DOCSLIB.ORG

Imported Meat Passed for Entry in the U.S. by Country

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Imported Meat Passed for Entry in the U.S. by Country Imported Meat Passed for Entry In the U.S. by Country Agricultural Marketing Service Livestock, Poultry and Grain Market News Friday, September 24, 2021 For Reporting Period: 09/12/2021 to 09/18/2021 Metric Tons Week Number 38 Country Totals 2021 2020 Percent Current Week Year-to-Date Year-to-Date Change Argentina 416 11,101 13,107 -15% Australia 4,582 174,445 247,472 -30% Austria 4 30 11 167% Brazil 2,373 68,675 41,997 64% Canada 18,312 570,133 504,551 13% Chile 1,102 45,417 44,954 1% Costa Rica 61 5,650 8,581 -34% Croatia 92 78 18% Denmark 698 24,512 20,139 22% Finland 147 321 -54% France 30 146 57 157% Germany 98 1,848 1,956 -6% Honduras 22 1,572 -99% Hungary 214 7,284 2,750 165% Iceland 16 18 -8% Ireland 229 9,294 9,446 -2% Israel 11 1,056 1,006 5% Italy 374 10,796 6,501 66% Japan 28 795 292 172% Lithuania 13 121 184 -34% Mexico 6,775 227,659 234,483 -3% Netherlands 196 4,885 5,663 -14% New Zealand 3,308 160,912 163,892 -2% Nicaragua 1,401 45,999 49,680 -7% North Ireland 45 459 281 64% Poland 897 26,306 22,397 17% San Marino 87 743 -88% South Korea 639 15 4138% Spain 194 3,526 2,542 39% United Kingdom 117 4,936 4,323 14% Uruguay 1,002 33,132 36,654 -10% Total 45,141 1,440,120 1,425,667 1% Fresh Beef AMR/ Beef Patty Prod/ Boneless Cheek/Heart Edible Formed Head Non-Intact Other Other Non- Primals & Weekly 2021 2020 Percent Carcasses Ground Beef Trimmings Meat Cuts Offals Steaks Meat Cuts/Trim Intact Intact Cuts/Prod Subprimals Total Year-to-Date Year-to-Date Change Argentina 77 116 223 416 11,099 13,107 -15% Australia 1,104 32 383 55 24 1,131 2,729 101,126 178,260 -43% Brazil 514 183 84 781 25,448 7,507 239% Canada 368 2,299 93 2 379 185 1 12 4,351 7,689 249,124 224,011 11% Chile 181 48 278% Costa Rica 37 2 22 61 5,648 8,578 -34% France N/A Honduras 22 1,572 -99% Ireland 44 14 9 44 110 5,500 6,634 -17% Japan 28 28 791 291 172% Mexico 2 278 3,555 516 902 102 5,356 191,173 207,803 -8% Netherlands 1 N/A New Zealand 2,404 218 9 198 2,829 133,265 141,957 -6% Nicaragua 1,043 100 52 89 70 47 1,401 45,999 49,680 -7% Spain N/A Uruguay 683 161 53 105 1,002 30,772 34,487 -11% Total 370 8,481 125 4,718 1,027 185 992 98 172 6,233 22,401 800,147 873,934 -8% . Processed Beef Product with Sec Fully Cooked - Heat Treated - Heat Treated Not Heat Treated - Inhibitors Thermally Weekly 2021 2020 Percent Not Shelf Stable Not Shelf Stable Shelf Stable Shelf Stable Not Shelf Stable Processed Total Year-to-Date Year-to-Date Change Argentina N/A Australia 14 14 1,787 1,270 41% Brazil 247 423 617 1,287 34,559 26,782 29% Canada 62 91 570 1 3 726 14,797 14,516 2% Chile N/A Costa Rica N/A Denmark N/A Italy N/A Lithuania 1 1 1 9 35 -75% Mexico 8 46 55 1,533 1,486 3% New Zealand 22 22 3,088 2,906 6% Uruguay 2,186 1,979 10% Total 310 99 993 1 703 2,105 57,958 48,973 18% Fresh Pork Boneless Edible Ground Pork Other Other Non- Primals & Weekly 2021 2020 Percent AMR Trimmings Carcasses Cuts Offals Products Intact Intact Cuts Subprimals Sausage Total Year-to-Date Year-to-Date Change Brazil 305 305 8,664 7,708 12% Canada 19 874 2 662 13 579 2 5,071 5 7,226 204,065 166,817 22% Chile 48 24 73 1,648 1,190 39% Costa Rica N/A Denmark 92 53 24 353 522 18,266 14,475 26% Finland 147 321 -54% France 24 24 24 N/A Ireland 95 24 119 3,793 2,796 36% Italy N/A Mexico 79 427 156 110 14 146 932 24,673 17,521 41% Netherlands 50 50 100 3,210 4,283 -25% North Ireland 45 45 459 281 64% Poland 699 699 18,888 15,365 23% Spain 123 123 1,537 1,100 40% United Kingdom 92 92 4,544 4,323 5% Uruguay N/A Total 19 953 784 894 13 689 40 6,863 5 10,259 289,920 236,180 23% Processed Pork Not Heat Product with Fully Cooked - Heat Treated - Heat Treated Treated - Second Inhib Thermally Weekly 2021 2020 Percent Not Shelf Stable Not Shelf Stable Shelf Stable Shelf Stable Not Shelf Stable Processed Total Year-to-Date Year-to-Date Change Austria 4 4 30 11 167% Brazil 4 N/A Canada 173 528 124 14 57 896 37,140 33,900 10% Croatia 92 78 18% Denmark 20 157 177 6,246 5,664 10% France 2 2 60 13 344% Germany 46 52 98 1,848 1,956 -6% Hungary 252 168 50% Italy 68 9 297 374 10,794 6,499 66% Lithuania 11 1 12 112 148 -25% Mexico 96 33 54 16 198 3,686 3,202 15% Netherlands 138 124 11% Poland 197 197 7,417 7,031 5% San Marino 27 15 84% Spain 71 71 1,986 1,442 38% Uruguay N/A Total 591 625 198 383 57 174 2,028 69,832 60,252 16% Goat Boneless Edible Primals & Weekly 2021 2020 Percent Trimmings Carcasses Cuts Offal Other Intact Subprimals Total Year-to-Date Year-to-Date Change Australia 47 85 5 25 162 7,442 6,631 12% Mexico 42 42 944 269 251% New Zealand 15 17 32 545 402 35% Total 103 85 5 42 235 8,930 7,303 22% Lamb Boneless Edible Ground Meals/Dinners/ Other Other Primals & Weekly 2021 2020 Percent Trimmings Carcasses Cuts Offals Product Entrees Intact Non-Intact Subprimals Total Year-to-Date Year-to-Date Change Australia 17 18 811 603 1,450 51,215 43,859 17% Canada 1 1 22 31 -29% Chile 16 16 840 555 51% Iceland 16 18 -7% Mexico 76 187 -59% New Zealand 20 36 41 53 167 317 21,239 15,837 34% Northern Ireland N/A Spain N/A Uruguay 174 187 -7% Total 37 70 852 53 771 1,783 73,583 60,674 21% Mutton Boneless Corned Edible Primals & Weekly 2021 2020 Percent Trimmings Carcasses (Species) Cuts Offal Subprimals Total Year-to-Date Year-to-Date Change Australia 25 129 74 228 12,748 17,235 -26% Chile 353 190 85% New Zealand 48 48 2,135 2,033 5% Total 25 129 122 275 15,236 19,458 -22% Veal Boneless Cheek Edible Heart Meal/Dinners/ Non-Intact Other Other Primals & Weekly 2021 2020 Percent Trimmings Carcasses Meat Cuts Offal Meat Entrees Cuts Intact Non-Intact Subprimals Total Year-to-Date Year-to-Date Change Australia 98 213 -54% Canada 77 2 11 42 18 151 4,724 3,694 28% France 4 4 62 42 Mexico N/A Netherlands 8 19 70 96 1,536 1,251 23% New Zealand 60 60 635 750 -15% Uruguay N/A Total 77 66 19 19 42 88 311 7,054 5,950 19% Poultry Raw Ground, Raw Ground, RTE Poultry Fully Comminuted, or Comminuted, Raw Intact Cooked without NRTE Otherwise Otherwise or Otherwise Raw Poultry - Other Raw RTE Subsequent Processed Non-Intact Non-Intact Intact (Ducks, Geese, Intact Fully Cooked Exposure to the Thermally Weekly 2021 2020 Percent Poultry Chicken Turkey Chicken Squab) Turkey Poultry Environment Processed Total Year-to-Date Year-to-Date Change Canada 116 77 54 306 29 83 855 8 36 1,564 57,607 59,233 -3% Chile 892 18 103 1,013 42,395 42,971 -1% Israel 11 11 1,056 1,006 5% Mexico 40 27 91 36 193 5,564 4,008 39% South Korea 713 774 -8% Total 156 969 54 351 29 187 956 8 71 2,782 107,335 107,991 -1% Definitions Raw Product - Intact Raw intact beef Carcasses (including carcarss halves or quarters) Other primals and subprimals (1) (including bone in and boneless meat cuts) Beef maufacturing trimmings Beef components (including head meat, cheek meat, weasand meat) Edible offal (3) Bench trim (trimmings from animals not slaughtered at the est.) Other intact (4) Raw intact pork Other primals and subprimals (1) (including bone in and boneless meat cuts) Edible offal (3) Other intact (4) Raw intact sheep, goat Other primals and subprimals (1) (including bone in and boneless meat cuts) Edible offal (3) Other intact (4) Raw Product - Non-Intact Raw ground, comminuted, or otherwise non-intact beef Ground beef product (beef only and beef with other species) Hamburger/beef patty product (beef only and beef with other species) Fabricated steaks and other non-intact subprimals (1) (including bone in and boneless meats that are fabricated, restructured, mechanically tenderized or injected) Advanced Meat Recovery (AMR) Ammoniated beef Mechanically separated product Beef trim (derived from non-intact beef) Bench trim (derived from non-intact beef) Low temperature rendered product (includes Finely Textured Beef (FTB), Partially Defatted Chopped Beef (PDCB), or Partially Defatted Beef Fatty Tissue (PDBFT) Raw ground, comminuted, or otherwise non-intact pork Ground product Advanced Meat Recovery (AMR) Mechanically separated product Other non-intact Raw ground, comminuted, or otherwise non-intact meat (sheep, goat, combination species) Ground product Advanced Meat Recovery (AMR) Mechanically separated product Other non-intact Non Heat Treated - Self Stable, Heat Treated - Shelf Stable Raw (NRTE) otherwise processed meat NRTE processed meat (stuff and unstuffed) RTE (2) acidified/fermented meat (without cooking)-PLE RTE fermented meat (sliced and not-sliced) accourding to Lm Alternative (5) RTE fermented meat (sliced and not-sliced) not post-lethality exposed RTE (2) dried meat (PLE) RTE dried meat (sliced and not-sliced according to Lm Alternative (5) RTE dried meat (sliced and not-sliced) not post-lethality exposed RTE (2) salt-cured meat (PLE) RTE salt cured meat (sliced and not-sliced according to Lm Alternative (5) RTE salt cured meat (sliced and not-sliced) not post-lethality exposed Heat Treated but Not Fully Cooked - Not Shelf Stable Raw (NRTE) Otherwise processed meat NRTE meat products (stuffed and unstuffed) Product with Secondary Inhibitors - Not Shelf Stable RTE (2) salt-cured meat (PLE) RTE salt cured meat (sliced and not-sliced according to Lm Alternative (5) RTE salt cured meat (sliced and not-sliced) not post-lethality exposed Raw (NRTE) otherwise processed meat NRTE meat products (stuffed and unstuffed) Fully Cooked - Not Shelf Stable RTE (2) fully-cooked meat (PLE) Hot dog products according to Lm Alternative (5) Salad/spread/pate according to Lm Alternative (5) Meat + nonmeat multicomponent according to Lm Alternative (5) Sausage products Diced/shredded according to Lm Alternative (5) Patties/nuggets according to Lm Alternative (5) Other fully
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Meat, Fish and Dairy Products and the Risk of Cancer: a Summary Matrix 7 2
    Meat, fish and dairy products and the risk of cancer 2018 Contents World Cancer Research Fund Network 3 Executive summary 5 1. Meat, fish and dairy products and the risk of cancer: a summary matrix 7 2. Summary of Panel judgements 9 3. Definitions and patterns 11 3.1 Red meat 11 3.2 Processed meat 12 3.3 Foods containing haem iron 13 3.4 Fish 13 3.5 Cantonese-style salted fish 13 3.6 Grilled (broiled) or barbecued (charbroiled) meat and fish 14 3.7 Dairy products 14 3.8 Diets high in calcium 15 4. Interpretation of the evidence 16 4.1 General 16 4.2 Specific 16 5. Evidence and judgements 27 5.1 Red meat 27 5.2 Processed meat 31 5.3 Foods containing haem iron 35 5.4 Fish 36 5.5 Cantonese-style salted fish 37 5.6 Grilled (broiled) or barbecued (charbroiled) meat and fish 40 5.7 Dairy products 41 5.8 Diets high in calcium 51 5.9 Other 52 6. Comparison with the 2007 Second Expert Report 52 Acknowledgements 53 Abbreviations 57 Glossary 58 References 65 Appendix 1: Criteria for grading evidence for cancer prevention 71 Appendix 2: Mechanisms 74 Our Cancer Prevention Recommendations 79 2 Meat, fish and dairy products and the risk of cancer 2018 WORLD CANCER RESEARCH FUND NETWORK Our Vision We want to live in a world where no one develops a preventable cancer. Our Mission We champion the latest and most authoritative scientific research from around the world on cancer prevention and survival through diet, weight and physical activity, so that we can help people make informed choices to reduce their cancer risk.
    [Show full text]
  • 100195– Tuna, Chunk Light, Canned (K) Category
    100195– Tuna, Chunk Light, Canned (K) Category: Meat/Meat Alternate PRODUCT DESCRIPTION NUTRITION FACTS This item is canned tuna packed in water with Serving size: 1 ounce (28 g)/1 MMA tuna, vegetable broth. The product contains a drained commercial Kosher certification. It is delivered in cases containing six 66.5-ounce cans. Amount Per Serving Calories 30 CREDITING/YIELD Total Fat 0g One case of tuna contains about 307 servings Saturated Fat 0g of drained tuna. Trans Fat 0g CN Crediting: 1 ounce of drained tuna credits Cholesterol 15mg as 1 ounce equivalent meat/meat alternate. Sodium 130mg Total Carbohydrate 0g CULINARY TIPS AND RECIPES Dietary Fiber 0g Canned tuna can be used in salads, sandwiches, or casseroles. Sugars 0g Mix tuna with chopped vegetables, mustard, Protein 6g and a little mayo for a tasty tuna topping to put on salad, whole grain sandwiches or crackers. Source: USDA Foods Vendor Labels For more culinary techniques and recipe ideas, visit the Institute of Child Nutrition or USDA’s Allergen Information: Product contains fish and soy. Please Team Nutrition. refer to allergen statement on the outside of the product package to confirm any vendor-specific information. For more information, please contact the product manufacturer directly. FOOD SAFETY INFORMATION For more information on safe storage and Nutrient values in this section are from the USDA National cooking temperatures, and safe handling Nutrient Database for Standard Reference or are representative practices please refer to: Developing a School values from USDA Foods vendor labels. Please refer to the product’s Nutrition Facts label or ingredient list for product- Food Safety Program Based on the Process specific information.
    [Show full text]
  • Naics 311615 – Poultry Processing
    U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics PPI Product Checklist The Bureau of Labor Statistics, its employees, agents, and partner statistical This report is authorized by agencies, will use the information you provide for statistical purposes only and will law 29 U.S.C.2. Your hold the information in confidence to the full extent permitted by law. In accordance voluntary cooperation is with the Confidential Information Protection and Statistical Efficiency Act of 2002 needed to make the results of OMB No. 1220-0008 (Title 5 of Public Law 107-347) and other applicable Federal laws, your responses this survey comprehensive, will not be disclosed in identifiable form without your informed consent. accurate, and timely. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 2 hours, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and reviewing the collection of information. If you have any comments regarding this estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, please send them to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Producer Price Index Program, 1220-0008, 2 Massachusetts Avenue, N.E., Wash., DC 20212. You are not required to respond to this collection unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. SU ID: Item Num: NAICS 311615 – POULTRY PROCESSING YOUNG AND MATURE CHICKENS PAGES 2 TO 3 TURKEYS (INCLUDING FROZEN WHOLE OR PARTS) PAGES 4 TO 5 OTHER POULTRY AND SMALL GAME PAGES 6 TO 7 PROCESSED POULTRY AND SMALL GAME, (EXCEPT SOUPS) PAGES 8 TO 9 DEFINITIONS PAGES 10 TO 11 NAICS INDUSTRY DEFINITION This U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Standard Squab Book
    fk^i^T-.v^s^p>^::Ss 'pm^'k^y^'-^ •• SqUABBQDK ELMER C RIC ^m fork At ffinrntU TUniverait^ iCibrarg Cornell University Library SF 467.R49 1907 The national standard squab book, 3 1924 000 124 754 Cornell University Library The original of tiiis bool< is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924000124754 The National Standard Squab Book ' ~r ELMER C. RICE. The National Standard Squab Book By Elmer C. Rice A PRACTICAL MANUAL GIVING COMPLETE AND PRECISE DIREC- TIONS FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MANAGEMENT OF A SUC- CESSFUL SQUAB PLANT. FACTS FROM EXPERIENCES OF MANY HOW TO MAKE A PIGEON AND SQUAB BUSINESS PAY, DETAILS OF BUILDING, BUYING, HABITS OF BIRDS, MATING, WATERING, FEEDING, KILLING, COOL- "' ING, MARKETING, SHIPPING, CURING ^ y. ^""^ ^ AILMENTS, AND OTHER INFORMATION ' Illustrated with New Sketches and Half Tone Plates from Photographs Specially Made for this Work BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 1907 Copyright' ISOl, by Elmer C. Bice Copyright, i902, by Elmer C. Rice Copyright, 1903, by Kmer C. Rice Copyright, 1904, by Elmer C. Rice Copyright, 1905, by Elmer C. Rice Copjrright, 1906, by Elmer C. Rice Copyright, 1907, by Elmer C. Rice rights reserved. A WELL-BUILT NEST. Ptees of Murray and Emey Company Boston, Maaa. ILLUSTRATIONS. Page Portrait of the Author {Frontispiece) A Weil-Built Nest 8. Thoroughbreds ....... 14 How a Back Yard may be Fixed for Pigeons 18 Cheap but Practical Nest Boxes 22 How City Dwellers without Land may Breed Squabs 24 Unit Squab House (with Passageway) and Flying Pen 26 Nest Boxes Built of Lumber .
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Pigeon Feed for Commercial Squab Production in British Columbia
    DEVELOPMENT OF PIGEON FEED FOR COMMERCIAL SQUAB PRODUCTION IN BRITISH COLUMBIA BY GWENITH A. WALDIE B.Sc.(Agr.), University of British Columbia, 1982 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Animal Science) We accept, this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA 3 JULY 1986 (g^ GWENITH A. WALDIE, 1986 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia. I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of ftwiMAk Sci£Nc£ The University of British Columbia 1956 Main Mall Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Y3 DE-6 (3/81) ABSTRACT Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the protein and energy requirements of squabbing pigeons. The firBt experiment was carried out at a commercial farm, with birds housed in pens, each containing 10-12 pairs. Two pelleted feeds of different protein concentrations (low protein (LP) with l&V. CP and 2937 kcal ME/kg, and high protein (HP) with 22% CP and 2783 kcal ME/kg) were fed, with and without whole yellov corn, cafeteria-style. A low protein intake was observed with LP + corn, which adversely affected squab growth and livability, without affecting egg production traits or adult body weight.
    [Show full text]
  • Eating Less Meat
    Eating Less Meat South Durham Green Neighbors This is the fourth in a series on taking larger steps toward sustainability. You know yourself best. What would it take to get yourself to eat less meat? Are Plant-based Diets Really That Great? Yes! PlantPure Nation, a documentary on plant-based diets, makes claims about the environmental and health benefits of those diets. A check on two databases of articles, Proquest Central and Pub Med, backs up these claims. (See references below.) Note: Plant-based diets vary from complete veganism to a diet of primarily plants with small quantities of fish +/- chicken and no red meat. Environmentally, British researchers have found that the plant-based diets results in lower greenhouse gas emissions. The age-and-sex-adjusted mean GHG emissions in kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents per day (kgCO2e/day) were: 7.19 for high meat-eaters, 3.91 for fish-eaters, 5.63 for medium meat-eaters, 3.81 for vegetarians and 4.67 for low meat-eaters, 2.89 for vegans. In other words, eating lots of meat = bad, eating less or no meat = good. Medical research articles can be confusing, but by checking medical review articles you can avoid trying to make sense of lots of individual research studies. In these reviews, researchers look at all the studies they can find on a topic, check the quality of the research, and crunch the numbers to find out what the evidence really says. Below are some sources, but here’s the bottom line: Plant-based diets significantly reduce the risk of: Diabetes Obesity Hypertension Total cholesterol LDL Cholesterol Colorectal cancer Stroke When it comes to plant-based diets, what’s not to like? Creating Your Plan If you still want to eat meat, there’s an easy way to make sure you are at least not overindulging in it: Think of your plate as a circle divided roughly into quarters.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Olney Lamb & Lentil Soup Stone Ground
    DATE 11.6.19 FRANK STITT Executive Chef ZACK REDES Chef de Cuisine OYSTER BAR Oysters on the half shell (1/2 dz)* Murder Point (AL) 18 Guadalupe Special 65 Standish Shore (MA) 18 Gulf Shrimp Cocktail 14 Moon Dancer (ME) 18 Marinated Crab Claws & Ginger Sauce 23 Irish Point (PEI) 18 Red Snapper Ceviche* Shipwreck (PEI) 18 Lemon, Jalapeño, Cilantro 12 Beau Soleil (NB) 18 START RICHARD OLNEY LAMB & LENTIL SOUP Farro Piccolo, Carrots, Turnips, Celery Root, Castelines Olive Oil 10 STONE GROUND BAKED GRITS Prosciutto, Mushrooms, Thyme 16 PRIME BEEF TARTINE Grilled Sourdough, Pickled Mushrooms, Roquefort Aïoli 15 BAKED OYSTERS Chive Butter, Chanterelle Conserva, Jalapeños 18 TUNA CARPACCIO* Satsumas, Avocado, Calabrian Chili, La Boîte N.11, Cilantro 19 GRILLED SQUAB Foie Gras, Red Wine Poached Pear, Herb Salad 22 HARVEST FARM BROCCOLI Farm Egg, Fried Capers, Dijon Vinaigrette 12 CHILLED BEEF CHEEKS Celery Root Slaw, Pickled Beets, Watercress, Sauce Gribiche 13 BOIS D’ARC FARM LETTUCES Harvest Farm Beets, Spiced Pecans, Belle Meadow Radishes, Creamy Honey Vinaigrette 12 MAIN VEAL TENDERLOIN Chanterelle Mushrooms, Artichokes, Cauliflower Timbale, Sherry Pan Sauce 34 GREG ABRAMS RED SNAPPER Clam Chowder Sauce, Lardons, New Potatoes, Vermouth 33 GULF POMPANO Roasted Beet & Persimmon, Mushrooms, Grilled Red Onions, Carolina Gold Rice Pirlau 32 GRILLED DUCK BREAST Jerusalem Artichoke Purée, Escarole, PFTP Persimmons 30 JAMISON FARM LAMB SHANK Lunchbox Peppers, Caramelized Onions, Gremolata 31 COQ AU VIN Joël Robuchon Potatoes, Cipollini Onions, Mushrooms, Carrots, Red Wine Jus 30 GRILLED VENISON Sweet Potato Hash, Local Peppers, Spinach, Crispy Shallots 36 PRIME NEW YORK STRIP AU POIVRE Crushed Fingerling Potatoes, Arugula, Green Peppercorns, Brandy 42 SIDES Collard Greens 7 Crushed Fingerling Potatoes 7 Acorn Squash & Wild Rice 7 Chanterelle Mushrooms 14 *This item may be served raw, undercooked or contain an ingredient that is raw or undercooked..
    [Show full text]
  • Meat and Muscle Biology™ Introduction
    Published June 7, 2018 Meat and Muscle Biology™ Meat Science Lexicon* Dennis L. Seman1, Dustin D. Boler2, C. Chad Carr3, Michael E. Dikeman4, Casey M. Owens5, Jimmy T. Keeton6, T. Dean Pringle7, Jeffrey J. Sindelar1, Dale R. Woerner8, Amilton S. de Mello9 and Thomas H. Powell10 1University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA 2University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA 3University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA 4Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA 5University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA 6Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA 7University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA 8Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA 9University of Nevada, Reno, NV, 89557, USA 10American Meat Science Association, Champaign, IL 61820, USA *Inquiries should be sent to: [email protected] Abstract: The American Meat Science Association (AMSA) became aware of the need to develop a Meat Science Lexi- con for the standardization of various terms used in meat sciences that have been adopted by researchers in allied fields, culinary arts, journalists, health professionals, nutritionists, regulatory authorities, and consumers. Two primary catego- ries of terms were considered. The first regarding definitions of meat including related terms, e.g., “red” and “white” meat. The second regarding terms describing the processing of meat. In general, meat is defined as skeletal muscle and associated tissues derived from mammals as well as avian and aquatic species. The associated terms, especially “red” and “white” meat have been a continual source of confusion to classify meats for dietary recommendations, communicate nutrition policy, and provide medical advice, but were originally not intended for those purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish, Meat, Poultry, Dairy, and Eggs
    Fish, Meat, Poultry, Dairy, and Eggs Session 4 Background Information Tips Goals Fish, Meat, Assessment Poultry, Dairy, and Eggs In an average WEEK, how many servings Could be Needs to of these foods do you eat? Desirable improved be improved 1. Fish, including canned tuna 2+ 1 0 2. Bacon, sausage, hot dogs or cold cuts 0-2 3-4 5+ like bologna, salami, Spam™ or deli meats including turkey and beef 3. Chicken or turkey, excluding chicken or 3+ 2 0-1 turkey cold cuts On an average DAY, how many servings of these foods do you eat? 4. Red meat like roasts, steaks, stew meat, 0-1 2 3+ ribs, chops, BBQ, ham or hamburger, either alone or in dishes like meatloaf or spaghetti sauce On average, how many servings of these foods do you eat? 5. Dairy products, such as milk, cheese, and Number of servings per day _____ yogurt or Number of servings per week _____ 6. Eggs, including in cooking? Number of servings per day _____ or Number of servings per week _____ Fish, Meat, Poultry, Dairy, and Eggs 83 Fish, Meat, Background Information Poultry, Dairy, and Eggs Why Is Fish Important? Eating fish can reduce your risk for getting heart disease. Tis is because fish are high in healthy fats. How Much Fish Should I Eat? You should eat fish ofen. Try to eat fish at least once a week to help lower your chances of heart disease. What Fish Should I Eat? In deciding what fish to eat, pay attention to mercury levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Broiler Chickens
    The Life of: Broiler Chickens Chickens reared for meat are called broilers or broiler chickens. They originate from the jungle fowl of the Indian Subcontinent. The broiler industry has grown due to consumer demand for affordable poultry meat. Breeding for production traits and improved nutrition have been used to increase the weight of the breast muscle. Commercial broiler chickens are bred to be very fast growing in order to gain weight quickly. In their natural environment, chickens spend much of their time foraging for food. This means that they are highly motivated to perform species specific behaviours that are typical for chickens (natural behaviours), such as foraging, pecking, scratching and feather maintenance behaviours like preening and dust-bathing. Trees are used for perching at night to avoid predators. The life of chickens destined for meat production consists of two distinct phases. They are born in a hatchery and moved to a grow-out farm at 1 day-old. They remain here until they are heavy enough to be slaughtered. This document gives an overview of a typical broiler chicken’s life. The Hatchery The parent birds (breeder birds - see section at the end) used to produce meat chickens have their eggs removed and placed in an incubator. In the incubator, the eggs are kept under optimum atmosphere conditions and highly regulated temperatures. At 21 days, the chicks are ready to hatch, using their egg tooth to break out of their shell (in a natural situation, the mother would help with this). Chicks are precocial, meaning that immediately after hatching they are relatively mature and can walk around.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sexual Politics of Meat by Carol J. Adams
    THE SEXUAL POLITICS OF MEAT A FEMINISTVEGETARIAN CRITICAL THEORY Praise for The Sexual Politics of Meat and Carol J. Adams “A clearheaded scholar joins the ideas of two movements—vegetari- anism and feminism—and turns them into a single coherent and moral theory. Her argument is rational and persuasive. New ground—whole acres of it—is broken by Adams.” —Colman McCarthy, Washington Post Book World “Th e Sexual Politics of Meat examines the historical, gender, race, and class implications of meat culture, and makes the links between the prac tice of butchering/eating animals and the maintenance of male domi nance. Read this powerful new book and you may well become a vegetarian.” —Ms. “Adams’s work will almost surely become a ‘bible’ for feminist and pro gressive animal rights activists. Depiction of animal exploita- tion as one manifestation of a brutal patriarchal culture has been explored in two [of her] books, Th e Sexual Politics of Meat and Neither Man nor Beast: Feminism and the Defense of Animals. Adams argues that factory farming is part of a whole culture of oppression and insti- tutionalized violence. Th e treatment of animals as objects is parallel to and associated with patriarchal society’s objectifi cation of women, blacks, and other minorities in order to routinely exploit them. Adams excels in constructing unexpected juxtapositions by using the language of one kind of relationship to illuminate another. Employing poetic rather than rhetorical techniques, Adams makes powerful connec- tions that encourage readers to draw their own conclusions.” —Choice “A dynamic contribution toward creating a feminist/animal rights theory.” —Animals’ Agenda “A cohesive, passionate case linking meat-eating to the oppression of animals and women .
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Turkey's Culinary Heritage
    EXPLORING TURKEY’S CULINARY HERITAGE A LOOK THROUGH THE HISTORY, TRADITIONS AND INGREDIENTS HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF TURKISH CUISINE Turkish cuisine is considered in the top five cuisines in the world. The vast geography that the Turks have lived in the past, the various climates, the soil and living conditions have enabled Turks to develop a very rich culinary culture. TURKS IN CENTRAL ASIA Before 11th Century The diet of nomadic Turks consisted mainly on animal products sustained in their immediate environment. They also led an agrarian way of life, depended on agricultural products as well as the animals they bred, and their products. In Central Asia, there were no definite borders at the time, therefore there was a lot of interaction between different kinds of communities. Turks that lived in Central Asia, encountered different culinary traditions and ingredients that they assimilated into their own cuisine. TURKS IN CENTRAL ASIA Before 11th Century Meat Consumed Dairy Consumed . Horse meat . Butter (Horse meat is high in calories . Kumiss therefore gives energy, . Yoghurt especially used for (Yoghurt plays a very important celebratory occasions, and role within the Turkish cuisine also the beginning of and is used in many different spring.) forms) . Mutton . Goat meat . Beef TURKS IN CENTRAL ASIA Before 11th Century Yoghurt Yoghurt has a very important place in Turkish cuisine and is considered a very important staple. There are a variety of ways of using yoghurt, as well as consuming it as is. It is regarded as one of the most famous Turkish culinary contributions to the world. “Tarhana” “Tarhana” Yoghurt based soups Ayran Kurut flakes granules and stews TURKS IN CENTRAL ASIA Before 11th Century Crops Barley Rye Oats Millet Rice Wheat Main staple, used for making bread, most commonly known is “yufka.” (Yufka is the thin flat bread made with flour, salt and water and cooked on flat metal sheets.) TURKS IN CENTRAL ASIA Before 11th Century Yufka The thin flat bread, yufka, has been an important staple for the Central Asian Turks.
    [Show full text]