DOCSLIB.ORG

Finalized Critical Habitat

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Tuesday, August 5, 2008 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for the Sierra Nevada Bighorn Sheep (Ovis canadensis sierrae) and Taxonomic Revision; Final Rule VerDate Aug<31>2005 13:15 Aug 04, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\05AUR2.SGM 05AUR2 dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES2 45534 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 5, 2008 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR listing rule published in the Federal show a unique fixed haplotype for O. c. Register on January 3, 2000 (65 FR 20) californiana from the Sierra Nevada Fish and Wildlife Service and the proposed critical habitat rule (Ramey 1995, p. 433). Based on this published in the Federal Register on finding, bighorn sheep from the Sierra 50 CFR Part 17 July 25, 2007 (72 FR 40955). Nevada could be distinguished from [FWS–R8–ES–2008–0014; 92210–1117– The bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) populations of other subspecies of 0000–B4] is a large mammal in the family Bovidae bighorn sheep (Ramey 1995, p. 433). described by Shaw in 1804 (Shackleton Results indicated that significant RIN 1018–AV05 1985, p. 1). Cowan (1940, pp. 519–569) differences in mtDNA haplotype recognized several subspecies based on Endangered and Threatened Wildlife frequencies can be found among geography and skull measurements. populations that are adjacent to one and Plants; Designation of Critical Recent genetic (Ramey 1993, pp. 62–86; Habitat for the Sierra Nevada Bighorn another and separated by short 1995, p. 432–434; Boyce et al. 1996, pp. distances (Ramey 1995, p. 435). A few Sheep (Ovis canadensis sierrae) and 423–426, 429; Gutierrez-Espeleta et al. rare haplotypes were limited in Taxonomic Revision 1998, pp. 7–9, 11) and morphological distribution and found in only single data (Wehausen and Ramey 1993, pp. 4– AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, populations. One of these populations 8; 2000, pp. 148–153), and review and Interior. included the Sierra Nevada (Ramey ACTION: Final rule. reanalysis of Cowan’s data (Ramey 1993, p. 83), do not support Cowan’s original 1995, p. 433). SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and subspecies differentiations. Wehausen and Ramey (2000, pp. 148– Wildlife Service (Service), are Ramey (1993, pp. 71–72; 1995, p. 432) 153) used univariate and multivariate designating critical habitat for the Sierra found, based on mitochondrial DNA statistical methods to examine the Nevada bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis (mtDNA), bighorn sheep from the Sierra geographic variation in horn and skull sierrae) under the Endangered Species Nevada to be more allied with sheep characters of 694 bighorn sheep (Ovis Act of 1973, as amended (Act). In total, occupying the adjacent desert area than canadensis) from the Great Basin to approximately 417,577 acres (ac) those to the north. Ramey (1993, pp. 67– British Columbia and Alberta. California (168,992 hectares (ha)) fall within the 68; 1995, pp. 433, 435) also found Sierra bighorn sheep (O. c. californiana) from boundaries of the critical habitat Nevada bighorn sheep to be a distinctive Washington and British Columbia were designation. The critical habitat is group in the desert region extending not distinguishable from Rocky located in Tuolumne, Mono, Fresno, east to Utah and New Mexico and south Mountain bighorn sheep (O. c. Inyo, and Tulare Counties, California. to northern Mexico. Ramey (1993 p. 54) canadensis); however, they did differ We also are finalizing the revision of used mtDNA as a genetic marker to help from Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep taxonomy of the listed entity from a understand the evolutionary history of populations considered to be O. c. distinct population segment (DPS) of North American mountain sheep. From californiana. Extirpated populations California bighorn sheep (Ovis the 116 individuals included in the from northeastern California, Oregon, canadensis californiana) to subspecies, surveys, 16 different mtDNA haplotypes and southwestern Idaho shared a horn- Ovis canadensis sierrae, based on recent were identified in North America and related character with Nelson bighorn published information. four in Asia (Ramey 1993, p. 62). Two sheep (O. c. nelsoni) from the Great major mtDNA lineages of mountain DATES: This rule becomes effective on Basin; this shared character was sheep were indicated in North America September 4, 2008. different from Rocky Mountain bighorn (Ramey 1993, p. 63). Within the sheep. Individuals from the Sierra ADDRESSES: The final rule, economic northern Alaska and western North Nevada were distinguishable from analysis, and maps are available at America clade, three mtDNA lineages bighorn sheep from the Great Basin. http://www.regulations.gov and at were identified (Ramey 1993, p. 72). These results agree with geographic http://www.fws.gov/nevada. Supporting One lineage included bighorn sheep in documentation we used in the the desert ranges of the southwestern patterns identified with the mtDNA preparation of this final rule is available United States and Mexico and the Sierra studies of Ramey (1993, 1995) for public inspection, by appointment, Nevada (Ramey 1993, p. 72), where the (Wehausen and Ramey 2000, p. 156). during normal business hours, at the Sierra Nevada population was found to Wehausen and Ramey (2000, pp. 153– Nevada Fish and Wildlife Office, 1340 be more closely related to the desert- 157) synonymized the extinct Audubon Financial Boulevard, Suite 234, Reno, dwelling sheep than those from the subspecies, O. c. auduboni, from east of NV 89523; telephone 775–861–6300; Cascade Ranges or Rocky Mountains the Rocky Mountains in eastern facsimile 775–861–6301. (Ramey 1993, p. 72). Within the desert- Montana and Wyoming, North Dakota, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: dwelling sheep populations, Sierra South Dakota, and western Nebraska Robert D. Williams, U.S. Fish and Nevada bighorn sheep differed (Ramey with O. c. canadensis. They also Wildlife Service, Nevada Fish and 1993, p. 73). Ramey (1995 p. 429) used assigned extinct and extant native Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES section). mtDNA as a genetic marker to help populations of O. c. californiana from If you use a telecommunications device understand the evolutionary history of Washington and British Columbia to O. for the deaf (TDD), call the Federal North American mountain sheep in the c. canadensis and the extinct native Information Relay Service (FIRS) at southwest United States. Ten mtDNA populations of O. c. californiana from 800–877–8339. haplotypes were identified in the northeastern California, northern SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: southwest, with a common one being Nevada, southwestern Idaho, and found in most populations (Ramey Oregon to O. c. nelsoni of the Great Background 1995, pp. 431–432). The distribution of Basin desert form. Based on genetic and It is our intent to discuss only those mtDNA variants in the southwest did morphometric data, Wehausen and topics directly relevant to the not support the recognition of O. c. Ramey (2000, p. 156) concluded that designation of critical habitat in this cremnobates, O. c. mexicana, and O. c. bighorn sheep in the Sierra Nevada rule. For more information on the Sierra nelsoni as distinct and separate should be recognized as a separate Nevada bighorn sheep, refer to the final subspecies, but the mtDNA analysis did subspecies of O. canadensis, but they VerDate Aug<31>2005 13:15 Aug 04, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\05AUR2.SGM 05AUR2 dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES2 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 5, 2008 / Rules and Regulations 45535 did not recommend a change in detailed description of Sierra Nevada (space) is important to allow genetic nomenclature at that time. bighorn sheep habitat throughout its exchange between Sierra Nevada In a recent investigation of the range. They prefer open ground to better bighorn sheep herds. The population taxonomy of Sierra Nevada bighorn detect predators and allow enough time ecology of bighorn sheep has been sheep, Wehausen et al. (2005) to reach steep, rocky terrain (escape described as a metapopulation with reexamined the history of bighorn sheep habitat) (Wehausen 1980, p. 81). Forests geographically distinct herds interacting nomenclature. Grinnell (1912, p. 144) and thick brush are usually avoided if in a network (Schwartz et al. 1986, p. recognized bighorn sheep from the possible (65 FR 21; January 3, 2000). 184; Bleich et al. 1990, pp. 384–388). Sierra Nevada of California as a distinct Most of the sheep live at higher The movements of rams between herds subspecies, Ovis cervina (= canadensis) elevations (10,000–14,000 ft (3,050– can counteract the effects of inbreeding sierrae, designating a 5-year-old ram as 4,270 m)) in subalpine and alpine areas that can develop with small, isolated the type specimen. Cowan (1940, p. 556) during the summer (65 FR 21; January populations (Schwartz et al. 1986, pp. did not recognize the subspecies O. c. 3, 2000). During winter, these sheep 182–185). sierrae as valid, but included animals occupy high-elevation, windswept from the Sierra Nevada as O. c. ridges and tend to prefer south-facing Previous Federal Actions californiana. Wehausen and Ramey slopes where snow melts more readily On April 20, 1999, we published an (2000, pp. 153–157) reassigned (Jones 1950, pp. 44–45; McCullough and emergency rule listing the Sierra Nevada specimens from north of the central Schneegas 1966, p. 71; Wehausen 1980, DPS of the California bighorn sheep as Sierra Nevada to O. c. nelsoni and O. c. pp. 86–87) or migrate to lower endangered (64 FR 19300), providing canadensis. They kept the name O. c. elevations (4,800 ft (1,460 m)) in emergency protection to the DPS until californiana for bighorn sheep in central sagebrush-steppe areas to avoid deep such time that we could complete the and southern Sierra Nevada (Wehausen snow and to find forage.
Recommended publications
  • Cottonwood Lakes / New Army Pass Trail

    Cottonwood Lakes / New Army Pass Trail

    Inyo National Forest Cottonwood Lakes / New Army Pass Trail Named for the cottonwood trees which were located at the original trailhead in the Owens Valley, the Cottonwood Lakes are home to California's state fish, the Golden Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss aguabonita). The lakes are located in an alpine basin at the southern end of the John Muir Wilder- ness. They are surrounded by high peaks of the Sierra Nevada, including Cirque Peak and Mt. Lang- ley. The New Army Pass Trail provides access to Sequoia National Park and the Pacific Crest Trail. Trailhead Facilities: Water: Yes Bear Resistant Food Storage Lockers: Yes Campgrounds: Cottonwood Lakes Trailhead Campground is located at the trailhead. Visitors with stock may use Horseshoe Meadow Equestrian Camp, located nearby. On The Trail: Food Storage: Food, trash and scented items must be stored in bear-resistant containers. Camping: Use existing campsites. Camping is prohibited within 25 feet of the trail, and within 100 feet of water. Human Waste: Bury human waste 6”-8” deep in soil, at least 100 feet from campsites, trails, and water. Access: Campfires: Campfires are prohibited above 10,400 ft. The trailhead is located approximately 24 miles southwest of Lone Pine, CA. From Highway Pets: Pets must be under control at all times. 395 in Lone Pine, turn west onto Whitney Portal Additional Regulations: Information about Kings Road. Drive 3.5 miles and turn south (left) onto Canyon National Park regulations is available at Horseshoe Meadow Road. Travel approximately www.nps.gov/seki, www.fs.usda.gov/goto/inyo/ 20 miles, turn right and follow signs to the cottonwoodlakestrail or at Inyo National Forest Cottonwood LAKES Trailhead.
  • THE YOSEMITE by John Muir CHAPTER I The

    THE YOSEMITE by John Muir CHAPTER I The

    THE YOSEMITE By John Muir CHAPTER I The Approach to the Valley When I set out on the long excursion that finally led to California I wandered afoot and alone, from Indiana to the Gulf of Mexico, with a plant-press on my back, holding a generally southward course, like the birds when they are going from summer to winter. From the west coast of Florida I crossed the gulf to Cuba, enjoyed the rich tropical flora there for a few months, intending to go thence to the north end of South America, make my way through the woods to the headwaters of the Amazon, and float down that grand river to the ocean. But I was unable to find a ship bound for South America--fortunately perhaps, for I had incredibly little money for so long a trip and had not yet fully recovered from a fever caught in the Florida swamps. Therefore I decided to visit California for a year or two to see its wonderful flora and the famous Yosemite Valley. All the world was before me and every day was a holiday, so it did not seem important to which one of the world's wildernesses I first should wander. Arriving by the Panama steamer, I stopped one day in San Francisco and then inquired for the nearest way out of town. "But where do you want to go?" asked the man to whom I had applied for this important information. "To any place that is wild," I said. This reply startled him. He seemed to fear I might be crazy and therefore the sooner I was out of town the better, so he directed me to the Oakland ferry.
  • No Ring Fracture in Mono Basin, California

    No Ring Fracture in Mono Basin, California

    No ring fracture in Mono Basin, California Wes Hildreth, Judy Fierstein†, and Juliet Ryan-Davis§ Volcano Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA ABSTRACT influenced its vent pattern. The apparently rhyolite volcanoes. Kistler mapped a shear zone arcuate chain actually consists of three lin- in Mesozoic granitoids that he interpreted as a In Mono Basin, California, USA, a near- ear segments that reflect Quaternary tec- segment of a much broader ring fracture that he circular ring fracture 12 km in diameter was tonic influence and not Cretaceous inheri- postulated to circle beneath the youthful chain proposed by R.W. Kistler in 1966 to have tance. A rhyolitic magma reservoir under of Mono Craters’ rhyolite domes (Fig. 2). The originated as the protoclastic margin of the the central segment of the Mono chain has following critique of Kistler’s ring fracture hy- Cretaceous Aeolian Buttes pluton, to have erupted many times in the late Holocene and pothesis does not diminish our admiration for been reactivated in the middle Pleistocene, as recently as 700 years ago. The ring frac- his pioneering geologic investigation of one of and to have influenced the arcuate trend of ture idea, however, prompted several geo- the more complex and precipitous terrains of the the chain of 30 young (62–0.7 ka) rhyolite physical investigations that sought a much western USA. domes called the Mono Craters. In view of broader magma body, but none identified a Our reinvestigation assembles geologic and the frequency and recency of explosive erup- low-density or low-velocity anomaly beneath geophysical evidence that bears upon the ring tions along the Mono chain, and because the purported 12-km-wide ring, which we fracture hypothesis and Quaternary magmatism.
  • 01.04.21. Inyo NF Q2 SOPA FY2021

    01.04.21. Inyo NF Q2 SOPA FY2021

    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 01/01/2021 to 03/31/2021 Inyo National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Higgins test - Forest products In Progress: Expected:11/2020 11/2020 Nicholas Vercruysse EA Objection Period Legal Notice Actual: 11/13/2020 703/944-7650 nicholas.vercruysse@u *NEW LISTING* 11/06/2020 sda.gov Description: Test Project Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Test Project. Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Nancy Rusho 228, subpart A. Orders DEIS NOA in Federal Register 202-731-9196 EIS 09/13/2018 [email protected] Est. FEIS NOA in Federal Register 11/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations apply to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the US mining laws. More Information is available at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/science-technology/geology/minerals/locatable-minerals/current-revisions. Test Project TEST - Fuels management Completed Actual: 11/02/2020 04/2021 Kelly Weber EA 801-975-3356 [email protected] *NEW LISTING* Description: test test test Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units.
  • 51. Last Chance Meadow (Ball 1976, Dedecker 1975A, Inyo National Forest 1982A) Location This Established RNA Is Located on the Inyo National Forest

    51. Last Chance Meadow (Ball 1976, Dedecker 1975A, Inyo National Forest 1982A) Location This Established RNA Is Located on the Inyo National Forest

    51. Last Chance Meadow (Ball 1976, DeDecker 1975a, Inyo National Forest 1982a) Location This established RNA is located on the Inyo National Forest. It lies on the E. side of the crest of the S. Sierra Nevada about 13 miles (21 km) SW. of Lone Pine. It lies within portions of sects. 13, 14, 23, and 24 T17S, R35E MDBM (36°27'N., 118°9'W.), USGS Cirque Peak quad (fig. 104). Ecological subsection – Glaciated Batholith (M261Eo). Target Element Foxtail Pine (Pinus balfouriana) Distinctive Features Foxtail Pine Forests: Foxtail pine is a principal dominant of the S. Sierra subalpine forests, yet little ecological information exists for these forests. Figure 104—Last Factors limiting growth, structure, productivity, and distribution of the S. Sierra Chance Meadow stands are not clearly understood, nor is the role of fire, nor the explanation for RNA the extremely sparse understory characteristic of the type. The extensive stands at this RNA, over a variety of site conditions, could also prove useful in a comparative study with the N. California populations of foxtail pine Dashed line = represented at Crater Creek cRNA, Mount Eddy RNA, and Sugar Creek cRNA. Ecological study area; The information gathered in this survey and by the Laboratory of Tree-Ring Solid gray line = RNA Research (cited in ecological survey) on growth of foxtail pine suggests that Boundary local dominants typically exceed 600 years, attaining ages of 1000-1500 years (fig. 105). The ease of access (edge of RNA only 0.5 mile [0.8 km] from paved road) also will facilitate and encourage research on this typically rather inaccessible forest type.
  • Wtc 1803C.Pdf

    Wtc 1803C.Pdf

    WTC Officers WTC Says Congratulations! By Kay Novotny See page 8 for contact info WTC Chair Scott Nelson Long Beach Area Chair KC Reid Area Vice Chair Dave Meltzer Area Trips Mike Adams Area Registrar Jean Konnoff WTC would like to congratulate 2 of their Orange County leaders on their recognition at the annual Area Chair Sierra Club Angeles Chapter Awards Edd Ruskowitz Banquet. This event took place on May 6th, 2007, Area Vice Chair at the Brookside Country Club in Pasadena. Barry John Cyran Holchin, right, who is an “M”rated leader, and who WTC Outings Chair and Area Trips divided his time last year between Long Tom McDonnell Beach/South Bay’s WTC groups 2 and 3, received a Area Registrar conservation service award. These awards are given Kirt Smoot to Sierra Club members who deserve special San Gabriel Valley recognition for noteworthy service they have ren- Area Chair dered to the Angeles Chapter. Dawn Burkhardt Bob Beach, left, another “M” rated leader, who is Area Vice Chair Shannon Wexler Long Beach/South Bay’s Group 1 assistant leader, Area Trips received the prestigious Chester Versteeg Outings Helen Qian Plaque, which is the highest outings leadership Area Registrar award conferred by the Angeles Chapter. It is James Martens awarded to a Sierra Club member who has pro- vided long-term and outstanding leadership in furthering the enjoyment and safety of the outings program. West Los Angeles Congratulations, Barry and Bob! We all appreciate your hard work and dedication to the WTC program. Area Chair Gerard Lewis Area Vice Chair Kathy Rich Area Trips Graduations Marc Hertz Area Registrar Graduations are currently scheduled for October 20 and 21 at Indian Cove in Joshua Tree National Park.
  • Peak Bagging

    Peak Bagging

    Peak Bagging: (complete award size: 8" x 6") Program and Awards Offered by the HIGH ADVENTURE TEAM Greater Los Angeles Area Council Boy Scouts of America The High Adventure Team of the Greater Los Angeles Area Council-Boy Scouts of America is a volunteer group of Scouters which operates under the direction of GLAAC-Camping Services. Its mission is to develop and promote outdoor activities within the Council and by its many Units. It conducts training programs, sponsors High Adventure awards, publishes specialized literature such as Hike Aids and The Trail Head and promotes participation in summer camp, in High Adventure activities such as backpacking, peak climbing, and conservation, and in other Council programs. Anyone who is interested in the GLAAC-HAT and its many activities is encouraged to direct an inquiry to the GLAAC-Camping Services or visit our web site at http://www.glaac-hat.org/. The GLAAC-HAT meets on the evening of the first Tuesday of each month at 7:30 pm in the Cushman Watt Scout Center, 2333 Scout Way, Los Angeles, CA 90026. These meetings are open to all Scouters. REVISIONS Jan 2016 General revision. Peak Bagger Peak list: Tom Thorpe removed Mt. San Antonio, added Blackrock Dick Rose Mountain. Mini-Peak Bagger list: removed Dawson Peak and Pine Mountain No. 1. Renamed "Suicide Peak" to "Suicide Rock". Updated "General Requirements" section. Jan 2005 New document incorporating Program Announcements 2 and 3. Prepared by Lyle Whited and composed by John Hainey. (Mt. Markham, summit trail) Peak Bagging Program and Awards
  • Alpine Ecosystems

    Alpine Ecosystems

    TWENTY-NINE Alpine Ecosystems PHILIP W. RUNDEL and CONSTANCE I. MILLAR Introduction Alpine ecosystems comprise some of the most intriguing hab­ writing about the alpine meadows of the Sierra Nevada, felt itats of the world for the stark beauty of their landscapes and his words were inadequate to describe “the exquisite beauty for the extremes of the physical environment that their resi­ of these mountain carpets as they lie smoothly outspread in dent biota must survive. These habitats lie above the upper the savage wilderness” (Muir 1894). limit of tree growth but seasonally present spectacular flo­ ral shows of low-growing herbaceous perennial plants. Glob­ ally, alpine ecosystems cover only about 3% of the world’s Defining Alpine Ecosystems land area (Körner 2003). Their biomass is low compared to shrublands and woodlands, giving these ecosystems only a Alpine ecosystems are classically defined as those communi­ minor role in global biogeochemical cycling. Moreover, spe­ ties occurring above the elevation of treeline. However, defin­ cies diversity and local endemism of alpine ecosystems is rela­ ing the characteristics that unambiguously characterize an tively low. However, alpine areas are critical regions for influ­ alpine ecosystem is problematic. Defining alpine ecosystems encing hydrologic flow to lowland areas from snowmelt. based on presence of alpine-like communities of herbaceous The alpine ecosystems of California present a special perennials is common but subject to interpretation because case among alpine regions of the world. Unlike most alpine such communities may occur well below treeline, while other regions, including the American Rocky Mountains and the areas well above treeline may support dense shrub or matted European Alps (where most research on alpine ecology has tree cover.
  • Designation of Critical Habitat for the Sierra Nevada Bighorn Sheep (Ovis Canadensis Californiana) and Proposed Taxonomic Revision; Proposed Rule

    Designation of Critical Habitat for the Sierra Nevada Bighorn Sheep (Ovis Canadensis Californiana) and Proposed Taxonomic Revision; Proposed Rule

    Wednesday, July 25, 2007 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for the Sierra Nevada Bighorn Sheep (Ovis canadensis californiana) and Proposed Taxonomic Revision; Proposed Rule VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:27 Jul 24, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\25JYP2.SGM 25JYP2 rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2 40956 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 25, 2007 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (TDD), call the Federal Information including or excluding any areas that Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. exhibit those impacts; and Fish and Wildlife Service SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: (6) Whether we could improve or modify our approach to designating 50 CFR Part 17 Public Comments Solicited critical habitat in any way to provide for RIN 1018–AV05 We intend that any final action greater public participation and resulting from this proposal will be as understanding, or to better Endangered and Threatened Wildlife accurate and as effective as possible. accommodate public concerns and and Plants; Designation of Critical Therefore, we seek comments or comments. Habitat for the Sierra Nevada Bighorn suggestions on this proposed rule. We If you wish to comment, you may Sheep (Ovis canadensis californiana) particularly seek comments concerning: submit your comments and materials and Proposed Taxonomic Revision (1) The reasons why we should or concerning this proposal by any one of should not designate habitat as ‘‘critical several methods (see ADDRESSES). If you AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, habitat’’ under section 4 of the Act (16 use e-mail to submit your comments, Interior.
  • Mono County Community Development Department P.O

    Mono County Community Development Department P.O

    Mono County Community Development Department P.O. Box 347 Planning Division P.O. Box 8 Mammoth Lakes, CA 93546 Bridgeport, CA 93517 (760) 924-1800, fax 924-1801 (760) 932-5420, fax 932-5431 [email protected] www.monocounty.ca.gov March 2007 MONO BASIN WATERSHED ASSESSMENT 1. Introduction Watershed approach California watershed programs and Mono County’s involvement What is a watershed assessment? Publicly perceived problems and issues Water quantity Water quality Aquatic habitat Recreation Wildfire Invasive species List of assorted issues Publicly perceived key resources Driving questions Watershed boundaries 2. Descriptive geography Climate Precipitation Snowpack Air temperature Wind Evaporation Climate change impacts Topography Geology and soils Upland vegetation Special-status plants Wildfire history and risk 3. Riparian areas and wetlands Rush Creek Parker Creek Walker Creek Bohler Creek Horse Creek Lee Vining Creek Post Office Creek Mill Creek Planning / Building / Code Compliance / Environmental / Collaborative Planning Team (CPT) Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) / Local Transportation Commission (LTC) / Regional Planning Advisory Committees (RPACs Wilson Creek DeChambeau Creek 4. Fish and wildlife Fish Invasive species Wildlife 5. Human history and land use Land use Agriculture Timber harvesting Mining Gravel extraction Roads Hydroelectric development Residential development Recreation Land ownership and interagency cooperation 6. Descriptive hydrology Runoff generation processes Water balance Streamflow averages and extremes Floods and droughts Lakes Groundwater Diversions and storage Water rights, use and management Domestic water systems Lee Vining Public Utility District Lundy Mutual Water Company June Lake Public Utility District Conway Ranch Wastewater treatment and disposal 7. Descriptive geomorphology Stream channels Surface erosion Hillslope processes Sediment transport Human influences Restoration 8.
  • 66814 FSPLT2 054055.Pdf

    66814 FSPLT2 054055.Pdf

    The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. ii Table of Contents Chapter 1 Purpose of and Need for Action ........................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Description of the Allotments ............................................................................................................. 3 1.2.1 Dexter Creek Allotment .............................................................................................................. 4 1.2.2 June Lake Allotment ..................................................................................................................
  • Yosemite Guide

    Yosemite Guide

    G 83 after a major snowfall. major a after Note: Service to stops 15, 16, 17, and 18 may stop stop may 18 and 17, 16, 15, stops to Service Note: Third Class Mail Class Third Postage and Fee Paid Fee and Postage US Department Interior of the December 17, 2008 - February 17, 2009 17, February - 2008 17, December Guide Yosemite Park National Yosemite America Your Experience US Department Interior of the Service Park National 577 PO Box CA 95389 Yosemite, Experience Your America Yosemite National Park Vol. 34, Issue No.1 Inside: 01 Welcome to Yosemite 05 Programs and Events 06 Services and Facilities 10 Special Feature: Lincoln & Yosemite Dec ‘08 - Feb ‘09 Yosemite Falls. Photo by Christine White Loberg Where to Go and What to Do in Yosemite National Park December 17, 2008 - February 17, 2009 Yosemite Guide Experience Your America Yosemite National Park Yosemite Guide December 17, 2008 - February 17, 2009 Welcome to Yosemite Keep this Guide with You to Get the Most Out of Your Trip to Yosemite National Park information on topics such as camping and hiking. Keep this guide with you as you make your way through the park. Pass it along to friends and family when you get home. Save it as a memento of your trip. This guide represents the collaborative energy of the National Park Service, The Yosemite Fund, DNC Parks & Resorts at Yosemite, Yosemite Association, The Ansel Adams Gallery, and Yosemite Institute—organizations dedicated to Yosemite and to making Illustration by Lawrence W. Duke your visit enjoyable and inspiring (see page 11).