DOCSLIB.ORG

Pagina 1 Di 2 01/08/2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pagina 1 Di 2 01/08/2014 Pagina 1 di 2 Print African swine fever, Russia Close Information received on 02/07/2014 from Dr Evgeny Nepoklonov, Deputy Head, Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance, Ministry of Agriculture, Moscow, Russia Summary Report type Follow-up report No. 16 Date of start of the event 14/01/2014 Date of pre-confirmation of the 22/01/2014 event Report date 02/07/2014 Date submitted to OIE 02/07/2014 Reason for notification First occurrence of a listed disease Manifestation of disease Clinical disease Causal agent African swine fever virus Nature of diagnosis Clinical, Laboratory (basic), Laboratory (advanced) This event pertains to a defined zone within the country Immediate notification (24/01/2014) Follow-up report No. 1 (27/01/2014) Follow-up report No. 2 (03/02/2014) Follow-up report No. 3 (05/02/2014) Follow-up report No. 4 (11/02/2014) Follow-up report No. 5 (14/02/2014) Follow-up report No. 6 (18/02/2014) Follow-up report No. 7 (25/02/2014) Follow-up report No. 8 (11/03/2014) Follow-up report No. 9 (24/03/2014) Follow-up report No. 10 (11/04/2014) Related reports Follow-up report No. 11 (20/05/2014) Follow-up report No. 12 (26/05/2014) Follow-up report No. 13 (20/06/2014) Follow-up report No. 14 (23/06/2014) Follow-up report No. 15 (26/06/2014) Follow-up report No. 16 (02/07/2014) Follow-up report No. 17 (03/07/2014) Follow-up report No. 18 (08/07/2014) Follow-up report No. 19 (14/07/2014) Follow-up report No. 20 (16/07/2014) Follow-up report No. 21 (23/07/2014) Follow-up report No. 22 (24/07/2014) New outbreaks (3) Outbreak 1 Uvarovo, Elninsky, SMOLENSKAYA OBLAST Date of start of the outbreak 25/06/2014 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Village Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Swine 9 1 0 1 0 Affected population Backyard pigs Outbreak 2 Bolshaya Budnica, Nevelsky, PSKOVSKAYA OBLAST Date of start of the outbreak 29/06/2014 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Swine 40230 76 76 14 0 Outbreak 3 Lobock, Nevelsky, PSKOVSKAYA OBLAST Date of start of the outbreak 29/06/2014 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Village Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Swine 36 2 2 0 0 http://www.oie.int/wahis_2/public/wahid.php/Reviewreport/Review?page_refer=Map... 01/08/2014 Pagina 2 di 2 Summary of Total outbreaks: 3 outbreaks Total animals Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered affected Swine 40275 79 78 15 0 Apparent morbidity Apparent mortality Apparent case fatality Proportion susceptible animals Species Outbreak statistics rate rate rate lost* Swine 0.20% 0.19% 98.73% 0.23% *Removed from the susceptible population through death, destruction and/or slaughter Epidemiology Source of the outbreak(s) or origin of infection Unknown or inconclusive Control measures Control of wildlife reservoirs Quarantine Movement control inside the country Measures applied Screening Disinfection of infected premises/establishment(s) No vaccination No treatment of affected animals Measures to be applied Stamping out Diagnostic test results Laboratory name and type Species Test Test date Result Government Budget Institution, Pskov oblast Veterinary Laboratory (Local Swine direct immunofluorescence 29/06/2014 Positive laboratory) (DIF) test Government Budget Institution, Pskov oblast Veterinary Laboratory (Local Swine direct immunofluorescence 30/06/2014 Positive laboratory) (DIF) test Government Budget Institution, Pskov oblast Veterinary Laboratory (Local Swine polymerase chain reaction 29/06/2014 Positive laboratory) (PCR) Government Budget Institution, Pskov oblast Veterinary Laboratory (Local Swine polymerase chain reaction 30/06/2014 Positive laboratory) (PCR) Government Budget Institution, Smolensk oblast Veterinary Laboratory (Local Swine polymerase chain reaction 30/06/2014 Positive laboratory) (PCR) State Science Institution National Research Institute of Veterinary Virology and Swine polymerase chain reaction 01/07/2014 Positive Microbiology of Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences (National laboratory) (PCR) Future Reporting The event is continuing. Weekly follow-up reports will be submitted. Map of outbreak locations http://www.oie.int/wahis_2/public/wahid.php/Reviewreport/Review?page_refer=Map... 01/08/2014.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Longitudinal Data 1994-2019 Individuals Codebooks RLMS – HSE Имя Метка Переменной Значение Метка Значения Переменной Переменной
    Longitudinal Data 1994-2019 Individuals Codebooks RLMS – HSE Имя Метка переменной Значение Метка значения переменной переменной ID_W WAVE OF SURVEY=YEAR 5 1994 6 1995 7 1996 8 1998 9 2000 10 2001 11 2002 12 2003 13 2004 14 2005 15 2006 16 2007 17 2008 18 2009 19 2010 20 2011 21 2012 22 2013 23 2014 24 2015 25 2016 26 2017 27 2018 28 2019 IDIND UNIQUE LONGITUDINAL PERSON ID YEAR YEAR REDID_I RESPONDENT`S ID: ORDINAL NUMBER ID_I PERSON ID NUMBER - unique for the given round ID_H HOUSEHOLD ID NUMBER - unique for the given round ORIGSM REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE 0 No, it is not belong to the representative sample: the family moved had been surveyed at it is new adress 1 Yes, it is an adress from the representative sample INWGT SAMPLE WEIGHT OF INDIVIDUAL REGION REGION--COVER.1 1 Leningrad Oblast: Volosovkij Rajon 9 Krasnodar CR 10 Udmurt ASSR: Glasov CR 12 Perm Oblast: Solikamsk City & Rajon Longitudinal Data 1994-2019 Individuals Codebooks RLMS – HSE Имя Метка переменной Значение Метка значения переменной переменной 14 Kaluzhskaya Oblast: Kuibyshev Rajon 33 Tambov Oblast: Uvarovo CR 39 Volgograd Oblast: Rudnjanskij Rajon 45 Tatarskaja ASSR: Kazan 46 Kurgan 47 Orenburg Oblast: Orsk 48 Chuvashskaya ASSR: Shumerlja CR 52 Stavropolskij Kraj: Georgievskij CR 58 Altaiskij Kraj: Kur`inskij Rajon 66 Krasnojarskij Kraij: Krasnojarsk 67 Kalinin Oblast: Rzhev CR 70 Saratov CR 71 Tomsk 72 Lipetskaya Oblast: Lipetsk CR 73 Krasnojarskij Kraij: Nazarovo CR 77 Kabardino-Balkarija, Zol `skij Rajon 84 Altaiskij Kraj: Biisk CR 86 Tumenskaya Oblast, Surgutskij Rajon: Khanty-Mansi Aut Okrug (1994-2002) 89 Komi-ASSR: Usinsk CR 92 Vladivostok 93 Amurskaja Oblast: Tambovskii Rajon 100 Saratov Oblast: Volskij Gorosovet & Rajon 105 Komi-ASSR: Syktyvkar 106 Cheliabinsk 107 Cheliabinsk Oblast: Krasnoarmeiskij Rajon 116 Gorkovskaja Oblast: Nizhnij Novgorod 117 Penzenskaya Oblast: Zemetchinskij Rajon 129 Krasnodarskij Kraj: Kushchevskij Rajon 135 Smolensk CR 136 Tulskaja Oblast: Tula 137 Rostov Oblast: Batajsk 138 Moscow City 139 Moscow City 140 New Moscow City 141 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Demographic, Economic, Geospatial Data for Municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (Excluding the City of Moscow and the Moscow Oblast) in 2010-2016
    Population and Economics 3(4): 121–134 DOI 10.3897/popecon.3.e39152 DATA PAPER Demographic, economic, geospatial data for municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010-2016 Irina E. Kalabikhina1, Denis N. Mokrensky2, Aleksandr N. Panin3 1 Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia 2 Independent researcher 3 Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia Received 10 December 2019 ♦ Accepted 28 December 2019 ♦ Published 30 December 2019 Citation: Kalabikhina IE, Mokrensky DN, Panin AN (2019) Demographic, economic, geospatial data for munic- ipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010- 2016. Population and Economics 3(4): 121–134. https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.3.e39152 Keywords Data base, demographic, economic, geospatial data JEL Codes: J1, J3, R23, Y10, Y91 I. Brief description The database contains demographic, economic, geospatial data for 452 municipalities of the 16 administrative units of the Central Federal District (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) for 2010–2016 (Appendix, Table 1; Fig. 1). The sources of data are the municipal-level statistics of Rosstat, Google Maps data and calculated indicators. II. Data resources Data package title: Demographic, economic, geospatial data for municipalities of the Cen- tral Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010–2016. Copyright I.E. Kalabikhina, D.N.Mokrensky, A.N.Panin The article is publicly available and in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC-BY 4.0) can be used without limits, distributed and reproduced on any medium, pro- vided that the authors and the source are indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Charitable Activity of the Elena and Gennady Timchenko Foundation Timchenko Elena & Gennady Timchenko Foundation Foundation Contents
    2015 REPORT ON THE CHARITABLE ACTIVITY OF THE ELENA AND GENNADY TIMCHENKO FOUNDATION TIMCHENKO ELENA & GENNADY TIMCHENKO FOUNDATION FOUNDATION CONTENTS Message from Elena and Gennady Timchenko .....................4 Working with the Foundation.............................................109 Message from Xenia Frank .....................................................6 Selecting grant recipients .............................................. 110 Message from Maria Morozova .............................................8 Open grant competitions ............................................... 110 The Foundation’s mission statement and values ................10 Non-competitive support ................................................111 Work programme ..................................................................11 Duration of project support ............................................111 5 years of work – facts and results ...................................... 12 Programme evaluation system ...........................................111 Key results in 2015 .............................................................. 16 Risk management ...............................................................112 Interaction with stakeholders .............................................112 Working with enquiries from the public .........................112 THE OLDER GENERATION PROGRAMME .......................18 Working with regional agents .........................................113 Society for all Ages Focus Area ............................................24
    [Show full text]
  • Child Benefits and Child Poverty*
    Child Bene…ts and Child Poverty¤ Irina Denisova, Stanislav Kolenikov and Ksenia Yudaeva October 2000 Abstract The purpose of the paper is to analyze the e¤ects of changes in policy of child bene…t provision on child poverty. In particular, we examine whether the introduction of means-testing schemes in the regions has improved targeting of child bene…ts. We test whether the probability of being paid depends negatively or positively on income, and whether this probability increased between 1996 and 1998 for the poor part of the population. In addition to probability analysis, we use direct poverty analysis, i.e., we decompose the change in poverty into changes in child bene…ts, and other factors. We carry out a comparative analysis among three groups of regions which di¤er with respect to the approach chosen to identify the needy families with children. We pay special attention to the relative e¢ciency of a variety of means-testing schemes. ¤We thank Anthony Shorrocks and Elena Kupriyanova for useful comments and suggestions. In the 1990s, Russia has experienced a severe poverty increase: according to o¢cial statistics the poverty rate has changed from 14.3% in 1991 to 34.1% in 1999, and there are some non-o¢cial estimates according to which the increase was even larger. The poverty upsurge was accompanied by changes in the composition of the pool of the poor. As was shown by Mroz and Popkin (1997, 1999), Braithwaite (1997), and Rimashevskaya (1997) among others, a substantial part of the poverty rise can be attributed to the appearance of the so called ”new poor”, i.e., able to work individuals without dependents.
    [Show full text]
  • Territorial Aspects of Restructuring – the Problems of Single Industry Towns and Areas
    The third UNECE Enterprise Development Week Round Table on “Industrial Restructuring in European Economies in Transition: Experience to Date and Prospects” 13 January 2002, Geneva (Switzerland). Lapteva Olga Russian Federation. Territorial aspects of restructuring – the problems of single industry towns and areas. According to the law of the Russian Federation the approximate criteria of the single industry town and area complexes are defined as follows: - The single industry town and area complex should compile not less than 50% of the total amount of the general of all the economic subjects (excepting housing and communal sphere), located on the territory of the given municipal formation. - Its make quantity (goods, services) in respect of the cost compiles more than 50% of the total make quantity (goods, services) of all the economic subjects, located on the territory of the given municipal formation. - The structure of the single town and area complex may contain: the scientific organizations, higher educational establishments and training schools; the objects of the innovation infrastructure. The objects of the social infrastructure and the structures providing the activity of the municipal formation may not be comprised in the system of the single town and area. There are 200 monoprofile towns in the Russian Federation. The law project devoted to the single town and area complexes, discussed by the State Duma on the 17th of October, 1998, was, however, rejected. What is applied by now is the Federal law “On scientific (academic) towns”. The necessity of judicial arrangement of the certain problems connected to the type of towns in question became extremely vital during the privatization company held in the Russian Federation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Regional Income Inequality in Russia and Its Possible Health Consequences Per Carlson
    389 J Epidemiol Community Health: first published as 10.1136/jech.2003.017301 on 14 April 2005. Downloaded from RESEARCH REPORT Relatively poor, absolutely ill? A study of regional income inequality in Russia and its possible health consequences Per Carlson ............................................................................................................................... J Epidemiol Community Health 2005;59:389–394. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.017301 Study objective: To investigate whether the income distribution in a Russian region has a ‘‘contextual’’ effect on individuals’ self rated health, and whether the regional income distributions are related to regional health differences. Methods: The Russia longitudinal monitoring survey (RLMS) is a survey (n = 7696) that is representative of the Russian population. With multilevel regressions both individual as well as contextual effects on self rated health were estimated. ....................... Main results: The effect of income inequality is not negative on men’s self rated health as long as the level Correspondence to: of inequality is not very great. When inequality levels are high, however, there is a tendency for men’s Dr P Carlson, Stockholm health to be negatively affected. Regional health differences among men are in part explained by regional Centre on Health of income differences. On the other hand, women do not seem to be affected in the same way, and individual Societies in Transition, characteristics like age and educational level seem to be more important. University College of South Stockholm, S-14189 Conclusions: It seems that a rise in income inequality has no negative effect on men’s self rated health as Huddinge, Sweden; long as the level of inequality is not very great.
    [Show full text]
  • EVALUATION Final Performance Evaluation USAID Maternal and Child Health Project Evaluation Report
    USAID Pakistan EVALUATION Final Performance Evaluation USAID Maternal And Child Health Project Evaluation Report June 13, 2012 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). It was prepared under the Russia Monitoring & Evaluation Project (RMEP) by International Business &Technical Consultants, Inc. (IBTCI) |RUSSIA FINAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION USAID MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH PROJECT EVALUATION REPORT June 13, 2012 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). It was prepared under the Russia Monitoring & Evaluation Project (RMEP) by International Business &Technical Consultants, Inc. (IBTCI) MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH INITIATIVE FINAL EVALUATION REPORT JUNE 13, 2012 International Business & Technical Consultants, Inc. 8618 Westwood Center Drive Suite 220 Vienna, VA 22182 USA Contracted under RAN-I-00-09-00016-00, Order No. AID-118-TO-11-00004 Russia Monitoring and Evaluation Project Evaluation Team: Alexey Kuzmin (team leader) Annette Bongiovanni Natalia Kosheleva DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Russia Monitoring and Evaluation Project – MCH Evaluation Draft Report Table of Contents Boxes, Figures and Tables ....................................................................................................................... a Acronyms and Abbreviations..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTURE CITY CITY DELIVERY Region Terms of Delivery (Working
    Terms of DEPARTURE CITY CITY DELIVERY Region delivery COST OF DELIVERY (working days) Moscow VIP - in Yekaterinburg Sverdlovsk 1 775 Moscow VIP - by Kazan Rep. Tatarstan 1 775 Moscow VIP - on Kaliningrad Kaliningrad 1-2 775 Moscow VIP - in Krasnodar Krasnodar region 1 775 Moscow VIP - around Krasnoyarsk (unless in Krasnoyarsk) Krasnoyarsk region 1 1285 Moscow VIP - Moscow Moscow 1 1285 Moscow VIP - in Nizhny Novgorod Nizhny Novgorod 1 775 Moscow VIP - in Novosibirsk Novosibirsk 1 1285 Moscow VIP - for Perm Perm 1 775 Moscow VIP - to Rostov-on-Don Rostov 1 775 Moscow VIP - by Samara Samara 1 775 Moscow VIP - in St. Petersburg Leningrad 1 1285 Moscow VIP - of Ufa Rep. Bashkiria 1 775 Moscow A.Kosmodemyanskogo village (Kaliningrad) Kaliningrad 2-3 515 Moscow Ababurovo (Leninsky district, Moscow region). Moscow 2-3 850 Moscow Abaza (Resp. Khakassia) Khakassia 6-7 1865 Moscow Abakan (rep. Khakassia) Khakassia 3-4 1070 Moscow Abbakumova (Moscow region). Moscow 2-3 850 Moscow Abdulino (Orenburg region). Orenburg 4-5 965 Moscow Abinsk (Krasnodar) Krasnodar region 3-6 1175 Moscow Abramtsevo (Balashikha district, Moscow region). Moscow 2-3 850 Moscow Abrau Djurso (Krasnodar) Krasnodar region 3-5 965 Moscow Avdon (rep. Bashkortostan) Bashkortostan 4 585 Moscow Aviators (Balashikha district, Moscow region). Moscow 2-3 850 Moscow Autorange (Moscow region). Moscow 2-3 850 Moscow Agalatovo (Len.oblasti) Leningrad 4 965 Moscow Ageevka (Orel). Oryol 2-3 850 Moscow Aghidel (rep. Bashkiriya) Rep. Bashkiria 3-4 850 Moscow Aga (Krasnodar, Tuapsinsky area) Krasnodar region 3-4 965 Moscow Agro (Balashikha district, Moscow region). Moscow 2-3 850 Moscow Agryz (rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Poverty and Income Inequality in the Eastern Europe
    Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series Working Paper No. 324 Regional Poverty and Income Inequality in Central and Eastern Europe: Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study Michael Förster, David Jesuit and Timothy Smeeding July 2002 Luxembourg Income Study (LIS), asbl DRAFT July 1, 2002 Regional Poverty and Income Inequality in Central and Eastern Europe: Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study* by: Michael Förster, David Jesuit and Timothy Smeeding ABSTRACT This paper reports levels of income inequality and poverty in four Central and Eastern European countries: the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Russia. Unlike previous research on transition economies, we aggregate the detailed individual-level income surveys made available through the efforts of the Luxembourg Income Study at the regional level of analysis. Although national-level investigations have contributed much to our understanding of the income distribution dynamics, these studies mask intra-country variance in levels of income inequality and thus may not capture the true distribution of household income and accurately reflect individual well-being. Accordingly, we compute summary measures of inequality and relative poverty rates, using both local and national relative poverty lines, for the most recent waves of data available. We offer comparisons between regional and national median incomes and assess levels of inter- and intra-regional income inequality. CONTENTS Introduction......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ruth Heuertz Remmers
    PERCEPTIONS OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND OF TOURISM IN THE ALTAI REPUBLIC, THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION By Copyright 2017 Ruth Heuertz Remmers Submitted to the graduate degree program in Geography and Atmospheric Science and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. ________________________________ Alexander C. Diener, Ph. D., Chair ________________________________ Stephen Egbert, Ph. D. ________________________________ Gerald E. Mikkelson, Ph. D. Date Defended: February 14, 2017 ii The Thesis Committee for Ruth Heuertz Remmers certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: PERCEPTIONS OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND OF TOURISM IN THE ALTAI REPUBLIC, THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ________________________________ Alexander C. Diener, Ph. D., Chair Date approved: February 14, 2017 iii Abstract Although only 210,000 people reside in the Altai Republic of Western Siberia, the area received 1.8 million tourists in 2015. The overwhelming majority of visitors arrive from other areas of Russia. While tourists appreciate the landscape of the Altai Mountains and bring increased seasonal economic activity, not all of tourism’s effects benefit the local culture, economy or environment. This paper presents survey data concerning perceptions of residents and visitors about the environment and tourism. During the summer of 2015, a survey was distributed in four locations across the Altai Republic. Resident respondents included Russians, local members of Altaian clans, and Kazakhs, and visitors included Russian citizens from across the Russian Federation. Analyzing the data contributes to understanding the complex interactions between tourists, residents, indigenous peoples, the environment and the cultural landscape. Keywords Altai, Environment, Indigenous, Mountains, Perception, Russia, Siberia, Sustainability, Tourism iv Acknowledgements I wish to thank my advisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]