DOCSLIB.ORG

Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology The Human Skeleton ANTH 1720/ARCH 1772 Professor Andrew Scherer BioMed 015 6:40 – 8:00 TuThu Email: [email protected] Office Phone: (401) 863-7059 Office Hours: Wednesday, 1:00 – 3:00; Giddings 215 Teachings Assistants: COURSE DESCRIPTION and OBJECTIVES: More than just a rigid structure beneath our skin, the human skeleton is a living, dynamic tissue that is an integral element of our bio-cultural lives. As with all vertebrates, our skeleton gives our bodies form and protection, while contributing to a number of key physiological processes. However, the human skeleton is in many respects unique—a bi-product of a 6 million year evolutionary trajectory that has left us the sole big- brained, bipedal primate on the planet, and with one of the longest lifespans and slowest development of any mammal. To the trained analyst, the human skeleton is a history book from which one can not only read our evolutionary story but also the biography of individual past lives. In that regards, knowledge of the human skeleton provides the structural framework for much of the discipline of biological anthropology, and is an essential area of study in a variety of fields, including archaeology, forensic science, and medicine. We will explore the human skeleton through both lecture and intensive hands-on laboratory work. For each skeletal element, we will examine issues of structure, function, development, and evolutionary history. By the end of the semester you will be able to identify every bone in your (or someone else’s) body, recognize key anatomical landmarks on those bones, and determine the side of the body to which a particular bone belongs. Beyond skeletal anatomy, we will also explore aspects of bone histology and biology, excavation and preservation, taphonomy, and pathology. We will consider how sexually dimorphic aspects of our skeleton— particularly our unusual pelvic design—permits us to distinguish between male and female skeletons. We will explore how the prolonged development and degeneration of the human skeleton allows us to glean information from age-at-death from our bones. We will also explore the interface of the human skeleton with society (past and present) through the fields of forensic anthropology and bioarchaeology. And we will discuss ethical issues in the study of human remains. By the end of the course, you will be able to conduct basic skeletal analysis and will be prepared for more advanced studies of the human skeleton from medical, forensic, archaeological, functional, and evolutionary perspectives. REQUIRED TEXTS: White, T.D., M.T. Black, and P. Folkens 2011 Human Osteology. Third edition. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, MA. ADDITIONAL READINGS: We will also be reading a variety of articles on topics pertaining to the study of the human skeleton: Ackerman, Jennifer. 2006 The Downside of Upright. National Geographic July: 126-145. DiGangi, Elizabeth A. and Joseph T. Hefner 2013 Ancestry Estimation. In Research Methods in Human Skeletal Biology, edited by E.A. DiGangi and M.K. Moore, pp. 117-150. Academic Press, Oxford. DiGangi, Elizabeth A. and Megan K. Moore 2013 Introduction to Skeletal Biology. In Research Methods in Human Skeletal Biology, edited by E.A. DiGangi and M.K. Moore, pp. 3-28. Academic Press, Oxford Komar, Deborah and Jane Buikstra 2008 Chapters 1 and 2: Forensic Anthropology: Contemporary Theory and Practice Larsen, Clark Spencer 2006 The Changing Face of Bioarchaeology: An Interdisciplinary Science. In Bioarchaeology: The Contextual Analysis of Human Remains, edited by J.E. Buikstra and L.A. Beck, pp. 359-374. Academic Press, Burlington, MA. Lieberman, Daniel 2011 A Tinkered Ape? Excerpt from: The Evolution of the Human Head. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Martin, Deborah.L., Ryan P. Harrod, Ventura R. Pérez 2013 The Practice of Bioarchaeology. Bioarchaeology: An Integrated Approach to Working with Human Remains, Springer, New York. Ostendorf Smith 2013 Paleopathology. In Research Methods in Human Skeletal Biology, edited by E.A. DiGangi and M.K. Moore, pp. 181-218. Academic Press, Oxford. Roberts, C., Manchester, K., 2005. Chapters 1 and 7: The Archaeology of Disease, Third ed., Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. Sledzik, Paul S., Dennis Dirkmaat, Robert W. Mann, Thomas D. Holland, Amy Zelson Mundorff, Bradley J. Adams, Christian Crowder and Frank DePaolo 2009 Disaster Victim Recovery and Identification: Forensic Anthropology in the Aftermath of September 11. In Hard Evidence: Case Studies in Forensic Anthropology, edited by D. W. Steadman. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. Smith, O.C., Elayne J. Pope and Steven A. Symes 2009 Look Until You See: Identification of Trauma in Skeletal Material. In Hard Evidence: Case Studies in Forensic Anthropology, edited by D. W. Steadman, pp. 190-204. Second ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. Walker, Phillip L. and Della Collins Cook 1998 Brief Communication: Gender and Sex: Vive la Difference. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 106:255-259. Walker, Phillip L. 2008 Bioarchaeological Ethics. In Biological Anthropology of the Human Skeleton, edited by M. A. Katzenberg and S. R. Saunders, pp. 3-40. Wiley-Liss, Hoboken, NJ. DISTRIBUTION OF POINTS: Osteology Quizzes (8 x 50): 400 Final Exam 100 Debating Osteology 40 Total 540 DETERMINATION OF YOUR FINAL GRADE (% OUT OF TOTAL POINTS): ABC/NC OPTION: S/NC OPTION: A = 90 – 100% S = 70 – 100% B = 80 - 89% NC = < 70% C = 70 – 79% NC = < 70% ATTENDANCE, PARTICIPATION, and CLASSROOM CONDUCT: Attendance is mandatory. There will be no make-up opportunities for laboratory assignments, quizzes, or exams that are missed because of an unexcused absence. Because we will be handling real human skeletal materials in this class, it is imperative that these remains are treated with the utmost respect. Please treat all skeletal materials with care, using both hands, and held over the lab tables. Never pick up a skull by the zygomatic arch or by the eye orbits. Also, do not articulate the mandible and maxilla unless there is foam padding in-between. If your break a skeletal element you will be required to replace it with a bone from your own body. With the exception of water, food and drinks are not allowed into the laboratory. Failure to follow these rules will result in your excusal from the course. OSTEOLOGY QUIZES Osteology quizzes are designed to test your comprehension of human skeletal anatomy. You will be required to (1) identify the bones of the skeleton, (2) determine what side of the body the bone is from, and (3) identify important characteristics of each bone. Teeth will also be on the quiz. You will be required to identify tooth class, position, side, and whether the tooth is maxillary/mandibular. Some elements on the quiz will appear as fragments of bone. You will also need to be able to distinguish between human and non-human bone. You will have 75 seconds with each bone before passing it to your neighbor. Quizzes are cumulative—once a bone is covered in lecture it is fair game for any quiz remaining in the semester. There will be a final osteology quiz at the end of the semester. A study packet of the bones and features will be provided. FINAL EXAM: The final exam will be a comprehensive review of all material covered in the course, not including bone identification. For that you will receive a separate Final Osteology Quiz. The Final Exam will consist primarily of fill in the blank, supplemented by definitions, short answer, and short essay. PAPER: DEBATING OSTEOLOGY There will be a single final paper for the course due on Thursday, Dec 10 (no extensions!). For this paper, you will critically evaluate a debate centered on the human skeleton in archaeological or forensic contexts. You must first clear that topic with Professor Scherer. Having trouble finding a topic? One interesting debate is in regards to Cannibalism in the American Southwest. Archaeological sites in the region have produced fragmented, cut, and burned human skeletal remains. Some scholars see these remains as evidence of cannibalism while others argue for alternative explanations. In your paper, critically evaluate the evidence for and against cannibalism in this context and take a position – how do you interpret these deposits? Although the focus of your paper will be on the osteological data relevant for the debate, be sure to also discuss the broader archaeological context in which this debate is framed. Papers should be written in 12 point font, double spaced, one inch margins, and using the SAA citation style. A copy of this style guide is available on the course Canvas page or here: http://www.saa.org/AbouttheSociety/Publications/StyleGuide/tabid/984/Default.aspx. Note that the style guide pertains only to how you should reference literature in your paper (parenthetical citations) and how your bibliography should be formatted. You must consult and cite original primary literature (academic books, journals, edited volumes) in writing your paper. RESEARCHING THE HUMAN SKELETON All of your essays require you to engage with scholarly literature pertaining to the human skeleton. The internet is not always a reliable source of information and you are not allowed to cite web pages in your essays. Rather you should be consulting primary academic literature relating to the human skeleton. This includes books and journals issued by academic publishers and written by academics. Google Scholar is an excellent tool that only searches academic journals. If you search within Brown’s network (i.e., on campus or via the VPN) you will be given a link at right to PDFs that are accessible through the library. Journals related to the Human Skeleton include: American Journal of Physical Anthropology Dental Anthropology International Journal of Osteoarchaeology International Journal of Paleopathology The Brown Library is an excellent resource for books.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forensic Facial Reconstruction SUBJECT FORENSIC SCIENCE
    SUBJECT FORENSIC SCIENCE Paper No. and Title PAPER No. 11: Forensic Anthropology Module No. and Title MODULE No. 21: Forensic Facial Reconstruction Module Tag FSC_P11_M21 FORENSIC SCIENCE PAPER No. 11: Forensic Anthropology MODULE No. 21: Forensic Facial Reconstruction TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Learning Outcomes 2. Introduction 2.1. History 3. Types of Identification 3.1. Circumstantial Identification 3.2. Positive Identification 4. Types of Reconstruction 4.1. Two-Dimensional Reconstruction 4.2. Three- Dimensional Reconstruction 4.3. Superimposition 5. Techniques for creating facial reconstruction 6. Steps of facial reconstruction 7. Limitations of Facial Reconstruction 8. Summary FORENSIC SCIENCE PAPER No. 11: Forensic Anthropology MODULE No. 21: Forensic Facial Reconstruction 1. Learning Outcomes After studying this module, you will be able to know- About facial reconstruction About types of identification and reconstruction About various techniques of facial reconstruction and steps of facial reconstruction. About limitations of facial reconstruction 2. Introduction Amalgamation of artistry with forensic science, osteology, anatomy and anthropology to recreate the face of an individual from its skeletal remains is known as Forensic Facial reconstruction. It is also known as forensic facial approximation. It recreates the individual’s face from features of skull. It is used by anthropologists, forensic investigators and archaeologists to help in portraying historical faces, identification of victims of crime or illustrate the features if fossil human ancestors. Two and three dimensional approaches are available for facial reconstruction. In forensic science, it is one of the most controversial and subjective technique. This method is successfully used inspite of this controversy. There are two types of methods of reconstruction which are used i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multidisciplinary Validation Study of Nonhuman Animal Models For
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funding provided by the U.S. Department of Justice to prepare the following resource: Document Title: A Multidisciplinary Validation Study of Nonhuman Animal Models for Forensic Decomposition Research Author(s): Dawnie Wolfe Steadman, Ph.D., D-ABFA Document Number: 251553 Date Received: March 2018 Award Number: 2013-DN-BX-K037 This resource has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. This resource is being made publically available through the Office of Justice Programs’ National Criminal Justice Reference Service. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice Grant # 2013-DN-BX-K037 A Multidisciplinary Validation Study of Nonhuman Animal Models for Forensic Decomposition Research Submitted by: Dawnie Wolfe Steadman, Ph.D., D-ABFA Director of the Forensic Anthropology Center Professor of Anthropology 865-974-0909; [email protected] DUNS: 00-388-7891 EIN: 62-6--1636 The University of Tennessee 1 Circle Park Drive Knoxville, TN 37996-0003 Recipient Account: #R011005404 Final Report This resource was prepared by the author(s) using Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Purpose and Objectives of the Project Over the past century of scientific inquiry into the process of decomposition, nearly every mammal (and other taxa) has been studied.
    [Show full text]
  • Forensic Anthropology
    ADJ14 Advanced Criminal Investigations Forensic Anthropology Forensic Anthropology In any field operation involving human remains, four main tasks may need to be performed: 1. Location a. Finding remains (individual, multiple, visible or buried, informant or search) 2. Mapping a. Placement of remains and associated materials must be mapped in relation to a permanent structure, set as a datum point, and location on a larger map must be pinpointed 3. Excavation a. If remains are interred, must use principles of archaeology to remove. 4. Collection a. Remains must be collected using accepted procedures and must be properly packaged for analysis. Chain of custody is vital. PRELIMINARY ISSUES “A major problem surrounding the recovery of remains is the noninvolvement of forensic anthropologists” (Byers, 2011, p. 75). Investigators often forget to collect/search for all bones – including hand or foot bones. Komar & Potter (2007) demonstrate that the rate of victim identification and determination of cause and manner of death are directly related to the proportion of the body collected on scene. Ensure a proper perimeter is set up as soon as possible. Secure the scene. Watch where you step – bones can be brittle if left in the elements. Watch time – if you are doing an excavation, you are dealing with a death. You can take your time on scene, and these scenes tend to be lengthy – there is no need to rush medical attention. LOCATING REMAINS 1. Determine the location 2. Develop a search plan that is tailored to the unique circumstances of the search area; be aware of what resources you have and what you will need.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Entries
    Volume 1.qxd 9/13/2005 3:29 PM Page ix GGGGG LIST OF ENTRIES Aborigines Anthropic principle Apes, greater Aborigines Anthropocentrism Apes, lesser Acheulean culture Anthropology and business Apollonian Acropolis Anthropology and Aquatic ape hypothesis Action anthropology epistemology Aquinas, Thomas Adaptation, biological Anthropology and the Third Arboreal hypothesis Adaptation, cultural World Archaeology Aesthetic appreciation Anthropology of men Archaeology and gender Affirmative action Anthropology of religion studies Africa, socialist schools in Anthropology of women Archaeology, biblical African American thought Anthropology, careers in Archaeology, environmental African Americans Anthropology, characteristics of Archaeology, maritime African thinkers Anthropology, clinical Archaeology, medieval Aggression Anthropology, cultural Archaeology, salvage Ape aggression Anthropology, economic Architectural anthropology Agricultural revolution Anthropology, history of Arctic Agriculture, intensive Future of anthropology Ardrey, Robert Agriculture, origins of Anthropology, humanistic Argentina Agriculture, slash-and-burn Anthropology, philosophical Aristotle Alchemy Anthropology, practicing Arsuaga, J. L. Aleuts Anthropology, social Art, universals in ALFRED: The ALlele FREquency Anthropology and sociology Artificial intelligence Database Social anthropology Artificial intelligence Algonquians Anthropology, subdivisions of Asante Alienation Anthropology, theory in Assimilation Alienation Anthropology, Visual Atapuerca Altamira cave
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at the History of Forensic Anthropology: Tracing My Academic Genealogy
    ISSN 2150-3311 JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ANTHROPOLOGY RESEARCH ARTICLE VOLUME I 2010 ISSUE 1 A Look at the History of Forensic Anthropology: Tracing My Academic Genealogy Stephanie DuPont Golda Ph.D. Candidate Department of Anthropology University of Missouri Columbia, Missouri Copyright © Stephanie DuPont Golda A Look at the History of Forensic Anthropology: Tracing My Academic Genealogy Stephanie DuPont Golda Ph.D. Candidate Department of Anthropology University of Missouri Columbia, Missouri ABSTRACT Construction of an academic genealogy is an important component of professional socialization as well as an opportunity to review the history of subdisciplines within larger disciplines to discover transitions in the pedagogical focus of broad fields in academia. This academic genealogy surveys the development of forensic anthropology rooted in physical anthropology, as early as 1918, until the present, when forensic anthropology was recognized as a legitimate subfield in anthropology. A historical review of contributions made by members of this genealogy demonstrates how forensic anthropology progressed from a period of classification and description to complete professionalization as a highly specialized and applied area of anthropology. Additionally, the tracing of two academic genealogies, the first as a result of a master’s degree and the second as a result of a doctoral degree, allows for representation of the two possible intellectual lineages in forensic anthropology. Golda: A Look at the History of Forensic Anthropology 35 INTRODUCTION What better way to learn the history of anthropology as a graduate student than to trace your own academic genealogy? Besides, without explicit construction of my own unique, individual, ego-centered genealogy, according to Darnell (2001), it would be impossible for me to read the history of anthropology as part of my professional socialization.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Individuals Through Proteomic Analysis: a New
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funding provided by the U.S. Department of Justice to prepare the following resource: Document Title: Identifying Individuals through Proteomic Analysis: A New Forensic Tool to Rapidly and Efficiently Identify Large Numbers of Fragmentary Human Remains Author(s): City of New York, Office of Chief Medical Examiner Document Number: 254583 Date Received: March 2020 Award Number: 2014-DN-BX-K014 This resource has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. This resource is being made publically available through the Office of Justice Programs’ National Criminal Justice Reference Service. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Final Summary NIJ Grant 2014-DN-BX-K014 Identifying Individuals through Proteomic Analysis: A New Forensic Tool to Rapidly and Efficiently Identify Large Numbers of Fragmentary Human Remains Final Summary: NIJ Grant 2014-DN-BX-K014, Identifying Individuals through Proteomic Analysis: A New Forensic Tool to Rapidly and Efficiently Identify Large Numbers of Fragmentary Human Remains. This summary follows the NIJ Post Award Reporting Requirements issued March 28, 2019 and is divided into the four prescribed sections: 1) Purpose, 2) Research Design & Methods, 3) Data Analysis & Findings, and 4) Implications for Criminal Justice Policy and Practice. ABBREVIATIONS ACN = Acetonitrile mse = mean square error ADD = accumulated degree days MS/MS = tandem mass
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Investigations of Blunt Force Trauma in the Human Skeleton
    EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS OF BLUNT FORCE TRAUMA IN THE HUMAN SKELETON By Mariyam I. Isa A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Anthropology—Doctor of Philosophy 2020 ABSTRACT EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS OF BLUNT FORCE TRAUMA IN THE HUMAN SKELETON By Mariyam I. Isa In forensic anthropology, skeletal trauma is a growing area of analysis that can contribute important evidence about the circumstances of an individual’s death. In bioarchaeology, patterns of skeletal trauma are situated within a cultural context to explore human behaviors across time and space. Trauma analysis involves transforming observations of fracture patterns in the human skeleton into inferences about the circumstances involved in their production. This analysis is based on the foundational assumption that fracture behavior is the nonrandom result of interactions between extrinsic factors influencing the stresses placed on bone and intrinsic factors affecting bone’s ability to withstand these stresses. Biomechanical principles provide the theoretical foundation for generating hypotheses about how various extrinsic and intrinsic factors affect the formation of fracture patterns, and about how these factors can be read from fracture patterns. However, research is necessary to test and refine these hypotheses and, on a more basic level, to document the relationships between “input” variables of interest and fracture “outputs.” One research approach involves the use of forensic and/or clinical case samples. Case- based approaches are important because they provide data from real scenarios and contexts that may be similar to those encountered in unknown cases. However, a limitation is that input variables are not directly measured or controlled and therefore cannot be precisely known.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Facial Reconstruction Laura Verzé Department of Anatomy, Pharmacology and Legal Medicine, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
    ACTA BIOMED 2009; 80: 5-12 © Mattioli 1885 R EVIEW History of facial reconstruction Laura Verzé Department of Anatomy, Pharmacology and Legal Medicine, University of Turin, Turin, Italy Abstract. We briefly describe the history of facial reconstruction in the deceased, starting from the skull. Fa- cial reconstruction has passed through many phases and has been variously motivated, from religion and an- cestor worship, through anthropology, to the identification of lost persons for forensic purposes. Renaissance artists used this technique for modelling and teaching. Techniques changed over the centuries but the ulti- mate goal was to create a convincing likeness of the dead. The two current activities are forensic facial re- construction and reconstructing the personal appearance of ancient people. (www.actabiomedica.it) Key words: Reconstructing facial appearance, craniofacial reconstruction, history Introduction Farkas et al (1994) (1) describe how the variabil- ity of facial proportions ensures the individuality of Faces are fascinating and faces from the past are the human face. particularly intriguing. Reconstructions help to solve problems but they also generate interest and answer First appearance in History: the Neolithic Age questions in a much wider context. Skulls can survive for centuries, even millions of years, and can provide In the past, bones or mummies of the dead were an unrivalled means of identification. In the past, fa- regarded by some cultures as objects of reverence to be cial reconstruction from skull was used for recognition preserved, whereas people of other cultures felt revul- of the deceased and more recently, for teaching anato- sion or phobia. Thus people have developed different my.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of the Stature from the Anthropometric Measurement of Hand Length
    The Internet Journal of Biological Anthropology ISPUB.COM Volume 4 Number 2 Estimation Of The Stature From The Anthropometric Measurement Of Hand Length. V Waghmare, R Gaikwad, N Herekar Citation V Waghmare, R Gaikwad, N Herekar. Estimation Of The Stature From The Anthropometric Measurement Of Hand Length.. The Internet Journal of Biological Anthropology. 2010 Volume 4 Number 2. Abstract Stature or body height is one most important and useful anthropometric parameter that determine the physical identity of an individual. The stature prediction occupies relatively a central position in the anthropometric research. Estimation of stature of and individual from the amputated limbs has obvious significance in the personal identification in the events of murders, accidents or natural disasters. The present study was under taken to measure the stature as well as the hand length to determine whether there is any correlation between the stature and the hand length. The objectives of the study were to measure the hand lengths, to estimate the stature from the hand lengths, and to correlate between the stature and the hand lengths to find out the any multiplication factor for it. The study was carried on two hundred male adult individuals. Measurement of stature and length of right and left side was taken with a standard anthropometer and a sliding caliper respectively. The mean stature and mean length of the right and left were159.01 (S.D. 6.78) cm, 16.92 (S.D. 0.91) cm and 16.46 (S.D. 0.93) cm. respectively. The present study showed significant (p<0.001) positive correlation between the stature and hand lengths.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Facial Reconstruction
    Y T E I C O S L BALKAN JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY A ISSN 1107 - 1141 IC G LO TO STOMA An Introduction to Facial Reconstruction 1 1 SUMMARY Ch. Stavrianos , I. Stavrianou , Late in the 19th century, anatomists, anthropologists and forensic odon- L. Zouloumis 2, D. Mastagas 1 tologists began to study the correlation between the surface soft tissues of Aristotle University, Dental School, the face and the underlying bony structure of the skull. All the techniques of Thessaloniki, Greece facial reconstruction rely upon this hypothesized relationship. The ultimate 1Department of Endodontology 2 aim of all facial reconstructions for forensic purposes is to recreate an in Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery vivo countenance of an individual, normally when no other identifying evi- dence is available, bearing a sufficient visual resemblance to the missing or deceased person, so that it may contribute to their recognition and lead to identification via the discovery of new evidence. This article refers to the techniques of facial reconstruction, including plaster skull reconstruction, computerized reconstruction and video super- imposition. A description of the previous methods is made, followed by a discussion about their application in archaeology and criminology, their re liability and future progress. Keywords: Human Identification; Plaster Scalp Reconstruction; REVIEW PAPER (RP) Skull/Photo Video Superimposition; Computerized 3D Facial Reconstruction Balk J Stom, 2007; 11:76-83 Introduction of facial reconstruction in forensic science in order to produce an image from a skull, which offers a sufficient Facial reconstruction is a technique used to aid in likeness of the living individual. The image will facilitate building an “alive” face out of skeletal remains.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of Human Physique in Forensic Anthropological Cases
    Eurasian Journal of Anthropology Euras J Anthropol 10(2):56-66, 2019 ISSN: 2166-7411 Estimation of human physique in forensic anthropological cases Derya Atamtürk1, Can Pelin2, İzzet Duyar1 1Department of Anthropology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey 2Department of Anatomy, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey Article info Abstract Received: 11 September 2019 Human physique has been ignored in forensic field up to date, but Accepted: 28 December 2019 for a reliable identification it is without doubt of importance. The main aim of the present study is to examine whether it is possible to estimate the somatotype components from anthropometric Key words measurements and/or proportions and to evaluate its use in Forensic anthropology, human forensic anthropology. The study was held on 220 healthy male physique, body typology, subjects aged between 18.05-62.52 years. After anthropometric somatotype estimation, measurements had been taken, somatotypes of each individual anthropometry, body proportions were rated by Heath-Carter technique. Additionally, some proportional variables were also evaluated. Of 220 subjects randomly selected 170 were accepted as calibration group and For correspondence the remaining 50 as validation group. Regression equations were established to estimate somatotype components depending on İzzet Duyar the measurements taken from the calibration group by stepwise Department of Anthropology, regression model and tested on the validation group. The results Faculty of Letters, Istanbul of our statistical analysis indicate that proportional variables are University, Ordu Cad. No. 6 Laleli, better predictors for somatotype components than direct 34134 Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey anthropometric measurements. The ratios of knee, hip and elbow breadth over body height are the best indicator respectively for body typology.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae January 2020
    Curriculum Vitae January 2020 Jane E. Buikstra Arizona State University, School of Human Evolution and Social Change Rm 233, Tempe, AZ 85287-2402 Phone: 480-965-6931 • Fax: 480-965-7671 • [email protected] EDUCATION DePauw University, B.A. (Anthropology) 1967 University of Chicago, M.A. (Anthropology) 1969 University of Chicago, Ph.D. (Anthropology) 1972 HONORS AND AWARDS: McMahan Scholar, Alpha Lambda Delta, 1963-1967 DePauw University Phi Beta Kappa, DePauw University 1967 National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship 1967-1970 Student Advisory Board, Teaching AWard, 1981 Northwestern University National Academy of Sciences, elected 1987 Gerrit Heinrich Kroon Memorial Lecture, University of Amsterdam 1988 Harold H. Swift, Distinguished Service Professor 1989-1995 University of Chicago National Association of Student Anthropologists, AAA, 1991 Service AWard SherWood Washburn Memorial Lecture, University of 1993 California, Berkeley, Department of Anthropology Distinguished Professor of Anthropology 1995-2000 University of New Mexico (UNM) Loren Eiseley Society Lecturer, University of Pennsylvania 1997, 2018 Museum of Anthropology Leslie Spier Distinguished Professor of Anthropology 2001-2005 University of New Mexico UNM General Library Award for Research Achievement 2002 George E. Burch Fellow in Theoretic Medicine 2003-2007 Affiliated Sciences at the Smithsonian Institution Annual Research Lecturer, University of New Mexico 2003 Pomerance AWard for Scientific Contributions to Archaeology, Archaeological Institute of America 2005 Research
    [Show full text]