Ac/2000/001 Truth and Reconciliation Commission

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ac/2000/001 Truth and Reconciliation Commission AC/2000/001 TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION AMNESTY COMMITTEE APPLICATION IN TERMS OF SECTION 18 OF THE PROMOTION OF NATIONAL UNITY AND RECONCILIATION ACT, NO.34 OF 1995 ______________________________________________________ TSEDISO EPHRAIM MOALOSI (AM00292/96) ______________________________________________________ DECISION ______________________________________________________ The applicant applies for amnesty for two incidents. We deal with them in the chronology of their apparent occurrence. 1. The applicant lodged an application for amnesty on the 14th January 1997 with the TRC, in which he applies for amnesty for "attempted murder" on an undisclosed date in the township of Mmamahabane, Ventersburg. The nature and particulars of the act/s are stated as follows: "As I was a member of the SAPS at that point in time at Ventersburg, one of my colleagues' house was attacked by a mob of angry residents of Mmamahabane, Ventersburg. I reported the matter to my station commander telephonically and he instructed me to attend to the matter by all means and he ordered me to make use of my pistol to save Constable Mokau's life and his entire family. I went there and one youth was shot by me". (quoted verbatim) He gives the name of the victim as "alias" Motsheare of address unknown. As political objective he states:- "Through an order from my senior I had to comply. The rules of the former government was to comply and complain later." Justification for the act as associated with a political objective is given as: "The offence was directed at the ANC and its supporters of Mmamahabane, Ventersburg. I was a member of the SAPS and I had to comply with orders. The objective was to overpower the ANC and to make their aims fruitless." The applicant was never charged. The application with others that we will alter come to, was set down for a hearing on the 22 December 1999 but after perusal of the documents removed from the roll. Notice of such removal did, however, not reach either the applicant, who had not yet arrived at the originally scheduled time, or his legal representative Ms Cambanis. Ms Cambanis, however, arrived on due time and was asked to meet with the Committee to explain that the reasons for removal from the roll were: In relation to his application for amnesty for the attempted murder of "Alias Matsheare, on the face of the application, the act seems not to be one which entails an offence, but that it appears to have been the mere execution of his civil duties as a policeman. Ms Cambanis was however invited to consult with her client and serve us with a supplementary affidavit and/or argument on this point. In relation to the second application dated 7 October 1996 it was pointed out that the application was for attempted robbery, therefore not a human rights violation as defined in the Act and capable of being dispensed with, without a hearing. On the 24th November, the Committee was furnished with a "supplementary affidavit" signed by the applicant, by Ms Cambanis, in which the applicant made the following submissions: 1. That he was in the employment of the State (Police Services). 2. That the victim was part of the African National Congress protesters who were attacking the home of a fellow policeman. 3. That the order was given by his superior, Ben van Wyk. 4. That he has been advised that his actions fall under Section 20(2)(b) of the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act. This clearly takes the matter no further than the original application for amnesty. In the above, no act or omission is disclosed which would constitute and offence. There is no disclosure of any information which points to any objective (let alone any political objective) to commit such an offence, there is no indication that the alleged order of Van Wyk was in the slightest related to the commission of an offence. What speaks from the information put before the Committee is that the applicant was indeed ordered to comply with his duties as a policeman to protect life and property and that he had the intention of doing exactly that. The fact that those who were attacking his colleague were supporters of the ANC is neither here no there. The applicant, on the facts, had no intention to commit any unlawful act and there is no indication whatsoever that Van Wyk had unlawfulness in mind when he gave the alleged order. In the affidavit furnished to the Committee by Ms Cambanis, signed by the applicant, other information is however tendered. We quote:- "I was not prosecuted for the said incident because: one of my supervisors who came to the scene, Mr Engelbrecht gave me an equivalent of the bullets that I have fired from my firearm to cover up the shooting. No statements were made about the incident to the police" Insofar as this information may (and probably does) disclose some offence, again there is no information which links this with an act associated with a political objective, but merely as one to obviate an investigation. The application for amnesty for the attempted murder of "Alias Motsheare is therefore REFUSED. 2. The second application for consideration by the Committee is dated the 7th October 1996 and concerns an attempted robbery on 26 August 1993 at the Ventersburg Municipal Police Station. The applicant states the following: "As a chosen leader of the community of Mmamahabane Township, Ventersburg, I went to the municipal police offices to take the keys of the Administrator's office from the municipal police and hand it to the people to prohibit the racist Administrator to govern the people of the township. I planned to take the keys by force if necessary. The police officers on duty, however, opened fire on us and we had to flee from the offices. We were unarmed during this attempt and allegations that we were armed and went to rob the police offices from firearms are not true." Now, it needs immediately be said that the applicant was charged for attempted robbery, convicted and sentenced to 9 years imprisonment on the 3 November 1994. On a charge of attempted murder for the same incident, the applicant was acquitted. In the same case the applicant was also charged for an attempted murder, malicious damage to property and attempted robbery of a firearm, convicted on all three charges and sentenced to imprisonment on these charges for 6 years, 8 months and two years respectively. Applicant does however not apply for amnesty for these offences. As far as the trial is concerned, the applicant's plea was one of not guilty and a total denial of all the charges against him. This includes the charge of attempted robbery, the subject matter of this application. The state lead extensive evidence commencing with a call received, at the charge office at 23h15 and another call at 00h15 the caller enquiring about the strength and names of those on duty at the charge office. Later that morning three persons entered the charge office, their faces covered with cloth and one had a balaclava and the cloth that covered his face. They were armed. They ordered those present to stand still. One of the policemen started shooting in the direction of the attackers whereupon two of them fled from the scene. Applicant remained, jumped over the counter and approached the safe. Further shots were fired by the applicant and one of the policemen. In the commotion that ensued the white cloth came off the face of the applicant and he was recognised by those present, him having had been a colleague of theirs earlier. The applicant managed to escape through a window in an adjacent storeroom. The policemen were of the opinion that the applicant was looking for firearms on the basis of his approaching the safe, where he, as an ex-policeman, knew weapons were kept. The State also lead forensic evidence related to hair monsters found at the charge office, on the balaclava and two of the cloths left at the scene. It matched that of applicant. Finger and palm prints found on the safe matched with those of applicant. The repeat button of applicant's telephone, when activated shortly after the incident, caused the call to reach the charge office. Applicant could not give an explanation. The applicant testified at the trial that at no stage on the day in question, 26 August 1993, was he in or at the Municipal Police office. He was at his parents at 21h00 and then went to sleep. That night he was awakened by the police knocking at his door. The applicant also furnished the Committee with an affidavit, dated the 9th April 1999, deposed to at Henneman. In this statement he alleges that on the 26th April he and others, eight of them in all, walked to the Transitional Council offices. None was armed. He lead with another three following directly behind him. He demanded from Constable Shuping keys to the Municipal offices. He moved around the counter to take possession of the keys. Constable Shuping started shooting above his (applicant's) head and emptied his gun. He then asked for another gun whereupon applicant left the offices. None of them was armed and they had no intention to rob the Police Station. One would have expected the applicant, if it was true, to have advanced at the trial this sequence of events. It was not illegal, honourable and clear cut. He did not. On an assessment of all the information, the finding of the Committee is that the applicant has not made a full and truthful disclosure to the Committee.
Recommended publications
  • John Keene Interviewed by Mike Cadman 19/09/07 Former Regimental Sergeant Major – Rand Light Infantry
    1 John Keene interviewed by Mike Cadman 19/09/07 Former Regimental Sergeant Major – Rand Light Infantry TAPE ONE SIDE A Interviewer Can you give me a bit of a background about how you came to be in the military, when you started, just a little sort of thumbnail sketch of your career in the military. John Keene I was born in 1946, which is nine months after the end of the Second World War. And I went to Maritz Brothers College, Inanda. My father had been in the Rand Light Infantry during the Second World War and had been badly wounded at ? My grandfather on my father’s side was a merchant navy captain and he had been responsible for landing Anzac troops in the Dardanelles during the First World War. My mother’s father came out to South Africa in Imperial Military Railways during the Anglo Boer War. So throughout my life I considered that warfare was a natural part of human existence. Through my father I knew all of his comrades in the Rand Light Infantry (RLI), and I’d formed a picture of what the army should be like. At school we were mostly English speaking boys and most of our fathers had also served in the Second World War in one or other of the arms, either the air force, the army or the navy. And the mindset that we had developed at that stage was that our fathers had fought a war for liberation of the human race and that the world offered a lot.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam War Turning Back the Clock 93 Year Old Arctic Convoy Veteran Visits Russian Ship
    Military Despatches Vol 33 March 2020 Myths and misconceptions Things we still get wrong about the Vietnam War Turning back the clock 93 year old Arctic Convoy veteran visits Russian ship Battle of Ia Drang First battle between the Americans and NVA For the military enthusiast CONTENTS March 2020 Click on any video below to view How much do you know about movie theme songs? Take our quiz and find out. Hipe’s Wouter de The old South African Page 14 Goede interviews former Defence Force used 28’s gang boss David a mixture of English, South Vietnamese Williams. Afrikaans, slang and techno-speak that few Special Forces outside the military could hope to under- stand. Some of the terms Features 32 were humorous, some Weapons and equipment were clever, while others 6 We look at some of the uniforms were downright crude. Ten myths about Vietnam and equipment used by the US Marine Corps in Vietnam dur- Although it ended almost 45 ing the 1960s years ago, there are still many Part of Hipe’s “On the myths and misconceptions 34 couch” series, this is an about the Vietnam War. We A matter of survival 26 interview with one of look at ten myths and miscon- This month we look at fish and author Herman Charles ceptions. ‘Mad Mike’ dies aged 100 fishing for survival. Bosman’s most famous 20 Michael “Mad Mike” Hoare, characters, Oom Schalk widely considered one of the 30 Turning back the clock Ranks Lourens. Hipe spent time in world’s best known mercenary, A taxi driver was shot When the Russian missile cruis- has died aged 100.
    [Show full text]
  • 42917 20-12 Legala
    Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA December Vol. 654 Pretoria, 20 2019 Desember No. 42917 LEGAL NOTICES A WETLIKE KENNISGEWINGS ISSN 1682-5843 N.B. The Government Printing Works will 42917 not be held responsible for the quality of “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes 9 771682 584003 AIDS HELPLINE: 0800-0123-22 Prevention is the cure 2 No. 42917 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 20 DECEMBER 2019 IMPORTANT NOTICE OF OFFICE RELOCATION Private Bag X85, PRETORIA, 0001 149 Bosman Street, PRETORIA Tel: 012 748 6197, Website: www.gpwonline.co.za URGENT NOTICE TO OUR VALUED CUSTOMERS: PUBLICATIONS OFFICE’S RELOCATION HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY SUSPENDED. Please be advised that the GPW Publications office will no longer move to 88 Visagie Street as indicated in the previous notices. The move has been suspended due to the fact that the new building in 88 Visagie Street is not ready for occupation yet. We will later on issue another notice informing you of the new date of relocation. We are doing everything possible to ensure that our service to you is not disrupted. As things stand, we will continue providing you with our normal service from the current location at 196 Paul Kruger Street, Masada building. Customers who seek further information and or have any questions or concerns are free to contact us through telephone 012 748 6066 or email Ms Maureen Toka at [email protected] or cell phone at 082 859 4910. Please note that you will still be able to download gazettes free of charge from our website www.gpwonline.co.za.
    [Show full text]
  • Defence Dangerous Object
    work within the system could be defined as a national key point, Mr Myburgh said.4 In May the Control of Access to Public Premises and Vehicles Act of 1985 was gazetted by the state president.' It granted the owners of public premises or vehicles wide powers for the safeguarding of those premises and vehicles. A person authorised by the owner of any public premises or public vehicle may, for SECURITY instance, require of a person who wants to enter such premises or vehicle that he/she subject himself/herself, or anything in his/her possession to an examination by an electronic or other apparatus in order to determine the presence of any Defence dangerous object. In terms of the act. powers of search and the authority to demand identification are given. The only qualification was that physical searches In November the minister of defence, Mr Magnus Malan, was handed the report of women be done by women. of the committee of inquiry set up in May 1984 under the chairmanship of the chicf On 13 December the state president, Mr P W Botha, amended the general of the army, Lieutenant General Jannie Geidenhuys, to investigate the South regulations promulgated under the Defence Act of 1957 by the addition of a new African Defence Force (SADF) and related aspects affecting the Armaments chapter to increase the powers of the South African Defence Force (SADF) in Corporation of South Africa (ARMSCOR) in the context of the economic situations of internal unrest. Regulation 1 provided that the SADF might be used situation and the future needs of the country (the Geidenhuys committee).
    [Show full text]
  • 35692 21-9 Legalap1 Layout 1
    Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA Vol. 567 Pretoria, 21 September 2012 No. 35692 PART 1 OF 2 LEGAL NOTICES A WETLIKE KENNISGEWINGS N.B. The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for the quality of “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes AIDS HELPLINE: 0800-0123-22 Prevention is the cure G12-094626—A 35692—1 2 No. 35692 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 21 SEPTEMBER 2012 IMPORTANT NOTICE The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for faxed documents not received due to errors on the fax machine or faxes received which are unclear or incomplete. Please be advised that an “OK” slip, received from a fax machine, will not be accepted as proof that documents were received by the GPW for printing. If documents are faxed to the GPW it will be the sender’s respon- sibility to phone and confirm that the documents were received in good order. Furthermore the Government Printing Works will also not be held responsible for cancellations and amendments which have not been done on original documents received from clients. TABLE OF CONTENTS LEGAL NOTICES Page BUSINESS NOTICES.............................................................................................................................................. 11 Gauteng..................................................................................................................................................... 11 Eastern Cape............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Gazette A
    Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA February Vol. 620 Pretoria, 17 2017 Februarie No. 40619 PART 1 OF 2 LEGAL NOTICES A WETLIKE KENNISGEWINGS ISSN 1682-5843 N.B. The Government Printing Works will 40619 not be held responsible for the quality of “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes 9 771682 584003 AIDS HELPLINE: 0800-0123-22 Prevention is the cure 2 No. 40619 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 17 FEBRUARY 2017 IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING WORKS WILL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ERRORS THAT MIGHT OCCUR DUE TO THE SUBMISSION OF INCOMPLETE / INCORRECT / ILLEGIBLE COPY. NO FUTURE QUERIES WILL BE HANDLED IN CONNECTION WITH THE ABOVE. Table of Contents LEGAL NOTICES BUSINESS NOTICES • BESIGHEIDSKENNISGEWINGS Gauteng ....................................................................................................................................... 13 Free State / Vrystaat ........................................................................................................................ 13 KwaZulu-Natal ................................................................................................................................ 13 North West / Noordwes ..................................................................................................................... 14 Western Cape / Wes-Kaap ................................................................................................................ 14 COMPANY NOTICES • MAATSKAPPYKENNISGEWINGS Gauteng
    [Show full text]
  • Responsibility and Accountability in Theory and Practice
    Responsibility and accountability in theory and practice: The Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s investigation of human rights abuse in South Africa Marina Carman B.A. (Hons.) Sydney A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. University of New South Wales. July, 2005. ABSTRACT The main aims of the investigation conducted here are to draw out important debates in theory and in the South African social context over the concepts of responsibility and accountability for human rights abuse, and to look at how these were present within, and impacted on, discussions within and around the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. The TRC did not specifically discuss or define theoretical concepts of responsibility or accountability. However, I argue that it is possible to draw out some important features of its implicit approach – particularly in terms of its emphasis on collective responsibility and social context (in addition to individual responsibility), and its emphasis on moral arguments for individuals and collectives to accept responsibility and hold themselves accountable by contributing to future change. This ambitious and complex approach raised some important theoretical issues, which have been discussed and debated in the theoretical literature. These include: the relationship between individual responsibility, collective responsibility and the influence of “the system”; the nature of collective responsibility; the nature of morality; the distinction between moral and political responsibility; and how individuals and collectives can or should be held accountable. In South Africa, these theoretical debates inter-mingled with a range of other factors, including individual and collective interests, motives and political perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Music and Militarisation During the Period of the South African Border War (1966-1989): Perspectives from Paratus
    Music and Militarisation during the period of the South African Border War (1966-1989): Perspectives from Paratus Martha Susanna de Jongh Dissertation presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Professor Stephanus Muller Co-supervisor: Professor Ian van der Waag December 2020 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this dissertation electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (unless to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: 29 July 2020 Copyright © 2020 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved i Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract In the absence of literature of the kind, this study addresses the role of music in militarising South African society during the time of the South African Border War (1966-1989). The War on the border between Namibia and Angola took place against the backdrop of the Cold War, during which the apartheid South African government believed that it had to protect the last remnants of Western civilization on the African continent against the communist onslaught. Civilians were made aware of this perceived threat through various civilian and military channels, which included the media, education and the private business sector. The involvement of these civilian sectors in the military resulted in the increasing militarisation of South African society through the blurring of boundaries between the civilian and the military.
    [Show full text]
  • South African Army, 3 September 1939
    South African Army 3 September 1939 - July 1940 Defence Headquarters: Pretoria, Transvaal Cape Command: HQ The Castle, Capetown, Cape Province A. Permanent Force Cape Detachment, The Special Service Battalion: Capetown No. 1 Anti-Aircraft Artillery Battery: Bamboevlei, Wynberg (South African Permanent Force and University of Cape Town Active Citizen Force) The Coast Artillery Brigade: HQ The Castle, Capetown 2 Sections of Cape Garrison Artillery designated as Engineers and Signals: Capetown 1st Heavy Battery: Capetown (Composite Battery of Cape Garrison Artillery and South African Permanent Garrison Artillery)(Wynard Battery): Table Bay 2nd Heavy Battery: Simonstown (Composite Battery of Cape Garrison Artillery and South African Permanent Garrison Artillery)(Queen's Battery): Simonstown 1st Medium Battery: Capetown (Composite Battery of Cape Garrison Artillery and South African Permanent Garrison Artillery) 2nd Medium Battery: Capetown (Composite Battery of Cape Garrison Artillery and South African Permanent Garrison Artillery) No. 1 Armoured Train: Capetown (An Active Citizen Force unit with Permanent Force nucleus) The Cape Field Artillery (Prince Albert's Own): Capetown (An Active Citizen Force unit with Permanent Force nucleus) B. Active Citizen Force 3rd Infantry Brigade: HQ Capetown The Duke of Edinburgh's Own Rifles: Capetown The Cape Town Highlanders (The Duke of Connaught and Strathearn's Own): Capetown The Kimberley Regiment: Kimberley 3rd Field Company, South African Engineer Corps: Capetown 8th Infantry Brigade: HQ Oudtshoorn Regiment Westelike Provinsie: Stellenbosch Regiment Suid-Westelike Distrikte: Oudtshoorn Die Middellandse Regiment: Graff-Reinet 8th Field Company, South African Engineer Corps: Capetown 1 Eastern Province Command: HQ East London, Cape Province A. Permanent Force 5th Heavy Battery, South African Permanent Garrison Artillery: East London 6th Heavy Battery, South African Permanent Garrison Artillery: Port Elizabeth B.
    [Show full text]
  • African National Congress Statement to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission
    African National Congress Statement to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission August 1996 Contents Executive Summary ANC Statement to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission 1. PREFACE 2. INTRODUCTION 3. THE HISTORICAL AND INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT 3.1 The prehistory of colonialism, dispossession and segregation 3.2 The history of the ANC to 1960 3.3 Just struggle in the international context 3.4 Apartheid and human rights 3.5 Apartheid human rights violations in an international context 4. THE NATIONAL PARTY, APARTHEID AND THE ANATOMY OF REPRESSION, 1948-1994 4.1 The post-1948 legislative programme of apartheid 4.2 The repressive apartheid security state, 1960-1974 4.3 The institutional violence and social consequences of apartheid 4.4 Judiciary and other forms of repression 4.5 Forced removals and forced incorporation 4.6 Mass repression by the regime in response to mass protests against apartheid 4.7 The height of apartheid repression 4.8 Apartheid and the destabilisation of Southern African countries in the 1980s 4.9 Covert action and state sanctioned gross violations of human rights in the negotiations era of the 1990s 5. PHASES OF STRUGGLE AND ANC POLICY FOUNDATIONS, 1960-1994 5.1 New forms of struggle after Sharpeville and the banning of opposition groups (1960-1969) 5.2 A changing scenario and new challenges (1969-1979) 5.3 Towards "People's War" and "People's Power" (1979-1990) 5.4 The ANC and internal revolt: The role of the Mass Democratic Movement in the 1980s 6. DID THE ANC PERPETRATE ANY GROSS VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS? 6.1 The approach, standards and conduct of the ANC in relation to human rights 6.2 Armed operations and civilian casualties 6.3 Excesses in relation to state agents 6.4 ANC members who died in exile 6.5 The Mass Democratic Movement and excesses in the mass revolt of the 1980s 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaplan Auctions 115 Dunottar Street, Sydenham, 2192, Johannesburg Po Box 28913, Sandringham, 2131, R.S.A
    KAPLAN AUCTIONS 115 DUNOTTAR STREET, SYDENHAM, 2192, JOHANNESBURG PO BOX 28913, SANDRINGHAM, 2131, R.S.A. TEL: +27 11 640 6325 / 485 2195 FAX: +27 11 640 3427 E-MAIL ADDRESS: [email protected] and [email protected] Please insist on a reply. WEBSITE ADDRESS: www.aleckaplan.co.za AUCTION B81 SALE OF MEDALS, BADGES, MILITARIA & COINS th 29 MARCH 2017 TO BE HELD 06:00 PM AT OUR PREMISES – 115 DUNOTTAR STREET, SYDENHAM, 2192 JOHANNESBURG THE LOTS WILL BE ON VIEW AT OUR PREMISES –ONLY BY APPOINTMENT. BIDDING PROCEDURE NO BIDS WILL BE ACCEPTED AFTER 12 NOON ON DAY OF AUCTION NO BIDS WILL BE PLACED WITHOUT COPY OF IDENTITY DOCUMENT 1. The Auctioneer’s decision is final. 2. Please ensure that you quote the correct lot number and recipient’s name when bidding by post. Mistakes will not be corrected after the sale. 3. This is a live auction and bids may be submitted in writing by fax, letter or e-mail, for those who cannot attend in person. 4. All items will be sold to the highest bidder. 5. Reserves have been fixed by the seller but should a reserve, in the opinion of a possible buyer be too high, I will be pleased to submit a reasonable offer to the seller, should the lot otherwise be unsold. 6. Lots have been carefully graded. Should anyone not be satisfied with the grading, such an item may be returned to us within 7 days of receipt thereof. Your payment will be refunded immediately after the goods have been received.
    [Show full text]
  • Race Relations
    file:///G|/ProjWip/Products/Omalley/Tim/03%20Pre-Transition/The%2...partheid%20State/T_SAIRR%201948-1990/SAIRR%20Survey%201987-88.HTM RACE RELATIONS SURVEY 1987/88 CAROLE COOPER JENNIFER SHINDLER COLLEEN McCAUL ROBIN HAMILTON MARY BEALE ALISON CLEMANS LOU-MARIÉ KRUGER MICHAEL MARKOVITZ JON-MARC SEIMON PIERRE BROUARD GLEN SHELTON Research staff South African Institute of Race Relations SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF RACE RELATIONS JOHANNESBURG 1988 file:///G|/ProjWip/Products/Omalley/Tim/03%20Pre...T_SAIRR%201948-1990/SAIRR%20Survey%201987-88.HTM (1 of 1277)25/11/2004 15:53:50 PM file:///G|/ProjWip/Products/Omalley/Tim/03%20Pre-Transition/The%2...partheid%20State/T_SAIRR%201948-1990/SAIRR%20Survey%201987-88.HTM Published by the South African Institute of Race Relations Auden House, 68 De Korte Street Braamfontein, Johannesburg, 2001 South Africa Copyright South African Institute of Race Relations PD 14/88 ISBN 0-86982-341-8 ISSN 0258-7246 Printed by Galvin & Sales Cape Town PREFACE This is the 52nd annual Race Relations Survey to be published. Previous Surveys concentrated only on the year preceding publication but this volume deals with both the present and the previous year. It covers the whole of 1987 and as much information about 1988 as could be included. Since different chapters are written at different times, some are more up to date than others. The Overview in particular not only describes some of the events of 1987, but also includes major developments up to about the middle of September 1988. The time lag between when events occurred and the date of publication has thus been substantially reduced, an improvement made possible by the introduction this year of desk-top publishing at the Institute.
    [Show full text]