DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Resident Submissions to the Newcastle City Council Electoral Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Resident Submissions to the Newcastle City Council Electoral Review Local resident submissions to the Newcastle City Council electoral review This PDF document contains submissions from Local Residents. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Newcastle upon Tyne District Personal Details: Name: Peter Alexander E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: As a resident of Abbey Farm Estate North Walbottle I find that being included in the Newburn ward to be frustrating. Councilors for this ward concentrate their effors on Newburn & Throckley areas. The estate has more in common with that of Westerhope with the majority of primary children attending school either in Westerhope or denton wards and high school children bussing out to Ponteland schools. Most of our services eg doctors etc are based in the Westerhope & Denton ward. We recive more information on council affairs from the Westerhope independant councilors than we do from our own. The A69 seens to act as a barrier to our current councilors (who only appear north of it when there is an election). It would make more sense for this area to be part of the Westerhope ward where we could be trully represented Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/7019 27/01/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Newcastle upon Tyne District Personal Details: Name: Jane Armstrong E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: I feel that the addresses in Chapel House who are currently included in the Denton ward should be removed as part of this boundary change and included in the Westerhope ward. The current Denton ward is too large and difficult to administer. The residents in Chapel House are disenfranchised as the majority of the funding, initiatives and projects are aimed at the residents of West Denton particularly in social housing, and who make up the majority of the ward. The Westerhope ward includes the private housing in the remainder of Chapel House and Chapel Park and I feel that we would be better represented if we were included in this ward. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/7135 04/02/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Newcastle upon Tyne District Personal Details: Name: Carole Askew E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: I understand that there is a proposal to exclude Victoria Square from South Jesmond and I would like to object; the central motorway, which should never have gone through Jesmond in the first place , seems a little too convenient for a new boundary. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/7866 31/03/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Newcastle upon Tyne District Personal Details: Name: Beverley Bagnall E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: The Council's latest suggested ward boundary revisions affecting East Gosforth, Jesmond, Dene and Heaton Wards (area C), soon to be submitted to you, yoke together communities with little in common. The interests and identities of local communities are said to be one of your guiding principles and overriding them will make the promotion of effective local government more difficult for both electors and councillors. It is more important than achieving parity of numbers. The Ouseburn forms the strongest possible boundary, not a link between east and west, and should be seen as such. The East Gosforth social links are with the rest of Gosforth and north Jesmond and this should be reflected in the boundary changes. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/7900 14/04/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Newcastle upon Tyne District Personal Details: Name: George Bore E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: Blakelaw Ward should incorporate Cowgate so both sides of Ponteland Road are within the ward boundary. This would make sense from a community perspective. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/7326 11/02/2016 I suggest that the Option 1 for Area C would also, retain the councillors that actually care about the area, and would make more sense. Gloria Brown (Mrs) 2 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Newcastle upon Tyne District Personal Details: Name: KAREN Cardwell E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: Split up the kenton ward using geographical boundaries (which should also accommodate issues of spreading population fairly for councillors) IE 1.section to the north of kenton lane, closest to flaw don to join that ward. 2. Section to south of kenton lane, to the west of Nuns Moor, join Blakelaw ward which it is closest to geographically (as well as house prices etc) 3. Section to south of kenton lane but east of Nuns Moor to join West Gosforth which it is closest to geographically. Also some houses in this section are closer to the value of some semi-detached houses in west Gosforth and it should result in a fairer sharing of councillors per head of population. The Montagu Estate should not be joined with Blakelaw ward as the former has a greater mix of economic backgrounds and such a 'joining' would drastically reduce the value of house prices on Montagu Estate. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/7228 04/02/2016 DENE WARD BOUNDARIES ‐ OBJECTION I am appalled to hear that the boundary commission consultation period ends tomorrow and that at the last minute some boundary changes have been mooted. That there have been proposed changes is bad enough but to hear that neither the residents involved nor the area representatives for Dene Ward were not told until a couple of days ago, is unbelievable. Public consultation means just that! I attended the Dene ward meeting at the beginning of March where councillors talked about a part of Gosforth being a part of the Ward in future. I can understand that addition. I just cannot understand including Cochrane Park and excluding Benton Lodge Estate. It makes no sense at all! As the councillors have said when discussing the changes that certain areas make sense to be in the same ward, they represent distinct communities, we have been part of this ward for years. I attend every ward meeting and know and respect our 3 Liberal Democrat councillors who work hard on our behalf on local issues. I have personally delivered their newsletters in this area for over 20 years. I am horrified that the residents and local councillors were not told in time for more people to make their views known. We should not have to rely on second hand information when the proposal directly affects our immediate area. In light of this, the consultation process should be extended to give all concerned a voice, surely. After all our last ward meeting was only three weeks ago and no mention was made of this proposed change. I hope that you may reconsider the boundaries to keep the Benton Lodge Estate in the Dene Ward area. Lynda Davison (Mrs) Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Newcastle upon Tyne District Personal Details: Name: Charles Fair E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: I am in favour of reducing the number of councillors and increasing the Ward sizes - in this, the age of the internet, information technology and improved communication systems it is easier for the public to contact their local councillors. There is no need for smaller Wards. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/7129 04/02/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 2 Newcastle upon Tyne District Personal Details: Name: Stephen Fairlie E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: Submission to the Boundary Commission Re: Newcastle upon Tyne Having studied Newcastle City Council’s submission, stating their preferred options for the new warding pattern I have identified a number of problems. This boundary review has come at a difficult time as we are entering a period of population expansion and redistribution with many large housing developments due to be realised in the next few years, especially in the north and west of the city. My main concerns are with the Outer West of the city as that is where I live and represent. They involve the wards of Benwell and Scotswood, Lemington and the new proposed ward 6, “Outer West Villages”. Benwell and Scotswood (Ward 21) The proposals would see this ward with a forecast electorate of +8% above the mean by 2021. I think this is ill advised as by then, the major regeneration and housing development in Scotswood, that has only just started, will only be partially complete. It is expected that around100 new homes will be delivered annually over a period of approximately 15 years. I believe the first houses to be completed are proving popular and there is every reason to expect the scheme to proceed to schedule. Very soon after 2021 the 10% tolerance would be exceeded triggering another boundary review. The failure to future proof this ward against expected population growth is a serious flaw in the plans. Lemington (Ward 1) Lemington has the reverse problem in that it represents a tightly defined community, with its own identity, but it must enlarge to increase its electorate. It is expected that housing proposed for the Newburn Haugh site will not be delivered until the late 2020s at the earliest.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 LS Polling Stations and Constituencies.Xlsx
    Parliamentary Polling Polling Constituency Council Ward District Reference Polling Place Returning Officer Comments Central Arthur's Hill A01 A1 Stanton Street Community Lounge, Stanton Street, NE4 5LH Propose no change to polling district or polling place Central Arthur's Hill A02 A2 Moorside Primary School, Beaconsfield Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 Propose no change to polling district or polling place 5AW Central Arthur's Hill A03 A3 Spital Tongues Community Centre, Morpeth Street, NE2 4AS Propose no change to polling district or polling place Central Arthur's Hill A04 A4 Westgate Baptist Church, 366 Westgate Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 Propose no change to polling district or polling place 6NX Central Benwell and B01 B1 Broadwood Primary School Denton Burn Library, 713 West Road, Newcastle Proposed no change to polling district, however it is recommended that the Scotswood upon Tyne, NE15 7QQ use of Broadwood Primary School is discontinued due to safeguarding issues and it is proposed to use Denton Burn Library instead. This building was used to good effect for the PCC elections earlier this year. Central Benwell and B02 B2 Denton Burn Methodist Church, 615-621 West Road, NE15 7ER Propose no change to polling district or polling place Scotswood Central Benwell and B03 B3 Broadmead Way Community Church, 90 Broadmead Way, NE15 6TS Propose no change to polling district or polling place Scotswood Central Benwell and B04 B4 Sunnybank Centre, 14 Sunnybank Avenue, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE15 Propose no change to polling district or
    [Show full text]
  • Gateway West Local Amenities
    GATEWAY WEST LOCAL AMENITIES BARS Lloyd’s No1 Bar – 35-37 The Close, Quayside, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3RN Tel 0191 2111050 www.jdwetherspoon.co.uk Osbournes Bar 61 - Osbourne Road, Jesmond, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 2AN Tel 0191 2407778 www.osbournesbar.co.uk Pitcher & Piano – 108 Quayside, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3DX Tel 0191 2324110 www.pitcherandpiano.com The Keelman’s Lodge – Grange Road, Newburn, Newcastle upon Tyne NE15 8NL Tel 0191 2671689 www.keelmanslodge.co.uk The Three Mile Inn – Great North Road, Gosforth, Newcastle upon Tyne NE3 2DS Tel 0191 2552100 www.threemileinn.co.uk BUS SERVICE The 22 bus runs every 10 mins from Throckley to Wallsend timetable enclosed CASH MACHINES Co-operative Post Office - 9 Tyne View, Lemington, Newcastle upon Tyne NE15 8DE Lloyd’s Bank – Station Road, Newburn, Newcastle upon Tyne NE15 8LS Tel 0845 3000000 Sainsbury’s Supermarket - Newburn Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE15 9AF Tel 0191 2754050 CRICKET CLUBS Durham CCC – County Ground, Riverside, Chester-le-Street, Co Durham Tel 0844 4994466 www.durhamccc.co.uk Northumberland CCC – Osbourne Avenue, Jesmond, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 1JS Tel 0191 2810775 www.newcastlecc.co.uk South Northumberland CC Ltd – Roseworth Terrace, Gosforth, Newcastle upon Tyne NE3 1LU Tel 0191 2460006 www.southnort.co.uk DAY CARE AND NURSERIES Places for Children – The Waterfront, Kingfisher Boulevard, Newburn Riverside, Newcastle upon Tyne NE15 8NZ Tel 0191 2645030 www.placesforchildren.co.uk The Lemington Centre – Tyne View, Lemington, Newcastle upon Tyne NE15 8DE Tel 0191 2641959
    [Show full text]
  • Throckley Leazes Tenants and Residents Group
    Throckley Leazes Tenants and Residents Group Established January 1998 Chairman Jennie Stokell Vice Chairman Secretary Carol Eddy Treasurer Sheila Grey Monday 22 August 2016 David Owen, Review Officer, (Newcastle upon Tyne) Local Government Boundary Commission for England, 14th Floor, Millbank Tower, Millbank, London, SW1P 4QP. Dear Sir or Madam, Ref : City of Newcastle upon Tyne - Draft Recommendations on New Electoral Arrangements - Callerton Throckley I have been asked by our Ward Counsellors to thank you for putting Walbottle back into this electoral ward. My Group are still not happy about this new ward created by apparently adding odd bits of the outer City to Newburn, Throckley, etc, to create a “patchwork” ward with little cohesion along its length once away from the riverside settlements. Our objections are as follows 1. Consultation. My Group are disappointed that the City Council have again failed to publise this consultation about the proposed changes to the ward boundaries and the implications to the people living in the areas. We have found when raising the issue at our meetings and in private conversations, that there is more interest than we would have expected once the whole project relating to the proposed changes around Throckley and Newburn are explained. This interest is across the age ranges of residents, not simply among the elderly who have memories of the Newburn Urban District Council and its governance of the area prior to Newburn, etc. inclusion in the City of Newcastle upon Tyne. Local people are possessive of the long term history of their area and the events which make up their social and cultural heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Notes and Local Details for 1:Loooo Sheets NZ26NW, NE, SW and SE Newcastle Upon Tyne and Gateshead
    Natural Environment Research Council INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES Geological Survey of England and Wales Geological notes and local details for 1:lOOOO sheets NZ26NW, NE, SW and SE Newcastle upon Tyne and Gateshead Part of 1:50000 sheets 14 (Morpeth), 15 (Tynemouth), 20 (Newcastle upon Tyne) and 21 (Sunderland) G. Richardson with contributions by D. A. C. Mills Bibliogrcphic reference Richardson, G. 1983. Geological notes and local details for 1 : 10000 sheets NZ26NW, NE, SW and SE (Newcastle upon Tyne and Gateshead) (Keyworth: Institute of Geological Sciences .) Author G. Richardson Institute of Geological Sciences W indsorTerrace, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HE Production of this report was supported by theDepartment ofthe Environment The views expressed in this reportare not necessarily those of theDepartment of theEnvironment - 0 Crown copyright 1983 KEYWORTHINSTITUTE OF GEOLOGICALSCIENCES 1983 PREFACE "his account describes the geology of l:25 000 sheet NZ 26 which spans the adjoining corners of l:5O 000 geological sheets 14 (Morpeth), 15 (Tynemouth), 20 (Newcastle upon Tyne) and sheet 22 (Sunderland). The area was first surveyed at a scale of six inches to one mile by H H Howell and W To~ley. Themaps were published in the old 'county' series during the years 1867 to 1871. During the first quarter of this century parts of the area were revised but no maps were published. In the early nineteen twenties part of the southern area was revised by rcJ Anderson and published in 1927 on the six-inch 'County' edition of Durham 6 NE. In the mid nineteen thirties G Burnett revised a small part of the north of the area and this revision was published in 1953 on Northumberland New 'County' six-inch maps 85 SW and 85 SE.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridges Over the Tyne Session Plan
    Bridges over the Tyne Session Plan There are seven bridges over the Tyne between central Newcastle and Gateshead but there have been a number of bridges in the past that do not exist anymore. However the oldest current bridge, still standing and crossing the Tyne is actually at Corbridge, built in 1674. Pon Aelius is the earliest known bridge. It dates from the Roman times and was built in the reign of the Roman Emperor Hadrian at the same time as Hadrian’s Wall around AD122. It was located where the Swing Bridge is now and would have been made of wood possibly with stone piers. It last- ed until the Roman withdrawal from Britain in the 5th century. Two altars can be seen in the Great North Museum to Neptune and Oceanus. They are thought to have been placed next to the bridge at the point where the river under the protection of Neptune met the tidal waters of the sea under the protection of Oceanus. The next known bridge was the Medieval Bridge. Built in the late 12th century, it was a stone arched bridge with huge piers. The bridge had shops, houses, a chapel and a prison on it. It had towers with gates a drawbridge and portcullis reflecting its military importance. The bridge collapsed during the great flood of 1771, after three days of heavy rain, with a loss of six lives. You can still see the remains of the bridge in the stone archways on both the Newcastle and Gateshead sides of the river where The Swing Bridge is today.
    [Show full text]
  • Constituency Ward District Reference Polling Place Returning Officer Comments
    Constituency Ward District Reference Polling Place Returning Officer Comments Central Arthurs Hill A01 A1 Stanton Street Community Lounge, Stanton Street, NE4 5LH Propose no change to polling district or polling place Moorside Primary School, Beaconsfield Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 Central Arthurs Hill A02 A2 Propose no change to polling district or polling place 5AW Central Arthurs Hill A03 A3 Spital Tongues Community Centre, Morpeth Street, NE2 4AS Propose no change to polling district or polling place Westgate Baptist Church, 366 Westgate Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 Central Arthurs Hill A04 A4 Propose no change to polling district or polling place 6NX Proposed no change to polling district, however it is recommended that the Benwell and Broadwood Primary School Denton Burn Library, 713 West Road, Newcastle use of Broadwood Primary School is discontinued due to safeguarding Central B01 B1 Scotswood upon Tyne, NE15 7QQ issues and it is proposed to use Denton Burn Library instead. This building was used to good effect for the PCC elections earlier this year. Benwell and Central B02 B2 Denton Burn Methodist Church, 615-621 West Road, NE15 7ER Propose no change to polling district or polling place Scotswood Benwell and Central B03 B3 Broadmead Way Community Church, 90 Broadmead Way, NE15 6TS Propose no change to polling district or polling place Scotswood Benwell and Central B04 B4 Sunnybank Centre, 14 Sunnybank Avenue, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE15 6SD Propose no change to polling district or polling place Scotswood Benwell and Atkinson
    [Show full text]
  • Know Your Councillors 2019 — 2020
    Know Your Councillors 2019 — 2020 Arthur’s Hill Benwell & Scotswood Blakelaw Byker Callerton & Throckley Castle Chapel Dene & South Gosforth Denton & Westerhope Ali Avaei Lord Beecham DCL DL Oskar Avery George Allison Ian Donaldson Sandra Davison Henry Gallagher Nick Forbes C/o Members Services Simon Barnes 39 The Drive C/o Members Services 113 Allendale Road Clovelly, Walbottle Road 11 Kelso Close 868 Shields Road c/o Leaders Office Newcastle upon Tyne C/o Members Services Newcastle upon Tyne Newcastle upon Tyne Newcastle upon Tyne Walbottle Chapel Park Newcastle upon Tyne Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8QH Newcastle upon Tyne NE3 4AJ NE1 8QH NE6 2SY Newcastle upon Tyne Newcastle upon Tyne NE6 4QP NE1 8QH 0191 274 0627 NE1 8QH 0191 285 1888 07554 431 867 0191 265 8995 NE15 8HY NE5 1TR 0191 276 0819 0191 211 5151 07765 256 319 07535 291 334 07768 868 530 Labour Labour 07702 387 259 07946 236 314 07947 655 396 Labour Liberal Democrat Labour Labour Newcastle First Independent Liberal Democrat [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Marc Donnelly Veronica Dunn Melissa Davis Joanne Kingsland Rob Higgins Nora Casey Stephen Fairlie Aidan King 17 Ladybank Karen Robinson 18 Merchants Wharf 78a Wheatfield Road 34 Valley View 11 Highwood Road C/o Members Services 24 Hawthorn Street 15 Hazelwood Road Newcastle upon Tyne 441
    [Show full text]
  • Newcastle Conservative Federation
    Newcastle Conservative Federation Newcastle City Council Electoral Review – Draft Boundaries Submission August 2016 This is a response from the Newcastle Conservative Federation to the Local Government Boundary Commission’s draft proposals for electoral ward boundaries within Newcastle upon Tyne. It draws on the views expressed to us by our members and local residents. We have chosen not to submit a full alternative response to the Commission’s proposals but would like to offer some thoughts on some specific ward proposals where we have received feedback from our members or residents. Newcastle Conservatives responded to the original consultation on warding arrangements by expressing its view that the number of councillors should reduce from the current level of seventy-eight. Our original proposal was to reduce the number of councillors to fifty-two representing fifty-two single member wards. However we acknowledged that were the Council and the Commission to continue to divide the number of councillors by three then the reduction should be to fifty-four councillors with three members each representing one of eighteen wards. We set out our reasons for this in detail which we have attached as an appendix to this submission. The strong arguments in favour of a reduction appeared initially to have been accepted by the Commission, however the Commission then changed its mind after protests from the City Council. We remain disappointed that the Commission chose to cave in to pressure from Labour councillors and declined to take this opportunity to reduce the cost of politics in Newcastle and provide the City with an adequate level of representation.
    [Show full text]
  • Walbottle Conservation Character
    CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 Terms of reference: conservation areas evaluation 2 1.2 Walbottle Village – purpose of designation, principles of character and boundaries, the sub-division of the conservation area 3 2. CONTEXT OF WALBOTTLE VILLAGE 6 2.1 Historical development 6 2.2 Recent changes – Present situation 7 2.3 Landscape context 9 3. CHARACTER APPRAISAL 13 3.1 Sub-area A: The Green 13 3.2 Sub-area B: Dene Terrace 25 3.3 Sub-area C: The Waggonway 28 3.4 Sub-area D: The Bungalows 30 3.5 Walbottle Hall 33 4. MANAGEMENT PLAN 34 4.1 Introduction 34 4.2 Existing designations within the Conservation Area 34 4.3 Future Management 37 4.4 Design Guide by sub-area 45 APPENDIX 1 47 Planning context of the Management Plan APPENDIX 2 49 Legislative framework of the Management Plan: Planning Procedures Acknowledgements 52 Walbottle Village Conservation Area Character Statement & Management Plan 1 1. INTRODUCTION be the basis for local plan policies and development control decisions, as well as for the preservation and enhancement 1.1 Terms of Reference of the character or appearance of an This character appraisal has been area”. prepared in response to Government advice. Value of the Appraisal The value of the appraisal is two-fold. Conservation Areas First, its publication will improve the Conservation Areas were introduced by understanding of the value of the built the Civic Amenities Act 1967, and heritage. It will provide property owners defined as being “areas of special within the conservation area, and architectural or historic interest the potential developers with clearer character or appearance of which it is guidance on planning matters and the desirable to preserve or enhance”.
    [Show full text]
  • 24, Hepple Way, Gosforth, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Ne3
    24, HEPPLE WAY, GOSFORTH, NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE, NE3 £750 per month, Unfurnished + £250 inc VAT tenancy paperwork and inventory fee other charges apply*. Convenient Location • 3 Reception Rooms • 4 Bedrooms • Garden • Parking EPC Rating = D Council Tax = E A detached property situated in its own private grounds with mature gardens. Entrance Vestibule – 2.9m x 1.9m Spacious entrance vestibule with coat hooks, radiator and coving to the ceiling. Cloakroom – 1.3m x 1.3m Low level WC, wall mounted wash hand basin with tiled splashback, radiator, vinyl flooring, window to the front. Study – 4.3m x 3.9m Spacious reception room with window to the side of the property, storage cupboard shelving to one wall, radiator, telephone point, and wall mounted gas fire, coving to ceiling. Inner Reception Hall – 3.01m x 2.5m With telephone point, radiator, understairs cupboard, thermostat, coving to ceiling. Sitting Room – 5.4m x 4.5m Light and airy reception room with gas fire, marble inset and timber surround. French doors into the garden, TV aerial point, window to the side, coving to ceiling. Kitchen – 3.8m x 3.3m With a range of wall & floor units with roll top work surface, space for electric cooker, extractor fan, tiled splash back, 1½ stainless steel sink with drainer and mixer tap over, plumbing for dishwasher, window to side, radiator, vinyl flooring. Utility Room – 1.9m x 3.3m With floor unit, stainless steel sink with drainer, plumbing for washing machine, window to the side, doors to into garage, radiator. Dining Room – 4.6m x 3.9m Spacious reception room with dual aspect windows to the front and side, double radiators, coving to ceiling, stripped wood flooring.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Resident's Submissions to the Newcastle-Upon-Tyne Council Electoral Review
    Local resident’s submissions to the Newcastle-upon-Tyne Council electoral review This PDF document contains submissions from local residents. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Pr9hvq A ) Tr) Mishka Mayers Review Assistant LGBCE 0330 500 1251 From: Karon Alderman Sent: 18 August 2016 11:37 To: reviews <[email protected]> Subject: Newcastle ward boundary changes Dear Boundary Commission I believe that the Benton Lodge Estate, where I live, is very much part of the Dene community and should stay part of Dene Ward. Please reverse the decision on the Dene adn Manor Park ward boundariues decision and choose Newcastle Council’s Option 1 for area C as this is more in line with our communities and services. Thank you, Karon Alderman 1 ‐‐ Jonathan Ashby Review Assistant LGBCE From: Sent: 19 August 2016 13:07 To: reviews <[email protected]> Subject: Draft recommendations for Newcastle City Council Good Morning, I have attached an extract from your document concerning the above issue which is a little confusing - apologies if you are already aware of this.. As I reside in North Walbottle I have always thought that we have little in common with the existing Newburn ward and fully support the creation of a new Chapel ward and North Walbottle's inclusion within it. However, on reading the document, there is an apparent contradiction (which I assume is a simple slip of the pen/keyboard) - I have highlighted the error in yellow, and which should read simply Walbottle and not North Walbottle? Thank you.
    [Show full text]
  • Notices and Proceedings 25 July 2014
    OFFICE OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSIONER (NORTH EAST OF ENGLAND) NOTICES AND PROCEEDINGS PUBLICATION NUMBER: 2180 PUBLICATION DATE: 25 July 2014 OBJECTION DEADLINE DATE: 15 August 2014 Correspondence should be addressed to: Office of the Traffic Commissioner (North East of England) Hillcrest House 386 Harehills Lane Leeds LS9 6NF Telephone: 0300 123 9000 Fax: 0113 249 8142 Website: www.gov.uk The public counter at the above office is open from 9.30am to 4pm Monday to Friday The next edition of Notices and Proceedings will be published on: 08/08/2014 Publication Price £3.50 (post free) This publication can be viewed by visiting our website at the above address. It is also available, free of charge, via e-mail. To use this service please send an e-mail with your details to: [email protected] Remember to keep your bus registrations up to date - check yours on https://www.gov.uk/manage-commercial-vehicle-operator-licence-online NOTICES AND PROCEEDINGS General Notes Layout and presentation – Entries in each section (other than in section 5) are listed in alphabetical order. Each entry is prefaced by a reference number, which should be quoted in all correspondence or enquiries. Further notes precede sections where appropriate. Accuracy of publication – Details published of applications and requests reflect information provided by applicants. The Traffic Commissioner cannot be held responsible for applications that contain incorrect information. Our website includes details of all applications listed in this booklet. The website address is: www.gov.uk Copies of Notices and Proceedings can be inspected free of charge at the Office of the Traffic Commissioner in Leeds.
    [Show full text]