Chapter 2 Literature Review ______
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A-Lovisolo.Vp:Corelventura
Acta zoologica cracoviensia, 46(suppl.– Fossil Insects): 37-50, Kraków, 15 Oct., 2003 Searching for palaeontological evidence of viruses that multiply in Insecta and Acarina Osvaldo LOVISOLO and Oscar RÖSLER Received: 31 March, 2002 Accepted for publication: 17 Oct., 2002 LOVISOLO O., RÖSLER O. 2003. Searching for palaeontological evidence of viruses that multiply in Insecta and Acarina. Acta zoologica cracoviensia, 46(suppl.– Fossil Insects): 37-50. Abstract. Viruses are known to be agents of important diseases of Insecta and Acarina, and many vertebrate and plant viruses have arthropods as propagative vectors. There is fossil evidence of arthropod pathogens for some micro-organisms, but not for viruses. Iso- lated virions would be hard to detect but, in fossil material, it could be easier to find traces of virus infection, mainly virus-induced cellular structures (VICS), easily recognisable by electron microscopy, such as virions encapsulated in protein occlusion bodies, aggregates of membrane-bounded virus particles and crystalline arrays of numerous virus particles. The following main taxa of viruses that multiply in arthropods are discussed both for some of their evolutionary aspects and for the VICS they cause in arthropods: A. dsDNA Poxviridae, Asfarviridae, Baculoviridae, Iridoviridae, Polydnaviridae and Ascoviridae, infecting mainly Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera, Coleoptera, Diptera and Acarina; B. ssDNA Parvoviridae, infecting mainly Diptera and Lepidoptera; C. dsRNA Reoviridae and Bir- naviridae, infecting mainly Diptera, Hymenoptera and Acarina, and plant viruses also multiplying in Hemiptera; D. Amb.-ssRNA Bunyaviridae and Tenuivirus, that multiply in Diptera and Hemiptera (animal viruses) and in Thysanoptera and Hemiptera (plant vi- ruses); E. -ssRNA Rhabdoviridae, multiplying in Diptera and Acarina (vertebrate vi- ruses), and mainly in Hemiptera (plant viruses); F. -
Comparative Plant Virology, Second Edition, by Roger Hull Revision to Fundamentals of Plant Virology Written by R
COMPARATIVE PLANT VIROLOGY SECOND EDITION science & ELSEVIERtechnology books Companion Web Site: http://www.elsevierdirect.com/companions/9780123741547 Comparative Plant Virology, Second Edition, by Roger Hull Revision to Fundamentals of Plant Virology written by R. Matthews Resources for Professors: • Image bank • Virus profiles TOOLS FOR YOUR TEACHING NEEDS ALL textbooks.elsevier.com ACADEMIC PRESS To adopt this book for course use, visit http://textbooks.elsevier.com COMPARATIVE PLANT VIROLOGY SECOND EDITION ROGER HULL Emeritus Fellow Department of Disease and Stress Biology John Innes Centre Norwich, UK AMSTERDAM • BOSTON • HEIDELBERG • LONDON NEW YORK • OXFORD • PARIS • SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO • SINGAPORE • SYDNEY • TOKYO Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier Cover Credits: BSMV leaf — Mild stripe mosaic; Symptom of BSMV in barley. Image courtesy of A.O. Jackson. BSMV genome: The infectious genome (BSMV) is divided between 3 species of positive sense ssRNA that are designated a, b, and g. Image courtesy of Roger Hull. BSMV particles. Image courtesy of Roger Hull. Diagram showing systemic spread of silencing signal: The signal is generated in the initially infected cell (bottom, left hand) and spreads to about 10–15 adjacent cells where it is amplified. It moves out of the initially infected leaf via the phloem sieve tubes and then spreads throughout systemic leaves being amplified at various times. Image courtesy of Roger Hull. Elsevier Academic Press 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 400, Burlington, MA 01803, USA 525 B Street, Suite 1900, San Diego, California 92101-4495, USA 84 Theobald’s Road, London WC1X 8RR, UK This book is printed on acid-free paper. Copyright # 2009, Elsevier Inc. -
Plant Viruses As Molecular Pathogens 2001.Pdf
Jawaid A. Khan Jeanne Dijkstra Editors Plant Viruses As Molecular Pathogens Pre-publication REVIEWS, COMMENTARIES, EVALUATIONS . his book is both up-to-date and his book covers a wide range of “Tvery informative for traditional “Tsubjects, and it is refreshing to and new generations of plant virolo- have most of the chapters written by gists in both industrialized and devel- people who have not reviewed the spe- oping nations of the world. Moreover, cific topics before, which gives new per- some chapters present very interesting spectives to their coverage. As a concepts regarding the use of molecu- particular example, I refer to the chapter lar techniques to gain new insight into ‘Natural Resistance to Viruses’ by Jari long-standing pathological issues, such Valkonen; he covers the field well, and as virus evolution, host adaptation, and postulates how resistance is engendered. epidemiology. I was also pleased to see In addition, some subjects, such as the a good deal of information on plant vi- transmission of viruses by nematodes, by ruses of importance in the tropics, such fungi, or through the seed, have not been as potyviruses, begomoviruses, and reviewed for many years and have been in some emerging plant viruses transmit- need of updating. There are also some ted by fungal vectors. Altogether, a chapters dealing with molecular tech- very valuable collection of themes on niques that students and researchers will the new art and science of plant virol- find useful.” ogy.” Milton Zaitlin, PhD Francisco J. Morales, PhD Professor Emeritus, Head Virology Research Unit, Department of Plant Pathology, International Center for Tropical College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Agriculture (CIAT), Cornell University, Miami, Florida Ithaca, New York NOTES FOR PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS AND LIBRARY USERS This is an original book title published by Food Products Press®,an imprint of The Haworth Press, Inc. -
Mycoreovirus Genome Alterations: Similarities to and Differences from Rearrangements Reported for Other Reoviruses
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk REVIEW ARTICLE Provided by Frontiers - Publisher Connector published: 01 June 2012 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00186 Mycoreovirus genome alterations: similarities to and differences from rearrangements reported for other reoviruses ToruTanaka1, Ana Eusebio-Cope 1, Liying Sun2 and Nobuhiro Suzuki 1* 1 Agrivirology Laboratory, Institute of Plant Science and Bioresources, Okayama University, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan 2 State Key Laboratory Breeding Base for Zhejiang Sustainable Pest and Disease Control, Ministry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Biotechnology in Plant Protection, Institute of Virology and Biotechnology, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, P.R. China Edited by: The family Reoviridae is one of the largest virus families with genomes composed of 9–12 Joseph K. Li, Utah State University, double-stranded RNA segments. It includes members infecting organisms from protists to USA humans. It is well known that reovirus genomes are prone to various types of genome alter- Reviewed by: Dale L. Barnard, Utah State ations including intragenic rearrangement and reassortment under laboratory and natural University, USA conditions. Recently distinct genetic alterations were reported for members of the genus Kwok-YungYuen,The University of Mycoreovirus, Mycoreovirus 1 (MyRV1), and MyRV3 with 11 (S1–S11) and 12 genome seg- Hong Kong, Hong Kong ments (S1–S12), respectively. While MyRV3 S8 is lost during subculturing of infected host *Correspondence: fungal strains, MyRV1 rearrangements undergo alterations spontaneously and inducibly. Nobuhiro Suzuki, Agrivirology Laboratory, Institute of Plant Science The inducible MyRV1 rearrangements are different from any other previous examples of and Bioresources, Okayama reovirus rearrangements in their dependence on an unrelated virus factor, a multifunctional University, Kurashiki, Okayama protein, p29, encoded by a distinct virus Cryphonectria parasitica hypovirus 1 (CHV1). -
Nonstructural Protein Pns4 of Rice Dwarf Virus Is Essential for Viral
Chen et al. Virology Journal (2015) 12:211 DOI 10.1186/s12985-015-0438-6 RESEARCH Open Access Nonstructural protein Pns4 of rice dwarf virus is essential for viral infection in its insect vector Qian Chen, Linghua Zhang, Hongyan Chen, Lianhui Xie* and Taiyun Wei* Abstract Background: Rice dwarf virus (RDV), a plant reovirus, is mainly transmitted by the green rice leafhopper, Nephotettix cincticeps, in a persistent-propagative manner. Plant reoviruses are thought to replicate and assemble within cytoplasmic structures called viroplasms. Nonstructural protein Pns4 of RDV, a phosphoprotein, is localized around the viroplasm matrix and forms minitubules in insect vector cells. However, the functional role of Pns4 minitubules during viral infection in insect vector is still unknown yet. Methods: RNA interference (RNAi) system targeting Pns4 gene of RDV was conducted. Double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) specific for Pns4 gene was synthesized in vitro, and introduced into cultured leafhopper cells by transfection or into insect body by microinjection. The effects of the knockdown of Pns4 expression due to RNAi induced by synthesized dsRNA from Pns4 gene on viral replication and spread in cultured cells and insect vector were analyzed using immunofluorescence, western blotting or RT-PCR assays. Results: In cultured leafhopper cells, the knockdown of Pns4 expression due to RNAi induced by synthesized dsRNA from Pns4 gene strongly inhibited the formation of minitubules, preventing the accumulation of viroplasms and efficient viral infection in insect vector cells. RNAi induced by microinjection of dsRNA from Pns4 gene significantly reduced the viruliferous rate of N. cincticeps. Furthermore, it also strongly inhibited the formation of minitubules and viroplasms, preventing efficient viral spread from the initially infected site in the filter chamber of intact insect vector. -
Impact of Raspberry Bushy Dwarf Virus, Raspberry Leaf Mottle Virus, and Raspberry Latent Virus on Plant Growth and Fruit Crumbliness in Red Raspberry (Rubus Idaeus L.)'Meeker'
AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Diego F. Quito-Avila for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Botany and Plant Pathology presented on November 21, 2011 Title: Impact of Raspberry bushy dwarf virus, Raspberry leaf mottle virus, and Raspberry latent virus on Plant Growth and Fruit Crumbliness in Red Raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) ‘Meeker’ Abstract approved: _____________________________________________________________________ Robert R. Martin The United States is the third-largest producer of raspberries in the world. Washington State leads the nation in red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) production. ‘Meeker’, the most grown red raspberry cultivar in the Pacific Northwest (Washington, Oregon and British Columbia, Canada) is highly susceptible to Raspberry crumbly fruit, a virus- induced disease that produces drupelet abortion and reduces fruit quality and yield. The disease has long been attributed to Raspberry bushy dwarf virus (RBDV), a pollen-and-seed transmitted virus found in most commercial raspberry fields around the world. In recent years, an increased severity of crumbly fruit was observed in areas where two additional viruses were common. One of these viruses, Raspberry leaf mottle virus (RLMV), was characterized recently and shown to be a novel closterovirus transmitted by the large raspberry aphid Amphorophora agathonica Hottes. The second virus, Raspberry latent virus (RpLV) was a tentative member of the family Reoviridae whose characterization remained to be completed. To investigate the role of these two new viruses in the crumbly fruit disorder, ‘Meeker’ raspberry infected with single or mixtures of the three viruses, in all possible combinations, were generated by graft inoculation. Eight treatments, including a virus- free control, were planted in the field at the Northwestern Research and Extension Center in Mt. -
Complete Sequence and Genetic Characterization of Raspberry Latent Virus, a Novel Member of the Family Reoviridaeଝ,ଝଝ
Virus Research 155 (2011) 397–405 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Virus Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/virusres Complete sequence and genetic characterization of Raspberry latent virus, a novel member of the family Reoviridaeଝ,ଝଝ Diego F. Quito-Avila a,∗, Wilhelm Jelkmann b, Ioannis E. Tzanetakis c, Karen Keller d, Robert R. Martin a,d a Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA b Julius Kuhn-Institut, Institute for Plant Protection in Fruit Crops and Viticulture, Dossenheim 69221, Germany c Department of Plant Pathology, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA d Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA article info abstract Article history: A new virus isolated from red raspberry plants and detected in the main production areas in northern Received 7 September 2010 Washington State, USA and British Columbia, Canada was fully sequenced and found to be a novel member Received in revised form of the family Reoviridae. The virus was designated as Raspberry latent virus (RpLV) based on the fact that 12 November 2010 it is symptomless when present in single infections in several Rubus virus indicators and commercial Accepted 19 November 2010 raspberry cultivars. RpLV genome is 26,128 nucleotides (nt) divided into 10 dsRNA segments. The length Available online 7 December 2010 of the genomic segments (S) was similar to those of other reoviruses ranging from 3948 nt (S1) to 1141 nt (S10). All of the segments, except S8, have the conserved terminal sequences 5-AGUU—-GAAUAC-3.A Keywords: Reoviridae point mutation at each terminus of S8 resulted in the sequences 5 -AGUA—-GAUUAC-3 .