Clinical Review Ovidiu A. Galescu, MD NDA 210895 Welchol

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Clinical Review Ovidiu A. Galescu, MD NDA 210895 Welchol Clinical Review Ovidiu A. Galescu, MD NDA 210895 Welchol (colesevelam hydrochloride) CLINICAL REVIEW Application Type NDA 505(b)(1) Application Number(s) 210895 Priority or Standard Standard Submit Date(s) October 30, 2017 Received Date(s) October 30, 2017 PDUFA Goal Date August 30, 2018 Division/Office DMEP/OND Reviewer Name(s) Ovidiu A. Galescu Review Completion Date August 8, 2018 Established/Proper Name colesevelam hydrochloride (Proposed) Trade Name Welchol Chewable Bar Applicant Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. Dosage Form(s) Chewable Bar Applicant Proposed Dosing 1 chewable bar (3.75 grams colesevelam hydrochloride) / day Regimen(s) Applicant Proposed Primary Hyperlipidemia and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Indication(s)/Population(s) Recommendation on Complete Response due to facilities deficiency. No clinical Regulatory Action issues identified. Recommended Reduce elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in adults Indication(s)/Population(s) and children ages 10-17 years Improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus CDER Clinical Review Template 1 Version date: September 6, 2017 for all NDAs and BLAs Reference ID: 4310681 Clinical Review Ovidiu A. Galescu, MD NDA 210895 Welchol (colesevelam hydrochloride) Table of Contents Glossary ..........................................................................................................................................9 1. Executive Summary...............................................................................................................11 1.1. Product Introduction......................................................................................................11 1.2. Conclusions on the Substantial Evidence of Effectiveness.............................................11 1.3. Benefit-Risk Assessment ................................................................................................12 ..................................................................................................................................................21 1.4. Patient Experience Data.................................................................................................22 2. Therapeutic Context..............................................................................................................22 2.1. Analysis of Condition......................................................................................................22 2.2. Analysis of Current Treatment Options .........................................................................26 3. Regulatory Background .........................................................................................................31 3.1. U.S. Regulatory Actions and Marketing History.............................................................31 3.2. Summary of Presubmission/Submission Regulatory Activity ........................................32 3.3. Foreign Regulatory Actions and Marketing History .......................................................35 4. Significant Issues from Other Review Disciplines Pertinent to Clinical Conclusions on Efficacy and Safety ................................................................................................................35 4.1. Office of Scientific Investigations (OSI) ..........................................................................35 4.2. Product Quality ..............................................................................................................35 4.3. Clinical Microbiology......................................................................................................40 4.4. Nonclinical Pharmacology/Toxicology ...........................................................................40 4.5. Clinical Pharmacology ....................................................................................................41 4.6. Devices and Companion Diagnostic Issues ....................................................................42 4.7. Consumer Study Reviews...............................................................................................42 5. Sources of Clinical Data and Review Strategy .......................................................................42 5.1. Review Strategy .............................................................................................................42 6. Labeling Recommendations ..................................................................................................44 6.1. Prescription Drug Labeling.............................................................................................44 7. Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) ................................................................46 CDER Clinical Review Template 2 Version date: September 6, 2017 for all NDAs and BLAs Reference ID: 4310681 Clinical Review Ovidiu A. Galescu, MD NDA 210895 Welchol (colesevelam hydrochloride) 8. Postmarketing Requirements and Commitments.................................................................46 9. Appendices............................................................................................................................46 9.1. Tables and Figures..........................................................................................................46 9.2. Label...............................................................................................................................47 1 Indications and Usage ...........................................................................................................49 1.1 Primary Hyperlipidemia .................................................................................................49 1.2 Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus................................................................................................49 1.3 Important Limitations of Use .........................................................................................49 2 Dosage and administration ...................................................................................................50 2.1 Primary Hyperlipidemia .................................................................................................50 2.2 Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus................................................................................................50 3 Dosage Forms and Strengths.................................................................................................51 4 Contraindications ..................................................................................................................51 5 Warnings and Precautions ....................................................................................................51 5.1 General...........................................................................................................................51 5.2 Serum Triglycerides........................................................................................................51 5.3 Vitamin K or Fat-Soluble Vitamin Deficiencies Precautions...........................................52 5.4 Gastrointestinal Disorders .............................................................................................52 5.5 Drug Interactions ...........................................................................................................52 5.6 Phenylketonurics............................................................................................................53 5.7 Macrovascular Outcomes ..............................................................................................53 6 Adverse Reactions.................................................................................................................53 6.1 Clinical Studies Experience.............................................................................................53 6.2 Post-marketing Experience ............................................................................................56 7 Drug Interactions...................................................................................................................58 8 Use in Specific Populations....................................................................................................59 8.1 Pregnancy.......................................................................................................................59 8.2 Lactation ........................................................................................................................59 CDER Clinical Review Template 3 Version date: September 6, 2017 for all NDAs and BLAs Reference ID: 4310681 Clinical Review Ovidiu A. Galescu, MD NDA 210895 Welchol (colesevelam hydrochloride) 8.4 Pediatric Use ..................................................................................................................59 8.5 Geriatric Use ..................................................................................................................60 8.6 Hepatic Impairment .......................................................................................................60 8.7 Renal Impairment ..........................................................................................................60 10 Overdosage ...........................................................................................................................61 11 Description ............................................................................................................................61 12 Clinical
Recommended publications
  • Role of Colesevelam in Combination Lipid-Lowering Therapy
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Springer - Publisher Connector Am J Cardiovasc Drugs (2013) 13:315–323 DOI 10.1007/s40256-013-0037-0 REVIEW ARTICLE Role of Colesevelam in Combination Lipid-Lowering Therapy Michael R. Jones • Oliseyenum M. Nwose Published online: 3 August 2013 Ó The Author(s) 2013. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Hyperlipidemia is associated with an increased ezetimibe, statin plus niacin, or statin plus ezetimibe) and risk of cardiovascular events; reducing low-density lipo- high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (with statins), and protein cholesterol (LDL-C), the primary target for cho- increases in apo A-I (with statins, ezetimibe, or statins plus lesterol-lowering therapy, lowers the risk for such events. niacin). Triglyceride levels remained relatively unchanged Although bile acid sequestrants were the first class of drugs when colesevelam was combined with statins, fibrates, to show a mortality benefit related to LDL-C lowering, ezetimibe, or statin plus ezetimibe, and decreased with the statins are now considered first-line pharmacological ther- triple combination of colesevelam, statin, and niacin. apy for reducing LDL-C levels because of their potency Colesevelam offset the negative glycemic effects of statins and their remarkable record of successful outcomes studies. and niacin in subjects with insulin resistance or impaired Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of patients do not glucose tolerance. Colesevelam was generally well toler- achieve LDL-C goals with statin monotherapy. In addition, ated when added to other lipid-lowering therapies in clin- because of adverse effects (primarily myopathy), some ical trials, with gastrointestinal effects such as constipation patients may be unwilling to use or unable to tolerate statin being the predominant adverse events.
    [Show full text]
  • Cholestagel®) Combination and Monotherapy for Familial Hypercholesterolaemia
    New Medicine Recommendation Colesevelam (Cholestagel®) Combination and monotherapy for familial hypercholesterolaemia Recommendation: Black - NOT recommended for use by the NHS in Lancashire. Colesevelam (Cholestagel®) is NOT recommended as combination or monotherapy for familial hypercholesterolaemia. Clinical evidence indicates that the drug is poorly tolerated and the trials were weak in significant areas such as the inclusion of small numbers of patients, only demonstrating surrogate endpoints or being conducted using nonstandard co-administered drugs. There are similar, established drugs for the treatment of the condition for which there were no head to head trials with Colesevalam therefore relative clinical efficacy cannot be directly demonstrated. Summary of supporting evidence: Primary dyslipidaemias, including familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), are lipid disorders that are genetic in origin. FH is the most common inherited lipid metabolism disorder in its heterozygous form. In the UK heterozygous FH affects 1 in 500 of the UK population. [1] Statin therapy is the first-line treatment for patients with the vast majority of dyslipidaemias. NICE CG 71 recommends the prescribing of a high-intensity statin at the maximum licensed dose or at the maximum tolerated dose to achieve a reduction in LDL cholesterol concentration of greater than 50% from baseline. [2] Colesevelam is a lipid-lowering polymer that binds bile acids in the intestine, impeding their reabsorption. [3] Colesevelam is a third-line agent, behind statins and ezetimibe. [2] The main body of evidence for the use of colesevelam in familial hypercholesterolaemia comes from the European Public Assessment Reports (EPAR). Study GTC-48-301 was a randomised, double-blind, parallel design, placebo-controlled pivotal phase III dose-response study.
    [Show full text]
  • PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX to the TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1
    Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2020) Revision 19 Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2020) Revision 19 Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names INN which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service CAS registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Your Patient Have Bile Acid Malabsorption?
    NUTRITION ISSUES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, SERIES #198 NUTRITION ISSUES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, SERIES #198 Carol Rees Parrish, MS, RDN, Series Editor Does Your Patient Have Bile Acid Malabsorption? John K. DiBaise Bile acid malabsorption is a common but underrecognized cause of chronic watery diarrhea, resulting in an incorrect diagnosis in many patients and interfering and delaying proper treatment. In this review, the synthesis, enterohepatic circulation, and function of bile acids are briefly reviewed followed by a discussion of bile acid malabsorption. Diagnostic and treatment options are also provided. INTRODUCTION n 1967, diarrhea caused by bile acids was We will first describe bile acid synthesis and first recognized and described as cholerhetic enterohepatic circulation, followed by a discussion (‘promoting bile secretion by the liver’) of disorders causing bile acid malabsorption I 1 enteropathy. Despite more than 50 years since (BAM) including their diagnosis and treatment. the initial report, bile acid diarrhea remains an underrecognized and underappreciated cause of Bile Acid Synthesis chronic diarrhea. One report found that only 6% Bile acids are produced in the liver as end products of of British gastroenterologists investigate for bile cholesterol metabolism. Bile acid synthesis occurs acid malabsorption (BAM) as part of the first-line by two pathways: the classical (neutral) pathway testing in patients with chronic diarrhea, while 61% via microsomal cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase consider the diagnosis only in selected patients (CYP7A1), or the alternative (acidic) pathway via or not at all.2 As a consequence, many patients mitochondrial sterol 27-hydroxylase (CYP27A1). are diagnosed with other causes of diarrhea or The classical pathway, which is responsible for are considered to have irritable bowel syndrome 90-95% of bile acid synthesis in humans, begins (IBS) or functional diarrhea by exclusion, thereby with 7α-hydroxylation of cholesterol catalyzed interfering with and delaying proper treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Colesevelam in Combination Lipid-Lowering Therapy
    Am J Cardiovasc Drugs DOI 10.1007/s40256-013-0037-0 REVIEW ARTICLE Role of Colesevelam in Combination Lipid-Lowering Therapy Michael R. Jones • Oliseyenum M. Nwose Ó The Author(s) 2013. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Hyperlipidemia is associated with an increased ezetimibe, statin plus niacin, or statin plus ezetimibe) and risk of cardiovascular events; reducing low-density lipo- high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (with statins), and protein cholesterol (LDL-C), the primary target for cho- increases in apo A-I (with statins, ezetimibe, or statins plus lesterol-lowering therapy, lowers the risk for such events. niacin). Triglyceride levels remained relatively unchanged Although bile acid sequestrants were the first class of drugs when colesevelam was combined with statins, fibrates, to show a mortality benefit related to LDL-C lowering, ezetimibe, or statin plus ezetimibe, and decreased with the statins are now considered first-line pharmacological ther- triple combination of colesevelam, statin, and niacin. apy for reducing LDL-C levels because of their potency Colesevelam offset the negative glycemic effects of statins and their remarkable record of successful outcomes studies. and niacin in subjects with insulin resistance or impaired Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of patients do not glucose tolerance. Colesevelam was generally well toler- achieve LDL-C goals with statin monotherapy. In addition, ated when added to other lipid-lowering therapies in clin- because of adverse effects (primarily myopathy), some ical trials, with gastrointestinal effects such as constipation patients may be unwilling to use or unable to tolerate statin being the predominant adverse events.
    [Show full text]
  • WELCHOL (Colesevelam Hydrochloride) Pancreatitis
    HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION ------------------WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS--------------------- These highlights do not include all the information needed to use • The effect of WELCHOL on cardiovascular morbidity and WELCHOL safely and effectively. See full prescribing information mortality has not been determined (5.1). for WELCHOL. • WELCHOL can increase TG, particularly when used with insulin or sulfonylureas. Marked hypertriglyceridemia can cause acute WELCHOL (colesevelam hydrochloride) pancreatitis. The effect of hypertriglyceridemia on the risk of Initial U.S. Approval: 2000 coronary artery disease is uncertain. Monitor lipids, including TG and non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) (5.2). ----------------------RECENT MAJOR CHANGES----------------------- • Bile acid sequestrants may decrease absorption of fat-soluble Dosage and Administration (2) xx/2011 vitamins. Use caution in patients susceptible to fat-soluble vitamin Warnings and Precautions (5.4) xx/2011 deficiencies (5.3). -----------------------INDICATIONS AND USAGE------------------------ • Because of its constipating effects, WELCHOL is not WELCHOL is a bile acid sequestrant indicated as an adjunct to diet recommended in patients at risk of bowel obstruction (e.g., patients and exercise to with gastroparesis, other gastrointestinal motility disorders or a • reduce elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in history of major gastrointestinal surgery) (5.4). adults with primary hyperlipidemia as monotherapy or in • WELCHOL reduces gastrointestinal
    [Show full text]
  • Bempedoic Acid
    Drug and Biologic Coverage Policy Effective Date ............................................. 7/15/2020 Next Review Date ......................................... 7/1/2021 Coverage Policy Number .................................. 2015 Bempedoic acid Table of Contents Related Coverage Resources Coverage Policy ................................................... 1 Genetic Testing of Heritable Disorders FDA Approved Indications ................................... 4 Recommended Dosing ........................................ 4 General Background ............................................ 4 Coding/Billing Information .................................... 7 References .......................................................... 7 INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE The following Coverage Policy applies to health benefit plans administered by Cigna Companies. Certain Cigna Companies and/or lines of business only provide utilization review services to clients and do not make coverage determinations. References to standard benefit plan language and coverage determinations do not apply to those clients. Coverage Policies are intended to provide guidance in interpreting certain standard benefit plans administered by Cigna Companies. Please note, the terms of a customer’s particular benefit plan document [Group Service Agreement, Evidence of Coverage, Certificate of Coverage, Summary Plan Description (SPD) or similar plan document] may differ significantly from the standard benefit plans upon which these Coverage Policies are based. For example, a customer’s benefit
    [Show full text]
  • MPS 2742 To: All Community Pharmacists 15 December 2020 Dear Colleague
    MPS 2742 Pharmaceutical Services, 2 Franklin Street, Belfast BT2 8DQ Telephone No. 028 95 36 0333 To: All Community Pharmacists 15th December 2020 Dear colleague Re: Bile acid sequestrants- colestyramine powder for oral suspension 4g (Questran and Questran Light), colesevelam (Cholestagel) and colestipol (Colestid) Description of product affected Colestyramine is licensed for use in the following indications1,2: Primary prevention of coronary heart disease in men between 35 and 59 years of age and with primary hypercholesterolaemia who have not responded to diet and other appropriate measures. Reduction of plasma cholesterol in hypercholesterolaemia, particularly in those patients who have been diagnosed as Fredrickson's Type II (high plasma cholesterol with normal or slightly elevated triglycerides). Relief of pruritus associated with partial biliary obstruction and primary biliary cirrhosis. Relief of diarrhoea associated with ileal resection, Crohn's disease, vagotomy and diabetic vagal neuropathy. Management of radiation-induced diarrhoea The dose used varies between 4g and 36g daily according to the indication.1,2 MPS 2742 Pharmaceutical Services, 2 Franklin Street, Belfast BT2 8DQ Telephone No. 028 95 36 0333 For relief of diarrhoea, it is common practice to use colestyramine off-label to treat “bile acid diarrhoea” where considered clinically appropriate. This condition may be diagnosed using a radionucleotide SeHCAT test.3 Colestyramine is also used to help reduce the volume of jejunal and ileostomy outputs as a consequence
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Necessity Criteria for Welchol (Colesevelam)
    Medical Necessity Criteria for Welchol (colesevelam) Background – The antilipidemics II drug class includes three types of medications that affect cholesterol levels: the fibric acid derivatives (gemfibrozil and fenofibrate), the bile acid sequestrants (cholestyramine, colesevelam, and colestipol), and prescription omega-3 fatty acids (Lovaza, formerly Omacor). After evaluating the relative clinical and cost effectiveness of the bile acid subclass, the DoD P&T Committee recommended that Welchol (colesevelam) be designated as non-formulary. This recommendation has been approved by the Director, TMA. Effective Date: 13 July 2011 Patients currently using Welchol (colesevelam) may wish to ask their doctor to consider a formulary alternative. Notes: * Active duty cost share always $0 in all points of service for all three tiers; active duty service members may not fill prescriptions for a non-formulary medication unless it is determined to be medically necessary. ** MTFs will be able to fill non-formulary requests for non-formulary medications only if both of the following conditions are met: 1) a MTF provider writes the prescription, and 2) medical necessity is established for the non-formulary medication. MTFs may (but are not required to) fill a prescription for a non-formulary medication written by a non-MTF provider to whom the patient was referred, as long as medical necessity has been established. Medical Necessity Criteria for Welchol (colesevelam)® 1. The formulary medication is contraindicated (e.g., due to hypersensitivity). 2. The patient has experienced or is likely to experience significant adverse effects with the formulary medication. 3. The formulary medication resulted in therapeutic failure. 4. The patient has a history of GI obstruction and requires treatment with a bile acid sequestrant.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 12/ 35 74Al
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date 22 March 2012 (22.03.2012) 2 12/ 35 74 Al (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A61K 9/16 (2006.01) A61K 9/51 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, A61K 9/14 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, (21) International Application Number: DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, PCT/EP201 1/065959 HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, (22) International Filing Date: KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, 14 September 201 1 (14.09.201 1) ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, (25) Filing Language: English RW, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, (26) Publication Language: English TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: 61/382,653 14 September 2010 (14.09.2010) US (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, NANOLOGICA AB [SE/SE]; P.O Box 8182, S-104 20 ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, Stockholm (SE).
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacotherapeutic Report on Colesevelam (Cholestagel®) in Combination with Ezetimibe, with Or Without a Statin, in Adult Pati
    Pharmacotherapeutic report on colesevelam (Cholestagel®) in combination with ezetimibe, with or without a statin, in adult patients with primary hypercholesterolemia, including patients with familial hypercholesterolemia Medicine. Colesevelam (as hydrochloride). Tablet, 625 mg, film-coated. Summary of the therapeutic value Intended effects. Patients with primary hypercholesterolemia who received colesevelam and ezetimibe had an additional mean 0.5 mmol/l (11%) reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels compared with patients receiving ezetimibe monotherapy. The total 32% reduction in LDL-C with combination therapy is comparable with the reduction that can be expected with statin monotherapy. Combination treatment with colesevelam and ezetimibe is intended for patients who are not adequately controlled with ezetimibe monotherapy and who do not tolerate statins or for whom statins are contraindicated. The effect of combination therapy has not been evaluated among the intended target population. Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and an LDL-C >2.5 mmol/l who received colesevelam as an add-on therapy, alongside a maximally-tolerated and stable regimen of a statin and ezetimibe, had an additional mean 0.6 mmol/l (12%) reduction in LDL-C levels compared with patients receiving combination therapy with a statin and ezetimibe. In total, 79% of the patients received the maximal dose of a statin. No data are available on combination therapy with cholestyramine (another bile-acid sequestrant). It was therefore impossible to compare the effects of the combination therapy with colesevelam with those of combination therapy with cholestyramine. Unintended effects. The incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events was higher with combination therapy. No unexpected adverse events occurred.
    [Show full text]
  • Colese Bile Acid Malabsorption: Colesevelam
    pat hways Bile acid malabsorption: colesevelam Evidence summary Published: 29 October 2013 nice.org.uk/guidance/esuom22 Key points from the evidence The content of this evidence summary was up-to-date in October 2013. See summaries of product characteristics (SPCs), British national formulary (BNF) or the MHRA or NICE websites for up-to-date information. Summary The use of colesevelam for bile acid malabsorption is reported in 2 small case series (n=45 and n=5), which found that colesevelam improved diarrhoea and gastrointestinal symptoms in people with this condition. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) found no improvement in outcomes with colesevelam in 24 women with diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, 4 of whom had evidence of bile acid malabsorption. However, the study may have been underpowered to detect any differences between the groups. Colesevelam appears to be well tolerated; the most frequent adverse effects are flatulence and constipation. Regulatory status: off-label © NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 1 of conditions#notice-of-rights). 24 Bile acid malabsorption: colesevelam (ESUOM22) Effectiveness Safety In an RCT in 24 women with According to the summary of product diarrhoea-predominant irritable characteristics, the adverse effects of bowel syndrome, there was no colesevelam include flatulence and constipation, statistically significant difference in which affect at least 1 in 10 people who take it. gastric, small bowel and overall Other adverse effects include headache, colonic transit, or ascending colonic vomiting, diarrhoea, dyspepsia, abdominal pain, emptying with colesevelam compared abnormal stools, nausea and abdominal with placebo.
    [Show full text]