DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Shell Rock River Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Shell Rock River Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy Watershed May 2021 Shell Rock River Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy Report e. Right click on this picture, choose Change picture, click on th pi Authors Bill Thompson; MPCA Ashley Ignatius; MPCA Emily Zanon; MPCA Contributors/acknowledgements Andy Henschel; Shell Rock River Watershed District Brenda Lageson; Freeborn County SWCD Cody Fox; Freeborn County Courtney Phillips; Shell Rock River Watershed District Dalton Syverson; City of Albert Lea Kristen Dieterman; MPCA Lindsey Zeitler; Freeborn County SWCD Paul Brietzke; MPCA Rachel Wehner; Freeborn County Steven Jahnke; City of Albert Lea Winston Beiser; Freeborn County Cover photo descriptions (clockwise, from upper left): Shell Rock River near Gordonsville, Minnesota Agricultural drainage ditch in the Peter Lund Creek Subwatershed Jerad Stricker of the Shell Rock River Watershed District takes a water elevation measurement from the bridge over the channel between Fountain and Albert Lea lakes. City of Albert Lea’s wastewater treatment plant outfall to the Shell Rock River The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs by using the Internet to distribute reports and information to wider audience. Visit our website for more information. The MPCA reports are printed on 100% post-consumer recycled content paper manufactured without chlorine or chlorine derivatives. Document number: wq-ws4-70a Contents List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................ ii List of Figures ...................................................................................................................................... iii 1. Watershed background and description ....................................................................................... 1 1.1 Watershed Characteristics ................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Subwatersheds ................................................................................................................................. 22 1.3 Lake Characteristics ......................................................................................................................... 24 2. Watershed conditions ................................................................................................................ 26 2.1 Water Quality Conditions ................................................................................................................. 32 2.2 Water quality trends ........................................................................................................................ 62 2.3 Stressors and pollutant sources ....................................................................................................... 63 2.4 TMDL summary ................................................................................................................................ 96 2.5 Protection considerations ................................................................................................................ 99 3. Prioritizing and implementing restoration ................................................................................ 100 3.1 Comprehensive Local BMP Assessments ....................................................................................... 102 3.2 Civic engagement, accomplishments and public participation ...................................................... 118 3.3 Restoration strategies .................................................................................................................... 121 4. Monitoring plan ....................................................................................................................... 136 5. References and further information ......................................................................................... 139 6. Appendix .................................................................................................................................. 147 Shell Rock River WRAPS Report Minnesota Pollution Control Agency i List of Tables Table 1. Farm size distribution in Freeborn County. ..................................................................................... 9 Table 2. Acres and percentages of crops grown in Freebon County (CDL 2019). ....................................... 12 Table 3. Drainage classes in the SRRW. ...................................................................................................... 15 Table 4. Number of public drainage systems and associated percent of open ditch. ................................ 16 Table 5. Shell Rock River Watershed lakes. ................................................................................................ 25 Table 6. Watershed Health Index Scores for the SRRW (DNR 2019). ......................................................... 26 Table 7. General Use - Preliminary Draft Use Designations under TALU. ................................................... 27 Table 8. Modified Use – Preliminary Draft Use Designations under TALU. ................................................ 27 Table 9. Assessment summary of streams in the SRRW. ............................................................................ 30 Table 10. Assessed streams in the SRRW. .................................................................................................. 35 Table 11: Assessment status of stream reaches in the Shell Rock River, presented from upstream to downstream for the 12 river miles in WID 07080202-501. ........................................................................ 36 Table 12. Mean and median pollutant concentrations in the Shell Rock River. ......................................... 38 Table 13. Pollutant flow-weighted mean concentrations and mass in the Shell Rock River (average for 2009-2016). ................................................................................................................................................. 39 Table 14. Flow-weighted mean dissolved orthophosphate and total phosphorus concentrations in the Shell Rock River, 2013 to 2015, with DOP/TP ratios. .................................................................................. 40 Table 15. Total suspended solid data summary from other streams and tributaries. ............................... 51 Table 16. E. coli concentrations for Bancroft Creek and Wedge Creek. ..................................................... 54 Table 17. Assessment status of lakes in the Shell Rock River Watershed. ................................................. 55 Table 18. Fountain Lake growing season means for chl-a and secchi disk transparency. .......................... 57 Table 19. Albert Lea Lake growing for chlorophyll a and secchi disk transparency. .................................. 60 Table 20. Pickeral Lake growing season means for chlorophyll a and secchi disk transparency (2009- 2018). .......................................................................................................................................................... 60 Table 21. White Lake growing season means for chlorophyll a and secchi disk transparency (2009-2018). .................................................................................................................................................................... 62 Table 22. Trends in the Shell Rock River Watershed for Monitoring Station S000-084; At bridge on CSAH- 1, 1 mile west of Gordonsville (SR-1.2), 1961-2009. From MPCA 2014c. ................................................... 63 Table 23. Primary stressors to aquatic life in the biologically impaired reach of the Shell Rock River (MPCA 2014b). ............................................................................................................................................ 64 Table 24. Orthophosphorus: Total Phosphorus ratios for six tributaries in the SRRW, 2009-2011; Ulrich 2014. ........................................................................................................................................................... 78 Table 25. Wedge Creek Subwatershed estimated manure production and estimated phosphorus nutrient value. ........................................................................................................................................................... 80 Table 26. Bancroft Creek Subwatershed estimated manure production and estimated phosphorus nutrient value. ............................................................................................................................................. 80 Table 27. Lake internal load allocations for Shell Rock River Watershed TMDL (RESPEC 2020). ............... 83 Table 28. Factors associated with bacterial presence (MPCA 2015). ......................................................... 84 Table 29: Nonpoint sources in the Shell Rock River Watershed. Relative magnitudes of contributing sources are indicated. ................................................................................................................................. 88 Table 30. Animal units and animal count of registered feedlots in SRRW. ................................................ 90 Table 31. Point sources in the Shell Rock River Watershed........................................................................ 93 Table 32. Range of annual reported parameter loads from SRRW wastewater treatment facilities. ........ 95
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Physical Characteristics of Stream Subbasins in The
    PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF STREAM SUBBASINS IN THE SANOCKI PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF STREAM RIVER,SUBBASINS THE UPPER IN CEDAR RIVER, UPPER WAPSIPINICON ROCK SHELL ANDRIVER, UPPER WAPSIPINICON RIVER, UPPER CEDAR RIVER, SHELL ROCK OFR 99-471 RIVER, AND WINNEBAGO RIVER BASINS, SOUTHERN MINNESOTA AND NORTHERN IOWA MINNESOTA SOUTHEASTERN BASINS, RIVER, WINNEBAGO By Christopher A. Sanocki Open-File Report 99-471 Prepared in cooperation with the Minnesota Department of Transportation 99-471 OFR Mounds View, Minnesota 2000 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey 3K\VLFDO &KDUDFWHULVWLFV RI 6WUHDP 6XEEDVLQV LQ WKH 8SSHU :DSVLSLQLFRQ 5LYHU 8SSHU &HGDU 5LYHU 6KHOO 5RFN 5LYHU DQG :LQQHEDJR 5LYHU %DVLQV 6RXWKHUQ 0LQQHVRWD DQG 1RUWKHUQ ,RZD %\ &KULVWRSKHU $ 6DQRFNL $EVWUDFW Data that describe the physical characteristics of stream subbasins upstream from selected sites on streams in the Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper Cedar River, Shell Rock River, and Winnebago River Basins, located in southern Minnesota and northern Iowa are presented in this report. The physical characteristics are the drainage area of the subbasin, the percentage area of the subbasin covered only by lakes, the percentage area of the subbasin covered by both lakes and marsh, the main-channel length, and the main-channel slope. Stream sites include outlets of subbasins of at least 5 square miles, and locations of U.S. Geological Survey high-flow, and continuous-record gaging stations. ,QWURGXFWLRQ Selected data for sites on streams at outlets of subbasins larger than about 5 square miles; at This is the 16th report in a series detailing locations of U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) high- subbasin characteristics of streams in Minnesota flow, and continuous-record gaging stations and adjacent states.
    [Show full text]
  • Goodhue County Minnesota
    R18W R17W R16W R15W R14W R13W R12W Rosemount Hastings Coates 27000 20000 23000 25000 29000 21000 31000 22000 28000 30000 11000 26000 32000 10000 35000 37000 09000 08000 34000 36000 07000 19000 33000 16000 17000 15000 3 24000 02000 04000 13000 18000 01000 03000 05000 00000 12000 14000 06000 Mud Hen Mississippi River 17000 Vermillion River Lake 17000 G¹ 10 ?¼ Gores Pool #3 WMA 11 18000 Sharp iI 18000 Muskrat Lake 15 Twin 14 Lakes Mississippi River 13 Vermillion GÀ !y u" Upper Clear Lake T114N 19000 190TH 19000 ST WY T114N 23 19 22 North 24 Lake Gores DAKOTA CIR DAKOTA n GÎ Pool " #3 WMA PRAIRIE ISLAND BLVD Brewer Lake 20000 PIERCE COUNTY 20000 202ND ST WY 205TH ST E RO WAN AV RO WAN c Clear 30 Diamond " 27 25 RED Lake 26 Bluff 29 WING 207TH ST E CHURCH RD RAVENNA TR 28 b Sturgeon " 21000 21000 BLVD G¹ 36 Lake Lower Rattling Nelson PRAIRIE 32 34 Springs Lake PINE WY 31 Lake 33 218TH ST E 218TH 35 218TH DAKOTA CO. TR RAVENNA ST WY ST WY 155TH AV WY !y 22000 22000 Larson V Lake 6 A -ÕA 4 165TH 225TH Brunner Indian Slough 6 5 H 3 2 1 5 T ST Lake 5 228TH 4 ?¼ 4 (! Eggleston 1 A ST WY Goose 230TH ST E 230TH ST V Lake E Birch Lake WISCONSIN 23000 23000 235TH Wildcat ST WY Lake 155TH AV 235 ST WY Gores ¼ Hampton 235TH BRINK RD 8 Jones " 7 8 9 10 9 Pool #3 11 ST WY 12 7 Ve Lake WMA rmi Pickerel ll Slough ion 10 Ri 11 175TH AV WY AV v New Trier Miesville RD e !y -ÕA r 12 -ÕA BUNCH Rice Lake Hager 24000 24000 Bottoms Upper Mississippi River City Round Welch Twp Red Wing 160TH AV WY AV 244TH DOYLES RD Lake 13 ?¼ 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 16 15 Wildlife
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Summaries of Selected Iowa Streamflow Data--Table 1
    Table 1 1 Table 1. Streamgages in Iowa included in this study. [no., number] Map Streamgage number Streamgage name Link to streamflow statistics for streamgage number (fig. 1) 1 05387440 Upper Iowa River at Bluffton, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05387440_stats.docx 2 05387500 Upper Iowa River at Decorah, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05387500_stats.docx 3 05388000 Upper Iowa River near Decorah, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05388000_stats.docx 4 05388250 Upper Iowa River near Dorchester, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05388250_stats.docx 5 05388500 Paint Creek at Waterville, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05388500_stats.docx 6 05389000 Yellow River near Ion, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05389000_stats.docx 7 05389400 Bloody Run Creek near Marquette, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05389400_stats.docx 8 05389500 Mississippi River at McGregor, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05389500_stats.docx 9 05411400 Sny Magill Creek near Clayton, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05411400_stats.docx 10 05411600 Turkey River at Spillville, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05411600_stats.docx 11 05411850 Turkey River near Eldorado, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05411850_stats.docx 12 05412000 Turkey River at Elkader, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05412000_stats.docx 13 05412020 Turkey River above French Hollow Creek at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05412020_stats.docx
    [Show full text]
  • Quarrernary GEOLOGY of MINNESOTA and PARTS of ADJACENT STATES
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Ray Lyman ,Wilbur, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director P~ofessional Paper 161 . QUArrERNARY GEOLOGY OF MINNESOTA AND PARTS OF ADJACENT STATES BY FRANK LEVERETT WITH CONTRIBUTIONS BY FREDERICK w. SARDE;30N Investigations made in cooperation with the MINNESOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1932 ·For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract ________________________________________ _ 1 Wisconsin red drift-Continued. Introduction _____________________________________ _ 1 Weak moraines, etc.-Continued. Scope of field work ____________________________ _ 1 Beroun moraine _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 47 Earlier reports ________________________________ _ .2 Location__________ _ __ ____ _ _ __ ___ ______ 47 Glacial gathering grounds and ice lobes _________ _ 3 Topography___________________________ 47 Outline of the Pleistocene series of glacial deposits_ 3 Constitution of the drift in relation to rock The oldest or Nebraskan drift ______________ _ 5 outcrops____________________________ 48 Aftonian soil and Nebraskan gumbotiL ______ _ 5 Striae _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 48 Kansan drift _____________________________ _ 5 Ground moraine inside of Beroun moraine_ 48 Yarmouth beds and Kansan gumbotiL ______ _ 5 Mille Lacs morainic system_____________________ 48 Pre-Illinoian loess (Loveland loess) __________ _ 6 Location__________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • SNA Statewide
    A B C D E F G H I J Manitoba MINNESOTA 1 CANADA SCIENTIFIC AND 1 Lake of the ^ Woods ^Sprague Creek Pine Creek Peatland Peatland NATURAL Roseau (! ^ Pine & Curry Island (! Hallock Lake Bronson Ontario Parkland Winter Road AREAS KITTSON ^ ROSEAU Lake Peatland ^ (! ^ Luxemberg ^ Baudette Peatland Two Rivers ^ LAKE OF THE WOODS Aspen International Falls Prairie Norris Camp Peatland (! 2 Watrous West Rat Root Natural places worth knowing 2 Parkland 59 ^ ^ ^ North Black Island^ River Peatland Mulligan Lake Gustafson's Camp River ^ ^ Peatland Peatland East Rat Root River 53 Peatland MARSHALL ^ Natural areas are exceptional places 75 South Black where native plants and animals flourish; River where rare species are protected; ^ Peatland (! Warren Red Lake Peatland KOOCHICHING and where we can know, and study, Minnesota’s fascinating natural features. (! Thief River Falls Upper Red Lake ^ 71 Big PENNINGTON Lost River Peatland Myrtle Lake Island Peatland ^ ^ Nett Lake ^ Peatland Caldwell Brook COOK 3 Lower Red Lake Cedar Swamp Burntside 3 Red Islands Hovland Woods Lake (! ^ Potato ^ ^ (! Ely ^Spring Beauty Northern Hardwoods Falls RED LAKE Lake ^ Myhr Creek Ridge^ Malmberg ^Kawishiwi Pines (! Crookston ^ BELTRAMI Lost Lake^ ^^ Prairie Gully Fen Eagles' Nest ^ Peatland Purvis Lake-Ober (! 2 ^Lost 40 Island No. 4 Foundation ^ Grand Marais POLK ^ ^ Lutsen Pembina 53 Butterwort Cliffs Ladies ^ Trail LAKE Little ^ Tresses Too Much Swamp CLEARWATER Lake Agassiz Dunes Bagley ST. LOUIS ^ Sand Lake Peatland ^ (! 75 Pennington Bog ^ ^ ITASCA (! 169 ^Sugarloaf
    [Show full text]
  • Delineation Percentage
    Lake Superior - North Rainy River - Headwaters Lake Superior - South Vermilion River Nemadji River Cloquet River Pine River Rainy River - Rainy Lake Little Fork River Mississippi River - Headwaters Leech Lake River Upper St. Croix River Root River Big Fork River Mississippi River - Winona Upper/Lower Red Lake Kettle River Mississippi River - Lake Pepin Mississippi River - Grand Rapids Mississippi River - La Crescent Crow Wing River Otter Tail River Mississippi River - Reno Mississippi River - Brainerd Zumbro River Redeye River Upper Big Sioux River Mississippi River - Twin Cities Snake River Des Moines River - Headwaters St. Louis River Rum River Lower Big Sioux River Lower St. Croix River Cottonwood River Minnesota River - Headwaters Cannon River Mississippi River - St. Cloud Long Prairie River Lake of the Woods Lower Rainy North Fork Crow River Mississippi River - Sartell Lac Qui Parle River Buffalo River Wild Rice River Minnesota River - Mankato Sauk River Rock River Redwood River Snake River Chippewa River Watonwan River Clearwater River East Fork Des Moines River Red River of the North - Sandhill River Upper Red River of the North Blue Earth River Red River of the North - Marsh River Roseau River Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River Le Sueur River Little Sioux River Bois de Sioux River Cedar River Lower Minnesota River Pomme de Terre River Red Lake River Lower Des Moines River Upper Iowa River Red River of the North - Tamarac River Shell Rock River Two Rivers Rapid River Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek Mustinka River South Fork Crow River Thief River Winnebago River Upper Wapsipinicon River 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% %Altered %Natural %Impounded %No Definable Channel wq-bsm1-06.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Trends at Minnesota Milestone Sites
    Water Quality Trends for Minnesota Rivers and Streams at Milestone Sites Five of seven pollutants better, two getting worse June 2014 Author The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs by using the Internet to distribute reports and David Christopherson information to wider audience. Visit our website for more information. MPCA reports are printed on 100% post- consumer recycled content paper manufactured without chlorine or chlorine derivatives. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | www.pca.state.mn.us | 651-296-6300 Toll free 800-657-3864 | TTY 651-282-5332 This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us . Document number: wq-s1-71 1 Summary Long-term trend analysis of seven different water pollutants measured at 80 locations across Minnesota for more than 30 years shows consistent reductions in five pollutants, but consistent increases in two pollutants. Concentrations of total suspended solids, phosphorus, ammonia, biochemical oxygen demand, and bacteria have significantly decreased, but nitrate and chloride concentrations have risen, according to data from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s (MPCA) “Milestone” monitoring network. Recent, shorter-term trends are consistent with this pattern, but are less pronounced. Pollutant concentrations show distinct regional differences, with a general pattern across the state of lower levels in the northeast to higher levels in the southwest. These trends reflect both the successes of cleaning up municipal and industrial pollutant discharges during this period, and the continuing challenge of controlling the more diffuse “nonpoint” polluted runoff sources and the impacts of increased water volumes from artificial drainage practices.
    [Show full text]
  • (RFP) Project Title: ENRTF ID: 094-B
    Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2018 Request for Proposals (RFP) Project Title: ENRTF ID: 094-B ShellRock River Watershed Stormwater Quality Trading Pilot Program Category: B. Water Resources Total Project Budget: $ 350,000 Proposed Project Time Period for the Funding Requested: 2 years, July 2018 to June 2020 Summary: This project will develop and implement a model stormwater water quality credit trading framework. The purpose is to provide voluntary, cost effective, pollutant reductions on a watershed scale. Name: Courtney Christensen Sponsoring Organization: Shell Rock River Watershed District Address: 214 West Main Street Albert Lea MN 56007 Telephone Number: (507) 377-5785 Email [email protected] Web Address www.shellrock.org Location Region: Southeast County Name: Freeborn City / Township: Albert Lea Alternate Text for Visual: The attached visual aid is an exhibit showing the intended credit trading process and proposal. _____ Funding Priorities _____ Multiple Benefits _____ Outcomes _____ Knowledge Base _____ Extent of Impact _____ Innovation _____ Scientific/Tech Basis _____ Urgency _____ Capacity Readiness _____ Leverage _______ TOTAL ______% Page 1 of 8 07/29/2017 ENRTF ID: 094-B PROJECT TITLE: Shell Rock River Watershed Stormwater Quality Trading Pilot Program I. PROJECT STATEMENT The Stormwater Water Quality Trading Pilot Program (the “Program”) for the Shell Rock River Watershed District will develop and implement the state’s first water quality credit trading program for stormwater. Water quality trading is an innovative, voluntary, and cost effective methodology that can accelerate pollution reduction. This Program is a collaborative effort between the watershed district, the City of Albert Lea, and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Cannon River Watershed Assessment
    This page was left blank intentionally for printing purpose 2 Part A Section 2-Table of Contents PART A SECTION 2-TABLE OF CONTENTS...................................................................................3 PART A SECTION 3 LISTS OF TABLES, CHARTS, FIGURES AND MAPS................................5 SECTION 3A-LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................5 SECTION 3B-LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................6 SECTION 3C-LIST OF MAPS ......................................................................................................................6 PART A SECTION 4 OVERALL INFORMATION............................................................................7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................7 PART A SECTION 5 OVERALL WATERSHED INFORMATION...............................................10 SECTION 5A-HISTORY OF THE CANNON RIVER WATERSHED .................................................................10 PART A SECTION 5B-WATERSHED INFORMATION..................................................................................12 Bedrock Geology...............................................................................................................................12 Topography.......................................................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • MN Association of Watershed Districts – 2020 Dues
    Minnesota Association of Watershed Districts, Inc. www.mnwatershed.org l 651-440-9407 Memo DATE: January 16, 2020 TO: Watershed District Administrators FROM: Emily Javens, Executive Director CC: MAWD President Mary Texer, Treasurer Sherry Davis White, Co-Treasurer Jackie Anderson MAWD Accountant Angie Fischer Obremski RE: 2020 ANNUAL DUES STATEMENT Please find attached the 2020 MAWD Membership Dues Worksheet that shows the amounts due from each watershed organization to be members of MAWD this year. The dues formula remained the same from last year, but your dues amount may have gone up or down based on the updated taxable market values for your watershed. The current dues payment for watershed districts is equal to 0.5% of each watershed district’s maximum general levy as defined in statute (before applying the $250,000 levy limit), not to exceed $7,500. Dues for water management organizations will remain at $500 for 2020. 2020 WD Dues = 2017 Taxable Market Value x 0.00048 x 0.005, not to exceed $7,500 2019 WMO Dues = $500 Please remit payment by February 28, 2020 to the MAWD Accountant: MN Association of Watershed Districts c/o Obremski Ltd. 1005 Mainstreet Hopkins, MN 55343 Thank you for your support! Attachments: 2020 MAWD Dues Worksheet BWSR Memo dated July 17, 2018 re: 2018 Taxable Market Values Minnesota Association of Watershed Districts, Inc. | 595 Aldine Street | St. Paul, MN 55104 www.mnwatershed.org 2020 MAWD Membership Dues WATERSHED DISTRICT NAME Estimated Market Values 2020 MAWD Dues BEAR VALLEY 221,457,700 531 BELLE CREEK 415,815,100 998 BOIS DE SIOUX 4,559,626,000 7,500 BROWN'S CREEK 1,938,920,100 4,653 BUFFALO CREEK 2,322,046,700 5,573 BUFFALO-RED RIVER 8,958,175,200 7,500 CAPITOL REGION 22,568,389,100 7,500 CARNELIAN MARINE ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Workplan
    Attachment A Project Workplan Doc Type: Contract MPCA Use Only Swift #: 130553 CR #: 195017-PRO20170001 Project Title: Mississippi River Brainerd WRAPS Phase II 1. Project Summary: Organization: Aitkin County SWCD Contractor contact name: Janet Smude Title: District Technician Address: 130 Southgate Drive Aitkin, MN 56431 Phone: 218-927-6565 E-mail: [email protected] Subcontractor: Organization: RESPEC Project manager: Julie Blackburn Address: 1935 County Road B2 W, Suite 230 Roseville, MN 55113 Phone: 651-305-2272 E-mail: [email protected] Partner(s) Local Partner Team (LPT): Organization: Morrison Soil & Water Conservation District Project manager: Helen McLennan Phone: 320-616-2479 E-mail: [email protected] Organization: Crow Wing Soil & Water Conservation District Project manager: Melissa Barrick Phone: 218-828-6197 E-mail: [email protected] Organization: Todd Soil & Water Conservation District Project manager: Shannon Wettstein Phone: 320-732-2644 E-mail: [email protected] MPCA contact(s): www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • Use your preferred relay service • Available in alternative formats e-admin9-38 • 3/11/16 Page 1 of 6 MPCA project manager: Bonnie Finnerty Title: Watershed Project Manager Address: 7678 College Road Suite 105 Baxter, MN 56425 Phone: 218-316-3897 E-mail: [email protected] Project information Latitude/Longitude: N/A *County: Aitkin, Crow Wing, Morrison, Todd Start date: 09/15/2017 End date: 12/31/2020 Total cost: $249,945.12 *Full time equivalents: 1.50 *Major watershed(s): Statewide Kettle River Miss Rvr – GrandRpds Lower Rainy Rvr So Fork Crow River Big Fork River Lac Qui Parle River Miss Rvr –Headwaters Rainy Lake Lower St.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Wapsipinicon River Watershed WRAPS Report (Wq-Ws4-67A)
    Watershed February 2020 Upper Wapsipinicon River Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy Report Authors and Contributors Emily Zanon, MPCA Ashley Ignatius, MPCA Bill Thompson, MPCA Justin Watkins, MPCA Joe Magee, MPCA Jason Carlson, DNR Jennifer Ronnenberg, MDH Angie Knish, Mower Co. James Fett, Mower Co. SWCD Justin Hanson, Mower Co. SWCD Antonio Arenas Amado, Iowa Flood Center/IIHR Cover photo credit: Joe Magee The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs by using the Internet to distribute reports and information to wider audience. Visit our website for more information. The MPCA reports are printed on 100% post-consumer recycled content paper manufactured without chlorine or chlorine derivatives. Document number: wq-ws4-67a Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................................. 3 List of tables............................................................................................................................................ 3 List of figures .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Key terms and abbreviations .................................................................................................................. 5 Executive summary ................................................................................................................................. 6 What is the WRAPS Report? ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]