPOSED FY 2017 PROGRAM BUDGET Todd Gloria Councilmember, City of San Diego AMENDMENT: INTERSTATE 5/VOIGT DRIVE Jack Dale IMPROVEMENTS Vice Mayor, Santee Jim Desmond Mayor, San Marcos • TransNet ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION Lesa Heebner PROGRAM: LAND MANAGEMENT GRANT Councilmember, Solana Beach PROGRAM: RECOMMENDED PROJECT AWARDS Judy Ritter Mayor, Vista FOR EIGHTH CYCLE OF GRANT FUNDING Dianne Jacob Vice Chair, County of San Diego PLEASE SILENCE ALL ELECTRONIC DEVICES DURING THE MEETING Advisory Members Hon. John Renison YOU CAN LISTEN TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Supervisor, District 1 Imperial County MEETING BY VISITING OUR WEBSITE AT SANDAG.ORG Malcolm Dougherty, Director California Department MESSAGE FROM THE CLERK of Transportation In compliance with Government Code §54952.3, the Clerk hereby announces that the compensation Harry Mathis, Chair Metropolitan Transit System for legislative body members attending the following simultaneous or serial meetings is: Executive Mark Packard, Chair Committee (EC) $100, Board of Directors (BOD) $150, and Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) North County Transit District $100. Compensation rates for the EC and BOD are set pursuant to the SANDAG Bylaws and the Joe Stuyvesant, Navy Region Southwest compensation rate for the RTC is set pursuant to state law. Executive Director U.S. Department of Defense MISSION STATEMENT Garry Bonelli, Commissioner San Diego Unified Port District The 18 cities and county government are SANDAG serving as the forum for regional decision-making. Mark Muir, Chair SANDAG builds consensus, makes strategic plans, obtains and allocates resources, plans, engineers, San Diego County Water Authority and builds public transit, and provides information on a broad range of topics pertinent to the Cody Martinez, Chairman region's quality of life. Southern California Tribal Chairmen’s Association San Diego Association of Governments ⋅ 401 B Street, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92101-4231 Hon. Marcela Celorio Consul General of Mexico (619) 699-1900 ⋅ Fax (619) 699-1905 ⋅ sandag.org Gary L. Gallegos Executive Director, SANDAG

Welcome to SANDAG. Members of the public may speak to the Board of Directors on any item at the time the Board is considering the item. Please complete a Speaker’s Slip, which is located in the rear of the room, and then present the slip to the Clerk of the Board seated at the front table. Members of the public may address the Board on any issue under the agenda item entitled Public Comments/Communications/Member Comments. Public speakers are limited to three minutes or less per person. The Board of Directors may take action on any item appearing on the agenda.

Public comments regarding the agenda can be sent to SANDAG via [email protected]. Please include the agenda item, your name, and your organization. Email comments should be received no later than 12 noon, two working days prior to the Board of Directors meeting. Any handouts, presentations, or other materials from the public intended for distribution at the Board of Directors meeting should be received by the Clerk of the Board no later than 12 noon, two working days prior to the meeting.

In order to keep the public informed in an efficient manner and facilitate public participation, SANDAG also provides access to all agenda and meeting materials online at www.sandag.org/meetings. Additionally, interested persons can sign up for e-notifications via our e-distribution list at either the SANDAG website or by sending an email request to [email protected].

SANDAG operates its programs without regard to race, color, and national origin in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. SANDAG has developed procedures for investigating and tracking Title VI complaints and the procedures for filing a complaint are available to the public upon request. Questions concerning SANDAG nondiscrimination obligations or complaint procedures should be directed to SANDAG General Counsel, John Kirk, at (619) 699-1997 or [email protected]. Any person who believes himself or herself or any specific class of persons to be subjected to discrimination prohibited by Title VI also may file a written complaint with the Federal Transit Administration.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), SANDAG will accommodate persons who require assistance in order to participate in SANDAG meetings. If such assistance is required, please contact SANDAG at (619) 699-1900 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. To request this document or related reports in an alternative format, please call (619) 699-1900, (619) 699-1904 (TTY), or fax (619) 699-1905.

SANDAG agenda materials can be made available in alternative languages. To make a request call (619) 699-1900 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Los materiales de la agenda de SANDAG están disponibles en otros idiomas. Para hacer una solicitud, llame al (619) 699-1900 al menos 72 horas antes de la reunión. 如有需要, 我们可以把SANDAG议程材料翻译成其他語言.

请在会议前至少 72 小时打电话 (619) 699-1900 提出请求.

SANDAG offices are accessible by public transit. Phone 511 or see 511sd.com for route information. Bicycle parking is available in the parking garage of the SANDAG offices.

2 Rev. 102116 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Friday, November 18, 2016

ITEM NO. RECOMMENDATION +1. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES APPROVE

The Board of Directors is asked to review and approve the minutes from its October 28, 2016, Board Business Meeting.

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS/COMMUNICATIONS/MEMBER COMMENTS

Public comments under this agenda item will be limited to five public speakers. Members of the public shall have the opportunity to address the Board on any issue within the jurisdiction of SANDAG that is not on this agenda. Other public comments will be heard during the items under the heading “Reports.” Anyone desiring to speak shall reserve time by completing a “Request to Speak” form and giving it to the Clerk of the Board prior to speaking. Public speakers should notify the Clerk of the Board if they have a handout for distribution to Board members. Public speakers are limited to three minutes or less per person. Board members also may provide information and announcements under this agenda item.

+3. ACTIONS FROM POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEES APPROVE (Victoria Stackwick)

This item summarizes the actions taken by the Policy Advisory Committees since the last Board Business Meeting. The Board of Directors is asked to ratify these actions.

CONSENT

+4. REVISED 2017 BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND POLICY ADVISORY APPROVE COMMITTEE ANNUAL MEETING CALENDAR (Victoria Stackwick)*

The Board of Directors is asked to approve the revised calendar of meetings of the Board and Policy Advisory Committees for the upcoming year.

+5. BAYSHORE BIKEWAY SEGMENT 8B: FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE ADOPT DECLARATION (Omar Atayee)

The Bayshore Bikeway Segment 8B Project will provide a 0.4-mile extension of the Bayshore Bikeway along Bay Boulevard south from Palomar Street in the City of San Diego. The Board of Directors is asked to adopt the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project. +6. OVERVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS IN THE FINANCIAL MARKETS AND INFORMATION QUARTERLY FINANCE REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 (Andre Douzdjian, Lisa Kondrat-Dauphin, and Ray Major)*

This quarterly report provides various finance-related items to the Board of Directors, including: (1) a quarterly report of investments, including all money under the direction or care of SANDAG; (2) an update on the SANDAG debt portfolio; and (3) information about the latest developments in the financial markets, the economy, and sales tax revenues.

+7. QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT ON TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS - JULY INFORMATION THROUGH SEPTEMBER 2016 (Asitha Seneviratne)*

This quarterly report summarizes the current status of major transit, highway, arterial, traffic management, and Transportation Demand Management projects in the SANDAG five-year Regional Transportation Improvement Program for the period July through September 2016.

+8. REPORT ON MEETINGS AND EVENTS ATTENDED ON BEHALF OF INFORMATION SANDAG (Victoria Stackwick)

Board members will provide brief reports orally or in writing on external meetings and events attended on behalf of SANDAG since the last Board of Directors Business meeting.

+9. REPORT SUMMARIZING DELEGATED ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE INFORMATION EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (André Douzdjian)*

In accordance with various SANDAG Board Policies, this report summarizes certain delegated actions taken by the Executive Director since the last Board of Directors Business meeting.

CHAIR’S REPORT

+10. ELECTION OF 2017 SANDAG BOARD OFFICERS (San Diego APPROVE Councilmember Todd Gloria; Nominating Committee Chair)*

The Nominating Committee recommends the attached slate of candidates for SANDAG Chair, First Vice Chair, and Second Vice Chair for calendar year 2017. The Board of Directors is asked to elect SANDAG Board Officers for the upcoming year.

2 REPORTS

+11. PROPOSED FY 2017 PROGRAM BUDGET AMENDMENT: OVERHEAD APPROVE CONTACT SYSTEM INSULATOR AND CATCH CABLE REPLACEMENT PROJECT (San Diego Councilmember Todd Gloria, Transportation Committee Chair; Dale Neuzil)

The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors accept $2.95 million from Metropolitan Transit System to fully fund the construction of the Overhead Contact System Insulator and Catch Cable Replacement Project (Capital Improvement Program Project No. 1129200) and amend the FY 2017 Program Budget accordingly.

+12. PROPOSED FY 2017 PROGRAM BUDGET AMENDMENT: APPROVE INTERSTATE 5/VOIGT DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS (San Diego Councilmember Todd Gloria, Transportation Committee Chair; Allan Kosup, Caltrans Corridor Director)

The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors approve an amendment to the FY 2017 Program Budget to add $5.75 million in State Highway Operation and Protection Program funding to the Interstate 5 (I-5)/ Voigt Drive Improvement Project (Capital Improvement Program Project No. 1200508) for the construction of a half-mile auxiliary lane on southbound I-5 between Genesee Avenue and La Jolla Village Drive.

+13. TransNet ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION PROGRAM: LAND APPROVE MANAGEMENT GRANT PROGRAM: RECOMMENDED PROJECT AWARDS FOR EIGHTH CYCLE OF GRANT FUNDING (Solana Beach Councilmember Lesa Heebner, Regional Planning Committee Chair; Sarah Pierce)*

The Regional Planning and Transportation Committees recommend that the Board of Directors award funding for the Eighth Cycle of the TransNet Environmental Mitigation Program Land Management Grants.

+14. REGIONAL SHORELINE MONITORING PROGRAM (Solana Beach APPROVE Councilmember Lesa Heebner, Regional Planning Committee Chair; Sarah Pierce)

The Regional Planning Committee recommends that the Board of Directors continue the Regional Shoreline Monitoring Program for an additional five years based on the FY 2018 Estimated Program Cost. The Board of Directors also is asked to authorize the Executive Director to execute all documents necessary to implement the Program.

3 +15. CLOSED SESSION: CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 AND CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (Chip Willett, Bender Rosenthal; Sandra Brower, Higgs Fletcher & Mack; John Haggerty, Ryan Kohut)

The Board of Directors will be briefed by the SANDAG real property negotiation team on the status of negotiations with Protea Properties, LLC, regarding the price and terms of payment of a potential settlement to acquire real property at 2565 Clairemont Drive, San Diego, CA 92117 (Assessor Parcel No. 430-030-59-00) for use by SANDAG to construct the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project. The Board also will be briefed on the status of litigation regarding acquisition of the subject parcel in the matter of SANDAG v. SA Marina, LLC et al. (San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2016-00017083-CU-EI-CTL).

+16. CLOSED SESSION: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(d)(2) – ONE POTENTIAL CASE (John Kirk)

The Board of Directors will be briefed on a claim filed against SANDAG by Skanska USA Civil West California District Inc. alleging damages related to the Sorrento to Miramar Double Tracking Realignment Project.

17. CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS

If the five speaker limit for public comments was exceeded at the beginning of this agenda, other public comments will be taken at this time. Subjects of previous agenda items may not again be addressed under public comment.

18. UPCOMING MEETINGS INFORMATION

The next Board Policy meeting is scheduled for Friday, December 2, 2016, at 10 a.m. The next Board Business meeting is scheduled for Friday, December 16, 2016, at 9 a.m. (Please note, these meetings are scheduled for the first and third Fridays, respectively, due to the holiday schedule.)

19. ADJOURNMENT

+ next to an agenda item indicates an attachment * next to an agenda item indicates that the Board of Directors also is acting as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission for that item

4

AGENDA ITEM NO. 16-11-1 BOARD OF DIRECTORS NOVEMBER 18, 2016 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISCUSSION AND ACTIONS

OCTOBER 28, 2016

Chair Ron Roberts (Chair, County of San Diego) called the meeting of the SANDAG Board of Directors to order at 9:06 a.m.

1. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES

Action: Upon a motion by Mayor Sam Abed (Escondido), and a second by Mayor Jim Desmond (San Marcos), the Board of Directors approved the minutes from the September 9, 2016, Board Policy meeting, and the September 23, 2016, Board Business meeting. Yes – Chair Roberts, Vice Chair Terry Sinnott (Del Mar), Mayor Matt Hall (Carlsbad), Mayor Mary Salas (Chula Vista), Councilmember Michael Woiwode (Coronado), Deputy Mayor Lisa Shaffer (Encinitas), Mayor Abed, Mayor Serge Dedina (Imperial Beach), Councilmember Kristine Alessio (La Mesa), Deputy Mayor Chuck Lowery (Oceanside), Mayor Steve Vaus (Poway), Councilmember Todd Gloria (City of San Diego A), Councilmember Lorie Zapf (City of San Diego B), Mayor Desmond, Vice Mayor Jack Dale (Santee), Councilmember Lesa Heebner (Solana Beach), and Mayor Judy Ritter (Vista) (weighted vote, 98.95%). No – None (weighted vote, 0%). Abstain – Mayor Mary Sessom (Lemon Grove) (weighted vote, 1.05%). Absent – County of San Diego B, El Cajon, and National City.

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS/COMMUNICATIONS/MEMBER COMMENTS

The following members of the public submitted written comments and ceded their time to Michael Pallamary and John Coffey: Maureen Pallamary; Jason Satterly; Jensen Smith; Amanda Adams and John Smith.

Mr. Pallamary, representing John Smith Earthworks, and Mr. Coffey, gave a presentation and spoke about concerns related to drainage issues along the Mid-Coast Corridor.

Chair Roberts introduced the Honorable Marcela Celorio, the new Consul General of Mexico in San Diego.

Chair Roberts recognized outgoing Advisory member for the Southern California Tribal Chairmen’s Association, Honorable Allen Lawson, Chairman of the San Pasqual Band of Diegueno Indians.

3. ACTIONS FROM POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEES (APPROVE)

This report summarized the actions taken by the Policy Advisory Committees since the last Board Business Meeting. The Board of Directors was asked to ratify these actions.

Action: Upon a motion by Councilmember Alessio, and a second by Councilmember Woiwode, the Board of Directors approved Item No. 3. Yes – Chair Roberts, Vice Chair Sinnott, Mayor Hall, Mayor Salas, Councilmember Woiwode, Deputy Mayor Shaffer, Mayor Abed, Mayor Dedina, Councilmember Alessio, Mayor Sessom, Mayor Ron Morrison (National City), Deputy Mayor Lowery, Mayor Vaus, Councilmember Gloria, Councilmember Zapf, Mayor Desmond, Vice Mayor Dale, Councilmember Heebner, and Mayor Ritter (weighted vote, 100%). No – None (weighted vote, 0%). Abstain – None (weighted vote, 0%). Absent – County of San Diego B and El Cajon.

CONSENT

4. APPROVAL OF REVISED SOLICITATION AND CONTRACT AWARDS (APPROVE)

The Board of Directors was asked to review and approve the proposed contract awards and revised solicitation.

5. 2017 BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE ANNUAL MEETING CALENDAR (APPROVE)

The Board of Directors was asked to approve the calendar of meetings of the Board and Policy Advisory Committees for the upcoming year.

6. REPORT ON MEETINGS AND EVENTS ATTENDED ON BEHALF OF SANDAG (INFORMATION)

Board members provided brief reports orally or in writing on external meetings and events attended on behalf of SANDAG since the last Board Business meeting.

7. REPORT SUMMARIZING DELEGATED ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (INFORMATION)

In accordance with various SANDAG Board Policies, this report summarized certain delegated actions taken by the Executive Director since the last Board Business meeting.

Action: Upon a motion by Mayor Abed, and a second by Mayor Ritter, the Board of Directors approved Consent Items No. 4 through 7. Yes – Chair Roberts, Vice Chair Sinnott, Mayor Hall, Mayor Salas, Councilmember Woiwode, Deputy Mayor Shaffer, Mayor Abed, Mayor Dedina, Councilmember Alessio, Mayor Sessom, Mayor Morrison, Deputy Mayor Lowery, Mayor Vaus, Councilmember Gloria, Councilmember Zapf, Mayor Desmond, Vice Mayor Dale, Councilmember Heebner, and Mayor Ritter. No – None. Abstain – None. Absent – County of San Diego B and El Cajon.

REPORTS

8. SAN DIEGO REGIONAL MILITARY WORKING GROUP STATUS REPORT (INFORMATION)

Chair Roberts introduced the item.

Councilmember Woiwode, Regional Military Working Group Chair, provided an update on the work accomplished to date and future tasks.

Action: This item was presented for information.

2 9. TransNet INDEPENDENT TAXPAYER OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE 2016 ANNUAL REPORT (INFORMATION)

Stewart Halpern, TransNet Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee (ITOC) Chair, provided the 2016 ITOC Annual Report, including the results of the fiscal and compliance audits.

Action: This item was presented for information.

10. CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS

Chair Roberts invited members of the Board of Directors to attend the Live Well San Diego event on Thursday, November 3, 2016, at 11:30 a.m.

11. UPCOMING MEETINGS

The Board Policy meeting scheduled for Friday, November 4, 2016, has been cancelled. The next Board Business meeting is scheduled for Friday, November 18, 2016, at 9 a.m. Please note, this meeting is scheduled for the third Friday of the month due to the holiday schedule.

12. ADJOURNMENT

Chair Roberts adjourned the meeting at 9:43 a.m.

3 Meeting Start Time: 9:06 a.m. Meeting Adjourned Time: 9:43 a.m.

ATTENDANCE SANDAG BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ MEETING OCTOBER 28, 2016

ATTEND JURISDICTION NAME OPEN SESSION

City of Carlsbad Matt Hall (Primary) Yes

City of Chula Vista Mary Salas (Primary) Yes

City of Coronado Michael Woiwode (1st Alt.) Yes

City of Del Mar Terry Sinnott, First Vice Chair (Primary) Yes

City of El Cajon Bill Wells (Primary) No

City of Encinitas Lisa Shaffer (Primary) Yes

City of Escondido Sam Abed (Primary) Yes

City of Imperial Beach Serge Dedina (Primary) Yes

City of La Mesa Kristine Alessio (Primary) Yes

City of Lemon Grove Mary Sessom (Primary) Yes

City of National City Ron Morrison (Primary) Yes

City of Oceanside Chuck Lowery (2nd. Alt.) Yes

City of Poway Steve Vaus (Primary) Yes

City of San Diego – B Lorie Zapf (1st Alt.) Yes

City of San Diego – A Todd Gloria (Primary) Yes

City of San Marcos Jim Desmond (Primary) Yes

City of Santee Jack Dale (Primary) Yes

City of Solana Beach Lesa Heebner (Primary) Yes

City of Vista Judy Ritter (Primary) Yes

County of San Diego – B Dianne Jacob (Primary, Seat B) No

County of San Diego - A Ron Roberts, Chair (Primary, Seat A) Yes

Caltrans Laurie Berman (1st. Alt.) Yes

MTS Harry Mathis (Primary) No

NCTD Mark Packard (Primary) Yes

Imperial County Sup. John Renison (Primary) No

US Dept. of Defense Joe Stuyvesant (Primary) Yes

SD Unified Port District Garry Bonelli (Primary) Yes SD County Water Authority Mark Muir (Primary) Yes

Mexico Marcela Celorio (Primary) Yes Southern California Tribal Allen Lawson (Primary) Yes Chairmen’s Association

4 AGENDA ITEM NO. 16-11-3 BOARD OF DIRECTORS NOVEMBER 18, 2016 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

ACTIONS FROM POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEES File Number 8000100

Introduction Recommendation

The following actions were taken by the Policy Advisory The Board of Directors is asked to ratify Committees since the last Board of Directors meeting. the actions of the Policy Advisory Committees. BORDERS COMMITTEE MEETING (October 28, 2016)

The Borders Committee did not take any actions or make any recommendations at this meeting.

TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING (November 4, 2016)

The Transportation Committee took the following actions and recommended the following approvals:

• Approved an amendment to the FY 2017 Program Budget to add $300,000 to the Airport Connection Project.

• Recommended that the Board of Directors award funding for the Eighth Cycle of the TransNet Environmental Mitigation Program Land Management Grants.

• Recommended that the Board of Directors approve an amendment to the FY 2017 Program Budget to add $5.75 million in State Highway Operation and Protection Program funding to the Interstate 5 (I-5)/Voigt Drive Improvement Project for the construction of a half-mile auxiliary lane on southbound I-5 between Genesee Avenue and La Jolla Village Drive.

• Recommended that the Board of Directors accept $2.95 million from Metropolitan Transit System to fully fund the construction of the Overhead Contact System Insulator and Catch Cable Replacement Project (Capital Improvement Program Project No. 1129200) and amend the FY 2017 Program Budget accordingly.

REGIONAL PLANNING COMMITTEE (November 4, 2016)

The Regional Planning Committee recommended the following approval:

• Recommended that the Board of Directors award funding for the Eighth Cycle of the TransNet Environmental Mitigation Program Land Management Grants.

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING (November 4, 2016)

The Executive Committee took the following actions:

• Approved the draft agenda for the November 18, 2016, Board Business meeting as amended, and the possible cancellation of the December 2, 2016, Board Policy meeting, if no agenda items are identified.

• Approved amendments to the FY 2017 Program Budget to create new Overall Work Program Project Nos. 33217 and 33309; accepted $288,000 and $195,949, respectively, in Caltrans/Federal Highway Administration Strategic Partnership grant awards; and authorized $120,987 in matching Transportation Development Act funds in order to develop the Inter-Regional Park and Ride Strategy and the Transportation Demand Management and Transportation System Management Traffic Impact Analysis Toolbox.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Key Staff Contact: Victoria Stackwick, (619) 699-6926, [email protected]

2 Agenda Item No. 4, Board of Directors, November 18, 2016 2017 CALENDAR OF MEETINGS OF THE SANDAG BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEES

Transportation Board of Directors – Board of Directors – Regional Planning Public Safety Committee Executive Committee Borders Committee Policy or Business Business Committee Committee (Normally first and (Normally second Friday, (Normally fourth Friday, (Normally second Friday, (Normally fourth Friday, (Normally first Friday, (Normally third Friday, third Fridays, 9 to 10 a.m.) 12:30 to 2:30 p.m.) 10 a.m. to 12 noon) 9 a.m. to 12 noon) 12 noon to 2 p.m.) 1 to 3 p.m.) 9 a.m. to 12 noon)

January 6, 2017 January 13, 2017 January 27, 2017 January 6, 2017 January 13, 2017 January 20, 2017 January 27, 2017 January 20, 2017

February 8-10, 2017: February 3, 2017 February 10, 2017: February 24, 2017 February 3, 2017 February 17, 2017 February 24, 2017 Board Retreat February 17, 2017 Held at Board Retreat

March 3, 2017 March 10, 2017 March 24, 2017 March 3, 2017 March 10, 2017 March 17, 2017 March 24, 2017 March 17, 2017

April 7, 2017 April 14, 2017 April 28, 2017 April 7, 2017 April 14, 2017 April 21, 2017 April 28, 2017 April 21, 2017

May 5, 2017 May 12, 2017 May 26, 2017 May 5, 2017 May 12, 2017 May 19, 2017 May 26, 2017 May 19, 2017

June 2, 2017 June 9, 2017 June 23, 2017 June 2, 2017 June 9, 2017 June 16, 2017 June 23, 2017 June 16, 2017

July 7, 2017 July 14, 2017 July 28, 2017 July 7, 2017 July 14, 2017 July 21, 2017 July 28, 2017 July 21, 2017

August 4, 2017 August 11, 2017 August 25, 2017 August 4, 2017 August 11, 2017 August 18, 2017 August 25, 2017 August 18, 2017

September 1, 2017 September 8, 2017 September 22, 2017 September 1, 2017 September 8, 2017 September 15, 2017 September 22, 2017 September 15, 2017

October 6, 2017 October 13, 2017 October 27, 2017 October 6, 2017 October 13, 2017 October 20, 2017 October 27, 2017 October 20, 2017

November 310, 2017 November 3, 2017 November 3, 2017 November 10, 2017 November 17, 2017 11 a.m. – 1 p.m. November 17, 2017 9 – 10 a.m. November 3, 2017 8 – 9 a.m. (Second FridayNo (Third Friday due to (Only one meeting on (Third Friday due to (First Friday due to 1:15 – 3 p.m. (First Friday due to meeting due to holiday schedule) second Friday due to holiday schedule) holiday schedule) holiday schedule) holiday schedule) holiday schedule) December 8, 2017 December 1, 2017 December 15, 2017 December 1, 2017 December 8, 2017 (Only one meeting on (To be scheduled only if (First Friday due to (Third Friday due to December 1, 2017 (First Friday due to (Second Friday due second Friday due to needed) holiday schedule) holiday schedule) holiday schedule) to holiday schedule) holiday schedule)

Changes to normal meeting schedule shown in bold. BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA ITEM NO. 16-11-5 NOVEMBER 18, 2016 ACTION REQUESTED – ADOPT

BAYSHORE BIKEWAY SEGMENT 8B PROJECT: File Number 1129900 FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

Introduction Recommendation SANDAG has completed preliminary engineering and the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for The Board of Directors is asked to adopt the Bayshore Bikeway Segment 8B Project (Project). the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration The MND satisfies the requirements of the California (Attachment 3) and Mitigation Monitoring Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Adoption of the and Reporting Program for the Bayshore MND and related Mitigation Monitoring and Bikeway Segment 8B Project (Appendix G Reporting Program will allow the Project to move of Attachment 3). forward with final design and construction.

Discussion

Background

The Bayshore Bikeway is a regional corridor that will eventually extend 24 miles around San Diego Bay, providing a vital and scenic connection to major bayfront employers, as well as tourist and recreational destinations. Approximately 15 miles of the bikeway has been built to date.

These projects are part of the SANDAG Regional Bike Plan Early Action Program (Bike EAP), a ten-year effort to expand the regional bike network and complete high-priority bikeway projects approved in Riding to 2050: The San Diego Regional Bike Plan (Bike Plan) (Attachment 1). The Bike Plan and Bike EAP are part of the region’s efforts to make riding a bike a viable, attractive choice for everyday trips.

Project Overview

The Project is described in the Bayshore Bikeway Plan (2006) and reviewed again in a feasibility study performed in 2010. It consists of approximately 0.4 miles of new Class 1 bikeway in the cities of San Diego and Chula Vista between Palomar Street and Ada Avenue along Bay Boulevard (Attachment 2). The Project extends the existing Bayshore Bikeway (Segment 8A), which currently terminates at Palomar Street. The bikeway alignment will be designed over an existing drainage ditch and just east of an existing railroad. The improvements will include surface improvements, drainage structures, retaining walls, bike lane striping, minor grading, fencing, relocation of existing utilities, lighting, and other improvements as required by the cities.

The Project completes the northern portion of Segment 8, which will eventually extend south to the existing Bayshore Bikeway at Main Street. The southern portion will be developed pending the outcome of a proposed private development in the area that will determine the appropriate alignment for that portion of the bikeway.

California Environmental Quality Act Compliance

The Final MND consists of: (1) the Draft MND, including all revisions; (2) all appendices to the Draft MND; (3) comments received on the Draft MND; and (4) responses to comments. The Draft MND was released for a 30-day public comment period between July 27, 2016, and August 26, 2016. Two comments were received on the Draft MND from two individuals. Written responses to the comments are provided in Appendix H of the Final MND.

The Final MND incorporates the minor revisions made to the Draft MND as a result of comments received during the public review period as well as other minor clarifications and revisions. All changes to the Draft MND are shown in strikeout underline format in the Final MND. Additionally, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and CEQA Guideline 15097 to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures identified in the MND during project construction. The Final MND concludes that there would be no significant environmental impacts associated with construction or operation of the proposed bike path with the implementation of mitigation measures related to biological resources, cultural resources, and utilities and service systems. None of the comments received or other changes to the Draft MND change the overall conclusions. The Project is anticipated to have positive environmental effects with respect to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and transportation/traffic.

The technical appendices and related documents for the Final MND are available online at http://www.keepsandiegomoving.com/RegionalBikeProjects/Bayshore_Bikeway_notices.aspx

Next Steps

Pending action by the Board of Directors, final design of the Bayshore Bikeway Segment 8B would move forward. The Project is expected to be ready to advertise for construction in May 2017, with construction expected to begin in December 2017, and the facility open to the public in July 2018.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachments: 1. Regional Map: San Diego Regional Bike Plan EAP 2. Bayshore Bikeway Segment 8B Project Location 3. Bayshore Bikeway Segment 8B Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration: Appendices G and H – Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program*

Key Staff Contact: Omar Atayee, (619) 595-5319, [email protected]

*Please note: The full document in electronic format can be downloaded at: http://www.keepsandiegomoving.com/RegionalBikeProjects/Bayshore_Bikeway_notices.aspx

Hard copies of the report are available by contacting the Public Information Office at (619) 699-1950.

2 Attachment 1 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL BIKE PLAN Early Action Program

Oceanside Inland Vista Rail Trail

78 San Marcos Escondido 15 Carlsbad Coastal Rail Trail

Encinitas San Diego County

5

Solana Beach Poway

Del Mar 56

San Diego River Trail San Diego Santee P a c 52 i f i c 125

O 67 c e

a El Cajon

n 163

8 La Mesa Lemon 94 Grove

Coronado National 805 City

54 Regional Bike Network Bayshore High Priority Projects Bikeway 125 Class I Bikeway Projects Chula Vista N Class I Bikeways (Built Sections) W E 5 Other Regional Corridors Other Regional Corridors S Imperial 905 (Built Sections) 01 2 3 4 Beach San Diego UNITED STATES Miles MEXICO 3170 3/15

GObyBIKEsd.com #GObyBIKEsd 3 Attachment 2 HARBOR

DRIVE VESTA ST

2015 - 32nd Street to BAYSHORENATIONAL CITY BLVD. BIKEWAY Vesta Street National City CIVIC CENTER DR.

HOOVER ST. 2016 - Vesta Street to National City Marina

TIDELANDS AVE. 54

5TH AVENUE

C S T.

NATIONAL CITY MARINA BROADWAY San Diego Bay

32ND ST.

Sweetwater Channel E STREET

F STREET 75

BAY BLVD.

H STREET Pending Chula Vista MARINA PARKWAY Bayfront Redevelopment J STREETChula Vista CHULA VISTA MARINA

Pacific Ocean

SD&AE RAILROAD R/W

SILVER STRAND STATE BEACH PALOMAR STREET

STELLA AVE.

MAIN STREET

SATURN BLVD.

BAYSHORE BIKEWAY 75 BIKE PATH ON-STREET LANE/ROUTE 75 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS PALM AVE. PLANNED PROJECTS Segment 8B

0 3,000 6,000

FEET March 2015 Imperial Beach 2533 3/15

GObyBIKEsd.com #GObyBIKEsd 4 Attachment 3

Appendix G

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

5

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; California Public Resources Code §21081.6) requires public agencies to adopt a monitoring and reporting program for the revisions which it has required in the project and the measures it has imposed to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects. In order to ensure implementation of the mitigation measures and design features identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), SANDAG shall adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). This MMRP has been prepared in accordance with the proposed Bayshore Bikeway – Segment 8B Project, the environmental effects of which have been evaluated in an MND prepared in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines.

This MMRP identifies the mitigation measures and design features that shall be implemented by SANDAG as the responsible party and the timing of implementation. SANDAG may delegate the reporting or monitoring responsibilities identified below to another entity that accepts the delegation (such as a construction contractor). However, until the mitigation measures and design features included in the MMRP have been completed, SANDAG remains responsible for ensuring that implementation occurs in accordance with the adopted program (CEQA Guidelines §15097[a]).

Bayshore Bikeway – Segment 8B Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Page 1 6

Responsible Notes Design Feature or Mitigation Measure Timing Completed Initials Party (Optional) Biological Resources BIO-1 Temporary impacts to 0.22 acre of coastal brackish marsh shall Prior to construction SANDAG be mitigated at a 1:1 ratio. Mitigation for temporary impact areas would occur either through restoration of impacted areas to their pre-impact  ____ contours and conditions, through habitat mitigation, or as determined through consultation with the resource agencies.* BIO-2 Permanent impacts to 0.07 acre of coastal brackish marsh shall Prior to construction SANDAG be mitigated at a 2:1 ratio. Mitigation for permanent impacts would occur through on- and/or off-site restoration, enhancement, and/or establishment/re-establishment with an establishment/ re-establishment  ____ ratio of 1:1, or purchase of credits at an approved mitigation bank. Final mitigation requirements for impacts to coastal brackish marsh would be determined in consultation with the resource agencies.* BIO-3 Temporary impacts to 0.003 acre of open water shall be Prior to construction SANDAG mitigated at a 1:1 ratio. Mitigation for temporary impact areas would occur either through restoration of impacted areas to their pre-impact  ____ contours and conditions, through habitat mitigation, or as determined through consultation with the resource agencies. BIO-4 Permanent impacts to 0.002 acre of open water shall be Prior to construction SANDAG mitigated at a 2:1 ratio. Mitigation for permanent impacts would occur through on- and/or off-site restoration, enhancement, and/or establishment/re-establishment with an establishment/ re-establishment  ____ ratio of 1:1, or purchase of credits at an approved mitigation bank. Final mitigation requirements for impacts to open water would be determined in consultation with the resource agencies. BIO-5 Permanent impacts to 0.03 acre of streambed shall be mitigated Prior to construction SANDAG at a 1:1 ratio. Mitigation for permanent impacts would occur through on- and/or off-site restoration, enhancement, and/or establishment/re- establishment with an establishment/ re-establishment ratio of 1:1, or  ____ purchase of credits at an approved mitigation bank. Final mitigation requirements for impacts to open water would be determined in consultation with the resource agencies.

*BIO-1 and BIO-2 would also mitigate impacts resulting from storm drain facilities to be implemented as part of the project as identified in Section 7.17, Utilities and Service Systems, of the IS/MND.

Bayshore Bikeway – Segment 8B Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Page 2 7

Responsible Notes Design Feature or Mitigation Measure Timing Completed Initials Party (Optional) Biological Resources (cont.) BIO-6 If construction occurs between February 15 and September 15, a Prior to construction/ SANDAG qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-construction survey to determine During construction the presence or absence of nesting birds within the project site or adjacent habitat. The pre-construction survey must be conducted within 10 calendar days prior to the start of construction, and the results must be submitted to SANDAG for review and approval prior to initiating any  ____ construction activities. If any active nests are detected, the area will be flagged and mapped on construction plans along with a 300-foot buffer, or as recommended by the qualified biologist. The buffer area(s) established by the qualified biologist shall be avoided until the nesting cycle is complete or it is determined that the nest has failed. Cultural Resources CUL-1 Prior to construction, temporary construction fencing shall be Prior to construction/ SANDAG installed along the western edge of the APE, which is identified as six During construction feet west of the eastern ROW line of APN 621-010-02. Fencing shall  ____ remain in place during all construction activities for the duration of the project construction period.

Bayshore Bikeway – Segment 8B Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Page 3 8

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Bayshore Bikeway – Segment 8B Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Page 4 9 Appendix H

RESPONSES TO COMMENTS

10 COMMENTS RESPONSES

A1 This comment letter confi rms receipt and distribution of the Draft IS/ MND and documents project compliance with State Clearinghouse review requirements for the Draft IS/MND pursuant to CEQA. No A1 further response is required.

RTC-1 11 COMMENTS RESPONSES

RTC-2 12 COMMENTS RESPONSES

SOUTH BAY SALT WORKS

August 26, 2016

Lauren Esposito, Environmental Planner SANDAG 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101 [email protected]

Re: Bayshore Bikeway – Segment 8B Proect – SBSW comments on Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration

Dear Lauren Esposito,

South Bay Salt Works has reviewed the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, which we B1 This comment provides introductory statements and identifi es the are now supplying our written comments regarding. The proposed alignment is adjacent to South Bay topics discussed in detail within the letter. Responses to specifi c issues Salt Works, our stockpiles, our warehouse/processing fa cility and our entrances to the property, as well associated with these topics are provided in responses B2 through B6. B1 as loading stations of processed salt. Our comments focus on two primary areas. First is the need to No further response is required. provide continued access to our prop erty and loading stations, both during and after construction. The second area is regarding changes to drainage from the site both during construction and after construction.

Access B2 Both of the noted access points will remain open and accessible for trucks We have loading stations for different types of proce ssed salt at both the north and south ends of our during normal operating business hours of the South Bay Salt Works processing building, where bulk trucks are loaded on a daily basis. Many of these trucks are sets of throughout the duration of the construction period for the bike path. doubles, a tractor pulling a pair of trailers, which cannot be backed up because they will jackknife when The construction contractor will be required by contract specifi cations backing up is attempted. As a consequence, these sets of doubles must enter under the loading zone to coordinate with South Bay Salt Works and/or the property owner from one direction, then when loading is completed, continue in the same direction to exit. The northern regarding access during construction. Once the bike path is constructed B2 entrance to the Salt Works property is at the north end of the warehouse building shown in Figure 3, where the Project Footprint shows a widening for a crossing approach from Bay Blvd to the property. and operational, it would not impede use or restrict truck movements at Due to the need for trucks to “drive through ” when loading, this entrance must remain open during our either of these existing access points to the South Bay Salt Works. Both business hours to allow us to load specific products. At the south end of the building a similar situation driveways would remain in their existing location and confi guration. occurs, which potentially overlaps with the southern edge of what is identified as the “ Temporary Impact As stated in Section 7.16.d of the IS/MND (page 48), signage would Area” in Figure 3. These accesses must remain open both during construction and after construction. be painted on the bike path near the northern driveway and detectable warnings would be installed on curb ramps to alert people using the bike In Section 2, under Construction the DIS/MND identifies: path of the driveway. The bike path stops/starts just north of the southern Construction access to the South Bay Salt Works and signage (i.e. STOP) would be Construction of the project is anticipated to take approximately seven months to complete. painted on the southbound side of the bike path. A crosswalk is also Grading would require approximately 800 cubic yards (c y) of fill material to be imported. It is proposed to extend across Bay Boulevard at this point to channel people B3 anticipated that construction activities would occur during daytime hours. using the bike path to the other side of the road.

For there to be no negative impacts on South Bay Salt Works, construction activities will need to be scheduled and materials used to allow SBSW the ability to cross both of the existing entrances during B3 Refer to response B2 above. our normal business hours without interruption.

1470 BAY BOULEVARD, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91911 (619) 423-3388, FAX (619) 423-0513

RTC-3 13 COMMENTS RESPONSES

SOUTH BAY SALT WORKS

Section 7-11 Mineral Resources B4 As discussed in response B2, access to the South Bay Salt Works would The report identifies “No Impact”, and specifically reads: remain unimpeded during and after construction of the bike path. As Project implementation would not impact the adjacent Sa lt Works facility or its ability to continue to such, the “No Impact” conclusion remains appropriate. operate as an active mineral resource operation that is a unique local mineral resource site. As the project site is not currently used, or planned for use, as a mi neral resource recovery site and would not affect the adjacent Salt Works facility, no impacts to mine ral resources would occur as a result of project implementation. B4 The “No Impact” designation requires the pr oject makes full accommodation of the Salt Works need to cross the proposed alignment both during construc tion and after construction. While the proposed alignment is not physically itself a Mineral Resourc e, the adjacent Salt works is listed the USGS does list the solar evaporation ponds as a Mineral Resource (8/26/2016 at http://mrdata.usgs.gov/mrds/map.html Mineral Resources On-Line Spatial Data, under Mineral Resources > Online Spatial Data > Mineral Resource Data System > by commodity and searching under “SALT” ).

Drainage B5 Runoff from the bike path would not be directed to fl ow directly to the Section 7.9 “Hydrology and Water Quality” identifies a number of Low Impact or No Impact of the west into the South Bay Salt Works facility. As discussed in Section project on water quality, changes to runoff, flooding potential, or the ability of existing drainage systems 7.9.c-d of the IS/MND (page 36), the project would not alter overall to accommodate the new flows. New impervious surface areas proposed by the project cover existing drainage patterns in the project vicinity. Runoff from the bike B5 approximately .32 acres. The project identifies: “Post-construction drainage woul d be directed from the path would be directed to the east side of the bike path via curb and bike path into a pervious concrete shoulder or a prop osed bioswale and then conveyed to the existing gutter, pervious concrete shoulders, and bioswales, and conveyed to curb drainage ditches via catch basins and pipelines. ” Despite the relatively small addition of impervious surface, the total project area is small. Since the Salt Works inventories the salt adjacent to the proposed inlets, catch basins, and pipelines and into the existing drainage ditch project, the new design features need to avoid re directing any runoff to the west of the bikepath along Bay Boulevard that ultimately outfalls into the Pacifi c Ocean. alignment, which potentially could flow onto the Salt Works next door. Storm flows should be analyzed The proposed drainage facilities would accommodate project runoff in context of heavy rain coinciding with winter ex treme high tides, which diminishes the assimilative and the corresponding minor increase in the 100-year fl ow rate due to B6 capacity of drainage ditches like the Palomar drainage ditch. the additional impervious area added by the bike path (approximately 0.32 acre) while maintaining existing drainage patterns. Thus, fl ows South Bay Salt Works appreciates the opportunity to continue to work with SANDAG and other would not be redirected to the west and towards the South Bay Salt B7 interests on the Bayshore Bikeway Segment 8B. We are available to discuss any of the comments we Works facility. have submitted, and look forward to our concerns being addressed as the project moves forward. B6 As discussed in Section 7.9.e of the IS/MND (pages 36-37), the addition Sincerely, of the bike path and corresponding approximately 0.32-acre net increase Tracy Strahl in impervious area would increase the 100-year storm fl ow by 3.2 cubic Vice President feet per second, but the proposed drainage facilities that empty into the GGTW LLC dba South Bay Salt Works existing drainage ditch along Bay Boulevard would accommodate the [email protected] net increase in runoff such that the capacity of existing and proposed Cell phone 619 917-5018 drainage facilities would not be exceeded. Additionally, the project Office: 619 423-3388 x101 drainage analysis (Appendix F in the Final IS/MND) considered 50-year rainfall intensities coinciding with mean high tide levels. The analysis 1470 BAY BOULEVARD, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91911 demonstrated that the existing drainage ditch along Bay Boulevard would (619) 423-3388, FAX (619) 423-0513 overtop its banks and fl ood adjacent areas with low velocity subcritical fl ow under No Project conditions (i.e., existing conditions). The project has been designed to maintain the cross-sectional area of the drainage

RTC-4 14 COMMENTS RESPONSES

B6 ditch without substantial reduction in its conveyance capacity. The cont. project would not worsen the project area’s existing potential to fl ood during heavy rain events.

B7 Thank you for providing thoughtful comments on the Draft IS/MND. SANDAG looks forward to continuing to work collaboratively with the South Bay Salt Works during fi nal design and construction of the bike path.

RTC-5 15 COMMENTS RESPONSES

C1 This comment provides introductory statements and no further response C1 is required.

C2 The specifi c location of the staging area during construction of the proposed project has not been fi nalized. SANDAG has identifi ed a C2 potential location for staging on vacant land on the east side of Bay Boulevard between Stella Street and Ada Street, as depicted in Figure 3 and identifi ed in the Project Description of the IS/MND (page 4). This location is being considered due its proximity to the proposed project, generally level topography, and the disturbed, vacant condition of this property. SANDAG understands that this property is privately owned C3 by Gabaee, and SANDAG would coordinate with them to negotiate and execute an agreement to obtain permission and/or a temporary construction easement for any use of their property prior to the start of construction.

C3 The Draft IS/MND was available for a 30-day public review period in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15105(b). A copy of the Draft IS/MND was mailed to the law offi ces of Cynthia L. Eldred and to Stacy Brenner (on behalf of Gabaee) at the start of the public review period, as shown on the Draft IS/MND distribution list (Section 8.0). While SANDAG has not extended the CEQA public review period as requested, SANDAG will continue to coordinate and work collaboratively with Gabaee regarding the location of a staging area and any other concerns during fi nal design and construction of the proposed project.

RTC-6 16 AGENDA ITEM NO. 16-11-6 BOARD OF DIRECTORS NOVEMBER 18, 2016 ACTION REQUESTED – INFORMATION

OVERVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS IN THE FINANCIAL File Number 8000180 MARKETS AND QUARTERLY FINANCE REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2016

Introduction

Staff provides quarterly reports intended to keep the Board of Directors informed about the latest developments in the financial markets, the economy, and sales tax revenues; the strategies being explored and implemented to minimize possible impacts to the TransNet Program; and a quarterly report on investments as required per Board Policy No. 003: Investment Policy.

Discussion

Market Review and Update

Overview

Throughout 2016, AAA MMD Rate Movements financial markets have Maturity 9/30/2015 12/31/2015 3/31/2016 6/30/2016 9/30/2016 10/26/2016 been volatile due to 3-Year 0.79% 0.99% 0.81% 0.66% 0.88% 0.94% economic and political 5-Year 1.27% 1.26% 1.07% 0.89% 1.02% 1.12% uncertainties. Rates 10-Year 2.03% 1.92% 1.70% 1.35% 1.51% 1.72% dropped to new 20-Year 2.80% 2.55% 2.44% 1.89% 2.16% 2.40% record lows in the 30-Year 3.04% 2.82% 2.69% 2.02% 2.31% 2.55% aftermath of Brexit (British exit from European Union) as investors began moving from equities to fixed income securities. The volatility that characterized the days immediately following the Brexit referendum gave way to a more stable market as investors concluded that any effects from the vote could take up to two years to be realized. Since then, better-than-expected domestic growth has paved the way for higher rates, but global economic difficulties continue to restrict rates. In reaction to these challenging economic conditions, a number of central banks ramped up stimulus efforts. The Bank of England instituted a bond buying program and cut its policy rate to 0.25 percent. The European Central Bank launched a similar bond buying program (but later questioned its effectiveness and stalled future efforts pending an investigation). The Bank of Japan decided to keep the target rate for its ten-year bond near zero percent. Standard & Poor’s (S&P) finished at 2,139.8, 1.3 percent lower compared to the second quarter of 2016.

Second quarter U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth was revised upward to 1.4 percent, an improvement over the 0.8 percent seen in the first quarter of the year. The labor market remained

strong as 575,000 jobs were added from July to September, the most since the first quarter of 2016. Despite improvements in GDP and the strong labor market, inflation continued to run below the Federal Open Market Committee’s (FOMC) target of 2 percent.

Despite global economic challenges and the uncertainty around the presidential elections, rates have been inching up from the record low levels. Since Brexit the AAA MMD is up by 20 basis points (bps) on the short end and 60 bps on the long end. The increase mainly is attributable to strong and consistent domestic economic growth, characterized by solid job gains, growth in household spending, and an overall increase in economic activity. While rates were not raised at the last FOMC meeting in September, the committee indicated that the case for a rate hike has evidently strengthened and market has already priced in a rate hike for December. Despite this, the rates are still fairly low. The current 30-year AAA MMD is 2.55 percent, down 0.27 percent since the start of the year. This rate has been lower only 1.7 percent of the time since the inception of the index.

AAA MMD Yield Curve Movement

6/30/2015 12/31/2015 6/30/2016 Current (10/26/2016) 3.50% 3.00% 2.50% 2.00% 1.50% 1.00% 0.50% 0.00% 1-Year 2-Year 3-Year 4-Year 5-Year 6-Year 7-Year 8-Year 9-Year 10-Year 11-Year 12-Year 13-Year 14-Year 15-Year 16-Year 17-Year 18-Year 19-Year 20-Year 21-Year 22-Year 23-Year 24-Year 25-Year 26-Year 27-Year 28-Year 29-Year 30-Year

Benchmark Tax-Exempt Rate History Benchmark Tax-Exempt Rate History (June 1, 1981, Inception to October 26, 2016) (January 2, 2015, to October 26, 2016)

30-Year AAA MMD Increase from Previos Day (Left Axis) Decrease from Previous Day (Left Axis) 13.50% 30-Year AAA MMD (Right Axis)

11.50% 15 bps 3.50%

10 bps 9.50% 3.25% 5 bps 3.00% 7.50% 0 bps 2.75%

5.50% -5 bps 2.50%

-10 bps 2.25% 3.50% -15 bps 2.00% 1.50% -20 bps 1.75%

2 Municipal Market Supply1

Through September, municipal bond supply Issuance Volume was up 5.9 percent to $303.9 billion in 2016 compared to $286.9 billion in 2015. Both $50 2015 2016 August and September issuance totals were $40

largest on record. The significantly higher Billions supply resulted in issuers having to offer $30 higher yields with some widening in credit $20 spreads. The rush to market primarily was due to issuers pulling deals forward to avoid $10 uncertainty around the U.S. presidential election in November and a potential Federal $0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept rate hike in December. Approximately 41.8 percent is due to refunding existing bonds, while 37.4 percent is from issuing new money bonds. The remainder is attributable to combined new money and refunding transactions. The transportation sector’s issuance volume is $29.7 billion, up 7.8 percent compared to 2015.

Interest Rate Forecasts

After raising the federal funds target rate at their December 2015 meeting, FOMC officials have voted against raising rates at each of their six meetings in 2016. Inflation remains below the FOMC’s target rate of 2 percent and has been a primary factor preventing a rate hike. However, the minutes of the September meeting indicated that several members dissented in favor of a rate hike “relatively soon.” With the November meeting scheduled before the presidential elections, decisive action, if any, can only be expected at the December meeting.

The table below provides an average of interest rate forecasts by industry professionals. These are surveyed and compiled by Bloomberg. As noted, the ten-year United States Department of the Treasury (U.S. Treasury) rate is forecast to decrease slightly to 1.72 percent by the fourth quarter of calendar year 2016. The 30-year U.S. Treasury is forecast to decrease to 2.47 percent by the fourth quarter of calendar year 2016. The two-year U.S. Treasury is forecast to increase slightly to 0.9 percent by the fourth quarter of 2016. All of these levels are higher than what was forecast at the time of the last quarterly update. Separate from these forecasts, Bloomberg calculates the probability of the FOMC raising the target Fed Funds Rate based on trading data. Based on the current market data, there is a nearly 72.5 percent chance of a rate hike at the FOMC’s December 2016 meeting.

The Street's Interest Rate Forecast2 Forecast 10/26/16 Q4 16 Q1 17 Q2 17 Q3 17 Q4 17 Q1 18 30-Year UST 2.54% 2.47% 2.55% 2.68% 2.76% 2.84% 2.99% 10-Year UST 1.79% 1.72% 1.82% 1.92% 2.02% 2.12% 2.34% 2-Year UST 0.87% 0.90% 0.99% 1.12% 1.23% 1.35% 1.56%

1 Issuance data from Thomson Reuters 2 Bloomberg survey compilation as of October 26, 2016

3 The Street's Interest Rate Forecast Forecast 10/26/16 Q4 16 Q1 17 Q2 17 Q3 17 Q4 17 Q1 18 3M LIBOR 0.89% 0.94% 1.02% 1.14% 1.24% 1.37% 1.62% Fed Funds Target Rate 0.50% 0.70% 0.75% 0.90% 1.00% 1.15% 1.30% Upper Bound Fed Funds Target Rate 0.25% 0.46% 0.51% 0.67% 0.73% 0.89% 1.04% Lower Bound

Debt Portfolio Overview and Update

Outstanding Debt Overview SANDAG has $1.78 billion of outstanding long-term debt, consisting of the Series 2008 variable-rate bonds, the 2010 Series A taxable Build America Bonds, the 2010 Series B tax-exempt fixed-rate bonds, the 2012 Series A tax-exempt fixed-rate bonds, the 2014 Series A tax-exempt fixed-rate bonds, and the 2016 Series A tax-exempt fixed-rate bonds. Of the total debt portfolio, 23 percent consists of synthetic fixed-rate bonds (variable-rate bonds hedged with fixed-payer interest rate swaps) and the remaining 77 percent are fixed-rate bonds. A summary of the outstanding bonds is tabulated and graphically presented below.

Summary of Outstanding Debt Series Tax Status Coupon Type Original Issue Size Outstanding Par Call Option Final Maturity 2008A Tax-Exempt Variable-Rate $150,000,000 $100,575,000 Current 4/1/2038 2008B Tax-Exempt Variable-Rate $150,000,000 $100,575,000 Current 4/1/2038 2008C Tax-Exempt Variable-Rate $150,000,000 $100,575,000 Current 4/1/2038 2008D Tax-Exempt Variable-Rate $150,000,000 $100,575,000 Current 4/1/2038 2010A Taxable BABs Fixed-Rate $338,960,000 $338,960,000 Make-Whole 4/1/2048 2010B Tax-Exempt Fixed-Rate $11,040,000 $7,590,000 4/1/2020 4/1/2030 2012A Tax-Exempt Fixed-Rate $420,585,000 $357,695,000 4/1/2022 4/1/2048 2014A Tax-Exempt Fixed-Rate $350,000,000 $345,540,000 4/1/2024 4/1/2048 2016A Tax-Exempt Fixed-Rate $325,000,000 $325,000,000 4/1/2026 4/1/2048 Total $1,777,085,000

Outstanding Par Breakdown by Fixed and Hedged Outstanding Par Breakdown by Tax Status

Synthetic Taxable Fixed Rate BABs $402.3MM $339.0MM 23% 19%

Fixed Rate Tax-Exempt $1,374.8MM $1,438.1MM 77% 81%

4 Debt Service and Coverage

As seen in the figure below, SANDAG has an aggregate level debt service profile with approximately $105.3 million in debt service per year through FY 2048. Debt service coverage, using sales tax receipts of $276.3 million for the last 12 months ended September 30, 2016, is 2.62 times. For every $1.00 of debt service, SANDAG received $2.62 of sales tax revenue providing ample coverage. This high debt service coverage, together with the level annual debt service payment, the fairly conservative debt portfolio, and a well-managed program are critical factors that support the SANDAG triple-A ratings from Fitch and S&P.

Aggregate Debt Service Profile

Series 2008A Series 2008B Series 2008C Series 2008D Series 2010A Series 2010B Series 2012A Series 2014A Series 2016A $120

Millions $100

$80

$60

$40

$20

$0 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048

Recent Variable-Rate Demand Bond and Swap Mark-to-Market Performance

SANDAG has $402.3 million of outstanding variable-rate demand bonds (Series 2008 A, B, C, and D), as shown below. These variable-rate demand bonds (VRDBs) are backed by Standby Bond Purchase Agreements (SBPAs) from certain financial institutions. The interest rate on these bonds resets weekly through a remarketing process.

The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) Index (the benchmark short-term municipal index) reset to 0.63 percent on October 26, 2016. It is anomalously higher than where it began the year at 0.01 percent. This is due to investors moving dollars out of tax-exempt money market mutual funds in an attempt to comply with new Net Asset Value rules, which became effective in October. Although it is typically equal to 70 percent of the 1-Month London Interbank Offer Rate (LIBOR), SIFMA spiked to well over 150 percent of the 1-Month LIBOR in the months leading up to October. With the last couple resets in October, SIFMA seems to be reverting to expected levels relative to 1-Month LIBOR. Even with SIFMA increasing, SANDAG VRDBs continue to trade well compared to this benchmark.

5

SANDAG Series 2008ABCD VRDB Resets Since December 31, 2015

Series SBPA Provider Remarketing Agent Reset Average SIFMA Average Spread to SIFMA

J.P. Morgan Chase Bank 0.37% 2008A Barclays Capital Inc. 0.36% -1 bps NA

J.P. Morgan Chase Bank 0.37% 2008B Goldman Sachs & Company 0.37% 0 bps NA

2008C Mizuho Corporate Bank J.P. Morgan Securities LLC 0.37% 0.37% 0 bps

Stifel, Nicolaus & Company 0.37% 2008D State Street 0.37% 0 bps Inc.

SANDAG also has $402.3 million of fixed-payer interest rate swaps outstanding, the purpose of which is to hedge the interest rate variability associated with the $402.3 million of variable-rate bonds. Additionally, SANDAG has $313.2 million of basis swaps outstanding. Under the basis swaps, which become effective on April 1, 2018, when the existing fixed-payer swaps originally were scheduled to convert from the LIBOR to the SIFMA-based indices, SANDAG will pay its counterparty a floating interest rate payment based upon the SIFMA Index and will receive a floating payment based upon 107.4 percent of three-month LIBOR. The market value of the SANDAG swap portfolio changes with interest rate fluctuations. The mark-to-market valuation, as of October 26, 2016, is approximately ($108,509,533); meaning SANDAG would need to pay approximately $108.5 million to terminate the entire swap portfolio in the current market. However, the swaps are performing as expected and currently there are no reasons that SANDAG would terminate the swaps. Additionally, SANDAG is not required to post collateral under the swap agreements. On an annual basis and in accordance with SANDAG Board Policy No. 032: San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission Interest Rate Swap Policy, an annual written description of the swaps and an evaluation of the risks associated with outstanding interest rate swaps are presented to the Board of Directors for review.

(Rest of this page intentionally left blank)

6

Swap Portfolio Overview

MTM Value Associated SANDAG SANDAG Trade Effective Maturity Notional Bank (As of Series Pays Receives Date Date Date Outstanding Counterparty 10/26/16)

65% of USD- LIBOR 'til Bank of Series 2008 3.8165% 04/18; SIFMA 05/23/12 05/23/12 04/01/2038 ($41,825,408) $134,100,000 America, N.A. Swap Index (A1/A/A+) thereafter

65% of USD- Goldman Sachs LIBOR 'til Mitsui Marine Series 2008 3.8165% 04/18; SIFMA 05/23/12 05/23/12 04/01/2038 ($41,825,408) $134,100,000 Derivative Swap Index Products, L.P. thereafter (Aa2/AA+)

Bank of 65% of USD- Series 2008 3.4100% 05/23/12 05/23/12 04/01/2038 ($40,517,798) $134,100,000 America, N.A. LIBOR (A1/A/A+)

Total Fixed Payer Swaps ($124,168,614) $402,300,000

SIFMA Barclays Bank 107.4% of 3 Series 2008 Swap 03/19/09 04/01/18 04/01/2038 $7,829,541 $156,600,000 PLC Month LIBOR Index (A2/A-/A)

SIFMA Barclays Bank 107.4% of 3 Series 2008 Swap 03/19/09 04/01/18 04/01/2038 $7,829,541 $156,600,000 PLC Month LIBOR Index (A2/A-/A)

Total Index Conversion Swaps $15,659,082 $313,200,000

Total Combined ($108,509,533) $715,500,000

Cost of Capital

SANDAG has a very attractive weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of 3.78 percent. This cost can vary based upon swap performance and the cost of liquidity to support the variable-rate debt. The 2008A-D bonds with the current swap rate and associated fees provide a cost of capital equal to 4.1 percent. The 2010A bonds were issued as taxable Build America Bonds and have a borrowing cost of 3.89 percent. The 2010B tax-exempt bonds have a borrowing cost of 3.14 percent. The 2012A and 2014A bonds were sold at an all-in cost of 3.72 percent and 3.85 percent, respectively. The most recent Series 2016A bonds were sold at an all-in cost of 3.29 percent. Taken together, SANDAG has issued approximately $1.89 billion in bonds, to accelerate project delivery, for a weighted average cost of 3.78 percent.

SANDAG’s WACC Calculations Synthetic Fixed Rate:

Remarketing Agent Series Par Post ‘12 Refunding Swap Rate SBPA Fee Cost of Capital Fee 2008A $100,575,000 3.8165% 0.390% 0.06% 4.2665% 2008B $100,575,000 3.8165% 0.390% 0.06% 4.2665% 2008C1 $67,050,000 3.8165% 0.320% 0.06% 4.1965%

7 SANDAG’s WACC Calculations 2008C2 $33,525,000 3.4100% 0.320% 0.06% 3.7900% 2008D $100,575,000 3.4100% 0.340% 0.06% 3.8100% 2008 Weighted Avg. 4.1010% Fixed Rate: Series Original Par - - - All-in TIC 2010A $338,960,000 - - - 3.8871% 2010B $11,040,000 - - - 3.1434% 2012A $420,585,000 - - - 3.7167% 2014A $350,000,000 - - - 3.8507% 2016A $325,000,000 - - - 3.2947% Total Weighted Avg. 3.7832%

Commercial Paper

In addition to the long-term debt, SANDAG has a short-term commercial paper program supported by a Letter of Credit from Union Bank. The commercial paper program was authorized at $100 million and has a current outstanding balance of $27.2 million as of October 31, 2016. The paper was most recently remarketed out 56 days at a rate of 82 basis points. The Letter of Credit expires in September 2017.

Looking Ahead

SANDAG and its financing team continue to make progress in discussions and preparation of a formal application for a Federal Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) loan to support the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project. SANDAG provided TIFIA staff with a revised plan in June. Following its credit committee, TIFIA invited SANDAG to formally apply this fall. SANDAG met with rating agencies to receive indicative ratings, and the application was filed in the first week of November with the TIFIA office. The TIFIA loan currently is expected to be successfully executed in the first quarter of calendar year 2017.

Quarterly Investment Data

Included with this quarterly finance report through September 30, 2016, are: a summary of portfolio balances by institution (Attachment 1); a detail of portfolio balances by account (Attachment 2); and a detail of portfolio balances by investment type (Attachment 3) for all money under the direction or care of SANDAG, including funds of the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission (RTC), SourcePoint, and the Automated Regional Justice Information System (ARJIS).

As of September 30, 2016, a total of $1.13 billion was held by SANDAG in a number of investment accounts, in comparison to $661.3 million held in the previous quarter. The $470 million increase during the quarter primarily is due to the issuance of the 2016 Series A tax-exempt fixed-rate bonds, timing of TransNet sales tax receipts, TransNet debt service payments, TransNet allocation payments

8 to other local governmental agencies, and the use of TransNet bond and commercial paper proceeds to fund current projects.3

Approximately $7.4 million was held in nine U.S. Bank, N.A. accounts at the end of the quarter. Funds in these accounts are used for operating purposes. Approximately $1.12 billion was invested in six institutions, as follows:

1. State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) – State law allows local agencies (RTC and SANDAG) to invest up to $65 million per agency in LAIF. These funds hold excess operating funds for the RTC and SANDAG. A total of approximately $72 million was invested in LAIF, of which the RTC held approximately $64.5 million of sales tax funds and SANDAG held $7.5 million. These funds are highly liquid and may be accessed easily for immediate operating needs.

2. California Asset Management Program (CAMP) – These are funds administered by one of the two SANDAG financial advisors, PFM. The Cash Reserve Portfolio, totaling $131.5 million, is used for the investment of the 2008 bond reserves; the 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, and 2016 bond investments for future principal and interest payments; and excess operating funds for Interstate 15 FasTrak®, State Route 125 (SR 125), ARJIS, Coronado Bridge Toll Funds, and TransNet sales tax funds not yet paid for TransNet-approved projects. In addition, CAMP uses the Individual Portfolio, totaling $455 million, for the investment of SR 125 reserves for future projects; the 2008 and 2016 TransNet bond proceeds; the 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, and 2016 bond investments for future principal and interest payments; and TransNet sales tax funds not yet paid to other local governmental agencies.

3. U.S. Bank – These funds, totaling approximately $40 million, were held by U.S. Bank, Trustee for bond debt service payments and payment of interest on the short-term Commercial Paper Program, as part of the TransNet Program, for the toll revenues of the SR 125 franchise, and for retention held through the completion of projects. Of this balance, $26.8 million of the investments held by U.S. Bank is invested in North County Transit District auction rate securities purchased with commercial paper.

4.e Th Bank of New York Mellon – These are funds administered by one of the two SANDAG financial advisors, Cutwater Asset Management. The Individual Portfolio, totaling $207.8 million, and the Cash Reserve Portfolio, totaling $1.2 million, are used for the investment of excess TransNet sales tax revenue not yet paid for TransNet-approved projects.

5. San Diego County Treasurer’s Pooled Money Fund – These funds, totaling $215.9 million, were held by the San Diego County Treasurer’s Pooled Money Fund. The funds consist of the ARJIS, the SANDAG Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies, SourcePoint, Interstate 15 FasTrak, and TransNet sales tax revenues.

6. California Bank and Trust – There was $479,115 on deposit with California Bank and Trust pursuant to capital project escrow retention agreements with various contractors.

3 Due to rounding, the numbers below may not tie to the attached detail of investments.

9 The chart below provides a snapshot of the investment holding locations as of June 30, 2016.

Investment Holdings US BANK, N.A.

LAIF

CAMP IP

CAMP CASH RESERVE

US BANK

BNY MELLON IP

BNY MELLON CASH RESERVE

COSD TREASURER'S POOL

CALIFORNIA BANK AND TRUST

As shown in the chart below, as of September 30, 2016, the yield on cost of the portfolio was 0.98 percent, with a weighted average maturity of 399 days, in comparison to 0.95 percent and 514 days in the prior quarter.

Quarterly Yield on Cost 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Jun-08 Jun-09 Jun-10 Jun-11 Jun-12 Jun-13 Jun-14 Jun-15 Jun-16 Sep-08 Sep-09 Sep-10 Sep-11 Sep-12 Sep-13 Sep-14 Sep-15 Sep-16 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11 Dec-12 Dec-13 Dec-14 Dec-15 Mar-09 Mar-10 Mar-11 Mar-12 Mar-13 Mar-14 Mar-15 Mar-16

The Finance Department has continued to implement the Board of Directors investment objectives of safety, liquidity, and return on investment for the SANDAG investment portfolio. These will continue to be important investment objectives for the future.

10 Certifications

The Director of Finance reports that this investment portfolio, together with the authorized short- term Commercial Paper Program, will provide the necessary liquidity to meet the expenditure requirements of SANDAG, RTC, ARJIS, and SourcePoint for the next six months. This portfolio is in compliance with state law and Board Policy No. 003.

The Local Economy and Sales Tax Revenues

The United States economy’s growth in 2016 is similar to that of 2015. The nation’s total value of goods and services produced, GDP, rose at an annual rate of 0.8 percent during the first quarter of 2016, rising to 1.4 percent in the second quarter, with the estimate of third quarter growth at 2.9 percent. The slow economic growth has forced most forecasters to keep their economic growth estimate for the full year at 2 percent or lower, which would be slightly down from the 2.6 percent growth achieved in 2015.

The slow economic growth primarily has been attributed not to poor domestic conditions, but to troublesome international issues, such as BREXIT and sluggish Euro zone performance, slowing or negative growth in emerging economies, and continued or escalating strife in the Middle East.

To achieve a GDP growth rate of 3.25 percent or higher likely requires more jobs in total, more jobs of a higher quality, and more wages than have been produced over this past year. Job growth during 2015 averaged 230,000 new jobs per month, and in 2016 has averaged 180,000 monthly, continuing an unprecedented streak of positive monthly job growth dating back to October 2010. Nearly 2.4 million jobs were created nationwide during the past 12 months (a growth rate of about 2%). The increase in job production pushed the unemployment rate down to 5 percent currently, nearly the same level as before the start of the Great Recession. Recently, the unemployment rate has stabilized even with job growth, as the labor force has increased modestly.

Locally, the increase in jobs has outpaced the improved national rate. The San Diego region recorded 37,000 new payroll jobs in the last 12 months, a rise of 2.4 percent. In addition, the local unemployment rate dropped more than the nation’s, falling to 4.7 percent below the national level. Generally, wage growth has been sluggish to nonexistent during the recovery, but reports in the last several months have indicated that wages are starting to trend upward.

The improved trend for job growth is dampened by lingering concerns about the volatility of economic growth and political stability globally. Additional concerns include weakness in wage growth and the average number of hours worked, but recent signs have been positive, though wage gains since 2008 primarily have accrued to high earners. These trends, combined with the types of jobs (primarily lower-paying) that have been created since the end of the recession, have contributed to keeping real per-capita disposable income almost stagnant for the past decade, and only rising slowly in the past two years. This in turn has led to weak growth in consumer spending, which makes up more than 70 percent of the economy and is a primary driver of sales tax revenue. While personal consumption expenditures have driven recent GDP gains, private investment and government expenditures have been flat. Additional economic headwinds are expected from the slowing of economic growth globally and in turn, the effect on the trade value of the dollar. Most of the United States’ major trading partners continue to experience slower economic growth, including China, Japan, Europe, Mexico, Brazil, and Russia. In turn, the trade value of the dollar is rising, making U.S. goods in these markets more expensive and reducing U.S. exports, which

11 provides a drag on the national economy.

These economic headwinds and volatility, as well as some potential structural changes, are affecting consumer spending habits. Locally, for example, taxable retail sales over the last four quarters (July 2015-June 2016) have increased 2.6 percent, which is below the 3.5 percent expected, and also lower than other regions in California. Much of the local slowdown is from the reduction in gas prices and relatively weak auto sales, which are slowing again after robust post-recession recovery. In addition, the trend away from brick-and-mortar to online retail, as well as reduced cross-border retail activity from the decline in the Mexican Peso have been a drag on local retail sales. In light of the decline in the unemployment rate, increase in labor force, and small uptick in wages since last year, taxable sales could be expected to pick up as consumer confidence and economic status improve.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachments: 1. SANDAG Summary of Portfolio Balances (by Institution) as of September 30, 2016 2. SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Account) as of September 30, 2016 3. SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Investment Type) as of September 30, 2016

Key Staff Contacts: André Douzdjian, (619) 699-6931, [email protected] Ray Major, (619) 699-1930, [email protected] Lisa Kondrat-Dauphin, (619) 699-1942, [email protected]

12 SANDAG Attachment 1 Summary of Portfolio Balances (by Institution) as of September 30, 2016

Wtd. Avg. Book Percent of Market Market Unrealized Yield on Days to Institution Value Portfolio Value Price Gain/(Loss) Cost Maturity

US BANK, N.A. $ 7,440,713.99 0.66% $ 7,440,713.99 100.00% $ - N/A 1

STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) 72,044,013.21 6.37% 72,044,013.21 100.00% - 0.65% 165 **

CALIFORNIA ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CAMP) INDIVIDUAL PORTFOLIO 454,790,632.20 40.20% 455,016,462.33 100.05% 225,830.13 1.11% 482

CALIFORNIA ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CAMP) CASH RESERVE PORTFOLIO 131,532,760.95 11.63% 131,532,760.95 100.00% - 0.64% 53 **

US BANK 40,006,428.65 3.54% 40,006,428.65 100.00% - 0.56% 9

THE BANK OF NEW YORK (BNY) MELLON INDIVIDUAL PORTFOLIO 207,944,689.64 18.38% 207,751,354.78 99.91% (193,334.86) 1.12% 594

THE BANK OF NEW YORK (BNY) MELLON CASH RESERVE PORTFOLIO 1,215,418.97 0.11% 1,215,418.97 100.00% - 0.00% 1

SAN DIEGO COUNTY TREASURER'S POOLED MONEY FUND 215,865,387.52 19.08% 215,865,387.52 100.00% - 0.98% 415 **

CALIFORNIA BANK AND TRUST 479,115.59 0.04% 479,115.59 100.00% - 0.05% 1

TOTAL $ 1,131,319,160.72 100.00%$ 1,131,351,655.99 100.00% $ 32,495.27 0.98% 399 ** Although average days to maturity is greater than one day, funds are available at par the same day.

Summary of Portfolio Balances (by Agency)

Wtd. Avg. Book Percent of Market Market Unrealized Yield on Days to Agency Value Portfolio Value Price Gain/(Loss) Cost Maturity

SANDAG FUNDS $ 102,188,138.34 9.03% $ 102,081,804.99 99.90%$ (106,333.35) 0.73% 236

ARJIS FUNDS (Automated Regional Justice Information System) 9,697,324.20 0.86% 9,697,324.20 100.00% - 0.73% 142

SOURCEPOINT FUNDS 413,204.68 0.04% 413,204.68 100.00% - 0.98% 171

CORONADO BRIDGE TOLL FUNDS 274,352.51 0.02% 274,352.51 100.00% - 0.64% 53

RTC FUNDS (San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission) 1,018,746,140.99 90.04% 1,018,884,969.61 100.01% 138,828.62 1.01% 418

TOTAL $ 1,131,319,160.72 100.00%$ 1,131,351,655.99 100.00% $ 32,495.27 0.98% 399

Note: In addition to the funds held above, there is $4,750 petty cash held at SANDAG.

13 Attachment 2

SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Account) as of September 30, 2016

Percent Wtd. Avg. Book of Market Market Unrealized Yield on Days to Institution / Account Value Portfolio Value Price Gain/(Loss) Cost Maturity

US BANK, N.A.: Checking - TransNet Sales Tax (RTC) $ 787,466.53 0.07% $ 787,466.53 100.00% $ - N/A 1 Checking - SANDAG General 1,078,367.04 0.10% 1,078,367.04 100.00% - N/A 1 Checking - SANDAG Flexible Spending Acct (FSA) 92,739.43 0.01% 92,739.43 100.00% - N/A 1 Checking - SANDAG Interstate 15 (I-15) FasTrak ® 2,002,030.40 0.18% 2,002,030.40 100.00% - N/A 1 Checking - SANDAG SAFE Program Acct 93,060.77 0.01% 93,060.77 100.00% - N/A 1 Checking - SourcePoint 244,006.80 0.02% 244,006.80 100.00% - N/A 1 Checking - ARJIS 549,720.63 0.05% 549,720.63 100.00% - N/A 1 Checking - State Route 125 (SR 125) Payment Account 2,452,923.57 0.22% 2,452,923.57 100.00% - N/A 1 Checking - SR 125 Collection Account 140,398.82 0.01% 140,398.82 100.00% - N/A 1

TOTAL US BANK, N.A. $ 7,440,713.99 0.66% $ 7,440,713.99 100.00% $ - N/A 1

STATE OF CA LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF): TransNet (RTC) $ 64,541,292.88 5.70% $ 64,541,292.88 100.00% $ - 0.65% 165 SANDAG 7,502,720.33 0.66% 7,502,720.33 100.00% - 0.65% 165

TOTAL LAIF $ 72,044,013.21 6.37% $ 72,044,013.21 100.00% $ - 0.65% 165 **

CALIFORNIA ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CAMP): INDIVIDUAL PORTFOLIO: TransNet Sales Tax (RTC) $ 222,213,294.01 19.64% $ 222,328,409.06 100.05% $ 115,115.05 1.14% 705 TransNet 2008 Bond Proceeds A/B/C/D Reserve Fund (RTC) 6,366,724.63 0.56% 6,385,951.80 100.30% 19,227.17 0.90% 292 TransNet 2010 Bond Proceeds Series B Principal (RTC) 109,370.43 0.01% 109,736.71 100.33% 366.28 0.68% 181 TransNet 2012 Bond Proceeds Series A Principal (RTC) 2,714,375.30 0.24% 2,723,465.64 100.33% 9,090.34 0.68% 181 TransNet 2014 Bond Proceeds Series A Principal (RTC) 765,593.03 0.07% 768,156.97 100.33% 2,563.94 0.68% 181 TransNet 2016 Bond Proceeds Series A Project (RTC) 184,748,041.28 16.33% 184,933,620.05 100.10% 185,578.77 1.14% 241 Sage Hill Endowment (RTC) 824,043.00 0.07% 824,264.93 100.03% 221.93 0.68% 391 SANDAG Toll Rd Project Major Main Reserve Acct 27,137,343.33 2.40% 27,055,885.40 99.70% (81,457.93) 0.85% 397 SANDAG Toll Rd Project Extraordinary Reserve Acct 9,911,847.19 0.88% 9,886,971.77 99.75% (24,875.42) 0.92% 453

TOTAL INDIVIDUAL PORTFOLIO $ 454,790,632.20 40.20% $ 455,016,462.33 100.05% $ 225,830.13 1.11% 482

14 SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Account) as of September 30, 2016

Percent Wtd. Avg. Book of Market Market Unrealized Yield on Days to Institution / Account Value Portfolio Value Price Gain/(Loss) Cost Maturity CASH RESERVE PORTFOLIO: I-15 FasTrak $ 622,443.15 0.06%$ 622,443.15 100.00%$ - 0.64% 53 ARJIS 6,691,227.55 0.59% 6,691,227.55 100.00% - 0.64% 53 California Coastal Commission 1,162,147.50 0.10% 1,162,147.50 100.00% - 0.64% 53 SANDAG SR 125 1,855,251.19 0.16% 1,855,251.19 100.00% - 0.64% 53 SANDAG Toll Road Project Maint 20,900,047.06 1.85% 20,900,047.06 100.00% - 0.64% 53 Coronado Bridge Toll Funds 274,352.51 0.02% 274,352.51 100.00% - 0.64% 53 SANDAG Toll Road Extraordinary Reserve 3,916,261.86 0.35% 3,916,261.86 100.00% - 0.64% 53 SANDAG Shoreline Management Account 161,901.92 0.01% 161,901.92 100.00% - 0.64% 53 2008 Bond Series A/B/C/D Reserve Fund (RTC) 10,867,550.64 0.96% 10,867,550.64 100.00% - 0.64% 53 2008 Bond Series A - Principal (RTC) 1.00 0.00% 1.00 100.00% - 0.64% 53 2008 Bond Series B - Principal (RTC) 1.00 0.00% 1.00 100.00% - 0.64% 53 2008 Bond Series C - Principal (RTC) 1.00 0.00% 1.00 100.00% - 0.64% 53 2008 Bond Series D - Principal (RTC) 1.00 0.00% 1.00 100.00% - 0.64% 53 2010 Bond Series B - Principal (RTC) 223,475.91 0.02% 223,475.91 100.00% - 0.64% 53 2010 Bond Series B - Interest (RTC) 154,428.16 0.01% 154,428.16 100.00% - 0.64% 53 2010 Bond Series A - Interest (RTC) 10,036,478.17 0.89% 10,036,478.17 100.00% - 0.64% 53 2012 Bond Series A - Interest (RTC) 8,664,687.77 0.77% 8,664,687.77 100.00% - 0.64% 53 2012 Bond Series A - Principal (RTC) 5,419,728.13 0.48% 5,419,728.13 100.00% - 0.64% 53 2008 Sales Tax Account - TransNet Extension (RTC) 35,485,902.58 3.14% 35,485,902.58 100.00% - 0.64% 53 Wetland Mitigation TransNet Sales Tax (RTC) 292,335.09 0.03% 292,335.09 100.00% - 0.64% 53 Sage Hill Endowment (RTC) 1,749.50 0.00% 1,749.50 100.00% - 0.64% 53 2014 Bond Series A - Principal (RTC) 1,532,224.84 0.14% 1,532,224.84 100.00% - 0.64% 53 2014 Bond Series A - Interest (RTC) 8,601,618.33 0.76% 8,601,618.33 100.00% - 0.64% 53 2014 Bond Series A Project Del Mar Fund (RTC) 795,225.31 0.07% 795,225.31 100.00% - 0.64% 53 2014 Bond Series A Project Santee Fund (RTC) 2,419,798.07 0.21% 2,419,798.07 100.00% - 0.64% 53 2016 Bond Series A Project Fund (RTC) 11,453,921.71 1.01% 11,453,921.71 100.00% - 0.64% 53

TOTAL CASH RESERVE PORTFOLIO $ 131,532,760.95 11.63% $ 131,532,760.95 100.00% $ - 0.64% 53 **

TOTAL CAMP $ 586,323,393.15 51.83% $ 586,549,223.28 100.04% $ - 1.01% 386

15 SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Account) as of September 30, 2016

Percent Wtd. Avg. Book of Market Market Unrealized Yield on Days to Institution / Account Value Portfolio Value Price Gain/(Loss) Cost Maturity US BANK: Capital Project Retention Account $ 1,425,992.43 0.13%$ 1,425,992.43 100.00%$ - 0.10% 1 SANDAG - Toll Road Project Revenue 3,844,412.46 0.34% 3,844,412.46 100.00% - 0.10% 1 SANDAG - Toll Road Project Capital Expenditure Reserve 537,497.57 0.05% 537,497.57 100.00% - 0.10% 1 SANDAG - Toll Road Project Expense Fund - TIFIA Note Expense Acct 10,022.15 0.00% 10,022.15 100.00% - 0.10% 1 SANDAG - Toll Road Project Senior Obligation Debt Service - Interest 981,696.59 0.09% 981,696.59 100.00% - 0.10% 1 SANDAG - Toll Road Project Senior Obligation Debt Service - Principal 97,244.47 0.01% 97,244.47 100.00% - 0.10% 1 SANDAG - Toll Road Proj First Subord Obl TransNet Payment 562.89 0.00% 562.89 100.00% - 0.10% 1 SANDAG - Toll Road Project SANDAG Distribution 1,001,383.46 0.09% 1,001,383.46 100.00% - 0.10% 1 2008 Revenue Bond Series A Interest (RTC) 0.11 0.00% 0.11 100.00% - 0.00% 1 2008 Bond Series A/B/C/D Main Interest (RTC) 1,395,695.08 0.12% 1,395,695.08 100.00% - 0.10% 1 Commercial Paper Series B - NCTD Interest (RTC) 227,961.21 0.02% 227,961.21 100.00% - 0.10% 1 NCTD Certificates of Participation 26,750,000.00 2.36% 26,750,000.00 100.00% - 0.76% 13 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds 2010 Series A Interest (RTC) 3,267,859.47 0.29% 3,267,859.47 100.00% - 0.10% 1 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds 2016 Series A COI (RTC) 247,229.29 0.02% 247,229.29 100.00% - 0.10% 1 Sales Tax Revenue CP Notes Series B Interest (RTC) 332.03 0.00% 332.03 100.00% - 0.00% 1 Sales Tax Revenue CP Notes Series B Principal (RTC) 218,539.44 0.02% 218,539.44 100.00% - 0.00% 1

TOTAL US BANK $ 40,006,428.65 3.54% $ 40,006,428.65 100.00% $ - 0.56% 9

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON: INDIVIDUAL PORTFOLIO: TransNet Extension (RTC) $ 207,944,689.64 18.38% $ 207,751,354.78 99.91% $ (193,334.86) 1.12% 594

TOTAL INDIVIDUAL PORTFOLIO $ 207,944,689.64 18.38% $ 207,751,354.78 99.91% $ (193,334.86) 1.12% 594

CASH RESERVE: TransNet Extension (RTC) $ 1,215,418.97 0.11% $ 1,215,418.97 100.00% $ - 0.00% 1

TOTAL CASH RESERVE $ 1,215,418.97 0.11% $ 1,215,418.97 100.00% $ - 0.00% 1

TOTAL THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON $ 209,160,108.61 18.49% $ 208,966,773.75 99.91% $ (193,334.86) 1.11% 591

16 SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Account) as of September 30, 2016

Percent Wtd. Avg. Book of Market Market Unrealized Yield on Days to Institution / Account Value Portfolio Value Price Gain/(Loss) Cost Maturity SAN DIEGO COUNTY TREASURER'S POOLED MONEY FUND: SourcePoint Cash Reserve Fund $ 169,197.88 0.01%$ 169,197.88 100.00%$ - 0.98% 415 SDCRTC 2016 Bonds (RTC) 133,540,000.00 11.80% 133,540,000.00 100.00% - 0.98% 415 SANDAG I-15 FasTrak 6,466,867.96 0.57% 6,466,867.96 100.00% - 0.98% 415 TransNet Extension (RTC) 64,919,086.45 5.74% 64,919,086.45 100.00% - 0.98% 415 ARJIS 2,456,376.02 0.22% 2,456,376.02 100.00% - 0.98% 415 SANDAG SAFE Program 8,313,859.21 0.73% 8,313,859.21 100.00% - 0.98% 415

TOTAL SAN DIEGO COUNTY TREASURER'S POOLED MONEY FUND $ 215,865,387.52 19.08%$ 215,865,387.52 100.00%$ - 0.98% 415 **

CALIFORNIA BANK AND TRUST: Capital Project Retention Accounts $ 479,115.59 0.04%$ 479,115.59 100.00%$ - 0.05% 1

TOTAL CALIFORNIA BANK AND TRUST $ 479,115.59 0.04%$ 479,115.59 100.00%$ - 0.05% 1

TOTAL $ 1,131,319,160.72 100.00%$ 1,131,351,655.99 100.00%$ 32,495.27 0.98% 399

Legend: Automated Regional Justice Information System (ARJIS) Commercial Paper (CP) State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) North County Transit District (NCTD) San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) ** Although average days to maturity is greater than one day, funds are available at par the same day.

17 Attachment 3

SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Investment Type) as of September 30, 2016

Wtd. Avg. Purchase Maturity Unrealized S&P Moody's Yield Days to Investment Date Date Book Value Market Value Gain / (Loss) Par Value Rating Rating on Cost Maturity

Cash and cash equivalents: Demand deposits: Checking - TransNet Sales Tax (RTC) N/A N/A$ 787,466.53 $ 787,466.53 $ - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - SANDAG General N/A N/A 1,078,367.04 1,078,367.04 - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - SANDAG Flexible Spending Acct (FSA) N/A N/A 92,739.43 92,739.43 - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - SANDAG Interstate 15 (I-15) FasTrak ® N/A N/A 2,002,030.40 2,002,030.40 - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - SANDAG SAFE Program Acct N/A N/A 93,060.77 93,060.77 - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - SourcePoint N/A N/A 244,006.80 244,006.80 - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - ARJIS N/A N/A 549,720.63 549,720.63 - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - State Route 125 (SR 125) Payment Account N/A N/A 2,452,923.57 2,452,923.57 - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - SR 125 Collection Account N/A N/A 140,398.82 140,398.82 - N/A NR NR N/A 1

Total demand deposits $ 7,440,713.99 $ 7,440,713.99 $ - N/A N/A 1

Money market accounts and funds: Money Market - Capital Project Retention Account N/A N/A $479,115.59 $ 479,115.59 $ - N/A NR NR 0.05% 1 Money Market - Capital Project Retention Account N/A N/A 1,425,992.43 1,425,992.43 - N/A NR NR 0.10% 1 Money Market - SANDAG Toll Road Project Revenue Fund N/A N/A 3,844,412.46 3,844,412.46 - N/A NR NR 0.10% 1 Money Market - SANDAG Toll Road Project Cap Exp Reserve N/A N/A 537,497.57 537,497.57 - N/A NR NR 0.10% 1 Money Market - SANDAG Toll Road Project TIFIA Note Expense N/A N/A 10,022.15 10,022.15 - N/A NR NR 0.10% 1 Money Market - SANDAG Toll Road Project Sr. Oblig. D/S - Interest N/A N/A 981,696.59 981,696.59 - N/A NR NR 0.10% 1 Money Market - SANDAG Toll Road Project Sr. Oblig. D/S - Princ. N/A N/A 97,244.47 97,244.47 - N/A NR NR 0.10% 1 Money Market - SANDAG Toll Road Project 1st Sub Obl TNet Pymt N/A N/A 562.89 562.89 - N/A NR NR 0.10% 1 Money Market - SANDAG Toll Road Project SANDAG Distribution N/A N/A 1, 001,383.46 1,001,383.46 - N/A NR NR 0.10% 1 San Diego County Treasurer's Pooled Money Fund (SourcePoint) N/A N/A 169,197.88 169,197.88 - N/A AAAf / S1 NR 0.98% 415 San Diego County Treasurer's Pooled Money Fund (RTC) N/A N/A 133,540,000.00 133,540,000.00 - N/A AAAf / S1 NR 0.98% 415 San Diego County Treasurer's Pooled Money Fund (I-15 FasTrak ®) N/A N/A 6,466,867.96 6,466,867.96 - N/A AAAf / S1 NR 0.98% 415 San Diego County Treasurer's Pooled Money Fund (RTC) N/A N/A 64,919,086.45 64,919,086.45 - N/A AAAf / S1 NR 0.98% 415 San Diego County Treasurer's Pooled Money Fund (ARJIS) N/A N/A 2,456,376.02 2,456,376.02 - N/A AAAf / S1 NR 0.98% 415 San Diego County Treasurer's Pooled Money Fund (SAFE) N/A N/A 8,313,859.21 8,313,859.21 - N/A AAAf / S1 NR 0.98% 415 Money Market - RTC (2008 Revenue Bond) N/A N/A 0.11 0.11 - N/A NR NR 0.00% 1 Money Market - RTC (2008 Bond - Main Interest) N/A N/A 1,395,695.08 1,395,695.08 - N/A NR NR 0.10% 1 Money Market - RTC (CP Series B - NCTD) N/A N/A 227,961.21 227,961.21 - N/A NR NR 0.10% 1 Money Market - RTC (2010 Revenue Bond - Series A Interest) N/A N/A 3,267,859.47 3,267,859.47 - N/A NR NR 0.10% 1 Money Market - RTC (2016 Revenue Bond - Series A COI) N/A N/A 247,229.29 247,229.29 N/A NR NR 0.10% 1 Money Market - RTC (CP Notes Ser B Interest) N/A N/A 332.03 332.03 - N/A NR NR 0.00% 1 Money Market - RTC (CP Ser B Principal) N/A N/A 218,539.44 218,539.44 - N/A NR NR 0.00% 1 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (ARJIS) N/A N/A 6, 691,227.55 6,691,227.55 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio - CA Coastal Commission N/A N/A 1, 162,147.50 1,162,147.50 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (SANDAG SR 125) N/A N/A 1,855,251.19 1,855,251.19 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (SANDAG SR 125) - Project Maint N/A N/A 20,900,047.06 20,900,047.06 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio - Coronado Bridge Toll Funds N/A N/A 274,352.51 274,352.51 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (SANDAG SR 125) - Extraordinary Reserve N/A N/A 3,916,261.86 3,916,261.86 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53

18 SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Investment Type) as of September 30, 2016

Wtd. Avg. Purchase Maturity Unrealized S&P Moody's Yield Days to Investment Date Date Book Value Market Value Gain / (Loss) Par Value Rating Rating on Cost Maturity

CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio - SANDAG Shoreline Management Account N/A N/A 161,901.92 161,901.92 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (I-15 FasTrak ®) N/A N/A 622,443.15 622,443.15 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2008 Bond Reserve N/A N/A 10,867,550.64 10,867,550.64 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2008 Bond Ser A Principal N/A N/A 1.00 1.00 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2008 Bond Ser B Principal N/A N/A 1.00 1.00 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2008 Bond Ser C Principal N/A N/A 1.00 1.00 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2008 Bond Ser D Principal N/A N/A 1.00 1.00 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2010 Bond Ser B Principal N/A N/A 223,475.91 223,475.91 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2010 Bond Ser B Interest N/A N/A 154,428.16 154,428.16 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2010 Bond Ser A Interest N/A N/A 10,036,478.17 10,036,478.17 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2012 Bond Interest N/A N/A 8,664,687.77 8,664,687.77 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2012 Bond Principal N/A N/A 5,419,728.13 5,419,728.13 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - Sales Tax N/A N/A 35, 485,902.58 35,485,902.58 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio - Wetland Mitigation (RTC) N/A N/A 292,335.09 292,335.09 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio - Sage Hill Endowment (RTC) N/A N/A 1,749.50 1,749.50 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2014 Bond Ser A Principal N/A N/A 1,532,224.84 1,532,224.84 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2014 Bond Ser A Interest N/A N/A 8,601,618.33 8,601,618.33 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2014 Bond Ser A Proj Del Mar N/A N/A 795,225.31 795,225.31 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2014 Bond Ser A Proj Santee N/A N/A 2,419,798.07 2,419,798.07 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2016 Bond Series A Project N/A N/A 11,453,921.71 11,453,921.71 - N/A AAAm NR 0.64% 53 BNY Mellon Cash Reserve TransNet Extension (RTC) N/A N/A 1,215,418.97 1,215,418.97 - N/A NR NR 0.00% 1

Total money market accounts and funds $ 362,349,111.68 $ 362,349,111.68 $ - N/A 0.82% 267

Total cash and cash equivalents $ 369,789,825.67 $ 369,789,825.67 $ - N/A N/A 261

Investments: State of CA Local Agency Investment Fund: LAIF - TransNet (RTC) N/A N/A $ 64,541,292.88 $ 64,541,292.88 $ - N/A NR NR 0.65% 165 LAIF - SANDAG N/A N/A 7,502,720.33 7,502,720.33 - N/A NR NR 0.65% 165

Total State of CA Local Agency Investment Fund $ 72,044,013.21 $ 72,044,013.21 $ - N/A 0.65% 165

U.S. Agencies: US TREASURY NOTES 11/09/2015 09/30/2017 $ 3,832,404.30 $ 3,848,194.35 $ 15,790.05 $ 3,850,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.87% 365 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS DISC NOTE 05/31/2016 03/30/2017 109,370.43 109,736.71 366.28 110,000.00 A-1+ P-1 0.68% 181 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS DISC NOTE 05/31/2016 03/30/2017 2,714,375.30 2,723,465.64 9,090.34 2,730,000.00 A-1+ P-1 0.68% 181 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS DISC NOTE 05/31/2016 03/30/2017 765,593.03 768,156.97 2,563.94 770,000.00 A-1+ P-1 0.68% 181 FHLMC NOTES 07/11/2014 10/14/2016 1,991,068.20 1,980,342.54 (10,725.66) 1,980,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.62% 14 FHLB NOTES 06/23/2015 11/23/2016 2,401,896.00 2,401,104.00 (792.00) 2,400,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.57% 54 FANNIE MAE GLOBAL NOTES 07/11/2014 01/30/2017 2,673,844.80 2,646,853.44 (26,991.36) 2,640,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.74% 122 FREDDIE MAC GLOBAL NOTES 06/17/2016 07/28/2017 1,505,415.00 1,504,656.00 (759.00) 1,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.67% 301 FANNIE MAE GLOBAL NOTES 06/17/2016 10/26/2017 1,503,960.00 1,502,458.50 (1,501.50) 1,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.68% 391 FANNIE MAE GLOBAL NOTES 06/17/2016 02/08/2018 1,504,530.00 1,502,007.00 (2,523.00) 1,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.69% 496 FNMA BENCHMARK NOTE 06/17/2016 10/19/2018 1,510,755.00 1,507,768.50 (2,986.50) 1,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.81% 749

19 SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Investment Type) as of September 30, 2016

Wtd. Avg. Purchase Maturity Unrealized S&P Moody's Yield Days to Investment Date Date Book Value Market Value Gain / (Loss) Par Value Rating Rating on Cost Maturity

FNMA BENCHMARK NOTE 06/17/2016 01/28/2019 1,521,135.00 1,516,570.50 (4,564.50) 1,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.83% 850 FANNIE MAE GLOBAL NOTES 07/11/2014 01/30/2017 2,638,135.60 2,611,762.58 (26,373.02) 2,605,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.74% 122 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS AGCY 06/17/2016 06/29/2018 500,850.00 501,922.00 1,072.00 500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.79% 637 FNMA NOTES 06/17/2016 07/20/2018 503,715.00 502,507.00 (1,208.00) 500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.77% 658 FNMA BENCHMARK NOTE 06/17/2016 10/19/2018 503,585.00 502,589.50 (995.50) 500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.81% 749 FNMA BENCHMARK NOTE 06/17/2016 01/28/2019 507,045.00 505,523.50 (1,521.50) 500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.83% 850 FHLMC NOTES 06/17/2016 03/27/2019 538,870.00 534,439.50 (4,430.50) 500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.90% 908 FREDDIE MAC NOTES 12/10/2015 05/30/2019 722,900.75 729,929.92 7,029.17 715,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.42% 972 US TREASURY NOTES 07/11/2014 06/30/2017 1,254,142.97 1,261,375.92 7,232.95 1,260,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.91% 273 FHLB NOTES 02/17/2016 03/19/2018 6,497,985.00 6,505,206.50 7,221.50 6,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.89% 535 FNMA NOTE 03/02/2016 03/28/2018 5,284,410.00 5,299,024.20 14,614.20 5,295,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.97% 544 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS AGCY 05/26/2016 06/29/2018 4,868,239.20 4,898,758.72 30,519.52 4,880,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.99% 637 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS AGCY 08/12/2016 06/29/2018 4,105,125.00 4,115,760.40 10,635.40 4,100,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.81% 637 FHLB NOTES 07/07/2016 08/07/2018 4,440,744.00 4,432,653.90 (8,090.10) 4,450,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.73% 676 FHLB GLOBAL NOTE 08/25/2016 10/01/2018 10,992,520.00 10,995,149.00 2,629.00 11,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.91% 731 FHLMC REFERENCE NOTE 09/15/2016 10/12/2018 5,092,809.15 5,092,656.30 (152.85) 5,095,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.90% 742 FNMA NOTES 03/02/2016 12/14/2018 8,009,200.00 8,038,376.00 29,176.00 8,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.08% 805 FNMA BENCHMARK NOTE 02/19/2016 02/26/2019 3,990,560.00 4,005,676.00 15,116.00 4,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.08% 879 FNMA BENCHMARK NOTE 05/03/2016 02/26/2019 2,086,920.43 2,087,958.62 1,038.19 2,085,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.97% 879 FNMA BENCHMARK NOTE 07/06/2016 02/26/2019 5,435,370.00 5,407,662.60 (27,707.40) 5,400,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.75% 879 FHLMC NOTES 03/02/2016 03/27/2019 2,156,300.00 2,137,758.00 (18,542.00) 2,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.15% 908 FHLB GLOBAL NOTE 06/02/2016 06/21/2019 12,604,703.80 12,662,369.33 57,665.53 12,610,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.14% 994 FHLMC REFERENCE NOTE 07/19/2016 07/19/2019 5,721,121.30 5,714,979.12 (6,142.18) 5,735,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.96% 1,022 FNMA BENCHMARK NOTE 07/29/2016 08/02/2019 6,529,012.80 6,514,572.48 (14,440.32) 6,540,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.93% 1,036 FNMA NOTES 08/31/2016 08/28/2019 7,887,676.00 7,896,366.00 8,690.00 7,900,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.05% 1,062 FNMA SERIES 01/15/2015 02/01/2018 867,071.67 861,574.14 (5,497.53) 858,493.18 AA+ Aaa 1.26% 489 FNMA SERIES 04/15/2015 04/01/2018 1,035,246.31 1,028,764.11 (6,482.20) 1,025,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.83% 548 FNMA SERIES 11/06/2015 01/01/2019 989,799.90 988,124.30 (1,675.60) 980,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.20% 823 FHLMC SERIES 04/15/2016 03/01/2019 1,472,006.57 1,468,942.44 (3,064.13) 1,457,443.79 AA+ Aaa 0.99% 882 FNMA SERIES 2 06/09/2016 06/01/2019 2,979,498.53 2,971,702.86 (7,795.67) 2,950,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.05% 974 FANNIE MAE SERIES 10/07/2015 09/01/2019 2,055,378.29 2,045,088.72 (10,289.57) 2,035,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.08% 1,066 US TREASURY NOTES 03/30/2015 12/31/2017 1,600,360.54 1,605,690.15 5,329.61 1,605,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.86% 457 US TREASURY NOTES 12/02/2015 09/15/2018 2,180,932.03 2,198,810.37 17,878.34 2,190,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.15% 715 US TREASURY NOTES 10/08/2015 09/30/2018 8,399,983.59 8,388,642.26 (11,341.33) 8,295,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.94% 730 US TREASURY NOTES 01/06/2016 12/31/2018 4,411,171.88 4,453,627.20 42,455.32 4,400,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.29% 822 US TREASURY NOTES 05/26/2016 04/15/2019 497,890.62 500,332.00 2,441.38 500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.02% 927 US TREASURY NOTES 06/27/2016 04/30/2019 8,617,546.87 8,562,750.00 (54,796.87) 8,400,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.70% 942 FHLB NOTES 10/16/2015 10/26/2017 824,043.00 824,264.93 221.93 825,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.68% 391 FREDDIE MAC 09/23/2015 11/17/2017 4,968,054.00 4,771,148.20 (196,905.80) 4,550,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.78% 413 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/09/2015 09/14/2018 5,017,550.00 5,021,880.00 4,330.00 5,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.00% 714 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/21/2015 09/14/2018 3,015,210.00 3,013,128.00 (2,082.00) 3,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.95% 714 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/21/2015 09/14/2018 1,256,400.00 1,255,470.00 (930.00) 1,250,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.94% 714

20 SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Investment Type) as of September 30, 2016

Wtd. Avg. Purchase Maturity Unrealized S&P Moody's Yield Days to Investment Date Date Book Value Market Value Gain / (Loss) Par Value Rating Rating on Cost Maturity

FANNIE MAE (CALLABLE) 10/20/2015 02/25/2019 4,024,800.00 4,032,120.00 7,320.00 4,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.11% 878 FARMER MAC 01/22/2013 01/24/2018 2,499,375.00 2,501,400.00 2,025.00 2,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.94% 481 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 08/31/2015 01/30/2019 4,004,520.00 4,033,560.00 29,040.00 4,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.29% 852 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/26/2015 05/21/2018 4,989,850.00 5,010,750.00 20,900.00 5,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.07% 598 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 04/21/2014 12/09/2016 5,625,180.00 5,512,853.50 (112,326.50) 5,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.75% 70 FREDDIE MAC 01/28/2013 01/12/2018 4,931,800.00 4,998,525.00 66,725.00 5,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.03% 469 FREDDIE MAC (CALLABLE) 02/25/2013 02/07/2018 2,470,712.00 2,471,767.65 1,055.65 2,455,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.35% 495 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/12/2014 12/08/2017 2,002,160.00 2,009,140.00 6,980.00 2,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.09% 434 FANNIE MAE (CALLABLE) 11/27/2012 09/20/2017 3,508,400.00 3,509,058.00 658.00 3,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.00% 355 FANNIE MAE 12/04/2012 09/20/2017 1,002,750.00 1,002,588.00 (162.00) 1,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.00% 355 FANNIE MAE (CALLABLE) 02/25/2013 09/20/2017 4,004,000.00 4,010,352.00 6,352.00 4,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.00% 355 FREDDIE MAC (CALLABLE) 04/25/2016 01/28/2019 4,993,250.00 5,000,550.00 7,300.00 5,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.20% 850 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 08/20/2015 10/30/2018 4,994,550.00 5,017,050.00 22,500.00 5,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.16% 760 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/08/2013 03/10/2017 3,183,360.00 3,205,888.00 22,528.00 3,200,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.03% 161 FANNIE MAE 11/12/2015 10/26/2017 2,997,900.00 3,004,917.00 7,017.00 3,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.91% 391 FREDDIE MAC 05/25/2016 04/15/2019 6,994,820.00 7,031,087.00 36,267.00 7,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.15% 927 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 04/22/2016 03/08/2019 5,057,500.00 5,065,350.00 7,850.00 5,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.09% 889 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/11/2015 06/01/2018 4,983,750.00 5,019,250.00 35,500.00 5,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.21% 609 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/15/2015 12/11/2017 4,491,585.00 4,505,625.00 14,040.00 4,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.98% 437 FREDDIE MAC (CALLABLE) 03/23/2015 12/29/2017 5,000,000.00 5,015,850.00 15,850.00 5,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.05% 455 FREDDIE MAC (CALLABLE) 04/22/2016 10/28/2019 5,000,000.00 5,004,800.00 4,800.00 5,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.25% 1,123 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/15/2013 03/09/2018 254,980.00 252,037.50 (2,942.50) 250,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.96% 525 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/10/2015 03/09/2018 2,012,440.00 2,016,300.00 3,860.00 2,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.14% 525 FANNIE MAE 05/26/2015 11/27/2018 5,576,230.00 5,588,847.00 12,617.00 5,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.22% 788 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK (CALLABLE) 05/09/2016 05/16/2019 5,500,000.00 5,499,945.00 (55.00) 5,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.17% 958 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 09/23/2015 08/28/2017 4,001,760.00 4,004,760.00 3,000.00 4,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.76% 332 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 09/24/2015 04/24/2018 4,010,720.00 4,010,440.00 (280.00) 4,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.89% 571 FANNIE MAE 02/15/2013 02/08/2018 1,989,480.00 2,002,676.00 13,196.00 2,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.98% 496 USA TREASURY 01/11/2016 07/31/2018 4,529,003.91 4,548,690.00 19,686.09 4,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.12% 669 USA TREASURY 03/27/2015 06/30/2017 2,502,734.38 2,502,730.00 (4.38) 2,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.70% 273 USA TREASURY 11/02/2015 06/30/2017 1,755,126.95 1,751,911.00 (3,215.95) 1,750,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.57% 273 USA TREASURY 06/11/2015 01/31/2019 4,974,218.75 5,048,635.00 74,416.25 5,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.40% 853 USA TREASURY 06/15/2015 06/15/2018 4,996,093.75 5,031,055.00 34,961.25 5,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.15% 623 USA TREASURY 06/06/2014 03/31/2017 3,020,625.00 3,007,506.00 (13,119.00) 3,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.75% 182 USA TREASURY 12/18/2015 03/31/2017 2,504,101.56 2,506,255.00 2,153.44 2,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.87% 182

Total U.S. Agencies $ 309,482,208.16 $ 309,660,499.57 $ 178,291.41 $ 308,125,937 0.99% 671

Corporate Medium Term Notes: Chevron Corp Note 08/18/2016 11/15/2017 $ 5,324,062.00 $ 5,310,870.30 $ (13,191.70) $ 5,300,000.00 AA- Aa2 0.97% 411 Chevron Corp (Callable) Global Notes 08/17/2016 12/05/2017 1,742,862.87 1,739,732.55 (3,130.32) 1,741,000.00 AA- Aa2 1.02% 431 IBM Corp Notes 08/18/2016 02/06/2018 7,124,637.00 7,099,069.90 (25,567.10) 7,100,000.00 AA- Aa3 0.88% 494 Exxon Mobil Corp Notes 08/17/2016 03/01/2018 2,718,549.00 2,711,286.00 (7,263.00) 2,700,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.98% 517

21 SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Investment Type) as of September 30, 2016

Wtd. Avg. Purchase Maturity Unrealized S&P Moody's Yield Days to Investment Date Date Book Value Market Value Gain / (Loss) Par Value Rating Rating on Cost Maturity

Exxon Mobil Corp Notes 08/19/2016 03/01/2018 1,006,970.00 1,004,180.00 (2,790.00) 1,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.98% 517 Exxon Mobil Corp Notes 08/24/2016 03/01/2018 3,424,582.00 3,414,212.00 (10,370.00) 3,400,000.00 AA+ Aaa 0.95% 517 Coca-Cola Co Global Note 08/24/2016 04/01/2018 7,120,093.00 7,107,511.80 (12,581.20) 7,100,000.00 AA- Aa3 0.97% 548 Caterpillar Financial SE 06/17/2016 08/18/2017 1,504,800.00 1,502,140.50 (2,659.50) 1,500,000.00 A A2 0.97% 322 Wells Fargo & Company Corp Notes 06/17/2016 09/08/2017 1,506,030.00 1,499,550.00 (6,480.00) 1,500,000.00 A A2 1.07% 343 Merck & Co Inc Corp Notes 06/17/2016 01/31/2018 1,505,910.00 1,501,561.50 (4,348.50) 1,500,000.00 AA A1 0.85% 488 JP Morgan Chase Corp Notes (Callable) 06/17/2016 03/01/2018 1,507,110.00 1,504,566.00 (2,544.00) 1,500,000.00 A- A3 1.42% 517 Coca-Cola Co Global Note 06/17/2016 04/01/2018 1,507,590.00 1,501,587.00 (6,003.00) 1,500,000.00 AA- Aa3 0.86% 548 Microsoft Corp Notes 06/17/2016 11/03/2018 1,509,285.00 1,507,320.00 (1,965.00) 1,500,000.00 AAA Aaa 1.03% 764 Wal-Mart Stores Inc 06/17/2016 12/15/2018 1,537,620.00 1,527,735.00 (9,885.00) 1,500,000.00 AA Aa2 0.93% 806 Wells Fargo & Company Corp Notes 06/17/2016 09/08/2017 502,010.00 499,850.00 (2,160.00) 500,000.00 A A2 1.07% 343 Merck & Co Inc Corp Notes 06/17/2016 01/31/2018 501,970.00 500,520.50 (1,449.50) 500,000.00 AA A1 0.85% 488 JP Morgan Chase Corp Notes (Callable) 06/17/2016 03/01/2018 502,370.00 501,522.00 (848.00) 500,000.00 A- A3 1.42% 517 The Walt Disney Corp 06/17/2016 09/17/2018 506,355.00 503,905.00 (2,450.00) 500,000.00 A A2 0.92% 717 US Bancorp (Callable) 11/24/2014 05/15/2017 3,238,688.00 3,209,318.40 (29,369.60) 3,200,000.00 A+ A1 1.15% 227 Toyota Motor Credit Corp Note 01/07/2015 01/12/2018 299,589.00 301,124.70 1,535.70 300,000.00 AA- Aa3 1.50% 469 Toyota Motor Credit Corp Note 03/30/2015 01/12/2018 2,515,650.00 2,509,372.50 (6,277.50) 2,500,000.00 AA- Aa3 1.22% 469 JP Morgan Chase & Co Notes 02/05/2016 01/15/2018 1,444,667.40 1,415,730.10 (28,937.30) 1,340,000.00 A- A3 1.86% 472 Wachovia Corp Notes 03/30/2015 02/01/2018 3,916,850.00 3,698,033.50 (218,816.50) 3,500,000.00 A A2 1.44% 489 IBM Corp Notes 02/03/2015 02/06/2018 4,237,037.50 4,249,443.25 12,405.75 4,250,000.00 AA- Aa3 1.23% 494 Exxon Mobil Corp Notes 03/04/2015 03/06/2018 3,450,000.00 3,460,439.70 10,439.70 3,450,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.31% 522 American Honda Finance Corp Notes 03/10/2015 03/13/2018 2,531,603.10 2,545,426.46 13,823.36 2,535,000.00 A+ A1 1.55% 529 PepsiCo, Inc Corp Notes 04/27/2015 04/30/2018 714,914.20 716,548.69 1,634.49 715,000.00 A A1 1.25% 577 Bank Of New York Mellon Corp (Callable) 05/22/2015 05/22/2018 4,424,601.75 4,451,381.85 26,780.10 4,425,000.00 A A1 1.60% 599 Cisco Systems Inc Corp Note 06/10/2015 06/15/2018 4,769,189.10 4,809,156.93 39,967.83 4,770,000.00 AA- A1 1.66% 623 Toyota Motor Credit Corp 07/08/2015 07/13/2018 829,294.50 834,491.13 5,196.63 830,000.00 AA- Aa3 1.58% 651 American Express Crd Crp Nt (Callable) 02/05/2016 07/31/2018 3,496,290.00 3,520,422.50 24,132.50 3,500,000.00 A- A2 1.84% 669 John Deere Capital Corp Note 09/08/2015 08/10/2018 3,736,334.80 3,774,310.76 37,975.96 3,740,000.00 A A2 1.79% 679 American Exp Credit Corp Nt (Callable) 10/29/2015 11/05/2018 1,059,904.60 1,068,663.38 8,758.78 1,060,000.00 A- A2 1.88% 766 John Deere Capital Corp Note 01/05/2016 01/08/2019 949,943.00 965,653.15 15,710.15 950,000.00 A A2 1.95% 830 Toyota Motor Credit Corp 02/16/2016 02/19/2019 699,916.00 705,460.70 5,544.70 700,000.00 AA- Aa3 1.70% 872 American Honda Finance Corp Notes 02/18/2016 02/22/2019 1,144,771.00 1,154,740.52 9,969.52 1,145,000.00 A+ A1 1.71% 875 Berkshire Hathaway Inc Notes 03/08/2016 03/15/2019 839,361.60 847,708.68 8,347.08 840,000.00 AA Aa2 1.73% 896 Berkshire Hathaway Inc Corporate Notes 08/08/2016 08/15/2019 959,068.80 961,621.44 2,552.64 960,000.00 AA Aa2 1.33% 1,049 Caterpillar Finl Service 08/31/2015 05/18/2019 2,243,091.20 2,237,789.12 (5,302.08) 2,240,000.00 A A 1.30% 960 Berkshire Hathaway Fin 06/11/2015 08/15/2018 5,081,575.00 5,071,765.00 (9,810.00) 5,000,000.00 AA Aa 1.47% 684 Wells Fargo & Company 07/20/2015 09/08/2017 4,008,120.00 3,998,800.00 (9,320.00) 4,000,000.00 A A 1.30% 343 Wal-Mart Stores Inc 04/11/2013 04/11/2018 500,215.00 501,073.00 858.00 500,000.00 AA Aa 1.12% 558 Wal-Mart Stores Inc 09/18/2015 04/11/2018 1,798,470.00 1,803,862.80 5,392.80 1,800,000.00 AA Aa 1.16% 558 Caterpillar Finl Service 11/13/2015 11/13/2018 2,006,560.00 2,017,520.00 10,960.00 2,000,000.00 A A 1.69% 774 Toyota Motor Credit Corp 10/01/2013 01/12/2017 5,420,084.60 5,296,584.72 (123,499.88) 5,285,000.00 AA- Aa 1.25% 104 IBM Corp 02/04/2015 02/06/2018 2,993,400.00 2,999,607.00 6,207.00 3,000,000.00 AA- Aa 1.20% 494

22 SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Investment Type) as of September 30, 2016

Wtd. Avg. Purchase Maturity Unrealized S&P Moody's Yield Days to Investment Date Date Book Value Market Value Gain / (Loss) Par Value Rating Rating on Cost Maturity

Exxon Mobil Corporation (Callable) 08/04/2016 03/15/2019 8,142,400.00 8,101,128.00 (41,272.00) 8,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 1.12% 896 American Express Credit 09/30/2014 06/05/2017 4,970,500.00 4,997,525.00 27,025.00 5,000,000.00 A- A 1.35% 248 Pfizer Inc 06/20/2016 06/03/2019 4,012,200.00 4,023,704.00 11,504.00 4,000,000.00 AA A 1.34% 976 Pfizer Inc 06/20/2016 06/03/2019 2,006,100.00 2,011,852.00 5,752.00 2,000,000.00 AA A 1.34% 976 Apple Inc 07/31/2013 05/03/2018 1,925,040.00 1,997,212.00 72,172.00 2,000,000.00 AA+ Aa 1.83% 580 Apple Inc 05/22/2014 05/05/2017 3,011,340.00 3,003,600.00 (7,740.00) 3,000,000.00 AA+ Aa 0.92% 217 Microsoft Corp 07/06/2015 12/06/2018 5,060,450.00 5,061,170.00 720.00 5,000,000.00 AAA Aaa 1.26% 797 IBM Corp 01/30/2014 09/14/2017 3,107,673.00 2,817,641.70 (290,031.30) 2,700,000.00 AA- Aa 1.40% 349 PepsiCo Inc 02/13/2013 08/13/2017 3,004,200.00 3,006,348.00 2,148.00 3,000,000.00 A A 1.22% 317

Total Corporate Medium Notes $ 145,601,899.02 $ 145,083,350.73 $ (518,548.29) $ 144,076,000.00 1.28% 559

Commercial Paper: JP Morgan Securities LLC Comm Paper 08/08/2016 03/31/2017 844,696.00 846,055.15 1,359.15 850,000.00 A-1 P-1 0.97% 182 Toyota Motor Credit Corp Comm Paper 08/04/2016 03/31/2017 844,099.58 845,517.95 1,418.37 850,000.00 A-1+ P-1 1.06% 182 US Bank NA Comm Paper 08/08/2016 03/31/2017 845,524.75 846,184.35 659.60 850,000.00 A-1+ P-1 0.81% 182 Credit Agricole CIB NY Comm Paper 08/17/2016 02/13/2017 17,395,583.33 17,431,242.50 35,659.17 17,500,000.00 A-1 P-1 1.21% 136 ING (US) Funding LLC Comm Paper 08/17/2016 02/13/2017 17,396,453.47 17,431,977.50 35,524.03 17,500,000.00 A-1 P-1 1.20% 136 Bank Of Tokyo Mitsubishi Comm Paper 08/17/2016 02/17/2017 17,394,455.56 17,426,710.00 32,254.44 17,500,000.00 A-1 P-1 1.19% 140 Bank Of Montreal Chicago Comm Paper 08/17/2016 05/12/2017 17,339,250.70 17,374,455.00 35,204.30 17,500,000.00 A-1 P-1 1.25% 224 BNP Paribas NY Branch Comm Paper 08/17/2016 05/12/2017 17,321,519.44 17,361,277.50 39,758.06 17,500,000.00 A-1 P-1 1.38% 224 Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A. Comm Paper 08/17/2016 05/12/2017 17,336,462.50 17,370,535.00 34,072.50 17,500,000.00 A-1 P-1 1.27% 224 Toyota Motor Credit Corp Comm Paper 08/17/2016 05/12/2017 17,354,633.33 17,377,710.00 23,076.67 17,500,000.00 A-1+ P-1 1.13% 224 US Bank NA Comm Paper 08/17/2016 05/12/2017 17,389,677.08 17,389,050.00 (627.08) 17,500,000.00 A-1+ P-1 0.86% 224 JP Morgan Securities LLC Comm Paper 08/18/2016 05/15/2017 17,358,250.00 17,383,800.00 25,550.00 17,500,000.00 A-1 P-1 1.09% 227 Toyota Motor Credit Corp Comm Paper 08/04/2016 03/31/2017 1,946,394.33 1,949,664.92 3,270.59 1,960,000.00 A-1+ P-1 1.06% 182 Toyota Motor Credit Corp Comm Paper 08/04/2016 03/31/2017 729,897.87 731,124.35 1,226.48 735,000.00 A-1+ P-1 1.06% 182

Total Commercial Paper $ 161,496,897.94 $ 161,765,304.22 $ 268,406.28 $ 162,745,000.00 1.17% 195

Municipal Bonds/Notes: MS ST TXBL GO BONDS 02/04/2015 10/01/2017 $ 230,000.00 $ 230,480.70 $ 480.70 $ 230,000.00 AA Aa2 1.09% 366

Total Municipal Bonds/Notes $ 230,000.00 $ 230,480.70 $ 480.70 $ 230,000.00 1.09% 366

Certificates of Deposits: Svenska Handelsbanken NY Flt Cert Depos 11/20/2015 08/24/2017 $ 5,000,000.00 $ 5,011,350.00 $ 11,350.00 $ 5,000,000.00 A-1+ P-1 0.84% 328 HSBC Bank USA NA Floating Cert Depos 11/17/2015 11/17/2017 5,540,000.00 5,552,520.40 12,520.40 5,540,000.00 A-1+ P-1 0.97% 413 BMO Harris Bank NA CD 10/22/2015 04/24/2017 5,540,000.00 5,549,490.02 9,490.02 5,540,000.00 A-1 Aa3 1.01% 206 Nordea Bank Finland NY CD 05/27/2015 05/26/2017 4,320,000.00 4,318,012.80 (1,987.20) 4,320,000.00 AA- Aa3 1.15% 238 US Bank NA Cincinnati (Callable) CD 09/09/2014 09/11/2017 2,790,500.05 2,804,776.91 14,276.86 2,795,000.00 AA- Aa1 1.41% 346 Bank Of Nova Scotia Houston YCD 11/06/2015 11/06/2017 5,540,000.00 5,558,475.90 18,475.90 5,540,000.00 A-1 P-1 1.55% 402

23 SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Investment Type) as of September 30, 2016

Wtd. Avg. Purchase Maturity Unrealized S&P Moody's Yield Days to Investment Date Date Book Value Market Value Gain / (Loss) Par Value Rating Rating on Cost Maturity

Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken NY CD 11/16/2015 11/16/2017 5,500,000.00 5,508,250.00 8,250.00 5,500,000.00 A-1 P-1 1.48% 412 Royal Bank Of Canada NY CD 03/11/2016 03/09/2018 3,325,000.00 3,340,710.63 15,710.63 3,325,000.00 AA- Aa3 1.69% 525 Toronto Dominion Bank NY CD 03/14/2016 03/14/2018 2,560,000.00 2,564,249.60 4,249.60 2,560,000.00 AA- Aa1 1.72% 530

Total Certificates of Deposits $ 40,115,500.05 $ 40,207,836.26 $ 92,336.21 $ 40,120,000.00 1.27% 365

Asset-Backed Security: Toyota ABS 02/24/2015 07/15/2017 $ 21,113.21 $ 21,111.11 $ (2.10) $ 21,113.41 AAA Aaa 0.71% 288 CNH ABS 09/13/2016 02/18/2020 1,284,883.07 1,285,601.77 718.70 1,285,000.00 AAA Aaa 1.27% 1,236 Toyota ABS 02/23/2016 03/15/2020 1,579,910.41 1,583,562.90 3,652.49 1,580,000.00 AAA Aaa 1.25% 1,262 Toyota ABS 08/01/2016 08/15/2020 659,982.31 658,800.58 (1,181.73) 660,000.00 AAA Aaa 1.14% 1,415 Hyundai ABS 03/22/2016 09/15/2020 659,871.96 664,580.40 4,708.44 660,000.00 AAA Aaa 1.57% 1,446 Nissan ABS 04/18/2016 01/15/2021 494,923.23 496,979.85 2,056.62 495,000.00 NR Aaa 1.33% 1,568 Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 09/14/2016 04/15/2021 1,099,851.94 1,101,431.43 1,579.49 1,100,000.00 AAA Aaa 1.30% 1,658 USAA Auto Owner Trust USA 10/20/2014 12/15/2017 8,280.54 8,277.59 (2.95) 8,278.60 AAA Aaa 0.55% 441

Total Asset-Backed Security $ 5,808,816.67 $ 5,820,345.63 $ 11,528.96 $ 5,809,392.01 1.29% 1,391

Certificates of Participation: North County Transit District Certificates of Participation 09/15/2016 10/13/2016 $ 26,750,000.00 $ 26,750,000.00 $ - $ 26,750,000.00 NR A1 0.76% 13

Total Certificates of Participation $ 26,750,000.00 $ 26,750,000.00 $ - $ 26,750,000.00 0.76% 13

Total investments $ 761,529,335.05 $ 761,561,830.32 $ 32,495.27 N/A 1.07% 466

Total Portfolio: $ 1,131,319,160.72 $ 1,131,351,655.99 $ 32,495.27 N/A 0.98% 399

Legend: Automated Regional Justice Information System (ARJIS) Commercial Paper (CP) State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) North County Transit District (NCTD) San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission (RTC)

24 AGENDA ITEM NO. 16-11-7 BOARD OF DIRECTORS NOVEMBER 18, 2016 ACTION REQUESTED – INFORMATION

QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT ON TRANSPORTATION File Number 1500000 PROJECTS – JULY THROUGH SEPTEMBER 2016

Introduction

This quarterly report summarizes the status of major transit, highway, traffic management, and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) projects in the SANDAG five-year Regional Transportation Improvement Program. The TransNet one-half cent local sales tax and other local, state, and federal revenue sources fund these projects. The projects contained in this report have been prioritized and are included in San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan. All information shown in bold has changed from the previous quarter; this report will highlight some of those changes. This item is presented to the Board of Directors for information.

Discussion

TransNet Program

Attachment 1 – TransNet Extension Quarterly Report – indicates sales tax revenue available for allocation was approximately $70.3 million in the first quarter of FY 2017. Revenue for this quarter of the fiscal year was 5.7 percent higher compared to the fourth quarter of FY 2016 ($66.5 million). In contrast with the annual trend, TransNet revenue in the first quarter of this fiscal year was approximately 1.2 percent higher than the first quarter of last fiscal year ($69.5 million).

Transit Projects

Attachment 2 – Transit Projects – provides cost and schedule information on the major transit and rail projects in the San Diego region. The accompanying map (Attachment 3 – Major Transit Projects) locates these projects.

Mid-Coast Light Rail Transit (Project No. 6): A groundbreaking celebration held on October 22, 2016, marked the beginning of construction of the Mid-Coast Trolley. The Mid-Coast Trolley will extend light rail service from the Santa Fe Depot in Downtown San Diego to the University City community, serving major activity centers such as Old Town, UC San Diego, several hospitals, and Westfield UTC.

San Diego River Bridge (Project No. 17): On September 23, 2016, the Board of Directors unanimously approved fully funding the San Diego River Bridge Double Track project. This project will add a second main track from Tecolote Road to just north of the Old Town Transit Center. The new 0.9-mile track will connect to existing double track at each end, resulting in a continuous seven-mile double track segment for the southernmost portion of the Los Angeles-San Diego- San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor from Balboa Avenue to the Santa Fe Depot. The project, currently in construction, will be completed in 2019.

Active Transportation Projects

Attachment 4 – Active Transportation Projects (includes projects related to bicycle, pedestrian, and access to transit infrastructure) – provides cost and schedule information on the Active Transportation projects in the San Diego region. The accompanying map (Attachment 5 – Major Active Transportation Projects) locates these projects.

Inland Rail Trail (Projects No. 33 & 34): The construction of Phase 1 of the Inland Rail Trail, a mile-long segment of Class 1 bikeway in the City of San Marcos, is anticipated to be completed in fall 2016. Phases 2, 4, and a portion of 3, consisting of approximately four miles in the cities of Vista and Oceanside and through an unincorporated portion of the County of San Diego, are anticipated to begin construction in spring 2017 and be completed in summer 2018.

Bayshore Bikeway Segments 4B & 5 (Project No. 35): The Bayshore Bikeway Segment 5 was advertised for construction in September 2016. Once completed, Segments 4B and 5 will add 2.2 miles of bikeways in National City between the San Diego/National City border and the east end of 32nd Street near the Pier 32 Marina. Bayshore Bikeway Segment 8B Main Street to Palomar (Project No. 36): The Mitigated Negative Declaration was completed and circulated to the public in July 2016. Bayshore Bikeway 8B consists of approximately 0.3 miles of new Class 1 bikeway in Chula Vista between Palomar Street and Ada Avenue along Bay Boulevard. This project extends the existing Bayshore Bikeway (Segment 8A), which currently terminates at Palomar Street. The bikeway alignment will be designed over an existing drainage ditch and just east of an existing railroad. The improvements will include surface improvements, drainage structures, retaining walls, bike lane striping, minor grading, fencing, relocation of existing utilities, lighting, and other improvements.

Express/High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes and Direct Access Ramp Projects

Attachment 6 – Express/High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes and Direct Access Ramp (DAR) Projects – provides cost and schedule information on the major Express/HOV and DAR projects in the San Diego region. The accompanying map (Attachment 7 – Express/HOV lanes and DAR Projects) locates these projects.

I-5/Gilman Drive Bridge (Project No. 62): The notice to proceed with the construction of the new bridge crossing over Interstate 5 (I-5) was issued in September 2016. The new bridge, located north of the La Jolla Village Drive bridge and south of the Voigt Drive bridge, would expand connectivity of the UC San Diego transportation system between Gilman Drive and Medical Center Drive South, providing a necessary and direct link for pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle traffic between the main campus and the medical research and teaching facilities located on the east campus. Bridge construction is anticipated to be completed in 2018.

2 Highway Projects

Attachment 8 – Highway Projects – provides cost and schedule information on the major highway projects in the San Diego region. The accompanying map (Attachment 9 – Major Highway Projects) locates these projects.

SR 905/125/11 Northbound Connectors (Project No. 75) The SR 905/125/11 Northbound Connectors project currently is under construction, and expected to open to the public in late 2016. This project will construct northbound connectors to State Route 125 (SR 125) from eastbound State Route 905 (SR 905), westbound SR 905, and westbound State Route 11 (SR 11). The interchange is one of the last critical links in the overall border road network, providing direct access to SR 125 from SR 905 and SR 11. The connectors also will link to the future Otay Mesa East/Mesa de Otay II Port of Entry via SR 11 once it is constructed.

Transportation Demand Management iCommute Program: iCommute is the TDM division of SANDAG and promotes the use of transportation alternatives by providing services such as online trip planning and ridematching, the SANDAG Regional Vanpool Program, employer and community outreach, bicycle encouragement programs, and a Guaranteed Ride Home service.

SANDAG Regional Vanpool Program: This program provides commuters with a cost-effective alternative to driving alone. The first quarter ended with 721 vanpools and over 5,400 vanpool program participants. Participants in the regional vanpool program reduced more than 34 million vehicle miles, prevented approximately 32 million pounds of carbon dioxide emissions, and saved about 1.6 million gallons of gasoline during the first quarter.

Employer Outreach: iCommute works with employers throughout the region to develop and implement commuter programs that encourage their employees to carpool, vanpool, bike or walk to work, take transit, or telework. At the end of the first quarter, 112 employers were actively engaged in the iCommute employer services program.

Bike Encouragement Program: This program supports the regional bike network and facilitates commuting by bike by providing services such as Bike Month and Bike to Work Day events, the Regional Bike Parking Program, and the San Diego Regional Bike Map. Currently iCommute provides access to secure bike parking at over 60 transit stations and Park & Ride lots throughout the region. During the first quarter of FY 2017, membership in the Regional Bike Parking Program increased to 667 commuters.

Guaranteed Ride Home: This service provides commuters who carpool, vanpool, take transit, walk, or bike to work, a free ride home from work in the event of an emergency, illness, or unscheduled overtime. At the end of the first quarter, 873 commuters were enrolled in Guaranteed Ride Home.

511 Services: The 511 application provides real-time access to traveler information and is led by SANDAG in partnership with the California Highway Patrol, Caltrans, Metropolitan Transit System and North County Transit District (NCTD). 511 is a free phone and web service that consolidates San Diego’s regional transportation information into a one-stop resource and provides up-to-the minute information on traffic conditions; incidents and driving times; schedule, route, and fare

3 information for public transportation; carpool and vanpool referrals; bicycling information; current toll rates for the Interstate15 Express Lanes and South Bay Expressway; and more. Future updates to the application will include transit arrival times, NCTD transit information, and a My511sd feature, which will allow users to program their route(s) to receive customized alerts at their chosen travel time.

During the first quarter of FY 2017, 511 received approximately 58,675 calls while the 511 web portal page (www.511sd.com) received approximately 103,814 total page views. The 511 service continues to be utilized as a one-stop resource that consolidates San Diego region transportation information into easily accessible phone and website systems.

Freeway Service Patrol

Attachment 10 – Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) Assists Map – summarizes the number of assists by the FSP. The San Diego region has 23 FSP tow trucks which patrol approximately 222 miles of San Diego freeways. These FSP trucks operate during weekday peak periods from 5:30 to 9:30 a.m. and from 2:30 to 6:30 p.m., excluding holidays. An additional 12 tow trucks patrol approximately 212 miles during extended service during midday from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. and weekends from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

In addition, eight roving trucks supplement the peak tow patrol for an additional 160 miles, which overlap peak tow beats and three supplementary FSP trucks patrol Caltrans construction sites as part of the Caltrans Transportation Management Plan. During the first quarter of FY 2017, this program provided approximately 24,019 assists, an increase of approximately 4.5 percent over last quarter (22,975 assists), which includes approximately 2,872 assists during weekend beats in the San Diego region.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachments: 1. TransNet Extension Quarterly Report 2. Transit Projects 3. Major Transit Projects (map) 4. Active Transportation Projects 5. Major Active Transportation Projects (map) 6. Express/HOV Lanes and DAR Projects 7. Major Express/HOV Lanes and DAR Projects (map) 8. Highway Projects 9. Major Highway Projects (map) 10. Freeway Service Patrol Assists (map)

Key Staff Contact: Asitha Seneviratne, [email protected]

4 Attachment 1 TransNet EXTENSION QUARTERLY REPORT

FISCAL YEAR: FY 2017 QUARTER:1

TransNet Allocations Fund Disbursements

2 Sales Tax Allocations Other Total Program Disbursements Debt Service3 Total Income 1 Allocation Disbursements

PROGRAM & RECIPIENT This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date Program to Date Program to Date This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date Program to Date SANDAG Admin $703,374 $703,374 $20,064,483 $142,302 $20,206,785 $(785,000) $(785,000) $(19,861,548) $0 $0 $0 $(19,861,548)

ITOC $0 $0 $1,730,878 $22,388 $1,753,266 $(48,324) $(48,324) $(1,521,257) $0 $0 $0 $(1,521,257)

Bicycle/Pedestrian/Neighborhood Safety $1,406,748 $1,406,748 $40,128,966 $3,647,951 $43,776,917 $(975,065) $(975,065) $(36,421,440) $0 $0 $0 $(36,421,440)

Major Corridor Capital Projects $25,926,364 $25,926,364 $738,919,108 $(65,359,282) $673,559,826 $(5,033,489) $(5,033,489) $(1,795,571,877) $(60,838,806) $(60,838,806) $(585,245,569) $(2,380,817,446)

Major Corridor Project EMP $3,002,000 $3,002,000 $85,559,055 $10,676,135 $96,235,190 $(1,176,606) $(1,176,606) $(205,198,106) $(8,916,053) $(8,916,053) $(136,671,226) $(341,869,332)

Local Project EMP $1,228,091 $1,228,091 $35,001,431 $891,337 $35,892,768 $(457) $(457) $(8,437,921) $0 $0 $0 $(8,437,921)

Smart Growth Incentive Program $1,432,773 $1,432,773 $40,835,003 $939,347 $41,774,350 $(533) $(533) $(18,446,401) $0 $0 $0 $(18,446,401)

Local Streets and Roads

City of Carlsbad $698,214 $698,214 $19,656,400 $8,162,709 $27,819,109 $(258) $(258) $(10,743,805) $0 $0 $0 $(10,743,805)

City of Chula Vista $1,446,517 $1,446,517 $39,417,974 $4,196,263 $43,614,237 $(393,852) $(393,852) $(30,838,858) $0 $0 $0 $(30,838,858)

City of Coronado $144,391 $144,391 $4,195,624 $826,216 $5,021,840 $(200,050) $(200,050) $(3,985,150) $0 $0 $0 $(3,985,150)

City of Del Mar $49,006 $49,006 $1,522,533 $163,417 $1,685,950 $(14) $(14) $(4,002,273) $(49,305) $(49,305) $(1,097,121) $(5,099,394)

City of El Cajon $588,831 $588,831 $16,803,251 $2,288,179 $19,091,430 $(35,217) $(35,217) $(15,783,787) $0 $0 $0 $(15,783,787)

City of Encinitas $401,936 $401,936 $11,763,808 $3,574,839 $15,338,647 $(147) $(147) $(10,340,006) $0 $0 $0 $(10,340,006)

City of Escondido $865,844 $865,844 $24,749,773 $4,885,814 $29,635,587 $(321) $(321) $(16,757,265) $0 $0 $0 $(16,757,265)

City of Imperial Beach $169,873 $169,873 $5,040,220 $554,525 $5,594,745 $(52,109) $(52,109) $(5,136,828) $0 $0 $0 $(5,136,828)

City of La Mesa $381,827 $381,827 $10,905,969 $3,260,938 $14,166,907 $(139) $(139) $(13,535,981) $(131,603) $(131,603) $(2,287,232) $(15,823,213)

City of Lemon Grove $174,931 $174,931 $5,039,961 $573,242 $5,613,203 $(61) $(61) $(3,594,938) $0 $0 $0 $(3,594,938)

City of National City $341,831 $341,831 $9,809,903 $1,122,279 $10,932,182 $(124) $(124) $(11,234,535) $(94,931) $(94,931) $(6,905,967) $(18,140,502)

City of Oceanside $1,118,640 $1,118,640 $32,450,568 $8,416,809 $40,867,377 $(416) $(416) $(28,977,652) $0 $0 $0 $(28,977,652)

City of Poway $367,088 $367,088 $10,745,237 $1,148,674 $11,893,911 $(133) $(133) $(11,123,243) $0 $0 $0 $(11,123,243)

City of San Diego $7,897,776 $7,897,776 $224,394,761 $25,054,949 $249,449,710 $(2,475,410) $(2,475,410) $(206,070,848) $0 $0 $0 $(206,070,848)

City of San Marcos $529,758 $529,758 $14,587,834 $3,002,273 $17,590,107 $(194) $(194) $(22,764,199) $(235,842) $(235,842) $(3,676,095) $(26,440,294)

City of Santee $355,052 $355,052 $10,196,540 $1,081,882 $11,278,422 $(441,129) $(441,129) $(18,214,872) $(241,206) $(241,206) $(8,301,854) $(26,516,726)

City of Solana Beach $106,940 $106,940 $3,156,787 $439,261 $3,596,048 $(36) $(36) $(7,184,380) $(81,094) $(81,094) $(1,357,051) $(8,541,431)

5 07/01/16 - 09/30/16 FISCAL YEAR: FY 2017 QUARTER:1

TransNet Allocations Fund Disbursements

2 Sales Tax Allocations Other Total Program Disbursements Debt Service3 Total Income 1 Allocation Disbursements

PROGRAM & RECIPIENT This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date Program to Date Program to Date This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date Program to Date City of Vista $554,637 $554,637 $15,978,564 $3,574,178 $19,552,742 $(204) $(204) $(16,052,319) $0 $0 $0 $(16,052,319)

San Diego County $3,661,044 $3,661,044 $105,440,764 $13,271,379 $118,712,143 $(904,680) $(904,680) $(108,428,129) $(339,438) $(339,438) $(16,820,748) $(125,248,877)

Total Local Streets and Roads $19,854,136 $19,854,136 $565,856,471 $85,597,826 $651,454,297 $(4,504,494) $(4,504,494) $(544,769,068) $(1,173,419) $(1,173,419) $(40,446,068) $(585,215,136)

Transit Services

MTS $7,750,454 $7,750,454 $220,236,508 $309,501 $220,546,009 $(4,864,369) $(4,864,369) $(217,641,065) $0 $0 $0 $(217,641,065)

NCTD $3,141,177 $3,141,177 $90,182,438 $143,500 $90,325,938 $(3,351,168) $(3,351,168) $(87,919,328) $(33,494) $(33,494) $(1,089,567) $(89,008,895)

Senior Grant Program $365,869 $365,869 $10,427,510 $98,147 $10,525,657 $(136) $(136) $(9,445,978) $0 $0 $0 $(9,445,978)

Total Transit Services $11,257,500 $11,257,500 $320,846,456 $551,148 $321,397,604 $(8,215,673) $(8,215,673) $(315,006,371) $(33,494) $(33,494) $(1,089,567) $(316,095,938)

New Major Corridor Transit Operations $5,526,409 $5,526,409 $157,506,442 $4,054,654 $161,561,096 $261,273 $261,273 $(35,403,888) $0 $0 $0 $(35,403,888)

TOTAL TransNet EXTENSION $70,337,395 $70,337,395 $2,006,448,293 $41,163,806 $2,047,612,099 $(20,478,368) $(20,478,368) $(2,980,637,877) $(70,961,772) $(70,961,772) $(763,452,430) $(3,744,090,307)

Commercial Paper Program Activity

PROGRAM & RECIPIENT Commercial Paper Program Availability 6 PROGRAM & RECIPIENT Commercial Paper Disbursements Prior Years This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date FY to Date Program to Date City of National City $0 $(4,500,000) CP Program $75,000,000 $0 $0 $75,000,000 City of Santee $0 $(3,950,000) NCTD $(28,075,000) $1,325,000 $1,325,000 $(26,750,000) NCTD $0 $(34,000,000) City of La Mesa $(480,000) $0 $0 $(480,000) City of La Mesa $0 $(2,500,000) Major Corridor Capital Projects $(41,096,679) $41,096,679 $41,096,679 $0 City of Del Mar $0 $(704,000) $(5,348,321) $5,348,321 $5,348,321 $0 Major Corridor Capital Projects $0 $(72,413,679) Major Corridor Project EMP Major Corridor Project EMP $0 $(16,052,321) CP AVAILABLE FOR ISSUANCE $0 $47,770,000 $47,770,000 $47,770,000 Total CP Disbursements $0 $(134,120,000)

Other Activity

PROGRAM & RECIPIENT Sales Tax Revenue Transfers for EMP Debt Service Payments

Prior Years This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date Program to Date

Major Corridor Capital Projects $(16,868,725) $5,754,937 $5,754,937 $(11,113,788)

Major Corridor Project EMP $16,868,725 $(5,754,937) $(5,754,937) $11,113,788

Total Other Activity $0 $0 $0 $0

6 07/01/16 - 09/30/16 2008 ABCD Sales Tax Revenue Bond Activity - $600,000,000 2012 A Sales Tax Revenue Bond Activity - $420,585,000

PROGRAM & RECIPIENT Bond Proceeds Disbursements 4 PROGRAM & RECIPIENT Bond Proceeds Disbursements4,5,6

Prior Years This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date Prior Years This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date

San Diego County $6,032,360 $0 $0 $6,032,360 San Diego County $16,893,500 $0 $0 $16,893,500 Major Corridor Capital Projects $428,890,327 $0 $0 $428,890,327 Major Corridor Capital Projects $392,721,119 $0 $0 $392,721,119 Major Corridor Project EMP $42,366,080 $0 $0 $42,366,080 Major Corridor Project EMP $0 $45,517,182 $45,517,182 $0 Total 2012 A Bond $477,288,767 $0 $0 $477,288,767 Disbursement Total 2008 Bond Disbursement $455,131,801 $0 $0 $455,131,801

2010 A Sales Tax Revenue Bond Activity - $338,960,000 2014 A Sales Tax Revenue Bond Activity - $350,000,000 5 PROGRAM & RECIPIENT 6 PROGRAM & RECIPIENT Bond Proceeds Disbursements Bond Proceeds Disbursements

Prior Years This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date Prior Years This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date

City of San Marcos $15,253,815 $0 $0 $15,253,815 City of Del Mar $2,717,864 $0 $0 $2,717,864

City of Solana Beach $5,515,065 $0 $0 $5,515,065 City of San Marcos $1,202,714 $0 $0 $1,202,714 City of Santee $2,972,209 $0 $0 $2,972,209 Major Corridor Capital Projects $276,292,690 $0 $0 $276,292,690 Major Corridor Capital Projects $343,784,800 $0 $0 $343,784,800 Major Corridor Project EMP $43,419,140 $0 $0 $43,419,140 Major Corridor Project EMP $52,233,981 $0 $0 $52,233,981 Total 2010 A Bond Disbursement $340,480,710 $0 $0 $340,480,710 Total 2014 A Bond Disbursement $402,911,568 $0 $0 $402,911,568

2010 B Sales Tax Revenue Bond Activity - $11,040,000 2016 A Sales Tax Revenue Bond Activity - $325,000,000 5 PROGRAM & RECIPIENT Bond Proceeds Disbursements PROGRAM & RECIPIENT Bond Proceeds Disbursements 6

Prior Years This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date Prior Years This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date

City of National City $3,383,956 $0 $0 $3,383,956 Major Corridor Capital Projects $0.00 $60,947,845.00 $60,947,845.00 $60,947,845.00 City of Santee $8,519,844 $0 $0 $8,519,844 Major Corridor Project EMP $0.00 $12,839,395.00 $12,839,395.00 $12,839,395.00 Total 2010 B Bond Disbursement $11,903,800 $0 $0 $11,903,800

Total 2016 A Bond Disbursement $0.00 $73,787,240.00 $73,787,240.00 $73,787,240.00

FOOTNOTES: 1. Other income includes interest revenue, transfers from TransNet I, other non-sales tax revenue, and the one-time swap of Major Corridor Sales Tax Revenue (to LSI Cities and County) for ARRA funds. 2. Program Disbursements include payments to TransNet recipient agencies and program costs, including payments made for Early Action Projects in prior years, and return of funds. 3. Debt Service includes principal and interest payments, including debt payments beginning in March 2008 upon issuance of the 2008 ABCD Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, and other debt service costs net of interest earnings. 4. 2008 Bond Proceeds have been fully disbursed, net of Reserve Requirement of $17.1 million. The Program to Date total includes interest earnings. The 2008 Bonds were partially defeased with the issuance of the 2012 Bonds on June 14, 2012, thereby reducing the 2008 Bond Proceed Disbursement. 5. 2010 and 2012 Bond Proceeds have been fully disbursed and the Program to Date includes interest earnings. 6. The 2012 Bond total includes a premium of $55.8 million, the 2014 Bond total includes a premium of $55.3 million, and the 2016 Bond total includes a premium of $78.8 million.

7 07/01/16 - 09/30/16 Transit Projects Attachment 2

Total Project Project Information Current Status Cost and Budget Schedule Est. Phase Approved Cost at Est. Open to On TransNet Project CIP/ Description/Limits Phase Completion Budget Completion Public Date Schedule? Funded? No. MPO ID Date ($1,000's) ($1,000's)

1 1201507/ SR-15 Rapid Construction Nov-17 $61,349 $61,349 2017 Yes Yes SAN26C Mid-City Centerline Stations

2 1201514/ Downtown BRT Design Jun-17 $45,975 TBD TBD Yes Yes SAN129 Multiuse and Bus Stopover Facility

3 1280504/ South Bay Rapid Construction Sep-18 $112,926 $120,686 2018 Yes Yes SAN47 Otay Mesa to Downtown Bus Rapid Transit Guideway

4 1280513/ I-805/ SR 94 Design Jan-17 $30,900 $30,900 2018 Yes Yes SAN224 Bus on Shoulder Demonstration

5 1049600/ East County Maintenance Facility Construction Apr-17 $44,957 $44,957 2016 Yes No SAN52 Maintenance and Operation Facility

6* 1257001/ Mid-Coast Light Rail Transit (LRT) Construction Sep-21 $2,171,000 $2,171,000 2021 Yes Yes SAN23 Old Town to University Towne Centre

North Coast Corridor 7 1145300/ Rose Canyon Final Sep-17 $1,419 $14,500 TBD Yes No SAN199 3 Bridge Replacements Environmental

North Coast Corridor 8 1145000/ Los Peñasquitos Lagoon Construction May-17 $35,508 $35,508 2017 Yes No SAN163 4 Bridge Replacements

North Coast Corridor 9 1145400/ San Onofre Final Sep-17 $9,938 $13,641 TBD Yes No SAN200 3 Bridge Replacements Environmental

Project changes from previous report are in bold Funding/Budget data as provided in the FY 2017 Program Budget 8 November 2016 Transit Projects

Total Project Project Information Current Status Cost and Budget Schedule Est. Phase Approved Cost at Est. Open to On TransNet Project CIP/ Description/Limits Phase Completion Budget Completion Public Date Schedule? Funded? No. MPO ID Date ($1,000's) ($1,000's)

North Coast Corridor 10 1239803/ Oceanside Station Construction Jul-17 $25,927 $25,980 2017 Yes Yes SAN116 Stub Tracks and Crossover

North Coast Corridor 11 1239805/ Poinsettia Station/Carlsbad Design Jan-17 $21,501 $27,806 2018 Yes Yes SAN117 Run-Through Track

North Coast Corridor 12 1239806/ San Elijo Lagoon Begin Dec-16 $72,849 $74,443 2018 Yes Yes SAN73 Double Tracking Construction

North Coast Corridor 13 1239809/ Eastbrook to Shell Design Jan-18 $6,920 $69,842 TBD TBD Yes SAN64 Double Tracking

North Coast Corridor 14 1239810/ Carlsbad Village Draft Dec-16 $5,680 $59,787 TBD TBD Yes SAN130 Double Tracking Environmental

North Coast Corridor 15 1239811/ Elvira to Morena Construction Sep-19 $108,430 $170,413 2019 Yes Yes SAN132 Double Tracking

North Coast Corridor 16 1239812/ Sorrento-Miramar Curve Final Apr-17 $11,000 $98,071 TBD TBD Yes SAN29 Realignment & 2nd Track - Phase II Environmental

North Coast Corridor 17 1239815/ San Diego River Bridge Construction Mar-19 $82,400 $93,866 2019 Yes Yes SAN182

Project changes from previous report are in bold Funding/Budget data as provided in the FY 2017 Program Budget 9 November 2016 Transit Projects

Total Project Project Information Current Status Cost and Budget Schedule Est. Phase Approved Cost at Est. Open to On TransNet Project CIP/ Description/Limits Phase Completion Budget Completion Public Date Schedule? Funded? No. MPO ID Date ($1,000's) ($1,000's)

North Coast Corridor 18 1239816/ Batiquitos Lagoon Design Apr-17 $52,900 $68,900 2019 Yes Yes SAN183 Double Track

19 1239817/ Chesterfield Drive Begin Dec-16 $4,474 $4,474 2018 Yes Yes SAN73A Crossing Improvements Construction

Approved Cost to Budget Complete

Total for Transit Projects $2,844,704 $3,124,774

*Project funding includes eligible finance costs associated with project

Project changes from previous report are in bold Funding/Budget data as provided in the FY 2017 Program Budget 10 November 2016 Attachment 3

TRANSIT PROJECTS 76 9 1. I-15 BRT Mid-City Centerline Stations 2. Downtown Multiuse and Bus Stopover Facility

Camp Pendleton 3. South Bay BRT

4. I-805/SR 94 Bus on Shoulder Demonstration 15 5. East County Bus Maintenance Facility

6. Mid-Coast LRT Old Town – UTC

7. Rose Canyon Bridge Replacements

8. Los Peñasquitos Lagoon Bridge Replacement 5 76 9. San Onofre Bridge Replacements 10 13 10. Oceanside Station Pass-Through Track Vista Oceanside 11. Poinsettia Station/Carlsbad Run Through Track 78 San 14 Marcos 12. San Elijo Lagoon Double Track 13. Eastbrook to Shell Double Track

14. Carlsbad Village Double Track Carlsbad Escondido 15. Elvira to Morena Double Track 16. Sorrento Miramar – Curve Realignment and 11 Double Track – Phase II 78 17. San Diego River Bridge Rail Improvements 78 18. Batiquitos Lagoon Double Track 18 19. Chesterfield Drive Crossing Improvements 5 Encinitas 12 67 19 Project number refers to Solana Project ID in Attachment 2 Beach Poway

Del Mar 56

8 16 15 County of San Diego

805 Santee 52 67 7 52 5 8 5 15 163 125 San 15 6 Diego La Mesa El Cajon 17 8

805 1

Lemon 94 Grove Major 125 Transit Projects 282 July – September 2016 3 Coronado 2 5 54 Project Under Development National Project Under Construction City 4 125 94

75 805 MILES Chula Map Area Vista San Diego Region

KILOMETERS San Diego 5 Imperial 905 Beach UNITED STATES MEXICO 2-D 2

1-D Tijuana, B.C. 1 3975 11/16 11 Active Transportation Projects Attachment 4

Total Project Project Information Current Status Cost and Budget Schedule Est. Phase Approved Cost at Est. Open to On TransNet Project CIP/ Description/Limits Phase Completion Budget Completion Public Date Schedule? Funded? No. MPO ID Date ($1,000's) ($1,000's)

30 1223016/ Coastal Rail Trail Design Jan-17 $20,636 $20,636 2018 Yes Yes SAN155 Rose Creek South of SR 52 to Mission Bay

31 1223017/ Coastal Rail Trail Draft Jul-17 $6,133 $6,133 2019 TBD Yes SAN156 Encinitas – E St to Chesterfield Dr. Environmental

32 1223018/ Coastal Rail Trail Draft Jul-17 $102 TBD TBD TBD Yes SAN207 Encinitas - Chesterfield Dr. to Solana Beach Environmental

33* 1223023/ Inland Rail Trail - Phase 1 Construction Nov-16 $48,775 $48,775 2016 Yes Yes SAN153 County Line to N. Pacific Street San Marcos Segment

34* 1223023/ Inland Rail Trail - Phases 2 - 4 Design Dec-16 – – 2018 Yes Yes SAN153 Melrose Drive to County Line

35** 1143700/ Bayshore Bikeway - Segment 5 Begin Dec-16 $7,985 $7,985 2017 Yes Yes SAN144 32nd Street to National City Marina Construction

36 1129900/ Bayshore Bikeway - Segment 8B Final Nov-16 $3,023 $3,023 2018 Yes Yes SAN154 Main St. to Palomar Environmental

37 1223055/ Bayshore Bikeway Draft Feb-17 $13,571 $13,571 2019 Yes Yes SAN195 Barrio Logan Environmental

38 1223020/ North Park/Mid-City Bikeways: Design Jul-17 $5,946 $5,946 2018 Yes Yes SAN158 Robinson Bikeway

39 1223022/ Uptown Bikeways: Design Jun-17 $20,910 $20,910 2018 Yes Yes SAN160 Fourth and Fifth Avenue Bikeways

40 1223014/ SR 15 Commuter Bike Facility Construction May-17 $14,465 $14,465 2017 Yes Yes CAL330 Camino del Rio South to Adams Ave

41 1223054/ Central Avenue Bikeway Draft Mar-17 $904 $1,400 TBD Yes Yes SAN204 Adams Ave to Landis Street Environmental

Project changes from previous report are in bold Funding/Budget data as provided in the FY 17 Program Budget 12 November 2016 Active Transportation Projects

Total Project Project Information Current Status Cost and Budget Schedule Est. Phase Approved Cost at Est. Open to On TransNet Project CIP/ Description/Limits Phase Completion Budget Completion Public Date Schedule? Funded? No. MPO ID Date ($1,000's) ($1,000's)

42 1223052/ San Diego River Trail Design Jan-17 $2,286 $2,286 2017 Yes Yes SAN197 Qualcomm Stadium

43 1223053/ San Diego River Trail Draft May-17 $1,582 $10,228 TBD TBD Yes SAN198 Carlton Oaks Segment Environmental

44 1223056/ Border to Bayshore Bikeway Draft Apr-17 $12,216 $12,216 TBD Yes Yes SAN203 Along Palm Ave Environmental

45 1223057/ Pershing Bikeway Draft Mar-17 $1,730 TBD TBD TBD Yes SAN205 Landis Street to C Street Environmental

46 1223058/ Downtown Bikeway Final Sep-17 $4,510 TBD TBD TBD Yes SAN206 Imperial Ave from 47th St to Park Blvd Environmental

47 1223078/ North Park/Mid-City Bikeways: Design May-17 $4,471 $4,471 2018 Yes Yes SAN229 Landis Bikeway

48 1223079/ North Park/Mid-City Bikeways: Final Feb-17 $359 TBD TBD TBD Yes SAN230 Howard-Orange Bikeway Environmental

49 1223080/ North Park/Mid-City Bikeways: Final Feb-17 $333 TBD TBD TBD Yes SAN238 Monroe Bikeway Environmental

50 1223081/ North Park/Mid-City Bikeways: Final Feb-17 $426 TBD TBD TBD Yes SAN232 University Bikeway Environmental

51 1223082/ North Park/Mid-City Bikeways: Design Jul-17 $8,394 $8,394 2018 Yes Yes SAN233 Georgia-Meade Bikeway

52 1223083/ Uptown Bikeways: Design Dec-17 $5,379 $5,379 2019 Yes Yes SAN234 Eastern Hillcrest Bikeways

53 1223084/ Uptown Bikeways: Design Mar-18 $1,220 TBD TBD TBD Yes SAN235 Washington Street and Mission Valley Bikeways

Project changes from previous report are in bold Funding/Budget data as provided in the FY 17 Program Budget 13 November 2016 Active Transportation Projects

Total Project Project Information Current Status Cost and Budget Schedule Est. Phase Approved Cost at Est. Open to On TransNet Project CIP/ Description/Limits Phase Completion Budget Completion Public Date Schedule? Funded? No. MPO ID Date ($1,000's) ($1,000's)

54 1223085/ Uptown Bikeways: Design Jun-18 $358 TBD TBD TBD Yes SAN236 Mission Hills and Old Town Bikeways

55 1223086/ Uptown Bikeways: Final TBD $568 TBD TBD TBD Yes SAN237 Park Boulevard Bikeway Environmental

Approved Cost to Budget Complete

Total for Active Transportation Projects $186,282 $185,818

*Project funding shown in Segment 1 is a combination of Segments 1-4 as shown in CIP 1223023 **Project funding shown in Segment 4 is combination of both Segments 4 and 5 as shown in CIP 1143700

Project changes from previous report are in bold Funding/Budget data as provided in the FY 17 Program Budget 14 November 2016 Attachment 5

76

Camp Pendleton

15

Inland Rail Trail - Melrose Dr. to County Line (Phases 2-4)

5 Inland Rail Trail - 76 County Line to N. Pacific St. (Phase 1)

Vista Oceanside 78 San Marcos

Carlsbad Escondido

78

5 78 Encinitas

Coastal 67 Rail Trail Encinitas Solana Beach Poway County of San Diego Del Mar 56

15

Santee San Diego River Trail - Carlton Oaks 5 San Diego River Trail - 805 Qualcomm Stadium 52 67 Coastal Rail Trail 52 Along Rose Creek 8 163 125 San 15 Diego La SR 15 Commuter Bike Facility Mesa El Cajon 8

Uptown Bikeways North Park/Mid-City Bikeways 5 Lemon 94 Grove Major Active 125 Transportation Projects 282 Bayshore Bikeway - July – September 2016 National Barrio Logan City Coronado 54 Project Under Development Project Under Construction Bayshore 125 94 Bikeway - 75 805 MILES Segment 5 Chula Map Area Vista Bayshore Bikeway - San Diego Region KILOMETERS Segment 8B San Diego Imperial 5 Beach 905 UNITED STATES Border to Bayshore MEXICO 2-D Bikeway 2

1-D Tijuana, B.C. 1 3975 11/16 15 Express/HOV Lanes and Direct Access Ramp (DAR) Projects Attachment 6

Total Project Project Information Current Status Cost and Budget Schedule

Est. Phase Approved Cost at Est. Open to On TransNet Description/Limits Phase Completion Budget Completion Project CIP/ Public Date Schedule? Funded? Date ($1,000's) ($1,000's) No. MPO ID

60 1200504/ I-5 North Coast Corridor CAL09 Manchester Avenue to SR 78 Begin Dec-16 $471,800 $746,800 2021 Yes Yes 2 HOV Lanes/Noise Barriers Construction

61 1200507/ I-5/Voigt Design Oct-17 $6,000 TBD TBD TBD Yes CAL369 La Jolla Village Drive and Genessee Avenue

62 1200508/ I-5/Gilman Drive Bridge Construction Oct-18 $15,000 $15,000 2017 Yes Yes CAL399 Gilman Drive to Medical Center Drive

63 1207801/ SR 78 HOV/Managed Lanes Project Dec-16 $1,683 TBD TBD TBD Yes CAL278 SR 78 from I-5 to I-15 Study

64 1280508/ SR 94 Express Lanes Draft Dec-19 $22,600 TBD TBD TBD Yes CAL67 I-5 to I-805 Environmental 2 HOV Lanes & Connectors at SR 94/I-805

65 1280510/ I-805 Managed Lanes - South Construction Dec-16 $179,611 $179,611 2016 Yes Yes CAL78C Palomar Street to SR 94 Direct Access Ramps

Approved Cost to Budget Complete

Total for HOV/DAR Projects $714,620 $959,337

Project changes from previous report are in bold Funding/Budget data as provided in the FY 17 Program Budget 16 November 2016 Attachment 7

76

Camp Pendleton

15

5 76

Vista Oceanside 78 San Marcos

I-5 HOV Lanes Escondido and Noise Barriers Carlsbad

78 I-5 HOV/General Purpose Lanes 78

Encinitas 5

67 Solana Beach Poway

Del Mar 56

15 I-5/Voigt DAR

County of San Diego I-5/Gilman Drive Bridge

805 Santee 52 67 52 8 5 163 125 San 15 Diego La Mesa El Cajon 8

Major Express/ 805 HOV Lanes and Lemon 94 Grove Direct Access Ramp 125 (DAR) Projects 282 July – September 2016

Coronado 5 54 Project Under Development National Project Under Construction SR 94 City Express Lanes 125 94 805 75 Chula MILES Vista Map Area San Diego Region E. Palomar Street DAR KILOMETERS San Diego 5 Imperial 905 Beach UNITED STATES MEXICO 2-D 2

1-D Tijuana, B.C. 1 3975 11/16 17 Highway Projects Attachment 8

Total Project Project Information Current Status Cost and Budget Schedule Est. Phase Approved Cost at Est. Open to On TransNet Project CIP/ Description/Limits Phase Completion Budget Completion Public Date Schedule? Funded? No. MPO ID Date ($1,000's) ($1,000's)

North Coast Corridor 70 1200506/ I-5/Genesee Avenue Interchange Construction Nov-17 $116,400 $116,400 2017 Yes Yes CAL75 Interchange and South Bound Aux Lane

71 1200503/ I-5/ SR 56 Interchange Final Jan-17 $18,963 $18,963 TBD TBD Yes CAL114 West-North and South-East Interchanges Environmental

72 CAL71 I-5/ SR 78 Connectors Draft Dec-20 $5,000 $250,000 TBD Yes No South to East Connector and West to South Environmental

73 1201101/ SR 11 4-Lane Freeway and East Design Mar-18 $596,000 $596,000 TBD TBD Yes Otay Mesa Border Crossing (Phase II) V11 Enrico Fermi to Port of Entry Freeway Access to New Border Crossing

74* 1207606/ SR 76 East Widening (Phase 2)* Construction Oct-17 $201,664 $201,664 2017 Yes Yes CAL29B South Mission Road to Old Highway 395

75 1390504/ SR 905/125/11 Connectors (Northbound) Construction Nov-16 $21,506 $21,506 2016 Yes Yes CAL325 Westbound SR 905-Northbound SR 125 Eastbound SR 905-Northbound SR 125 Westbound SR 11-Northbound SR 125

76 1390505/ SR 905/125/11 Connectors (Southbound) Design Sep-17 $68,947 $68,947 2020 Yes No CAL325A Westbound SR 905-Southbound 125 Eastbound SR 11-Southbound 125 Southbound 905-Southbound 125 Approved Cost to Budget Complete Total for Highway Projects $1,028,480 $1,273,480

*Budget/Funding amount inclusive of Phases 1 and 2 as shown in CIP 1207606

Project changes from previous report are in bold Funding/Budget data as provided in the FY 17 Program Budget 18 November 2016 Attachment 9

76

Camp Pendleton

15

SR 76 Highway Widening East

5 76

Vista Oceanside 78 San Marcos I-5 / SR 78 Connectors

Escondido Carlsbad

78

78

Encinitas 5

67 Solana Beach Poway

Del Mar 56

I-5/SR 56 New Connectors 15

I-5/Genesee Avenue Interchange County of San Diego Widening/Improvements

805 Santee 52 67 52 8 5 163 125 San 15 Diego La Mesa El Cajon 8 SR 94 / SR 125 805 Interchange Connectors

Lemon 94 Grove 125 Major Highway Projects July – September 2016 282 SR 905/SR125/SR11 Coronado 5 54 New Connectors Project Under Development (Southbound) National Project Under Construction City SR 905/SR125/SR11 125 94 805 New Connectors (Northbound) 75 MILES Chula Vista

KILOMETERS San Diego SR 11 (Phase II) 5 Imperial 905 New Freeway Beach UNITED STATES 2-D MEXICO 2

1-D Tijuana, B.C. 1 3975 11/16 19 Attachment 10

Assists by Patrol Beat 76 1 2,613

Camp Pendleton 2 2,272

15 3 1,987

4 2,133

5 1,969 5 76 6 2,064

Vista 7 2,209 Oceanside 78 San 1,766 Marcos 8

13 9 1,806

1,693 Escondido 11 Carlsbad 12 1,922 11 78 13 895 78 15 690 Encinitas 5

12 67 Solana Beach Poway

Del Mar 9 56

15

County of San Diego

805 Santee 52 67 8 52 6 8 5 163 5 125 San 15 Diego La Mesa El Cajon 7 8

® 805 4 Lemon 94 Grove 125

282 3

Freeway Service Coronado 5 1 54 National Patrol Assists City July – September 2016 125 94 805 75 2 MILES Chula Vista Map Area San Diego Region

KILOMETERS San Diego 5 Imperial 905 15 Beach UNITED STATES MEXICO 2-D 2

1-D Tijuana, B.C. 1 3975 11/16 20 AGENDA ITEM NO. 16-11-8 BOARD OF DIRECTORS NOVEMBER 18, 2016 ACTION REQUESTED – INFORMATION

REPORT ON MEETINGS AND EVENTS ATTENDED File Number 8000100 ON BEHALF OF SANDAG

Since the last Board of Directors meeting, Board members participated in the following meetings and events on behalf of SANDAG. Key topics of discussion also are summarized.

October 20-21, 2016: Mobility 21 Annual Summit Anaheim, CA

SANDAG Immediate Past Chair Jack Dale, and Lemon Grove Mayor Mary Sessom attended the Mobility 21 Annual Summit “Empowering California” as the SANDAG representatives. They participated in various sessions on transportation issues impacting the San Diego region and southern California. The sessions covered various topics such as connected vehicles, transit ridership, freight and goods movement, economics, and legislative issues.

October 27, 2016: Facilitating Access to Coordinated Transportation Board of Directors Meeting Encinitas, CA

As the SANDAG representative and 2016 Chair of the Facilitating Access to Coordinated Transportation (FACT) Board of Directors, County Supervisor Dave Roberts attended the FACT Board of Directors meeting. The Board approved the addition of Stephen Chavez-Matzel, Interim Director of Case Management, Tri-City Medical Center, to an open position on the Council on Access and Mobility. The Board accepted recommendations from the Nominating Committee to recommend the following slate of 2017 officers: Chair: Bob Campbell; Vice Chair: LaVonna Connelly; Secretary: Lemon Grove Mayor Pro Tem George Gastil; Treasurer: Susan Hafner. FACT Chair Roberts also provided a report from the Annual Meeting Planning Committee for the January 26, 2017, Annual Meeting. Staff updated the Board on vehicle sharing and FACT services.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Key Staff Contact: Victoria Stackwick, (619) 699-6926, [email protected]

AGENDA ITEM NO. 16-11-9 BOARD OF DIRECTORS NOVEMBER 18, 2016 ACTION REQUESTED – INFORMATION

REPORT SUMMARIZING DELEGATED ACTIONS File Number 8000100 TAKEN BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

Introduction

Various Board Policies require the Executive Director to report certain actions to the Board of Directors on a monthly basis or upon taking specified actions.

Discussion

Board Policy No. 003

Board Policy No. 003: Investment Policy, states that a monthly report of all investment transactions shall be submitted to the Board of Directors. Attachment 1 contains the reportable investment transactions for September 2016.

Board Policy No. 008

Section 6 of Board Policy No. 008: Legal Matters, authorizes the Office of General Counsel or outside counsel to file documents and make appearances on behalf of SANDAG in court proceedings:

Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project

• On October 28, 2016, Nossaman LLP filed, on behalf of SANDAG, a Request for Dismissal (San Diego Gas & Electric Company), in the matter SANDAG v. La Jolla Eastgate Building LP, (San Diego Superior Court Case No. 2016-00025271)

• On November 3, 2016, Nossaman LLP filed, on behalf of SANDAG, a Request for Dismissal, in the matter SANDAG v. Temple Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (San Diego Superior Court Case No. 2016-00034220)

• On November 4, 2016, Nossaman LLP filed, on behalf of SANDAG, Notice of Entry of Order for Prejudgment Possession, in the matter SANDAG v. Edward C. Malone, Co-Trustee (San Diego Superior Court Case No. 2016-00025263)

• On November 4, 2016, Nossaman LLP filed, on behalf of SANDAG, Notice of Entry of Order for Prejudgment Possession, in the matter SANDAG v. La Jolla Canyon Gardens LLC (San Diego Superior Court Case No. 2016-00025276)

• On November 4, 2016, Nossaman LLP filed, on behalf of SANDAG, Notice of Entry of Order for Prejudgment Possession, in the matter of SANDAG v. La Jolla Eastgate Building LP, (San Diego Superior Court Case No. 2016-00025271)

• On November 4, 2016, Best, Best & Krieger filed a Petition for Writ of Mandate in the matter SANDAG v. Navarra Morena Properties (San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2016-00018198)

• On November 4, 2016, Rick Rayl of Nossaman appeared at the Motion for Prejudgment Possession on behalf of SANDAG in the matter SANDAG v. La Jolla Canyon Gardens, (San Diego Superior Court Case No. 2016-00025276)

• On November 4, 2016, Rick Rayl of Nossaman LLP appeared at the Motion for Prejudgment Possession on behalf of SANDAG in the matter SANDAG v. La Jolla Eastgate, (San Diego Superior Court Case No. 2016-00025271)

• On November 4, 2016, Rick Rayl of Nossaman LLP appeared at the Motion for Prejudgment Possession on behalf of SANDAG in the matter SANDAG v. Edward C. Malone, (San Diego Superior Court Case No. 2016-00025263)

• On November 7, 2016, Nossaman LLP filed, on behalf of SANDAG, a Disclaimer of Interest Re La Jolla 2 Hotel Operator, LLC, in the matter SANDAG v. CWI 2 La Jolla Hotel, LP (San Diego Superior Court Case No. 2016-00034231)

• On November 7, 2016, Nossaman LLP filed, on behalf of SANDAG, (1) Disclaimer of Interest (Ethos Lending, LLC), (2) Disclaimer of Interest (Housing and Urban Development), (3) Disclaimer of Interest (Investors Heritage Life Insurance Company), (4) Disclaimer of Interest (Mega Capital), (5) Disclaimer of Interest (Residential Wholesale Mortgage), and (6) Disclaimer of Interest (Silvergate Bank), in the matter SANDAG v. Colony La Paz Condominium Association (San Diego Superior Court Case No. 2016-00030407).

Board Policy No. 017

Board Policy No. 017: Delegation of Authority, authorizes the Executive Director to take specified actions and requires those actions to be reported to the Board of Directors at the next regular meeting.

Section 4.2 of the Policy states a monthly report of all approvals of design plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) for Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) shall be submitted to the Board of Directors. The PS&E for the following CIP were approved.

• Inland Rail Trail Rebid, San Marcos to Vista, Segments 2A, 2B, 3A, 3D, and 4 Project, CIP 1223023

• Airport Connection Pedestrian Walkway Project, CIP 1145500

Section 4.3 authorizes the Executive Director to execute all right-of-way property transfer documents, including rights of entry, licenses, leases, deeds, easements, escrow instructions, and certificates of acceptance. The list below reflects the approved documents for this reporting period.

2 • Inland Rail Trail Project, CIP 1223023

No. Address Nature of Activity (4.3) Date

Summary of Recommended 180-141-50-00; Phillips Street, Vista, CA 1. Settlement; Temporary 10/12/16 92083; Contract No. 5003225 Construction Easement Summary of Recommended Settlement; Agreement of 161-030-23; Wal-Mart, southeast corner of Purchase; Joint Escrow 2. Oceanside Boulevard and Melrose Drive, 10/12/16 Instructions; Grant Deed; Oceanside, CA 92049; Contract No. 5003242 Temporary Construction Easement

• Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project, CIP 1257001

No. Address Nature of Activity (4.3) Date

344-240-06-00; Bartell Hotels, 3299 Holiday Temporary Construction 1. Court, La Jolla, CA 92037; Contract No. 10/3/16 Easement 5008275 Summary of Recommended 436-660-47-00; San Diego Humane Society, Settlement; Temporary 2. 887 Sherman Street, San Diego, CA 92110; 10/12/16 Construction Easement; Contract No. 5008255 Grant Deed

Section 4.4 authorizes the Executive Director to establish an offer of just compensation for the purchase of real property based upon specified conditions. Consistent with Board Policy, the following offers were made.

• Elvira to Morena Double Track Project, CIP 1239811

Appraisal Offer Date & No. Address Nature of Activity (4.4) Amount Amount 359-010-33, 359-010-34, 676-010-01; Offer to Purchase Real 10/3/16, 1. 5111 Santa Fe Street, San Diego, CA $503,000 Property $503,000 92109; Contract No. 5008234

3 • Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project, CIP 1257001

Appraisal Offer Date & No. Address Nature of Activity (4.4) Amount Amount 436-180-17-00; Floit Properties, Inc. (ToysRUs), 1280 W. Morena Revised Offer to 10/7/16, 1. $850,000 Boulevard, San Diego CA 92110; Purchase $850,000 Contract No. 5008281

Board Policy No. 024

Board Policy No. 024: Procurement and Contracting – Construction Policy, Section 5.1, states that the Executive Director is delegated the authority to grant relief from maintenance and responsibility on major elements of each major construction project and shall report to the Board all such relief granted on contracts over $25,000. The following construction project was approved.

• East County Bus Maintenance Facility Project, CIP 1049600, Contract No. 5004134 (Limited Relief from Maintenance)

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachments: 1. Monthly Activity for Investment Securities Transactions for September 1 through September 30, 2016

Key Staff Contact: André Douzdjian, (619) 699-6931, [email protected]

4 Attachment 1

MONTHLY ACTIVITY FOR INVESTMENT SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS FOR SEPTEMBER 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2016

Yield to Transaction Maturity Par Original Maturity Date Date Security Value Cost at Cost BOUGHT 09/13/2016 02/18/2020 CNH ABS $ 1,285,000.00 $ 1,284, 883.07 1.27% 09/14/2016 04/15/2021 HYUNDAI AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 1,100,000.00 1, 099,851.94 1.30% 09/15/2016 10/12/2018 FHLMC REFERENCE NOTE 5,095,000.00 5, 092,809.15 0.90%

TOTAL BOUGHT: $ 7,480,000.00 $ 7,477,544.16 1.02% MATURED 09/01/2016 09/01/2016 FHLMC $ 19,774.56 $ 19,972. 15 0.99% 09/01/2016 09/01/2016 FNMA 15,575.50 15, 731.14 1.26% 09/01/2016 09/01/2016 THE COCA-COLA COMPANY 2,450,000.00 2, 519,947.50 0.64% 09/15/2016 09/15/2016 TOYOTA ABS 113,503.90 113, 502.82 0.71% 09/28/2016 09/28/2016 FNMA NOTES 2,370,000.00 2, 392,443.90 0.50% 09/30/2016 09/30/2016 BANK OF TOKYO MITS UFJ LTD COMM PAPER 850,000.00 849, 233.11 0.58%

TOTAL MATURED: $ 5,818,853.96 $ 5,910,830.62 0.58%

SOLD 09/01/2016 12/15/2017 USAA AUTO OWNER TRUST $ 167,880.45 $ 167,919. 79 0.55% 1 09/07/2016 03/31/2017 US TREASURY NOTES 9,755,000.00 9,795, 391.80 0.70% 3 09/13/2016 12/31/2017 US TREASURY NOTES 1,285,000.00 1,281, 285.55 0.86% 2 09/14/2016 04/30/2019 US TREASURY NOTES 1,100,000.00 1,128, 488.28 0.70% 2 09/15/2016 10/31/2018 US TREASURY NOTES 5,095,000.00 5,110, 125.78 1.15% 3

TOTAL SOLD: $ 17,402,880.45 $ 17,483,211.20 0.84%

1 This was a paydown on an amortizing bond at the discretion of the issuer. 2 Proceeds from this sale were used to purchase new securities that would provide higher returns over a longer holding period. 3 Proceeds from this sale were used to purchase a new security that would provide higher returns with a comparable maturity.

5 AGENDA ITEM NO. 16-11-10 BOARD OF DIRECTORS NOVEMBER 18, 2016 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

ELECTION OF 2017 SANDAG BOARD OFFICERS File Number 8000100

Introduction Recommendation

Consistent with SANDAG Bylaws, in September 2016 The Nominating Committee recommends Chair Ron Roberts appointed the following that the Board of Directors approve the Nominating Committee for SANDAG Board Officers: following slate for 2017 SANDAG Board San Diego Councilmember Todd Gloria (City of Officers: San Diego), Nominating Committee Chair; Carlsbad • Chair – San Diego County Supervisor Mayor Matt Hall (North County Coastal); Vista Mayor Ron Roberts Judy Ritter (North County Inland); Santee Vice Mayor Jack Dale (East County); and Coronado • First Vice Chair – Del Mar Deputy Councilmember Carrie Downey (South County). Mayor Terry Sinnott • Second Vice Chair – Imperial Beach In early November, the Nominating Committee Mayor Serge Dedina recommended a slate of Board Officers for 2017 for approval by the Board of Directors. In accordance The Board of Directors is asked to elect with SANDAG Bylaws, Board members may make SANDAG Board Officers for the upcoming additional nominations for any officer position during year. the November Board meeting.

Discussion

Annual Nomination and Election Process

The SANDAG Bylaws set forth the annual nomination and election process for SANDAG Board Officers. The process calls for an application form for the Chair, First Vice Chair, and Second Vice Chair positions to be made available on the SANDAG website in or around July. To be considered for one of the officer positions, prospective applicants must provide information about their current status and term of office, SANDAG experience, and other public agency experience; describe their reasons for seeking a Board Officer position; and describe their vision and leadership qualities.

Nominating Committee Recommendations

The applications received included San Diego County Supervisor Ron Roberts for Chair, Del Mar Deputy Mayor Terry Sinnott for First Vice Chair, and Imperial Beach Mayor Serge Dedina for Second Vice Chair (Attachment 1). In late October, the Nominating Committee reviewed the candidate

applications and unanimously recommended approval of Supervisor Roberts, Deputy Mayor Sinnott, and Mayor Dedina for the 2017 Board Officer positions.

Nominating Committee members recognized that the candidates are individuals with strong leadership experience and who are dedicated to the agency and the San Diego region. Committee members also recognized that the candidates have the ability to provide the extra time commitment involved as a SANDAG Board Officer. The overall slate of candidates also provides regional diversity and representation across the subregions.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachment: 1. Applications for 2017 SANDAG Chair, First Vice Chair, and Second Vice Chair positions

Key Staff Contact: Kim Kawada, (619) 699-6994, [email protected]

2 Attachment 1

3 4 5

SANDAG BOARD OFFICER APPLICATION FORM FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2017

Position Applying For (more than one box can be marked):

Chair √ First Vice Chair Second Vice Chair

Application Name Terry Sinnott

Local Jurisdiction City of Del Mar

Elected Official Title Member City Council No. Years in Position 6

Date Current Term of Office Expires (month/date/year) December, 2018

Are you eligible to Run in the Next Election? Yes

Next Election Date (month/date/year) November, 2018

SANDAG EXPERIENCE Please list current and prior involvement in SANDAG activities, including membership on Board, Policy Advisory Committees, and working groups.

Group or Activity Time Period

Alternate SANDAG Board Member, City of Del Mar 2010-2012

SANDAG Board Member, City of Del Mar 2012 - Present

Executive Committee, Alternate, North County Coastal 2013-2015

Chair, Environmental Mitigation Working Group Feb 2014- Present

Chair, Public Safety Committee April2015-March 2016

Executive Committee, North County Coastal Jan 2016 - Present

First Vice President Jan 2016 - Present

6 INTEREST IN SERVING ON SANDAG] SINNOTT 1. Why do you want to serve as a SANDAG Board Officer?

I respect the SANDAG organization and the unique value it plays in making the San Diego Region a better place. It is critical that SANDAG fulfill its commitments to voters by planning and building effective transportation infrastructure for the future. To do this the Board must provide leadership and work as a group to meet these high expectations. I have the leadership skills which I think can contribute to that effort ….. and continue our record of success.

2. What is your vision for SANDAG next year and in five years?

Next year I would like to see three issues resolved: That the RTP is successfully completed. a) That if successful, the TransNet sales tax increase is implemented in a comprehensive and transparent process. b) That if not successful, the Board create a new vision and strategic plan for the implementing the RTP. c) That SANDAG audits its data-collection efforts throughout the organization and ensures that we are complying with all best management practices.

In the next five years I would like to see: a) The mid-coast trolley extension is well-underway ….. on schedule, on budget. b) Projects like Otay Mesa East, I5 Improvements, I5 & 78 Interchange, Genessee Ave, … are progressing successfully. c) That SANDAG’s toll road operations are well managed and meet transportation goals. d) That a succession plan for SANDAG is fully developed and on track. e) Our bond rating continues strong.

3. Describe how you believe you are in touch with you constituents and give examples of why you have represented them well in the past. a) I am in my second term in a small city where everyone knows everyone. b) The City of Del Mar is very liberal, very conservative and very “no-preference”. c) I revitalized our Finance Committee and tackled the pension liability issue. d) I drafted a new public art policy for the City. e) Established a Business Support Advisory Committee for Del Mar businesses to voice their recommendations. f) Sponsored a fresh look at building restrictions in Del Mar to satisfy opposing factions. g) We a progressing on building a new City Hall h) We have identified a need for stronger law enforcement in Del Mar. i) Created high-involvement public outreach to master plan our one remaining open-space park. j) Provided a “calming” strategy to improve relations between the Del Mar community and the Del Mar Fairgrounds board. k) Initiated the first City customer service survey of residents. l) Originated pay-for-performance compensation for City Manager. m) There’s more.

8/20/2016 2 7 INTEREST IN SERVING ON SANDAG] SINNOTT 4. Is your interest in serving only as Vice Chair, or do you see yourself wanting to serve as Chair in the future?

I believe that the key to good leadership is to have people in the organization want you to serve in a leadership position. I cannot visualize myself as SANDAG Chair until I am seen as successful in the Vice Chair position. There are many good, qualified people on the Board who can qualify for the Board Chair.

OTHER PUBLIC AGENCY EXPERIENCE Please list current and prior involvement in other public agency activities, including membership of boards, councils, or committees.

Group or Activity Time Period

Treasurer, Regional Solid Waste Association 2012 to Present President, Del Mar Village Association Retired Board member, Del Mar Community Connections Retired City of Del Mar Legislative Advocacy 2012 to Present Coastal City Fire Cooperative (Del Mar, Encinitas, Solana Beach) Quarterly A Number of Del Mar Community Committees Ongoing

Do you anticipate service to these agencies to be in conflict with a leadership position at SANDAG?

Yes No

Signature (signed) T L Sinnott

Date (dated) 8/20/2016

Please return completed application form by 5 p.m. on Wednesday, August 31, 2016, to:

SANDAG Attn: Tessa Lero, Executive Assistant/Clerk of the Board 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101-4231 E-mail: [email protected] Tel: (619) 699-1991 Fax: (619) 699-1995

8/20/2016 3 8

SANDAG BOARD OFFICER APPLICATION FORM FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2017

Position Applying For (more than one box can be marked):

Chair First Vice Chair Second Vice Chair

Application Name Serge Dedina

Local Jurisdiction Imperial Beach

Elected Official Title Mayor No. Years in Position 2

Date Current Term of Office Expires (month/date/year) 12/10/2018

Are you eligible to Run in the Next Election? Yes

Next Election Date (month/date/year) November 2018

SANDAG EXPERIENCE Please list current and prior involvement in SANDAG activities, including membership on Board, Policy Advisory Committees, and working groups.

Group or Activity Time Period

Board of Directors Primary Member 2016

Board of Directors Second Alternate 2015

Borders Committee Member 2015-Present

Shoreline Preservation Committee-Chair 2016

9 INTEREST IN SERVING ON SANDAG Attach separate pages as needed. Do not exceed three (3) pages in addition to this application form.

1. Why do you want to serve as a SANDAG Board Officer?

As a SANDAG Board Officer I will be committed to building consensus among fellow Board members to carry out the SANDAG mission and improve the quality of life of our region. My pragmatic, non- partisan, consensus driven approach to public policy and public service has served me well as Mayor of Imperial Beach and during my tenure as a SANDAG Board member, especially on the Borders Committee. My extensive experience in the public sector gives me additional insight into how to more effectively reach out to the public and build greater support for SANDAG infrastructure initiatives. My ability to speak fluent Spanish combined with my professional experience working on the U.S.-Mexico border provides me with additional capacity to reach out to our partners in Mexico. This is a role I have enjoyed playing as a member of the Borders Committee during San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce trips to Mexico City. Finally, my extensive work carrying out large-scale ecosystem conservation and restoration programs in the U.S., along the U.S.-Mexico border and in Mexico and working on climate change adaptation and mitigation programs, gives me a unique perspective on how to more effectively frame our work to preserve and protect our regional environment and build resident and stakeholder support for our efforts.

2. What is your vision for SANDAG next year and in five years?

More than ever, it is critical that we move the Regional Transportation Plan forward in a timely and cost-effective manner and build greater public support and recognition for the outstanding and impactful investments that SANDAG has made and will make in our region. We must broaden our capacity to communicate in more effective and innovative ways with the rapidly growing and changing population of San Diego County so that SANDAG is perceived to have more credibility and more relevance in the everyday lives of our residents. We must make SANDAG more relevant and a cutting edge communicator of its impact in San Diego, so that we are viewed as indispensable to the future of San Diego by residents. In terms of SANDAG projects, we must invest in public transit, active transportation, climate and fire resiliency programs, smart highway and roadway improvements, and improving water quality and storage. However, if we are not on the cutting edge and ahead of the public in how we communicate the importance of these investments, we will not be able to carry them out.

3. Describe how you believe you are in touch with your constituents and give examples of why you have represented them well in the past.

In Imperial Beach I have worked extensively and successfully with our city staff, local community organizations, the business community and our military to improve the way in which our city government does business and proactively works with our community to get things done. We have moved to a consensus, team-driven and business and community friendly culture that has had a significant impact in attracting public and private sector investment in Imperial Beach as well as philanthropic investment. We have vastly changed the culture at City Hall so that our city staff work with and for the community and respond to concerns in a friendly, proactive and positive way. This approach significantly reduced community conflict and increased project approvals and implementation. As someone who grew up in Imperial Beach, I am continually out on the street walking or riding my bike and meeting with and talking to constituents.

2 10

Some examples of how we have significantly improved trust in City Hall include the following: 1) We changed our code enforcement strategy from a punitive focus on individual and mostly low-income single family home owners, to one that is focused on working with organizations like Habitat for Humanity San Diego to invest in improving neighborhoods and assisting low-income residents and seniors fix up their homes. We now focus our code enforcement efforts on identifying dilapidated and run-down properties owned by absentee landlords and eliminating blight, especially related to cleaning up garbage-filled empty lots. We are tearing down old and rusty chain link fences around empty lots and working with community organizations to transform those lots into community pocket parks (in partnership with property owners); 2) To build community support for our budgeting and financial management process, we simplified our city budget, making it much more user and reader friendly. We also held our first ever open-air budget feedback workshop in a local park. We are holding the second open-air community feedback workshop in September; and 3) We have made significant investments in improving neighborhood infrastructure through the construction of crosswalks, sidewalks, and paving alleys. The completion of these projects is then celebrated with the residents who benefit from them.

On the SANDAG board, especially as a member of the Borders Committee, I have focused on supporting improvements in border crossings, especially as they are related to improving air quality and reducing pedestrian wait times. This has a direct impact on my constituents who cross the border frequently and are impacted by the air emissions from border vehicle wait times. As the new Chair of the Shoreline Preservation Committee, I have worked to build support to continue a regional approach to preserving our coastline and having a clear understanding of the science and policy process behind climate resiliency efforts and funding.

Finally, I communicate frequently on my mayoral work via the television and print media in English and Spanish and through social media and a bi-weekly column I write for our local newspaper.

4. For Vice Chair positions. Is your interest in serving only as a Vice Chair, or do you see yourself wanting to serve as Chair in the future?

I would be interested in serving as SANDAG chair in the future.

OTHER PUBLIC AGENCY EXPERIENCE Please list current and prior involvement in other public agency activities, including membership of boards, councils, or committees.

Group or Activity Time Period

Sheriff’s Community Advisory Board 2012-2014

City of Chula Vista Climate Change Committee 2010-2011

San Diego County Marine Protected Area Collaborative 2012-present

Mar Vista High School Poseidon Academy Advisory Board 2000-2012

3 11

Imperial Beach Collaborative (co-founder) 2014-present San Diego Gas & Electric Community Advisory Board 2013-present

Please note that over the past 20 years I have collaborated professionally with with the following agencies: International Boundary and Water Commission, U.S. EPA, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, NOAA, U.S. Navy, U.S. State Department California Coastal Commission, California Coastal Conservancy, California Natural Resources Agency, California State Parks, California Fish and Wildlife, Cal Recycle, California EPA, County of San Diego, City of San Diego, City of Encinitas, City of Chula Vista, Port of San Diego, San Diego Airport Authority, State of Baja California, Mexico Ministry of Environment (SEMARNAT), Mexico Protected Areas Commission (CONANP), and Mexico Water Agency (CONAGUA).

As an environmental planner in the 1980s and early 1990s, I helped prepare environmental and planning documents and permits for large- scale public and private sector projects including the following: expansion of San Diego Airport, border infrastructure projects, Cannon Road improvement in Carlsbad, residential projects in eastern Chula Vista, Fallbrook Naval Weapons Station, and SR-125. All of these projects required extensive agency consultation.

Do you anticipate service to these agencies to be in conflict with a leadership position at SANDAG?

Yes No

Please explain, as needed.

Signature Date 08/31/16

Please return completed application form by 5 p.m. on Wednesday, August 31, 2016, to:

SANDAG Attn: Tessa Lero, Executive Assistant/Clerk of the Board

4 12 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101-4231 E-mail: [email protected] Tel: (619) 699-1991 Fax: (619) 699-1995

5 13 AGENDA ITEM NO. 16-11-11 BOARD OF DIRECTORS NOVEMBER 18, 2016 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

PROPOSED FY 2017 PROGRAM BUDGET AMENDMENT: File Number 1129200 OVERHEAD CONTACT SYSTEM INSULATOR AND CATCH CABLE REPLACEMENT PROJECT

Discussion Recommendation

The Overhead Contact System (OCS) Insulator and The Transportation Committee recommends Catch Cable Replacement Project is a Metropolitan that the Board of Directors accept $2.95 Transit System (MTS)-funded project included in the million from Metropolitan Transit System to SANDAG Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to fully fund the construction of the Overhead perform overhead catenary system improvements Contact System Insulator and Catch Cable along the Trolley Orange and Green lines. Replacement Project (Capital Improvement Program Project No. 1129200) and amend On September 9, 2016, SANDAG opened bids for a the FY 2017 Program Budget accordingly as portion of this work on the Orange Line and at the shown in Attachment 1. Broadway Wye. Two bids were received. The Engineer’s Estimate for the work is $2,166,100, and the low bid was $3,908,567. Analysis of the bids concluded the escalation rate for both labor and materials was higher than estimated. Additionally, the level of effort for some tasks was underestimated. The SANDAG project budget currently has insufficient funds to award the project.

This catenary work is highly specialized, and the number of firms that can perform this work is limited. Rebidding this project in the future likely would result in equal or higher bids due to potential labor cost increases. This is an important project for MTS, and it would like to fund the deficit now rather than rebid the project.

On November 4, 2016, the Transportation Committee recommended this action in anticipation of MTS approval and on November 10, 2016, the MTS Board of Directors approved an additional $2.95 million of funding to enable the contract to be awarded (see Attachment 2).

Next Steps

Pending approval of the budget amendment by the Board of Directors, the construction contract will be awarded with work anticipated to commence this winter. All work is expected to be complete by spring 2018.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachments: 1. Proposed Program Budget Amendment for CIP Project No. 1129200, OCS Catch Cable and Insulator Replacement 2. MTS Board of Directors Fund Transfer Approval November 10, 2016

Key Staff Contact: Dale Neuzil, (619) 595-5373, [email protected]

2 Attachment 1 FY 17 CAPITAL BUDGET AMENDMENT IN '000'S Project Number: 1129200 Corridor Director: Bruce Schmith RTIP Number: SAN36 Project Manager: Dale Neuzil Project Name: OCS Insulator & Catch Cable Replacement PM Phone Number: (619) 595-5373

PROJECT SCOPE SITE LOCATION PROGRESS TO DATE Installation of catch cables at all balance weight locations to comply with General Order Construction is expected to commence November 2016. 95 and replacement of aging stick insulators on the Orange and Green lines to provide better reliability.

Installation of catch cables at all balance weights locations to comply with General Order Construction is expected to commence December 2016. 95 and resetting of balance weight heights and replacement of aging stick insulators on the Orange and Green lines to provide better reliability.

PROJECT LIMITS MAJOR MILESTONES Orange Line from 12th & Imperial to Main Street in El Cajon. Green Line from County Draft Environmental Document N/A N/A Center/Little Italy to Mission San Diego and Main Street in El Cajon to Santee. Final Environmental Document N/A N/A Ready to Advertise Jun-16 Jun-16

Begin Construction Nov-16 Dec-16 Open to Public May-16 May-18 Orange Line from 12th & Imperial to Main Street in El Cajon. Green Line from Broadway Close-Out Dec-16 Dec-18 Wye to Mission San Diego and Main Street in El Cajon to Santee.

SANDAG EXPENDITURE PLAN ($000) PRIOR TASK YEARS FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 Total

Administration $210 $100 $96 $75 $75 $90 $90 $10 $10 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $485 $481

Environmental Document 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0

Design 233 60 50 50 75 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $363 $378

Right-of-Way Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0

Right-of-Way Capital 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0

Construction Support 11 13 0 410 400 600 405 290 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $1,324 $826

Construction Capital 178 128 101 1,325 1,500 3,010 3,050 270 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $4,911 $4,904

Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0

Legal Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0

Communications 0 5 0 18 12 25 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $50 $25

Project Contingency 0 75 0 100 292 172 275 136 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $483 $567 Total SANDAG $632 $381 $247 $1,978 $2,354 $3,917 $3,853 $708 $95 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,616 $7,181

OUTSIDE AGENCY EXPENDITURE PLAN ($000) PRIOR TASK YEARS FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 Total

Environmental Document $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Design 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0

Right-of-Way Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0

Right-of-Way Capital 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0

Construction Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0

Construction Capital 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 Total Caltrans $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Total SANDAG & Caltrans $632 $381 $247 $1,978 $2,354 $3,917 $3,853 $708 $95 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,616 $7,181 TransNet Pass-Through $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FUNDING PLAN ($000) PRIOR FUNDING SOURCE YEARS FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 Total FEDERAL:

FTA Section 5307 194 305 198 1,582 1,883 992 798 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $3,073 $3,073 91200001 MTS (Section 5307) 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,284 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $2,360 70270001 FTA Section 5309 312 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $312 $312 LOCAL:

91000100 TransNet - TSI 0 0 0 249 297 248 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $497 $497 91200001 MTS (Local) 0 0 0 0 0 0 571 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $590 91040000 TDA 126 76 49 146 174 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $349 $349 $632 $381 $247 $1,978 $2,354 $1,240 $3,853 $0 $95 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,231 $7,181 TOTAL:

2 Attachment 2

3 4 5 6 AGENDA ITEM NO. 16-11-12 BOARD OF DIRECTORS NOVEMBER 18, 2016 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

PROPOSED FY 2017 PROGRAM BUDGET AMENDMENT: File Number 1200508 INTERSTATE 5/VOIGT DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS

Introduction Recommendation

SANDAG, the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS), and The Transportation Committee Caltrans have been working collaboratively with the recommends that the Board of Directors University of California, San Diego (UC San Diego), approve an amendment to the FY 2017 during the last several years to plan and design Program Budget to add $5.75 million in transportation improvements for the region within State Highway Operation and Protection and adjacent to the University. The Interstate 5 Program funding to the Interstate 5 (I-5)/Voigt Drive Improvement Project is one project in (I-5)/Voigt Drive Improvement Project a portfolio being coordinated with UC San Diego.1 (Capital Improvement Program Project No. 1200508) for the construction of a At its November 4, 2016, meeting, the Transportation half-mile auxiliary lane on southbound I-5 Committee recommended that the Board of Directors between Genesee Avenue and La Jolla approve an amendment to the FY 2017 Program Village Drive in substantially the same Budget to add $5.75 million in State Highway form as shown in Attachment 1. Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) funding to the I-5/Voigt Drive Improvement Project to facilitate construction of a half-mile auxiliary lane on southbound I-5 between Genesee Avenue and La Jolla Village Drive.

Discussion

The I-5/Voigt Drive Improvement Project proposes to reconstruct the existing overcrossing with a new one that can accommodate the future I-5 North Coast Corridor Direct Access Ramp, realign the exiting Voigt Drive to accommodate the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit (Mid-Coast) Project as well as construct other operational improvements. One of these operational improvements is the construction of a half-mile auxiliary lane on southbound I-5 between Genesee Ave and La Jolla Village Drive, which will reduce conflicts between vehicles entering the freeway at Genesee Avenue and those exiting at La Jolla Village Drive. The auxiliary lane construction area also will serve as a staging area for the Mid-Coast Project as it crosses over I-5 at Voigt Drive.

1 Other projects include the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project, I-5/Genesee Avenue Interchange, Gilman Drive Bridge, and I-5 North Coast Corridor.

The auxiliary lane work could not proceed previously because of conflicts with the existing Voigt Drive Bridge. With the replacement of this bridge, the auxiliary lane may proceed, and Caltrans recently identified $5.75 million of SHOPP funds to complete the work.

Next Steps

Pending approval by the Board of Directors, a guaranteed maximum price for this work is anticipated to be negotiated with the Voigt Drive Bridge contractor (Mid-Coast Transit Constructors) this winter, and work is expected to start in mid-2017.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachment: 1. Proposed Program Budget Amendment for CIP Project No. 1200508, Interstate 5/Voigt Drive Improvements

Key Staff Contacts: Allan Kosup (619) 688-3611, [email protected] John Haggerty, (619) 699-6937, [email protected]

2 Attachment 1 FY 17 CAPITAL BUDGET AMENDMENT IN '000'S Project Number: 1200507 Corridor Director: Allan Kosup RTIP Number: CAL369 V18/CAL398a Project Manager: Arturo Jacobo Project Name: I-5/Voigt Drive Improvements PM Phone Number: (619) 688-6816

PROJECT SCOPE SITE LOCATION PROGRESS TO DATE Scope: Design for reconstruction of Voigt Drive bridge and realignment of both Approved Progress to Date: Campus Point and Voigt Drive between Lyman Lane and Genesee Avenue; design for Environmental Clearance completed under the I-5/Genesee Interchange and Widening Project southbound auxiliary lane on I-5 between La Jolla Village Drive and Genesee Avenue. (1200506) and the I-5 North Coast: 4 Express Lanes project (1200501). Design is 90 percent complete.

Updated Scope: Design for reconstruction of Voigt Drive bridge and realignment of Updated Progress to Date: both Campus Point and Voigt Drive between Lyman Lane and Genesee Avenue; design Environmental Clearance completed under the I-5/Genesee Interchange and Widening Project and construction of southbound auxiliary lane on I-5 between La Jolla Village Drive and (1200506) and the I-5 North Coast: 4 Express Lanes project (1200501). Design of the bridge Genesee Avenue. reconstruction is 90 percent complete. Design of the auxiliary lane is 95 percent complete.

PROJECT LIMITS MAJOR MILESTONES Approved Proposed Project Limits: Draft Environmental Document N/A N/A

On I-5 between La Jolla Village Drive and Genesee Avenue Final Environmental Document N/A N/A Ready to Advertise Oct-17 Jan-17

Begin Construction TBD Oct-17 Open to Public TBD Oct-21 Close-Out TBD Oct-22

SANDAG EXPENDITURE PLAN ($000) PRIOR TASK YEARS FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 Total

Administration $9 $26 $34 $24 $24 $0 $13 $0 $11 $0 $11 $0 $11 $0 $11 $0 $1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $59 $125

Environmental Document 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0

Design 869 2,473 2,323 1,314 1,373 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $4,656 $4,590

Right-of-Way Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0

Right-of-Way Capital 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0

Construction Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0

Professional Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0

Construction Capital 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,000 0 1,000 0 1,000 0 1,000 0 1,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $5,000

Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0

Legal Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0

Communications 0 0 0 10 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $10 $10

Project Contingency 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 Total SANDAG $878 $2,499 $2,357 $1,348 $1,402 $0 $1,043 $0 $1,011 $0 $1,011 $0 $1,011 $0 $1,011 $0 $1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,725 $9,725

CALTRANS EXPENDITURE PLAN ($000) PRIOR TASK YEARS FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 Total

Environmental Document $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Design 33 119 145 1,123 1,022 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $1,275 $1,275

Right-of-Way Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0

Right-of-Way Capital 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0

Construction Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 140 0 140 0 140 0 140 0 140 0 50 0 0 0 0 $0 $750

Construction Capital 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 Total Caltrans $33 $119 $145 $1,123 $1,022 $0 $215 $0 $140 $0 $140 $0 $140 $0 $140 $0 $50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,275 $2,025

Total SANDAG & Caltrans $911 $2,618 $2,502 $2,471 $2,424 $0 $1,258 $0 $1,151 $0 $1,151 $0 $1,151 $0 $1,151 $0 $51 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000 $11,750 TransNet Pass-Through $72 $38 $38 $965 $909 $0 $56 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,075 $1,075 Caltrans Pass-Through $0 $300 $94 $500 $706 $0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800 $5,800

FUNDING PLAN ($000) PRIOR FUNDING SOURCE YEARS FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 Total STATE: 85040001 SHOPP 0 600 94 200 706 0 1,000 0 1,000 0 1,000 0 1,000 0 1,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 $800 $5,800 SHOPP 0 76 102 124 98 0 140 0 140 0 140 0 140 0 140 0 50 0 0 0 0 $200 $950 LOCAL: 91000100 TransNet -MC 911 1,942 2,306 2,147 1,620 0 118 0 11 0 11 0 11 0 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 $5,000 $5,000 $911 $2,618 $2,502 $2,471 $2,424 $0 $1,258 $0 $1,151 $0 $1,151 $0 $1,151 $0 $1,151 $0 $51 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000 $11,750 TOTAL:

3

AGENDA ITEM NO. 16-11-13 BOARD OF DIRECTORS NOVEMBER 18, 2016 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

TransNet ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION PROGRAM: File Number 1200300 LAND MANAGEMENT GRANT PROGRAM: RECOMMENDED PROJECT AWARDS FOR EIGHTH CYCLE OF GRANT FUNDING

Introduction Recommendation

The TransNet Extension Ordinance and Expenditure The Regional Planning and Transportation Plan, approved by the voters in November 2004, Committees recommend that the Board of includes the Environmental Mitigation Program Directors award funding for the Eighth (EMP), which provides funding to mitigate habitat Cycle of the TransNet Environmental impacts from regional and local transportation Mitigation Program Land Management projects, and for regional land management and Grants, as shown in Attachments 1 and 2. biological monitoring. The EMP is a unique component of the TransNet Extension Ordinance in that it goes beyond traditional mitigation for transportation projects by including a funding allocation for habitat acquisition, management, and monitoring activities to help implement the regional habitat conservation plans.

Each year the SANDAG Board of Directors allocates $4 million toward implementation of regional land management and biological monitoring pursuant to a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with state and federal agencies on the implementation of the EMP. The Regional Management and Monitoring Work Plan for FY 2016-2017 allocated $1.8 million of the $4 million in available funding for the development of an eighth cycle of land management grants.

A competitive selection process is used to evaluate the grant applications. Eligible applicants include land managers from private nonprofit organizations, local jurisdictions, and other governmental agencies. This report provides the grant project rankings and the Regional Planning and Transportation Committee’s funding recommendations for the Eighth Cycle of the TransNet EMP Land Management Grant Program.

Discussion

Competitive Selection Process

On February 26, 2016, the Board of Directors approved the release of the Eighth Cycle of Grant Funding FY 2017 Call for Projects for the TransNet EMP Land Management Grants Program. A total of $1.8 million was available to address land management activities related to: (1) Threat Reduction Stewardship ($800,000); and (2) Species and Habitat Recovery ($1,000,000). The Board of Directors also approved the evaluation criteria for each of the funding categories.

The call for projects was released on March 7, 2016. At its May 10, 2016, meeting, the EMP Working Group appointed an evaluation committee to review the land management grant proposals received by SANDAG under the call for projects. The final evaluation committee consisted of EMP Working Group members who were not competing for funds including staff from the County of San Diego, U.S. Geological Survey, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, City of Carlsbad, San Diego Foundation, and SANDAG.

The call for projects closed on June 10, 2016. SANDAG received 32 proposals and distributed them to each evaluation committee member to rank and evaluate independently.

Each member of the evaluation committee reviewed the grants and scored them using the evaluation criteria adopted by the SANDAG Board of Directors. SANDAG staff collected the scores and compiled an overall list of grant projects ranked from highest to lowest. On August 17, 2016, the evaluation committee met to discuss the proposals regarding merit or shortcomings and to discuss any conditions/changes to the projects that would be recommended for funding. The ranked projects and the recommendations were presented to the EMP Working Group for discussion on September 13, 2016.

As with the past seven land management grant cycles, the evaluation committee made recommendations for full or partial funding based upon its discussions and expertise to determine if the overall intended goals of project proposals could be achieved. In addition, applicants were available by phone to address any questions regarding their proposals.

Draft Project Rankings and Funding Recommendations

The draft project evaluation rankings are reflected in the TransNet EMP Land Management Grant Program Draft Project Rankings for the Eighth Cycle of Grant Funding (Attachments 1 and 2). The evaluator’s raw scores, individual rankings, and the combined rankings by grant project are available for review at sandag.org/uploads/projectid/projectid_447_21153.pdf.

The SANDAG Technical Services Department performed an independent review, checking for consistency with the evaluation committee score sheets, and correct formulas and calculations used for scores. No errors were found during this independent review. In addition, staff performed a social equity analysis which confirmed that the projects proposed for grant funding are being distributed such that low-income and minority communities receive an equitable proportion of the benefits.

For the Threat Reduction Stewardship category, a total of 14 proposals were received. However, one proposal was withdrawn from consideration by the applicant due to inability to complete the proposed scope of work. That proposal was not reviewed by the evaluation committee and is therefore not included in Attachment 1. The total requested funding for the 13 proposals reviewed by the committee is $551,556.71. The evaluation committee recommended funding for 12 projects totaling $502,356.71. The top ranked projects recommended for funding in the Threat Reduction Stewardship category are highlighted in bold in Attachment 1.

The Threat Reduction Stewardship category originally was allocated $800,000 in funding. However, because only $502,356.71 is recommended for projects in this category, the remaining $297,643.29 is

2

recommended to be added to the Species and Habitat Restoration category, bringing the total available funding in that category to $1,297,643.29.

For the Species and Habitat Recovery category, a total of 18 proposals were received requesting $4,392,318.93 in funding. The evaluation committee recommended funding for five projects totaling $1,297,643.29. This recommendation includes approximately an additional $70,000 for the San Diego Zoo’s Native Seed Bank project so that the San Diego Zoo could provide seed to three other projects recommended for funding in the Species and Habitat Recovery category, thereby resulting in an overall cost savings for the grant program of approximately $52,000. The top-ranked projects recommended for funding in the Species and Habitat Recovery category are highlighted in bold in Attachment 2.

The EMP Working Group reviewed the evaluation committee’s recommendations on September 13, 2016, and unanimously recommended approval to the Regional Planning and Transportation Committees. On October 7, 2016, the draft project rankings and funding recommendations were presented to the Regional Planning and Transportation Committees for information. The results and recommendations also were presented to the TransNet Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee (ITOC) for discussion at its October meeting. The ITOC confirmed that the grant funding recommendations are consistent with TransNet Extension Ordinance funding eligibility requirements. The Regional Planning and Transportation Committees voted to recommend that the Board of Directors approve grant funding (as shown in Attachments 1 and 2) at their respective meetings on November 4, 2016.

Next Steps

If approved by the Board of Directors, Notices of Award will be sent for the 17 recommended projects and grant agreements are anticipated to be executed in late 2016/early 2017.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachments: 1. Short-Term Threat Reduction Stewardship Category 2. Long-Term Species and Habitat Recovery Category

Key Staff Contact: Sarah Pierce, (619) 699-7312, [email protected]

3 Attachment 1

TransNet ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION PROGRAM LAND MANAGEMENT GRANT PROGRAM PROJECT RANKINGS FOR EIGHTH CYCLE OF GRANT FUNDING: SHORT-TERM THREAT REDUCTION STEWARDSHIP CATEGORY PRJ Requested Recommended SUM of Overall Project TItle Applicant Project Summary from Proposal Discussion/Conditions # Grant Amount Grant funding Ranks RANK This project will close one of the California last remaining gaps in the Proctor CDFW_Proctor Valley Fully fund. Project builds off past success and 12 Department of Valley OHV barrier, decreasing $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 OHV Barrier 14 1 would finish fencing barrier in this area. Fish and Wildlife unauthorized access to OHV activities. Reduce a threat to the Quino County of San checkerspot butterfly by Fully fund with changes. Grantee needs to Diego - County SD_Quino enhancing habitat conditions and specify success criteria such as the amount of 14 Department of $ 44,000.00 $ 44,000.00 Habitat Restoration connectivity on a County-owned 25 2 acreage enhanced or plantago planted and must Parks and site that had previously supported review alternative access control options. Recreation a hundred or more butterflies. Fully fund with changes. Quantify success Increase the quality of habitat and criteria to include level of shrub thinning to occur improve connectivity for the City CV_Salt Creek (below 25% recommended) and work with a 20 City of Chula Vista coastal cactus wren along Salt $ 49,972.00 $ 49,972.00 Cactus Wren 30 3 biologist to ensure composted material left on Creek through shrub thinning site does not have negative impacts to crusts or within suitable wren habitat. native species. County of San Reduce threats to coastal cactus Diego - wren habitat by installing t-post Fully fund. Project is straightforward and builds County SD_Cactus 15 Department of barbless wire fencing around a $ 8,854.50 $ 8,854.50 off a previous grant. Low costs for Wren 31 4 Parks and previously restored site, and implementation. Recreation installing 8 access control signs. Fence off as many key access Fully fund with changes. Need to specify the City of San Diego - points and areas of frequent off- amount of fencing to be installed and exact Parks and road vehicle use throughout the location and target. Fencing installation needs to 17 City SD_Vernal Pools $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 Recreation Open Spring Canyon/Goat Mesa 31 4 be consistent with standardized management Space Division complex and surrounding open plan for Otay Mesa. Increase reduction in space. trespass to 75%. Enhance certain clusters of Fully fund with changes. Need to quantify cacti habitat for coastal cactus wren at City of San Diego - establishment, target survival rate etc. Achieve City SD_Bernardo Bay a 20 acre project site in Bernardo 19 Public Utilities $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 cacti establishment goals without changing Cactus Wren Bay, by planting Opuntia littoralis 37 6 Department methodologies (i.e. do not install irrigation lines (cacti) and closing unauthorized for supplemental watering). trails through the area.

Fully fund with changes. Grantee needs to Conduct thorough and systematic determine if their sites are retreatments or if The Chaparral herbicide treatment of purple veldt these are new occurrences of the species. TCLC_Crest Canyon 18 Lands grass and any other encountered $ 49,991.21 $ 49,991.21 Mapping materials should be updated. Success Veldtgrass 43 7 Conservancy invasive plant species in the Crest criteria should be updated; 90-100% reduction in Canyon Preserve. veldt grass and to 100% reduction for areas near and around target species listed.

4 TransNet ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION PROGRAM LAND MANAGEMENT GRANT PROGRAM DRAFT PROJECT RANKINGS FOR EIGHTH CYCLE OF GRANT FUNDING: SHORT-TERM THREAT REDUCTION STEWARDSHIP CATEGORY PRJ Requested Recommended SUM of Overall Project TItle Applicant Project Summary from Proposal Discussion/Conditions # Grant Amount Grant funding Ranks RANK

Fully fund with changes. Address how reinfestation of treated site will be prevented. Remove arundo donax and other Grantee needs to coordinate with adjacent land LRPC_Riparian non-native plants located in an 11 Lakeside's River owners to determine the source of arundo and 2 Restoration & Arundo acre ‘old growth’ riparian forest in $ 48,895.00 $ 48,895.00 Park Conservancy 54 8 develop a plan for future control of the species. Removal the channel of the San Diego Grantee should specify their resources available River. to maintain the project and address why this will not be a reoccurring issue.

Treat the current range of Fully fund with changes. Include language that perennial veldt grass in the San SELC_Veldt Grass San Elijo Lagoon specifies for any veldt grass found within these 16 Elijo Lagoon Ecological Reserve $ 49,003.00 $ 49,003.00 Removal Conservancy 58 9 coastal dune habitats during baseline surveys, and continue to monitor the 100% reduction will be achieved. spread or lack thereof.

Fully fund with changes. Grantee will need to Conduct surveys to determine bat coordinate with Drew Stokes and tie into existing species composition on and project as well as verify that their methods for around the Sweetwater Marsh Unit Living Coast detection are appropriate. Because monitoring 13 LCDC_Pallid Bat of the San Diego Bay National $ 15,810.00 $ 15,810.00 Discovery Center 61 10 will lead to the development of threat reduction Wildlife Refuge and establish a and management recommendation, and eventual site-specific bat habitat threat implementation of actions if bats are detected, reduction and management plan. project was qualified for grant.

Treatment of over 65 acres of Fully fund with changes. Project needs to invasive species hotspots with identify the invasive species targeted and SDAS_Silverwood San Diego herbicide and 5 acres of emergent thresholds should be a reduction in cover of 90% 10 $ 36,301.00 $ 36,301.00 Wildlife Sanctuary Audubon invasive species via hand 68 11 or greater. Funds should be focused on specific management within Silverwood species such as black mustard and star thistle Wildlife Sanctuary. rather than trying to control invasive grasses.

Fully fund with changes. Success criteria needs Coordinated removal of homeless to be increased to 100% reduction of homeless encampments and trash along the encampments and removal of trash. Grantee LRPC_San Diego River Lakeside's River San Diego River Biological needs to coordinate with local community 3 $ 49,530.00 $ 49,530.00 Channel Park Conservancy Corridor between the Santee 78 12 organizations and law enforcement regarding the border and Channel Road in timing of the events to address long term issues. Lakeside. Project may need to include access control measures to help prevent re-entry. Develop a Mobility Master Plan to Project was not recommended for funding. It does prepare for increased usage of TECC_Elfin Forest The Escondido not meet the Threat Reduction Stewardship criteria 6 EFRR and to minimize spill-over land $ 49,200.00 $ - Mobility Plan Creek Conservancy 81 13 outlined in the Call for Projects since it does not management issues on nearby include a threat reduction or management action. conserved lands. TOTAL $ 551,556.71 $ 502,356.71

5 Attachment 2

TransNet ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION PROGRAM LAND MANAGEMENT GRANT PROGRAM: PROJECT RANKINGS FOR EIGHTH CYCLE OF GRANT FUNDING: LONG-TERM SPECIES AND HABITAT RECOVERY CATEGORY

PRJ Requested Grant Recommended Proposed Match Sum of Overall Project TItle Applicant Project Summary from Proposal Comments # Amount Grant Funding Amount Ranks RANK

Funding NOT recommended for San Diego ambrosia, dehesa nolina, and Otay tarplant. Funding recommended for 6 spp. identified in proposal including San Diego thornmint, salt- marsh bird's beak, Orcutt's bird's beak, short-leaved dudleya, Mexican flannelbush, and willowy mondarella. In Establish genetically diverse, high-quality seed San Diego Zoo's addition, ICR to produce San Diego thornmint, California 7 ZS_Native Seed Bank collections for nine plant species in the $ 422,092.00 $ 492,396.00 $ 370,511.97 ICR 17 1 orcutt grass, spreading navarretia, Otay Mesa mint, Orcutt's Management Strategic Plan. birds beak, and San Diego thornmint for projects # 22, 30, and 31. Experimental work to be conducted on little mousetail. Approx $32,000 contingency to be added to year 3 project budget if needed due to environmental conditions to ensure seed availabe for other grantees.

Bulk seed for five of San Diego County's rarest The Chaparral Zoo ICR Native Seed Bank project (#7) to fill approx half of TCLC_Otay Mesa Rare plants for direct restoration in two habitat 31 Lands $ 241,319.39 $ 141,319.39 $ 152,523.37 seed bulking needs. Budget reduction of $100,000. Grantee Plants restoration projects on important conserved lands 28 2 Conservancy will coordinate with Zoo ICR for seed bulking needs. in Otay Mesa. Reduce funding required for seed bulking efforts by Implement the final three years of work to complete $11,493.53. Remaining $48,506.47 in task needed for bulking TCLC_Proctor Valley The Chaparral restoration of 19 acres of vernal pools and coastal of species not included in Zoo ICR Native Seed Bank project 30 Vernal Pools and Lands $ 405,357.43 $ 393,863.90 $ 264,227.47 sage scrub in Proctor Valley on the City of San 40 3 (#7). Grantee to adjust budget table/ schedule to include Uplands Conservancy Diego's Otay Lakes Cornerstone Lands. additional 18 months to account for any extra time needed due to poor environmental conditions.

Completion and implementation of the three site- Funding of Cardiff and Carlsbad portions only. Reduce specific restoration plans: the Cardiff State Beach project budget by $100,000. Nuttall's acmispon not located SELC_North County San Elijo Lagoon Living Shorelines Draft Habitat Restoration Plan, in project area at Torrey Pines, however occurrence of the 23 $ 297,799.00 $ 197,799.00 $ 146,616.79 Dunes 2 Conservancy SeasideTerrace Dunes Draft Habitat Restoration 46 4 species has been found within the park based on MOM data Plan, and Torrey Pines State Beach - “Black’s and may be worth re-visiting depending on success of the Beach” Draft Habitat Restoration Plan. Carlsbad and San Elijo sites.

Removal of seed bulking efforts reduces proposal cost to Mission Trails Improve and expand areas occupied by the San $72,265. Thornmint needed for project to be provided by Zoo MTRPF_SD Thornmint 22 Regional Park Diego thornmint within Mission Trails Regional Park $ 83,765.00 $ 72,265.00 $ 2,592.00 ICR Native Seed Bank project (#7). Grantee to revise scope to Restoration 56 5 Foundation (MTRP). include measurable and quantifiable success criteria (reduction of weed cover, amount of seed distrubuted etc.)

Establish additional BUOW breeding nodes through the San Diego Zoo's use of conservation breeding and releases, targeted 8 ZS_Burrowing Owl $ 540,280.00 $ - $ 167,158.00 Funding not available. ICR vegetation management, and maintenance of prioritized 59 6 artificial burrows.

Engage the community and visitors in better SDRPF_Nuttalls San Diego River management of threatened species, including the salt 26 Acmispon and Salt Marsh $ 219,150.00 $ - $ 166,700.00 Funding not available. Park Foundation marsh bird’s-beak and the Nuttall’s acmispon at the San 61 7 Birds Beak Diego River Mouth and Estuary. Land IQ_SD Thornmint Enhance and expand San Diego thornmint populations 29 Land IQ $ 240,491.20 $ - $ 36,450.40 Funding not available. Enhancement within the MU3 management unit. 62 8

Restoration of native grassland habitat at Wright’s Field, specifically to continue enhancement of the two existing Back Country Land 28 BCLT_SD Thornmint 2 San Diego thornmint populations and to establish a third $ 109,924.31 $ - $ 25,902.00 Funding not available. Trust 63 9 new population at a site where conditions are appropriate.

6 TransNet ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION PROGRAM LAND MANAGEMENT GRANT PROGRAM: DRAFT PROJECT RANKINGS FOR EIGHTH CYCLE OF GRANT FUNDING: LONG-TERM SPECIES AND HABITAT RECOVERY CATEGORY

PRJ Requested Grant Recommended Proposed Match Sum of Overall Project TItle Applicant Project Summary from Proposal Comments # Amount Grant Funding Amount Ranks RANK

The project presents a multi-tiered approach that aims to Los Pen. Lagoon 4 LPLF_Nuttall's Acimpson provide both regional and localized benefits to $ 217,500.00 $ - $ 500,000.00 Funding not available. Foundation 65 10 populations of Nuttall’s acmispon.

Improve and expand areas occupied by the Orcutt’s City CV_ Orcutts Birds bird’s-beak within Rice Canyon and Poggi Canyon 24 City of Chula Vista $ 69,770.00 $ - $ 3,900.00 Funding not available. Beak through restoration and enhancement of degraded 68 11 habitat areas.

Improve and expand areas occupied by the San Diego City CV_ San Diego thornmint within Rice Canyon, Wheeler Ridge, and Long 25 City of Chula Vista $ 194,000.00 $ - $ 4,950.00 Funding not available. Thornmint Canyon through restoration and enhancement of 68 11 degraded habitat.

Aid in recovery of California least terns by increasing breeding productivity of in Mission Bay Park and 11 SDAS_Ternwatchers2 San Diego Audubon $ 60,517.00 $ - $ 19,437.00 Funding not available. increasing efficacy of predator control measures at 74 13 active nesting sites.

Endangered Habitat restoration of the 147-acre Hanson pond 9 EHC_Hanson Pond Habitats $ 273,455.60 $ - $ 31,250.00 Funding not available. property in the El Monte Valley Lakeside. 76 14 Conservancy

Develop an effective Integrative Pest Management program to prevent further spread and manage impacts 32 UCR_Shot Hole Borer U.C. Riverside $ 434,818.00 $ - $ 85,695.00 Funding not available. from the Fusarium Dieback-Shot Hole Borer pest- 83 15 pathogen complex.

Restore 13 acres of the 83-acre Furby-North Property by 21 County SD_Furby North 2 County of SD removing and treating invasive non-native plant species $ 246,000.00 $ - $ 25,875.00 83 15 Funding not available. that are infesting the Property.

Remove exotic forbs within five feet of individual The Escondido Dudleya viscida plants and establish a 100-foot buffer 5 TECC_Sticky Dudleya $ 87,000.00 $ - $ 43,375.00 Funding not available. Creek Conservancy zone around the population where large flammable 84 17 exotic plants are removed.

BCLT_Clover Flat and Back Country Land Conduct habitat restoration and enhancement on the 27 $ 249,080.00 $ - $ 24,119.00 Funding not available. SDMR Trust Clover FlatsSan Diego Mountain Ranch properties. 101 18

TOTAL $ 4,392,318.93 $ 1,297,643.29 $ 2,071,283.00

7 AGENDA ITEM NO. 16-11-14 BOARD OF DIRECTORS NOVEMBER 18, 2016 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

REGIONAL SHORELINE MONITORING PROGRAM File Number 3200200

Introduction Recommendation

The Shoreline Preservation Working Group advises The Regional Planning Committee the Regional Planning Committee on issues relating recommends that the Board of Directors to the implementation of the Shoreline Preservation continue the Regional Shoreline Strategy and Coastal Regional Sediment Monitoring Program (Program) for an Management Plan. These documents, adopted by the additional five years based on the FY 2018 SANDAG Board of Directors, outline the beach Estimated Program Cost. The Board of building and maintenance strategy for the region’s Directors also is asked to authorize the shoreline areas and address how sediment Executive Director to execute all management targeted at coastal erosion can be documents necessary to implement the implemented in a cost effective and resource Program. protective manner.

In furtherance of the goals and objectives laid out in these documents, the Regional Planning Committee recommends that the Board of Directors continue the Regional Shoreline Monitoring Program (Program).

The Program has been funded by the region’s coastal cities since it was initiated by SANDAG in 1996. This comprehensive approach to monitoring the shoreline provides data that can document changes across the region’s shoreline over time that could not be obtained by any one jurisdiction alone. The Program measures the changes in beach width over time, documents the benefits of sand replenishment projects, and helps to improve the design and effectiveness of beach sand nourishment projects, as well as emerging efforts to develop living shoreline projects.

Discussion

The Program provides physical measurements of the region’s beaches essential to the design and evaluation of efforts to manage the region’s shoreline. Success of the Program depends on the continuation of the basic components. These components include beach monitoring (38 transects and biannual aerial photography) and lagoon entrance monitoring (closure and maintenance records and aerial photography). Consistency over time has allowed trends to be seen, which have been used to plan projects such as the Regional Beach Sand Projects (RBSP) (RBSP I and RBSP II), as well as lagoon restoration and maintenance dredging. In addition, monitoring conducted as part of this Program is essential to understanding the longevity and effectiveness of beach sand nourishment projects in the region. Research conducted by Dr. Philip King from San Francisco State

University indicates that beaches provide recreational opportunities and property protection thereby providing significant economic return for local jurisdictions.1,2 Data collected as part of this Program can be used to further evaluate the benefit cost ratios of such projects and serve as a tool to help planners craft sea level rise adaptation measures as part of local coastal program updates and climate adaptation plans.

Program Accomplishments

The Program has allowed staff to track the performance and longevity of beach nourishment activities associated with RBSP I and RBSP II. In addition, this 20-year data set has documented changes in the condition of the shorezone,3 thereby providing a basis for evaluating the impacts of natural events (such as El Niño) and human intervention (including beach nourishment, sediment bypassing, lagoon modification, shoreline/bluff armoring, and potential sediment retention structures that may be considered in the future). The monitoring results provide a quantitative basis for prioritizing erosion mitigation efforts, including locations and quantities of nourishment material and the potential implementation of living shoreline projects and sediment retention structures. Moreover, this data has helped to provide an understanding of coastal processes and the overall state of the region’s coastline to residents, city staff, and local leadership.

Cost

Currently the Program is funded through the end of FY 2017. If approved by the Board of Directors, funding for the Program would continue for another five years based on the estimated costs shown in Attachment 1. The estimated cost of the Program for FY 2018 is $134,154, and as noted in Attachment 1, would be expected to increase by approximately 3 percent per year due to inflation. Each year, Program costs would be proportionately broken down by each coastal jurisdiction based on miles of sandy shoreline, excluding federal lands. This methodology for funding has been used to determine costs for the last five years of the Program. Exact Program costs would be based upon a negotiated bid with a qualified contractor.

This information was presented to the Shoreline Preservation Working Group on September 1, 2016, and the Regional Planning Committee on October 7, 2016. Both groups are unanimously recommending approval to the SANDAG Board of Directors for the continuation of the Program.

1 King et al. The Economic Costs of Sea-Level Rise to California Beach Communities. http://www.dbw.ca.gov/PDF/Reports/CalifSeaLevelRise.pdf

2 SANDAG. 2007. Feasibility Study San Diego Regional Beach Sand Replenishment Project.

3 The shorezone generally extends from the back of the beach, offshore to the depth of closure (the depth at which sediment is no longer moving under the influence of waves and currents). It is the portion of the nearshore that is influenced by waves and currents.

2 Next Steps

If continuation of the Program is approved by the Board of Directors, SANDAG staff will begin the contract procurement process. The consultant team is anticipated to be chosen by the beginning of FY 2018 so monitoring can begin in fall 2017 to avoid any gaps in the data.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachment: 1. FY 2018 Estimated Regional Shoreline Monitoring Program Cost

Key Staff Contacts: Sarah Pierce, (619) 699-7312, [email protected] Keith Greer, (619) 699-7390, [email protected]

3 Attachment 1

FY 2018 Estimated Regional Shoreline Monitoring Program Cost

Jurisdiction Shoreline (miles)1 % of Total Estimated FY 2018 Cost 2,3

Carlsbad 6.5 14.90% $19,989 Coronado 3.1 7.10% $9,525 Del Mar 3 6.90% $9,257 Encinitas 5.8 13.30% $ 17,842 Imperial Beach 2.7 6.20% $8,318 Oceanside 3.6 8.30% $11,135 San Diego 17.3 39.80% $53,393 Solana Beach 1.5 3.50% $4,695 Total 43.5 100% $134,154 Notes:

1. Miles of sandy shoreline, excluding federal lands. 2. Total cost estimate includes beach transect monitoring and lagoon entrance monitoring. 3. Costs are expected to increase three percent per year over the duration of a five-year agreement.

4 Interstate 5 / Voigt Drive Improvements

1

Portfolio of Projects N

2

1 North

3

Recommendation

The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors approve an amendment to the FY 2017 Program Budget to add $5.75 million in State Highway Operation and Protection Program funding to the Interstate 5 (I‐5)/Voigt Drive Improvement Project (Capital Improvement Project 1200508) for the construction of a half‐mile auxiliary lane on southbound I‐5 between Genesee Avenue and La Jolla Village Drive as shown in Attachment 1.

4

2 Environmental Mitigation Program Land Management Grant Program: Recommended Project Awards For Eighth Cycle of Grant Funding

Board of Directors | November 18, 2016

Land Management Grants

. Seven previous cycles . 81 grants awarded . $12.8 million awarded . $8.4 million in matching funds . Applications for eighth cycle of funding submitted in June 2016

2

1 3

4

2 5

Threat Reduction Species and Habitat Stewardship Recovery

. Three‐ to five‐year projects . 18‐month projects . Habitat restoration/ enhancement . “Gap funding” projects . $50,000 cap per grant . Five projects recommended . 12 projects recommended totaling $1,297,643 totaling $502,356

6

3 Recommendation

The Regional Planning and Transportation Committees recommend that the Board of Directors award funding for the Eighth Cycle of the TransNet Environmental Mitigation Program Land Management Grants, as shown in Attachments 1 and 2.

7

4 Regional Shoreline Monitoring Program

Board of Directors

November 18, 2016

Regional Shoreline Monitoring • Began in 1996 • Oceanside to Imperial Beach • Guided selection of beaches for 2001 and 2012 RBSPs • Program components: – Beach profiles – Lagoon entrance monitoring – Shoreline photography

2

1 March 1998

March 2016

2 Lessons Learned • Document erosion “hotspots” • Evaluate performance of RBSP nourishment • Provide objective foundation for residents, staff, and decision makers • Assess El Niño storm impacts

5

Data Use

• Online data set • Determination of existing conditions and future trends • Development and monitoring of RBSP II • Foundation for climate change

adaptation measures Source: beachapedia.org

6

3 New Five‐Year Agreement

• Current contract to expire after Spring 2017 survey • Methodology for funding shown in Attachment 1 – Based on miles of sandy shoreline, excluding federal lands • Exact program costs based on negotiated bid with contractor

7

Recommendation

The Regional Planning Committee recommends that the Board of Directors continue the Regional Shoreline Monitoring Program (Program) for an additional five years based on the FY 2018 Estimated Program Cost. The Board of Directors also is asked to authorize the Executive Director to execute all documents necessary to implement the Program.

8

4