DOCSLIB.ORG

Lgbt Travel Advisories

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lgbt Travel Advisories HRC Global LGBT TRAVEL ADVISORIES A compilation of U.S. Department of State “travel advisories” for American LGBT travelers, supplemented with advisories made by the Australian, Canadian, Irish and United Kingdom governments for the purpose of comparison. These governments were selected because they provide English-language, LGBT-specific travel advisories. Reviewing these advisories should only be a first step when researching a potential travel destination. This resource was most recently updated on April 8, 2015. Contents LGBT Travel Information – Adapted from guidance by the U.S. Department of State................................. 8 EUROPE ....................................................................................................................................................... 12 Albania ........................................................................................................................................................ 12 Andorra ....................................................................................................................................................... 12 Armenia ....................................................................................................................................................... 13 Austria ......................................................................................................................................................... 13 Azerbaijan ................................................................................................................................................... 14 Belarus ........................................................................................................................................................ 14 Belgium ....................................................................................................................................................... 15 Bosnia and Herzegovina .............................................................................................................................. 15 Bulgaria ....................................................................................................................................................... 16 Croatia ......................................................................................................................................................... 16 Cyprus ......................................................................................................................................................... 17 Czech Republic ............................................................................................................................................ 17 Denmark ...................................................................................................................................................... 18 Estonia ......................................................................................................................................................... 18 Finland ......................................................................................................................................................... 19 France.......................................................................................................................................................... 19 Georgia ........................................................................................................................................................ 19 Germany ...................................................................................................................................................... 20 Greece ......................................................................................................................................................... 21 Hungary ....................................................................................................................................................... 21 Iceland ......................................................................................................................................................... 21 Ireland ......................................................................................................................................................... 22 Italy ............................................................................................................................................................. 22 Kosovo ......................................................................................................................................................... 22 Latvia ........................................................................................................................................................... 23 Liechtenstein ............................................................................................................................................... 24 Lithuania ..................................................................................................................................................... 24 1 Luxembourg ................................................................................................................................................ 24 Macedonia .................................................................................................................................................. 25 Malta ........................................................................................................................................................... 25 Moldova ...................................................................................................................................................... 25 Monaco ....................................................................................................................................................... 26 Montenegro ................................................................................................................................................ 26 Netherlands................................................................................................................................................. 27 Norway ........................................................................................................................................................ 27 Poland ......................................................................................................................................................... 27 Portugal ....................................................................................................................................................... 28 Romania ...................................................................................................................................................... 28 Russia .......................................................................................................................................................... 28 San Marino .................................................................................................................................................. 29 Serbia .......................................................................................................................................................... 30 Slovakia ....................................................................................................................................................... 30 Slovenia ....................................................................................................................................................... 31 Spain ............................................................................................................................................................ 31 Sweden ........................................................................................................................................................ 32 Switzerland .................................................................................................................................................. 32 Turkey ......................................................................................................................................................... 32 Ukraine ........................................................................................................................................................ 33 United Kingdom .......................................................................................................................................... 34 Vatican City (Holy See) ................................................................................................................................ 34 AFRICA ......................................................................................................................................................... 35 Algeria ......................................................................................................................................................... 35 Angola ......................................................................................................................................................... 35 Benin ..........................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Homeland, Identity and Wellbeing Amongst the Beni-Amer in Eritrea-Sudan and Diasporas
    IM/MOBILITY: HOMELAND, IDENTITY AND WELLBEING AMONGST THE BENI-AMER IN ERITREA-SUDAN AND DIASPORAS Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester Saeid Hmmed BSc MSc (OU) Department of Geography University of Leicester September 2017 i Abstract This thesis focuses on how mobility, identity, conceptions of homeland and wellbeing have been transformed across time and space amongst the Beni-Amer. Beni-Amer pastoralist societies inhabit western Eritrea and eastern Sudan; their livelihoods are intimately connected to livestock. Their cultural identities, norms and values, and their indigenous knowledge, have revolved around pastoralism. Since the 1950s the Beni-Amer have undergone rapid and profound socio-political and geographic change. In the 1950s the tribe left most of their ancestral homeland and migrated to Sudan; many now live in diasporas in Western and Middle Eastern countries. Their mobility, and conceptions of homeland, identity and wellbeing are complex, mutually constitutive and cannot be easily untangled. The presence or absence, alteration or limitation of one of these concepts affects the others. Qualitatively designed and thematically analysed, this study focuses on the multiple temporalities and spatialities of Beni-Amer societies. The study subjected pastoral mobility to scrutiny beyond its contemporary theoretical and conceptual framework. It argues that pastoral mobility is currently understood primarily via its role as a survival system; as a strategy to exploit transient concentration of pasture and water across rangelands. The study stresses that such perspectives have contributed to the conceptualization of pastoral mobility as merely physical movement, a binary contrast to settlement; pastoral societies are therefore seen as either sedentary or mobile.
    [Show full text]
  • OSU Risk Assessment Worksheet for Countries with a Travel Advisory 3
    OSU Risk Assessment Worksheet for Travel Warning Countries http://travel.state.gov/travel/ OSU Policy for International Travel, 1-0132 6.01, restricts travel to countries posted on the U.S. Department of State travel warning list. Exception requests will be subject to review by the Risk Assessment Committee’s recommendation to the Director of Risk Management. Name & Department Signature of traveller Travel Warning Countries & Cities to be visited Date Date of Departure/Return Purpose of Visit Have you travelled to this Yes - No (If yes, describe briefly previous trip and approximate dates) country before? Please specify if you have extensive Yes - No (if yes, describe) knowledge of the country you are visiting (gained from residence, citizenship or work experience there) Are students involved in this travel? Yes – No (if yes, list names of students and contact information) Are others involved in this travel? Yes – No ( if yes, list names and contact information) (colleagues, family members) Travel Warning Data for countries on your itinerary? Please copy and paste the travel warning notice from the U.S. Department of State webpage for the country being visited: Go to http://travel.state.gov/ Click on Travel Warnings Select the country you are visiting Copy and paste warning Select the specific risks below which were identified for the travel warning countries you intend to visit. Identify for each whether the probability of occurrence is Low, Medium, High, or extreme and list the measures you have taken to reduce each risk identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Security:Theoretical and Practical Discussions
    Durham E-Theses Changing Security:Theoretical and Practical Discussions. The Case of Lebanon. SMAIRA, DIMA How to cite: SMAIRA, DIMA (2014) Changing Security:Theoretical and Practical Discussions. The Case of Lebanon. , Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/10810/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Changing Security: Theoretical and Practical Discussions. The Case of Lebanon. Dima Smaira Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in International Relations. School of Government and International Affairs Durham University 2014 i Abstract This study is concerned with security; particularly security in Lebanon. It is also equally concerned with various means to improve security. Building on debates at the heart of world politics and Security Studies, this study first discusses trends in global governance, in the study of security, and in security assistance to post-conflict or developing countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceptions of Personal Risk in Tourists' Destination Choices
    EJTHR 2017; 8(1):38-50 Research Article Gregory E. Osland*, Robert Mackoy, Marleen McCormick Perceptions of personal risk in tourists’ destination choices: nature tours in Mexico https://doi.org/10.1515/ejthr-2017-0002 events have recently heightened the sense of personal received 10 August, 2016; accepted 10 January, 2017 risk, particularly regarding tourism destinations in certain regions and nations. The perception of risk varies across Abstract: Terrorism, pandemic diseases, and other threat- tourists and is a major component of the decision-mak- ening events have recently heightened the sense of per- ing process for evaluating destinations (Sönmez & sonal risk for tourists considering international travel. Graefe, 1998). This article addresses the paucity of research assessing Although recent researchers (e.g., Hajibaba, Gretzel, perceptions of risk both before and during travel to risky Leisch, & Dolnicar, 2015) have identified several catego- destinations. Tourists on two nature tours in Mexico were ries of travel risk, more research is needed on specific interviewed and observed while engaged in the travel. travel risks that are perceived by tourists. Little research Many types of specific perceived risks were uncovered, has been found on the cognitive and affective factors asso- including insect-borne disease, traffic accidents, finan- ciated with perceptions of risk in destination choices. In cial losses, and unattained goals. Some correlates of per- addition, participant observer field research is needed ceived risk were tour company reputation, stage of family that observes and analyzes tourists while travelling in life cycle, age, and motivation. Based on the types of per- risky locations (Hajibaba et al., 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • The Global State of Lgbtiq Organizing
    THE GLOBAL STATE OF LGBTIQ ORGANIZING THE RIGHT TO REGISTER Written by Felicity Daly DrPH Every day around the world, LGBTIQ people’s human rights and dignity are abused in ways that shock the conscience. The stories of their struggles and their resilience are astounding, yet remain unknown—or willfully ignored—by those with the power to make change. OutRight Action International, founded in 1990 as the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission, works alongside LGBTIQ people in the Global South, with offices in six countries, to help identify community-focused solutions to promote policy for lasting change. We vigilantly monitor and document human rights abuses to spur action when they occur. We train partners to expose abuses and advocate for themselves. Headquartered in New York City, OutRight is the only global LGBTIQ-specific organization with a permanent presence at the United Nations in New York that advocates for human rights progress for LGBTIQ people. [email protected] https://www.facebook.com/outrightintl http://twitter.com/outrightintl http://www.youtube.com/lgbthumanrights http://OutRightInternational.org/iran OutRight Action International 80 Maiden Lane, Suite 1505, New York, NY 10038 U.S.A. P: +1 (212) 430.6054 • F: +1 (212) 430.6060 This work may be reproduced and redistributed, in whole or in part, without alteration and without prior written permission, solely for nonprofit administrative or educational purposes provided all copies contain the following statement: © 2018 OutRight Action International. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of OutRight Action International. No other use is permitted without the express prior written permission of OutRight Action International.
    [Show full text]
  • If You Have Booked a Package Tour (Ie a Combination of at Least Two Travel
    5.3.2020 INFORMATION ON THE PACKAGE TRAVEL DIRECTIVE IN CONNECTION WITH THE COVID-19 If you have booked a package tour (i.e. a combination of at least two travel services, e.g. transport and accommodation) and you have not yet left for your trip, consult the travel advice of your national authorities and contact your tour operator or travel agency. Travel advice is a national competence. Check if your national authority, e.g. the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, issued an official travel warning for the region to which you plan to travel. Travel advice is being updated as the situation changes. The list of EU Member States’ travel advice is available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/travel-advice-list.pdf According to the Directive on Package Travel and Linked Travel Arrangements, both the traveller and the tour operator can cancel the trip without penalty in case of “unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances occurring at the place of destination or its immediate vicinity and significantly affecting the performance of the package, or which significantly affect the carriage of passengers to the destination” (Article 12(2) of the Package Travel Directive). ‘Unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances’ means a situation beyond the control of the party who invokes such a situation and the consequences of which could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken. Significant risks to human health, such as the outbreak of a serious disease like the COVID-19 at the travel destination or its immediate vicinity usually qualify as such unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fate of Tourism During and in the Aftermath
    rism & Kebede, J Tourism Hospit 2018, 7:1 ou H f T o o s l p DOI: 10.4172/2167-0269.1000337 a i t n a r l i u t y o J Journal of Tourism & Hospitality ISSN: 2167-0269 CaseResearch Study Article OpenOpen Access Access The Fate of Tourism during and in the Aftermath of Political Instability: Ethiopia Tourism in Focus Nafbek Solomon Kebede* Department of Management, Faculty of Business and Economics, Kotebe Metropolitan University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Abstract The vulnerability of tourism to variety of crises may result in the decline of tourist flow and receipt as well as in deforming the image of a destination. This particular snapshot case review has discussed the appearance of tourism during the political instability and its outcome, state of emergency. Web-sites, journals, books, mass media, personal observation and limited interview were used to gather information about the effect of political instability on tourism industry. Several tourist originating countries have issued travel advisories - some unbalance with the actual gravity of crisis- to Ethiopia putting the country in general at ‘High risk’ crisis level. Overall, the country has been suffering from the political instability. As a result, composite crisis management strategies have to be effectively developed for the sustainable and resilient tourism development. Keywords: Political instability; State of emergency; Ethiopia; Travel “Perceptions of political instability and safety are a prerequisite advisories; Recovery strategies for tourist visitation. Violent protests, social unrest, civil war, terrorist actions, the perceived violations of human rights, or even the mere Introduction threat of these activities can all serve to cause tourists to alter their Titanic ally, tourism is growing as one of the export commodities travel behavior”.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions
    Frequently Asked Questions #1: If it’s safe to visit Mexico, why has the U.S. Department of State issued a Travel Warning for Mexico? While it is true that as a result of incidents of violence in parts of some border states, the U.S. Department of State is advising against non-essential travel to these specific areas of the border. This travel warning also explicitly mentions that millions of U.S. citizens safely visit Mexico each year, including tens of thousands who cross the land border daily for study, tourism or business and nearly one million U.S. citizens who live in Mexico. It also states that the country’s tourist destinations remain safe places to visit. Mexico has been for many years and remains the number one international tourism destination for Americans. View the latest warning updated on September 10, 2010, at the Department of State website http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/tw/tw_4755.html #2: Are people continuing to travel to Mexico even though the Travel Warning exists and that some state organizations and the media are advising against travel to the destination? Absolutely! In 2010, 22.4 million tourist arrivals were recorded to Mexico, an increase of 4.4% over the 2009 arrivals of 21.5 million. In January of 2011, 1,965,000 tourists arrived in Mexico surpassing the last 3 years, including January of 2008 which was a banner year for arrivals to the destination. #3: Why should I choose a Mexico vacation now when there are so many great vacation destinations? VALUE – The value and price of a Mexico vacation is unbeatable.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of Security Passport and Visa Program
    Office of Security Passport and Visa Program Lead Story Headline Important Links MEXICO TRAVEL WARNING U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Consu- https://travel.state.gov/content/passports/en/alertswarnings/mexico-travel-warning.html lar Affairs — https://travel.state.gov/ content/travel/en.html The U.S. Department of State warns U.S. citizens about the risk of traveling to certain parts of Mexico due to U.S. Passports & International Travel, Alerts the activities of criminal organizations in those areas. U.S. citizens have been the victims of violent crimes, and Warnings — https://travel.state.gov/ content/passports/en/alertswarnings.html including homicide, kidnapping, carjacking, and robbery in various Mexican states. This Travel Warning re- places the Travel Warning for Mexico issued December 8, 2016. U.S. Visas — https://travel.state.gov/ content/visas/en.html For information on security conditions in specific regions of Mexico, see our state-by-state assessments Washington Passport Agency - https:// below. U.S. government personnel and their families are prohibited from personal travel to all areas to travel.state.gov/content/passports/en/ which the Department recommends “defer non-essential travel” in this Travel Warning. As a result of securi- passports/information/where-to-apply/ ty precautions that U.S. government personnel must take while traveling to parts of Mexico, our response agencies/washington.html time to emergencies involving U.S. citizens may be hampered or delayed. Smart Traveler Enrollment Program - https://step.state.gov/step/ Gun battles between rival criminal organizations or with Mexican authorities have taken place on streets and in public places during broad daylight.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions and Answers Regarding Covid-19 and Cancellations
    Frequently asked questions and answers regarding Covid-19 and cancellations 1) Is the hotel allowed to charge cancellation fees in case of a governmental closure/lockdown? No. 2) Is the hotel allowed to charge cancellation fees if the entire hotel or village is quarantined? No. 3) In which situations is it ok to charge cancellation fees from the guests? - As long as the hotel is open and reachable - As long as the guest is allowed to travel but wants to cancel because of fear of increasing infection numbers 4) What about travel warnings? Do they justify a cancellation free of charge? In case of direct & individual bookings, a travel warning for the destination country is no argument for a free cancellation itself. If a quarantine upon return is mandatory, this could be evaluated as unreasonable and it needs to be discussed if the hotel charges fees. There are no legal judgments about this yet. (In case of package booking via tour operators the guest is allowed to cancel free of charge as a travel warning occurs.) 5) Which reasons are covered by the Europäischen Reiseversicherung referring to Covid- 19? - because you suffer from COVID-19 symptoms, - because you have been found to have an elevated temperature measured, even if a later test result is negative, - because you were tested positive for COVID-19 without showing symptoms, - because a close relative or a person living in the same household has contracted COVID-19 and your urgent presence is required, - because a close relative in the same household has contracted COVID-19 and you must therefore be quarantined, - because you are unable to travel as a result of your illness during your stay.
    [Show full text]
  • Eritrea 2012 Human Rights Report
    ERITREA 2012 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The government of the State of Eritrea is a highly centralized, authoritarian regime under the control of President Isaias Afwerki. The People’s Front for Democracy and Justice (PFDJ), headed by President Isaias, is the sole political party. There have been no elections since the country’s independence from Ethiopia in 1993. Elements of the security forces sometimes acted independently of civilian control. Unlawful killings by security forces continued, as did torture, harsh prison conditions, and incommunicado detention, which sometimes resulted in death. The government continued to force persons to participate in its national service program, often for periods of indefinite duration. The government also severely restricted civil liberties, including freedom of speech, press, assembly, association, and religion. Other abuses included: politically motivated disappearances; arbitrary arrest and detention, including of national service evaders; executive interference in the judiciary; detention of political prisoners and detainees; lack of due process and excessive pretrial detention; infringement of privacy rights; restrictions on academic freedom and cultural events; and limits on freedom of movement and travel. Abuse and discrimination against women and the Kunama ethnic group were a concern. The law criminalizes consensual same-sex activity. Child abuse, female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C), human trafficking, and forced child labor occurred. Government policies limited worker rights. The government did not prosecute or punish officials who committed abuses, whether in the security services or elsewhere in the government. Impunity was the norm. Section 1. Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom from: a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life The government committed arbitrary killings and subjected detainees to harsh and life-threatening prison conditions, including torture, which resulted in deaths.
    [Show full text]
  • Costa Rica and Kenya As Ecotourism Destinations
    COSTA RICA AND KENYA AS ECOTOURISM DESTINATIONS Country Strategies vs. Visitor Perceptions Master´s Thesis in International Business Author: Miranna Talvinen Supervisors: D.Sc. Elina Pelto M.Sc. Katja Einola 17.4.2017 Turku Turun kauppakorkeakoulu • Turku School of Economics Table of contents 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Tourism industry ............................................................................................ 7 1.2 Focus of the research ...................................................................................... 8 1.3 Objective and structure of the study ............................................................... 9 2 ECOTOURISM ..................................................................................................... 11 2.1 From tourism to ecotourism ......................................................................... 11 2.2 Brief timeline of ecotourism ........................................................................ 12 2.3 Ecotourism explained ................................................................................... 14 2.4 Ecotourists .................................................................................................... 16 2.5 Implications to social, natural and economic environments ........................ 18 2.6 Marketing of ecotourism .............................................................................. 20 2.7 Visitors’ satisfaction, expectations, and
    [Show full text]