DOCSLIB.ORG

Hinds County, Mississippi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED APRIL 8, 2016 TWO (2) NEW ISSUES Ratings: Underlying BOOK-ENTRY ONLY Moody’s: Aa2 (See “Ratings” herein) In the opinion of Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, Jackson, Mississippi (“Bond Counsel”), assuming compliance by the County (as defined herein) with certain tax covenants, interest on the Series 2016A Bonds (as defined herein) is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes under existing statutes, regulations, rulings and court decisions. Interest on the Series 2016A Bonds is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations; however, interest on the Series 2016A Bonds is taken into account in determining adjusted current earnings for purposes of computing the alternative minimum tax imposed on corporations. See “TAX MATTERS” herein for a description of certain other federal tax consequences of ownership of the Series 2016A Bonds. Interest on the Series 2016B Bonds (as defined herein) should be treated as includable in gross income of the holders thereof for federal income tax purposes. Bond Counsel is further of the opinion that under existing laws, regulations, rulings and judicial decisions, interest on the Series 2016 Refunding Bonds (as defined herein) is exempt from income taxation in the State (as defined herein). See “TAX MATTERS” herein and APPENDIX D - FORMS OF OPINIONS OF BOND COUNSEL attached hereto. $6,085,000* $2,185,000* HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING TAXABLE GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2016A REFUNDING BONDS, (Tax-Exempt) SERIES 2016B Dated: Date of Delivery Due: November 1, as shown on the inside front cover Interest on the $6,085,000* Hinds County, Mississippi General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A (Tax-Exempt) (the “Series 2016A Bonds”) will be payable on May 1 and November 1 of each year, commencing November 1, 2016. Interest on the $2,185,000* Hinds County, Mississippi Taxable General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2016B (the “Series 2016B Bonds” and together with the Series 2016A Bonds, the “Series 2016 Refunding Bonds”) will be payable on May 1 and November 1 of each year, commencing November 1, 2016. The Board of Supervisors of Hinds County, Mississippi (the “County”) has designated US Bank National Association, Olive Branch, Mississippi to serve as paying agent, transfer agent and registrar of the Series 2016 Refunding Bonds (the “Paying and Transfer Agent”). The Series 2016 Refunding Bonds will be issued as fully registered bonds in the denomination of $5,000, or any integral multiple thereof, and registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, which will act as securities depository for the Series 2016 Refunding Bonds. See “DESCRIPTION OF THE SERIES 2016 REFUNDING BONDS - Book-Entry-Only System” and APPENDIX E. The Series 2016 Refunding Bonds are general obligations of the County for which the full faith, credit and resources of the County are pledged. The Series 2016A Bonds are subject to optional and/or mandatory sinking fund redemption, as applicable, prior to their respective maturities. The Series 2016B Bonds are not subject to redemption prior to their respective maturities. See “DESCRIPTION OF THE SERIES 2016 REFUNDING BONDS – “Redemption Provisions of the Series 2016A Bonds” and “Redemption Provisions of the Series 2016B Bonds.” The Series 2016A Bonds are being offered as “qualified tax-exempt obligations” within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. THIS COVER PAGE CONTAINS CERTAIN INFORMATION FOR QUICK REFERENCE ONLY. IT IS NOT A SUMMARY OF THIS ISSUE. PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS MUST READ THIS ENTIRE OFFICIAL STATEMENT TO OBTAIN INFORMATION ESSENTIAL TO THE MAKING OF AN INFORMED INVESTMENT DECISION. The Series 2016 Refunding Bonds are offered subject to the final approving opinions of Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, Jackson, Mississippi, Bond Counsel. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the Underwriter (described below) by their counsel, Owens Moss, PLLC, Jackson, Mississippi. Certain legal matters with respect to the County will be passed upon by its counsels, Pieter Teeuwissen, Esq. and Anthony Simon, Esq., Jackson, Mississippi. Comer Capital Group, Jackson, Mississippi, is serving as Financial Advisor to the County in connection with the sale and issuance of the Series 2016 Refunding Bonds. It is expected that delivery of the Series 2016 Refunding Bonds in definitive form will be made on or about April 28, 2016. This Preliminary Official Statement and the information contained herein are subject to completion or amendment without notice. Under no circumstances shall this Preliminary Official Statement constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of sell or to Preliminary shall this circumstances Under no Official Statement constitute an offer This Preliminary notice. without amendment or herein are subject to completion contained the information and Official Statement This Preliminary jurisdiction. such any of securities the priorqualification under or laws registration to unlawful be would sale solicitation, or jurisdiction these securitiesof sale such offer, which in any in any be shall there nor buy to an offer by the Issuer of these securitiesfor purposes within the meaning of Rule 15(c)2-12 SecuritiesOfficial Statement is deemed final Exchange Act of 1934 of such rule. * Preliminary, subject to change $6,085,000* HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2016A (Tax-Exempt) MATURITY SCHEDULE* Maturity Principal Interest (November 1) Amount* Rate Yield CUSIP** 2016 $50,000.00 2017 75,000.00 2018 10,000.00 2019 5,000.00 2020 500,000.00 2021 575,000.00 2022 605,000.00 2023 615,000.00 2024 640,000.00 2025 140,000.00 2026 145,000.00 2027 155,000.00 2028 160,000.00 2029 165,000.00 2030 175,000.00 2031 180,000.00 2032 185,000.00 2033 985,000.00 2034 200,000.00 2035 305,000.00 2036 215,000.00 $2,185,000* HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI TAXABLE GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2016B MATURITY SCHEDULE* Maturity Principal Interest (November 1) Amount* Rate Yield CUSIP** 2018 $780,000.00 2019 805,000.00 2020 600,000.00 ___________________________________ * Preliminary, subject to change. **CUSIP is a registered trademark of the American Bankers Association. CUSIP data herein is provided by Standard and Poor's CUSIP Service Bureau, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. This data is not intended to create a database and does not serve in any way as a substitute for the CUSIP services. The CUSIP numbers listed above are being provided solely for the convenience of the holders of the Series 2016 Refunding Bonds only. The County and the Underwriter do not make any representation with respect to such numbers or undertake any responsibility for their accuracy. The CUSIP numbers are subject to being changed after the issuance of the Series 2016 Refunding Bonds as a result of various subsequent actions, including but not limited to a refunding in whole or in part of the Series 2016 Refunding Bonds. HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Robert Graham, District 1 Darrel McQuirter, District 2 Peggy Hobson Calhoun, District 3 Mike Morgan, District 4 Bobby “Bobcat” McGowan, District 5 CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Eddie Jean Carr COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Carmen Y. Davis COUNSEL TO COUNTY Pieter Teeuwissen and Anthony Simon Jackson, Mississippi FINANCIAL ADVISOR TO COUNTY Comer Capital Group Jackson, Mississippi BOND COUNSEL Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC Jackson, Mississippi UNDERWRITER'S COUNSEL Owens Moss, PLLC Jackson, Mississippi [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] NO DEALER, BROKER, SALES REPRESENTATIVE OR OTHER PERSON HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED BY THE COUNTY OR THE UNDERWRITER SHOWN ON THE COVER HEREOF TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED HEREIN IN CONNECTION WITH THE OFFERING OF THE SERIES 2016 REFUNDING BONDS AND, IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH OTHER INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATION MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED BY ANY OF THE FOREGOING. THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR THE SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THE SERIES 2016 REFUNDING BONDS NOR SHALL THERE BE ANY SALE OF THE SERIES 2016 REFUNDING BONDS BY ANY PERSON IN ANY JURISDICTION IN WHICH IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR SUCH PERSON TO MAKE SUCH AN OFFER, SOLICITATION OR SALE. THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREIN HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM THE COUNTY AND OTHER SOURCES THAT ARE BELIEVED TO BE RELIABLE. THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREIN CONCERNING DTC HAS BEEN FURNISHED BY DTC AND NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE BY THE COUNTY OR THE UNDERWRITER AS TO THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS THEREOF. THE INFORMATION AND EXPRESSIONS OF OPINION HEREIN ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE, AND NEITHER THE DELIVERY OF THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT NOR ANY SALE MADE HEREUNDER SHALL, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, CREATE ANY IMPLICATION THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE AFFAIRS OF THE COUNTY SINCE THE DATE HEREOF. THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT CONTAINS FORECASTS, PROJECTIONS AND ESTIMATES THAT ARE BASED ON EXPECTATIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS WHICH EXISTED AT THE TIME SUCH FORECASTS, PROJECTIONS AND ESTIMATES WERE PREPARED. IN LIGHT OF THE IMPORTANT FACTORS THAT MAY MATERIALLY AFFECT ECONOMIC CONDITIONS IN THE COUNTY, THE INCLUSION IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT OF SUCH FORECASTS, PROJECTIONS AND ESTIMATES SHOULD NOT BE REGARDED AS A REPRESENTATION BY THE COUNTY THAT SUCH FORECASTS, PROJECTIONS AND ESTIMATES WILL OCCUR. SUCH FORECASTS, PROJECTIONS AND ESTIMATES ARE NOT INTENDED AS REPRESENTATIONS OF FACT OR GUARANTEES OF RESULTS. IF AND WHEN INCLUDED IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT, THE WORDS "EXPECTS," "FORECASTS," "PROJECTS," "INTENDS," "ANTICIPATES," "ESTIMATES" AND ANALOGOUS EXPRESSIONS ARE INTENDED TO IDENTIFY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND ANY SUCH STATEMENTS INHERENTLY ARE SUBJECT TO A VARIETY OF RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES THAT COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE PROJECTED.
Recommended publications
  • Trends in Telephone Service

    Trends in Telephone Service

    Trends in Telephone Service Industry Analysis and Technology Division Wireline Competition Bureau August 2008 This report is available for reference in the FCC’s Information Center at 445 12th Street, S.W., Courtyard Level. Copies may be purchased by calling Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington DC 20554 at 800-378-3160, facsimile 202-488-5563, or via e-mail [email protected]. The report can also be downloaded from the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports Internet site at: www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/trends.html. Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………….……………………………………………… 1-1 Access Charges…………………………………………………………………………………… 1-1 Table 1.1 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges……………………………………………………… 1-3 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges…………………………………………………… 1-4 Table 1.3 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier…………...……………………………… 1-5 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier……………………………… ……… 1-6 Advanced Telecommunications…………………………………………………………………… 2-1 Table 2.1 High-Speed Lines………………………………………………………………………… 2-3 Chart 2.1 Total High-Speed Lines…………………………………………………………………… 2-3 Chart 2.2 High-Speed Lines by Technology………………………………………………………… 2-3 Table 2.2 Advanced Services Lines………………………………………………………………… 2-4 Chart 2.3 Advanced Services Lines………………………………………………………………… 2-4 Chart 2.4 Advanced Services Lines by Technology………………………………………………… 2-4 Table 2.3 Residential High-Speed Lines…………………………………………………………… 2-5 Chart 2.5 Residential High-Speed Lines……………………………………………………………
  • Safety on a Drilling Rig: Is It Safety Culture? Jonathan Wade Henson Eastern Kentucky University

    Safety on a Drilling Rig: Is It Safety Culture? Jonathan Wade Henson Eastern Kentucky University

    Eastern Kentucky University Encompass Online Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship January 2013 Safety On A Drilling Rig: Is It Safety Culture? Jonathan Wade Henson Eastern Kentucky University Follow this and additional works at: https://encompass.eku.edu/etd Part of the Occupational Health and Industrial Hygiene Commons Recommended Citation Henson, Jonathan Wade, "Safety On A Drilling Rig: Is It Safety Culture?" (2013). Online Theses and Dissertations. 178. https://encompass.eku.edu/etd/178 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Encompass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Online Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Encompass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SAFETY ON A DRILLING RIG: IS IT SAFETY CULTURE? By JONATHAN HENSON Bachelor of Science Excelsior College Albany, New York 2006 Associates of Science Tidewater Community College Portsmouth, Virginia 1995 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Eastern Kentucky University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE August, 2013 Copyright © 2013 Jonathan Henson All Rights Reserved ii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my wife, Patty Jean Henson who has given me all the support I could ask for and encouragement during the low spots we all endure for such projects. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To my former employers, Maersk Drilling USA and present employer, BG- Group, for providing me with the time, survey pool and resources to complete this thesis. This subject matter is valuable to this author and hopefully to those who do the hard work of extracting hydrocarbons from the earth in hazardous conditions.
  • Numbering Resource Utilization in the United States NRUF Data As of June 30, 2010 Porting and Toll-Free Data As of September 30, 2010

    Numbering Resource Utilization in the United States NRUF Data As of June 30, 2010 Porting and Toll-Free Data As of September 30, 2010

    Numbering Resource Utilization in the United States NRUF Data as of June 30, 2010 Porting and Toll-Free Data as of September 30, 2010 Craig Stroup John Vu Industry Analysis and Technology Division Wireline Competition Bureau April 2013 This report is available for reference in the FCC's Reference Information Center, Courtyard Level, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. Copies may be purchased by contacting Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, telephone (800) 378-3160, or via their website at www.bcpiweb.com. The report can also be downloaded from the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports Internet site at www.fcc.gov/wcb/stats. Contents TEXT Executive Summary................................................................................................................................1 Findings ..................................................................................................................................................1 Background.............................................................................................................................................2 Analysis and Results...............................................................................................................................4 Additional Information ...........................................................................................................................9 Technical Details ..................................................................................................................................10
  • 2010 Official Journal and Yearbook Volume 1

    2010 Official Journal and Yearbook Volume 1

    MISSISSIPPI CONFERENCE THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 2010 OFFICIAL JOURNAL AND YEARBooK Volume 1 Arise! Shine! Grow! 2010 JOURNAL MISSISSIPPI CONFERENCE of THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH Uniting THE MISSISSIPPI CONFERENCE (1972) and THE NORTH MISSISSIPPI CONFERENCE (1973) TWENTY SECOND SESSION held in Jackson, MS at Jackson Convention Complex June 11-13, 2010 Journal Editor — Garry Ruff Conference Secretary — Roger Puhr Assistant — Frenchye Magee and Rheannon R. Miller Statistician — David Greer All photos courtesy of the Mississippi United Methodist Communications Bishop Hope Morgan Ward TABLE OF CONTENTS Section I - Administration A. Annual Conference Officers .........................................................................................................5 B. Conference Leadership Council ......................................................................................................6 C. Annual Conference Leadership Groups .........................................................................................9 D. Institution Trustees/Directors ....................................................................................................... 12 E. Tellers ............................................................................................................................................. 22 F. District Boards/Committees .......................................................................................................... 22 Section II - Conference Directory A. Clergy, Diaconal/Deaconess .........................................................................................................
  • New Jackson Lawsuit Gold Coast.Pdf

    New Jackson Lawsuit Gold Coast.Pdf

    Case: 25CI1:21-cv-00398-TTG Document #: 2 Filed: 06/24/2021 Page 1 of 18 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICCT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI Plaintiff, V. CAUSE NO. .J I -- 3 9 q GOLD COAST COMMODITIES, INC., PARTRIDGE-SIBLEY INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC., THOMAS DOUGLAS, ROBERT DOUGLAS, DONALD R. PARTRIDGE, JUSTIN MAHFOUZ, LOUIE GARRETT, and JOHN DOES 1-5 Defendants. PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demanded) Plaintiff, the City of Jackson, Mississippi (the "City" or "Plaintiff'), files this Original Complaint against Defendants, Gold Coast Commodities, Inc., Partridge-Sibley Industrial Services, Inc., Thomas Douglas, Robert Douglas, Donald R. Partridge, Justin Mahfouz, Louie Garrett and John Does 1 - 5 (collectively, the "Defendants"), and hereby pleads as follows: I. PARTIES 1. Plaintiff, the City of Jackson, is a municipal corporation and subdivision of the State of Mississippi and is organized and existing under the laws of the State of Mississippi. The City of Jackson is a mid-sized city with a population of approximately 165,000 residents. The Jackson Wastewater Treatment System serves residents and citizens within Hinds County, Mississippi and surrounding areas. The City is governed by the Mayor and City Council. The Mayor is elected by the at-large vote of the residents and citizens of the City. There are seven Case: 25CI1:21-cv-00398-TTG Document #: 2 Filed: 06/24/2021 Page 2 of 18 members of the City Council, each elected to represent the citizens and residents of one of the City's seven Wards. This lawsuit is filed by authority of the Mayor of the City of Jackson and with approval of the City Council as the elected representatives of the citizens and residents of the City.
  • State of Mississippi 1999

    State of Mississippi 1999

    State of Mississippi 1999 Government Telephone Directory Telecommunications Enhancements On September 21, 1998, modifications were made to the DEFINITY Generic 3 telecommunications system that impacted dialing procedures for internal, local and long distance calls. If your telephone number begins with 359, 576 or 961 (PSC only), these modifications will apply. To reach an extension in the Complex, including the Mississippi Department of Health, you may utilize our five digit dialing feature as follows: For 359 numbers, dial 9 + extension number; For Health 576 numbers, dial 6 + extension number; For the PSC 961 numbers, dial 1 + extension number. Dial 90 to access local and long distance dialing. New Calling Cards Effective August 15,1998, the state began using the new calling cards. Your new calling card should have ITS printed on the front. The dialing instructions are slightly different and are printed on the back of the card for convenience. Telephone Directory January 1999 This directory is provided for the use of state agencies and their employees by the Mississippi Department of Information Technology Services (ITS). ITS is responsible for management and administration of statewide governmental communications services for the State of Mississippi. David L. Litchliter Executive Director Mississippi Department of Information Technology Services Mississippi State Government Telephone Directory Emergency Numbers Emergency Calls Only Within Jackson City Limits dial 911 Introduction Fire ● Police ● Ambulance ● Poison Control ● Rape ● Abuse ● Medical Emergency How To Report An Emergency: Non-Emergency Numbers: Call the emergency number. Fire Department . 969-3333 State type of emergency. Police Communications . 960-1234 Give exact location (address or Hinds County Sheriff .
  • Arise! Shine! 2009 Journal Mississippi Conference of the United Methodist Church Uniting the Mississippi Conference (1972) and the North Mississippi Conference (1973)

    Arise! Shine! 2009 Journal Mississippi Conference of the United Methodist Church Uniting the Mississippi Conference (1972) and the North Mississippi Conference (1973)

    MISSISSIPPI CONFERENCE THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 2009 OFFICIAL JOURNAL AND YEARBooK Volume 1 Arise! Shine! 2009 JOURNAL MISSISSIPPI CONFERENCE of THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH Uniting THE MISSISSIPPI CONFERENCE (1972) and THE NORTH MISSISSIPPI CONFERENCE (1973) TWENTY FIRST SESSION held in Jackson, MS at Jackson Convention Complex June 12-14, 2009 Journal Editor — Larry White Conference Secretary — Roger Puhr Assistant — Jay Biedenharn and Rehannon R. Miller Statistician — David Greer All photos courtesy of the Mississippi United Methodist Advocate Bishop Hope Morgan Ward TABLE OF CONTENTS Section I - Administration A. Annual Conference Officers .........................................................................................................5 B. Annual Conference Leadership .......................................................................................................6 C. Annual Conference Leadership Groups .........................................................................................9 D. Institution Ministries ..................................................................................................................... 12 E. Tellers ............................................................................................................................................. 22 F. District Boards/Committees .......................................................................................................... 22 Section II - Conference Directory A. Clergy, Diaconal/Deaconess .........................................................................................................
  • Trends in Telephone Service

    Trends in Telephone Service

    Trends in Telephone Service Industry Analysis and Technology Division Wireline Competition Bureau September 2010 This report is available for reference in the FCC’s Information Center at 445 12th Street, S.W., Courtyard Level. Copies may be purchased by calling Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington DC 20554 at 800-378-3160, facsimile 202-488-5563, or via e-mail [email protected]. The report can also be downloaded from the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports Internet site at: www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/trends.html. Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………….……………………………………………… 1-1 Access Charges…………………………………………………………………………………… 1-1 Table 1.1 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges……………………………………………………… 1-3 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges…………………………………………………… 1-4 Table 1.3 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier…………...……………………………… 1-5 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier………………………………………… 1-7 Advanced Telecommunications…………………………………………………………………… 2-1 Table 2.1 High-Speed Connections………………………………………………………………… 2-3 Chart 2.1 Fixed High-Speed Connections…………………………………………………………… 2-3 Chart 2.2 High-Speed Connections by Technology………………………………………………… 2-3 Table 2.2 Residential High-Speed Connections…………………………………………………… 2-4 Chart 2.3 Residential Fixed High-Speed Connections……………………………………………… 2-4 Chart 2.4 Residential High-Speed Connections by Technology…………………………………… 2-4 Table 2.3 Total High-Speed Connections by Speed Tier…………………………………………… 2-5 Table 2.4 Residential High-Speed Connections by Speed Tier…………………………………… 2-6 Table 2.5 High-Speed Connections by Technology by State……………………………………… 2-7 Table 2.6 Percentage of High-Speed Connections by Download Speed by State…………………… 2-9 Table 2.7 Percentage of Residential End-User Premises with Access to High-Services by State … 2-11 Table 2.8 Residential Fixed High-Speed Connections and Households by State……………………2-12 Chart 2.5 Percentage of U.S.
  • Numbering Resource Utilization in the United States

    Numbering Resource Utilization in the United States

    Numbering Resource Utilization in the United States NRUF data as of June 30, 2009 Porting and Toll-Free data as of September 30, 2009 Craig Stroup and John Vu Industry Analysis and Technology Division Wireline Competition Bureau Federal Communications Commission February 2010 This report is available for reference in the FCC's Reference Information Center, Courtyard Level, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. Several private firms specialize in locating, duplicating, and distributing FCC documents. Documents may be purchased by calling Best Copy and Printing, Inc. at (202) 488-5300 or via their website at www.bcpiweb.com. This and many other useful reports can also be downloaded from the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports Internet site at www.fcc.gov/wcb/stats. Numbering Resource Utilization in the United States NRUF Data as of June 30, 2009 Porting and Toll-Free Data as of September 30, 2009 Executive Summary This is the Federal Communications Commission’s report on numbering resource utilization in the United States.1 In this report, we summarize an ongoing systematic collection of comprehensive data on the utilization of telephone numbers within the United States. The underlying information was acquired from carriers holding numbering resources and was analyzed as part of our ongoing assessment of the efficacy of numbering resource optimization measures prescribed by the Commission’s Numbering Resource Optimization (NRO) Orders.2 Findings As of June 30, 2009: • Overall, 48.5% of all telephone numbers were assigned to end users. • The overall utilization rate for Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers (LECs) was 48.7%, down from 49.6% six months earlier.
  • Numbering Resource Utilization in the United States

    Numbering Resource Utilization in the United States

    Numbering Resource Utilization in the United States NRUF data as of December 31, 2007 Porting and Toll-Free data as of March 31, 2008 Craig Stroup and John Vu Industry Analysis and Technology Division Wireline Competition Bureau Federal Communications Commission August 2008 This report is available for reference in the FCC's Reference Information Center, Courtyard Level, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. Several private firms specialize in locating, duplicating, and distributing FCC documents. Documents may be purchased by calling Best Copy and Printing, Inc. at (202) 488-5300 or via their website at www.bcpiweb.com. This and many other useful reports can also be downloaded from the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports Internet site at www.fcc.gov/wcb/stats. Numbering Resource Utilization in the United States NRUF Data as of December 31, 2007 Porting and Toll-Free Data as of March 31, 2008 Executive Summary This is the Federal Communications Commission’s report on numbering resource utilization in the United States.1 In this report, we summarize an ongoing systematic collection of comprehensive data on the utilization of telephone numbers within the United States. The underlying information was acquired from carriers holding numbering resources and was analyzed as part of our ongoing assessment of the efficacy of numbering resource optimization measures prescribed by the Commission’s Numbering Resource Optimization (NRO) Orders.2 Findings As of December 31, 2007: • Overall, 47.1% of all telephone numbers were assigned to end users. • The overall utilization rate for Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers was 50.7%, down from 50.8% six months earlier.