• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Field Studies, 9, (1999) 531-546 . Vlaams instituut voor ds Flanders Marina Instituts Oz ¿O Öo o/ 6/ THE SEA EMPRESS INCIDENT AND THE LIMPETS OF FRENCHMAN’S STEPS JOHN ARCHER-THOMSON FSC at Dale Fon Field Centre, Haverfordwest, Pembrokeshire UK. SA62 3RD A b s t r a c t Oil spilled from the tanker Sea Empress into Milford Haven in February 1996 appeared, in April 1996 to have severely affected the limpet population at Frenchman’s Steps. Overall densities were lower than in previous years, with especially noticeable declines in smaller size classes on the lower half of the shore. As a result, the modal size for the population rose from die 10-14.9mm to the 15-19.9mm bracket. Data collected in July and October 1996 showed the population recovering and densities approached normality in April 1997. Such a rapid recovery suggests recruitment into die ‘visible population’ from arrested-growth juveniles from earlier ) ears that survived the oil in deep crevices. Successful settlement of spat in the winter of 1997/98 saw the population structure return to normality, with die modal size class back at 10-14.9mm, in April 1998. I ntroduction Dale Fort lies at the tip of a small promontory on the south side of Dale Roads, near the mouth of the Milford Haven. Frenchman’s Steps is the only place along the shores of Dale Roads, between the Fort and Dale village, where it is possible to land and climb the low cliff (Fig. 1). They were reputedly used by the crews of French crabbers, coming ashore to sell some of their catch in exchange for provisions. Dale Fort Field Centre was established in 1947 and its adjacent rocky shores rapidly became well-known sites for the study of rocky shore organisms and inspired the production of Collins Pocket Guide to the Seashore (Barrett & Yonge, 1958). W ithin a decade, interest concentrated on zonation patterns and their variation in response to differing levels of wave action. These shores are the type location for Ballantine’s (1961) Biologically-defined exposure scale fo r the comparative description of rocky shores. Moyse & Nelson-Smith (1963) described the zonation patterns before the 1963 cold winter and the advent of the oil industry. Fears about the effects of oil pollution on the shores of Milford Haven have been voiced for forty years (see, Dudley, 1968, in response). There have been many small-scale incidents - some of which provided material for research projects (e.g., Petpiroon & Dicks, 1982) / teaching exercises (Iball & Crump, 1982) - and two or three more serious ones1. But nothing had prepared the local authorities, let alone FSC staff, for an event on the scale of the Sea Empress spill in 1996. Limpets of the genus Patella are, arguably, the most important organisms on European rocky shores for it is their differential grazing activities that produce the patterns used by Ballantine in his exposure scale. It follows that anything which affects the distribution or abundance of limpets has far-reaching effects on the sea shore as a whole. At Frenchman’s Steps, the com m on lim pet is Patella vulgata L. 1 The second of which, Chryssi P. Goulandris on 13th January 1967, had two long-lasting effects for It w as directly responsible for Eric Cowell founding of the Oil Pollution Research Unit at Orielton Field Centre (see Baker, 1987, and Dicks, 1987) and, m ost significantly for Sea Empress, the ban on dam aged, leaking tankers entering the Port of Milford Haven. (Ed.) 531 532 J o h n A r c h e r - T h o m s o n T h e I n c i d e n t T h e Sea Empress released approximately 72,000 tonnes of Forties Blend crude oil and about 360 tonnes of heavy fuel oil in the period 15th to the 21st February 1996, when it grounded near the mouth of the Alilford Haven waterway and while it w as on an oil refinery jetty. Some more oil leaked when it was on passage to Belfast. The tanker grounded on Thursday the 15th of February, at approximately 20.07 hours, in calm weather, one and a half hours before low water. The weather remained calm while various parties prevaricated over whether to pump oil off then and there, take the tanker into the protected waters of the Haven or tow her out to sea, away from one of Britain’s most important marine wildlife sanctuaries, thereby minimising the potential environmental impact. Meanwhile the tanker remained where it was, leaking oil. Two days later, gale force winds broke the tug lines and anchor chains and the vessel was impaled on the rocks near St. Ann’s Head. Between the 17th and 21st of February, a number of spectacularly unsuccessful attempts were made to do something positive about what was rapidly becoming an environmental catastrophe. On the evening high tide of the 21st, the Sea Empress was re-floated and transferred to a jetty inside the Haven, where she continued to leak oil. On Saturday the 24th of February, nine days after the initial incident and after 70,000 tonnes of oil had been lost, pumping was finally started to remove the remaining oil from the vessel. The incident was the subject of a Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB) enquiry. Many people feei that the extent of the disaster was enough to justify a full Public Enquiry. C h e m ic a l D e t a il s o f t i -i e O il Sea Empress was carrying Forties Blend, a blend of crude oils which feed into the Forties pipeline in the N orth Sea. This a light oil and at least one third would be expected to evaporate from the sea during the first 24 hours. The oil rapidly combined with water to form a 70% water-in-oil emulsion or “Mousse”. This combination of 70% water and 30% oil will, inevitably, have more than three times the original volume of the oil. Emulsification, as a process, is sensitive to weather conditions at the time of the spill and the subsequent sea state. T h e heavy fuel oil is, as its name suggests, a heavier form o f refined oil used to power the ship. It is m ore viscous than the crude oil and so neither evaporates, disperses nor forms an emulsion very readily. It is far more persistent in the environment and much more resistant to natural and human clean-up processes; therefore, its impact has been far greater than the small volume would suggest. T h e E f f e c t s o f O il o n R o c k y S e a S h o r e s The vulnerability of a rocky shore to oil pollution depends on its topography, composition, exposure to wave action and geographical location. Other variables include the type of oil, and therefore it’s toxicity and viscosity, how much was spilt, die season and weather at the time of the spill, the duration of exposure to the oil - which, in turn, will depend on local current conditions, tidal height and position on the shore. Any attempt to write about the effect of oil on rock)’ shores leads to over simplification. It is still, however, possible to make some generalisations. Wave-exposed rock}’ shores tend to self-clean more rapidly than sheltered ones. It is possible for an exposed rock}- shore to have no visible traces of oil left after as little as two years; very sheltered shores may still have oil remaining more than twelve years after the original spill (Moore & Guzman, 1995). Brown seaweeds are relatively insensitive to oil due to the slimy mucilage which coats all their surfaces. Even after heavy oiling, most of these seaweeds are washed clean and remain largely undamaged. (They are more likely to be damaged by dispersants - see Boney, 1968). Sea Empress and the limpets o f Frenchman’s Steps 533 ST. BRIDES BAY N orth H aven Musselwick / PEMBROKESHIRE <>—-^w-^—^ S an d s ) River Gann SKOMER ^ vX t n . MILFORD GATEHOLM < ? M a rlo e sW ... HAVEN S a n d s ) DALE ROADS DALE r D ale P o in t PENINSULA MILFORD HAVEN SKOKHOLM 0 West Angle Bay Frenchm an' S t. A nn's S tep s Head CELTIC SEA CASTLEMARTIN PENINSULA MILES FlG . 1. The entrance to Milford Haven, showing some of the places mentioned in the text. Barnacles and inter-tidal anemones are, typically, only killed after being smothered with oil for more than one tidal cycle. Limpets, periwinkles, topshells and other grazing molluscs are usually more susceptible and toxic oil may kill large numbers of them. Death may either be a direct effect of the oil or the animals may be narcotised, thereby losing their grip on the rocks which in turn makes them vulnerable to predation and desiccation. (For more detail see Archer-Thomson, 1979.) The removal of large numbers of grazing herbivores is often followed by a rapid proliferation of green algae which cover the rocks with a “green flush”. This is a characteristic sign of a stressed rocky shore community and typical of the first signs of recovery after oil pollution (see Crump, Morley & Williams, 1998). As long as the shore is not contaminated with more oil, the spores of macroalgae will settle and the short-term result is often a seaweed- dominated shore. Subsequently, juvenile limpets and other snails, benefiting greatly from the increased food supply, will soon colonise the site and gradually repopulate the vacant areas.

Load more

  16

Copy Link