DOCSLIB.ORG

Cultural Heritage

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PORTISHEAD BRANCH LI NE PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMAT I O N R E P O R T V O L U M E 2 CHAPTER 8 Cultural Heritage Table of Contents Section Page 8 Cultural Heritage ........................................................................................................... 8-1 8.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 8-1 8.2 Legal and Policy Framework ...................................................................................... 8-1 8.3 Methodology.............................................................................................................. 8-4 8.4 Baseline, Future Conditions and Value of Resource ................................................ 8-15 8.5 Measures Adopted as Part of the DCO Scheme ...................................................... 8-25 8.6 Assessment of Effects .............................................................................................. 8-25 8.7 Mitigation and Residual Effects ............................................................................... 8-37 8.8 Cumulative Effects ................................................................................................... 8-39 8.9 Limitations Encountered in Compiling the PEI Report............................................. 8-41 8.10 Summary .................................................................................................................. 8-42 8.11 References ............................................................................................................... 8-45 8.12 Abbreviations ........................................................................................................... 8-45 Tables Table 8-1: Summary of relevant NPSNN advice on the historic environment Table 8-2: Summary of Local Policy Table 8-3: Summary of consultation responses Table 8-4: Assessing the value of cultural heritage receptors Table 8-5: Definition of assessment criteria for the magnitude of impact Table 8-6: Determination of the significance of effect Table 8-7: Potential Impacts, Mitigation and Residual Impacts for the DCO Scheme on Cultural Heritage Assets Figures See Volume 3 Book of Figures Figure 8-1: Cultural heritage Appendices See Volume 4 Appendices Appendix 8.1: Cultural Heritage Gazetteer Appendix 8.2: Scheme inter-visibility PORTISHEAD BRANCH LINE PRELIMINARY CHAPTER 8 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION REPORT, VOLUME 2 CULTURAL HERITAGE CHAPTER 8 8 Cultural Heritage 8.1 Introduction The Portishead Branch Line (MetroWest Phase 1) DCO Scheme (“the DCO Scheme”) has the potential to give rise to likely significant effects on cultural heritage. This Chapter: • describes the relevant legal and policy framework which informs the undertaking of the assessment; • describes the methodology used for the identification and assessment of likely significant cultural heritage effects in the Preliminary Environmental Information Report ("PEI Report"); • describes the cultural heritage baseline having regard to existing information and information presented in Appendix 8.1 in the PEI Report Volume 4 Appendices; • describes the measures that have been adopted as part of the DCO Scheme; • identifies and assesses the likely significant effects that could result from the DCO Scheme during the construction, operation and decommissioning phases; • considers mitigation of likely significant effects and assesses those residual effects that will result; • considers the cumulative effects of other developments in combination with the DCO Scheme on cultural heritage assets; • identifies the limitations encountered in compiling the PEI Report; and • provides a summary of the residual effects for the mitigated DCO Scheme. The cultural heritage resource comprises built heritage (including extant railway architecture of all types), designated areas (including Conservation Areas "CA", Scheduled Monuments "SM", and Registered Parks and Gardens "RP&G"), extant and buried archaeology, and Historic Landscape Characters ("HLC"). This report considers the direct and indirect impacts of the DCO Scheme on statutory and non-statutory designations in addition to non-designated cultural heritage assets during construction and the operation phases. This chapter should be read in conjunction with Chapter 4 Description of the Proposed Works and Chapter 12 Landscape and Visual Impacts which also discusses the landscape setting and views from heritage features. Supporting information on specific heritage features is provided in the gazetteer in Appendix 8.1 and photographs showing the setting of heritage features are provided in Appendix 8.2. Figure 8-1 Sheets 1 to 5 in the PEI Report Volume 3 Book of Figures show the location of heritage features. 8.2 Legal and Policy Framework EU and National Legislation The main legal framework governing the conservation of cultural heritage assets is provided by the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979 (as amended) and the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. 8-1 CHAPTER 8 PORTISHEAD BRANCH LINE PRELIMINARY CULTURAL HERITAGE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION REPORT, VOLUME 2 The Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979 provides for the protection of scheduled monuments. The Infrastructure Planning (Decisions) Regulations 2010 states that: “(1) When deciding an application which affects a listed building or its setting, the [Secretary of State] must have regard to the desirability of preserving the listed building or its setting or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses. (2) When deciding an application relating to a conservation area, the [Secretary of State] must have regard to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of that area. (3) When deciding an application for development consent which affects or is likely to affect a scheduled monument or its setting, the [Secretary of State] must have regard to the desirability of preserving the scheduled monument or its setting.” The Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 requires local authorities to designate areas of special architectural or historic interest as Conservation Areas with the aim of preserving and enhancing their character and appearance. Historic England (formerly English Heritage) may need to be consulted with regard to proposed works within a Conservation Area and section 72(1) requires Local Authorities to pay particular attention to Conservation Areas in the planning process. This Act states that when deciding a planning application the decision maker must have special regard to preserving the character of a Conservation Area and listed buildings and their settings. National Policy The National Policy Statement for National Networks ("NPSNN") advises on the assessment of effects of nationally significant infrastructure projects ("NSIP") on the historic environment at paragraphs 5.120 - 5.142. This includes an introduction to heritage issues, the requirements on the applicant, decision-making by the Secretary of State and recording. Table 8-1 below identifies those policies of direct relevance to this assessment and the location where they are considered in this PEI Report. Table 8-1: Summary of relevant NPSNN advice on the historic environment Summary of NPS provision Consideration within the PEI Report Paragraph 5.126 states that for development This chapter presents the findings to date. subject to environmental impact assessment (EIA) the Applicant should undertake an assessment of likely significant heritage impacts. Paragraph 5.127 requires the Applicant to describe The HER for NSDC and BCC were consulted and are the significance of heritage assets affected, summarised in Section 8.4 and listed in the gazetteer in including their setting. The relevant Historic Appendix 8.1 in the PEI Report Volume 4 Appendices. Environment Record (“HER”) should be consulted. The location of sites is shown on Figure 8-1 Sheets 1 to Where the site has potential to include heritage 5 in the PEI Report Volume 3 Book of Figures. assets, the applicant should undertake a desk- Photographs showing the setting of these assets are based assessment and where appropriate field provided in Appendix 8.2 in the PEI Report Volume 4 evaluation. Appendices. This chapter presents the results of a desk- based assessment supported by field walkover surveys. The National Planning Policy Framework ("NPPF") Section 12 on Conserving and Enhancing the Historic Environment describes the approach to be used by local planning authorities to determine planning applications in relation to cultural heritage and listed building consent applications. This guidance applies both to designated heritage assets, such as Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas and also to undesignated, but potentially significant, heritage assets such as buried archaeological remains and other historic 8-2 PORTISHEAD BRANCH LINE PRELIMINARY CHAPTER 8 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION REPORT, VOLUME 2 CULTURAL HERITAGE structures, including those that make a positive contribution to the character of a Conservation Area. Whilst the NPPF only applies to planning applications and not applications for development consent, it may be an important and relevant consideration as part of the DCO application. Local Policy The local planning framework comprises a number of key adopted documents which form the statutory development plan for each authority, against which proposals seeking planning
Recommended publications
  • 4 Durdham Park BRISTOL • BS6 6XA 4 Durdham Park BRISTOL • BS6 6XA

    4 Durdham Park BRISTOL • BS6 6XA 4 Durdham Park BRISTOL • BS6 6XA

    4 Durdham Park BRISTOL • BS6 6XA 4 Durdham Park BRISTOL • BS6 6XA Immaculate family home with sunny gardens, garage and parking Bay fronted sitting room • Dining room Kitchen/Breakfast room • Master suite with dresser • 4/5 guest bedrooms • Family Bathroom • Guest Bathroom • Sun Terrace Gardens to front and rear • Double Garage • Off street parking Clifton 1.3 miles • Whiteladies Road 0.3 miles Park Street 1.5 miles • Bristol Temple Meads 3.0 miles Bristol International Airport 10.3 miles. (All distances are approximate) These particulars are intended only as a guide and must not be relied upon as statements of fact. Your attention is drawn to the Important Notice on the last page of the text. Situation The property is a short distance away from Redland Green School. Bristol provides a good selection of schools including Clifton College, Clifton High School, QEH, Bristol Grammar School, Badminton School for Girls and Redland Girls School. Other schools in the surrounding area include The Downs School at Wraxall. Nearby shops are in Henleaze (about 1.0 miles), Whiteladies Road (about 0.3 miles) and Clifton village (about 1.3 miles) which provide a variety of boutique shops, banks, restaurants, post offi ces, public houses and art galleries. The city centre is located approximately 1.9 miles away and provides extensive shopping facilities including Cabot Circus Shopping Centre, 2.1 miles and Cribbs Causeway is 4 miles. Access to the M4 is via the M32 motorway, as well as J18 of the M5. Bristol Temple Meads provides a fast train service to London Paddington which is approximately 90 minutes.
  • Clifton & Hotwells Character Appraisal

    Clifton & Hotwells Character Appraisal

    Conservation Area 5 Clifton & Hotwells Character Appraisal & Management Proposals June 2010 www.bristol.gov.uk/conservation Prepared by: With special thanks to: City Design Group Clifton and Hotwells Improvement Society Bristol City Council Brunel House St. Georges Road Bristol BS1 5UY www.bristol.gov.uk/conservation June 2010 CLIFTON & HOTWELLS CONTENTSCharacter Appraisal 1. INTRODUCTION P. 1 2. PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT P. 1 3. LOCATION & SETTING P. 2 4. SUMMARY OF CHARACTER & SPECIAL INTEREST P. 4 5. HisTORIC DEVELOPMENT & ARCHAEOLOGY P. 5 6. SPATIAL ANALYSIS 6.1 Streets & Spaces P. 14 6.2 Views P. 17 6.3 Landmark Buildings P. 21 7. CHARACTER ANALYSIS 7.1 Overview & Character Areas P. 24 7.1.1 Character Area 1: Pembroke Road P. 27 7.1.2 Character Area 2: The Zoo & College P. 31 7.1.3 Character Area 3: The Promenade P. 34 7.1.4 Character Area 4: Clifton Park P. 37 7.1.5 Character Area 5: Victoria Square & Queens Road P. 41 7.1.6 Character Area 6: Clifton Green P. 44 7.1.7 Character Area 7: Clifton Wood Slopes P. 48 7.1.8 Character Area 8: Clifton Spa Terraces P. 50 7.1.9 Character Area 9: Hotwells P. 55 7.2 Architectural Details P. 58 7.3 Townscape Details P. 62 7.4 Materials P. 67 7.5 Building Types P. 68 7.9 Landscape & Trees P. 70 8. TYPICAL LAND USE & SUMMARY OF ISSUES 8.1 Overview P. 73 8.2 Residential P. 73 8.3 Institutions & Churches P. 74 8.4 Open Spaces & Community Gardens P.
  • Bristol, Avon Valleys and Ridges (NCA 118)

    Bristol, Avon Valleys and Ridges (NCA 118)

    NELMS target statement for Bristol, Avon Valleys and Ridges (NCA 118) Your application is scored and a decision made on the points awarded. Both top priorities and lower priorities score points but you should select at least one top priority. Scoring is carried out by... Choosing priorities To apply you should choose at least one of the top priorities, and you can choose lower priorities - this may help with your application. Top priorities Priority group Priority type Biodiversity Priority habitats Priority species Water Water quality Flood and coastal risk management Historic environment Designated historic and archaeological features Undesignated historic and archaeological features of high significance Woodland priorities Woodland management Woodland planting Landscape Climate Change Multiple environmental benefits Lower priorities Priority group Priority type Lower priorities Water quality Archaeological and historic features Woodland Biodiversity - top priorities Priority habitats You should carry out land management practices and capital works that maintains, restores and creates priority habitats. Maintain priority habitat such as: • Coastal and floodplain grazing marsh • Lowland meadows • Lowland calcareous grassland Reedbeds Traditional orchard • Lowland dry acid grassland Wood Pasture and Parkland Restore priority habitats (especially proposals which make existing sites bigger or help join up habitat networks) such as: ● Coastal and floodplain grazing marsh • Lowland meadows • Lowland calcareous grassland Reedbeds Traditional
  • Feuding Gentry and an Affray on College Green, Bristol, in 1579 by J

    Feuding Gentry and an Affray on College Green, Bristol, in 1579 by J

    From the Transactions of the Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society Feuding Gentry and an Affray on College Green, Bristol, in 1579 by J. H. Bettey 2004, Vol. 122, 153-159 © The Society and the Author(s) Trans. Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society 122 (2004), 153–9 Feuding Gentry and an Affray on College Green, Bristol, in 1579 By JOSEPH BETTEY During the 1570s two wealthy, landed gentlemen engaged in a struggle for primacy in Bristol. They were Hugh Smyth, who possessed Ashton Court together with widespread estates in Somerset and south Gloucestershire, and John Young, owner of properties in Somerset, Wiltshire and Dorset. Their rivalry was to involve several other gentry families in the district, and culminated in a violent confrontation between their armed retainers on College Green in March 1579. The subsequent inquiry into the incident in the Court of Star Chamber provides much detail about the parties involved, as well as evidence about the status and use of College Green, and about the ancient chapel of St. Jordan and the open-air pulpit which stood on the Green. Although it was in existence for several centuries and was a focus of devotion in Bristol, little documentary evidence survives concerning St. Jordan and his chapel. The following account provides information about the chapel during the 16th century. Hugh Smyth’s wealth, his estates on the southern edge of Bristol, and his family connection with the city gave him a powerful claim to prominence. His father, John Smyth, had made a large fortune by trade through the port of Bristol and had invested his wealth in property in the city and the surrounding region, including the purchase of the Ashton Court estate in 1545.
  • Annual Review 2016.Pdf

    Annual Review 2016.Pdf

    Annual Review 2015/16 Join us for our Annual General Meeting Avon Wildlife Trust’s Annual General Meeting (AGM) is on 1 November 2016 at the Guildhall in Bath. Members are invited to the formal business meeting from 7.30pm. Prior to the AGM there will be an exhibition space and donations bar from 5.30pm with presentations starting at 6.30pm. Presentations are from leading environmentalist Chris Baines on Bath’s rivers and wildlife; CEO of Buglife Matt Shardlow, on our B-Lines partnership; and CEO of Avon Wildlife Trust Ian Barrett, on our new vision for Bath and the surrounding countryside. 1. To receive the Annual Report of the Board of Trustees and Audited Annual Accounts, together with the Auditors’ report for the year ended 31 March 2016. 2. To elect Trustees (for further details please see the website or contact the office). Nuthatch ndy Morffew Welcome a 3. To re-appoint Mr Simon King as President of the Trust (recommended by the Board of Trustees). Welcome to your review of the year from April 2015 – March 2016. Thanks to vital support from By order of the Board of Trustees our members, this has been one of the busiest ever years at the Trust! We celebrated our 35th Note: under the Companies Act 2006 the serving anniversary as well as Bristol’s Green Capital year, and it was also the first year of putting our new Auditors, Messrs Hollingdale Pooley, are deemed re-appointed and continue in office. five-year plan into action: Our Vision 2015- 2020* Please visit avonwildlifetrust.org.uk/AGM2016 In this first year of our vision, we have made good progress.
  • Clifton Down History Trail

    Clifton Down History Trail

    Trail 2 - v1_Layout 1 03/11/2011 10:22 Page 1 The Downs History Trails No 2 A little background history START at Sion Hill look-out point Clifton and Durdham Downs: how has such an extensive and dramatic landscape that is so close to the centre of a great city survived open and free from development Start at Sion Hill look-out point will not refuse riding behind a man… and for so long? above the Avon Gorge Hotel; take numbers of what they call double horses For many centuries the tenants or commoners of the two medieval manors of Clifton a seat looking up the hill. are constantly kept for that purpose.” and Henbury had the right to graze their animals here. But by the mid-nineteenth Three ‘double horses’ are depicted. Clifton Down century grazing was declining as the city expanded and development pushed in at This seemingly bleak view On the top of the hill is the defunct the edges of the common land. Mines and quarries also scarred the Downs as well as 1A was drawn in September windmill, which was to become the the Avon Gorge. 1789 from an upper window of a newly Observatory thirty years later. Below the built lodging house in Sion Row, only just In 1856 the Society of Merchant Venturers, owners of Clifton Down since the late tower is a ruined building, just possibly “... for ever hereafter open out of your sight around the rising bend seventeenth century, promised “to maintain the free and uninterrupted use of the the remains of St Vincent’s Chapel which of Sion Hill.
  • Character Areas 4

    Character Areas 4

    Bristol Central Area Context Study Informing change Character areas 4 Bristol Central Area September 2013 Context Study - back to contents City Design Group 37 Character areas Criteria for character areas The character of each area refers to the predominant physical characteristics within each area. The The character areas have been defined using English boundaries are an attempt to define where these Heritage guidance provided in ‘Understanding Place: physical characteristics notably change, although there Historic Area Assessments: Principles and Practice’ will be design influences within neighbouring areas. (2010), although the boundaries have been adjusted to Therefore adjoining character should be considered in fit with existing Conservation Area or Neighbourhood any response to context. boundaries where practical. The key challenges and opportunities for each Detailed description of character areas has been character area are given at the end of each character provided where they intersect with the major areas of description section. These challenges are not an change as identified by the Bristol Central Area Plan. exhaustive list and are presented as the significant Summary pages have been provided for the remaining issues and potential opportunities as identified by the character areas including those within the Temple context study. Quarter Enterprise Zone (section 5). Further information about the Enterprise Zone is provided in the Temple Quarter Heritage Assessment and Temple Quarter Spatial Framework documents. Following the accepted guidelines each character area is defined by the aspects in 1.1 and primarily Topography, urban structure, scale and massing, building ages and material palette. This is in accordance with the emerging Development Management policies on local character and distinctiveness.
  • The Rise of a Gentry Family: the Smyth's of Ashton Court, C. 1500

    The Rise of a Gentry Family: the Smyth's of Ashton Court, C. 1500

    BRISTOL BRANCH OF THE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION LOCAL HISTORY PAMPHLETS THE RISE OF A GENTRY FAMILY STILL IN PRINT 3. The Theatre Royal: first seventy years. Kathleen Barker. 20p 8. The Steamship Great Western by Grahame Farr. 30p 13. The Port of Bristol in the Middle Ages by J. W. Sherborne. 25p THE SMYTHS OF ASHTON COURT 15. The Bristol Madrigal Society by Herbert Byard. 15p 16. Ei�hteenth Century Views of Bristol by Peter Marcy. 15p 18. The Industrial Archaeology of Bristol by R. A. Buchanan. J Sp 23. Prehistoric Bristol by L. V. Grinsell. 20p I 25. John Whitson and the Merchant Community of Bristol by Patrick McGrath. 20p 26. Nineteenth Century Engineers in the Port of Bristol by R. A. Buchanan. 20p c. 1500 1642 21. Bristol Shipbur'ldingin the Nineteenth Century by Grahame Farr. 25p 28. Bristol in the Middle Ages by David Walker. 25p 29. Bristol Corporation of the Poor 1699-1898 by E. E. Butcher. 25p 30. The Bristol Mint by L. V. Grinsell. 30p 31. The Marian Martyrs by K. G. Powell. 30p 32. Bristol Trades Council 1873-1973 by David Large and Robert Whitfield. 30p 33. Entertainment in the Nineties by Kathleen Barker. 30p 34. The Bristol Riots by Susan Thomas. 35p 35. Public Health in mid-Victorian Bristol by David Large and Frances Round. 35p by H. BETTEY 36. The Establishment of the Bristol Police Force by R. Walters. J. 40p 37. Bristol and the Abolition of Slavery by Peter Marshall. 40p 38. 1747-1789 by Jonathan Press. I The Merchant Seamen of Bristol 50p 39.
  • Index to Bristol Naturalists' Society Proceedings

    Index to Bristol Naturalists' Society Proceedings

    Index to Bristol Naturalists' Society Proceedings and Nature in Avon from 1863 to 2015 Articles from 1863 to 1993 are in the "Proceedings" section of the Biodiversity Library, those from 1994 onwards are in the "Nature in Avon" section. Date Author Subject 1862 BNS Inaugurated 1863 Beddoe, Dr J The Maori race 1863 Groome CO Cranium of New Zealanders 1863 Martin F Marine zoology of Clevedon 1863 Stoddart WW Tea and its adulteration 1864 Carpenter WL Water glass in decorations 1864 Collens E Improvement of Mohr's burette 1864 Coomber T Wells and water quality 1864 Davies D Inhabitants of the British Isles 1864 Fripp H The glow-worm 1864 Groome CO Nidification of British Birds 1 1864 Groome CO Nidification of British Birds 2 1864 Herspath Dr Solar power, radiation, emanation 1864 Martyn Dr Sea cucumber 1864 Moore C Geological ramble to Patchway 1864 Ponton TG Land & freshwater molluscs of Bristol 1864 Stoddart WW Naturalist's walk near Bristol 1864 Swayne SH Anthropoid Apes 1865 Barber Wings of insects 1865 Carpenter WL Eozoon Canadense fossil 1865 Carpenter WL Gun cotton 1865 Cossham H Pennant formation of the Bristol Coalfield 1865 Fripp H Eye in Cephalopod Molluscs 1865 Fripp HE Sight in Fishes 1865 Harding Ferns of New Zealand 1865 Jordan HK Rock-boring molluscs 1865 Leipner Red sea weed 1865 Lobb BN First experience in Aquaria 1865 Noble A Utilisation of sewage 1865 Owen H Periopthalmus papilio 1865 Ponton TG The foot of bi-valve molluscs 1865 Ravis C Raised beaches of Weston-super-mare 1865 Sanders W Old red sandstone beds 1865 Stoddart WW Fossil land and freshwater molluscs 1865 Yabbicom Starch 1866 Stoddart WW Devonian palaeontology 1866 Carpenter WL Artificial formation of flint 1866 Carpenter WL Pharoah's Serpents' Eggs 1866 Fripp HE Sight in Fishes 1866 Smith GN Bone-cave near Tenby 1866 Stoddart WW Ammonites planorbis 1866 Stoddart WW Involutina liassica fossil 1866 Ravis CF Amber 1866 Sec.
  • Spring 2013 Bristolcivicsociety.Org.Uk

    Spring 2013 Bristolcivicsociety.Org.Uk

    ETTER RISTOL B The Bristol Civic Society magazine B Issue 02 Spring 2013 bristolcivicsociety.org.uk including Annual Review and AGM details An independent force for a better Bristol Contents Join us 2 FEATURES Bristol Civic Society 4 Cumberland Piazza – Ray Smith - an independent force for a better Bristol 5 Temple Meads transport hub – Dave Cave - is a registered charity. 8 Ready, willing and able? – Christopher Brown 9 Unbuilt Bristol – Eugene Byrne A large part of our income, 10 Know your heritage at risk – Pete Insole which comes from membership subscriptions, 12 Local List – Bob Jones is spent on producing this magazine. 13 New Hope for Old Market – Leighton Deburca If you are not already a BCS member and would like 14 Census and Sensibility – Eugene Byrne to support us and have Better Bristol magazine 16 Saving Ashton Court Mansion – Peter Weeks delivered to your address, please consider joining us. 17 Bristol’s listed gardens - Ros Delany 18 The Architecture Centre - Christine Davies Individual membership for the first year is £10 if you set up a standing order and £20 annually thereafter. BRISTOL CIVIC SOCIETY ANNUAL REVIEW Contact Maureen Pitman, Membership Secertary 19 Chair’s Statement • [email protected] & AGM Invitation - Heather Leeson 0117 974 3637 20 Public Spaces Group 2012 Reviews - Alan Morris bristolcivicsociety.org.uk/ 21 Historical Group membership/membership form 2012 Review - Alan Morris 21 Heritage Group - Mariateresa Bucciante 22 Planning Application Group 2012 Review - John Payne 22 Notes
  • Bournemouth Bristol

    Bournemouth Bristol

    SchoolFind O Presentationut More About BournemouthBristol 2015 EF Bristol Essential info Custom House Queen Square Bristol, BS1 4JQ United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 117 9303 500 Emergency Number: +44 (0) 7798 631207 2010 • Opened in March with 3 students EF Bristol • Pioneers of the new EF iPad learning technology The Story So Far 2011 • Junior courses introduced • More than 7000 students travelled 2012 • Passed ISI inspection 2013 • Reception renovation and introduction of the iLounge • Passed British Council Accreditation for maximum term – Next inspection 2017 • Passed ISI inspection 2014 • 95% recommendation rate • Exceeds Expectations in ISI inspection EF Bristol Staff Bristol Bristol is a vibrant and growing cosmopolitan city. Once a centre for heavy industry, over the last few decades the city has reinvented itself as a hub of culture and creativity. It is the eighth largest city in the UK and the largest city in the south west of England Population: 450,000 Universities: 2 – University of Bristol and UWE Bristol airport: Located just 8 miles from the city centre. The airport caters for 4 million passengers a year with over 100 direct destinations across Europe and hundreds of onward connections across the globe. Location London just 1 hour and 40 minute by train City surrounded by harbourside and countryside Historic city of Bath just 15 minutes on train Cotswolds just 30 minutes on train Cardiff just 50 minutes on train Nearest beach – Weston Super Mare only 10 miles away Oxford & Stonehenge both 1 hour and 30 minutes away Climate Bristol is one of the warmest cities in the UK, with a mean annual temperature of 10.2–12 °C (50.4–53.6 °F).
  • Puritanism and Traditionalism: Cultural and Political Division in Bath, 1620-1662

    Puritanism and Traditionalism: Cultural and Political Division in Bath, 1620-1662

    PURITANISM AND TRADITIONALISM: CULTURAL AND POLITICAL DIVISION IN BATH, 1620-1662 John Wroughton In late July 1642, the citizens of Bath and North-East Somerset took to the streets of the city to engage in a bitter war of words at least three weeks before the King signified the official start of the Civil War by raising his standard in Nottingham. The occasion for this open expression of deep division within the local community was a meeting of the county assizes, attended by dignatories from all over Somerset, and the arrival of two powerful recruitment parties in anticipation of the impending conflict - on the one hand the Marquis of Hertford for the King and on the other the newly-appointed 'County Committee' for parliament. The result of their opposing efforts in propaganda was decisively in favour of parliament. A great popular uprising of 12,000 local people, staged on the Mendips, quickly dispatched the royalist Marquis of Hertford from the county with his meagre band of 900 supporters. This heart-felt commitment to the parliamentary cause, which was not shared with any great conviction in other parts of Somerset, was to continue unabated throughout the ensuing war as local inhabitants willingly gave assistance to Sir William Waller at the battle of Lansdown in 1643; cleverly undermined the morale of the royalist garrison under Sir Thomas Bridges between 1643 and 1645; and triumphantly mounted another massive rally on the Mendips in support of the New Model Army under Sir Thomas Fairfax in 1645. 1 What caused ordinary members of this particular community to behave in a way which was not typical of the rest of the country and to display such consistency, stamina and depth of political feeling? Contrary to a commonly-held opinion, first advocated by the Earl of Clarendon, the Mendip rebellion was not caused by class division.