DOCSLIB.ORG

The Case Against Blackwater CCR Returns to Supreme Court Over

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Case Against Blackwater CCR Returns to Supreme Court Over Winter 2007 Newsletter CCR Returns to Supreme Court over Guantánamo On December 5, CCR will return to the Supreme Court on behalf of the men at Guantánamo with the cases Al Odah v. U.S. and Boumediene v. Bush. These cases are the first to directly challenge the constitutionality of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 and its strip- ping of habeas corpus jurisdiction from federal courts. Al Odah v. United States, filed jointly by CCR and co-counsel law firms, consists of eleven habeas petitions, including many of the first ones filed after CCR’s 2004 victory in Rasul v. Bush. Boumediene v. Bush is on behalf of six Bosnian-Algerian humanitarian workers seized by the U.S. military continued on page 4 Holding Private Security Contractors Inside 2 From the Accountable: The Case Against Blackwater Executive Director 2 Victory Against CACI On October 11, the Center of this incident has put an employees, encouraging for Constitutional Rights international spotlight on them to act in the com- 3 Filing Charges filed a civil case against the how private contractors in pany’s financial interests Against Rumsfeld notorious private security Iraq have operated outside at the expense of innocent 3 CCR Welcomes New contractor Blackwater USA of the law through the use human life.” The case, Estate Board Members for the killing of innocent of mercenaries who disre- of Himoud Saed Atban, et al. Iraqi civilians. The case gard all legal constraints. v. Blackwater USA, et al., was 4 Guantánamo was brought in cooperation CCR is working to ensure filed on behalf of an Iraqi 6 Maher Arar with Burke O’Neil LLC and that these companies are citizen who was injured Akeel & Valentine, P.C. not shielded from account- by Blackwater employees 7 Pakistan and the U.S. ability for their actions and during the incident and the 7 Victory for the LA 8 Blackwater USA is a private to show that government families of three deceased military contractor whose contracts are not a license men. 8 CCR’s New Website heavily armed personnel for impunity. 9 New Orleans opened fire on innocent In the lawsuit, CCR alleges Iraqi civilians in Baghdad’s CCR’s lawsuit asserts that that Blackwater violated 10 New Board Members crowded Nisoor Square on Blackwater violated U.S. the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) 11 Donor Spotlight September 16, 2007, killing law and “fostered a culture in committing extrajudicial 17 civilians. Media coverage of lawlessness amongst its continued on page 2 CCR 666 Broadway, 7th floor, New York, NY 10012 • Phone (212) 614-6489 • Fax (212) 614-6422 Email [email protected] • www.CCRjustice.org 2 From the Executive Director Blackwater (continued from cover) This is a crucial and exciting killing and war crimes, and that Blackwater should be time in CCR’s history and liable for torts such as assault and battery; wrongful death; in the U.S. judicial system. intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress; The Supreme Court of the and negligent hiring, training and supervision. The suit United States will be hear- seeks compensatory damages for death; physical, mental, ing oral arguments in CCR’s and economic injuries; and punitive damages. landmark cases Al Odah v. U.S. and Boumediene v. Bush. It was revealed in late October that the U.S. State Depart- This case will demand the ment had promised immunity to the Blackwater guards in- detainees’ right to know volved in the shooting in exchange for telling their stories why they are being held. to department investigators. The State Department’s action Our campaign, Beyond demonstrates the importance of civil damages cases like Guantánamo: Rescue the ours for seeking justice when the government is protecting Constitution is issuing a call corporate interests at the expense of human life. • to action to all Americans concerned about the drastic erosion of rights in our country. It’s about more than one person, or one place, or one time. Moving Beyond Guan- Important Victory in Case Against tánamo means we must carry the fight to Guantánamo and beyond to all the areas where the government is CACI Corporation for Torture at taking the law into its own hands, and, as a people, we Abu Ghraib must move beyond the example of torture and dehu- manization set by our government. We need to restore In a key victory in the fight to end torture, a federal court justice and once again become a nation whose values are ruled on November 6 that CCR’s lawsuit against a private a beacon to other nations, not an embarrassment. military contractor in Iraq should be heard by a jury of Americans. The action was filed in 2004 against CACI and The expansion of executive power and the limitation of Titan, both of which were named in the military investiga- rights to all people, especially people of color and the tion of the Abu Ghraib scandal. disempowered, had tragic consequences during and after Hurricane Katrina. CCR’s recent hearing, “New The court today ruled that the case could go forward Orleans Coming Home: A National Hearing on the Role against CACI, whose employees worked as interrogators of Law Enforcement in the Reconstruction,” examined in the prison. The court found that that there was a dual the ways that law enforcement has had a negative chain of command where corporate employees were impact on the ability of residents to access housing, obliged to report abuse up the chain of command at education, employment, and other public services post- CACI. The court dismissed the claims against Titan, Katrina. New Orleans has become a national and even whose employees worked as translators, reasoning that international symbol of government neglect and racism, the military exercised exclusive control over translators. but we also know that these times of crisis offer us opportunities as a national community to create innova- The denial of summary judgment in the case means there tive new solutions to problems that plague so many of will be a jury trial of a private military contractor for our neighborhoods. torture. We hope this decision will send a message to all contractors that they cannot act with impunity and outside Looking back on my first year at the Center for Consti- the law. tutional Rights, I’m grateful to have worked with such dedicated and passionate colleagues and allies to fight “…No federal interest requires CACI be relieved of state law against this government’s unprecedented expansion of liability,” wrote the judge. “…The task of sorting through power. I’m glad to have had the opportunity to meet the disputed facts regarding the military’s command and some of our many donors around the country who help control of CACI’s employees will be for the jury.” make our work possible. I look forward to meeting more of our committed donors at our upcoming events. The Center for Constitutional Rights, Burke O’Neil LLC, and Akeel Valentine PLC brought the suit as a class Vincent Warren action on behalf of the hundreds of Iraqi torture victims Executive Director at Abu Ghraib. • CCR 666 Broadway, 7th floor, New York, NY 10012 • Phone (212) 614-6489 • Fax (212) 614-6422 Email [email protected] • www.CCRjustice.org 3 No Place to Hide: Filing Charges in France Against Rumsfeld While former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld prosecute individuals responsible for acts of torture if was visiting Paris on October 26 for a Foreign Policy they are present on French territory. Having resigned magazine-sponsored talk, CCR, in conjunction with as Secretary of Defense a year ago, Rumsfeld can no the European Center for Constitutional and Human longer try to claim immunity as a government official. Rights and the French League for Human Rights, filed a complaint with the Paris prosecutor, charging When the French prosecutor failed to act on the case, Rumsfeld with ordering and authorizing torture. As CCR formally requested the intervention of the U.N. a result, Rumsfeld was forced to leave his meeting Special Rapporteurs on the Independence of Judges by a side door connected to the U.S. Embassy in and Lawyers, and on Torture or Other Cruel, Inhuman order to avoid journalists and human rights attorneys or Degrading Treatment or Punishment who had waiting outside. CCR President Michael Ratner noted co-authored a February 2006 U.N. Report on that the filing of this case “demonstrates that we Guantánamo. Their report found that interrogation will not rest until those U.S. officials involved in the techniques authorized by Rumsfeld constituted torture program are brought to justice. Rumsfeld must torture and cruel treatment and were a direct understand that he has no place to hide.” violation of the Convention against Torture. The criminal complaint brings charges under the 1984 CCR will continue to work towards holding former Convention against Torture, which has been ratified Donald Rumsfeld accountable for his role in the Bush by both the U.S. and France. The complaint argues administration’s post-9/11 program of torture in that France is legally obligated to take up the case Guantánamo, Abu Ghraib, and elsewhere. CCR had because authorities in the U.S. and Iraq have failed filed two previous criminal complaints in Germany to do so, despite a well-documented paper trail under its universal jurisdiction statute, which allows implicating Rumsfeld and other high-level U.S. Germany to prosecute serious international crimes officials in direct as well as command responsibility regardless of where they occurred or the nationality for torture, and because the U.S. has refused to of the perpetrators. join the International Criminal Court.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Government Turns the Other Way As Judges Make Findings About Torture and Other Abuse
    USA SEE NO EVIL GOVERNMENT TURNS THE OTHER WAY AS JUDGES MAKE FINDINGS ABOUT TORTURE AND OTHER ABUSE Amnesty International Publications First published in February 2011 by Amnesty International Publications International Secretariat Peter Benenson House 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW United Kingdom www.amnesty.org Copyright Amnesty International Publications 2011 Index: AMR 51/005/2011 Original Language: English Printed by Amnesty International, International Secretariat, United Kingdom All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publishers. Amnesty International is a global movement of 2.2 million people in more than 150 countries and territories, who campaign on human rights. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights instruments. We research, campaign, advocate and mobilize to end abuses of human rights. Amnesty International is independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion. Our work is largely financed by contributions from our membership and donations CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 Judges point to human rights violations, executive turns away ........................................... 4 Absence
    [Show full text]
  • The Abu Ghraib Convictions: a Miscarriage of Justice
    Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal Volume 32 Article 4 9-1-2013 The Abu Ghraib Convictions: A Miscarriage of Justice Robert Bejesky Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/bpilj Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Robert Bejesky, The Abu Ghraib Convictions: A Miscarriage of Justice, 32 Buff. Envtl. L.J. 103 (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/bpilj/vol32/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ABU GHRAIB CONVICTIONS: A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE ROBERT BEJESKYt I. INTRODUCTION ..................... ..... 104 II. IRAQI DETENTIONS ...............................107 A. Dragnet Detentions During the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq.........................107 B. Legal Authority to Detain .............. ..... 111 C. The Abuse at Abu Ghraib .................... 116 D. Chain of Command at Abu Ghraib ..... ........ 119 III. BASIS FOR CRIMINAL CULPABILITY ..... ..... 138 A. Chain of Command ....................... 138 B. Systemic Influences ....................... 140 C. Reduced Rights of Military Personnel and Obedience to Authority ................ ..... 143 D. Interrogator Directives ................ ....
    [Show full text]
  • “Global War on Terror” Darryl Li
    Darryl Li / A Universal Enemy? DRAFT – 6 August 2009 A UNIVERSAL ENEMY?: LEGAL REGIMES OF EXCLUSION AND EXEMPTION UNDER THE “GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR” * DARRYL LI This essay argues that the ongoing U.S.-driven “Global War on Terror” stands apart from similar state campaigns in its special focus on confronting “foreign fighters” – armed transnational non-state Islamists operating outside their home countries – in places where the U.S. is no less foreign. This global hunt for foreign fighters animates diverse attempts to exclude similarly “out of place” Muslim migrants and travelers from legal protection by reshaping laws and policies on interrogation, detention, immigration, and citizenship. Yet at the same time, certain other outsiders – namely the U.S. and its allies – enjoy various forms of exemption from local legal accountability. This essay illustrates this braided logic of exclusion and exemption by juxtaposing the problems of extraordinary rendition and military contractor impunity in both post-war Bosnia- Herzegovina and post-invasion Iraq. This framework – which predates and will likely outlast the Bush administration – undermines the rule of law and state-building efforts and occludes crucial questions surrounding the legitimacy of how U.S. global power is exercised. This essay employs treaties, Bosnian, Iraqi, and U.S. statutes, cases, and regulations to reframe post-Cold War debates about nation-building and post-9/11 arguments about the laws of war. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 I. FOREIGN FIGHTER, MUSLIM OUT OF PLACE, UNIVERSAL ENEMY: THE ENDURING LOGIC OF THE “GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR”.................................................................................... 5 A. The Foreign Fighter as Figure of Threat.................................................................... 8 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 108 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 108 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 150 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, JUNE 23, 2004 No. 88—Part II Senate (Legislative day of Tuesday, June 22, 2004) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZA- port was not included as part of the stantive support to these personnel and TION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR President’s budget request and was not their families. 2005—Continued authorized within the bill now before Mrs. DOLE. I thank the distinguished Mrs. DOLE. Mr. President, I wonder the Senate. It is my understanding Chairman. Given this concurrence on if I might engage the distinguished that the decision to not include the Na- the importance of ensuring necessary Chairman in a brief colloquy. tional Demonstration Program for Cit- and effective support for our National Mr. WARNER. Certainly. izen-Soldier Support in the FY05 De- Guard and Reserve families, I ask the Mrs. DOLE. I thank my colleagues. fense Authorization bill was not made Chairman if he would be willing to sup- Mr. President, as a member of the Per- with prejudice to the program but, port my effort to bring this proposed sonnel Subcommittee, I am acutely rather, was based on the emerging na- Demonstration Program for Citizen- sensitive to the enormous challenges ture of the structure and deliverables Soldier Support to the attention of the confronting our National Guard and associated with this program—a pro- appropriate Department of Defense of- Reserve forces, and their families, as gram that is focusing on how to best fices.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibits Attached to Arguments on Admissibility, Declaration of Mohammed Abdullah Saleh Al-Asad, and Declaration of Zahra Ahmed Mohamed
    BEFORE THE AFRICAN COMMISSION FOR HUMAN & PEOPLES’ RIGHTS 49th ORDINARY SESSION: APRIL-MAY 2011 COMMUNICATION NO. 383/2010 In the matter between: MOHAMMED ABDULLAH SALEH AL-ASAD and DJIBOUTI EXHIBITS ATTACHED TO ARGUMENTS ON ADMISSIBILITY, DECLARATION OF MOHAMMED ABDULLAH SALEH AL-ASAD, AND DECLARATION OF ZAHRA AHMED MOHAMED EXHIBITS The United Republic of Tanzania Departure Declaration Card, 27 December 2003…….A Center for Human Rights and Global Justice, On the Record: U.S. Disclosures on Rendition, Secret Detention, and Coercive Interrogation (New York: NYU School of Law, 2008)………………………………………………………………………………..B Letter to the Attorney General of Djibouti, 31 March 2009…….….…..…….…….….…C United Nations Human Rights Council, 13th Session, Joint Study on Global Practices in Relation to Secret Detention in the Context of Countering Terrorism, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/13/42 (19 February 2010)………………………………………………………. D Republic v. Director of Immigration Services, ex parte Mohammed al-Asad (Habeas Corpus petition), High Court of Tanzania, 17 June 2004………………………………...E Amnesty International, United States of America: Below the radar- Secret flights to torture and ‘disappearance,’ 5 April 2006……………………………………………….F Prepared Remarks of Treasury Secretary John Snow to Announce Joint U.S. and Saudi Action Against Four Branches of Al-Haramain in the Financial War on Terror, JS-1107, 22 January 2004…………………………………………………………………………..G Henry Lyimo, Guardian (Dar es Salaam), Yemenis, Italians Expelled, 30 December 2003…………………………………………………………………………………...….H Roderick Ndomba, Daily News (Dar es Salaam), Dar Deports 2,367 Aliens, 30 December 2003……...……………………………..………………………………………………….I International Committee of the Red Cross, ICRC Report on the Treatment of Fourteen “High Value Detainees” in CIA Custody, 2007…………………………..……….……...J International Seismological Centre Earthquake Data…………………………………….K U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Report
    By the Numbers Findings of the Detainee Abuse and Accountability Project HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH April 2006 Volume 18, No. 2(G) By the Numbers Findings of the Detainee Abuse and Accountability Project Summary..........................................................................................................................................1 By the Numbers .............................................................................................................................6 Analysis............................................................................................................................................9 Criminal Punishments: Verdicts and Sentencing..................................................................9 Officers’ Liability Under the Command Responsibility Doctrine ...................................11 Reliance on Non-judicial Hearings and Punishment .........................................................13 Investigative Failures...............................................................................................................17 Recommendations .......................................................................................................................23 Appendix A: Chart of Key Statistics.........................................................................................24 Appendix B: Sample Homicide Cases Documented by Human Rights First ....................25 Summary Two years ago, revelations about the abuse of detainees in U.S. custody at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq shocked
    [Show full text]
  • Guantanamo Bay Fair Trial Manual: Excerpts
    [Page Numbers for these Excerpts -- Page 1 of 152] [Printed 14 June 2019] [Prelimonary Draft - Still Begin Researched and Edited] Page 1 GTMO Bay Fair Trial Manual (Excerpts) www.GitmoObserver.com [8 August 2017, 6:15 pm] Guantanamo Bay Fair Trial Manual: Excerpts The Guantanamo Bay Fair Trial Manual1 is a two-volume resource of over 500 pages. It is available in print and online at The Gitmo Observer (gitmoobserver.com).2 This excerpted version of the Manual is designed to assist you in preparing for Military Commission hearings. It is not intended to replace the full version, which you are encouraged to read to help make it easier to fulfill any remit you may have in attending or monitoring hearings. The following Manual chapters and resources are reproduced in these Manual Excerpts. Chapter I Preface: Explains the early roots & purposes of the Guantanamo Bay Fair Trial Manual Chapter II: How to Use the Guantanamo Bay Fair Trail Manual Chapter IV: Abbreviations (helpful with alphabet soup of military jargon) Chapter V: What is the Right to a Fair Trial?: (identifies stakeholders; U.S. & international law) Chapter VI: Roles & Responsibilities of NGO Observers at GTMO Chapter VII: Background & Brief History of the GTMO U.S. Military Commissions Chapter VIII: General Information About the Case to be Observed (a checklist use as you prepare) Rights – Selected (Right to be Presumed Innocent (Category A); Right to Trial by Competent, Independent & Impartial Tribunal (Category D); Right to Public Proceedings (Category P)) Rights & Interests of NGO Observers (Category XVII) Rights & Interests of JTF-GTMO (Category XIV) Glossary: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 109Th Hrcttee AI Submission USA to the CCPR Final
    USA A SUBMISSION TO THE UN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE 109 TH SESSION OF THE COMMITTEE (14 OCTOBER TO 1 NOVEMBER 2013) Amnesty International Publications First published in September 2013 by Amnesty International Publications International Secretariat Peter Benenson House 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW United Kingdom www.amnesty.org Copyright Amnesty International Publications 2013 Index: AMR 51/061/2013 Original Language: English Printed by Amnesty International, International Secretariat, United Kingdom All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publishers. Amnesty International is a global movement of 3 million people in more than 150 countries and territories, who campaign on human rights. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights instruments. We research, campaign, advocate and mobilize to end abuses of human rights. Amnesty International is independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion. Our work is largely financed by contributions from our membership and donations Table of contents A. Introduction .............................................................................................................1 B. The USA’s position on treaty ratification and implementation ........................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Cageprisoners Cageprisoners
    CAGEPRISONERS BEYOND THE LAW – The War on Terror’s Secret Network of Detentions AFRICA East Africa PRISON NAME LOCATION CONTROL SITE CONDITIONS DETAINEES STATUS Unknown Unknown East African Arabic Muhammad al-Assad was taken from his - Muhammad al- Suspected speaking jailers, with home in Tanzania and was only told that Assad Proxy Detention possibly Somali or orders had come from very high sources that Facility Ethiopian accents. he should be taken. The next thing he knew he had been taken on a plane for three hours to a very hot place. His jailers who would take him for interrogation spoke Arabic with a Somali or Ethiopian accent and had been served with bread that was typical of those regions. He was held in this prison for a period of about 2 weeks during which time he was interrogated by an English-speaking woman a white western man who spoke good Arabic. 1 Egypt Al Jihaz / State Situated in Nasr State Security Many former detainees have consistently - Ahmad Abou El Confirmed Security City which is in Intelligence approximated that cells within this centre are Maati Proxy Detention Intelligence an eastern roughly four feet wide and ten foot long, with - Maajid Nawaz Facility National suburb of Cairo many packed together, and with many more - Reza Pankhurst Headquarters detainees held within a small area. A torture - Ian Nesbit room is also alleged to be close by to these cells so that detainees, even when not being tortured themselves, were privy to the constant screams of others. Abou Zabel 20 miles from State Security El Maati reports that he spent some weeks in - Ahmad Abou El Confirmed the centre of Intelligence this prison.
    [Show full text]
  • The Continuing Pursuit of Unchecked Executive Power 13 May 2005 AI Index: AMR 51/063/2005
    Public amnesty international UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Guantánamo and beyond: The continuing pursuit of unchecked executive power 13 May 2005 AI Index: AMR 51/063/2005 I used to think that America had respect for human rights when it came to prison. Mohammed Nechle, extrajudicially removed from Bosnia and Herzegovina by US agents1 My husband is a tall man with black hair and black eyes…He is now imprisoned in Guantánamo. We don’t know why. Wife of Mohammed Nechle, Algerian national, 20042 Public ........................................................................................................................ - 1 - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA .......................................................................... - 1 - Guantánamo and beyond: The continuing pursuit of unchecked executive power .. - 1 - 1. Summary: The pursuit of unfettered executive power .................................. - 3 - 2. Violating human rights erodes security and trust in government ............... - 10 - 3. Guantánamo detainees – the international legal framework ....................... - 13 - 4. Hypocrisy vs. human rights ........................................................................ - 15 - 5. Human rights law rejected by a war mentality ........................................... - 28 - 6. Seeking to render the Rasul decision meaningless ..................................... - 45 - 7. A judge with security credentials takes a more critical view ..................... - 52 - 8. The Combatant Status Review Tribunal – no laughing matter ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Diss Koenig Final July 2013
    Indefinite Detention / Enduring Freedom: What Former Detainees’ Experiences Can Teach Us About Institutional Violence, Resistance and the Law By Kimberly Alexa Koenig A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Calvin Morrill, Chair Professor Marianne Constable Professor Laurel Fletcher Professor Jonathan Simon Fall 2013 Abstract Indefinite Detention / Enduring Freedom: What Former Detainees’ Experiences Can Teach Us About Institutional Violence, Resistance and the Law by Kimberly Alexa Koenig Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy University of California, Berkeley Professor Calvin Morrill, Chair This dissertation focuses on the experiences of former Guantánamo detainees as communicated in 78 interviews. An analysis of those interviews centers on former detainees’ “worst” experiences to parse how those experiences might inform society’s understanding of cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. The dissertation is organized into nine chapters. Chapter one situates this study in the context of the United States’ response to the events of 9/11, with an emphasis on the imprisonment of individuals at the U.S. detention center in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. This chapter summarizes the major philosophical, legal and social science research relevant to detainees’ experiences—including analyses of cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment—and explains how this dissertation contributes to existing empirical work. In this chapter, I argue that Guantánamo is an example of the United States’ use of incarceration as a means of social control that has extended beyond the nation’s borders, and discuss the possible relationship of political-military prisons to the phenomenal growth of supermax prisons in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Politikon Vol. 35 1.2
    POLITIKON: The IAPSS Journal of Political Science Vol 35 (December 2017) Identity, Securitization, and New Norm Creation: The evolution of US normative behavior during the Global War on Terror Filip Svítek https://doi.org/10.22151/politikon.35.1 Filip Svítek is a recent Master’s graduate from Univerzita Karlova (Charles University) in Prague. There he studied international security, and wrote his thesis on non-material motives for conflict. He has published work with STRATPOL on network-centric warfare (ISBN 978-80-972526-0-1) and indirect strategic coercion with Karolinum Press (ISBN 978-80-246-3674-0). His field experience includes praxis with the Czech Foreign Ministry in Los Angeles and the US State Department in Zagreb. Abstract This article explores domestic security policy and international threats through a constructivist lens, examining how the US Central Intelligence Agency functionally employs controversial tactics such as coercive interrogations and extrajudicial detention within a society that represents liberal normative democracy – one that in theory should prefer to uphold norms of human rights rather than infringe upon them. There appear to be two main concepts at play: security as an underlying cultural identity (i.e. a product) and security as a subjective act (i.e. a process). In particular, National Security Culture (the product) and securitization (the process) can together allow for the evolution of normative behavior. Empirical results show that techniques of enhanced interrogation, practiced furtively during the
    [Show full text]