DOCSLIB.ORG

Agilent Technologies, Inc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Agilent Technologies, Inc Agilent Technologies, Inc. _________________________________________________________________________________ Agilent Technologies, Inc. Financial Snapshot Operating Performance Fast Facts The company reported revenue of US$XX million during the fiscal year 2011 (2011). The company's revenue grew at a CAGR of XX% during 2007–2011, with an annual growth of XX% over 2010. In 2011, the company recorded an operating margin of XX%, as against XX% in 2010. Revenue and Margins [Figure] SWOT Analysis Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Agilent Technologies, Inc. - SWOT Profile Page 1 Agilent Technologies, Inc. _________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Business Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Company Overview ................................................................................................................................................ 5 1.2 Business Description .............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Major Products and Services ................................................................................................................................. 6 2 Analysis of Key Performance Indicators ............................................................................................... 8 2.1 Five Year Snapshot: Overview of Financial and Operational Performance Indicators .......................................... 8 2.2 Key Financial Performance Indicators ................................................................................................................. 11 2.2.1 Revenue and Operating Profit ......................................................................................................................... 11 2.2.2 Operational Efficiency ...................................................................................................................................... 12 2.2.3 Solvency .......................................................................................................................................................... 13 2.2.4 Valuation .......................................................................................................................................................... 14 2.3 Competitive Benchmarking .................................................................................................................................. 15 2.3.1 Market Capitalization ....................................................................................................................................... 15 2.3.2 Efficiency .......................................................................................................................................................... 16 2.3.3 Valuation .......................................................................................................................................................... 17 2.3.4 Turnover – Inventory and Asset ....................................................................................................................... 18 2.3.5 Liquidity ............................................................................................................................................................ 19 3 Mergers & Acquisitions and Partnerships ........................................................................................... 20 3.1 M&A and Partnerships Strategy ........................................................................................................................... 20 4 Recent Developments ........................................................................................................................... 21 5 SWOT Analysis ...................................................................................................................................... 22 5.1 SWOT Analysis - Overview .................................................................................................................................. 22 5.2 Strengths .............................................................................................................................................................. 22 5.3 Weaknesses ......................................................................................................................................................... 23 5.4 Opportunities ........................................................................................................................................................ 23 5.5 Threats ................................................................................................................................................................. 23 6 Company Statement .............................................................................................................................. 24 7 History .................................................................................................................................................... 25 8 Key Employees ...................................................................................................................................... 26 9 Key Employee Biographies ................................................................................................................... 27 10 Locations and Subsidiaries .................................................................................................................. 28 10.1 Head Office .......................................................................................................................................................... 28 10.2 Other Locations and Subsidiaries ........................................................................................................................ 28 11 Appendix ................................................................................................................................................ 29 11.1 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................................... 29 11.2 Ratio Definitions ................................................................................................................................................... 29 11.3 Disclaimer ............................................................................................................................................................. 33 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Agilent Technologies, Inc. - SWOT Profile Page 2 Agilent Technologies, Inc. __________________________________________________________________________________________ List of Tables Table 1: Major Products and Services.................................................................................................................................... 6 Table 2: Key Ratios - Annual .................................................................................................................................................. 8 Table 3: Key Ratios - Interim ................................................................................................................................................ 10 Table 4: Key Capital Market Indicators ................................................................................................................................ 10 Table 5: History..................................................................................................................................................................... 25 Table 6: Key Employees ....................................................................................................................................................... 26 Table 7: Key Employee Biographies .................................................................................................................................... 27 Table 8: Subsidiaries ............................................................................................................................................................ 28 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Agilent Technologies, Inc. - SWOT Profile Page 3 Agilent Technologies, Inc. __________________________________________________________________________________________ List of Figures Figure 1: Revenue and Operating Profit ............................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 2: Operational Efficiency ........................................................................................................................................... 12 Figure 3: Solvency ................................................................................................................................................................ 13 Figure 4: Valuation ............................................................................................................................................................... 14 Figure 5: Market Capitalization ............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Comparative Analysis of Ratios
    What We Teach and What They Do: A Comparative Analysis of Ratios Dr Jennifer L. Harrison Southern Cross University, Tweed Heads, Australia Email: [email protected] Dr Anja Morton Southern Cross University, Lismore, Australia Email: [email protected] Preferred Stream: Stream 7 (Management Education and Development ) i What We Teach and What They Do: A Comparative Analysis of Ratios ABSTRACT Financial statement analysis is a skill most business/commerce bachelors’ and masters’ degree graduates will need in their workplace, irrespective of their specialisation. For this reason, most related degrees are structured so that financial statement analysis is covered in one of the compulsory first year or core subjects. As educators of future managers we have an obligation to provide our students, at this introductory level, with the opportunity to learn the latest, simple, financial statement analysis ratios. To achieve some measure of the degree to which we fulfil this obligation, a survey was carried out of the financial statement analysis chapters of Australian introductory accounting textbooks to determine the extent to which: 1. the ratios recommended in them are consistent; 2. they include the ratios recommended by Carslaw and Mills (1992) (the only other related prior research known to the authors); and 3. they include ratios used in practice. All of the textbooks surveyed recommended traditional ratios such as the current ratio, return on equity, debtors and inventory turnovers, earnings per share and debt ratio. However, cash flow ratios were found to be covered inconsistently with very limited coverage in most books surveyed. Other ratios, such as the net debt to equity ratio and net tangible asset backing, were also found to be missing, but were found to be commonly disclosed in company annual reports and were covered in other reflections of practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Top Picks
    Equity Research 29 March 2015 1Q 2015 Global Top Picks Equity Research Team Barclays Capital Inc. and/or one of its affiliates does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. This research report has been prepared in whole or in part by equity research analysts based outside the US who are not registered/qualified as research analysts with FINRA. PLEASE SEE ANALYST CERTIFICATION(S) AND IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES BEGINNING ON PAGE 153. Barclays | 1Q 2015 Global Top Picks 29 March 2015 2 Barclays | 1Q 2015 Global Top Picks FOREWORD A lot has changed since we published our last Global Top Picks in December. The plunge in oil prices and the rise in the US dollar have produced clear beneficiaries in the euro area and Japan, where monetary policy continues to be extremely supportive, providing support for further upside in stock prices. As we argue in our Global Outlook: Oil, the dollar and monetary policy: it’s all (or at least mostly) good , lower inflation as a result of lower oil prices, combined with a stronger dollar, also argues for the Fed to be more cautious about raising rates than it otherwise would have been, allowing risk assets to continue to perform well. Against this continued accommodative backdrop, we raise our price targets for continental European and Japanese equities, forecasting an additional 13% and 9% of total returns from current levels to the end of 2015, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Statement Analysis Financial Ratio Analysis Cranswick
    Financial Statement Analysis Financial Ratio Analysis Cranswick Plc is a food supplier company listed on the London Stock Exchange. The following represent ratios for the company for the year ended 31st March 2012. Investors ratios Earning per share: it measures earning attributable to equity shareholders over outstanding number of equity ordinary shareholders. Profit after tax number of outstanding shareholders 37,480,000 = = 78 48,042,086 EPS= 78pence Dividend per share: it measures dividend paid out over the number of outstanding equity shareholders. amount distributed to shareholders as dividend number of outstanding shareholders 13,700,000 = = 28.5 48,042,086 DPS= 28.5pence Price to earning ratio: it is a ratio that measures how much investors have to pay for every pound of an entity’s earning. share’s market price earning per share 805 = 75 =10.3 Dividend cover: it is a ratio of entity’s earning over dividend paid out. earning per share dividend per share 1 Financial Statement Analysis 78 = = 2.74 28.5 =2.74 times Dividend yield: it measures the actual return an investor earns from investing in an entity dividend per share *100% share price 28.5 = *100% 805 =3.5% Management ratios Management uses the following ratios to establish how an entity is efficiently utilizing its resources to generate income. Return on equity: it is a measure of how a company is using equity shareholders fund to generate profits profit after tax ∗ 100% equity shareholders fund 34,653,000 = *100% 245,932,000 =14.1% Return on capital employed: it measures how an entity is utilizing shareholders fund and long term financing to generate profit.
    [Show full text]
  • Ba7021 Security Analysis and Portfolio Management 1 Sce
    BA7021 SECURITY ANALYSIS AND PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT A Course Material on SECURITY ANALYSIS AND PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT By Mrs.V.THANGAMANI ASSISTANT PROFESSOR DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES SASURIE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING VIJAYAMANGALAM 638 056 1 SCE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES BA7021 SECURITY ANALYSIS AND PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT QUALITY CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the e-course material Subject Code : BA7021 Subject : Security Analysis and Portfolio Management Class : II Year MBA Being prepared by me and it meets the knowledge requirement of the university curriculum. Signature of the Author Name : V.THANGAMANI Designation: Assistant Professor This is to certify that the course material being prepared by Mrs.V.THANGAMANI is of adequate quality. He has referred more than five books amount them minimum one is from abroad author. Signature of HD Name: S.Arun Kumar SEAL 2 SCE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES BA7021 SECURITY ANALYSIS AND PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT CONTENTS CHAPTER TOPICS PAGE NO INVESTMENT SETTING 1.1 Financial meaning of investment 1.2 Economic meaning of Investment 7-25 1 1.3 Characteristics and objectives of Investment 1.4 Types of Investment 1.5 Investment alternatives 1.6 Choice and Evaluation 1.7 Risk and return concepts. SECURITIES MARKETS 2.1 Financial Market 2.2 Types of financial markets 2.3 Participants in financial Market 2.4 Regulatory Environment 2 2.5 Methods of floating new issues, 26-64 2.6 Book building 2.7 Role & Regulation of primary market 2.8 Stock exchanges in India BSE, OTCEI , NSE, ISE 2.9 Regulations of stock exchanges 2.10 Trading system in stock exchanges 2.11 SEBI FUNDAMENTAL ANALYSIS 3.1 Fundamental Analysis 3.2 Economic Analysis 3.3 Economic forecasting 3.4 stock Investment Decisions 3.5 Forecasting Techniques 3 3.6 Industry Analysis 65-81 3.7 Industry classification 3.8 Industry life cycle 3.9 Company Analysis 3.10Measuring Earnings 3.11 Forecasting Earnings 3.12 Applied Valuation Techniques 3.13 Graham and Dodds investor ratios.
    [Show full text]
  • ABC Company 29 Minutes ABC Company Is Considering Investing in a Machine That Costs $800,000
    Corporate Financing ABC Company 29 minutes ABC Company is considering investing in a machine that costs $800,000. The incremental pre-tax financial impacts are summarised below: Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 Investment -800,000 Sales 800,000 840,000 882,000 926,100 972,405 COGS 480,000 504,000 529,200 555,660 583,443 Expenses 80,000 84,000 88,200 92,610 97,241 Depreciation 160,000 160,000 160,000 160,000 160,000 EBIT 80,000 92,000 104,600 117,830 131,721 Interest 0 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Life of project: 5 years The machine is expected to reduce working capital requirements by $100,000 as soon as the machine is installed and starts operating. The machine is expected to be sold at the end of 5 years at an estimated salvage value of $100,000 before tax. At that time, the machine is expected to have fully depreciated for tax purposes. The tax jurisdiction levies a profits tax and capital gains tax of 25%. Required (a) Based on NPV and using an after tax cost of capital of 10%, should the company invest in this initiative? (10 marks) (b) IRR is another popular capital budgeting tool and usually gives the same result as NPV. Describe two circumstances in which IRR will give a conflicting result compared to NPV. (4 marks) (c) What is capital rationing? Describe why the profitability index method can help a company to rank investment projects in a capital rationing situation. (2 marks) (Total = 16 marks) HKICPA December 2012 478 chapter 13 Cost of capital Topic list 1 The cost of capital 3.9 Problems with applying the CAPM in 1.1 Aspects of the cost of
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Assessment of Firm Financial Performance Using Financial Ratios and Linguistic Analysis of Annual Reports
    Myšková, R., & Hájek, P. (2017). Comprehensive assessment of firm financial Journal performance using financial ratios and linguistic analysis of annual reports. Journal of International of International Studies, 10(4), 96-108. doi:10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-4/7 Studies © Foundation Comprehensive assessment of firm of International Studies, 2017 financial performance using financial © CSR, 2017 Papers Scientific ratios and linguistic analysis of annual reports Renáta Myšková Institute of Business Economics and Management, Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Pardubice Czech Republic [email protected] Petr Hájek Institute of System Engineering and Informatics, Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Pardubice, Czech Republic [email protected] Abstract. Indicators of financial performance, especially financial ratio analysis, have Received: May, 2017 become important financial decision-support information used by firm 1st Revision: management and other stakeholders to assess financial stability and growth July, 2017 potential. However, additional information may be hidden in management Accepted: October, 2017 communication. The article deals with the analysis of the annual reports of U.S. firms from both points of view, a financial one based on a set of financial ratios, DOI: and a linguistic one based on the analysis of other information presented by 10.14254/2071- firms in their annual reports. Spearman correlation coefficient is used to 8330.2017/10-4/7 compare the values of financial and linguistic indicators. For the purpose of the comprehensive assessment, novel word lists are proposed, specifically designed for each category of financial analysis. The aim is to assess the information ability of annual reports and whether successful firms present their results precisely or not.
    [Show full text]
  • MEASURING EARNINGS: A
    UNIT IV COMPANY OR CORPORATE ANALYSIS Company analysis is a study of variables that influence the future of a firm both qualitatively and quantitatively. It is a method of assessing the competitive position of a firm, its earning and profitability, the efficiency with which it operates its financial position and its future with respect to earning of its shareholders. The fundamental nature of the analysis is that each share of a company has an intrinsic value which is dependent on the company's financial performance. If the market value of a share is lower than intrinsic value as evaluated by fundamental analysis, then the share is supposed to be undervalued. The basic approach is analysed through the financial statements of an organisation. The company or corporate analysis is to be carried out to get answer for the following two questions. 1. How has the company performed in comparison with the similar company in the same Industry? 2. How has the company performed in comparison to the early years? MEASURING EARNINGS: a. Internal Information: Relating to enterprise b. External Information: Out side the company Financial Indicators:- Analyze the financial position of the company. Tools: a. Income statement It gives past records of the firm that forms a base for making predictions of the firm. b. Balance sheet It shows the assets and liabilities of a firm along with shareholder s equity c. Statement of Cash flows It shows how a company's cash balance changed from one year to the next d. Ratio Analysis It makes intra firm and inter firm comparisons.
    [Show full text]
  • Petronet LNG Running out of Gas Phillipcapital (India) Pvt
    Petronet LNG Running out of Gas PhillipCapital (India) Pvt. Ltd OIL & GAS: Company Update 28 July 2014 PLNG’s stock has appreciated ~75% from its lows on account of improved visibility on utilization of Dahej terminal (back‐to‐back contracts for Downgrade to NEUTRAL 14.5MMTPA volumes and likely ONGC contract for replacement of C2‐C3 of PLNG IN | CMP RS 184 ~0.9MMTPA) and correction in spot LNG prices to ~US$11/mmbtu (fell 20% TARGET RS 170 (‐8%) QoQ). While some hold Kochi terminal’s utilization rate could improve following any early resolution of the entangled pipeline, that would evacuate Company Data LNG from Kochi, we highlight with GAIL having already taken a write off, any O/S SHARES (MN) : 750 MARKET CAP (RSBN) : 138 amicable solution could take longer. Besides, our estimates fully captures MARKET CAP (USDBN) : 2.3 medium term upsides with 2/3/4.1 MMTPA in FY17‐19E, this coupled with 52 ‐ WK HI/LO (RS) : 190 / 103 expensive valuations turns risk‐reward unfavorable. We believe the current LIQUIDITY 3M (USDMN) : 5.9 FACE VALUE (RS) : 10 valuations are demanding and factors in all near term positives leaving little room for upside from current levels (EV/CE ~1.5x FY16). Thus, we downgrade Share Holding Pattern, % PROMOTERS : 50.0 our recommendation to ‘NEUTRAL’ from ‘BUY’ with a revised price target of FII / NRI : 32.6 Rs170/share (as we roll forward estimates to FY16 (Rs159/share earlier)). FI / MF : 3.3 NON PROMOTER CORP. HOLDINGS : 1.7 Cut utilization rate for Kochi terminal, tanker leasing unlikely to add PUBLIC & OTHERS : 12.5 significantly to earnings: As GAIL continues to face a host of issues in laying its Price Performance, % natural gas pipeline from Kochi to Mangalore and lack of solution for the same in 1mth 3mth 1yr ABS 1.5 31.1 49.2 the near term in sight, we cut our utilisation rate assumption for the Kochi REL TO BSE ‐1.7 16.0 17.2 terminal.
    [Show full text]
  • JSC Rushydro (HYDR)
    JSC RusHydro (HYDR) - Financial and Strategic SWOT Analysis Review Reference Code: GDAE37391FSA Publication Date: MAY 2013 Phone Revenue Fax Net Profit Website Employees Exchange Industry Company Overview JSC RusHydro (RusHydro) is the Russia’s largest hydro-power generating company. The mail activity of the company is to generate and sell electricity. The company operates through four segments, namely, Generation, RAO ES of East Group, Retail and Other. It holds largest position in terms of hydro-generation and second largest in terms of installed capacity. The company has an aggregate installed capacity of approximately 36.5 GW and heat capacity of 16.2 Gcal/h. RusHydro operates over 70 renewable power source facilities. RusHydro is headquartered in Krasnoyarsk, in the Russian Federation. Key Executives SWOT Analysis Name Title JSC RusHydro, SWOT Analysis Strengths Weaknesses Source: Annual Report, Company Website, Primary and Secondary Research, GlobalData Opportunities Threats Share Data JSC RusHydro Source: Annual Report, Company Website, Primary and Secondary Research, GlobalData Source: Annual Report, Company Website, Primary and Secondary Research, GlobalData Financial Performance Recent Developments Apr 29, 2013 Apr 29, 2013 Apr 24, 2013 Apr 16, 2013 Source: Annual Report, Company Website, Primary and Secondary Research, GlobalData SAMPLE Source: Annual Report, Company Website, Primary and Secondary Research, GlobalData JSC RusHydro (HYDR) - Financial and Strategic SWOT Analysis Reference Code: GDAE37391FSA Review Page 1 © GlobalData.
    [Show full text]
  • Datastream Dataypes
    Name Mnemonic Equity Datastream static Adjustment Factor AF Assoc. Market Index - Datastream INDX Assoc. Market Index - Local INDXL Beta BETA Beta (Value String Format) BETAV Beta Correlation BTAC Cash Date CASHD Cash Earnings Per Share CASH Code - Datastream DSCD Code - Datastream for euro data EDSCD Code - Datastream for national currency data NCDSCD Code - Geography Group GEOG Code - Isin ISIN Code - Local LOC Code - Sedol SECD Company Name CNAME Conv. rate of nat.currency non-price data to euro EDCNRT Conversion Rate non-EMU Accounts-BS CABSRTE Conversion Rate non-EMU Accounts-PL CAPLRTE Conversion rate of national currency data to euro EPCNRT Currency - Accounts ACUR Currency - Dividend DCUR Currency - Earnings ECUR Currency prior to the event EPCUR Current number of shares CNOSH Datastream Level 3 Mnemonic INDXEG Date - Fin.Year End Euro Accounts EFYDATE Date - Last Financial Year End LYE Date - Next Declaration NDEC Date - Non-Price Currency Change EDDATE Date of earliest euro value provided by the source SDATE Date of last name change DNMC Date of last nat. currency value from source NDATE Div. History - 10 years (10 div. per year) DY10D10 Div. History - 10 years (11 div. per year) DY10D11 Div. History - 10 years (12 div. per year) DY10D12 Div. History - 10 years (13 div. per year) DY10D13 Div. History - 10 years (14 div. per year) DY10D14 Div. Per Share (Last Fin. Year) DPSF Div. Per Share Date (Current) DPSCD Div. Per Share Date (Last Fin. Year) DPSFD Dividend Cover - Current DCV Dividend History - 10 years (15 dividends per
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamental Analysis and Relative Valuation Multiples: a Determination of Value Drivers and Development of a Value Model for the US and UK Markets
    Fundamental Analysis and Relative Valuation Multiples: A Determination of Value Drivers and Development of a Value Model for the US and UK Markets Kim Ehab Shelbaya Ali The thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Portsmouth Director of Studies: Richard Trafford August 2014 Declaration Whilst registered as a candidate for the above degree, I have not been registered for any other research award. The results and conclusions embodied in this thesis are the work of the named candidate and have not been submitted for any other academic award. Signature....................................................................................... Date................................................................................................ Word Count: 87,190 words Abstract The main objective of this study was to develop an algorithmic financial model to determine and examine the characteristics of key value drivers, earnings, net income, EBITDA, sales, and book value, that formulate the value aspects of a company to compute raw value multiples using multi-linear regression analyses of scaled value driver, Price-to-Earnings (PE), Price-to-Net_Income (PX_Earn_Com), Price-to-EBITDA (PEBITDA), Price-to-Sales (PS), and Price-to-Book (PB), against a comprehensive list of independent proxy variables. The resulting spectrum of raw value multiples is utilised in further computation that encompass the triangulation of the spectrum raw value multiples in a weighted process based on the adjusted coefficient of determination measurement, which would synthesise a raw market share price of the company (Adj. Vs_PX) comparable to Bloomberg-based share prices (PX). Effectively, the multi-linear regressive algorithmic financial model would be used for assessing market value signalling a buy or sell based on the position of synthesised market share price relative to current market share prices.
    [Show full text]
  • Stock Filter - Full List of Criteria
    Stock Filter - Full list of criteria Below is the full list of available criteria in the Stock Filter tool: Display Name Abbreviate Name Business Description Business Description Forecaster Count Forecaster Count Trading Status Trading Status Star Stock Status Star Stock Status Star Growth Stock In Price ($) SGS In Price ($) Star Growth Stock In Date SGS In Date Star Growth Stock Total Return (%) SGS Total Return (%) Price Change 1 yr cf. All Ordinaries (%) Price Chg cf. All Ords 1yr (%) Price Change 1 yr cf. ASX 100 (%) Price Chg cf. ASX 100 1yr (%) Constituent of ASX 100 ASX 100 const Constituent of ASX 20 ASX 20 const Constituent of ASX 200 ASX 200 const Constituent of ASX 300 ASX 300 const Constituent of ASX 50 ASX 50 const Constituent of ASX All Australian 200 ASX All Aust 200 const Constituent of ASX All Australian 50 ASX All Aust 50 const Constituent of ASX Mid Small ASX Mid Small const Constituent of ASX MidCap 50 ASX MidCap 50 const Constituent of ASX Small Ordinaries ASX Small Ords const Constituent of All Ordinaries Index All Ords Index const Price Change 1 yr cf. ASX 20 (%) Price Chg cf. ASX 20 1yr (%) Price Change 1 yr cf. ASX 200 (%) Price Chg cf. ASX 200 1yr (%) Price Change 1 yr cf. ASX 200 Industrials (%) Price Chg cf. ASX 200 Ind 1yr (%) Price Change 1 yr cf. ASX 100 Resources (%) Price Chg cf. ASX 200 Res 1yr (%) Price Change 1 yr cf. ASX 300 (%) Price Chg cf. ASX 300 1yr (%) Price Change 1 yr cf. ASX 50 (%) Price Chg cf.
    [Show full text]