Aspirant Peers: Distance of Peers from WT
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.36 Aspirant Peers: Table
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.37 Technical Notes for Data Slides
• Data for WTAMU are represented by MAROON bars. • Data for all peers are represented by GRAY bars. • The vertical RED line on each slide represents the mean value for that specific data point.
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.38 Aspirant Peers: Full-time Equivalent Enrollment
Note: FTE enrollment is a measure of institutional size that normalizes the mix of full−time and part−time students.
Wright State University−Main Campus
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
East Tennessee State University
University of Nebraska at Omaha
Indiana State University
University of West Georgia
Aspirant Peers Aspirant Idaho State University
Tennessee Technological University
Valdosta State University
West Texas A&M University
University of Louisiana at Monroe
0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.39 Aspirant Peers: Fall-to-Fall Retention (First-time, Full-time students)
Note: This retention rate is a key performance indicator of institutional effectiveness used by many universities and organizations across higher education.
University of Nebraska at Omaha
University of Louisiana at Monroe
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
Tennessee Technological University
University of West Georgia
Idaho State University
Aspirant Peers Aspirant East Tennessee State University
Valdosta State University
Wright State University−Main Campus
West Texas A&M University
Indiana State University
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.40 Aspirant Peers: 6-year Graduation Rate
Note: Graduation rate is a key performance indicator of institutional effectiveness used by many universities and organizations across higher education.
Tennessee Technological University
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
University of West Georgia
University of Nebraska at Omaha
Indiana State University
Wright State University−Main Campus
Aspirant Peers Aspirant East Tennessee State University
West Texas A&M University
Valdosta State University
University of Louisiana at Monroe
Idaho State University
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.41 Aspirant Peers: Degrees Awarded per FTE
Note: This locally−created metric divides total degrees awarded by student FTE to make 'apples−to−apples' comparisons across institutions with different sizes of enrollment.
University of Nebraska at Omaha
Wright State University−Main Campus
West Texas A&M University
East Tennessee State University
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
Valdosta State University
Aspirant Peers Aspirant Tennessee Technological University
University of Louisiana at Monroe
University of West Georgia
Indiana State University
Idaho State University
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.42 Aspirant Peers: Doctoral Degrees Awarded
East Tennessee State University
Idaho State University
Wright State University−Main Campus
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
University of Louisiana at Monroe
Indiana State University
Aspirant Peers Aspirant Valdosta State University
University of West Georgia
University of Nebraska at Omaha
Tennessee Technological University
West Texas A&M University
0 50 100 150 200 250
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.43 Aspirant Peers: Academic Program Similarity Score
Note: This locally−created metric calculates how similar an institution's academic program mix is when compared to the target institution (WTAMU), which is why WTAMU does not have a score. Score range is 0−100. Lower scores are better.
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
University of Louisiana at Monroe
East Tennessee State University
University of Nebraska at Omaha
Wright State University−Main Campus
University of West Georgia
Aspirant Peers Aspirant Idaho State University
Indiana State University
Tennessee Technological University
Valdosta State University
West Texas A&M University
0 2 4 6
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.44 Aspirant Peers: % of Adult Undergraduates (25-64)
Note: This percentage provides a rough estimate of how many 'non−traditional' students are enrolled at each institution.
Idaho State University
University of Nebraska at Omaha
West Texas A&M University
Wright State University−Main Campus
East Tennessee State University
Valdosta State University
Aspirant Peers Aspirant Indiana State University
Tennessee Technological University
University of Louisiana at Monroe
University of West Georgia
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.45 Aspirant Peers: Research Expenditures per FTE
Note: This metric shows how much an institution spends per FTE student to produce research outcomes. This is an outcome that will need to increase as WTAMU works toward becoming a Regionally Responsive Research University.
Wright State University−Main Campus
Idaho State University
Tennessee Technological University
Indiana State University
East Tennessee State University
University of Nebraska at Omaha
Aspirant Peers Aspirant University of Louisiana at Monroe
West Texas A&M University
University of West Georgia
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
Valdosta State University
$0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.46 Aspirant Peers: Graduate Enrollment as Percentage of Total Enrollment
Note: This percentage shows the proportion of graduate students in the student body.
Wright State University−Main Campus
West Texas A&M University
Valdosta State University
East Tennessee State University
University of Nebraska at Omaha
Indiana State University
Aspirant Peers Aspirant University of West Georgia
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
University of Louisiana at Monroe
Idaho State University
Tennessee Technological University
0% 10% 20%
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.47 Aspirant Peers: % Undergraduates Enrolled Only in Distance Courses
Note: This is an important metric as WTAMU explores potential growth in distance education at the undergraduate level.
West Texas A&M University
University of Louisiana at Monroe
Indiana State University
Valdosta State University
Idaho State University
University of West Georgia
Aspirant Peers Aspirant University of Nebraska at Omaha
East Tennessee State University
Tennessee Technological University
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
Wright State University−Main Campus
0% 5% 10%
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.48 Aspirant Peers: % Graduate Students Enrolled Only in Distance Courses
Note: This is an important metric as WTAMU explores potential growth in distance education at the graduate level.
West Texas A&M University
University of West Georgia
Valdosta State University
Indiana State University
Tennessee Technological University
Idaho State University
Aspirant Peers Aspirant University of Louisiana at Monroe
East Tennessee State University
University of Nebraska at Omaha
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
Wright State University−Main Campus
0% 20% 40% 60%
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.49 Aspirant Peers: % of Undergraduate Students who are Women
Note: This metric indicates the gender distribution at each institution.
University of Louisiana at Monroe
University of West Georgia
Valdosta State University
East Tennessee State University
West Texas A&M University
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
Aspirant Peers Aspirant Indiana State University
Idaho State University
Wright State University−Main Campus
University of Nebraska at Omaha
Tennessee Technological University
0% 20% 40% 60%
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.50 Aspirant Peers: % of Undergraduate Students who are White
Note: This metric provides a rough estimate of diversity at each institution.
East Tennessee State University
Tennessee Technological University
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
Wright State University−Main Campus
University of Nebraska at Omaha
Idaho State University
Aspirant Peers Aspirant University of Louisiana at Monroe
Indiana State University
West Texas A&M University
Valdosta State University
University of West Georgia
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.51 Aspirant Peers: Average Salary of Assistant Professors (9-month equated)
Note: Salary comparisons across institutions in different states/regions should be made with caution.
Wright State University−Main Campus
University of Nebraska at Omaha
West Texas A&M University
Tennessee Technological University
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
Idaho State University
Aspirant Peers Aspirant University of Louisiana at Monroe
Indiana State University
East Tennessee State University
University of West Georgia
Valdosta State University
$0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.52 Aspirant Peers: Average Salary of Associate Professors (9-month equated)
Note: Salary comparisons across institutions in different states/regions should be made with caution.
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
Wright State University−Main Campus
University of Nebraska at Omaha
West Texas A&M University
Tennessee Technological University
University of Louisiana at Monroe
Aspirant Peers Aspirant Idaho State University
Indiana State University
East Tennessee State University
University of West Georgia
Valdosta State University
$0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.53 Aspirant Peers: Average Salary of Professors (9-month equated)
Note: Salary comparisons across institutions in different states/regions should be made with caution.
Wright State University−Main Campus
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
West Texas A&M University
University of Nebraska at Omaha
Tennessee Technological University
Indiana State University
Aspirant Peers Aspirant East Tennessee State University
University of Louisiana at Monroe
Idaho State University
University of West Georgia
Valdosta State University
$0 $30,000 $60,000 $90,000
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.54 Aspirant Peers: Student-to-Faculty Ratio
Note: This ratio shows the number of FTE students to FTE instructional staff. WTAMU's ratio was 22:1 in 2014−2015. Lower ratios indicate the institution employs more faculty per student.
Wright State University−Main Campus
West Texas A&M University
University of Louisiana at Monroe
University of West Georgia
Indiana State University
Valdosta State University
Aspirant Peers Aspirant Tennessee Technological University
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
East Tennessee State University
University of Nebraska at Omaha
Idaho State University
0 5 10 15 20
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.55 Aspirant Peers: Instructional, Research, and Public Service (Faculty) FTE
Note: This metric shows how many FTE staff have duties primarily related to instruction, research, and public service.
East Tennessee State University
Wright State University−Main Campus
University of Nebraska at Omaha
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
Idaho State University
Indiana State University
Aspirant Peers Aspirant Valdosta State University
Tennessee Technological University
University of West Georgia
West Texas A&M University
University of Louisiana at Monroe
0 250 500 750
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.56 Aspirant Peers: Total Faculty and Staff FTE
Note: This metric shows how many total FTE staff are employed by each institution. This count includes all occupational categories (administrative staff, instructional/research/public service staff, etc.).
Wright State University−Main Campus
East Tennessee State University
Idaho State University
University of Nebraska at Omaha
Indiana State University
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
Aspirant Peers Aspirant University of West Georgia
Valdosta State University
Tennessee Technological University
West Texas A&M University
University of Louisiana at Monroe
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.57 Aspirant Peers: Total Price for In-State Students Living on Campus
Note: This total price calculation allows inter−institutional comparisons of the average annual cost for students who qualify for in−state tuition and live in on−campus residence halls.
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
Tennessee Technological University
East Tennessee State University
Wright State University−Main Campus
University of West Georgia
Indiana State University
Aspirant Peers Aspirant Valdosta State University
University of Nebraska at Omaha
Idaho State University
West Texas A&M University
University of Louisiana at Monroe
$0 $10,000 $20,000
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.58 Aspirant Peers: Core Revenues (Total Dollars)
Note: Core revenues include tuition and fees; government appropriations; government grants and contracts; private gifts, grants, and contracts; investment income; other operating and nonoperating sources; and other revenues and additions.
Wright State University−Main Campus
East Tennessee State University
University of Nebraska at Omaha
Idaho State University
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
Indiana State University
Aspirant Peers Aspirant Tennessee Technological University
University of West Georgia
Valdosta State University
West Texas A&M University
University of Louisiana at Monroe
$0 $100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.59 Aspirant Peers: Tuition and Fees as Percent of Core Revenues
Note: This percentage provides an estimation of how reliant an institution is on student tuition and fees as a source of revenue.
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
University of Louisiana at Monroe
Wright State University−Main Campus
Valdosta State University
West Texas A&M University
Tennessee Technological University
Aspirant Peers Aspirant University of West Georgia
Idaho State University
Indiana State University
East Tennessee State University
University of Nebraska at Omaha
0% 20% 40%
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.60 Aspirant Peers: State Appropriations as Percent of Core Revenues
Note: This percentage provides an estimation of how much support an instituion receives from the state.
Valdosta State University
Indiana State University
Idaho State University
University of West Georgia
West Texas A&M University
East Tennessee State University
Aspirant Peers Aspirant University of Nebraska at Omaha
Tennessee Technological University
Wright State University−Main Campus
University of Louisiana at Monroe
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.61 Aspirant Peers: Core Expenses (Total Dollars)
Note: This total includes expenses for instruction, research, public service, academic support, student services, institutional support, operation and maintenance of plant, depreciation, scholarships and fellowships, interest, and other operating and non−operating expenses.
Wright State University−Main Campus
East Tennessee State University
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
Idaho State University
University of Nebraska at Omaha
Indiana State University
Aspirant Peers Aspirant Tennessee Technological University
Valdosta State University
University of West Georgia
West Texas A&M University
University of Louisiana at Monroe
$0 $100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.62 Aspirant Peers: Instruction Expenses as a Percent Core Expenses
Note: This percentage provides an estimation of how much an institution spends on instructional expenses compared to other core expenses.
University of Nebraska at Omaha
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
East Tennessee State University
University of West Georgia
Indiana State University
Tennessee Technological University
Aspirant Peers Aspirant Idaho State University
Valdosta State University
University of Louisiana at Monroe
West Texas A&M University
Wright State University−Main Campus
0% 20% 40% 60%
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.63 Aspirant Peers: Research Expenses as a Percent Core Expenses
Note: This percentage provides an estimation of how much an institution spends on research expenses compared to other core expenses. Not all institutions in this Comparison Peer group reported research expenses in 2014−2015.
Wright State University−Main Campus
Idaho State University
Tennessee Technological University
Indiana State University
University of Nebraska at Omaha
University of Louisiana at Monroe
Aspirant Peers Aspirant West Texas A&M University
East Tennessee State University
University of West Georgia
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
Valdosta State University
0.0% 2.5% 5.0% 7.5% 10.0%
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.64 Aspirant Peers: Student Service Expenses as a Percent Core Expenses
Note: This percentage provides an estimation of how much an institution spends on student service expenses compared to other core expenses.
Valdosta State University
Tennessee Technological University
University of West Georgia
University of Louisiana at Monroe
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
Indiana State University
Aspirant Peers Aspirant East Tennessee State University
Wright State University−Main Campus
University of Nebraska at Omaha
West Texas A&M University
Idaho State University
0% 5% 10% 15%
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.65 Aspirant Peers: Core Expenses as a Percent of Core Revenues
Note: This percentage provides a rough estimate of institutional efficiency. An institution that is close to 100% on this metric is investing most of their core revenues in core areas essential to the successful operation of the university.
Wright State University−Main Campus
Indiana University of Pennsylvania−Main Campus
Valdosta State University
West Texas A&M University
East Tennessee State University
Tennessee Technological University
Aspirant Peers Aspirant University of Louisiana at Monroe
University of West Georgia
Idaho State University
Indiana State University
University of Nebraska at Omaha
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Developmental Draft -- Not For Publication 5.66