DOCSLIB.ORG

Himalayan Studies and Interdisciplinarity Workshop

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Himalayan Studies and Interdisciplinarity Workshop HIMALAYA, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies Volume 39 Number 1 Article 24 July 2019 Himalayan Studies and Interdisciplinarity Workshop Priyanka Chatterjee Sikkim University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/himalaya Recommended Citation Chatterjee, Priyanka. 2019. Himalayan Studies and Interdisciplinarity Workshop. HIMALAYA 39(1). Available at: https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/himalaya/vol39/iss1/24 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This Conference Report is brought to you for free and open access by the DigitalCommons@Macalester College at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in HIMALAYA, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. length, also engaged with meaningful presentations and interactions. In her inaugural speech, Maitreyee Choudhury (Director, CHS) stressed the need for interdiscipliarity to continue within Himalayan studies. The chief guest Sanchari Roy Mukherjee (Dean, Faculty Arts Commerce & Law, NBU) emphasized the growing importance of science and technological studies in the Himalayas and the consequential Himalayan Studies and politics of knowledge involved in Interdisciplinarity Workshop such developments in the context of the Himalayas. Anup K Dutta Centre for Himalayan Studies (CHS) (NBU) emphatically put forth the University of North Bengal (NBU), India need for conceiving the Himalayas December 11-12, 2018 as a multi-state formation and for defamiliarizing social science The World Mountain Day was research practices from the received uniquely observed at the Centre notions of borders and boundaries if for Himalayan Studies (CHS) at the Himalayan studies is to be continued University of North Bengal (NBU), in a persuasive manner. In his erudite India through a two-day workshop keynote address, Bani Prasanna (December 11-12, 2018) on the Misra (formerly with CHS, NBU) theme “Himalayan Studies and reflected upon the philosophy of the Interdisciplinarity.” The workshop’s social sciences and the grooming broad theme intended to create of interdisciplinarity in the social a space for dialogue among those sciences while elaborating on the who examine the Himalayas, with problems and prospects of particular reference to Nepal, from adopting interdisciplinarity in different disciplinary vantage points. Himalayan studies. Although the pitched theme attracted an expected mix of scholars from The first academic session began different disciplines such as History, with two significant presentations Political Science, Anthropology, on Nepal studies and the Himalayas. Sociology, Economics, Geography, Pratyoush Onta (Martin Chautari, and even Comparative Literature, the Nepal) shared his almost thirty gathering lacked scholars specializing years experience of editing an in ecology and security/strategic academic journal, Studies in Nepali studies. However, the workshop History and Society (SINHAS), and made a modest attempt to defy reflected upon the extent to which the truism that Himalayan studies SINHAS could attain the goal of scholarship emerged mostly out of interdisciplinarity while reflecting the contributions made from outside on the kind of Himalayan studies the Himalayas. With its declared scholarship the journal has been focus on Nepal, the workshop opened encouraging. Bhaskar Gautam (North up the floor for scholars, mostly from South Collectives, Biratnagar, Nepal) Nepal, to talk about Nepal. There examined the diverse perspectives were also scholars from elsewhere of understanding the Himalayas in on the Indian subcontinent who, general while focusing particularly having worked on Nepal at some on the perception adopted by the 238 | HIMALAYA Spring 2019 international development agencies an ethnographic study of the Raxaul to her, sets limits to the discursivity (ICIMOD, for example) to understand railway site on the Indo-Nepal border of anthropological practices in the Himalayas in particular. region. Chudamani Basnet (South the Global South. Discussant Jayjit Asian University, New Delhi) spoke Sarkar (Raiganj University, West The three papers presented in on intermarriage between Madhesi Bengal) queried Shakya about how the second academic session were men and Pahadi women in southern the theories of the Global South broadly focused on issues related Nepal, and examined the crisscrosses could assist our understanding of the to migration and social relations. between caste and ethnic boundaries Himalayas, which is conventionally Gaurav KC’s jointly authored vis-à-vis the typification of family driven by a tendency of reversing paper with Pranab Kharel (both relations through newer versions of the telos. Shakya maintained that of the Kathmandu School of Law, gendered prototypes. the telos not only needs to be Purbanchal University, Kathmandu) reversed but indeed needs to be attempted to make an historical There were three presentations in the overcome. Her engagement with the reappraisal of the tellurian foothold last session, followed by a roundtable theories of the Global South would of migrating Nepalis in northeast on the workshop theme. Mukund primarily be through a critique of India, Burma, and Tibet with a claim Giri (Sikkim Government College, developmentalism, she said. that much of our understanding Gangtok) made an interesting with respect to Nepali migration is presentation on the various One of the major attractions of the based on the standpoint of military dimensions of an interdisciplinary workshop was a roundtable on the history. As an alternative approach, approach and mapped out the workshop’s main theme of Himalayan they pitched the need for developing extent of interdisciplinary research studies and interdisciplinarity. a non-military and non-janajati in the existing studies on the Moderated by Pratyoush Onta, the historical approach to understanding Communist movement in Nepal. two-hours-long roundtable involved the Nepali exodus and its historicity. Based on a socio-historical approach, serious discussions on issues such The discussant Binayak Sundas Lokranjan Parajuli (Martin Chautari, as the need to promote regional (CHS, NBU), however, commented Kathmandu) discussed the intricate languages in Himalayan research, that the major problem with the stories—like cold war politics, to emphasize intra-institutional paper was that it had no reference ideological impetus, Indian interest, cross-disciplinary practices, to to any particular time frame upon and concerns for indigeneity in foster regional scholarship between which it was focused, which indeed higher education system—involved India and Nepal even in the absence glossed over the complex nuances in the foundation of Tribhuvan of adequate funds, to increase an of understanding such movements University, the first university of exchange of scholars and students being attached to periods. Sundas Nepal. The last paper of the workshop between both countries, and to focus also pointed out that in using the was presented by Mallika Shakya on empirical research more than on tool of oral histories, as embedded (South Asian University, New Delhi) abstract theoretical research. within family histories, the paper through audio-visual mode. Shakya’s The workshop ended with Tanka opened itself up to a classic problem video presentation focused on the B. Subba’s (North Eastern Hill of historical methods, one faced issues of being and belonging in University, Shillong) valedictory by Greek historians like Herodotus post-earthquake Nepal and the address, in which he raised three and Thucydides. This problem lies emerging politics of knowledge that important points to be addressed by in the fact that history, as such, evolved out of the ways in which the scholars studying the Himalayas: (1) becomes conditioned to a subject’s earthquakes and post-earthquake the inbuilt tendency of “home grown memory or being alive or even his scenarios were represented either in Orientalism” among practitioners conscious understanding of an event, the media or in the anthropological from within, (2) the unresolved so much so that anything beyond excursions made by various dilemma of subject-object dualism his subjective consciousness also foreign scholars. She compared the in social science research, and (3) remains beyond critical purview. In phenomenological experiences of the language of the social sciences another paper on the same panel, the earthquakes and the exuberance (implying statist language, subaltern Mithilesh Kumar (Tata Institute of of media-driven anthropological narration, bahunbadi (Brahmanical) Social Sciences, Patna) discussed an discourses with comparable discourses, gendered idioms, post- intriguing intersection of labour, situations of decolonization in social national expressions, and so on). In migration, and resistance based on sciences in Africa, which, according his note of thanks, Swatahsiddha HIMALAYA Volume 39, Number 1 | 239 Sarkar, the workshop coordinator, also noted the possibility of holding at least two similar workshops or conferences covering such areas like Indian Himalaya and Tibet-Bhutan Himalaya in the coming two years. The workshop formally ended with the screening of an award-winning documentary film, Voices of Teesta, and a discussion with the filmmaker, Minket Lepcha, followed by a short presentation by Minket Lepcha and her team on performative folk art forms in the eastern Himalayas. Priyanka Chatterjee Sikkim University 240 | HIMALAYA Spring 2019.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Editorial in the NAME of Bikasø
    Editorial IN THE NAME OF BIKAS¯ Mary Des Chene In desperate times people do the best they can. It seems that in Nepal’s bik¯as world it is always desperate times. Overwhelming needs, impending crises and unachieved goals dominate the agenda. Thus academic critiques of bik¯as projects that point to methodological or theoretical weaknesses can be deflected with the counter charge of a lack of realism. Academics can appear to development practitioners to be impractical, either mired in ground-level description or lost in clouds of theoretical reflection. In either case they can seem to be uninterested in, or incapable of producing clear guidelines for social transformation. Academic analyses of bik¯as can seem useless at best, parasitical at worst, feeding off of activities meant to meet urgent needs without contributing to those efforts. Development practitioners, in turn, can appear to academics to be mercenary, carrying out rapid superficial surveys on the basis of which major social interventions will be made. Such research and the resulting social programs can appear to be vastly uninformed about the realities they seek to assess and then change. Bik¯as studies and projects can seem poorly designed at best, immoral at worst, feeding off poverty and need without effectively alleviating them. When the infamous “real world” meets the equally infamous “ivory tower” of academia the result is too often an unproductive, even uncomprehending standoff. Both academics and development practitioners can easily believe that the other inhabits a fictional world, while they themselves best know the real condition of “the people”. This special issue of Studies in Nepali History and Society reflects on the real world of bik¯as in its Nepali avatars.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Brief
    Research No. Brief, 29 No. 29, January 2020 January‘WRITING AS2020 AN ACTIVISM’: BAREFOOT RESEARCHRESEARCH INITIATIVE IN NEPAL BRIEF ‘Writing as an Activism’: Barefoot Research Initiative in Nepal Introduction This research brief is a report on the experience of managing/executing a “barefoot research” initiative in three districts—Kapilvastu, Nawalparasi and Rupandehi—of Nepal’s Western Tarai from November 2017 to June 2019. An assessment of the intellectual landscapes of rights-based advocacy research in the Western Tarai, from which this work follows, was described earlier in Martin Chautari (2019).1 The barefoot research (hereafter BR) initiative is different from academic, participatory or action research. BR initiative argues for the inclusion of those who have been directly or indirectly denied the opportunities to do social science research and to disseminate knowledge from below. BR initiative is an attempt to explore the ways in which grassroots-based individuals may be able to claim their “right to research”2 and advocate their causes for “democratic citizenship.”3 The possibilities of BR initiative emerge out of asymmetrical arrangements. Nepal’s socio-political transitions from the Panchayat system through multi- party democracy and the civil war up until the promulgation of the new constitution in 2015 have witnessed evolving academia, civil society and public intellectuals.4 The current challenge faced in the Nepali intellectual landscape is its inability to harness and articulate grassroots-based voices that are necessary for a devolved democracy. Such disconnect is due to a peripheral blindness 1 Martin Chautari. 2019. Institutional Assessment of Rights-based Advocacy in the Western Tarai.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change in Nepal/Himalaya: a Bibliography
    CLIMATE CHANGE IN NEPAL/HIMALAYA: A BIBLIOGRAPHY Sharad Ghimire Martin Chautari Climate change discussion formally entered in Nepal in 1992, when Nepal became a party of the United National Framework Convention of Climate Change (UNFCCC) at the Rio Convention, 1992. However, Nepal and the Himalayan region were already in the academic radar of the emerging debate of climate change. For example, based on entries in this bibliography, Nakajima talked about the climate change in South Asia in 1976. In the late 1980s, when human induced climate change was getting academic recognition globally, Nepal and Himalayan region also got some attention, as shown here by Shah (1985–1986) and Gleick (1989), who, however, focused mainly on security and conflict aspects of GHGs effect and climate change. These were the initial academic concerns of climate change in the region. Climate change in the region got proper attention from scholars only in the late 1990s, for instance, see Huq (1992), Chalise (1994), Yogacharya (1996), Mirza and Dixit (1997), Nakawo et al. (1997), Shrestha et al (1999), Kalshian (1999). Their focus were on measuring greenhouse gases, identifying general impacts as well as specific impacts on water and snow /glaciers, calculation of the temperature rise and also on communication aspects of climate change. Only after 2000, particularly after 2007, climate change became one of major concerns in academia in Nepal from diverse perspectives, e.g., in the form of natural and social science research, development programs and policy making. The trend is increasing more rapidly in recent days and has generated a substantial number of literatures.
    [Show full text]
  • Federalism Is Debated in Nepal More As an ‘Ism’ Than a System
    The FEDERALISM Debate in Nepal Post Peace Agreement Constitution Making in Nepal Volume II Post Peace Agreement Constitution Making in Nepal Volume II The FEDERALISM Debate in Nepal Edited by Budhi Karki Rohan Edrisinha Published by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Support to Participatory Constitution Building in Nepal (SPCBN) 2014 United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Support to Participatory Constitution Building in Nepal (SPCBN) UNDP is the UN’s global development network, advocating for change and connecting countries to knowledge, experience and resources to help people build a better life. United Nations Development Programme UN House, Pulchowk, GPO Box: 107 Kathmandu, Nepal Phone: +977 1 5523200 Fax: +977 1 5523991, 5523986 ISBN : 978 9937 8942 1 0 © UNDP, Nepal 2014 Book Cover: The painting on the cover page art is taken from ‘A Federal Life’, a joint publication of UNDP/ SPCBN and Kathmandu University, School of Art. The publication was the culmination of an initiative in which 22 artists came together for a workshop on the concept of and debate on federalism in Nepal and then were invited to depict their perspective on the subject through art. The painting on the cover art titled ‘’Emblem” is created by Supriya Manandhar. DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in the book are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of UNDP/ SPCBN. PREFACE A new Constitution for a new Nepal drafted and adopted by an elected and inclusive Constituent Assembly (CA) is a key element of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) of November 2006 that ended a decade long Maoist insurgency.
    [Show full text]
  • Reexamining the Panchayat Era Politics of Education
    SCHOOLS AS AN ARENA OF STRUGGLE | 381 SCHOOLS AS AN ARENA OF STRUGGLE: REEXAMINING THE PANCHAYAT ERA POLITICS OF EDUCATION Lokranjan Parajuli Introduction Nepal does not have a very long history of “modern” formal education system. The Ranas who ruled the country for over a century (1846–1951) were, barring a few exceptions, against public having access to education.1 When the Rana rule ended in 1951, the literacy rate of the country was less than two percent (Pandey, K.C. and Wood 1956). In the next decade (1951–1960), after the downfall of the regime, the number of educational institutions and concomitantly the number of students/teachers grew significantly (HMG 2018 v.s.b; see Table 2) in many parts of the country, even though the political situation during that decade remained chaotic.2 During this decade, people all across the country became excited to create new avatars of themselves as individuals and as associations. There emerged associations of every hue and shade: from school managing committees to ñol sudhàr samitis (community reform committees), literary clubs, public libraries, theatre groups, Dalits’ associations, women’s associations, farmers’ associations, and traders’ associations. And of course new newspapers were started and new political parties were formed. All of these formations attracted activists from various walks of life and augmented the larger concerns of the society (see Malla 1979; Parajuli 2009). But all this changed dramatically when the “constitutional” Shah King Mahendra staged a coup d’etat in December 1960, and took over the reign of the country. “Development of education” remained one of the main mantras that the post 1960 royal regime also chanted.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Ana and One Modem House: a Spatial Ethnography of Kathmandu's Urbanizing Periphery
    I Four Ana and One Modem House: A Spatial Ethnography of Kathmandu's Urbanizing Periphery Andrew Stephen Nelson Denton, Texas M.A. University of London, School of Oriental and African Studies, December 2004 B.A. Grinnell College, December 2000 A Disse11ation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Anthropology University of Virginia May 2013 II Table of Contents Introduction Chapter 1: An Intellectual Journey to the Urban Periphery 1 Part I: The Alienation of Farm Land 23 Chapter 2: From Newar Urbanism to Nepali Suburbanism: 27 A Social History of Kathmandu’s Sprawl Chapter 3: Jyāpu Farmers, Dalāl Land Pimps, and Housing Companies: 58 Land in a Time of Urbanization Part II: The Householder’s Burden 88 Chapter 4: Fixity within Mobility: 91 Relocating to the Urban Periphery and Beyond Chapter 5: American Apartments, Bihar Boxes, and a Neo-Newari 122 Renaissance: the Dual Logic of New Kathmandu Houses Part III: The Anxiety of Living amongst Strangers 167 Chapter 6: Becoming a ‘Social’ Neighbor: 171 Ethnicity and the Construction of the Moral Community Chapter 7: Searching for the State in the Urban Periphery: 202 The Local Politics of Public and Private Infrastructure Epilogue 229 Appendices 237 Bibliography 242 III Abstract This dissertation concerns the relationship between the rapid transformation of Kathmandu Valley’s urban periphery and the social relations of post-insurgency Nepal. Starting in the 1970s, and rapidly increasing since the 2000s, land outside of the Valley’s Newar cities has transformed from agricultural fields into a mixed development of planned and unplanned localities consisting of migrants from the hinterland and urbanites from the city center.
    [Show full text]
  • Everything I Learned About Nepali Literature Is Wrong | 217
    (ALMOST) EVERYTHING I LEARNED ABOUT NEPALI LITERATURE IS WRONG | 217 Chautari Foundation Lecture 2018 (ALMOST) EVERYTHING I LEARNED ABOUT NEPALI LITERATURE IS WRONG Manjushree Thapa I’ve been rethinking my sense of Nepali literature, and am pleased to have a chance to share my thoughts at Martin Chautari, an organization that I played a very small role in founding back in the 1990s, when it was an informal discussion group among “development” workers.1 Most of us, at the time, were foreign-educated, or actual foreigners. We were well meaning, but we were seeking an intellectual life without any links to Nepal’s own intellectual traditions in the political parties, the universities, the writers and activists. It was particularly under Pratyoush Onta’s leadership that Martin Chautari developed these links and became a site where foreign-educated Nepalis, foreigners, and Nepal’s own intellectual traditions could meet for open debate. Knowledge-generation is a collective enterprise. It is not an endeavor a person undertakes in isolation. I’ve written and spoken before on the thoughts I’ll share here, first in the introduction (Thapa 2017a) to La.Lit, A Literary Magazine Volume 8 (Special issue: Translations from the Margins), which I edited (Thapa 2017b), and then at two talks for the Himalayan Studies Conference at the University of Colorado, in Boulder, in September 2017, and for the Nepal Studies Initiative at the University of Washington, in Seattle, in April 2018. This lecture is a crystallizing of those thoughts, which are still in formation. One caveat: I am not a scholar, but a writer; I am engaged in what Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak calls the “wild practice” (2012: 394).
    [Show full text]
  • The Landscape of Social Science and Humanities Journals Published from Nepal: an Analysis of Its Structural Characteristics
    THE LANDSCAPE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES JOURNALS PUBLISHED FROM NEPAL: AN ANALYSIS OF ITS STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS Pratyoush Onta Introduction As is the case elsewhere, practitioners of social science and humanities research in Nepal have created and published their own written media to communicate their findings and analyses to their academic peers, students and the interested public at large. These media have come in the form of academic articles published in journals, as stand-alone papers or chapters in edited volumes, and as full-length monographs.1 Such forms of communication are crucial to the progress of any disciplined inquiry in the social sciences and humanities. In European history, prototypes of such journals (with the word ‘journal’ in the title) had been brought into existence by the late 17th century. During the first half of the 19th century, several journals focused on specific domains of research were founded. Some of the influential journals that are still being published were established in the mid- and late-19th century by various individuals (Steig 1986). In contrast, Nepal had to wait until 1952 to see its first academic journal. This is not surprising given the intolerance of the Rana regime (1846–1951) to most forms of social inquiry.2 That said, we might still want to ask: ‘What is an academic journal?’ Perhaps a broad definition would serve our purpose here: publications described as journals by its academic editors and producers (and this can be any person, group or institution) that appear in a series that can be numbered by volume (1, 2, 3, etc.) or volume and issue combination (such as volume 1 no 1, volume 1 no 2, etc.) can be called journals.
    [Show full text]
  • CIVIL SOCIETY: MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT Annual Work Plan (Year 5) October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2020
    CIVIL SOCIETY: MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT Annual Work Plan (Year 5) October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2020 Revised, July 2020 August 30, 2019 Cooperative Agreement Number: AID -367-A-16-00007 Project Start and End Date: April 4, 2016 to April 3, 2021 Submitted to: Bishwas Rana, Agreement Officer’s Representative USAID Submitted by: Prem Raj Ojha, Deputy Chief of Party, Civil Society: Mutual Accountability Project FHI 360 GPO Box 8803, Gopal Bhawan Anamika Galli, Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal Tel: 977.1.4437173 Email: [email protected] This document was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by FHI 360. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Abbreviations and Acronyms AAOR Alternate Agreement Officer’s Representative AIN Association of International Non-Government Organizations in Nepal AMO Advocacy and Monitoring/Oversight AOR Agreement Officer’s Representative ARI Advocacy Readiness Index CA Common Assembly CAG Content Advisory Group CAR Community Action Researcher CLFS Critical Listening Feedback Sessions COVID-19 Corona Virus Disease 2019 CSC Community Score Card CS:MAP Civil Society: Mutual Accountability Project CS:MAP-HRS CS:MAP-Human Rights Strengthening CR Community Reporter CSO Civil Society Organization DCC District Coordination Committee DRR Disaster Risk Reduction DQA Data Quality Assessment EAI Equal Access International ECN Election Commission of Nepal FNJ Federation of Nepali Journalists FRF Financial
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Download (386655 Bytes)
    The (Im)possibility of Revolution and State Formation in Nepal Matjaz Pinter, Ph.D. Candidate at Maynooth University, Ireland Abstract The paper looks at Nepal’s revolution and state formation process in post-agrarian capitalism by examining anti-systemic and systemic elements of class struggle. The political articulation of the peasant question within the context of late 20th century Nepal has been widely popularized by the country’s Maoist movement. The movement has since then undergone a great political and cultural transformation from an anti-systemic party-movement into a systemic one. After more than a decade of post-revolutionary politics, we are yet to examine the historical role of the Nepalese peasantry in the light of the anti-systemic and systemic politics in Nepal, and the restructuring of capital on the South Asian periphery. The aim of the paper is to explain the legacy of the revolution in its core contradiction: today the agricultural production is not central to the reproduction of capital, but it is still an important factor in the reproduction of power relations. In Nepal this relation between revolution and state formation is the central antagonism of class struggle that can be observed through two phases consisting of anti-systemic and systemic formations. Introduction Nepal’s state formation process goes back to, what is often called, the unification of several Himalayan kingdoms that happened in the eighteenth and at the turn of the nineteenth century. The rule of the then Kingdom of Gorkha under Prithvi Narayan Shah and later the Shah dynasty, was bound to get into territorial disputes with the powerful colonizers of South Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • A Suggestive History of the First Century of Photographic Consumption in Kathmandu
    A SUGGESTIVE HISTORY OF THE FIRST CENTURY OF PHOTOGRAPHIC CONSUMPTION IN KATHMANDU Pratyoush Onta Introduction The photographs capturing scenic landscapes of Nepal – ‘medieval’ towns, terraced hill-sides, verdant fields, closely clustered village homes, mighty peaks, arid landscapes of the rain-shadow region in the western part of the country – and of people who live in these sites, have been an intricate part of the Shangri-la story associated with Nepal until very recently. The mountain kingdom, to borrow the title of a finely produced coffee-table book of portraits from Nepal by B. M. Niven (1987), as it were, could not exist without these breathtaking photographs. In the world of travel glossies, two of the most important activities that characterize our times — travel and photography — come together. In her well-known book, On Photography, critic Susan Sontag suggests that photography has developed in direct conjunction with tourism where it documents "sequences of consumption carried on outside the view of family, friends, neighbors" (1977:9). This association of photography with the packaging of Nepal as a mountain kingdom in tourism-related literature is relatively well-known. What is less known, however, is that the Nepali subjects of these glossies themselves have been consuming photography for over a century in ways that are historically significant. You can see photographs just about everywhere in Nepal today. Urban middle-class Nepalis usually have several framed photographs adorning the walls of their rooms and hundreds more in orderly kept albums or disorganized piles. While they might complain that photographs are taking too much of their cramped urban space, they continue to take more of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Liechty CV
    Curriculum Vitae Mark Liechty Professor of Anthropology and History University of Illinois at Chicago tel: (312) 413-3581 (o) BSB 2102 (M/C 027) (708) 445-9156 (h) 1007 W. Harrison fax: (312) 413-3573 Chicago, IL 60607-7139 email: [email protected] EDUCATION University of Pennsylvania, Department of Anthropology, 1986-1994 Ph.D. Anthropology dissertation advisor: Arjun Appadurai Goshen College, Goshen Indiana, 1978-1983 B.A. History; B.A. Biology Woodstock International School, Mussoorie, Uttarakhand, India, graduate, 1978 FELLOWSHIPS AND AWARDS - Kekoo Naoroji Award for Himalayan Literature, for Far Out (University of Chicago Press, 2017), 2018 - Arts & Humanities Research Council (UK), International Co-Investigator on collaborative grant, School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), Univ. of London, 2017 - present - US Dept. of State and CIES, “Fulbright Specialist” appointee, 2014 - Great Cities Institute, Univ. of Illinois at Chicago, fellow, 2010-11 - School for Advanced Research (Santa Fe), Advanced Seminar participant, March-April, 2009 - US Dept. of State (IIES) Fulbright Faculty Research Abroad Grant, 2007-08 - Institute for the Humanities, Univ. of Illinois at Chicago, fellow, 2003-04 - OVCR-AAH award, University of Illinois at Chicago, 2000 - Regents' Junior Faculty Fellowship, Univ. of California, Santa Barbara, 1997 - International Institute for Asian Studies (Leiden, The Netherlands), Post-doctoral Fellowship, 1995 - University of Pennsylvania Dissertation Fellowship, 1993-1994 - Fulbright-Hays Doctoral Dissertation Research Abroad Fellowship, 1991 - Foreign Language and Area Studies (FLAS) fellow, 1987-1990 RESEARCH INTERESTS Middle classes, class formation, media and consumer culture, tourism and tourism history, critical development studies, youth culture, 3rd World modernity, culture theory, culture history, medical anthropology; South Asia, East Asia PUBLICATIONS: Books (2017) Far Out: Countercultural Seekers and the Tourist Encounter in Nepal.
    [Show full text]