Take GPU Processing Power Beyond Graphics with GPU Computing on Mali
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
GPU Developments 2018
GPU Developments 2018 2018 GPU Developments 2018 © Copyright Jon Peddie Research 2019. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without written permission from Jon Peddie Research. This report is the property of Jon Peddie Research (JPR) and made available to a restricted number of clients only upon these terms and conditions. Agreement not to copy or disclose. This report and all future reports or other materials provided by JPR pursuant to this subscription (collectively, “Reports”) are protected by: (i) federal copyright, pursuant to the Copyright Act of 1976; and (ii) the nondisclosure provisions set forth immediately following. License, exclusive use, and agreement not to disclose. Reports are the trade secret property exclusively of JPR and are made available to a restricted number of clients, for their exclusive use and only upon the following terms and conditions. JPR grants site-wide license to read and utilize the information in the Reports, exclusively to the initial subscriber to the Reports, its subsidiaries, divisions, and employees (collectively, “Subscriber”). The Reports shall, at all times, be treated by Subscriber as proprietary and confidential documents, for internal use only. Subscriber agrees that it will not reproduce for or share any of the material in the Reports (“Material”) with any entity or individual other than Subscriber (“Shared Third Party”) (collectively, “Share” or “Sharing”), without the advance written permission of JPR. Subscriber shall be liable for any breach of this agreement and shall be subject to cancellation of its subscription to Reports. Without limiting this liability, Subscriber shall be liable for any damages suffered by JPR as a result of any Sharing of any Material, without advance written permission of JPR. -
Mali-400 MP: a Scalable GPU for Mobile Devices
Mali-400 MP: A Scalable GPU for Mobile Devices Tom Olson Director, Graphics Research, ARM Outline . ARM and Mobile Graphics . Design Constraints for Mobile GPUs . Mali Architecture Overview . Multicore Scaling in Mali-400 MP . Results 2 About ARM . World’s leading supplier of semiconductor IP . Processor Architectures and Implementations . Related IP: buses, caches, debug & trace, physical IP . Software tools and infrastructure . Business Model . License fees . Per-chip royalties . Graphics at ARM . Acquired Falanx in 2006 . ARM Mali is now the world’s most widely licensed GPU family 3 Challenges for Mobile GPUs . Size . Power . Memory Bandwidth 4 More Challenges . Graphics is going into “anything that has a screen” . Mobile . Navigation . Set Top Box/DTV . Automotive . Video telephony . Cameras . Printers . Huge range of form factors, screen sizes, power budgets, and performance requirements . In some applications, a huge difference between peak and average performance requirements 5 Solution: Scalability . Address a wide variety of performance points and applications with a single IP and a single software stack. Need static scalability to adapt to different peak requirements in different platforms / markets . Need dynamic scalability to reduce power when peak performance isn’t needed 6 Options for Scalability . Fine-grained: Multiple pipes, wide SIMD, etc . Proven approach, efficient and effective . But, adding pipes / lanes is invasive . Hard for IP licensees to do on their own . And, hard to partition to provide dynamic scalability . Coarse-grained: Multicore . Easy for licensees to select desired performance . Putting cores on separate power islands allows dynamic scaling 7 Mali 400-MP Top Level Architecture Asynch Mali-400 MP Top-Level APB Geometry Pixel Processor Pixel Processor Pixel Processor Pixel Processor Processor #1 #2 #3 #4 CLKs MaliMMUs RESETs IRQs IDLEs MaliL2 AXI . -
On Heterogeneous Compute and Memory Systems
ON HETEROGENEOUS COMPUTE AND MEMORY SYSTEMS by Jason Lowe-Power A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Computer Sciences) at the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN–MADISON 2017 Date of final oral examination: 05/31/2017 The dissertation is approved by the following members of the Final Oral Committee: Mark D. Hill, Professor, Computer Sciences Dan Negrut, Professor, Mechanical Engineering Jignesh M. Patel, Professor, Computer Sciences Karthikeyan Sankaralingam, Associate Professor, Computer Sciences David A. Wood, Professor, Computer Sciences © Copyright by Jason Lowe-Power 2017 All Rights Reserved i Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledge all of the people who helped me along the way to completing this dissertation. First, I would like to thank my advisors, Mark Hill and David Wood. Often, when students have multiple advisors they find there is high “synchronization overhead” between the advisors. However, Mark and David complement each other well. Mark is a high-level thinker, focusing on the structure of the argument and distilling ideas to their essentials; David loves diving into the details of microarchitectural mechanisms. Although ever busy, at least one of Mark or David were available to meet with me, and they always took the time to help when I needed it. Together, Mark and David taught me how to be a researcher, and they have given me a great foundation to build my career. I thank my committee members. Jignesh Patel for his collaborations, and for the fact that each time I walked out of his office after talking to him, I felt a unique excitement about my research. -
Intel Desktop Board DG41MJ Product Guide
Intel® Desktop Board DG41MJ Product Guide Order Number: E59138-001 Revision History Revision Revision History Date -001 First release of the Intel® Desktop Board DG41MJ Product Guide February 2009 If an FCC declaration of conformity marking is present on the board, the following statement applies: FCC Declaration of Conformity This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) this device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. For questions related to the EMC performance of this product, contact: Intel Corporation, 5200 N.E. Elam Young Parkway, Hillsboro, OR 97124 1-800-628-8686 This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class B digital device, pursuant to Part 15 of the FCC Rules. These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful interference in a residential installation. This equipment generates, uses, and can radiate radio frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accordance with the instructions, may cause harmful interference to radio communications. However, there is no guarantee that interference will not occur in a particular installation. If this equipment does cause harmful interference to radio or television reception, which can be determined by turning the equipment off and on, the user is encouraged to try to correct the interference by one or more of the following measures: • Reorient or relocate the receiving antenna. • Increase the separation between the equipment and the receiver. • Connect the equipment to an outlet on a circuit other than the one to which the receiver is connected. -
GMAI: a GPU Memory Allocation Inspection Tool for Understanding and Exploiting the Internals of GPU Resource Allocation in Critical Systems
The final publication is available at ACM via http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1145/3391896 GMAI: A GPU Memory Allocation Inspection Tool for Understanding and Exploiting the Internals of GPU Resource Allocation in Critical Systems ALEJANDRO J. CALDERÓN, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya & Ikerlan Technology Research Centre LEONIDAS KOSMIDIS, Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC) CARLOS F. NICOLÁS, Ikerlan Technology Research Centre FRANCISCO J. CAZORLA, Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC) PEIO ONAINDIA, Ikerlan Technology Research Centre Critical real-time systems require strict resource provisioning in terms of memory and timing. The constant need for higher performance in these systems has led industry to recently include GPUs. However, GPU software ecosystems are by their nature closed source, forcing system engineers to consider them as black boxes, complicating resource provisioning. In this work we reverse engineer the internal operations of the GPU system software to increase the understanding of their observed behaviour and how resources are internally managed. We present our methodology which is incorporated in GMAI (GPU Memory Allocation Inspector), a tool which allows system engineers to accurately determine the exact amount of resources required by their critical systems, avoiding underprovisioning. We first apply our methodology on a wide range of GPU hardware from different vendors showing itsgeneralityin obtaining the properties of the GPU memory allocators. Next, we demonstrate the benefits of such knowledge in resource provisioning of two case studies from the automotive domain, where the actual memory consumption is up to 5.6× more than the memory requested by the application. ACM Reference Format: Alejandro J. Calderón, Leonidas Kosmidis, Carlos F. Nicolás, Francisco J. -
Intel® Desktop Board DG965RY Product Guide
Intel® Desktop Board DG965RY Product Guide Order Number: D46818-003 Revision History Revision Revision History Date -001 First release of the Intel® Desktop Board DG965RY Product Guide June 2006 -002 Second release of the Intel® Desktop Board DG965RY Product Guide September 2006 -003 Added operating system support December 2006 If an FCC declaration of conformity marking is present on the board, the following statement applies: FCC Declaration of Conformity This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) this device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. For questions related to the EMC performance of this product, contact: Intel Corporation, 5200 N.E. Elam Young Parkway, Hillsboro, OR 97124 1-800-628-8686 This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class B digital device, pursuant to Part 15 of the FCC Rules. These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful interference in a residential installation. This equipment generates, uses, and can radiate radio frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accordance with the instructions, may cause harmful interference to radio communications. However, there is no guarantee that interference will not occur in a particular installation. If this equipment does cause harmful interference to radio or television reception, which can be determined by turning the equipment off and on, the user is encouraged to try to correct the interference by one or more of the following measures: • Reorient or relocate the receiving antenna. -
Heterogeneous Cpu+Gpu Computing
HETEROGENEOUS CPU+GPU COMPUTING Ana Lucia Varbanescu – University of Amsterdam [email protected] Significant contributions by: Stijn Heldens (U Twente), Jie Shen (NUDT, China), Heterogeneous platforms • Systems combining main processors and accelerators • e.g., CPU + GPU, CPU + Intel MIC, AMD APU, ARM SoC • Everywhere from supercomputers to mobile devices Heterogeneous platforms • Host-accelerator hardware model Accelerator FPGAs Accelerator PCIe / Shared memory ... Host MICs Accelerator GPUs Accelerator CPUs Our focus today … • A heterogeneous platform = CPU + GPU • Most solutions work for other/multiple accelerators • An application workload = an application + its input dataset • Workload partitioning = workload distribution among the processing units of a heterogeneous system Few cores Thousands of Cores 5 Generic multi-core CPU 6 Programming models • Pthreads + intrinsics • TBB – Thread building blocks • Threading library • OpenCL • To be discussed … • OpenMP • Traditional parallel library • High-level, pragma-based • Cilk • Simple divide-and-conquer model abstractionincreasesLevel of 7 A GPU Architecture Offloading model Kernel Host code 9 Programming models • CUDA • NVIDIA proprietary • OpenCL • Open standard, functionally portable across multi-cores • OpenACC • High-level, pragma-based • Different libraries, programming models, and DSLs for different domains Level of abstractionincreasesLevel of CPU vs. GPU 10 ALU ALU CPU Control Low latency, high Throughput: ~ALU 500 GFLOPsALU flexibility. Bandwidth: ~ 60 GB/s Excellent for -
Intel® Desktop Board DG41TX Product Guide
Intel® Desktop Board DG41TX Product Guide Order Number: E88309-001 Revision History Revision Revision History Date ® -001 First release of the Intel Desktop Board DG41TX Product Guide February 2010 Disclaimer INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH INTEL® PRODUCTS. NO LICENSE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, BY ESTOPPEL OR OTHERWISE, TO ANY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IS GRANTED BY THIS DOCUMENT. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN INTEL’S TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE FOR SUCH PRODUCTS, INTEL ASSUMES NO LIABILITY WHATSOEVER, AND INTEL DISCLAIMS ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY, RELATING TO SALE AND/OR USE OF INTEL PRODUCTS INCLUDING LIABILITY OR WARRANTIES RELATING TO FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, MERCHANTABILITY, OR INFRINGEMENT OF ANY PATENT, COPYRIGHT OR OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT. Intel products are not intended for use in medical, life saving, or life sustaining applications. Intel may make changes to specifications and product descriptions at any time, without notice. Intel Desktop Board DG41TX may contain design defects or errors known as errata which may cause the product to deviate from published specifications. Current characterized errata are available on request. Contact your local Intel sales office or your distributor to obtain the latest specifications and before placing your product order. Copies of documents which have an ordering number and are referenced in this document, or other Intel literature, may be obtained from Intel Corporation by going to the World Wide Web site at: http://intel.com/ or by calling 1-800-548-4725. Intel and the Intel logo are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and other countries. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. -
The Bifrost GPU Architecture and the ARM Mali-G71 GPU
The Bifrost GPU architecture and the ARM Mali-G71 GPU Jem Davies ARM Fellow and VP of Technology Hot Chips 28 Aug 2016 Introduction to ARM Soft IP . ARM licenses Soft IP cores (amongst other things) to our Silicon Partners . They then make chips and sell to OEMs, who sell consumer devices . “ARM doesn’t make chips”… . We provide all the RTL, integration testbenches, memories lists, reference floorplans, example synthesis scripts, sometimes models, sometimes FPGA images, sometimes with implementation advice, always with memory system requirements/recommendations . Consequently silicon area, power, frequencies, performance, benchmark scores can therefore vary quite a bit in real silicon… 2 © ARM2016 ARM Mali: The world’s #1 shipping GPU 750M 65 27 Mali-based new Mali GPUs shipped 140 Total licenses in in 2015 Total licenses licensees FY15 Mali is in: Mali graphics based IC shipments (units) 750m ~75% ~50% ~40% 550m of of of 400m DTVs… tablets… smartphones 150m <50m 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 3 © ARM2016 ARM Mali graphics processor generations Mali-G71 BIFROST … GPU Unified shader cores, scalar ISA, clause execution, full coherency, Vulkan, OpenCL MIDGARD Mali-T600 GPU series Mali-T700 GPU series Mali-T800 GPU series Unified shader cores, SIMD ISA, OpenGL ES 3.x, OpenCL, Vulkan Presented at HotChips 2015 Mali-200 Mali-300 Mali-400 Mali-450 Mali-470 UTGARD GPU GPU GPU GPU GPU Separate shader cores, SIMD ISA, OpenGL ES 2.x 4 © ARM2016 Bifrost features . Leverages Mali’s scalable architecture . Scalable to 32 shader cores 20% Scalable to 32 Higher energy Shader cores . Major shader core redesign efficiency* . -
State-Of-The-Art in Heterogeneous Computing
Scientific Programming 18 (2010) 1–33 1 DOI 10.3233/SPR-2009-0296 IOS Press State-of-the-art in heterogeneous computing Andre R. Brodtkorb a,∗, Christopher Dyken a, Trond R. Hagen a, Jon M. Hjelmervik a and Olaf O. Storaasli b a SINTEF ICT, Department of Applied Mathematics, Blindern, Oslo, Norway E-mails: {Andre.Brodtkorb, Christopher.Dyken, Trond.R.Hagen, Jon.M.Hjelmervik}@sintef.no b Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Future Technologies Group, Oak Ridge, TN, USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Node level heterogeneous architectures have become attractive during the last decade for several reasons: compared to traditional symmetric CPUs, they offer high peak performance and are energy and/or cost efficient. With the increase of fine-grained parallelism in high-performance computing, as well as the introduction of parallelism in workstations, there is an acute need for a good overview and understanding of these architectures. We give an overview of the state-of-the-art in heterogeneous computing, focusing on three commonly found architectures: the Cell Broadband Engine Architecture, graphics processing units (GPUs), and field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). We present a review of hardware, available software tools, and an overview of state-of-the-art techniques and algorithms. Furthermore, we present a qualitative and quantitative comparison of the architectures, and give our view on the future of heterogeneous computing. Keywords: Power-efficient architectures, parallel computer architecture, stream or vector architectures, energy and power consumption, microprocessor performance 1. Introduction the speed of logic gates, making computers smaller and more power efficient. Noyce and Kilby indepen- The goal of this article is to provide an overview of dently invented the integrated circuit in 1958, leading node-level heterogeneous computing, including hard- to further reductions in power and space required for ware, software tools and state-of-the-art algorithms. -
AI Acceleration – Image Processing As a Use Case
AI acceleration – image processing as a use case Masoud Daneshtalab Associate Professor at MDH www.idt.mdh.se/~md/ Outline • Dark Silicon • Heterogeneouse Computing • Approximation – Deep Neural Networks 2 The glory of Moore’s law Intel 4004 Intel Core i7 980X 2300 transistors 1.17B transistors 740 kHz clock 3.33 GHz clock 10um process 32nm process 10.8 usec/inst 73.4 psec/inst Every 2 Years • Double the number of transistors • Build higher performance general-purpose processors ⁻ Make the transistors available to masses ⁻ Increase performance (1.8×↑) ⁻ Lower the cost of computing (1.8×↓) Semiconductor trends ITRS roadmap for SoC Design Complexity Trens ITRS: International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors Expected number of processing elements into a System-on-Chip (SoC). 4 Semiconductor trends ITRS roadmap for SoC Design Complexity Trens 5 Semiconductor trends Network-on-Chip (NoC) –based Multi/Many-core Systems Founder: Andreas Olofsson Sponsored by Ericsson AB 6 Dark Silicon Era The catch is powering exponentially increasing number of transistors without melting the chip down. 10 10 Chip Transistor Count 2,200,000,000 109 Chip Power 108 107 106 105 2300 104 103 130 W 102 101 0.5 W 100 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 If you cannot power them, why bother making them? 7 Dark Silicon Era The catch is powering exponentially increasing number of transistors without melting the chip down. 10 10 Chip Transistor Count 2,200,000,000 109 Chip Power 108 107 Dark Silicon 106 105 (Utilization Wall) 2300 104 Fraction of transistors that need to be 103 powered off at all times due to power 130 W 2 constraints. -
Summarizing CPU and GPU Design Trends with Product Data
Summarizing CPU and GPU Design Trends with Product Data Yifan Sun, Nicolas Bohm Agostini, Shi Dong, and David Kaeli Northeastern University Email: fyifansun, agostini, shidong, [email protected] Abstract—Moore’s Law and Dennard Scaling have guided the products. Equipped with this data, we answer the following semiconductor industry for the past few decades. Recently, both questions: laws have faced validity challenges as transistor sizes approach • Are Moore’s Law and Dennard Scaling still valid? If so, the practical limits of physics. We are interested in testing the validity of these laws and reflect on the reasons responsible. In what are the factors that keep the laws valid? this work, we collect data of more than 4000 publicly-available • Do GPUs still have computing power advantages over CPU and GPU products. We find that transistor scaling remains CPUs? Is the computing capability gap between CPUs critical in keeping the laws valid. However, architectural solutions and GPUs getting larger? have become increasingly important and will play a larger role • What factors drive performance improvements in GPUs? in the future. We observe that GPUs consistently deliver higher performance than CPUs. GPU performance continues to rise II. METHODOLOGY because of increases in GPU frequency, improvements in the thermal design power (TDP), and growth in die size. But we We have collected data for all CPU and GPU products (to also see the ratio of GPU to CPU performance moving closer to our best knowledge) that have been released by Intel, AMD parity, thanks to new SIMD extensions on CPUs and increased (including the former ATI GPUs)1, and NVIDIA since January CPU core counts.