DOCSLIB.ORG

Pulsar Science with the SKA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pulsar Science with the SKA Pulsar Science with the SKA Dr. Michael Keith – University of Manchester, Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics On behalf of the CSP and SDP consortia and the Pulsar Science Working Group Thanks to M. Kramer and B. Stappers for many slides Pulsars… …cosmic lighthouses …almost Black Holes: mass of ~1.4 Solar Mass within 20km …objects of extreme matter 10x nuclear density 13 B ~ Bcr = 4.4 x 10 Gauss Voltage drops ~ 1012 volts 10-12 FEM = 10 Fgravity High-temperature & superfluid superconductor …natural clocks with wide range of periods: J1748-2446ad Period J2144-3933 1.4 ms 8.5 s 42,960 Rotations per Minute 7 è Lots of interesting precision physics… Already today, we can do amazing measurements… Masses: • Masses of neutron stars: m1 = 1.4398(2) M⊙ and m2 = 1.3886(2) M⊙ (Weisberg et al. 2010) • Mass of WD companions: – Shapiro: 0.204(2) M⊙ (Jacoby et al. 2005) – Optical: 0.181(7) M⊙ (Antoniadis et al. 2013) • Mass of millisecond pulsar: 1.67(2) M⊙ (Freire et al. 2010) • Main sequence star companion: 1.029(8) M⊙ (Freire et al. 2010) Spin parameters: • Period: 5.757451924362137(2) ms (Verbiest et al. 2008) = 2 atto seconds uncertainty! Orbital parameters: • Period: 0.102251562479(8) day (Kramer et al. in prep.) • Eccentricity: 3.5 (1.1) × 10−7 (Freire et al. 2012) Astrometry: • Distance: 157(1) pc (Verbiest et al. 2008) • Proper motion: 140.915(1) mas/yr (Verbiest e t al. 2008) GR tests: • Periastron advance: 4.226598(5) deg/yr (Weisberg et al. 2010) • Shrinkage due to GW emission: 7.152±0.008 mm/day (Kramer et al. in prep) • GR validity (obs/exp): 1.0000(5) (Kramer et al. in prep.) But with the SKA…we can do so much more!! So far, pulsar science hasn’t done badly… • Pulsar astrophysics has a quite impressive track record of discoveries • Large range of applications in the widest area of physics and astrophysics from smallest (=solid states physics) to largest scales (=grav. physics) • Don’t think that we have enough! … quite the opposite! • The SKA is a superb instrument for pulsar research: - large collecting area Never have enough of that..! - large fractional bandwidth - large field-of-view Monitoring and searChing with - multi-beaming capabilities exCellent CadenCe & survey speed • We have high expectations based on previous and recent experience Key Science and more… • Key Science (“Gravity with pulsars and BHs”) described in Kramer et al. (2004) • Key Science capabilities enable a wide range of further exciting science, as described in Cordes et al. (2004) and other chapters: Cosmic census for pulsars: - Galactic population of radio emitting neutron stars (pulsars, magnetars etc.) - Galactic centre pulsars - Globular clusters & external galaxies Fundamental physics: - Tests of theories of gravity, incl. BH properties - Detection and study of gravitational waves, GW astronomy - Equation-of-state of super-dense matter, structure of neutron stars Relativistic plasma physics: Pulsar magnetospheres, emission physics. Mapping the Milky Way: interstellar medium, Galactic magnetic field. Properties of the intergalactic medium: giant pulses from extragalactic pulsars. Core-collapse supernova, formation of neutron stars, birth properties. A simple recipe 1. Find them 2. Time them 3. VLBI them In other words: Discovering is not enough. To extract science, timing (follow-up) observations of all discovered pulsars are needed. Lots of discoveries since SKA Science Book: “We’ve been busy…” Animation by Cherry Ng SKA science case written • Currently, more than 2,300 pulsars, and nearly 300 milliseCond pulsars • SinCe 2004 SCienCe Book, nearly twiCe as many normal pulsars and three Nmes as many milliseCond pulsars (digital signal proCessing!) Discoveries lead to excellent science! 1 Triple System 0.9 All pulsars GalacNC Centre Magnetar Millisecond Pulsars (P<30ms)J0348+0432 0.8 Thornton et al. Bursts 1st Pulsars via AI and Volunteer CompuNng 0.7 100th FERMI Pulsar 1st Blind-searCh radio magnetar 0.6 2-M¤ Pulsar Missing-link pulsar 0.5 Sub-100ns ming 0.4 “Lorimer Burst” IntermiXent pulsars Cumulative Distribution 0.3 RRATs Fastest MSP! 0.2 Double Pulsar 0.1 0 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Year Discoveries lead to excellent science! 1 Triple System 0.9 All pulsars GalacNC Centre Magnetar Millisecond Pulsars (P<30ms)J0348+0432 0.8 Thornton et al. Bursts 1st Pulsars via AI and Volunteer CompuNng 0.7 100th FERMI Pulsar 1st Blind-searCh radio magnetar 0.6 2-M¤ Pulsar Missing-link pulsar 0.5 Sub-100ns ming 0.4 “Lorimer Burst” IntermiXent pulsars Cumulative Distribution 0.3 RRATs Fastest MSP! 0.2 Double Pulsar 0.1 0 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Year Exciting science ranging from solid-state physics to testing gravity. “…but that’s only the beginning!” 1 0.9 All pulsars Millisecond Pulsars (P<30ms) SKA 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 So far, only a modest prelude! 0.4 Cumulative Distribution 0.3 0.2 Today! 0.1 Original SKA SCienCe Book 0 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 Year • We can expect to find about 30,000 active (visible) pulsars • Among those will be about 2000 millisecond pulsars • A dramatic increase in the number of known sources! All too easy? • Unknown dispersion measure… ~5000 trials • Unknown orbit… ~200 trials • So 1 million trials (per beam), in real time (~600s) • 600 us per trial, 8Mpt FFT + analysis • Need ~10 petaFLOP/s! ~MWatt • Cost increases as cube of integration time – So need to maximise Aeff/Tsys • Cost increases as square of core radius – So need compact core (~1km) Potential of SKA and pathfnders SKA1, SKA1, LOFAR, SKA1, JVLA MeerKAT ASKAP mid survey NL low ? ? ? ? Aeff/Tsys m2/K 265 321 1630 65 391 61 1000 Survey>FoV deg2 0.14 0.48 0.39 30 18 6 6 Survey>Speed> 21 41 deg m 0.98×104 5.0×104 1.0×106 1.3×105 2.8×106 2.2×104 6.0×106 FoM K22 Resolution arcsec 1.4 11 0.22 7 0.9 5 11 Beams to Cover 2200 96 1 sq degree (1km core) @1.4GHz @0.3GHz Science increase is enabled mostly by increased instantaneous sensivity… But number of beams to Nle sky is also direCtly proporNonal to Computaon Cost SKA1 will already be an excellent search machine We can find nearly 50% of all pulsars with a combination of SKA1-Low and SKA1-Mid. (We can expect to find about 30,000 pulsars) Stappers (priv. comm.) Normal – SKA1-mid Normal – SKA1-low MSP – SKA1-mid Note: Remember – all sky with Low requires far fewer beams • = less observing Nme SKA2 does not add as much to pulsar surveys since majority of extra dishes = less CompuNng are outside the core. = less power requirements • BUT - SKA2 will be needed to realise the full potential of all these discoveries. Timing of these pulsars will achieve important SKA science goals: ü Tests of gravity with pulsars ü Radio pulsars in the Galactic Centre ü Gravitational wave astronomy ü Cosmic census of radio emitting neutron stars ü Understanding the neutron star population ü Properties of super-dense matter, e.g. neutron star equation of state ü Understanding pulsar magnetospheres and the physics behind them ü Understanding Galactic structure (incl. ISM & magnetic feld) ü PLUS: Fast transients (different science, but “BOGOF” with pulsars) UK involvement in “Non-imaging” part of SKA Purple boxes are UK lead (Uni. ManChester) Oxford are also heavily involved in “Non-imaging” work SADT = signal and data transport… a big part of making SKA work! (also led from ManChester) SADT Central Signal ProCessing SCienCe Data ProCessor Transient Correlator Data Analysis Pulsar SADT SEARCH Pulsar SearCh Beam- Data Analysis former Pulsar Pulsar Timing TIMING Data Analysis (Calibraon/imaging not shown!) UK involvement in Pulsar Science • Ben Stappers (Manchester) and Michael Kramer (MPIfR & Manchester) chair SKA Pulsar Science Working Group. • Manchester and Oxford have direct involvement in LOFAR/MEERKAT projects for pulsars which are pathfinding for SKA. So the UK is at the heart of pulsar science with the SKA! Get in touch if you have ideas/questions/ proposals/etc. Conclusion • Pulsars remain key science for the SKA – Fundamental physics (gravitation) – Exciting and exotic new astrophysics – 2000 pulsars have given us so many astonishing results… 30000 will • UK institutes are central to the design of the pulsar (and fast transient) instruments for SKA – We are designing to maximize the science potential – Need to maximize collecting area in the inner 1km of SKA1 • Te UK is at the heart of pulsar science with SKA – We are best placed to exploit the design work we are leading .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Exploring Pulsars
    High-energy astrophysics Explore the PUL SAR menagerie Astronomers are discovering many strange properties of compact stellar objects called pulsars. Here’s how they fit together. by Victoria M. Kaspi f you browse through an astronomy book published 25 years ago, you’d likely assume that astronomers understood extremely dense objects called neutron stars fairly well. The spectacular Crab Nebula’s central body has been a “poster child” for these objects for years. This specific neutron star is a pulsar that I rotates roughly 30 times per second, emitting regular appar- ent pulsations in Earth’s direction through a sort of “light- house” effect as the star rotates. While these textbook descriptions aren’t incorrect, research over roughly the past decade has shown that the picture they portray is fundamentally incomplete. Astrono- mers know that the simple scenario where neutron stars are all born “Crab-like” is not true. Experts in the field could not have imagined the variety of neutron stars they’ve recently observed. We’ve found that bizarre objects repre- sent a significant fraction of the neutron star population. With names like magnetars, anomalous X-ray pulsars, soft gamma repeaters, rotating radio transients, and compact Long the pulsar poster child, central objects, these bodies bear properties radically differ- the Crab Nebula’s central object is a fast-spinning neutron star ent from those of the Crab pulsar. Just how large a fraction that emits jets of radiation at its they represent is still hotly debated, but it’s at least 10 per- magnetic axis. Astronomers cent and maybe even the majority.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 22 Neutron Stars and Black Holes Units of Chapter 22 22.1 Neutron Stars 22.2 Pulsars 22.3 Xxneutron-Star Binaries: X-Ray Bursters
    Chapter 22 Neutron Stars and Black Holes Units of Chapter 22 22.1 Neutron Stars 22.2 Pulsars 22.3 XXNeutron-Star Binaries: X-ray bursters [Look at the slides and the pictures in your book, but I won’t test you on this in detail, and we may skip altogether in class.] 22.4 Gamma-Ray Bursts 22.5 Black Holes 22.6 XXEinstein’s Theories of Relativity Special Relativity 22.7 Space Travel Near Black Holes 22.8 Observational Evidence for Black Holes Tests of General Relativity Gravity Waves: A New Window on the Universe Neutron Stars and Pulsars (sec. 22.1, 2 in textbook) 22.1 Neutron Stars According to models for stellar explosions: After a carbon detonation supernova (white dwarf in binary), little or nothing remains of the original star. After a core collapse supernova, part of the core may survive. It is very dense—as dense as an atomic nucleus—and is called a neutron star. [Recall that during core collapse the iron core (ashes of previous fusion reactions) is disintegrated into protons and neutrons, the protons combine with the surrounding electrons to make more neutrons, so the core becomes pure neutron matter. Because of this, core collapse can be halted if the core’s mass is between 1.4 (the Chandrasekhar limit) and about 3-4 solar masses, by neutron degeneracy.] What do you get if the core mass is less than 1.4 solar masses? Greater than 3-4 solar masses? 22.1 Neutron Stars Neutron stars, although they have 1–3 solar masses, are so dense that they are very small.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraining the Neutron Star Equation of State with Astrophysical Observables
    CONSTRAINING THE NEUTRON STAR EQUATION OF STATE WITH ASTROPHYSICAL OBSERVABLES by Carolyn A. Raithel Copyright © Carolyn A. Raithel 2020 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ASTRONOMY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WITH A MAJOR IN ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2020 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Looking back over the last five years, this dissertation would not have been possible with the support of many people. First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Feryal Ozel,¨ from whom I have learned so much { about not only the science I want to do, but about the type of scientist I want to be. I am grateful as well for the support and mentorship of Dimitrios Psaltis and Vasileios Paschalidis { I have so enjoyed working with and learning from you both. To Joel Weisberg, my undergraduate research advisor who first got me started on this journey and who has continued to support me throughout, thank you. I believe a scientist is shaped by the mentors she has early in her career, and I am grateful to have had so many excellent ones. I am deeply thankful for my friends, near and far, who have supported me, encouraged me, and helped preserve my sanity over the last five years. To our astronomy crafting group Lia, Ekta, Samantha, and Allie; to my office mates David, Gabrielle, Tyler, Kaushik, and Michi; to Sarah, Marina, Tanner, Charlie, and Lina{ thank you. I will be forever grateful to my family for their continual support { espe- cially my parents, Don and Kathy, who instilled in me a love for learning from a very young age and who have encouraged me ever since.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short Walk Through the Physics of Neutron Stars
    A short walk through the physics of neutron stars Isaac Vidaña, INFN Catania ASTRA: Advanced and open problems in low-energy nuclear and hadronic STRAngeness physics October 23rd-27th 2017, Trento (Italy) This short talk is just a brush-stroke on the physics of neutron stars. Three excellent monographs on this topic for interested readers are: Neutron stars are different things for different people ² For astronomers are very little stars “visible” as radio pulsars or sources of X- and γ-rays. ² For particle physicists are neutrino sources (when they born) and probably the only places in the Universe where deconfined quark matter may be abundant. ² For cosmologists are “almost” black holes. ² For nuclear physicists & the participants of this workshop are the biggest neutron-rich (hyper)nuclei of the Universe (A ~ 1056-1057, R ~ 10 km, M ~ 1-2 M ). ¤ But everybody agrees that … Neutron stars are a type of stellar compact remnant that can result from the gravitational collapse of a massive star (8 M¤< M < 25 M¤) during a Type II, Ib or Ic supernova event. 50 years of the discovery of the first radio pulsar ² radio pulsar at 81.5 MHz ² pulse period P=1.337 s Most NS are observed as pulsars. In 1967 Jocelyn Bell & Anthony Hewish discover the first radio pulsar, soon identified as a rotating neutron star (1974 Nobel Prize for Hewish but not for Jocelyn) Nowadays more than 2000 pulsars are known (~ 1900 Radio PSRs (141 in binary systems), ~ 40 X-ray PSRs & ~ 60 γ-ray PSRs) Observables § Period (P, dP/dt) § Masses § Luminosity § Temperature http://www.phys.ncku.edu.tw/~astrolab/mirrors/apod_e/ap090709.html
    [Show full text]
  • Origin and Binary Evolution of Millisecond Pulsars
    Origin and binary evolution of millisecond pulsars Francesca D’Antona and Marco Tailo Abstract We summarize the channels formation of neutron stars (NS) in single or binary evolution and the classic recycling scenario by which mass accretion by a donor companion accelerates old NS to millisecond pulsars (MSP). We consider the possible explanations and requirements for the high frequency of the MSP population in Globular Clusters. Basics of binary evolution are given, and the key concepts of systemic angular momentum losses are first discussed in the framework of the secular evolution of Cataclysmic Binaries. MSP binaries with compact companions represent end-points of previous evolution. In the class of systems characterized by short orbital period %orb and low companion mass we may instead be catching the recycling phase ‘in the act’. These systems are in fact either MSP, or low mass X–ray binaries (LMXB), some of which accreting X–ray MSP (AMXP), or even ‘transitional’ systems from the accreting to the radio MSP stage. The donor structure is affected by irradiation due to X–rays from the accreting NS, or by the high fraction of MSP rotational energy loss emitted in the W rays range of the energy spectrum. X– ray irradiation leads to cyclic LMXB stages, causing super–Eddington mass transfer rates during the first phases of the companion evolution, and, possibly coupled with the angular momentum carried away by the non–accreted matter, helps to explain ¤ the high positive %orb’s of some LMXB systems and account for the (apparently) different birthrates of LMXB and MSP. Irradiation by the MSP may be able to drive the donor to a stage in which either radio-ejection (in the redbacks) or mass loss due to the companion expansion, and ‘evaporation’ may govern the evolution to the black widow stage and to the final disruption of the companion.
    [Show full text]
  • A Modern View of the Equation of State in Nuclear and Neutron Star Matter
    S S symmetry Article A Modern View of the Equation of State in Nuclear and Neutron Star Matter G. Fiorella Burgio * , Hans-Josef Schulze , Isaac Vidaña and Jin-Biao Wei INFN Sezione di Catania, Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Catania, Via Santa Sofia 64, 95123 Catania, Italy; [email protected] (H.-J.S.); [email protected] (I.V.); [email protected] (J.-B.W.) * Correspondence: fi[email protected] Abstract: Background: We analyze several constraints on the nuclear equation of state (EOS) cur- rently available from neutron star (NS) observations and laboratory experiments and study the existence of possible correlations among properties of nuclear matter at saturation density with NS observables. Methods: We use a set of different models that include several phenomenological EOSs based on Skyrme and relativistic mean field models as well as microscopic calculations based on different many-body approaches, i.e., the (Dirac–)Brueckner–Hartree–Fock theories, Quantum Monte Carlo techniques, and the variational method. Results: We find that almost all the models considered are compatible with the laboratory constraints of the nuclear matter properties as well as with the +0.10 largest NS mass observed up to now, 2.14−0.09 M for the object PSR J0740+6620, and with the upper limit of the maximum mass of about 2.3–2.5 M deduced from the analysis of the GW170817 NS merger event. Conclusion: Our study shows that whereas no correlation exists between the tidal deformability and the value of the nuclear symmetry energy at saturation for any value of the NS mass, very weak correlations seem to exist with the derivative of the nuclear symmetry energy and with the nuclear incompressibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows and Evolution of Postburst Fireballs With
    A&A manuscript no. (will be inserted by hand later) ASTRONOMY AND Your thesaurus codes are: ASTROPHYSICS (08.14.1; 08.16.6; 13.07.1) 15.1.2018 Gamma-ray burst afterglows and evolution of postburst fireballs with energy injection from strongly magnetic millisecond pulsars Z. G. Dai1 and T. Lu2,1,3 1Department of Astronomy, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, P.R. China 2CCAST (World Laboratory), P.O. Box 8730, Beijing 100080, P.R. China 3LCRHEA, IHEP, CAS, Beijing, P.R. China Received ???; accepted ??? Abstract. Millisecond pulsars with strong magnetic Most of the models proposed to explain the occur- fields may be formed through several processes, e.g. rence of cosmological GRBs are related with compact ob- accretion-induced collapse of magnetized white dwarfs, jects from which a large amount of energy available for merger of two neutron stars, and accretion-induced phase an extremely relativistic fireball is extracted through neu- transitions of neutron stars. During the birth of such a trino emission and/or dissipation of electromagnetic en- pulsar, an initial fireball available for a gamma-ray burst ergy. One such possibility is newborn millisecond pulsars (GRB) may occur. We here study evolution of a post- with strong magnetic fields, which may be formed by sev- burst relativistic fireball with energy injection from the eral models, e.g. (1) accretion-induced collapse of magne- pulsar through magnetic dipole radiation, and find that tized white dwarfs, (2) merger of two neutron stars, and the magnitude of the optical afterglow from this fireball (3) accretion-induced phase transitions of neutron stars.
    [Show full text]
  • Astro2020 Science White Paper Fundamental Physics with Radio Millisecond Pulsars
    Astro2020 Science White Paper Fundamental Physics with Radio Millisecond Pulsars Thematic Areas: 3Formation and Evolution of Compact Objects 3Cosmology and Fundamental Physics Principal Author: Emmanuel Fonseca (McGill Univ.), [email protected] Co-authors: P. Demorest (NRAO), S. Ransom (NRAO), I. Stairs (UBC), and NANOGrav This is one of five core white papers from the NANOGrav Collaboration; the others are: • Gravitational Waves, Extreme Astrophysics, and Fundamental Physics With Pulsar Timing Arrays, J. Cordes, M. McLaughlin, et al. • Supermassive Black-hole Demographics & Environments With Pulsar Timing Arrays, S. R. Taylor, S. Burke-Spolaor, et al. • Multi-messenger Astrophysics with Pulsar Timing Arrays, L.Z. Kelley, M. Charisi, et al. • Physics Beyond the Standard Model with Pulsar Timing Arrays, X. Siemens, J. Hazboun, et al. Abstract: We summarize the state of the art and future directions in using millisecond ra- dio pulsars to test gravitation and measure intrinsic, fundamental parameters of the pulsar sys- tems. As discussed below, such measurements continue to yield high-impact constraints on vi- able nuclear processes that govern the theoretically-elusive interior of neutron stars, and place the most stringent limits on the validity of general relativity in extreme environments. Ongoing and planned pulsar-timing measurements provide the greatest opportunities for measurements of compact-object masses and new general-relativistic variations in orbits. arXiv:1903.08194v1 [astro-ph.HE] 19 Mar 2019 A radio pulsar in relativistic orbit with a white dwarf. (Credit: ESO / L. Calc¸ada) 1 1 Key Motivations & Opportunities One of the outstanding mysteries in astrophysics is the nature of gravitation and matter within extreme-density environments.
    [Show full text]
  • New Views of Thermonuclear Bursts
    3 New Views of Thermonuclear Bursts Tod Strohmayer Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 Lars Bildsten Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics and Department of Physics University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 3.1 Introduction Many accreting neutron stars erupt in spectacular thermonuclear conflagra- tions every few hours to days. These events, known as Type I X-ray bursts, or simply X-ray bursts, are the subject of our review. Since the last review of X- ray burst phenomenology was written (Lewin, van Paradijs & Taam 1993; hereafter LVT), powerful new X-ray observatories, the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE), the Italian - Dutch BeppoSAX mission, XMM-Newton and Chandra have enabled the discovery of entirely new phenomena associated with thermonuclear burning on neutron stars. Some of these new findings include: (i) the discovery of millisecond (300 - 600 Hz) oscillations during bursts, so called “burst oscillations”, (ii) a new regime of nuclear burning on neutron stars which manifests itself through the gener- ation of hours long flares about once a decade, now referred to as “superbursts”, (iii) discoveries of bursts from low accretion rate neutron stars, and (iv) new evidence for discrete spectral features from bursting neutron stars. It is perhaps surprising that nuclear physics plays such a prominent role in the phenomenology of an accreting neutron star, as the gravitational energy released per accreted baryon (of mass mp) is GMmp/R ≈ 200 MeV is so much larger than the nuclear energy released by fusion (≈ 5 MeV when a solar mix goes to heavy elements).
    [Show full text]
  • Fast Radio Bursts
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Fast radio bursts Petroff, E.; Hessels, J.W.T.; Lorimer, D.R. DOI 10.1007/s00159-019-0116-6 Publication date 2019 Document Version Final published version Published in Astronomy and Astrophysics Review License CC BY Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Petroff, E., Hessels, J. W. T., & Lorimer, D. R. (2019). Fast radio bursts. Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 27(1), [4]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-019-0116-6 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:03 Oct 2021 The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review (2019) 27:4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-019-0116-6 REVIEW ARTICLE Fast radio bursts E. Petroff1,2 · J.
    [Show full text]
  • Afterglow Light Curve Modulated by a Highly Magnetized Millisecond Pulsar
    A&A 381, L5–L8 (2002) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011545 & c ESO 2002 Astrophysics Afterglow light curve modulated by a highly magnetized millisecond pulsar H.-Y. Chang, C.-H. Lee, and I. Yi Korea Institute for Advanced Study, 207-43 Cheongryangri-dong Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-012, Korea e-mail: chlee, [email protected] Received 18 September 2001 / Accepted 6 November 2001 Abstract. We investigate consequences of a continuously energy-injecting central engine of gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglow emission, assuming that a highly magnetized pulsar is left beaming in the core of a GRB pro- genitor. Beaming and continuous energy-injection are natural consequences of the pulsar origin of GRB afterglows. Whereas previous studies have considered continuous energy-injection from a new-born pulsar to interpret the deviation of afterglow light curves of GRBs from those with the simple power law behavior, a beaming effect, which is one of the most important aspects of pulsar emissions, is ignored in earlier investigations. We explicitly include the beaming effect and consider a change of the beaming with time due to a dynamical evolution of a new-born pulsar. We show that the magnitude of the afterglow from this fireball indeed first decreases with time, subsequently rises, and declines again. One of the most peculiar optical afterglows light curve of GRB 970508 can be accounted for by continuous energy injection with beaming due to a highly magnetized new-born pulsar. We discuss implications on such observational evidence for a pulsar. Key words. gamma rays: bursts – pulsar: general – stars: magnetic fields 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Millisecond Pulsars, Their Evolution and Applications
    J. Astrophys. Astr. (September 2017) 38:42 © Indian Academy of Sciences DOI 10.1007/s12036-017-9469-2 Review Millisecond Pulsars, their Evolution and Applications R. N. MANCHESTER CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science, P.O. Box 76, Epping, NSW 1710, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] MS received 15 May 2017; accepted 28 July 2017; published online 7 September 2017 Abstract. Millisecond pulsars (MSPs) are short-period pulsars that are distinguished from “normal” pulsars, not only by their short period, but also by their very small spin-down rates and high probability of being in a binary system. These properties are consistent with MSPs having a different evolutionary history to normal pulsars, viz., neutron-star formation in an evolving binary system and spin-up due to accretion from the binary companion. Their very stable periods make MSPs nearly ideal probes of a wide variety of astrophysical phenomena. For example, they have been used to detect planets around pulsars, to test the accuracy of gravitational theories, to set limits on the low-frequency gravitational-wave background in the Universe, and to establish pulsar-based timescales that rival the best atomic-clock timescales in long-term stability. MSPs also provide a window into stellar and binary evolution, often suggesting exotic pathways to the observed systems. The X-ray accretion- powered MSPs, and especially those that transition between an accreting X-ray MSP and a non-accreting radio MSP, give important insight into the physics of accretion on to highly magnetized neutron stars. Keywords. Pulsars—general—stars: evolution—gravitation. 1. Introduction pulsar was found in September 1982 at Arecibo Obser- vatory in a very high time-resolution search of the The first pulsars discovered (Hewish et al.
    [Show full text]