Questions for Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Questions for Review 21st Expert Committee on Selection and Use of Essential Medicines Peer Review Report [Erlotonib, Gefitinib, Crizotinib] (1) Does the application adequately address the issue of the public health need for the medicine? Yes No Systemic chemotherapy is generally indicated for patients who present with advanced NSCLC, including those who present with metastases (stage IV) or recur following initial definitive treatment. The goals of patient management for patients with advanced NSCLC are to prolong survival and to maintain the quality of life for as long as possible, while minimizing the side effects due to treatment. Analysis for EGFR and ALK is indicated for the presence of a driver mutation for which a specific inhibitor is available, for all patients whose tumor contains an element of adenocarcinoma, regardless of the clinical characteristics of the tumor. Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase are observed in approximately 15 percent of NSCLC adenocarcinoma in the United States; and occur more frequently in never smokers/light smoker and females [1]. In the United States, the Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium analyzed samples using multiplex genotyping from 733 patients with adenocarcinoma at 14 centers in the United States, identifying a targetable driver mutation in 466 cases (64 percent). In Asian populations, the incidence of EGFR mutations is substantially higher, up to 62 percent. These studies underscore the potential clinical benefit and prognostic utility provided by large-scale utilization of molecular profiling in lung cancer. In the PIONEER study, tumor was analyzed from 1482 patients with adenocarcinoma in seven Asian regions (China, Hong Kong, India, Philippines, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam) [2]. The incidence of EGFR mutations ranged from 22 to 62 percent. Although EGFR mutations were more common in nonsmokers, the incidence still was 37 percent in regular smokers. The frequency of such mutations was higher in women than in men, but the difference was not significant after considering the frequency of smoking. With progressive availability of molecular profiling in developing regions of the world, targeted therapy is required to improve progression free survival and likely overall survival of this high burden disease community while maintaining their quality of life. (2) Have all important studies/evidence of which you are aware been included in the application? Yes No Please provide brief comments on any relevant studies that have not been included: Though EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been associated with significant prolongation of progression free survival in non-small cell lung cancer harbouring activating EGFR mutations, there is little or no benefit demonstrated in overall survival in large clinical trials. This likely reflects the effect post trial treatments have on OS, especially cross over to TKI upon progression on chemotherapy Data from 13 phase III trials comparing EGFR TKIs with platinum based chemotherapy are summarised in a large meta-analysis that includes data from 1475 EGFR mutation positive patients (2620 patients in total). PFS was significantly improved (HR-0.43), while no effect on OS was observed (HR-1.01) [3] ERLOTINIB: Erlotinib has been compared with chemotherapy in several randomized trials in patients with EGFR mutated lung cancer, all of which demonstrated a benefit in progression free survival, but not in overall survival some of which are summarized below: (cross over allowed in all trials) TRIAL PATIENT PFS (months) OS (months) NO erlotinib chemotherapy erlotinib chemotherapy Optimal 154 13.1 4.6 22.8 27.2 [4,5] Ensure 275 11 5.5 26.3 25.5 [6] Eurtac 157 9.7 5.2 19.3 19.5 [7] AFATINIB: Efficacy of Afatinib in treatment of EGFR mutation positive lung cancer has been demonstrated in 2 large phase III trials, LUX Lung 3 and LUX Lung 6. In a combined analysis of 2 trials, LUX lung 3 and LUX Lung 6 (n=709) comparing first line Afatinib with platinum based chemotherapy in previously untreated patients, despite a significant benefit in PFS there was no benefit in median overall survival in Afatinib treated patients. However, in a preplanned analysis based on specific EGFR mutation, OS was significantly longer for patients with del 19 positive tumours in Afatinib group than in chemotherapy group in both trials: in LUX lung 3, median OS was 33.3 months in afatinib vs 21.1 months in chemotherapy group (p value=0.00150, in LUX lung 6 it was 31.4 months vs 18.4 months (p value= 0.023) respectively. Similar benefit was not seen in patients with tumours harbouring EGFR L858R mutations. [8] GEFITINIB: The most robust data for gefitinib comes from IPASS trial which randomized 1271 patients to gefitinb or carbolplatin and paclitaxel. Progression free survival was significantly better with gefitinib as compared to chemotherapy (12 months median progression free rate 25 vs 7 percent, HR-0.74) though overall survival was not significantly different ( 18-8 months vs 1704 months , HR-0.9). 2 additional phase III trials, West Japan Oncology group trial 1712 and North East Japan study group trial 002 demonstrated similar magnitude of benefit. [9,10] COMPARISON OF EGFR TKIs: In one study, gefitinib demonstrated comparable efficacy with erlotinib [11]. The three EGFR TKIs have similar efficacy, choice is individualized based on patients’ and doctors’ preference. Some data suggest Afatinib may yield strongest tumor response but also causes most side effects while Gefitinib may be best tolerated. CRIZOTINIB: A group of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have tumors that contain an inversion in chromosome 2 that juxtaposes the 5' end of the echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4) gene with the 3' end of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene, resulting in the novel fusion oncogene EML4-ALK. ALK gene rearrangements occur in up to 7% of NSCLC and are mutually exclusive with EGFR mutations.ALK rearranged lung cancers are “addicted“ to ALK fusion protein for their growth and are highly sensitive to treatment with an ALK inhibitor The efficacy of crizotinib has been demonstrated in randomized trials limited to patients whose tumors had the ALK rearrangement. A phase III trial randomly assigned 347 patients who had previously been treated to either crizotinib or single-agent pemetrexed or docetaxel [12]. At a median follow-up of 12 months, progression-free survival, the primary endpoint of the trial, was significantly increased with crizotinib compared with chemotherapy (median, 7.7 versus 3 months; HR for progression 0.49).There was no significant difference in overall survival (median, 20.3 versus 22.8 months; HR for death 1.02). The absence of an overall survival benefit presumably reflects subsequent treatment since 64 percent of chemotherapy- treated patients had crossed over to crizotinib after progressing on chemotherapy. Similar outcomes have been observed in chemotherapy-naïve patients [13]. (3) Does the application provide adequate evidence of efficacy/effectiveness of the medicine for the proposed use? Yes No (a) Briefly summarise the reported benefits (e.g. clinical versus surrogate) and comment, where possible, on the actual magnitude of benefit associated with use of the medicine: EGFR TKI therapy does prolong PFS in EGFR mutation positive patient and is associated with improved quality of life. In a meta-analysis comparing TKIs with chemotherapy the frontline HR for EGFR mutation positive tumours treated with EGFR TKIs is reported to be 0.43 and second line as HR-0.34. The clinically insignificant effect on overall survival is most likely related to cross over effect. Similarly, clinically significant progression free survival improvements are demonstrated with ALK inhibitors in ALK rearranged NSCLC. (b) Is there evidence of efficacy in diverse settings and/or populations? Please provide brief details: Yes There are large randomized studies conducted all over the globe including China, Singapore, Turkey, India, Taiwan and Japan (4) Has the application adequately considered the safety and adverse effects of the medicine? Are there any adverse effects of concern, or that may require special monitoring? Yes No Please provide brief details: Few additional but rare AEs include ocular complications (ulcerative keratitis and corneal perforation) serious dermatologic reaction (steven Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis) and pancreatitis. While on these medications, regular monitoring of liver function is required, however, no special/expensive testing is required. Most health care facilities will be able to cope with these monitoring requirements. (5) Please comment on the overall benefit to risk ratio of the medicine (e.g., favourable, uncertain etc). The EGFR TKIs (erlotinib, afatinib, gefitinib) and ALK inhibitor (Crizotinib) have a favorable benefit risk ratio. ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: (6) Are there special requirements or training needed for the safe, effective and/or appropriate use of the medicine? Yes No Please provide brief details: Prior to the initiation of these medications we need to establish mutational status of EGFR and ALK which can be done through Immunohistochemistry, FISH and RT-PCR. Among these immunohistochemistry is the most cost effective, sensitive and specific test. All of these medications are orally administered and can be taken by patients at home. (7) Are there any issues regarding the registration of the medicine by regulatory authorities? (e.g., recent registration, new indications, off-label use) Yes No Please provide brief details: (8) Is the medicine recommended for use in a current WHO GRC-approved Guideline (i.e., post 2008)? Yes No Please provide brief details: (9) Please comment briefly on issues regarding cost and affordability of this medicine. Generic of all the 3 drugs are available from South America, India & Mexico. The price range varies between $8 to $250 depending on the drug. At theses rates a vast majority of patients will be able to purchase these drugs a major advantage is these drugs do not have major side effects. Access to hospital care is less and overall cost medical care is decreased.
Recommended publications
  • Resistance Mechanisms to Targeted Therapies in ROS1+ and ALK+ Non−Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Published OnlineFirst April 10, 2018; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2452 Cancer Therapy: Clinical Clinical Cancer Research Resistance Mechanisms to Targeted Therapies in ROS1þ and ALKþ Non–small Cell Lung Cancer Caroline E. McCoach1, Anh T. Le2, Katherine Gowan3, Kenneth Jones3, Laura Schubert2, Andrea Doak2, Adriana Estrada-Bernal2, Kurtis D. Davies4, Daniel T. Merrick4, Paul A. BunnJr2, W. Tom Purcell2, Rafal Dziadziuszko5, Marileila Varella-Garcia2, Dara L. Aisner4, D. Ross Camidge2, and Robert C. Doebele2 Abstract Purpose: Despite initial benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitors and b-catenin mutations and HER2-mediated bypass signaling as þ (TKIs), patients with advanced non–smallcelllungcancer(NSCLC) non-ROS1–dominant resistance mechanisms. In the ALK þ þ harboring ALK (ALK )andROS1 (ROS1 ) gene fusions ultimately cohort, we identified a novel NRG1 gene fusion, a RET fusion, progress. Here, we report on the potential resistance mechanisms 2 EGFR, and 3 KRAS mutations, as well as mutations in IDH1, þ þ in a series of patients with ALK and ROS1 NSCLC progressing RIT1, NOTCH, and NF1. In addition, we identified CNV in on different types and/or lines of ROS1/ALK–targeted therapy. multiple proto-oncogenes genes including PDGFRA, KIT, KDR, Experimental Design: We used a combination of next-gener- GNAS, K/HRAS, RET, NTRK1, MAP2K1, and others. ation sequencing (NGS), multiplex mutation assay, direct DNA Conclusions: We identified a putative TKI resistance mech- þ sequencing, RT-PCR, and FISH to identify fusion variants/partners anism in six of 12 (50%) ROS1 patients and 37 of 43 (86%) þ and copy-number gain (CNG), kinase domain mutations (KDM), ALK patients.
    [Show full text]
  • S41598-018-33190-8.Pdf
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Ankyrin Repeat Domain 1 Overexpression is Associated with Common Resistance to Afatinib and Received: 20 February 2018 Accepted: 25 September 2018 Osimertinib in EGFR-mutant Lung Published: xx xx xxxx Cancer Akiko Takahashi1, Masahiro Seike1, Mika Chiba1, Satoshi Takahashi1, Shinji Nakamichi1, Masaru Matsumoto1, Susumu Takeuchi1, Yuji Minegishi1, Rintaro Noro1, Shinobu Kunugi2, Kaoru Kubota1 & Akihiko Gemma1 Overcoming acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) is critical in combating EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We tried to construct a novel therapeutic strategy to conquer the resistance to second-and third-generation EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-positive NSCLC patients. We established afatinib- and osimertinib-resistant lung adenocarcinoma cell lines. Exome sequencing, cDNA array and miRNA microarray were performed using the established cell lines to discover novel therapeutic targets associated with the resistance to second-and third-generation EGFR-TKIs. We found that ANKRD1 which is associated with the epithelial- mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenomenon and anti-apoptosis, was overexpressed in the second-and third-generation EGFR-TKIs-resistant cells at the mRNA and protein expression levels. When ANKRD1 was silenced in the EGFR-TKIs-resistant cell lines, afatinib and osimertinib could induce apoptosis of the cell lines. Imatinib could inhibit ANKRD1 expression, resulting in restoration of the sensitivity to afatinib and osimertinib of EGFR-TKI-resistant cells. In EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients, ANKRD1 was overexpressed in the tumor after the failure of EGFR-TKI therapy, especially after long-duration EGFR- TKI treatments. ANKRD1 overexpression which was associated with EMT features and anti-apoptosis, was commonly involved in resistance to second-and third-generation EGFR-TKIs.
    [Show full text]
  • Gefitinib and Afatinib Show Potential Efficacy for Fanconi Anemia−Related Head and Neck Cancer
    Published OnlineFirst January 31, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1625 CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH | TRANSLATIONAL CANCER MECHANISMS AND THERAPY Gefitinib and Afatinib Show Potential Efficacy for Fanconi Anemia–Related Head and Neck Cancer Helena Montanuy1, Agueda Martínez-Barriocanal2,3, Jose Antonio Casado4,5, Llorenc¸ Rovirosa1, Maria Jose Ramírez1,4,6, Rocío Nieto2, Carlos Carrascoso-Rubio4,5, Pau Riera6,7, Alan Gonzalez 8, Enrique Lerma7, Adriana Lasa4,6, Jordi Carreras-Puigvert9, Thomas Helleday9, Juan A. Bueren4,5, Diego Arango2,3, Jordi Minguillon 1,4,5, and Jordi Surralles 1,4,5 ABSTRACT ◥ Purpose: Fanconi anemia rare disease is characterized by bone two best candidates, gefitinib and afatinib, EGFR inhibitors marrow failure and a high predisposition to solid tumors, especially approved for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), displayed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Patients with nontumor/tumor IC50 ratios of approximately 400 and approx- Fanconi anemia with HNSCC are not eligible for conventional imately 100 times, respectively. Neither gefitinib nor afatinib therapies due to high toxicity in healthy cells, predominantly activated the Fanconi anemia signaling pathway or induced hematotoxicity, and the only treatment currently available is sur- chromosomal fragility in Fanconi anemia cell lines. Importantly, gical resection. In this work, we searched and validated two already both drugs inhibited tumor growth in xenograft experiments in approved drugs as new potential therapies for HNSCC in patients immunodeficient mice using two Fanconi anemia patient– with Fanconi anemia. derived HNSCCs. Finally, in vivo toxicity studies in Fanca- Experimental Design: We conducted a high-content screening deficient mice showed that administration of gefitinib or afatinib of 3,802 drugs in a FANCA-deficient tumor cell line to identify was well-tolerated, displayed manageable side effects, no toxicity nongenotoxic drugs with cytotoxic/cytostatic activity.
    [Show full text]
  • A Novel Mechanism of Crizotinib Resistance in a ROS1+ NSCLC Patient 11 April 2016
    A novel mechanism of crizotinib resistance in a ROS1+ NSCLC patient 11 April 2016 Molecular analysis of a tumor biopsy from a proto- fusion gene in the crizotinib resistant tumor samples oncogene 1 receptor tyrosine kinase positive compared to the pretreatment tumor samples by (ROS1+) patient with acquired crizotinib resistance DNA sequencing or FISH analysis. SNaPshot revealed a novel mutation in the v-kit Hardy analysis of the crizotinib resistant tumor identified a Zuckerman 4 feline sarcoma viral oncogene novel mutation in the KIT gene encoding the amino homolog receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT) that can acid substitution, pD816G. The drug ponatinib, a potentially be targeted by KIT inhibitors. KIT tyrosine kinase inhibitor, demonstrated inhibition of KITD816G kinase activity. Further, in Chromosomal rearrangements of the gene ROS1+ cells expressing KITD816G the addition of encoding ROS1 in approximately 1-2% of non- ponatinib resensitized cells to crizotinib. small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). Treatment of ROS1+ patients with crizotinib, a small-molecule The authors comment that, "Although our results tyrosine kinase inhibitor, often results in durable demonstrate that ponatinib can overcome KIT- tumor regression. However, despite initial mediated resistance in vitro, it remains unknown treatment success patients typically develop whether ponatinib can overcome this or other KIT resistance to crizotinib and disease progression activating mutations in patients. Detection of KIT inevitably ensues. Understanding the mechanism mutations may allow enrollment of patients with of resistance to crizotinib and identifying new ROS1+ cancer (or other oncogenes), onto clinical targets for therapy will help guide patient trials of KIT inhibitors, however it is likely that dual treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Discipline Review
    CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 761139Orig1s000 MULTI-DISCIPLINE REVIEW Summary Review Office Director Cross Discipline Team Leader Review Clinical Review Non-Clinical Review Statistical Review Clinical Pharmacology Review NDA/BLA Multi-disciplinary Review and Evaluation {BLA 761139} ENHERTU (fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki) NDA/BLA Multi-disciplinary Review and Evaluation Disclaimer: In this document, the sections labeled as “The Applicant’s Position” are completed by the Applicant, which do not necessarily reflect the positions of the FDA. Application Type Biologics License Application (BLA) 351(a) Application Number BLA 761139 Priority or Standard Priority Submit Date(s) August 29, 2019 Received Date(s) August 29, 2019 PDUFA Goal Date April 29, 2020 Division/Office DO1/OOD/OND/CDER Review Completion Date Electronic Stamp Date Established Name fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (Proposed) Trade Name ENHERTU Pharmacologic Class HER2-directed antibody and topoisomerase inhibitor conjugate Code name Applicant Daiichi Sankyo, Inc Formulation(s) 100 mg lyophilized powder Dosing Regimen 5.4 mg IV every 3 weeks (b) (4) Applicant Proposed Indication(s)/Population(s) Recommendation on Accelerated Approval Regulatory Action Recommended Treatment of adult patients with unresectable or metastatic Indication(s)/Population(s) HER2-positive breast cancer who have received two or more (if applicable) prior anti-HER2-based regimens in the metastatic setting. 1 Version date: June 11, 2019 (ALL NDA/BLA reviews) Disclaimer: In this document, the sections labeled as “The Applicant’s Position” are completed by the Applicant and do not necessarily reflect the positions of the FDA. Reference ID: 4537638 NDA/BLA Multi-disciplinary Review and Evaluation {BLA 761139} ENHERTU (fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki) Table of Contents Reviewers of Multi-Disciplinary Review and Evaluation .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Cardiac Risk of Anti-Cancer Drugs
    PREDICTING CARDIAC RISK OF ANTI-CANCER DRUGS: A ROLE FOR HUMAN INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL-DERIVED CARDIOMYOCYTES Andrew Bruening-Wright, Leslie Ellison, James Kramer, Carlos A. Obejero-Paz Charles River, Cleveland 1 ABSTRACT 3 METHODS 1) The Field Potential and Impedance signals Cardiotoxicity is a major complication of many anti-cancer drugs. Acute effects on cardiac ion channels alter cardiac excitability and induce arrhythmias and ultimately heart failure can develop during chronic treatment. Current in vitro strategies for detecting these risks are minimal and often ineffective, particularly for effects that occur over the course of days or weeks. We aimed to validate a human We used the xCELLigence RTCA CardioECR instrument (ACEA Biosciences) to record impedance and extracellular field A B C cell-based assay that is fast, robust, and predictive of both acute and chronic clinical outcomes. Currently marketed chemotherapeutic agents were tested on the CDI-CardioECR system (CDI/Fujifilm- 2 a b ACEA Biosciences). Cardiomyocytes were exposed for eight days to doxorubicin and various tyrosine kinase inhibitors (erlotinib, lapatinib, nilotinib, sunitinib, and crizotinib) at concentrations comparable potentials. iCell cardiomyocytes , from Cellular Dynamics International/FUJIFILM. Spontaneous twitch activity was recorded for to clinical plasma values. Recordings were made at multiple time points each day and data was analyzed using proprietary algorithms written in VSA and Matlab. Drugs with hERG channel block liability two 48 well plates. Analysis was performed using Origin, Matlab and macros written in VBA. The output of the instrument is the (lapatinib, nilotinib, sunitinib and crizotinib) showed a dose dependent delay in repolarization and an increase in dysrhythmic markers.
    [Show full text]
  • Dual Targeting of HER2-Positive Cancer with Trastuzumab Emtansine and Pertuzumab: Critical Role for Neuregulin Blockade in Antitumor Response to Combination Therapy
    Published OnlineFirst October 4, 2013; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0358 Clinical Cancer Cancer Therapy: Clinical Research See related article by Gwin and Spector, p. 278 Dual Targeting of HER2-Positive Cancer with Trastuzumab Emtansine and Pertuzumab: Critical Role for Neuregulin Blockade in Antitumor Response to Combination Therapy Gail D. Lewis Phillips1, Carter T. Fields1, Guangmin Li1, Donald Dowbenko1, Gabriele Schaefer1, Kathy Miller5, Fabrice Andre6, Howard A. Burris III8, Kathy S. Albain9, Nadia Harbeck10, Veronique Dieras7, Diana Crivellari11, Liang Fang2, Ellie Guardino3, Steven R. Olsen3, Lisa M. Crocker4, and Mark X. Sliwkowski1 Abstract Purpose: Targeting HER2 with multiple HER2-directed therapies represents a promising area of treatment for HER2-positive cancers. We investigated combining the HER2-directed antibody–drug con- jugate trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) with the HER2 dimerization inhibitor pertuzumab (Perjeta). Experimental Design: Drug combination studies with T-DM1 and pertuzumab were performed on cultured tumor cells and in mouse xenograft models of HER2-amplified cancer. In patients with HER2- positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (mBC), T-DM1 was dose-escalated with a fixed standard pertuzumab dose in a 3þ3 phase Ib/II study design. Results: Treatment of HER2-overexpressing tumor cells in vitro with T-DM1 plus pertuzumab resulted in synergistic inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of apoptotic cell death. The presence of the HER3 ligand, heregulin (NRG-1b), reduced the cytotoxic activity of T-DM1 in a subset of breast cancer lines; this effect was reversed by the addition of pertuzumab. Results from mouse xenograft models showed enhanced antitumor efficacy with T-DM1 and pertuzumab resulting from the unique antitumor activities of each agent.
    [Show full text]
  • BC Cancer Benefit Drug List September 2021
    Page 1 of 65 BC Cancer Benefit Drug List September 2021 DEFINITIONS Class I Reimbursed for active cancer or approved treatment or approved indication only. Reimbursed for approved indications only. Completion of the BC Cancer Compassionate Access Program Application (formerly Undesignated Indication Form) is necessary to Restricted Funding (R) provide the appropriate clinical information for each patient. NOTES 1. BC Cancer will reimburse, to the Communities Oncology Network hospital pharmacy, the actual acquisition cost of a Benefit Drug, up to the maximum price as determined by BC Cancer, based on the current brand and contract price. Please contact the OSCAR Hotline at 1-888-355-0355 if more information is required. 2. Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) code only applicable to Class I drugs where indicated. 3. Intrahepatic use of chemotherapy drugs is not reimbursable unless specified. 4. For queries regarding other indications not specified, please contact the BC Cancer Compassionate Access Program Office at 604.877.6000 x 6277 or [email protected] DOSAGE TUMOUR PROTOCOL DRUG APPROVED INDICATIONS CLASS NOTES FORM SITE CODES Therapy for Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer using abiraterone tablet Genitourinary UGUMCSPABI* R Abiraterone and Prednisone Palliative Therapy for Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer abiraterone tablet Genitourinary UGUPABI R Using Abiraterone and prednisone acitretin capsule Lymphoma reversal of early dysplastic and neoplastic stem changes LYNOS I first-line treatment of epidermal
    [Show full text]
  • Pulmonary Toxicities of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors
    Pulmonary Toxicities of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Maajid Mumtaz Peerzada, MD, Timothy P. Spiro, MD, FACP, and Hamed A. Daw, MD Dr. Peerzada is a Resident in the Depart- Abstract: The incidence of pulmonary toxicities with the use of ment of Internal Medicine at Fairview tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is not very high; however, various Hospital in Cleveland, Ohio. Dr. Spiro and case reports and studies continue to show significant variability in Dr. Daw are Staff Physicians at the Cleve- the incidence of these adverse events, ranging from 0.2% to 10.9%. land Clinic Foundation Cancer Center, in Cleveland, Ohio. Gefitinib and erlotinib are orally active, small-molecule inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase that are mainly used to treat non-small cell lung cancer. Imatinib is an inhibitor of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase that is used to treat various leukemias, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and other cancers. In this article, we Address correspondence to: review data to identify the very rare but fatal pulmonary toxicities Maajid Mumtaz Peerzada, MD Medicor Associates of Chautauqua (mostly interstitial lung disease) caused by these drugs. Internal Medicine 12 Center Street Fredonia, NY 14063 Introduction Phone: 716-679-2233 E-mail: [email protected] Tyrosine kinases are enzymes that activate the phosphorylation of tyro- sine residues by transferring the terminal phosphate of ATP. Some of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) currently used in the treatment of various malignancies include imatinib (Gleevec, Novartis), erlotinib (Tarceva, Genentech/OSI), and gefitinib (Iressa, AstraZeneca). This article presents a basic introduction (mechanism of action and indi- cations of use) of these TKIs and summarizes the incidence, various clinical presentations, diagnosis, treatment options, and outcomes of patients around the world that presented with pulmonary toxicities caused by these drugs.
    [Show full text]
  • Trastuzumab and Paclitaxel in Patients with EGFR Mutated NSCLC That Express HER2 After Progression on EGFR TKI Treatment
    www.nature.com/bjc ARTICLE Clinical Study Trastuzumab and paclitaxel in patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC that express HER2 after progression on EGFR TKI treatment Adrianus J. de Langen1,2, M. Jebbink1, Sayed M. S. Hashemi2, Justine L. Kuiper2, J. de Bruin-Visser2, Kim Monkhorst3, Erik Thunnissen4 and Egbert F. Smit1,2 BACKGROUND: HER2 expression and amplification are observed in ~15% of tumour biopsies from patients with a sensitising EGFR mutation who develop EGFR TKI resistance. It is unknown whether HER2 targeting in this setting can result in tumour responses. METHODS: A single arm phase II study was performed to study the safety and efficacy of trastuzumab and paclitaxel treatment in patients with a sensitising EGFR mutation who show HER2 expression in a tumour biopsy (IHC ≥ 1) after progression on EGFR TKI treatment. Trastuzumab (first dose 4 mg/kg, thereafter 2 mg/kg) and paclitaxel (60 mg/m2) were dosed weekly until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end-point was tumour response rate according to RECIST v1.1. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled. Nine patients were exon 21 L858R positive and fifteen exon 19 del positive. Median HER2 IHC was 2+ (range 1–3). For 21 patients, gene copy number by in situ hybridisation could be calculated: 5 copies/nucleus (n = 9), 5–10 copies (n = 8), and >10 copies (n = 4). An objective response was observed in 11/24 (46%) patients. Highest response rates were seen for patients with 3+ HER2 IHC (12 patients, ORR 67%) or HER2 copy number ≥10 (4 patients, ORR 100%). Median tumour change in size was 42% decrease (range −100% to +53%).
    [Show full text]
  • Predictors of the Response to Gefitinib in Refractory Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
    2244 Vol. 11, 2244–2251, March 15, 2005 Clinical Cancer Research Predictors of the Response to Gefitinib in Refractory Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Kyu-Sik Kim,1,2 Ju-Yeon Jeong,1,2 Young-Chul those with non-adenocarcinoma showed a mutation of the Kim,1,2 Kook-Joo Na,1,3 Yun-Hyeon Kim,1,4 EGFR gene, the genetic profile may replace those variables as an independent predictor of a response. Sung-Ja Ahn,1,5 Sun-Mi Baek,1 Chang-Soo Park,6 Chang-Min Park,2 Yu-Il Kim,2 Sung-Chul Lim,2 INTRODUCTION and Kyung-Ok Park7 Lung cancer has been the leading cause of cancer death in 1Lung and Esophageal Cancer Clinic, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Jeollanam-do, South Korea; Departments of South Korea, as in many other parts of the world, since the year 2Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, 3Thoracic and Cardiovascular 2000 (1). As the global burden of lung cancer continues to increase, Surgery, 4Diagnostic Radiology, 5Radiation Oncology, and 6Pathology, new agents are being developed for more effective treatment and Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, South Korea; palliation of symptoms. Lung cancer has been treated with a wide 7 and Department of Internal Medicine, Seonam University Medical range of modalities, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemo- School, Jeonbuk, South Korea therapy, as first and second lines of treatment. However, many patients experience relapse after cytotoxic chemotherapy, whereas ABSTRACT they are still in a competent physical status. Gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) Gefitinib (ZD1839, Iressa) is an epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has a response rate of 10% to receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
    [Show full text]
  • Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Or ALK Inhibitors for the First Line Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Tyrosine kinase inhibitors or ALK inhibitors for the first line treatment of Non-small cell lung cancer This application seeks the addition of tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib (representative of class) and gefitinib and afatinib (alternatives) as well as ALK-inhibitor crizotinib to the list of the Essential Medicines List for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Introduction In 2013, there were approximately 1.8 million incident lung cancer cases diagnosed worldwide and approximately 1.6 million deaths from the disease (1). Lung cancer had the second highest absolute incidence globally after breast cancer, and in 93 countries was the leading cause of death from malignant disease, accounting for one fifth of the total global burden of disability- adjusted life years from cancer. Men were more likely to develop lung cancer than women, with 1 in 18 men and 1 in 51 women being diagnosed between birth and age 79 years (1). Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common form of the disease, accounting for 85–90% of all lung cancers (2)(43). For patients with resectable disease, adjuvant chemotherapy improves the absolute 5-year survival rates in Stage II and III NSCLC (9,13,65,44-47). Acceptable adjuvant chemotherapy options include etoposide/cisplatin, docetaxel/cisplatin, gemcitabine/cisplatin, pemetrexed/cisplatin, and carboplatin/paclitaxel for patients with comorbidities or unable to tolerate cisplatin. In patients with non-metastatic but inoperable NSCLC or Stage III disease, concurrent chemoradiotherapy has been shown to improve overall survival (OS) and median survival (47-53). However, most patients with NSCLC present with advanced stage disease – stage IV in particular – and half of all patients treated initially for potentially curable early-stage disease will experience recurrences with metastatic disease (3).
    [Show full text]