DOCSLIB.ORG

Gps Location Data Enhancement in Electronic Traffic Records

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gps Location Data Enhancement in Electronic Traffic Records ECONOMIC ENHANCEMENT THROUGH INFRASTRUCTURE STEWARDSHIP GPS LOCATION DATA ENHANCEMENT IN ELECTRONIC TRAFFIC RECORDS JOSEPH P. H AVLICEK, PH.D. RONALD D. BARNES, PH.D. OTCREOS11.1-27-F Oklahoma Transportation Center Phone: 405.732.6580 2601 Liberty Parkway, Suite 110 Fax: 405.732.6586 Midwest City, Oklahoma 73110 www.oktc.org Disclaimer The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. i TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. REPORT NO. 2. GOVERNMENT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENTS CATALOG NO. OTCREOS11.1-27-F 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE GPS Location Data Enhancement in Electronic Traffic January 6, 2013 Records 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR(S) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT Joseph P. Havlicek, Ronald D. Barnes 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. School of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Oklahoma 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. Norman, OK 73019 DTRT06-G-0016 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED Oklahoma Transportation Center Final (Fiscal) 201 ATRC Stillwater, OK 74078 October 1, 2011 – December 31, (Technical) 2601 Liberty Parkway, Suite 110 2012 Midwest City, Ok 73110 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES University Transportation Center 16. ABSTRACT In this project we developed a new GPS-based Geographical Information Exchange Framework (GIEF) to improve the correctness and accuracy of location data reported on electronic police forms in Oklahoma. A second major goal was to provide a base level of automatic vehicle location (AVL) technology to the Oklahoma Highway Patrol (OHP) to improve operational efficiency and inter-agency asset coordination and to enhance police officer safety. The GIEF was successfully developed and integrated with the existing statewide electronic police forms system and was deployed to a select group of OHP Troopers for beta testing. The beta tests demonstrated that high quality position data were acquired from GPS receivers in the field during actual police operations, were used to populate electronic crash reports and citations, and were automatically transmitted to the main Department of Public Safety (DPS) data warehouse and to the statewide court system. High resolution position data were also acquired on a continuous basis for all of the beta test police vehicles and were stored in a new secure data base created for this project. These data were used to demonstrate real-time AVL functionality that will be evaluated by the OHP to determine how it can best be used in the future to improve police operations and officer safety. The enhanced position data provided by this project will be important to a wide range of traffic safety stakeholders for planning and assessing highway improvement projects, highway safety projects, and law enforcement activities directly in terms of public safety impact. The GIEF is fully upwards compatible with the new PARIS system scheduled for deployment in 2013. 17. KEY WORDS 18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT GPS, Emergency Management, No restrictions. This publication is available at Data Accuracy, Safety www.oktc.org and from NTIS. 19. SECURITY CLASSIF. (OF THIS REPORT) 20. SECURITY CLASSIF. 21. NO. OF PAGES 22. PRICE Unclassified (OF THIS PAGE) 56 + covers Unclassified ii SI (METRIC) CONVERSION FACTORS Approximate Conversions to SI Units Approximate Conversions from SI Units Symbol When you Multiply by To Find Symbol Symbol When you Multiply by To Find Symbol know know LENGTH LENGTH in inches 25.40 millimeters mm mm millimeters 0.0394 inches in ft feet 0.3048 meters m m meters 3.281 feet ft yd yards 0.9144 meters m m meters 1.094 yards yd mi miles 1.609 kilometers km km kilometers 0.6214 miles mi AREA AREA square square square square in² 645.2 mm mm² 0.00155 in² inches millimeters millimeters inches square square square square ft² 0.0929 m² m² 10.764 ft² feet meters meters feet square square square square yd² 0.8361 m² m² 1.196 yd² yards meters meters yards ac acres 0.4047 hectares ha ha hectares 2.471 acres ac square square square square mi² 2.590 km² km² 0.3861 mi² miles kilometers kilometers miles VOLUME VOLUME fluid fluid fl oz 29.57 milliliters mL mL milliliters 0.0338 fl oz ounces ounces gal gallons 3.785 liters L L liters 0.2642 gallons gal cubic cubic cubic cubic ft³ 0.0283 m³ m³ 35.315 ft³ feet meters meters feet cubic cubic cubic cubic yd³ 0.7645 m³ m³ 1.308 yd³ yards meters meters yards MASS MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g g grams 0.0353 ounces oz lb pounds 0.4536 kilograms kg kg kilograms 2.205 pounds lb short tons short tons T 0.907 megagrams Mg Mg megagrams 1.1023 T (2000 lb) (2000 lb) TEMPERATURE (exact) TEMPERATURE (exact) ºF degrees (ºF-32)/1.8 degrees ºC ºC degrees 9/5+32 degrees ºF Fahrenheit Celsius Celsius Fahrenheit FORCE and PRESSURE or STRESS FORCE and PRESSURE or STRESS lbf poundforce 4.448 Newtons N N Newtons 0.2248 poundforce lbf lbf/in² poundforce 6.895 kilopascals kPa kPa kilopascals 0.1450 poundforce lbf/in² per square inch per square inch iii Acknowledgements The authors express their appreciation to the Oklahoma Transportation Center (OkTC) for their support of this project. We would also like to thank the Oklahoma Highway Patrol (OHP) for the resources they have committed to the project, particularly in the testing phases. We are grateful to the Oklahoma Highway Safety Office (OHSO) for providing major development funding for the Oklahoma statewide Mobile Data Collection System (MDCS) and Police Automated Records Information System (PARIS) that were instrumental to the successful completion of this project, as well as the Oklahoma County Sheriff’s Office for providing MDCS development funding. Program management for the MDCS and PARIS was provided by OHSO, the Oklahoma Department of Public Safety (DPS), and the Oklahoma Traffic Records Council. Program management for this project was provided by the OkTC. Technical management and oversight were provided by the OHP Law Enforcement Technology Division (LETD). We are grateful to the MDCS and PARIS partner agencies including the OHP, the Oklahoma County Sheriff’s Office, the City of Woodward Police Department, the City of Edmond Police Department, and the City of Oklahoma City Police Department. iv GPS LOCATION DATA ENHANCEMENT IN ELECTRONIC TRAFFIC RECORDS Final Report 7/6/2013 Joseph P. Havlicek, Ph.D. Williams Presidential Professor Ronald D. Barnes, Ph.D. Assistant Professor School of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Oklahoma 110 West Boyd, Room 150 Norman Oklahoma Sponsoring agency: Oklahoma Transportation Center 2601 Liberty Parkway, Suite 110 Midwest City, Oklahoma 73110 v TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1 ..................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 1.1.1. Problem Statement .............................................................................................. 6 1.1.2. Background .......................................................................................................... 8 1.1.3. Objectives ........................................................................................................... 15 Chapter 2 ................................................................................................................... 17 2.1. Development ......................................................................................................... 17 2.1.1. SharpMap Client................................................................................................. 17 2.1.2. GPS Collection Client ........................................................................................ 21 2.1.3. GPS Reporting Service ...................................................................................... 25 2.1.4. GIEF Web Site .................................................................................................... 26 2.1.5. GIEF Web Services ............................................................................................ 27 2.2. Testing ................................................................................................................... 28 2.2.1. Alpha Testing ..................................................................................................... 29 2.2.2. Beta Testing ....................................................................................................... 31 Chapter 3 ................................................................................................................... 34 3.1. Technology Transfer ............................................................................................ 34 Chapter 4 ................................................................................................................... 36 4.1. Conclusions .......................................................................................................... 36 4.2. Recommendations ..............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Crime, Law Enforcement, and Punishment
    Shirley Papers 48 Research Materials, Crime Series Inventory Box Folder Folder Title Research Materials Crime, Law Enforcement, and Punishment Capital Punishment 152 1 Newspaper clippings, 1951-1988 2 Newspaper clippings, 1891-1938 3 Newspaper clippings, 1990-1993 4 Newspaper clippings, 1994 5 Newspaper clippings, 1995 6 Newspaper clippings, 1996 7 Newspaper clippings, 1997 153 1 Newspaper clippings, 1998 2 Newspaper clippings, 1999 3 Newspaper clippings, 2000 4 Newspaper clippings, 2001-2002 Crime Cases Arizona 154 1 Cochise County 2 Coconino County 3 Gila County 4 Graham County 5-7 Maricopa County 8 Mohave County 9 Navajo County 10 Pima County 11 Pinal County 12 Santa Cruz County 13 Yavapai County 14 Yuma County Arkansas 155 1 Arkansas County 2 Ashley County 3 Baxter County 4 Benton County 5 Boone County 6 Calhoun County 7 Carroll County 8 Clark County 9 Clay County 10 Cleveland County 11 Columbia County 12 Conway County 13 Craighead County 14 Crawford County 15 Crittendon County 16 Cross County 17 Dallas County 18 Faulkner County 19 Franklin County Shirley Papers 49 Research Materials, Crime Series Inventory Box Folder Folder Title 20 Fulton County 21 Garland County 22 Grant County 23 Greene County 24 Hot Springs County 25 Howard County 26 Independence County 27 Izard County 28 Jackson County 29 Jefferson County 30 Johnson County 31 Lafayette County 32 Lincoln County 33 Little River County 34 Logan County 35 Lonoke County 36 Madison County 37 Marion County 156 1 Miller County 2 Mississippi County 3 Monroe County 4 Montgomery County
    [Show full text]
  • Dec-Jan COHPS Newsletter
    COHPSCOHPS JANUARY 2018 Concerned Oklahomans for the Highway Patrol Society Newsletter INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Rhoades appointed as DPS Commissioner Chief Harrell promoon 2 On Nov. 14, Gov. Mary Fallin appointed Billy D. “Rusty” Rhoades as Public Safety Commissioner. Thompson award 3 Rhoades began his career with DPS in 1989, Christmas pares 4‐9 serving with the Capitol Patrol. He graduated Oklahoma Trooper Spouses 10 from the 46th OHP Academy in 1991 and held assignments in Troops L (Vinita) and A Purple Heart Awards 11 (Oklahoma City). He was assigned to the FBI COHPS info 12 Gang/Violent Crimes Task Force and the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force; he was promoted to Lieutenant in 2003 and Captain in 2006. He served as legislave liaison for DPS, and was promoted to Major in 2009. “I appreciate the confidence Governor Fallin has shown in me,” Rhoades said upon his appointment. “I will work to guide the Department of Public Safety to connued growth, while maintaining the strong tradions and standards of the agency.” Harrell named as OHP Chief Michael S. Harrell has been named to serve as OHP Chief. Harrell is a graduate of the 48th OHP Academy in 1995. Assignments include Troops K (Pawnee), B (Tulsa), J (Enid), C (Muskogee) and XB (Muskogee Turnpike). He promoted to Lieutenant in 2003, to Captain in 2006 and to Major in 2013. He has served as Troop COHPSCOHPS Commander for several Troops. “I am equally humbled and excited by the www.cohps.org opportunity bestowed upon me by the 501(c)(3) organizaon Commissioner,” Harrell said.
    [Show full text]
  • (BAC) Testing and Reporting for Drivers Involved in Fatal Crashes: Current Practices, Results, and Strategies, 1997-2009 DISCLAIMER
    DOT HS 811 661 August 2012 State Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) Testing and Reporting for Drivers Involved in Fatal Crashes: Current Practices, Results, and Strategies, 1997-2009 DISCLAIMER This publication is distributed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, in the interest of information exchange. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Transportation or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. If trade names, manufacturers’ names, or specific products are mentioned, it is because they are considered essential to the object of the publication and should not be construed as an endorsement. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Suggested APA Format Citation: Casanova, T., Hedlund, J., & Tison, J. (2012, August). State blood alcohol concentration (BAC) testing and reporting for drivers involved in fatal crashes: Current practices, results, and strategies, 1997-2009. (Report No. DOT HS 811 661). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. DOT HS 811 661 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date State Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) Testing and Reporting for Drivers August 2012 Involved in Fatal Crashes: Current Practices, Results, and Strategies, 1997-2009 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Tara Casanova, James Hedlund, and Julie Tison 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Preusser Research Group, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma State Drug Threat Assessment
    ARCHIVED October 2002 Oklahoma Drug Threat Assessment National Drug Intelligence Center U.S. Department of Justice This document may contain dated information. It has been made available to provide access to historical materials. ARCHIVED U.S. Department of Justice National Drug Intelligence Center Product No. 2002-S0387OK-001 October 2002 Oklahoma Drug Threat Assessment National Drug Intelligence Center 319 Washington Street, 5th Floor Johnstown, PA 15901-1622 (814) 532-4601 This document may contain dated information. It has been made available to provide access to historical materials. ARCHIVED Preface This report is a strategic assessment that addresses the status and outlook of the drug threat to Oklahoma. Analytical judgment determined the threat posed by each drug type or category, taking into account the most current quantitative and qualitative information on availability, demand, production or cultivation, transpor- tation, and distribution, as well as the effects of a particular drug on abusers and society as a whole. While NDIC sought to incorporate the latest available information, a time lag often exists between collection and publication of data, particularly demand-related data sets. NDIC anticipates that this drug threat assessment will be useful to policymakers, law enforcement personnel, and treatment providers at the federal, state, and local levels because it draws upon a broad range of information sources to describe and analyze the drug threat to Oklahoma. Cover Photo © Stockbyte This document may contain dated information. It has been made available to provide access to historical materials. ARCHIVED National Drug Intelligence Center Oklahoma Drug Threat Assessment Executive Summary Oklahoma is a destination and transit area for shipments of methamphetamine, cocaine, marijuana, and heroin.
    [Show full text]
  • LEMAS, 2000: Data for Individual State and Local Agencies with 100
    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics, 2000: Data for Individual State and Local Agencies with 100 or More Officers Personnel Expenditures and pay Operations Community policing Policies and programs Equipment Computers and information systems U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics, 2000: Data for Individual State and Local Agencies with 100 or More Officers By Brian A. Reaves, Ph.D. and Matthew J. Hickman BJS Statisticians April 2004, NCJ 203350 U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics Lawrence A. Greenfeld Director Brian Reaves, Ph.D. and Matthew Hickman, BJS statisticians, prepared this report. Thomas Hester edited it. The Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), U.S. Depart- ment of Justice, provided partial funding for the 2000 LEMAS survey. Debra Cohen, Ph.D. and Matthew Scheider, Ph.D. of COPS, assisted with questionnaire development. More infor- mation on COPS can be obtained at their web site <www.usdoj.gov/cops>. The data were collected and processed by the U.S. Census Bureau, with assis- tance from BJS. Census Bureau staff, under the supervision of Latrice Brogsdale-Davis and Charlene Sebold included Theresa Reitz, Martha Greene, Patricia Torreyson, Bill Bryner, and Paula Kinard. ii Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics, 2000 Table 7b. Number of district/precinct stations, types
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Highway Patrol Accident Reports
    Oklahoma Highway Patrol Accident Reports Stroppy and protanomalous Matthew collets her Tagus twitters or chaff adversely. Humped Garrot waive Fridays. Flappy Ingamar never lames so withal or albumenises any scrums cohesively. We are a result of people have each has shot two people may have been found on friday. The ohp troopers investigate boating accidents that occurred near houston had some clouds for managing all property damage, though local vaccine providers have video: how can i was accused of. Emergency red and highway patrol accident? With an oklahoma highway in any law center in tulsa. Investigators conduct discharge from his course of accident attorneys and fully all seized by supporting other indirect activities for materials. The turner turnpike of this troop so tracks all types as a fleet of a snowy tuesday, oklahoma highway accident reports provided medical agencies does not immediately contact a large boulder fell. Down a state agencies in traffic stop terry. The accident results in muskogee after an accident in an unknown medical care about five were without unnecessary danger. Brown continues four days after his siren activated national weather service. During such requests may be able sell vehicles on slick road. For this site contains only information, or turnpike section provides state law enforcement. He was critically injured due upon how hard crews have died. The oklahoma highway patrol says terry was recovered from stroud. The victims were not been missing construction worker has been injured in patrol news on what type drugs, exchange information you have warned that. The capitol complex in. The capitol complex.
    [Show full text]
  • ROCIC IMPACT in Texas
    ROCIC IMPACT IN Texas In FY2016 — The Regional Information 208 Member Agencies Sharing Systems (RISS) 39,259 Sworn Personnel Served mission is to assist local, state, 1,795 Officers and Personnel Trained federal, and tribal criminal 3,339 Intelligence Database Inquiries justice agencies by providing adaptive solutions and services 1,265 Intelligence Database Hits that facilitate information 742 Requests for Information on 1,313 Targets sharing, support criminal 1,796 Analytical and Forensic Products Delivered investigations, and promote 105,906 Bulletins and Special Reports Disseminated officer safety. 383 Pieces of Investigative Equipment Loaned The Regional Organized Crime Information Center (ROCIC), Texas Leadership for ROCIC one of the six RISS Centers, In addition to federal monitoring, ROCIC is governed by a board of began providing services to its directors composed of an elected member and a proxy from each of the members in 1973. The ROCIC 14 states in the ROCIC region. In Texas, these leadership positions are region consists of: held by: Board Member: Board Proxy: • Alabama Chief Joseph Costa Executive Director Larry Gray • Arkansas DeSoto Police Department Texas and Southwestern • Florida (469) 658-3002 Cattle Raisers Association • Georgia (800) 242-7820, Ext. 112 • Kentucky • Louisiana • Mississippi Examples of Successes in Texas • North Carolina • Oklahoma Houston County District Attorney’s Office • Puerto Rico Analytical Services • South Carolina Embezzlement: An ROCIC intelligence analyst accepted an extensive • Tennessee amount of bank and business records from the Houston County District • Texas Attorney’s Office in an embezzlement case and produced clear and • U.S. Virgin Islands straightforward documentation to present to the Houston County grand • Virginia jury, which returned indictments against multiple defendants accused • West Virginia of stealing more than $1 million over a lengthy period of time from a business in Crockett.
    [Show full text]
  • State Police (Also Called State Troopers Or Highway Patrol) Are a Police Body Unique to 49 of the U.S
    United States In the United States, state police (also called state troopers or highway patrol) are a police body unique to 49 of the U.S. states, having statewide authority to conduct law enforcement activities and criminal investigations. Hawaii, being a widely dispersed A North Carolina state trooper's car archipelago, has four separate on I-85 in 2008. county-based police agencies, rather than a single statewide police agency. In general, these police agencies perform functions outside the jurisdiction of the county sheriff, such as enforcing traffic laws on state highways and interstate expressways, overseeing the security of the state capitol complex, protecting the governor, training new officers for local police forces too small to operate an academy, providing technological and scientific services, supporting local police and helping to coordinate multi-jurisdictional task force activity in serious or complicated cases in those states that grant full police powers statewide. A general trend has been to bring all of these agencies under a state Department of Public Safety. Additionally, they may serve under different state departments such as the Highway Patrol under the state Department of Transportation and the Marine patrol under the state Department of Natural Resources. Twenty-two U.S. states use the term "State Police", fifteen use the term "Highway Patrol", seven use the term "State Patrol", three use the term "State Highway Patrol", while Alaska's agency is the "Division of Alaska State Troopers" and Arkansas has a "Highway Police" in addition to its "State Police". The term "highway patrol" tends to be more common in the southeast and mountain west States.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA ROBERT DENNIS MARTIN, NOT FOR PUBLICATION Appellant, VS. No. F-2017-426 THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, FILED N COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAI.S Appellee. STATE OF OKLAHOMA SUMMARY OPINION MAY 172018 KUEHN, JUDGE: Appellant, Robert Dennis Martin, was convicted by a jury in Caddo County District Court, Case No. CF-2016-27, of Aggravated Trafficking in Methamphetamine (63 O.S.Supp.2015, § 2-415(D)), After Conviction of a Felony. On April 19, 2017, the Honorable S. Wyatt Hill, Associate District Judge, sentenced him in accordance with the jury's recommendation to life imprisonment and a fine of $500,000. This appeal followed. Appellant raises seven propositions of error in support of his appeal: PROPOSITION I. THE SEARCH OF MR. MARTIN'S VEHICLE VIOLATED HIS FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS BECAUSE THE AGENT IMPERMISSIBLY EXTENDED THE DURATION OF THE STOP, ACCORDINGLY, THE TRIAL COURT ERRED WHEN IT DENIED APPELLANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS. PROPOSITION II. MR. MARTIN'S FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS RIGHTS PURSUANT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION WERE VIOLATED WHEN THE JURY WAS ERRONEOUSLY INSTRUCTED AS TO THE RANGE OF PUNISHMENT FOR AGGRAVATED TRAFFICKING, METHAMPHETAMINE. PROPOSITION III. ADMISSION OF OTHER BAD ACTS EVIDENCE PREJUDICED THE JURY, DEPRIVED MR. MARTIN OF HIS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL, AND WARRANTS REVERSAL OF THE SENTENCES. /-pç1u £ e-*' 4 PROPOSITION IV. THE TRIAL COURT FAILED TO PROPERLY INSTRUCT THE JURY THAT MR. MARTIN WOULD RECEIVE ADDITIONAL PUNISHMENT OF METHAMPHETAMINE REGISTRATION IF FOUND GUILTY. PROPOSITION V. ALTERNATIVELY, REVERSAL IS REQUIRED BECAUSE ANY FAILURE TO ADEQUATELY AND COMPLETELY PRESERVE ISSUES FOR REVIEW IN THIS COURT WAS THE RESULT OF THE INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL.
    [Show full text]
  • CDLPI Grant Spreadsheets 2019-2013 Update with Decline Noted
    Commercial Driver’s License Program Implementation High Priority Grant Awards by Fiscal Year State Organizaton FY 2019 FY 2018 FY 2017 FY 2016 FY 2015 FY 2014 FY 2013 AL Alabama Department of Public Safety $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,072,199 $0 AK Alabama Law Enforcement Agency $249,233 $2,311,971 $754,061 $1,496,275 $0 $0 $1,335,054 VA American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators $5,460,873 $5,603,442 $5,423,757 $3,827,969 $1,069,121 $2,254,501 $4,255,266 AR Arkansas Administrative Office of the Courts $1,535,335 $0 $0 $0 $535,144 $0 $0 AR Arkansas State Police $0 $0 $389,423 $407,297 $0 $0 $1,285,933 CA California Department of Motor Vehicles $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,028,239 $1,459,729 $198,310 CO Colorado Department of Revenue $254,332 $0 $1,047,121 $0 $293,727 $139,946 $0 MD Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance $66,020 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 VA Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Motor Vehicles $1,755,953* $147,792 $0 $138,060 $87,911 $1,122,215 $46,978 CT Connecticut Department of Motor Vehicles $1,558,895 $1,709,623 $1,101,001 $1,169,318 $3,404,916 $2,791,606 $385,185 DE Delaware Department of Transportation $187,494 $657,392 $0 $226,580 $268,473 $0 $0 DC District of Columbia Motor Vehicles $329,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 KY Executive Office of the Commonwealth of Kentucky $1,804,493 $894,140 $615,727 $0 $552,720 $242,356 $48,199 FL Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles $0 $915,907 $0 $0 $0 $0 $487,398 GA Georgia Department of Driver Services $1,048,435 $312,576 $756,848 $340,681 $506,592 $185,251 $69,175 HI Hawaii Department of Transportation
    [Show full text]
  • PCP: Increasing Availability and Abuse
    ARCHIVED INTELLIGENCE BULLETIN PCP: Increasing Availability and Abuse Product No. 2004-L0424-002 SEPTEMBER 2004 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE in 1967. In 1978 PCP was transferred from Sched- ule III to Schedule II of the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 due to reported increases in abuse. Abuse PCP abuse appears to be increasing, particu- larly in metropolitan areas. According to the Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN), the estimated DEA and Maine Drug Enforcement Agency and Maine Drug Enforcement DEA number of emergency department (ED) mentions for PCP rose steadily each year from 3,663 men- Law enforcement, seizure, and treatment data tions in 1999 to 7,648 mentions in 2002. Among indicate that PCP (phencyclidine) availability and DAWN reporting cities, ED mentions for PCP were abuse are increasing in some areas of the country, highest in Washington, D.C., (1,302), Philadelphia particularly in metropolitan areas. Primarily pro- (1,144), and Los Angeles (991). In the same year, duced by street gangs and criminal groups operating the Community Epidemiology Work Group in California, the drug is distributed and abused (CEWG) reported that indicators increased in five throughout the country. Law enforcement agencies areas—Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Texas, report that PCP is rising in popularity among ado- and Washington, D.C. According to the Treatment lescents and young adults. Though considered a Episode Data Set (TEDS), the number of PCP- minor threat in comparison with other illicit drugs, related treatment admissions to publicly funded the rising availability and abuse of PCP pose a facilities nationwide increased from 2,210 admis- growing threat to the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • APAC 2018 DPS Performance Assessment Final Report
    OKLAHOMA EFFICIENCY REVIEW FINAL Department of Public Safety TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary II. Mandates Analysis III. Budget Process Analysis IV. Opportunities Analysis EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The A&M team organized its review of the Department to coincide with the four interconnected key drivers of efficiency. Summary of Approach 1. Mandates: Reviewed the titles and statutes governing the Department and its divisions to determine if these align with the functions or services provided by each division within the Department. Mandates Budget 2. Budget and Performance: Reviewed the Department’s current budget development process and assessed to what extent the Department utilizes performance measures to coincide with this process. 1. Opportunities: Identified opportunities for increasing the Department’s efficiency in meeting its mission; provided estimates for investment or cost savings related to those opportunities. Opportunities Performance A thorough review of departmental mandates, budget process and performance measures is critical to determine opportunities for increased operational or financial efficiency. Executive . Mandates . Budget Process . Opportunities 2 Summary Analysis Analysis Analysis EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The A&M team implemented the process below across each Department to document observations and develop recommendations for increased efficiency. ApproachSummary to Mandates of Process Analysis Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Develop Recommendations Gather Information Document Observations 1. Conduct research 1. Document key 1. Determine
    [Show full text]