Contracts in General

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Contracts in General CHAPTER 12 Contracts in General The soviet law of contracts evolved from the efforts of the soviet legislators and jurists to use within the framework of socialist economy the concept of contract as developed in the civil law countries. Therefore, a person schooled in Anglo-American legal theory must be prepared to sustain a double handicap in studying the soviet law of contracts. On the one hand, the Con­ tinental European law of contracts, which is the start­ ing point of the development of the soviet theory of contract, deviates from basic concepts of Anglo-Ameri­ can law. On the other hand, the notion of a contract as outlined in the Civil Code no longer covers, in reality, all ramifications of contract in soviet law, in particular contracts between government agencies engaged in in­ dustry and commerce. But the concepts implied in the provisions of the Civil Code have not been totally aban­ doned, and it seems appropriate, therefore, to begin with a consideration of those concepts. 1. Legal Transactions and Contracts ln outlining the law of contracts, the framers of the soviet Civil Code followed certain theoretical construc­ tions of European law, of German law in particular, as developed by Professors Shershenevich, Gambarov, and Korkunov, the Russian prerevolutionary legal writers of renown. 1 Since these constructions have been taken 1 Shershenevich, 1 Textbook of the Russian Civil Law (in Russian 11th ed. 1915) 86, 190; Gambarov, 1 Course in Civil Law (in Russian 1911) 632; Korkunov, General Theory of Law (in Russian 7th ed. 1907) 161 et seq., English translation by Hastings ( 1922) 167 et seq. 415 416 SPECIAL TOPICS over by soviet jurisprudence,2 they are stated here in brief ; this will also explain the terminology and arrange­ ment of the provisions on the law of contracts and torts in the soviet Civil Code. Events capable of producing legal effects (legal facts) are visualized as being either events independent of the will of persons whose rights or duties they affect­ events in a narrow sense-or human acts. Thus, death which opens succession, the burning of an insured build­ ing which gives rise to the claim for insurance, lapse of time which bars a suit-all are legal events in a narrow sense. Now, human acts may be undertaken without the intention to cause the effect which the law neverthe­ less attaches to it, or may be expressly directed towards causing a certain legal consequence, to which intention the law may give full effect. Contracts fall among such human acts as are directly designed to bring about cer­ tain legal effects, viz., to establish, modify, or terminate rights and obligations. But while a contract requires at least two contracting parties, a concurrence of at least two wills, there are instances where the expression of a single will is under the law sufficient by itself to pro­ duce legal consequences. Thus, notice by the landlord terminates his relation with the tenant occupying prem­ ises under a lease for an indefinite period; renunciation by the heir of his share extinguishes his succession rights. In other instances, a unilateral expression of a single will produces the contemplated legal effect only if accompanied by a legal event. This is the case of a testament which produces its effect-testate succession 2 Agarkov, "The Concept of a Legal Transaction un<ler the Soviet Law" (in Russian 1946) Soviet State No. 3/4, 41 et seq.; 1 Civil Law Textbook (1938) 138; 1 Civil Law (1944) 62-72, 89; Zimeleva, Civil Law (1945) 11-12, 45. CONTRACTS IN GENERAL 417 --only upon the death of the testator. While, in the Anglo-American law, contracts are not combined with such legally relevant expressions of a single will under a generic concept, the doctrine of the civil law, followed by the soviet law, employs a generic expression serving this purpose. Thus, "legal transaction" (negotium iuris) 3 is a generic term designed to unite, as two species, both contract as the legally relevant concurrence of at least two wills and the legally effective expres­ sion of a single will! The terms bilateral and unilateral are used in this connection, in Section 26 of the soviet 3 Rechtsgeschiift is the term used in the German Civil Code; the term acte juridique is used by the French legal writers Planiol. Colin et Capitant, Josserand, Demogue. See especially Saleilles, Declaration de Volante (1906). 4 There are human acts other than legal transactions that cause legal con­ sequences. Characteristic of a legal transaction, and contract in particular, is that the parties to it directly desire the legal effect flowing therefrom. Vendor and purchaser seek to transfer title; the testator to bequeath his property. But in some instances, the law attaches to an act a consequence not contemplated by the actor. This is true of an unlawful act (tort), be­ cause, although the tortfeasor may have intended to inflict the injury, he probably did not desire to bring about the legal consequence thereof, viz., his liability for damages. The effect not intended may also result by opera­ tion of law from a lawful act. Thus, under the soviet law, a finder of lost property acquires, by the act of finding, a right to remuneration (Section 64 et seq.). The author of a work of art acquires copyright by the fact of its creation. Moreover, acts of public authorities (administrative acts) and certain kinds of judicial decisions establish private rights and obligations. The soviet textbook of 1944 emphasizes that "under the planned socialist economy, administrative acts as bases of civil legal relations are of great importance." (1 Civil Law (1944) 65). Thus, the variety of legally rele­ vant facts may be presented in the following scheme, partly derived from the soviet textbook ( id.) : Legally relevant facts are either events independent of human will (legal events) or human acts. Human acts are either lawful or unlawful. Lawful acts embrace (a) legal transactions which may be either unilateral or bilateral, called contracts; (b) acts of authorities, administrative or judicial; and (c) unintentional acts which result in legal consequences by operation of law. Unlawful acts may result only in punishment or in liability for damages or in both. When treated from the point of view of damages, they are torts. [Soviet Law]-27 418 SPECIAL TOPICS Code in particular, in a meaning somewhat different from that of the Anglo-American law, viz., to denofe whether two wills or a single will is the constitutive ele-:­ ment of a legal transaction. A legal transaction formed by a single will (e.g., testament, notice, renunciation of a right) is called unilateral, while contracts formed by the. meeting of at least two minds are called bilateral legal transactions. But, as in Anglo-American law, contracts themselves are subdivided into bilateral con­ tracts, in which the obligations of both parties are mutual, and unilateral contracts, under which all the obligations arise for one party and all the rights for the other.6 Thus, the term bilateral is applied to a legal transaction to denote simply a contract of any kind, while, when applied to a contract, it denotes a contract establishing mutual obligations of both parties thereto (e.g., sale). 2. Law of Contracts in the Civil Code Visualizing contracts as a species of the generic con­ cept of legal transaction, the framers of the soviet Civil Code covered a portion of the law of contracts by a body of general provisions equally applicable to all legal trans­ actions, including contracts (Sections 26-43), and placed these provisions in the introductory General Part of the Code. Here such subject matters are treated as form (Sections 27-29), illegality (Section 30), capacity (Sec:. tion 31), duress (Section 32), necessity (Section 33), pretended transactions (Sections 34-35), invalid~ty (Sections 36-37), contracts made through an agent (Sections 38-40), and conditions (Sections 41-43). Of all these provisions, only those of Section 30 depart from r. Civil Code, Section 139, Note. [Soviet Law] CONTRACTS IN GENERAL 419 the standards of nonsoviet laws; these are discussed· infra under 5. Unilateral legal transactions play a smaller role than contracts, and therefore the impor­ t;mce of these provisions lies mainly in the fact that they are part of the soviet law of contracts. But another part of the Civil Code must also be examined to obtain a complete picture of the provisions governing the law of contracts. The framers of the Code segregated into a separate part of the Code, under the heading Law of Obligations, provisions dealing with obligations in gen­ eral, regardless of the grounds from which they ar.ise, whether contract, tort, or any other (Sections 106-129), general provisions concerning obligations arising from contracts (Sections 130-151 ) , provisions respecting in-· dividual contracts, viz., lease, sale, barter, loan, inde­ pendent contracting, suretyship, agency, power of at­ torney, contract of commission, partnership, and insurance.6 A separate chapter in the same part deals with unjust enrichment and another with torts.7 Thus. with the exception of these two chapters, the whole of the Law of Obligations deals in fact with the law of. contracts. 3. Obligations Arising from Contract The Civil Code defines contract in conjunction with legal transactions in general. The pertinent section reads as follows: 26. Legal transactions, that is to say, acts intended to estab­ lish, modify, or terminate civil legal relations may be uni· lateral or bilateral (contracts) . & Lease, Sections 152-179; sale, Sections 180-205; barter, Sections 206- 207; loan, Sections 208-219; independent contracting, Sections 220-235; suretyship, Sections 236--250; agency, Sections 251-263; power of attorney, Sections 264-275; contract of commission, Sections 275 a-y; partnership, Sections 276--366; and insurance, Sections 367-398.
Recommended publications
  • The Philosophy of Contractual Obligation, 21 Marq
    Marquette Law Review Volume 21 Article 1 Issue 4 June 1937 The hiP losophy of Contractual Obligation Robert J. Buer Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr Part of the Law Commons Repository Citation Robert J. Buer, The Philosophy of Contractual Obligation, 21 Marq. L. Rev. 157 (1937). Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol21/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marquette Law Review by an authorized administrator of Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MARQUETTE LAW REVIEW VOLUME XXI JUNE, 1937 NUMBER FOUR THE PHILOSOPHY OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION ROBERT J. BUER THE HISTORY OF CONSIDERATION T HE doctrine of consideration has stood for several centuries as a pillar in the law of contracts, an essential to their enforcement. Students of the law have, from the first instance of their contacts with the great body of jurisprudence, regarded consideration as one of the rudimentary principles upon which future knowledge of the refine- ments and technicalities of the law must be based. However, in recent years, chiefly because of the exceptions to and inconsistencies of the fundamental rule that every contract to be enforceable must be sup- ported by a sufficient consideration, liberal students of the law have advocated the alteration or abolishment of the rule.' These advocates of change in the doctrine are not without sound historical authority as a basis for their demands.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rational Basis of Contracts and Related Problems in Legal Analysis, by Merton Ferson
    Indiana Law Journal Volume 25 Issue 2 Article 15 Winter 1950 The Rational Basis of Contracts and Related Problems in Legal Analysis, by Merton Ferson Edwin W. Patterson Columbia University Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj Part of the Contracts Commons Recommended Citation Patterson, Edwin W. (1950) "The Rational Basis of Contracts and Related Problems in Legal Analysis, by Merton Ferson," Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 25 : Iss. 2 , Article 15. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol25/iss2/15 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOOK REVIEWS not be answered if men seek salvation in the exclusive worship of a popular present-day secular trinity: Purely informative education, tolerance and democracy. Today many men and women have turned for anchorage in a time of stress from religion or devotion to the gods of science to public education. It is assumed that free education for all will give men common goals and a saving wisdom even though the goals of education are not agreed upon. It is assumed that if men accumulate enough facts somehow a sound philosophy will emerge from the pile like some genie from a bottle. Combine education with unlimited tolerance for any and all ideas however incompatible or false and with devotion to a vague something called democracy and everything will come out all right.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Notary in Real Estate Conveyancing
    ARTICLE: THE ROLE OF THE NOTARY IN REAL ESTATE WRITTEN BY: CONVEYANCING ELIANA MORANDI In the field of real estate, the notary’s role of financial assets amount to approximately 25,000 euros oversight and consulting extends to all aspects of and other miscellaneous assets to 20,000 euros),4 the the transaction: from verifying the title of the political and social dimensions of a real estate purchase seller, to tax-related issues and choices, to are abundantly apparent. However, real estate has ascertaining the legal zoning status of the assumed an ever more important role in an increasingly property, to suggesting alternative solutions to global economy as collateral to obtain credit. So called improve the organization and distribution of ‘embedded capital value’ is an important tool for overall economic growth. Taken together, the need for reliability family assets. In addition, should any errors be and security in the circulation of real estate becomes made that compromise the client’s purchase, the increasingly important. notary is fully liable for compensation up to the Since most people make one of the biggest financial entire current value of the property. and emotional investments of their lives when they buy a house, they are understandably adverse to any risk, Conveyancing: modern development and and would not consider monetary compensation new demands related to real estate transfers 1 adequate to make up for the loss of the property. In the credit world, growth and stability are based on the For some time now, there has been a broad debate in reliability of the collateral that backs it up, with the the European Union regarding the regulation of security of the title used as surety constituting a competition, aimed at safeguarding consumers and fundamental condition for granting credit.
    [Show full text]
  • Unconscionable Contracts: a Comparative Study of the Approaches in England, France, Germany, and the United States
    Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review Volume 14 Number 3 Symposium on Unconscionability around the World: Seven Perspectives on the Article 3 Contractual Doctrine 7-1-1992 Unconscionable Contracts: A Comparative Study of the Approaches in England, France, Germany, and the United States A.H. Angelo E.P. Ellinger Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation A.H. Angelo and E.P. Ellinger, Unconscionable Contracts: A Comparative Study of the Approaches in England, France, Germany, and the United States, 14 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 455 (1992). Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr/vol14/iss3/3 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Unconscionable Contracts: A Comparative Study of the Approaches in England, France, Germany, and the United States A.H. ANGELO* AND E.P. ELLINGER** I. FREEDOM OF CONTRACT AND UNCONSCIONABILITY OF TERMS The doctrine of sanctity of contracts is entrenched in both the Anglo-American and western European legal systems. The phrase "freedom of contract" originated in the late eighteenth and the early nineteenth centuries,' and was based on the natural law principle that it is "natural" for parties to perform their bargains or pacts.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Print Version
    HOUSE OF LORDS SESSION 2007–08 [2008] UKHL 55 on appeal from: [2006]EWCA Civ 1139 OPINIONS OF THE LORDS OF APPEAL FOR JUDGMENT IN THE CAUSE Yeoman’s Row Management Limited (Appellants) and another v Cobbe (Respondent) Appellate Committee Lord Hoffmann Lord Scott of Foscote Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood Lord Mance Counsel Appellants: Respondent: Nicholas Dowding QC Thomas Ivory QC Timothy Morshead Myriam Stacey (Instructed by DLA Piper UK LLP) (Instructed by Bird & Bird) Hearing dates: 4 and 5 JUNE 2008 ON WEDNESDAY 30 JULY 2008 HOUSE OF LORDS OPINIONS OF THE LORDS OF APPEAL FOR JUDGMENT IN THE CAUSE Yeoman’s Row Management Limited (Appellants) and another v Cobbe (Respondent) [2008] UKHL 55 LORD HOFFMANN My Lords, 1. I have had the advantage of reading in draft the speech of my noble and learned friend Lord Scott of Foscote. For the reasons he gives, with which I agree, I too would allow this appeal. LORD SCOTT OF FOSCOTE My Lords, Introduction 2. The essence of the problem to be resolved in this case can be quite shortly stated. A is the owner of land with potential for residential development and enters into negotiations with B for the sale of the land to B. They reach an oral “agreement in principle” on the core terms of the sale but no written contract, or even a draft contract for discussion, is produced. There remain some terms still to be agreed. The structure of the agreement in principle that A and B have reached is that B, at his own expense, will make and prosecute an application for the desired residential development and that, if the desired planning permission is obtained, A will sell the land to B, or more probably to a company nominated by B, for an agreed up-front price, £x.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Pictures of Contract: Duty, Power, and Compound Rule
    THREE PICTURES OF CONTRACT: DUTY, POWER, AND COMPOUND RULE GREGORY KLASS* There is a fundamental divide among theories of contract law between those that picture contract as a power and those that picture it as a duty. On the power- conferring picture, contracting is a sort of legislative act in which persons determine what law will apply to their transaction. On the duty-imposing picture, contract law places duties on persons entering into agreements for consideration, whether they want them or not. Until now, very little attention has been paid to the problem of how to tell whether a given rule is power conferring or duty imposing—a question that should lie at the center of contract theory. This Article argues that legal powers have two characteristic features. First, there is an expectation that actors will satisfy the rules with the purpose of achieving the associated legal consequences. Second, the legal rules are designed to facilitate such uses. A law might exhibit these features in either of two ways, which define two types of legal powers. Many laws that create legal powers employ conditions of legal validity, such as legal formalities, designed to guarantee the actor’s legal pur- pose. The presence of such validity conditions is strong evidence that the law’s sole function is to create a legal power, and I suggest reserving the term “power conferring” for such laws. Other laws anticipate and enable their purposive use without conditioning an act’s legal consequences on the actor’s legal purpose. The structure of such laws suggests that they function both to create powers and to impose duties.
    [Show full text]
  • Separate Opinion
    Separate Opinion In the Arbitration under Chapter XI of the NAFTA and the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules: Thunderbird ./. Mexico 1) Summary 1. I concur with my colleagues on several significant issues of the case: • The questions of jurisdiction, admissibility, control and waivers; • the rejection of the expropriation (NAFTA Art. 1110) claim; • the rejection of the “denial of administrative justice” claim; • the rejection of the NAFTA governments’ position that pursuant to Article 1102 Claimant needs to prove that the government had a direct intention to harm the foreign investor because it is foreign is required for Art. 1102 and needs to be proven by claimant; • the general view that the principle of legitimate expectation forms part, i.e. a subcategory, of the duty to afford fair and equitable treatment under Art. 1105 of the NAFTA. We also seem to concur on the general conditions for this claim – an expectation of the investor to be caused by and attributed to the government, backed- up by investment relying on such expectation, requiring the legitimacy of the expectation in terms of the competency of the officials responsible for it and the procedure for issuing it and the reasonableness of the investor in relying on the expectation. I do, however, not concur with the application of this standard to the specific factual situation in light of the purpose, specific content and precedents of the legitimate expectations standard as it should be applied under investment protection treaties based on recent relevant jurisprudence. 2. I have found the rejection of the national treatment (non- discrimination) under Art. 1102 more difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Uncertainty Anthony D'amato Northwestern University School of Law, [email protected]
    Northwestern University School of Law Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons Faculty Working Papers 2010 Legal Uncertainty Anthony D'Amato Northwestern University School of Law, [email protected] Repository Citation D'Amato, Anthony, "Legal Uncertainty" (2010). Faculty Working Papers. Paper 108. http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/facultyworkingpapers/108 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Working Papers by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Legal Uncertainty, by Anthony D'Amato*, 71 California Law Review 1-55 (1983) Abstract: Legal certainty decreases over time. Rules and principles of law become more and more uncertain in content and in application because legal systems are biased in favor of unravelling those rules and principles. In this article I attempt to show what these biases are, and why commentators who have argued that the law tends toward certainty are wrong, then describe various attempts which have been made at restoring certainty, and why these attempts have generally not worked. My conclusion is that these proposals are at best holding actions, and that the tendency toward increasing uncertainty in the law is inexorable. Tags: legal certainty, legal uncertainty, judicial discretion, Case Revision Commission [pg1]** Legal certainty decreases over time. Rules and principles of law become more and more uncertain in content and in application because legal systems are biased in favor of unravelling those rules and principles. In Part I of this Article, I attempt to show what these biases are, and why commentators who have argued that the law tends toward certainty are wrong.
    [Show full text]
  • Differing Unjust Enrichment and Damages in Theory and Practice Under Macedonian Law
    DIFFERING UNJUST ENRICHMENT AND DAMAGES IN THEORY AND PRACTICE UNDER MACEDONIAN LAW Marija AMPOVSKA E-Mail: [email protected] Associate professor at the Faculty of Law Goce Delchev University in Shtip, R.N.Macedonia Abstract Two different relationships regulated by the law of obligations will be subject of analyses in this paper: unjust enrichment and civil liability. In the Republic of North Macedonia, they are distinguished from one another in the legal theory as well as in legislation, and there are different prerequisites for the rise of the obligations as well as for the claims in cases of court protection of subjective rights. The boundary between them is not so clearly drawn with respect to the prerequisites for the claim or the legal consequences. There is a fluid transition between the law on unjust enrichment and law on damages and overlap between them. The papers aim to detect those similarities, as well as to list the differences between the unjust enrichment and the damages in a way that will be useful for both legal theory and practice in Macedonian law. Enrichment of this paper will be the research conducted in the court practice in eastern Macedonian region in order to establish the current legal practice and problems with regard to these two obligations. Key words: unjust enrichment, tort, liability, compensation of damage, claim. 1. Introduction on unjust enrichment and damages In common law systems, historically, the prime impetus for the development of unjust enrichment has been to bring together various instances of restitutionary liability that common law had assigned to different compartments.
    [Show full text]
  • Law 332 Course Title: Law of Commercial Transactions Ii
    NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA SCHOOL OF LAW COURSE CODE: LAW 332 COURSE TITLE: LAW OF COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS II i COURSE CODE: LAW 332 LAW OF COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS 2 Course Developer/Writer Mr. Ugbejeh Ernest Ogwashi National Open University of Nigeria, Victoria Island, Lagos. Course Editors Prof. Justus A. Sokefun National Open University of Nigeria Victoria Island, Lagos. Dr. (Mrs.) Erimma Gloria Orie National Open University of Nigeria, Victoria Island, Lagos. Dean Prof. Justus A. Sokefun National Open University of Nigeria Victoria Island, Lagos. Course Lecturers Mrs. Anene Francisca, Mr. Ugbejeh Ernest Ogwashi, Mr. Njoku Nduka National Open University of Nigeria Victoria Island, Lagos. ii National Open University of Nigeria Headquarters 14/16 Ahmadu Bello Way Victoria Island Lagos Abuja Office No. 5 Dares Salaam Street Off Aminu Kano Crescent Wuse II, Abuja Nigeria e-mail: [email protected] URL: www.nou.edu.ng 2015 iii CONTENTS PAGE Introduction …………………………………………..…….…… Course Aim ……………………………………….….…………. Course Objectives ………………………………………………. Working through this Course ……………………………………. Course Materials ………………………………………………… Study Units ……………………………………………………… Text books and References …………………………………..…… Assessment ……………………………………………………..… Tutor Marked Assignment ………………………………………… Final Examination and Grading …………………………………… Course Marking Scheme ….………………………………….……. Course Overview/Presentation ……………………………….……. How to Get the Most from this Course ……………………………. Facilitators/Tutors and Tutorials …………………………….……. Summary …………………………………………………… ..…… Introduction Welcome to Law 332: Law of Commercial Transaction II. This course is a compulsory course in National Open University of Nigeria that you must offer in the Law programme. This course is offered in the second semester of third year of your study and it is a 4 credit unit course. As noted in the first semester course guide which dealt basically with the sale of goods, this second semester shall deal with the aspect of commercial transactions relating to Agency and Hire Purchase.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Legal Transaction?
    What is a legal transaction? Jaap Hage1 University of Maastricht Department of Metajuridica [email protected] 1 A FIRST IMPRESSION Neil MacCormick has, in the course of his rich academic career, written on many central issues of both legal philosophy and jurisprudence. From the point of view of this paper, his work on the institutional theory of law has been crucial. In this paper I will focus on a phenomenon which is, in my opinion, best elucidated by means of this institutional theory of law, namely the phenomenon of legal transactions. The notion of a legal transaction (legal act, act-in-the-law, Rechtsgeschäft, acte juridique) does not play an important role in the common law tradition, but in the civil law tradition of the European continent it is one of the basic legal notions. Legal transactions are the means by which legal subjects can change the legal positions of themselves or other persons intentionally. Examples from private law are contracts, terminations of contracts, last wills, transfers of rights, and the creation of rights in rem such as usufruct and mortgage. Examples from public law are legislation, and dispositions. The notion of a legal transaction was probably abstracted from the more specific notion of a contract. In connection with contract formation, an elaborate doctrine has developed in the course of many centuries. The observation that a contract is normally formed on the basis of will (intention) and declaration of it turned out to be useful for understanding other transactions in private law, and then also in public law.
    [Show full text]
  • Unmarried Couples and Unjust Enrichment: from Status to Contract and Back Again?
    Michigan Law Review Volume 77 Issue 1 1978 Unmarried Couples and Unjust Enrichment: From Status to Contract and Back Again? Robert C. Casad University of Kansas Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Family Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Property Law and Real Estate Commons Recommended Citation Robert C. Casad, Unmarried Couples and Unjust Enrichment: From Status to Contract and Back Again?, 77 MICH. L. REV. 47 (1978). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol77/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNMARRIED COUPLES AND UNJUST ENRICHMENT: FROM STATUS TO CONTRACT AND BACK AGAIN? Robert C. Casad* DEAR ABBY: Who should pay for what in a live-in type relationship? -THE FEMALE DEAR FEMALE: In any kind of relationship, the assets, liabili­ ties and responsibilities should be shared 50-50 .... You might consider living with this free-loading, well-to-do creep just long enough to confirm a common law status (under recent court deci­ sion), and then sock it to him! 1 In recent years, litigation over property arrangements be­ tween unmarried cohabitants has posed some old questions in a new light and has yielded some new answers. One of the most intriguing of these questions is whether a cohabitant has a right, upon dissolution of the relationship, to remuneration for house­ hold services rendered during the relationship.
    [Show full text]